Horror Movie Review: Black Friday (2021)
Black Friday is a horror comedy starring Devon Sawa, Michael Jai White, and Bruce Campbell,
Black Friday is a horror comedy film that was written by Andy Greskoviak and directed by Casey Tebo. It stars Devon Sawa, Ivana Baquero, Ryan Lee, Stephen Peck, Michael Jai White, and Bruce Campbell, releasing in 2021.
Ahhh Black Friday, the time of year when big corporations entice us all with huge sales and discounts on items. When they knock those prices down to the same ones that they were 3…
View On WordPress
0 notes
The Accursed - Official Trailer
Dir: Kevin Lewis
Star: Sarah Grey / Sarah Dumont / Mena Suvari / Meg Foster
1 note
·
View note
Jeepers Creepers: Reborn Official Trailer
The fourth installment to the Jeepers Creepers franchise hits the reset button, taking the saga in a new direction with the first of a planned trilogy. It will be hitting theaters September 19th.
1 note
·
View note
am still obsessed with the bit from nope (2022) where em goes "so i was talking to my therapist about how dad made me feel unworthy and less than and--" and oj goes "you see a therapist??" and then em pauses and goes "i fuck one occasionally! anyways i was telling her--"
1K notes
·
View notes
[spoilers for nope (2022) ahead]
it’s been a couple days since we saw Nope and Oh My God I Cannot Stop Thinking About Jean Jacket. it’s a ufo. it’s an alien. it’s a force of nature. it’s an animal. a wild animal. a hungry, territorial, untameable predator. it’s a spectacle. an object of attention, obsession. an exploited show pony. a must-see event. with its gigantic screen-shaped eye it in itself IS a horror movie, a theater of billowing, constricting curtains and played back screams. it’s the viewed. it’s the Viewers. it’s the lens of the camera watching, capturing the image, of a black man on a horse. it’s an eye. it’s a mouth. it’s both, good god, it’s both. it ravenously consumes all who looks upon it and all it looks upon in return. it’s the perfect kind of movie monster that we as an audience are so horrified to look at, but the monster, in so many ways, is also us. it’s just us. we’re looking at a reflection, and it startles us, scares us. just like lucky at the beginning of the movie.
and it’s just fantastic.
1K notes
·
View notes
Gather is an intimate portrait of the growing movement amongst Native Americans to reclaim their spiritual, political and cultural identities through food sovereignty, while battling the trauma of centuries of genocide.
Gather follows Nephi Craig, a chef from the White Mountain Apache Nation (Arizona), opening an indigenous café as a nutritional recovery clinic; Elsie Dubray, a young scientist from the Cheyenne River Sioux Nation (South Dakota), conducting landmark studies on bison; and the Ancestral Guard, a group of environmental activists from the Yurok Nation (Northern California), trying to save the Klamath river.
Please share!!
208 notes
·
View notes
every so often I discover new things I'm unhappy with about the Sandman adaptation and each one is pettier than the last
what do you MEAN the word battle is between Dream and Lucifer? no it's NOT. it's between Dream and Choronzon who's acting on Beelzebub's behalf it's about the petty politics of Hell which is in large part what Lucifer finds so tiresome.
also why does Dream have human eyes give that bitch some contacts or Something
20 notes
·
View notes
I was reading your latest replies and I couldn’t help but wonder… thoughts on Saltburn? 💭 🛀
It was fun but tbh I think it was not perverse enough!!
Like I saw so many shocked reactions to it and went in expecting something that would give even *me* uncomfortable feelings. But watching it I felt like the production team was being conservative, like they were worried about being so shocking that it would be offensive and like- good art should lean into being potentially offensive. If you’re going to make your audience squirm don’t make them squirm just a little, make them viscerally recoil. If you’re going to do something that rides the line between horny and horrific, really lean hard into the horrific.
So I felt like some of the scenes that were shot in very low light to keep them ‘safe’ enough to keep the audience present (the ‘vampire’ scene) or where the details were obscured a little and make the audience put together what was going on (with the bathtub)- as a viewer I felt like in keeping things ‘safe’ they missed their true potential. I wanted to be horrified by them but honestly I’ve read much wilder stuff in published novels lol By playing it safe the movie avoided the most harsh criticism and outrage but also ensured it will never get taken seriously either.
And the end was kind of weak to me? Idk there felt like little purpose behind the things Oliver did even after he explained himself.
