#fake AIT | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

forthedancingandthethriving · 1 month

Text

"Seems like Tulip didn't show.." Chester frowns, glancing over at Aite. He and the Prime Minister stood on a balcony overlooking the large party. He leans over the railing, his dark purple suit matching nicely with Aite's more formal wear that was also purple.

"There's always next month." Aite places the tip of her closed man to where the mouth would be on her mask. "But if she doesn't come, it is what it is. Forcing her to meet us would only damage what little trust she has."

"Mrs. Orpheus and Archie are here." Chester glances at her, deciding to change the topic.

"I can only assume he's ensnaring some more poor girls." Aite grips her fan before exhaling.

The two continue to watch, seeing the people below converse and laugh. Talk and mingle.

Fake, all of them. Aite's eyes narrow, anger sparking in her veins. Coming here to suck up, try and put money in the other Ministers' pockets.

She was trying to make a change, yet it was hard. She had authority, and she had power, yet the Ministers below her had their ways, too.

She exhales.

"Hand me the mic."

Chester nods and hands her a headworn microphone. She easily slips it past her hair and slips it under her mask. After checking with Chester that its volume was reasonable, she speaks.

"Thank you, everyone, for showing up once again to a gathering like this."

All attention turns to her. She smiles fakely beneath her mask. "Once again, Renata has never been better. Thanks to the hard work and dedication of everyone present here, Renata still remains on top."

As Aite continues her speech, Chester glances out over the group of people. Names ring in his mind.

The Arisons, the Bamfords, the Fridmans, the Morgans, he runs over the names of the most influential people present before his eyes land on Daisy and Archie Orpheus. And yet, they still don't match the Orpheuses.

Well, except for..

The aide's eyes travel over to a group of people nearly on the opposite side of the room of the Orpheuses. The Burkhearts. Equal in fame, money, and control.

If Chester remembered right, there was an agreement between the two families. Once Tulip came of age and inherited the company, and the same happened for Zeke Burkheart, the heir to the Burkheart family, there would be a wedding for the two, so that the two families could both become more powerful.

Chester holds back a scowl. Arranged marriages were taboo, and Aite was trying her hardest to make them illegal outright, but with such pushback from the upper class, it was hard.

"And of course, I couldn't have achieved half of what I have without Chester's help." Aite's voice pulls him out of his thoughts, and he smiles, dipping his head. Once the applause for him stops, and Aite continues, his eyes land on Zeke Burkheart.

The heir to the Burkheart's had long golden hair tied in a low ponytail, with dark green eyes, and his dark blue suit paired well with the sapphire and silver broach on his chest.

What was amusing was Zeke glaring at Archie and Daisy. Chester had heard through the grape vine that he had apparently lost his mind when Tulip first ran away and purposely wasn't invited to the party where Tulip returned.

It was hard for Chester to tell if Zeke was after the power or had some interest in Tulip.

"..and that concludes all I have to say."

Chester glances at Aite, who begins to slip off the microphone.

"Have a pleasant rest of the party, everyone."

With that, Aite slips off the microphone and hands it to Chester, and they both turn and leave.

"Wonderful job, Aite." Chester chuckles once he's turned off the microphone.

"That leaves me exhausted every time." Aite shakes her head. "I'm so peeved those damn Ministers made me do a solo speech." She exhales. "These parties always suck."

The aide chuckles. "Shall I get you some coffee then?"

"Please."

"Of course."

#oc: chester #oc: aite #fanfiction: my writing!#!posts!

4 notes · View notes

maxverstepponme · 2 months

Note

ait those kelly at the gym pics in dubai are supposed to be paparazzi pics??? GIRL BYEEE

why does she think those are believeable//

Especially since paparazzi are prohibited in Dubai. They would never have been able to fit into the gym. This proves that she organized everything once again. Plus it's so obvious that she poses for the cameras. She is so stupid and not subtle. She could at least find out when she makes her pathetic plans to attract attention. She's so lazy. This isn't the first time she's organized a fake paparazzi session, she never learns from her mistakes. Besides, which paparazzi would like to take a photo of her, no one knows her. Outside of F1 she doesn't exist and even there it's only thanks to Max, without him no one pays attention to her. She is so pathetic that we almost feel sorry for her.

