I've been seeing this quote from the Claudia Gray line from "Master and Apprentice" go around:
Every person Obi-Wan ever truly loved—Anakin, Satine, Padmé, and Qui-Gon himself—came to a terrible end.
And, like, okay, maybe unreliable narrator, but. Tell me you don't know any combat veterans without telling me you don't know any combat veterans.
Because after three years of war, Obi-Wan is going to truly love at least some of his men to the same level as he loves those four.
Christopher Cantwell's Obi-Wan comic gets it. Three of the five issues — which cover more than just the Clone War — show how deeply Obi-Wan cares about the clone troopers he led and served with. And, ahem, how he misses Cody to this day, to be precise.
And, if I'm allowed to get a little "conspiracy Charlie" meme, if "so it goes with my friends, it seems" refers to Anakin also trying to kill him, then Obi-Wan puts his relationship with Cody on the same level as his relationship to Anakin, ergo canonically Obi-Wan also loved Cody in his own way. QED.
i think the dismissal of javi is an interesting decision moving forward like i think next week we'll be shown what it sowed in the cabin for new cruelty to unleash and there i care about travis only, but to me what makes it truly interesting under the light of travis and javi is the reaction of fandom to that death but also to the writing decisions for that to be the choice of it and thus the wilderness... how little javi figured in people's minds like does it speak to the writers inability to make the audience connect with the secondary characters or is it part of the isolation the characters keep wielding as a weapon against each other, is it more fandom's moral failure for dismissing early the brown children, there's still time to sort these things out but regardless that javi's death is the group's first conscious kill we as audience experience almost chronologically with them....
i think it speaks a lot about how twisted the community built around the cult is going to be, as it mirrors times, spaces, and audiences, the yellowjackets have already deemed those too weak, as lottie and shauna saw before of jackie, to be the first ones to go, people have pointed out how convenient that the coach ran away, that javi was left behind, that probably the wilderness would have also chosen those deemed with too much weakness to survive in a show of physical and even spiritual strength (as lottie did by surviving shauna and taissa and natalie's strongheaded narratives of their experiences in the wilderness) to die, and thus: the eugenics of it all, ben scott is disabled, javi is a little brown kid who had already been dismissed on account of being a kid and seemingly at most annoying to them all since no one seems to have even entertained him as a living breathing being besides nat and shauna, and idk whenever survival shows like these are brought up.i often think that it. is very unbecoming that people keep dismissing race in the survival show like white people haven't historically used pseudosciences and any fucking tool of reason within reach to talk to justify social darwinism like i see 😑🤔😒
Just found out about the GO leak. Let's just remember that this was Amazon's fuck up and not the fans, ok? Let's try to not divide into factions of who did the right thing and who didn't cuz this was shared by an official source, so it's absolutely normal for fans to get excited and share it around. You can be upset about the leak but but but let's project that on to saying a big FUCK YOU to Amazon and maybe try to unite and turn this into an opportunity to support the writer's strike. How about that?
Hi my lovelies! I know most of you reading are here just to enjoy your favorite accidental kinslayer but I'd like make a statement regarding the HotD Fandom as a whole.
I've been seeing a lot of anonymous hate going around from both team green and team black stans and this all needs to stop.
Plain and simple: people are allowed to have opinions that differ from your own. That's what makes our world so vibrant and interesting. Life would be much richer if we could see from multiple perspectives and not simply from our own echo chamber.
Regarding Daemon vs Aemond. You all know where I stand and most of you know I find Daemon's character to be repugnant. That is my opinion and I am entitled to it just as you are entitled to disagree with me.
I've had several people who stan Daemon take something I reblogged (post found beneath this one) far too seriously and even stop talking to me because of it. That strikes me as mildly ridiculous, especially because we shouldn't be taking fictional matters so much to heart.
I've never been part of a Fandom so divisive and I wish we could all just take a deep breath, unclench our jaws, and recognize real people matter far more than fictional people.
@misfittcd said; “ If you can’t beat ‘em, yeet ‘em. ” (Luke to Abe)
╰► SOURCE: even more unhinged comedic relief
ABRAHAM GLANCED UP from the dispatch in his hand, BEMUSEMENT dominating his visage.
“Yeet?” The former JEDI MASTER — now PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES — repeated, raising an eyebrow whilst he spoke. “What do you mean by yeet, young man? I have never heard such a word before.”
The pressing issue was land. In the post-Civil War years, Black-freedom advocates such as Edward P. McCabe proposed flooding Indian Territory with Black towns, establishing the demographic foothold for a future Black-majority state. As the chronicler A. G. Stacey wrote at the time, “There is a secret political society in existence . . . which is based upon the principles of Negro advancement, mentally and morally, and the future control of Oklahoma whenever it shall become a state.” The creators of such plans were blind to the concerns of Indians and did not hesitate to align Black and white settlers against them. Frederick Douglass assured a crowd in 1869, “The negro is more like the white man than the Indian, in his tastes and tendencies, and disposition to accept civilization.” Where the Indian “rejects our civilization,” he went on, “it is not so with the negro. He loves you and remains with you, under all circumstances, in slavery and in freedom.”
