Tumgik
#Marian Goodman
pikasus-artenews · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
Robby Müller: Polaroïds
Memorie intime ma ricche di effetti di luce nelle polaroid di Robby Müller, uno dei più apprezzati direttori della fotografia nel mondo cinematografico
0 notes
thingstol00kat · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Ríneke Djikstra at Marian Goodman gallery
Nov 2023
0 notes
garadinervi · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
Bernar Venet, Exploited Subjects, (artist's book, offset printed, from a portfolio of nineteen printed objects), Multiples, Inc., New York, NY, 1970 [© Bernar Venet / ARS, New York / ADAGP, Paris]
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Sources: Artists' Books and Multiples, Sackville, New Brunswick; Printed Matter, Inc., New York, NY; MoMA, New York, NY; Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Marian Goodman Gallery, New York, NY and Paris
34 notes · View notes
antronaut · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Gabriel Orozco
Covid 30.6.20 (2020)
Covid 27.7.20 (2020)
45 notes · View notes
lsdslsd · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
4 notes · View notes
restrictedpalette · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Christian Boltanski (French, 1944-2021) at Marian Goodman Gallery
1 note · View note
octavio-world · 27 days
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Forgot this was still in the queue! Delcy Morales & Ettore Spalletti Esa equina soy yo at Marian Goodman Gallery
1 note · View note
Text
Engaging The Community Part 1
Hello "Community" I am engaging with you, have you heard? No? That's because this is my first blog post and I have spent exactly zero time attempting to build a community of any kind. Now if I said "Hello community, I am building you and engaging with you simultaneously" doesn't that make more sense? Yes? You're wrong, it still doesn't make any sense, but we'll get there soon enough. Anyway thats my "hook", to use a little bit of 5th grade, persuasive essay, bullshit. But the hook can't last forever, if I'm doing this right, I'm about to begin my "Introductory Paragraph."
Anyone invested in the gallery side of the fine arts is probably familiar with some form of the phrase "engaging with the community", it is as present in calls for entry, as it is in the entries they're calling for. It seems as though any gallery worth a damn is neurotically concerned with the amount of engagement that the community is receiving, as if this speculative community is not a group of people, but instead a large dog living in a tiny apartment, ADHD symptomatic and morbidly devoid of enrichment. It is up to the brave souls, in the field of arts administration, to help these abused dogs by any means necessary. Maybe they're capable of doing that. The question to whom are they are doing this is probably something worth speculating about, and how they're planning to do it seems just as tied to the dog's well being. Those two concerns are what I will, hopefully, be describing.
If we're going to go about setting up our 501-C3 rescue shelter masquerading as an art gallery, we should probably figure out who the dogs are to begin with. "OH GOD" I hear you shriek from your seat on the subway "He's going to cite the fucking dictionary, he's just going to give us the dictionary definition of 'community' I knew he was a hack! A conversational tone is a RED FLAG" That's right, dumbshit, get ready for a hastily googled "community definition." According to the Oxford dictionary, community is a word with 3 definitions, which are subdivided into 10 contextual definitions, very useful, let me choose one that suits my purposes as a critic. I'll just go with the first one since its applicable to most situations, the 3rd (read: 10th) is exclusively about ecology, and the 2nd (read: 7th) is somewhat applicable but excludes aspects of the definition regarding physical space-- it makes sense to use that definition here (on tumblr), or on ...twitter? (Can I still call it twitter?) But an art gallery isn't (usually) a website, and is typically seen as serving its purpose in relationship to physical space as-well-as likeminded people. Anyway, the first definition of community is "A group of people living in the same place or having particular characteristics in common"(Oxford). You'll notice that this essentially applies to everything, in what world are we not engaging either with people in physical space or with people who have things in common? It kind of seems like the word community is, by this definition, too vague to be particularly useful in any regard-- especially in relationship to a business mission statement. So that was kind of a waste of time, unless, perhaps, I'm attempting to set up a point about intentionally vague language(?) Maybe you'll find out! Maybe! Anyway, since the dictionary definition was predictably useless, maybe the galleries I'm ostensibly talking about will offer something more substantial in their mission statements, artforum is a good place to go if you want big-name galleries to be advertised to you. Let's check out Marian Goodman Gallery's mission statement. For those not in the know, Marian Goodman Gallery is actually three galleries, one in LA, one in New York City (at the time of writing, the gallery is planned to move to Tribeca by 2024), and one à Paris. They're owned by Marian Goodman, who is a "Blue Chip" art dealer, which is actually a financial term and not an art term, but here basically means that she sells very expensive works of art and the work she sells can be trusted to be resold at a higher value than it was purchased at. In other word, the galleries she runs are incredibly well respected. Her mission statement (which actually doesn't make much sense given the financial aspect of her career but whatever) reads as follows:
"Marian Goodman Gallery champions the work of artists who stand among the most influential of our time, representing over five generations of diverse thought and practice. What makes the gallery singular is its enduring and deep-rooted collaborations and understanding with the artists—a bond that is concurrent with curators, thought leaders, and art institutions worldwide. The Gallery’s exhibition program, characterized by its caliber and rigor, provides international platforms for its artists to showcase their work, foster vital dialogues with new audiences, and advance their practices within nonprofit and institutional realms." (https://www.mariangoodman.com/about-our-gallery/).