She’s horrible at it 😭 her agency needs to either teach her how to fake pap pics or stop paying for those articles. It’s embarrassing.

5 notes · View notes

doriangray1789 · 2 months

Text

SOSYAL MEDYADA KATEGORİK ANDAVALLAR İLE TANIŞMA SÜRECİN

Antonio Gramsci , Önemsediğim bir zekadır. Hayatı ve fikirleri dikkatimi çekmiştir. Çözümlemelerini çalışmışımdır. Kitaplarını okumuşumdur. Olduğu gibi her söylediğini kabul etmem ama zekasına hayranlık duyuyorum, profilimde de bu ismi kullanmak isterdim..bir ara İsim olarak Walter Benjamin, Gramsci isminde sosyal medya hesabı açmıştım. Sonra kapattım

neden?

ilk twt a kaybolduğumda vay canına ne güzel kızlar ne yakışıklı tipler var demiş yukarıda saydığım isimlerin resimleri yerine kendi fotoğrafımı pp olarak kullanmaya karar vermiştim sonra da bu durum devam etti hemen her platformda kendi fotolarımı kullandım ! Sosyal medyada biraz tevrübelenince de “fake” kavramını öğrendim

bana yazanların çoğu beni kendi gibi sandığından Google dan resmimi aratanlar kanıt isteyenler dm den şimdi Çek foto gönder diyenler saçma sapan bir sürü davranış

Linkedin hariç (orada gerçek ismimle kayıtlıyım) diğer tüm sosyal medya platformlarında aynı-> Dorian Gray.

Bu isim, üzerinde uzun süre düşündüm, kitabı anlatan yazılar yazdım, sürekli olarak çevresinde kendi çapımda fikirsel üretimde bulundum, kimseyle paylaşmadığım, evimde cinnet köşesi dediğim köşede sayısız sayfadan oluşan ve bana ait bir arşiv oluştu.

Kimse bilmezdi taki bu arşivimi sosyal medyaya açana kadar.. paylaşmaya başladım. Yazılarım benden size ulaşan güzellik oldu bense onlara ruh oldum.. Dorian Gray adını seçmenin sebebi de budur..

Yazdıkça resmimle ilgilenen kitle yerine, düşüncemle ilgilenen kitleyle tanıştık oldum…

ama diğer kitle aynı kitle olarak kaldı Hatta anlat bakalım neymiş benim fikrim dediğinizde, benim bile toparlamak ve izah etmekte zorlanacağım bir durum da oluveriyor. Çünkü hala pek çok sorunlu tip var. Ben nelerden bahsediyorum o hala “Bu senmisin” derdinde bu soru en bilindik soru mesela. EVET KARDEŞİM BENİM … NAPICAN…

İnsanlar profilime bakarlar ilgi alanlarımı görür yazdıklarımı okur fikirsel dikotomi yapar vs Kategorik andaval ise profilime bakıyor. Orada Dorian Gray İ görüyor ama o kim tanımıyor. Herhangi bir felsefeciyi de yazsaydım (yine felsefeciyim deyip de o isimleri tanımayacak sayısız insan görürdüm o kesin) Kategorik andaval pekala tanımayacaktı. Ama saçlar duruşum filan. Bunda bir zeki adam imajı var. Acaba derkeeeen, Dorian Gray yazısını görüyor. Oooo komünist bu! Komünistse bölücü! Bölücüyse şu partili. Bu partiliyse şuralı... Çünkü beyni, ancak böyle basit ve saçma bağlantılar kurabilecek kadar kıvrım sahibi! Bu topraklar üzerinde, özgür düşünebilen insanların varlığını kabul etmiyor!

Özgür düşünebilen, kendi zeka kapasitesi içinde yoğrulan insanların memleketini sevebileceği ihtimalini gözetmiyor!