Gayle is not wrong to name Claude Cox and Alexander Posey as anti-Black racists. The more interesting question, however, is how their racism was shaped by concerns for their people, their polities, and their dwindling land. At the Sequoyah Constitutional Convention of 1905, several tribes sought to establish an Indian state from Indian Territory, bringing a petition to Congress that was swiftly rejected. The secretary to that convention was Posey, a complicated, sometimes contradictory thinker who was devoted to the politics and the aspirations of his tribe. To see his racism clearly is to see a desperate collision between the ambitions of Black and Native peoples.
....
When it comes to belonging, two cultural problems intertwine. Black Creek claims to Creek identity—at least in Gayle’s account—tend to be genealogical, full of blood essentialisms, and sometimes disengaged from the ongoing vitality of Muscogee culture. Figures such as Jake Simmons, Jr., for instance, seem to care most about leveraging Black success out of Native citizenship, leasing and selling Creek land to corporations. At the same time, the historically rooted culture of Muscogee anti-Black racism is not merely abhorrent but unsustainable, offering no path to the future for anyone involved. When it comes to citizenship, two political problems intertwine. Native sovereignty, in the American context, rests upon the legal authority of treaties. So, too, do Black rights to Native membership. The various arguments about Native identity bounce between cultural ties and political claims, all exuding moral authority but none fully authoritative. In this sense, one of Gayle’s maxims proves compelling: Black Creek stories, rich with both the subtleties and the crudenesses of America’s racial history, force us all to contemplate new forms of reckoning.
that poll going around about what labels folks prefer for the queer community has some folks in the notes going "we CAN'T use mogai it has CONNOTATIONS now" and im like... you mean the ones invented by terfs, aphobes, and garden-variety homophobes in order to try and exclude trans and ace/aro ppl and sow discord in the community?
yall gotta stop taking bad-faith actors at face value; they're making you look intolerant.
it was "we can't use mogai bc it could conceivably be used by ppl with paraphilias and fetishes and then no one will take us seriously" and "we can't use lgbtqia+ bc it's too long and confusing and we'll have to add the whole alphabet eventually and then no one will take us seriously" (in order to eventually shorten it further) and now it's "we can't use quiltbag bc it's too cutesy and no one knows it and no one will take us seriously" and all of this began with "queer is a bad, dirty word and people could use it to mean Anything and then no one will take us seriously"
you cannot please these people. there is not a configuration of words that they will find acceptable, no umbrella term that they will not twist to extremes in order to invalidate it, no line they will not cross in order to paint their bigotry as reasonable and the rest of us as predators.
stop giving them ground. stop giving them legitimacy. stop worrying about winning them over. you can't.
If you're not seen or treated as a human being by the society you live in, how can you also be held to the standards of human behavior in that society?
You can't expect oppressed people with restricted rights to exist, and being under constant threat of violence and incarceration simply for being in a targeted demographic, then the social contract expected typically expected of those in that society can't apply to the groups seen as less than human.
Peaceful protests and voting isn't gonna be a valid excuse to stall change at a certain point, and those who seriously suggest it are a threat to liberation, not allies to anyone except their privilege the current system of oppression affords them
I thought readers might like to see the trailer for Divided Loyalties I created for the Historical Novel Society conference.
For the Historical Novel Society conference a few weeks ago, I created a video trailer about Divided Loyalties. My first novel, this Civil War novel follows a young Irish immigrant named Maureen as she figures out how she can come to the aid of her adopted country.
I thought my readers who weren’t in attendance might like to see what I created.
Manga drawn on the cover of my graduationgraduation thesis
“He was extremely wary of 'making. His job is to "say". In fact, he only said But what a lively way of saying it! It was a description that would have been impossible for anyone but someone with abnormal imaginative vision. Sometimes he is so afraid of "creating" that he re-reads what he has already written and cuts out the phrases that he thinks make the historical characters move like real people. Then, the person certainly stops breathing. You don't have to worry about "making" it. But what is "statement" to describe different humans as the same? When he thinks about it, he can't help but make use of the deleted words. After putting it back together and reading it over, he finally calms down. ”
``Ri Ling: Atsushi Nakajima''(中島敦)
What I want to pay attention to is the part of "statement of a different person as a different person". This is where my dissatisfaction with current urban engineering comes from. In other words, what does 500 liters/person/day, which is calculated as the maximum water supply per person per day, mean? There are many types of people in the world, some people use only 100l a day, some fools use 1000l. It's called individuality, but the "basic unit" of 500l/person/day originates from erasing individuality.
The historian Sima Qian's problem still remains relevant today. I absolutely cannot allow a study that kills individuality. The operation of "quantification" is a double-edged sword in that sense. If someone who doesn't know how to use it gets their hands on it, this sword becomes an extremely dangerous weapon.
Phenomena in the natural world are basically curvilinear, and when they tried to replace them with easy-to-understand forms—straight lines—the seeds of Western scientific civilization arose. However, even for the simplest curve, the circle, the π was a number (transcendental numbers) that could not be handled by triangle approximation. The Western conscience has the clarity to make the impossible impossible. But fools assume that a straight line divides all curves. There can only be "destruction"!