SYNASTRY / COMPOSITE
yall help me 😭 im embarrassing myself here 🤕 so theres this guy that im talking with lately and tbh hes not exactly my physical type ? but he kinda makes me feel thingsss. but goddd we alws clash. debates, arguments etc. i feel like hes easily triggered ? also that he projects a lot on me but doesnt realise it. i tell him, “ure not in the wrong, im not either- its just were different.” lmao. we def have diff communication styles. he doesnt rly get my humour too. vice versa. i find his lame. anyways i dont think were compatible but god he kinda idk somehow turns me on lmao. i blamed it on my periods n all but i cant really deny it lmao. he definitely gets on my nerves. hes annoying ugh. he also admits that he likes getting on my nerves. but i oddly find myself wanting to talk w him despite all thAt. we kinda talk evry night so maybe its just bc its kind of become like a part of my routine ? idk but i gotta say, when things get kinda good- theyre p good ? but whn theyre bad, theyre bad. like i feel like blocking him and putting an end to everything. just now too, we were kinda talking good in the beginning but then that man got annoying and he so easily gets triggered man. ih8 how hes so sensitive. i dont even explain myself anymore lmao, ijust ignore it and jump to another thing.
anyways, now i need to know just what the heck is going on in our charts ? does he find me attractive ? ( physically lol ) is this attraction / underlying attraction (?) lmao i feel, mutual ? whether he feel turned on too or is it just me lmao. please if this aint mutual, im gonna ghost n block is2g. also he keeps asking me out on a date, i always reject ofc. do yall think i should give this a try or just let it finish here. o and idk if this means anything, but ithink he finds my hands attractive ? lol. o and another question that i hv, is he attracted to my voice ? he also wants to talk on call n all but i deny lol. im curious.
im the capricorn. he’s scorpio.
17 notes
·
View notes
really sad to say this but i dont think i'll be using the word "posic" to describe my experiences with object sapience anymore. recently found out people who do not experience object consciousness, but "want to" or "think it should be real" are using the label and i refuse to associate my trauma with that. honestly i think it would be better if a new label was made for that but its not my problem. im sad to say this as ive loved the posic community since the beginning and have been a proud member
i also fear that continuously using "posic" to describe my relationship to objects cute-ifies my delusional companion syndrome which is actually a very fucking traumatic illness to live with and i dont want to keep feeling like im romanticizing or discrediting my own experiences, and i especially do not want to accidentally associate myself and my trauma with someone who is ultimately a complete outsider to my experience (or worse yet, desires to live my actual trauma lol but i highly doubt anyone is this insane)
to be clear i dont dislike people who "want" object sapience, i just dont agree with them using a preexisting word that describes the intimate experiences of other people to describe their identity. i dont have to tell you this but doing that really doesnt make sense. i dont like the idea of sharing what is meant to be close-knit spaces with someone like that. it feels to me like my sacred space is being invaded. in reality whether im right or wrong doesnt matter, i just wont be in that space anymore :0)
all DCS related posts will be tagged with DCS specific tags and no longer posic tags
7 notes
·
View notes
quastion. if you were a high schooler looking to take the least stressful lab science would you taking physics or chemistry
i think this is a simpler question of which do you enjoy more? for me i would choose physics over chemistry any day but that’s because i hate chemistry and so all chem labs i took were boring and stressful, and i love physics so the labs were fun and interesting
however if both subjects are equally uninteresting to you, then i do recommend physics! maybe i'm biased, but i think even personal interest aside, my high school chem labs were definitely more involved and complicated than my high school physics labs. physics experiments in lower level classes such as high school (and even introductory college physics to some extent) are pretty simple to set up and conduct, the main understanding comes from doing the math afterwards to get any sort of result out of it, whereas chem was more like, actually mixing stuff and then observing
not only were physics labs easier, simpler, and more engaging, but each lab also was unique and distinct from each other. i really can only recall the same basic setup of like, mixing stuff together as the idea behind every single chem lab i did. the exact way you mixed them together differed of course but that was the main idea
meanwhile some examples of physics labs i recall from high school include:
projectile motion: most likely you will roll a marble down a ramp off the edge of the lab table, measure the horizontal and vertical distances it traveled, maybe time it also or use a photogate to measure the velocity, or something, and then use the kinematic equations to find any missing variables, and then through all that you will probably be to told to find the value of g, what is known as the acceleration due to gravity, aka the rate at which things fall.
circular motion: you may be using a FLYING PIG to demonstrate circular motion!!! figuring out the tension in the string, the idea of centripetal force, centripetal acceleration, rates of revolution, etc.
harmonic motion: push some slinkies around, demonstrate hooke's law and spring force, calculation of frequency and oscillation, maybe observing resonant frequencies and resonant modes
standing waves: using some sort of low tech version of a standing wave generator to observe, well, standing waves. the high school version of this lab i believe was very surface level and was mostly just drawing how different standing waves looked, counting the nodes and antinodes, and predicting it for different frequencies. i think the teacher even got us a giant rope and we had to recreate the lower frequency standing waves together as a class by just oscillating it ourselves
all around, in my experience at least, high school physics labs are so much more involved and engaging than chem ever was. and while the math involved in the physics class was more daunting than chem, it was such a fun and interactive class. and again i may be biased but i think, if both chem and physics are uninteresting to you but you need to choose one anyway, i think having a basic background in physics is a lot more useful and goes a lot further than a basic background in chem does. i truly believe that knowing stuff about the kinematic equations, circular motion, free body diagrams, harmonic motion, etc etc will enrich your life further and change the way you see the world around you. high school physics will not make you an expert but it can certainly make observing patterns in life and how the natural world operates a lot more fun and exciting
2 notes
·
View notes