Bu memleketi ve bu memleketin kültürünü sahiplenebilmiş olma durumunu idrak edemiyor!

genelde PP olarak kullandığı üç hilal, tek hilal, kurt, Mustafa Kemal, İsmail Enver ve benzer kişi ve sembollerin onu benden daha vatan sever yaptığını sanıyor! Bu sanma halini, daha doğrusu bu aptallık halini kendi içinde yaşasa çok sorun değil. Gelip mesajlardan da ne kadar aptal olduğuyla ilgili argümanlar sunmaya kalkıyor. Bu yapmayın. Aptallığınızın seviyesini ölçebilecek kadar zeki değilim! Beni kategorize edebileceğin, kendi aptal hegemonyan altına alabileceğin, ideolojik bataklığına saplayabileceğin kadar da aptal değilim!

2 notes · View notes

jloisse · 11 months

Text

Trump: «Nous chasserons les mondialistes, cette classe politique malade et les fake news médias» du pouvoir

«L’Ukraine est l'une des pires choses que l'on ait jamais vues», a dénoncé Trump.

«Notre monnaie s'effondre, nous sommes une nation défaillante, une nation en déclin», a-t-il déploré, appelant à chasser les «fauteurs de guerre» et «Biden le corrompu» du gouvernement.

«Biden, ce zombie ambulant, tente d’emprisonner son opposant politique numéro un, comme dans la Russie de Staline»

Poursuivi par l'Etat profond, victime d'une révolution colorée à domicile en 2020, l’ex-président fait face à 37 chefs d’accusation et risque 20 ans de prison.

«Je ne céderai jamais, je ne serai jamais vaincu. Je n'arrêterai jamais de me battre pour vous.»

#trump news #president trump #trump #donald trump #donald j trump #maga2024 #trump 2024 #biden corruption #president biden #biden administration #biden economy #joe biden #deep state #fake news #mainstream #mass media #medias #traditional media

6 notes · View notes

dodger-chan · 9 months

Text

Thoughts on Herlock Sholmès arrive trop tard (1/3)

(yes, only part one; I had family visiting and I'm very behind on all of my book clubs)

I am never not going to laugh about Herlock Sholmès, the guy who is definitely not Sherlock Holmes. It's way too silly.

C’est étrange ce que vous ressemblez à Arsène Lupin, Velmont !

Well, I guess we know who Lupin is in this story. Though maybe Leblanc is writing a double fake out, and Velmont really is a look-a-like.

si vous n’étiez pas le peintre connu dont j’admire les belles marines

Lupin can do everything else, why not be a well-known artist, too?

Des bahuts et des crédences

There are credenzas and credenzas, apparently. I'd check a better dictionary, but honestly I don't know what different types of credenza might exist, and it wouldn't help me build a more accurate mental picture of the room.

devise - motto

« Fais ce que veulx. »

Do what you want. An interesting family motto. Should be Lupin's, I think.

Une indiscrétion n’est plus à craindre.

Um...you sure about that, Devanne? I was willing to cut you a break for not realizing the guy who looks like Lupin is Lupin, because you don't know you're in a Lupin story, but this is pretty dumb.

Herlock Sholmès, le grand policier anglais pour qui il n’est point de mystère, Herlock Sholmès, le plus extraordinaire déchiffreur d’énigmes que l’on ait jamais vu, le prodigieux personnage qui semble forgé de toutes pièces par l’imagination d’un romancier, Herlock Sholmès

Totally not Sherlock Holmes, legally.

se tourner les pouces - twiddle his thumbs

le 7 thermidor an II - This is a date from the French Republican calendar, making the date (it seems) July 26 or 27 of 1793. As to why this system of dating would be used here? No clue.

<< La hache tournoie dans l’air qui frémit, mais l’aile s’ouvre, et l’on va jusqu’à Dieu. >>

Ah, yes, a secret code. Is there a transcription error? Because I'm not seeing anything about the bird that's mentioned later.

À moins qu’Arsène Lupin ne le devance.

Too late.

Sans perdre une seconde ! ne faut-il pas que cette nuit, c’est-à-dire avant l’arrivée de Herlock Sholmès, je cambriole votre château.