But overall!! Fun!! Like putting The Talented Mister Riley and early episodes of Skins into a blender and having some weirdo horny freak stuff come out. Absolutely worth the $10 in tickets, 10/10 movie to go to with a fellow fandom pervert.
7 notes
·
View notes
Terminal Dream (III) by Tim White-Sobieski. LED video tube wall installation, three channels, 2003.
22 notes
·
View notes
Bad Hombres, from Screen Media Chicken Soup for the Soul, brings to the screen an attention grabbing, electrifying, cartel drama as two illegals take a job only to find out their employer is burying dead bodies
3 notes
·
View notes
Ultra Q starting off strong by going 'hey what if we just pit these two kaiju against each other to solve our problems?'
5 notes
·
View notes
Hello there. This is me asking you to talk about the glass onion thing, I wanna know 😌
ok i just spent. an hour. writing a whole essay. and then accidentally deleted it. so!!!! i don't think i have the energy to rewrite the whole thing but the condensed version of the glass onion thoughts:
the movie itself was fun and i don't think there's anything wrong with enjoying it, but what bothers me is seeing so many responses praising the movie as though it was this groundbreaking anticapitalist critique when in reality the actual message of the movie was neither groundbreaking nor particularly anticapitalist and the movie itself is very much invested in capitalism; it's a film made by a multi-billion corporation whose primary purpose is to make rich people richer.
and i think a lot of this uncritically positive praise that treats the movie as though it's making some important political statement is falling into the trap of asking "does this media say something good or bad" rather than asking "is this media a lecture or a conversation." because sure, glass onion seems to be saying "eat the rich!", but that message is very carefully outlined in bite-sized chunks that are then spoonfed to the audience. like, it's very clear who's good and who's bad, and it's very clear why those people are good and bad, to the point that the viewer isn't really encouraged to question those assumptions and is supposed to just sit back and agree with the points the movie is making. and if more people were approaching media critique with the starting point of "is this a lecture or a conversation," i think fewer people would fall into this trap of just going "oh, this movie is saying something i agree with!" and instead pause and ask "why isn't this movie encouraging me to draw my own conclusions?" because in the case of glass onion, i think the answer to that question is that the movie is not really making any groundbreaking critique and is rather a perfect example of "anti-capitalist" capitalist media that works to keep people complacent by making them feel as though there's some important challenge being made when there's not.
20 notes
·
View notes
this is so dumb but i see a lot of tiktokers doing 'make-up throughout the decades' videos and they're cute but i do get confused because a lot of them are my age but don't seem to remember that contour for everyday use was not a thing before the mid-2010s. it was certainly not a thing in the 1940s those women were at war they were not concerned about highlighter.
7 notes
·
View notes
behold my full late 90s / early 2000s media set up Bitches. Fuck the shitty quality streaming of shows & movies you can never own & fuck compressed audio through shitty bluetooth speakers.
6 notes
·
View notes
tere are lots of mysteries where the audience knows ewho did it from the beginning. most columbo episodes worjk this way
so i have literally written whole paragraphs at this point about how:
a) discussions of genre will often use words in a very specific way, but not everyone will adhere to this usage.
b) genre itself is a fiddly thing - in my last post or two I've been discussing the formation and formalisation of the Detective Mystery in the 20th century as a format for written fiction.
It shouldn't be surprising if, over 50 years later, modern examples of/homages to the genre are innovating and drawing from other (sub)genres (in this case, imo, Noir).
You would expect that, but it doesn't change that (i) the archetypical Cosy Detective Story is something you can point to, that has a given structure, or that (ii) in discussion of Crime subgenres, 'Mystery' often specifically refers to stories that have a specific structure. I've outlined this usage in detail by now I think. It's a 'Mystery' because you are supposed to be trying to figure out the answer. In this context, it doesn't make sense to say "ah, but Columbo is a Mystery, and it doesn't have that format!" because what you are saying, tautologically, is that (that episode of) Columbo is not a Mystery.
Some people might describe Columbo as a "mystery" because (as I understand it; I don't watch it myself) it shares a lot of thematic ground with Detective Mystery/Murder Mystery/Cosy crime fiction. Sharing a lot of thematic ground with and appealing to fans of Cosy detective stories while not precisely replicating the Detective Mystery format in every single episode is a pretty common way to be for a crime procedural. My understanding via osmosis of Columbo suggests that 'crime procedural' is the correct classification of Columbo.
3 notes
·
View notes