Tumgik
#procecute
metal-cn · 8 months
Text
日本の、右派系政治団体、要職者a”100%、ロシアの勝利を信じますから”発言で離党との西側メディア情報、さらには日本の、近しい首相経験者bも雷同情報、、、これは今後の国際情勢に大きな影響を与えかねない。両本人の、露方”戦争犯罪””人道に対する罪”への加担さえ問われかねない!そこが、忖度者がひた隠すポイントだ!
The leadrng class of JPN Political world may be hypothetical to the resistance by Ukrine to USSR.They all look like act as if USSR wishes. This blog requests UN ICC to implement some effective measures aginst both and their around JPN News reporters. At least as for the their pal reporters, they shoud not be the safe ones under the international promised. just ”Defact” reporters. This blog requests at least himself to go to the nearest one UN place includes UN University of Aoyama, @Tokyo of JPN, to confess and admit his thin on the Ukrine topic to be gotten sued now.As to the ones around him, the same as him.
0 notes
revenuefacts · 1 year
Text
0 notes
box-dwelling · 10 months
Text
I think 1-3 and 2-4 are so so much funnier with the Edgeworth steel Samurai fanboy context. And just in general thinking about it from his perspective. Like, ok imagine you're a lawyer, a really good one. You've only ever lost one case and that one was kind of a fluke anyway because the actual murderer tried to claim the defense attorney did it when he obviously didn't, and also, a because this is tumblr and we need to get across the appropriate level of cringe, a superwholock fan. And you get called into work one day and find out that Andrew Scott was murdered and Benedict Cumberbatch did it and also you have to be the one to procecute the trial and the defense attorney is a childhood friend who is the only one to ever beat you in court and who you also are developing a gay little crush on. And then as the trial goes on it becomes more and more clear that Andrew Scott drugged and framed Benedict Cumberbatch for the attempted murder of Steven Moffatt because he accidentally killed someone on the set of doctor who 5 years ago and Moffatt had been extorting him. He did this by wearing the big stupid fucking trenchcoat. But it didn't work because Moffatt fought back and had Mark Gatiss cover it up. So the trial ends, with the truth coming out and you arrest Moffat and Gatiss meaning that Sherlock is officially cancelled but they're doing a few new similar series because it's popular.
A year goes by, your life goes to shit, you have a suicide attempt but then decide to just fake your death instead and go eat pray love across Europe. You'd become a lot closer with you crush before hand but you're pretty certain he's mad because of the whole death faking thing. Then you get a call and find out that Jarad Padalecki had murdered Jensen Ackles and your crush and sister are the procecution and defense. Now you are fucking certain Padalecki did it. But your crush is defending him when normally he only ever defends the innocent. So you decide to turn up and given him some advice about the fact hes defending the guilty party. He is very angry about you faking your death but eventuall tells you the only reason he's doing it is because his assistant, also a massive superwholock fan, has been fucking kidnapped and will be killed if he doesn't get a not guilty verdict. You promise to help in whatever way you can.
So the next day you turn up to the courthouse for moral support and then watch your sister get shot in the exact same building and the exact same place on her body that you found out last year you accidentally shot her father when you were 9 right before he killed your father. After a great deal of perstering you manage to persuade her to go to the hospital so now you're prosecuting another idol of yours I guess.
Please just live in this man's reality for a few minutes. Absolutely insane
291 notes · View notes
queer-ecopunk · 2 years
Note
Hey there, came across your blog yesterday and I really like your stuff!
I’m just curious, how do you keep yourself safe while dumpster diving, like accounting for coming into contact with biohazards and sharp objects?
Food waste really upsets me and I’m curious to try dumpster diving at grocery stores and what not, but I’m unsure of how to make sure I’m not trespassing, because the shopping centres in my area are heavily monitored with cameras!
Thanks for your time, keep doing what you do!
If you want to start diving, I would first look up any local laws for your area. Town laws will usually state what is legal and illegal, and you can go from there. If anyone ever stops or questions you, having this information is helpful.