He's literally just said he's robbing the place, and Devanne still doesn't know he's Lupin

En quarante minutes, le salon fut « désencombré » selon l’expression d’Arsène.

Lupin is a bit of a shit, isn't he? Decluttered.

Miss Nelly ! la passagère du Transatlantique

The romantic interest from the first story. Nice to see her again.

Alors, se décidant brusquement, il laissa tomber sur le fauteuil une partie des objets, vida ses poches et se défit de son sac.

Dude, really?

— À trois heures, demain, tout sera remis en place… Les meubles seront rapportés…

I really don't get it. I mean, I get that he doesn't want her to be scared of him, but what does that have to do with him returning everything he stole?

And, of course, we don't see M. Sholmès in this instalment, as he arrives too late.

#arsène lupin gentleman cambrioleur #arsène lupin #romans feuilletons

3 notes · View notes

sebsxphia · 1 year

Note

Shuffle your favorite playlist and post the first five songs that come up. Then copy/paste this ask to your favorite mutuals. 🎶🎧💜💙🤗

aite, this is my bobby and rhett playlist!!

unchained melody - the righteous brothers

i think i like it - fake blood (this maybe out of touch for them, but i listened to it on repeat whilst writing ‘pushing his buttons’)

chateau lobby - father john misty

dark red - steve lacy

dedicated to the one i love - the mamas & the papas

thank you so much for this my love!! this was a lot of fun 🥹💌

#💌you’ve got mail #wkndwlff <33 #rhett abbott #robert bob floyd

7 notes · View notes

phytine · 2 years

Text

Perrault’s “Cendrillon”

So, why do I want to speak about Cinderella on this website? Because I see way too much bullshit about it going around. Especially when it’s about Disney animated version. Because yeah, Disney indeed sanitized quite a bit the version they took inspiration from to make their own, for children. But not the way you think they had done it. They did not suppress violence. They did not need to: they took Perrault’s version of Cinderella, not the Brother Grimm’s one.

So, in this post, we are going to talk about Perrault’s version of Cinderella, or “Cendrillon ou la petite pantoufle de verre*”. Because I'm pretty sure you most likely do not have a complete reading of this tale.

*I want to clarify here that, verre = glass. The idea that it was in another fabric comes from XIXs century's authors who thought it did not make sense and thus said that it was a mistake and that it was “vair” (which is a type of fur) because you know, fairy tales had to be realistic… ANYWAY.

N.B.: English is not my first language so bear with me the mistakes.

1. Charles Perrault did not write tales for children (and without adding gore for that)

Yes, because before we talk about the tale, we have to do some context. It’s very important.

Okay, so repeat after me, “Charles Perrault did not write tales for children.”

I know, you are going to think that I think it’s because they were trash or something, thus not good for children. It’s not for this reason.

Charles Perrault wrote tales for the French high-society circle. He wrote his tales at the end of XVIIs century (“Cendrillon” was published in 1697). At this time, tales were not thought for children but for everyone (I'm not going to expand on the oral tradition of tales in France in the XVIIs century, sorry, but keep in mind it was oral, and not specific to old women).

Now, don’t get me wrong, Perrault did everything to make you believe it was for children. He called it “Contes de ma mère l’oye” at first, which is a way to create the idea that these tales were just stories he heard from old women. Yes, it’s the old storyteller cliché. I mean, he even put this frontispiece to really, really, be sure you understand:

He even went as far as telling it’s his own son who wrote them and put a dedication where his son (Pierre) was saying :

“On ne trouvera pas étrange qu’un Enfant ait pris plaisir à composer les Contes de ce Recueil […].”

“Nobody will find strange that a child took pleasure in composing this tales collection […].”

(At this time, Pierre was 19 and you have to take into account that childhood was not perceived the same way as today – and teenage years just did not exist. At the time, childhood was considered a lack. When you were a child, you were lacking something – something you would gain in adulthood. So, at 19, Pierre was not considered a child.)

So why I’m saying that it’s just a stratagem.

