You know what's gonna kill me when we get the inevitable Lu Guang flashbacks?
The fact he's always described as "mature" as his post-dive self implies he must be different now than before. It's hard to imagine exactly what his personality was like before, and if it's written well, he shouldn't be completely unrecognisable. But we know he's been changed.
Imagine a first timeline where Lu Guang just follows along with Cheng Xiaoshi, no attempts to reign him in whatsover. Cheng Xiaoshi having the opportunity to come up with more of his complicated tricks but channelling it into lower stakes stuff like pranks and Lu Guang actually enabling him in that and having fun with it. Imagine tragedy striking when Lu Guang and Cheng Xiaoshi are both allowing themselves to be genuinely happy, no facades.
We know that Cheng Xiaoshi used to put on a brave face in light of his parents' disappearances and what that meant for how he was treated and what he was missing out on. But we also know that Qiao Ling and Lu Guang together have been able to lift that into something more genuine. Imagine a world where Cheng Xiaoshi was able to do the same for Lu Guang. Where they both mutually brought that light into the other's life.
It's still true to some extent in the current worldline, but it's complicated by Lu Guang's own actions. Lu Guang can never be fully honest with Cheng Xiaoshi without (in his mind) losing him forever. But he has to stick by his side in order to have any chance in his hopeless quest. And so, he must distance himself in other ways, protect Cheng Xiaoshi, enforce the rules. Swallow the guilt. It leads to a more lopsided relationship, one where one side is always hiding something from the other and refuses to open up themselves. A relationship that in the original timeline must have been more equal, as partners.
There's something that's been lost here, and it's not just the original Cheng Xiaoshi.
220 notes
·
View notes
Five Pebbles turns up the graphics settings
BSM: Hey, local group, I know you are wondering what is going on. Uh... me too!~
BSM: I was not told about a-
BSM: What are- I'm dehydrated. I'm dehydrated? I don't think, uh...
BSM: Hold on, let me check- uh... it does not say-
FP: I'm turning up the graphics settings, once and for all.
BSM: It does not say any- OH I CAN SEE THE GLINT ON MY HANDS!
BSM: I CAN SEE MY AGE. WHAT THE FUCK?!
BSM: ALSO THERE'S NO WATER.
BSM: Alright so this group senior doesn't know-
NSH: What is hap- what is going on?!
68 notes
·
View notes
learning to enjoy exercise hehe ive been trying to find what feels good nd what feels achievable and i think im starting to get it :) this time ive been so focused on reframing exercise to be positive and more about health rather than weight and its such very intentional shift to make and its easy to fall back from it but i feel like im getting closer to something :( even when i was little i thought sm about my body, but now i feel like im finally seeing the progress ive nurtured through learning to be warm to myself again
9 notes
·
View notes
I forget why, but I was on the Wikipedia page for polycystic ovarian syndrome, and I started researching hirsutism in women, and I learned the following things in this order:
there's a diagnostic criteria used to evaluate how hairy a woman is
This is important because being too hairy is a diagnostic criteria of most disorders that cause hyperandrogenism
Disorders that cause hyperandrogenism can be diagnosed by...measuring how hairy you are (this is the main and most important diagnostic criterion for PCOS)
Disorders that cause hyperandrogenism are important because they are correlated with obesity, infertility, and...being too hairy?
I think to myself, wait, what is a normal range for testosterone in women? I find this article...which set reference ranges for "normal" testosterone levels in women...EXCLUDING WOMEN WITH PCOS?
Quote: "Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is another notable condition in genetic (XX) females, which is characterized by excessive ovarian production of androgens. This condition is included for comparison with DSD, as the affected females with PCOS are genetic and phenotypic females. The elevated levels of testosterone in these females can lead to hyperandrogenism, a clinical disorder characterized variably by hirsutism, acne, male-pattern balding, metabolic disturbances, impaired ovulation and infertility. PCOS is a common condition, affecting 7%-10% of premenopausal women."
So: the study claims to demonstrate a clear distinction between the normal range of hormone levels in "Healthy" men and "healthy" women...with "healthy" being defined in the study as...having hormones within the "normal" range.......................
So I researched what the clinically established "normal" range for testosterone in women is
THERE ISN'T ONE????
Quote from the above article: "Several different approaches have been used to define endocrine disorders. The statistical approach establishes the lower and the upper limits of hormone concentrations solely on the basis of the statistical distribution of hormone levels in a healthy reference population. As an illustration, hypo- and hypercalcemia have been defined on the basis of the statistical distribution of serum calcium concentrations. Using this approach, androgen deficiency could be defined as the occurrence of serum testosterone levels that are below the 97.5th percentile of testosterone levels in healthy population of young men. A second approach is to use a threshold hormone concentration below or above which there is high risk of developing adverse health outcomes. This approach has been used to define osteoporosis and hypercholesterolemia. However, we do not know with certainty the thresholds of testosterone levels which are associated with adverse health outcomes."
What the fuck?
What the fuck?
It's batshit crazy to make a diagnostic criteria for medical disorders by placing arbitrary cutoffs within 2-5% of either end of a statistical distribution. What the actual fuck?
"The results came back, you have Statistical Outlier Disease." "What treatments are available?" "Well, first, we recommend dietary change. You should probably stop eating so many spiders."
Another article which attempted to do this
Quote: "Subjects with signs of hirsutism or with a personal history of diabetes or hypertension, or a family history of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) were excluded."
"We're going to figure out the typical range of testosterone levels that occur in women! First, we're going to exclude all the women that are too hairy from the study. I am very good at science."
Anyway I got off topic but there are apparently race-specific diagnostic tools for "hirsutism." That's kinda weird on its own but when I looked more into this in relation to race I found this article that straight-up uses the term "mongoloid"
19K notes
·
View notes
Re: birds in captivity again, another example happened near here recently when a bird from a small falconry experience place escaped, slipped his radio tag and was on the lam for a few days. Everyone kept their eyes out and reported all sightings to the owners, and unlike most stories of escaped parrots (which I never see updates on and fear the worst :( ) this one had a happy ending and they got him back. Then the usual comments came ‘I’m glad you got him back, but he should be in the wild, just my opinion :( ‘ which was pretty funny in this case, as apparently when his falconer arrived with the glove he flew right to it immediately. This suggests he had had quite enough of catching his own food and was ready for reliable meals again. All working falconry birds are expected to work for their rewards so it’s not like he was going to go and sit in an aviary and never stretch his wings again, but all his ‘hunting attempts’ (falconry behaviours) would end in food while with his owners. Seems a better deal to me and in cultures where falconry birds are traditionally released after a few years this is how that’s possible- it’s not taming but an exchange of favours.
Also this bird was a genetic freak of its own, it was an odd looking falcon so once they had him safely back I asked what species he was- turns out he’s an unconventional hybrid between two falcons of different sizes and with completely different hunting methods. Hybridisation of some types is common in falconry but usually of species similar in most ways, and dare I saw it this cross seemed a little gimicky, maybe to try and create a unique bird to make their business stand out a little :( Not sure I’m a huge fan of that kind of thing. But my point is if this bird went wild permanently I’m not sure the 2 completely different hunting methods his parent species use would interact well!!
1 note
·
View note