For my area, diving is legal as long as I'm not A. Trespassing, B. Breaking open locks, or C. Illegally dumping (putting my own trash in). Trespassing is usually determined by if there are signs up that say "private property" or "no trespassing" or something similar. One place here also has a sign that says ~ "This trash is property of [store] and we will procecute people who take stuff" so I also avoid them. A lot of places have similar laws, so you may just have to look out for signs to be in the clear. I have dived where there are cameras with no problem, because they had no signs, the dumpsters were unlocked, and I wasn't dumping or leaving a huge mess.
Of course plenty of people dive illegally too, but this is up to everyone's own comfort. If going to a spot makes you feel concerned or unsafe, it probably isn't worth it. And even if you are legally in the clear, if someone asks/ tells you to leave, it is typically better to just go than to fight with them.
As for physical safety, I cannot reccomend enough to wear thick gloves, like gardening gloves. These can help protect against sharp objects and damp/gross stuff. Long sleeves are also helpful. Some people like to use one of those grabby arm things, not only to extend their reach but also to avoid touching some items directly. If you ever plan to get into a dumpster, make sure you are wearing sturdy, close-toed shoes and long socks/pants. Also be sure you can get back out before getting in, or bring a friend to help if you get stuck.
I've said it before on this blog, but use a flashlight if you are going at night. You don't want to accidentally drop your phone into a dumpster!
Otherwise, safety is very much based on being observant and using common sense. Don't stick your hands into a big unknown trash pile, instead move items methodically, touching what you can see is safe. Wash your hands after and try not to touch your face. Wipe down any objects and thoroughly wash any unwrapped food before eating. Use your own judgement for food items, particularly anything containing dairy or meat. And keep an eye on recalls, in case you find something that was thrown out for good reason.
I hope this answer was helpful and let me know if you have other questions. If you go diving, let me know how it went too! Good luck!
58 notes · View notes
milfbro · 4 months
Text
It's actually funny how the tension in anatomy of a fall is constructed, because the prosecution had NO case. There was no way she'd be found guilty and if she was the case would be destroyed in the first appeal. It's just a terrible case with zero evidence.
And the little kid has to remind the judge of the simple fact that reasonable doubt exists for her to be like "Oh wow. That's right. Silly me."
On the other hand the movie isn't about that it's about the kid and his relationship to his mom and his ableist fuck dead dad who sucks. So fine. But fr the procecution was like "btw she had an argument with him and she's bisexual. Case Closed." That's not how murder cases work bro
4 notes · View notes
alicedrawslesmis · 4 months
Text
has any french lawyer here watched Anatomy of a Fall and can list to me all the accuracies and inaccuracies of that courtroom. Because that was the most chaotic trial I've ever seen in anything. Can the defendant just interrupt an expert witness of the procecution and give her side of the story contradicting the expert??? and then can the expert just yell at her back unrestrained?????
do y'all not have objections. decorum. are trials all just open floor debates where some people wear like santa outfits
also I'm pretty sure if you're that hot in France they disqualify you from the bar exam
3 notes · View notes
vbartilucci · 8 months
Text
“The defendants are left to answer the question, were you lying then or are you lying now,” Wallace said.
Someone's a fan of Witness for the Procecution...
youtube
1 note · View note
itsthemysterykids · 2 years
Note
Judge: WHY WOULD YOU ADMIT- Oh my god- procecuters? Your witness?
Prosecutor: Know what? I think we’re done here. The Mystery Kids have already admitted to dozens of crimes we haven’t figured out, so… Let’s close the case on this.
Defense: Wait-!
Judge: Nope. I’m afraid it’s over. Has the jury reached a verdict?
Juror: Yes, your honor. We find the Mystery Kids guilty on all charges.
Mystery Kids: *Gasps*
Judge: Then, I have no choice. Coraline Jones, Wyborne Lovat, Norman Babcock, Neil Downe, Dipper Pines, Mabel Pines, Razputin Aquato, and Lili Zanotto, I sentence you to the maximum security juvenile detention facility until you are all eighteen, and then it is life in ADX Florence!
Dipper: Game over, guys!
Neil: No! No! It’s not happening!
Coraline: Any second now! Come on! Where’s the weird force that’ll get us out of this?!