Because what Perrault did is called a "jeu mondain". People in literary circles were playing at this, composing poetry, little stories, and other texts to entertain each other. It's especially true in Perrault's epoch: numerous writers, especially women, were writing tales for this circle. For example, the first one who used the term “Conte de fees” (“Fairy Tale”) was Madame d’Aulnoy. And we also have several versions of the same stories from different people who were playing a game: with the same beginning, do your own story (Perrault did that with his niece and another woman, don’t remember who).

Perrault's writing might look simple. It's anything but. I'm not going to talk in detail about it but basically, he imitates oral and popular style. But at the same time, he did it with enough talent to make it okay for the high society to read. It’s a very elaborate fake popular style.

It’s a way for his readers to appreciate some “low” style with a bit of distance. They laugh but they understood Perrault’s mirth behind his tales. It’s not for children or the masses, far from it.

That's also why it's for adults but you will not find gore or something: it would have been absolutely abhorrent for people of this circle. A few salacious jokes, okay. If you do it right. But more? Oh god, no. A lot of women around Perrault were part of the preciosity. Make your heroin having her eyes tear off and they would have judged you sooo much.

(On top of that, you have to notice that general, tales for children of this time are about children… most of Perrault's ones aren't. They are about young men, and especially young women… like the ones he meets in his social circle, and who are listening ?)

2. Perrault’s tales’ pretty messed up moralities (on purpose)

This leads us to this point: Perrault did not make moral tales. Or at least, not in the way we might perceive them today.

Oh, of course, like for the children thing, he went really hard to make you believe it in the paratext.

You have to understand that tale was a low genre in the French tradition (to make it short, Tragedy, Poetry, and Epic poems were the big YES because they came from Antiquities with noble subjects, when Tales, Novels, and Comedy were the big You're a joke of a writer). That's why Perrault used the same technic as La Fontaine to make it nobler: he used the didactic strategy.

I mean, if it’s here to make you learn something, it’s way better than just entertainment, right? Yes, things never changed. That’s why Perrault was selling it as a didactic thing.

However, he might sell it as much as he wants, he can’t hide the content he produces, right?

Have you ever read Perrault’s moralities at the end of the tales? They are WILD.

Sometimes there is one morality and it has nothing to do with the tale. Sometimes there are two of them and they contradict each other. Sometimes they are just mocking you and/or society. At no point was Perrault like "yes, that's the meaning of my text, FOLLOW IT TO THE LETTERS".

See this example from “La Barbe Bleue” (Blue Beard) :

« Moralité

La curiosité malgré tous ses attraits,

Coûte souvent bien des regrets ;

On en voit tous les jours mille exemples paraître.

C’est, n’en déplaise au sexe, un plaisir bien léger ;

Dès qu’on le prend il cesse d’être,

Et toujours il coûte trop cher.

Autre moralité

Pour peu qu’on ait l’esprit sensé,

Et que du Monde on sache le grimoire,

On voit bientôt que cette histoire

Est un conte du temps passé ;

Il n’est plus d’Epoux si terrible,

Ni qui demande l’impossible,

Fût-il malcontent et jaloux.

Près de sa femme on le voit filer doux ;

Et de quelque couleur que sa barbe puisse être,

On a peine à juger qui des deux est le maître. »

In the first one, Perrault is saying that women are very curious beings and that it's bad behavior. In the second one, Perrault is saying that fortunately, nobody is that bad of a husband today and that even if they were, men are submitting to their wives.

(You have to take into account that Perrault was… feminist might be anachronistic, but he fought for women's education, etc. He even wrote a treaty during a famous quarrel between two camps in French literature. The dude was here to stay.)

So which moral do you take into account? And more than that, the tale in itself does not give you the answer because it can be read as a wedding between nobility and the bourgeoisie (a big problem at the time). And that’s just an example.

In another one, he is going to say that you have to be intelligent to become something in life but then just after he will be like "well… I say that but better have a good heritage. It works better.”.

You can consider that tales have for goal to teach you something. Perrault’s ones do not. And it’s logic you know: it’s not for children. Whose aristocrats would like to entertain themselves by learning some morals when it is normally about trying to outsmart everyone?

