No wonder math was made by a bunch of white men, they couldn’t admit they were wrong so they went to ruin everyone else’s lives
0 notes
I’ve finally seen THE CLIP and I’m not well
This and the “come with me” had me swooning but I was holding it together
But THIS?
With ZERO warning??? Like I’M SORRY? This has me dead in my grave
318 notes
·
View notes
GPTim having both visual and hearing disabilities is so important to me. That man’s eyes were *burned out* when he *exploded the moon* his hearing is gonna be affected also; and having functional accessibility aids (his mechanical eyes, here) does not equal not disabled, it just means that the disability manifests differently.
117 notes
·
View notes
Gabriel and V1 are the same. They are things that inflict violence. Things that kill, that destroy. They were created like that.
Even in his rebellion against the Council, Gabriel remains what they made him: still an executioner, he can only ever slay sinners, carve up their bodies and parade the disembodied carcasses in front of masses.
The greatest soldier of Haven, and the peak oh Humanity's military technology. An angel that ends rebellions, a machine that ends wars.
At the end of the world, with their masters dead and gone, still they can only kill. Even when there's nothing left, it'll be each other. Without reason.
It's what they are.
37 notes
·
View notes
Oops I’m copying @rebouks because I’m also nosy and maybe a lil bit of a self-absorbed broad, so tell me, Darlings…
29 notes
·
View notes
Horse(?) girls for day 2 of OC Kiss Week!
Once I was doing one animal companion, I couldn't not do the other. I learned to draw animals for this. Finally, an image of the oft alluded to June... So we have Carmen and her dear mount June, and halfling baroness Teliah and the elk. No, the elk does not have a name. Well, it does have a name, but it's in elk, and Teliah just doesn't believe in Common translations. Please learn at least basic elk pronunciations. It's polite.
Some process pics under the cut
23 notes
·
View notes
woke up from my “nap” (read: my sleep schedule is fucked so i slept from like 10am to 6pm 😬) and spent like an hour very seriously hypothesizing about the logistics and lore of hyrule kingdom in botw/totk before eventually realizing it is at best a weird mess of retcons and “oh but actually”s at best and lowkey weirdly pro-imperialism at worst and just going back to sleep
69 notes
·
View notes
as so many websites (including academic libraries!!!) continue to degrade their search functions so the user has little to no control over the results I love whenever I learn about the weird hyperspecific commands you can give to AO3. this is what advanced searches should be like.
68 notes
·
View notes
Sorry for being annoying over Anne x Jane but if you ever would have the chance to adapt this ship how would you do it?
by ‘adapt’, do you mean for a dramatisation? because i strictly believe that we need to put a moratorium on tudor related media (excluding henry vii and maaaaybe mary i since they’re underrepresented as is, and it would annoy the right people). so i don’t want an adaptation, frankly.
as for an ideal adaptation… well, i liked the idea of anne and jane’s dynamic in wolf hall — but not anne’s characterisation. it was so belligerent in stripping her of warmth and humanity, and this collective amnesia about criticisms of mantel’s handling of women (and gender) now that she’s dead is really something. personally, i’m fine with violently and bodily shoving her from her pedestal. on a similar strain, channel 5’s anne boleyn tried to give us a similar dynamic — of anne being unsettled by jane, whilst simultaneously looking down at her, and (again) i like the idea of anne being curious about jane, and the dynamic of gender/femininity being played with, with the two being seemingly polar opposites in ideological opposition, but nothing was delivered on that front. for as much as lola talked about jane being ‘machiavellian’... literally nothing was shown really exploring that. the kiss felt like everything else in that show: hollow, trying to be reactionary. you can’t try to explore that dynamic and simultaneously refuse jane any characterisation beyond the periphery of anne’s perspective; it’s imbalanced. also, i don’t like how these adaptations take every opportunity to make anne abusive to others — she is always depicted as putting her hands on jane (as well as striking others) and anne boleyn (channel 5) has her sexually harassing jane. i am not opposed to depicting anne as violent or abusive (there’s arguably evidence for it) but it seems notably one-sided: jane dormer’s account implies jane gave as good as she got (“scratching and bye blows between the queen and her maid”), and jane was clearly willing to undermine and displace her mistress which contradicts the idea of jane as passive/complacently honourable.
arguably the tudors s2 threads the needle the best? anne is irascible and clearly agitated and unsettled by jane, who is shown to be actively involved in her faction, and evidently lacks respect for anne. it just doesn’t take it far enough on characterising jane/giving her a clear motivation, and walks all of it back by s3, anyway.
8 notes
·
View notes