I just finished washing my mouth out with soap, so now I'm ready to talk about this. Notably absent are the words "community" and "engagement" but that doesn't mean they aren't there! It just means we gotta dig around for, like two seconds, which we'll do but only after I make an extended point about how the first sentence is completely tautological. "Marian Goodman Champions the work of artists [...] the most influential of our time [...] over five generations." Okay, duh, of course they "champion" the work-- they're selling it, this is like saying that Apple champions the iPhone, or a used car dealer champions a 1997 GM Saturn. To state that these artists are "the most influential of our time" is true but in a weird kind of way-- the gallery represents 47 artists and among them are some very impressive figures, Chantel Akerman, William Kentridge, Christian Boltanski, Gerhard Richter (who actually ended his representation with them in 2022, in favor of the far more famous David Zwirner, which is an obvious and predictable career move, especially for an artist vocally interested in "winding down production"(artnet)). These are not artists to turn your nose up at, they're BIG names, they were also brought into being represented by the gallery well after they had already made a name for themselves. Akerman, for instance, had come into fame during the 70s and 80s as an experimental filmmaker-- the peak of her acclaim occurring in 1975, two years before Marian Goodman Gallery came into existence. I don't want to "throw" too much "shade" at Goodman, there is a certain kind of bravery to being born rich, then advertising already famous European artists to Americans who have never heard of them. But the artists were, without a doubt, already famous. Gerhard Richter, who is probably the most important artist ever to be represented by the gallery, had already been featured in the 1972, 1980, 1984 Venice Biennales as well as Documenta V (1972) and Documenta VII (1982) before he began his representation with Marian Goodman in 1985, these are incredibly prestigious art fairs and exhibitions, a baby could have predicted Richter's rise to international fame, especially considering it had already begun. None of this is to undermine MGG as an institution, it is absolutely noteworthy that this gallery was responsible for bringing prominent European artists to the States, but much of what it gives itself credit for within its about page, is actually the work of others, and is the reason that they began representing these artists in the first place. Finally the first sentence ends with "over five generations" which is just a way of saying "we've been around for a long time" and anyone knows what MGG is, already knows that, while it is impressive for an art gallery to be around for a long time, it certainly isn't retroactively impressive that a blue chip gallery is old-- thats kind of par-for-the-course. So now MGG and I are even, its website found a verbose and irritating way of telling its audience nothing while aggrandizing itself, and I've found a verbose and irritating way of telling you that thats what they're telling you while aggrandizing myself.
end of part one, in part two I'll finish what I was talking about in regards to MGG's definition of "community" and what it means for them to imply a kind of engagement. Maybe by the end of Part 3 i'll have made my point about exactly how much this is just meaningless puff, and perhaps another point about how it positions these galleries as somehow radical. I didn't know Tumblr had a character limit, otherwise I would've put this on substack. Too late to go back now.
1 note · View note
gregdotorg · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
There's a Dan Graham tribute show at Marian Goodman in NYC which is organized by his friend, fellow artist Peter Fischli. Among all the goodness is this architectural model for a daycare center pavilion from 1998. [photo @visitordesign]
0 notes
pikasus-artenews · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
D’ici à l’infini Giovanni Anselmo, Lothar Baumgarten, Marisa Merz, Ettore Spalletti Una mostra dedicata ad alcuni artisti legati direttamente o indirettamente al movimento artistico italiano dell’Arte Povera.