3. “Cendrillon ou la petite pantoufle de verre” or “The strategy to find a good husband”

When you read “Cendrillon” for the first time, you can easily understand it as the following: be good and you will be rewarded. It’s a “nice things happen to nice people” situation, as a reward for being nice to everyone, Cendrillon marries the Prince.

That’s what you can understand from the first morality.

« Moralité

La beauté pour le sexe est un rare trésor,

De l’admirer jamais on ne se lasse ;

Mais ce qu’on nomme bonne grâce

Est sans prix, et vaut mieux encor.

C’est ce qu’à Cendrillon fit avoir sa Marraine,

En la dressant, en l’instruisant,

Tant et si bien qu’elle en fit une Reine :

(Car ainsi sur ce Conte on va moralisant.)

Belles, ce dont vaut mieux que d’être bien coiffées,

Pour engager un cœur, pour en venir à bout,

La bonne grâce est le vrai don des Fées ;

Sans elle on ne peut rien, avec elle, on peut tout. »

And on top of that, her short presentation emphasizes these characteristics :

« Le mari avait de son côté une jeune fille, mais d’une douceur et d’une bonté sans exemple ; elle tenait cela de sa Mère, qui était la meilleure personne du monde. »

« The husband had one young girl, whose gentleness and kindness were without equal; she was inheriting it from her Mother, who was the best person in the world.”

She is beautiful but most importantly, she is kind.

But there is another reading, of course. Another layer. There is always one in Perrault’s tale. Is Cendrillon just kind? Is it the only reason she is rewarded in the end? Kindness is not naivety.

The answer is linked to the second morality.

« Autre Moralité

C’est sans doute un grand avantage,

D’avoir de l’esprit, du courage,

De la naissance, du bon sens,

Et d’autres semblables talents,

Qu’on reçoit du Ciel en partage ;

Mais vous aurez beau les avoir,

Pour votre avancement ce seront choses vaines,

Si vous n’avez, pour les faire valoir,

Ou des parrains ou des marraines. »

So, it's saying that it's great to be good, intelligent, and beautiful but if you want something, better count on having someone to help you and be able to strategize for your social climbing, you know.

Yes, you can read Perrault’s Cendrillon as a girl who is not that honest but who is well aware of what she needs to do to live a good life.

That’s what I meant when I said that your “girl boss” Cendrillon may exist but not in the way you hoped for. Through the tale, you can interpret her behavior as a way to go to the ball to seduce the prince or at least find a good husband.

Yes, Cendrillon is good and nice. But she is also very aware of the situation she is in. For example, on one hand, this is the dialogue between Cendrillon and her sister:

« En les coiffant, elles lui disaient : "Cendrillon, serait-tu bien aise d’aller au Bal ? – Hélas, Mesdemoiselles, vous vous moquez de moi, ce n’est pas là ce qu’il me faut. – Tu as raison, on rirait bien si on voyait un Cucendron aller au Bal." »

“While doing their hair, they were saying: “Cendrillon, would you be pleased to go to the ball? – Alas, misses, you are making fun of me, it is not what I need. – You are right, we would laugh well if we were to see a Cucendron go to the ball.”

On the other hand, here is the conversation with her fairy godmother just after her half-sisters leave:

« Sa Marraine, qui la vit toute en pleurs, lui demande ce qu’elle avait. "Je voudrais bien… je voudrais bien…" Elle pleurait si fort qu’elle ne put achever. Sa Marraine, qui était Fée, lui dit : "Tu voudrais bien aller au Bal, n’est-ce pas ? – Hélas oui, dit Cendrillon en soupirant." »

“Her godmother, who saw her in tears, asked her what was happening. “I would like to… I would like to…” She was crying so hard that she could not finish. Her godmother, who was Fairy, said to her: “You would like to go to the ball, wouldn’t you? – Alas yes, said Cendrillon, sighing.””

Do you see the difference? She lies to her sisters by saying it's not what she “needs” (“ce qu’il me faut”) when it’s clearly what she wants. But she knows very well who she can tell and who she can't. This dissimulative behavior continues when she teases her sisters about the beautiful woman (her) they meet at the ball. At this point, Cendrillon asks one of them if she could lend her a dress to go with her. Of course, the sister refuses, and here is Cendrillon’s reaction:

« Cendrillon s’attendait bien à ce refus et elle en fut bien aise, car elle aurait été grandement embarrassée si sa sœur eût bien voulu lui prêter son habit. »

« Cendrillon expected well this refusal et she was pleased about it because she would have been greatly embarrassed if her sister had accepted to lend him her clothes.”

She knew pretty well and she is playing with her sisters. She is not naïve and she already has a plan for the following night, to meet again the prince. And she plays so well her game that she wins in the end: she marries the prince.

So yes, Cendrillon is good but she can also be scheming. Both are possible. You can see it, especially at the end. After being married, she forgives her mean half-sisters :

« Cendrillon, qui était aussi bonne que belle, fit loger ses deux sœurs au Palais, et les maria dès le jour même à deux grands Seigneurs de la Cour. »

« Cendrillon, who was as good as beautiful, made her two sisters stay in the Palace, and married them on the same day to two high lords of the Court.”

She knows that what is needed for women in her time is a good marriage. And that’s why she also gave it to her sisters after she has her own. Elle ne perd pas le nord.

And that’s why I like this character and tale. Well, Perrault’s version of it.

It's funny because when everyone criticizes Cendrillon as this nice but naïve and quite dumb girl in the end, I’m like no? She isn’t? And no need to have gore for that. No need to add blood and torture. You just have to take into account the context she is living in and how she manipulates it to her own advantage while staying true to her goodness.

So maybe, before criticizing fairy tales, making them simpler and dumber than they are, just put them in their context. Especially when it comes to moralities.

Authors lie all the damn time and Perrault is very good at it. He is part of the wittiest circle of his country’s epoch, after all.

And if you are interested (and you speak French, sorry), I would suggest you read the following books on the subject:

BRIERE-HAQUET Alice, Politique des contes – Il était une fois Perrault aujourd’hui…, Paris : Classiques Garnier, 2021, 168p.

ESCOLA Marc, Contes de Charles Perrault, Editions Gallimard, 2005, 235p.

SIMONSEN Michèle, Perrault – Contes, Paris : Presses Universitaires de France, 1992, 124p.

SORIANO Marc, Les Contes de Perrault – Culture savante et traditions populaires, Gallimard, 1968, 525p.

#charles perrault #perrault #Perrault's cinderella #Cendrillon #I'm not specialized in Perrault's work but the last post I saw was the last straw I'm sorry #I hope it was understandable #Don't let me in university library I'm reading way too much on random subject #I could have go on about Perrault's influence in la querelle des anciens et des modernes and how it influences his work #but well it's long enough #balise

14 notes · View notes

heranin-kalbi · 1 year

Text

Gözlerimin gözlediği yolları gözlerin gözleseydi gözlerimle gözlerin göz göze gelirdi (neyse o değil de fake gibi ama değil halis mulis bana ait lan olm benim gözüm ne güzelmiş aw canım gözüm) 👁👁

1 note · View note

anindaonayli · 2 years

Text

anindaonay.org - Devasa+.

Sosyal medya hesaplarında aktif olmak ve güvenilir profil çizmek için sms onay işlemlerinin gerçekleştirilmesi gerekir. Öyle ki bu işlemin gerçekleştirilmesinde profesyonellik son derece önemli olduğu kadar işlemin nasıl gerçekleştirilmesi gerektiğine yönelik adımların da en doğru şekilde takip edilmesi de çok önemlidir. Mobil onay alarak, sosyal medya ağlarında bir çok kullanım hakkı ve özelliklere elde edilmektedir. Mobil olarak numara doğrulayabilmek için kişiler farklı hesaplar açabileceği gibi, kendi numaralarının dışında birbirinden farklı numaralar kullanarak da yani fake numara alma yöntemiyle de gizlilikleri korumak mümkün olacaktır. Peki mobil onay nerelerde kullanılıyor? Sanal numara alma yöntemleri nelerdir?