2 notes · View notes
las-microfisuras · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
Chantal Akerman, In the Mirror, 1971
16 mm black and white film transferred to digital format, 14 mins 21 secs. Marian Goodman Gallery.
125 notes · View notes
woundgallery · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
Francesca Woodman, Untitled, New York (NF.466), 1979-1980. Vintage color print. Image: 6 1/2x6 1/2in. (16,5x16,5cm). Paper: 10x8in. (25,4x20,3cm). Courtesy Marian Goodman Gallery/New York.
544 notes · View notes
garadinervi · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
Giovanni Anselmo (1934–2023)
Image: Giovanni Anselmo, La mia ombra verso l'infinito dalla cima dello Stromboli durante l'alba del 16 agosto, (color slide), 1965 [Marian Goodman Gallery, New York, NY. © Giovanni Anselmo. Photo: © Enrico Longo Doria]
(on the way of Peter Foolen)
16 notes · View notes
yama-bato · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
via
Tumblr media
Robby Müller | Polaroïds | Marian Goodman
Robby Müller
Kensington Motel, Santa Monica, Los Angeles, June-July, 1985
46 notes · View notes
abwwia · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
Nan Goldin, “The nap, Paris”, (2010). Chromogenic print. 24 × 64 1/2 in.; 61 × 163.8 cm
All works copyright © Nan Goldin. Courtesy of the artist and Marian Goodman Gallery
18 notes · View notes
paxesoterica · 9 months
Text
As obnoxious as Bandai are being about Suletta's and Miorine's marital status, there's some small consolement to me that at least they're too greedy and cowardly to go back and do a 4kids-style edit on the show (and will most likely wait until queer marriage in Japan is less 'controversial' and then promote the heck out of Witch from Mercury)...and then I had a terrible, terrible vision which I'm now compelled to afflict on all of you.
Tumblr media
"Sally Mercury is mostly your typical teenage girl - except for the fact that she grew up on the planet Mercury (the planet closest to the sun)! Sadly, she had no friends her age, and her only family was her mom, Patricia, a robot suit scientist, and a robot suit named Ariel, which Sally adopted as her 'older sister'.
Life was lonely for Sally, until one day her mom saved enough money to send Sally and Ariel to the Star Tree School of Science, where youngsters her age studied the business of robot suits...in space!
Sally is super-excited, with a whole list of things to do, and not even a rude meeting with the school's richest mean girl, Marian Rembrandt (descended from the famous Dutch painter), can upset her. But when she sees Marian getting bullied by one of the school's three princes, Gary Jeter, Sally knows she has to do the right thing, and sticks up for her. But somehow, this ends up in a robot suit laser tag match against Gary, which Sally easily wins - only to learn that she's now contracted to be business partners with Marian, and help her manage her family business when they graduate! Now Sally and Marian have to get to know each other, handle robot suit laser tag challenges from the other two princes, Alan Carrie and Shaun Sullivan, convince the school that Sally's not cheating at robot suit laser tag, *and* do all their schoolwork!
Even worse, unknown to both Sally and Marian, in the background their parents are secret rivals! Years ago, Sally's mom, Patricia, worked at the Van Buren Institute (named in honor of our 8th president) to fix a strange curse that was placed on Goodman robot suits, which would cause them to banish their pilots (and anyone nearby) into Dataspace. Marian's dad, Dale, only wanted to make Patricia look bad, but his actions caused an accident that trapped most of the Van Buren scientists in Dataspace! Left with only her daughter, Patricia has wanted to get even for years, and Sally's robot suit laser tag matches may finally give her the chance...
Will Sally be able to convince the three princes to stop being bullies? Will she be able to break the Goodman curse and not become trapped in Dataspace herself? Will she figure out how to be true business partners with Marian, despite their differences and their parents' rivalry? And, perhaps most importantly, will she have enough time to still make friends and graduate?! Tune in every Sunday at 5 pm to follow Sally, Marian, their friends, and their amazing adventures in 'Robot Suit Goodman: The Girl from Mercury'!"
50 notes · View notes