Mobil onay genel olarak Whatsapp, Facebook, İnstagram, Twitter, Google ve de Hotmail gibi sosyal ağlar birlikte olmak üzere birbirinden farklı servislerde de online olarak tercih ediliyor. Numara doğruma aslına bakıldığında son derece basit bir işlemdir. Fake numara almak için en geçerli yöntem ise bu alanda hizmet veren mobil ve sms onay web sayfalarından hizmet almaktır. Fakat telefon onay kodu alabilmek için güvenilir platformları tercih etmek de oldukça önemlidir. Böylece en güvenilir yöntemlerle hesap onayı almak da mümkün olacaktır.

1K notes · View notes

lailuhhh · 1 year

Note

my experience is that you enlist for 4 years at a time (usually with a 4 year commitment to the reserves after that.) Occasionally, and this is happening more in recent years, I've seen and heard of 2 or 3 year enlistments. Between BCT, AIT and EOD it's about 50+ weeks of training. A deployment is anywhere from 6-15 months with time at home in between. Where does it say that Mac was on his third deployment when he met Jack?

In 1x06 Wrench no exact years are used, but Mac is at the EOD training grounds with Pena "6 years ago" which makes it 2010. (since the episode aired in 2016) Pena is killed "5 Years Ago" making it 2011. In 3x06 the date is given 6/27/2011. The day of 1000 IEDs was (according to 3x06) two weeks before Pena's death. In that episode Mac says he'd only been in country for 3 months prior to Pena's death. He meets Jack in 2011. Jack says Mac "got his training officer killed." Training officers aren't often deploying to Afghanistan since their roles are to teach and train. The implication that Mac was working in country with his training officer means he hasn't had multiple deployments at this point. (and he flat out wouldn't have had time if he was in EOD training in 2010)

In the pilot Mac says he spent "three years defusing bombs for the military" and while technically his time shouldn't "count" until he graduates BCT, AIT, and EOD I'm thinking for ease of explanation he is counting those years since his first mission with DXS in Jakarta (3x12 Mac + Fallout + Jack) takes place in 2012. Either way, the minimum enlisted age is 17 with parental consent, which gets fuzzy because who had custody over Mac? Someone needs to have guardianship. It's possible he's emancipated but that too gets complicated. But we avoid that issue by having Mac enlist around 2009-2010ish according to the years given to us in the show.

Who is paying for MIT? a 17 year old can't sign for a loan. There are very very few "full rides" unless James made some kind of fake endowment or scholarship program and awarded it to Mac. Perhaps he tasked an underling with that, but it seems unlikely he went through that much effort. I'm sorry, no school anywhere is letting a 6 year old into fifth grade. Schools are reluctant to let kids skip a single grade, and even though I can see James being an ass about it, I don't think he'd intervene. He'd want Mac to skip based on "merit" not because he went down to the school and threw a temper tantrum. Again, it would be too much effort on James part. the fifth grade teacher is not prepared for the lack of fine motor skills or emotional maturity of a six year old suddenly in their class. Even if Mac is smart enough to skip, there are a lot of social skills and motor skills that are developed in early grades. Even a "young" first grader need more help with things like holding a pencil or using scissors than a "older" first grader. (ie think a first grader who turned six in July prior to school starting versus a first grader who is going to turn 7 just a few weeks after school starts. Those nine months have an enormous difference)

So many he skips one grade. Maybe he graduates early after taking extra classes. Maybe he even starts taking college credits in high school. He's probably not much more than a year or depending on birthdays twoish younger than bozer. But still young enough to be a younger brother. still potentially the same age as Josh would have been.

The MacGyver canon timeline is pretty shit though. They can't keep anything straight. Mac says the KGB was disbanded before he was born so he should actually have a birthday in 1992!

#hello yes thank you #this is very informative #thank you #not gonna lie I need to watch it all again to get the juices going #we just gonna stick with fanon lore from now on #lailuh speaks #macgyver #macgyver 2016 #ask #answer #anon ask #thanks again anon

2 notes · View notes