Lili: FUCK!
*Just before the Judge can bang his gavel, the doors fly open, showing a lone silhouette*
Norman: What the…
5 notes · View notes
game8rm · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
procecute 起訴する
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
cahoot 共謀
Tumblr media
英語版、三列もあるのに更に文量がギチギチ英語にわかだから 自分がこれを英訳する時に to the court や poker のような日本語に無い説明まで把握して入れられるか、凄く心配
Tumblr media Tumblr media
私は英語の現在完了構文が今でも謎なのですが、ゲームをやっているとすごい頻度で現在完了が出てくる
でもたしかに証言は『経験』を語るものだから、頻出して当然なんだ
https://socaleikaiwa.com/grammar/have-been/
0 notes
walvitswordsandpoems · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
A change PROCECUTED for EXECUTED.
0 notes
Text
Every legal matter has its own theory of solving the case study and Federal Criminal Defense Lawyers are there to testify all the procecution advancements. They are meant to solve all your cases, therefore book an appointment from Casillas & Christian, PLLC.
Tumblr media
0 notes
tumbirus · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Good Evening, police investigation has revealed that the spurious liqure was supplied from Chokdi Village, a major hub of manufacturing and supply of countrymade liqure in the area.It was made by mixing water with methyl alchole methanol, a highly poisonous industrial solvent ,and sold to villagers for RS20 per pouch. The FIR lodged by police name bootleggers who were allegedly involved in supplying the hooch to the villages . However, villagers contended that there have been many more deaths than what's being counted in Gandhinagar. "There are a few people who died even before reaching any hospital. The real number would be very high ".The police swing into action with multiple FIRs lodged under the state prohibition law and various sections of the IPC. At least 38 persons have been booked ,out of which 15 have been arrested and charged with IPC sections such as 302 (murder),328 (causing hurt by means of poison )and section 67 (1a)of the Gujarth Prohibition Act for adulteration of alchole and preparing of hooch.The police ,however, have not involved 66 of the Prohibition Act in the FIRs, which covers consumption of liqure in the state ,ands that would have resulted in the victims being booked as well ,for consuming the alchole. Besides the arrests, the state government, in a bid to show decides action,suspended six police officials and transfferd two IPS officers ,the Superintendents of police of Ahmedabad (Rural) and Botad. "We are committed to prohibition and would never compromise on its implementation ",decleard Gujarth's junior Home Minister Harsh Sanghvi on last wenasday. He said the police will file a charge sheet in 10 days to ensure quick justice and the government will also appoint a special public procecuter to fight the case.The Ahmedabad Botad hooch tragedy is the worst in Gujarth in a decade. The last major hooch calamity was reported form Surat in 2016 when more than 20 migrant textiles workers... (at Mumbai, Maharashtra) https://www.instagram.com/p/CgzajKolbNi/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
0 notes
box-dwelling · 10 months
Text
I'm loving how AA4 has like a really solid film noir vibe, where everything is a lot seedier than the og trilogy. The setting, the clients, Ema having her dreams destroyed, Trucy being there trying to life everyone's spirits despite being deeply sad. Even stuff like Guy calling Trucy "Trucy Doll" just adds to the vibe, his talk about how there's darkness in the world, the narrative ties between him not being a surgeon and Phoenix not being a lawyer, it's great.
The vibe is solidly killed however by a Mr Klavier Gavin who is here to be hot and have a good time. Its a really funny parallel between this game and the trilogy with how in those games so much of the darkest themes came from the procecutors and phoenix was this beacon of hope. Now the Defense gets to be edgy so the procecution gets to be a bisexual rock star.
129 notes · View notes
Text
Stephen Miller and those who enabled him must be investigated and prosecuted
At the meeting, Miller accused anyone opposing zero tolerance of being a lawbreaker and un-American, according to the two officials present.
For those of you who haven’t seen it, “Conspiracy” is a 2001 BBC/HBO film addressing the infamous 1942 Wannsee Conference in which General Reinhard Heydrich, upon orders of Adolf Hitler, convened a group of fifteen high-ranking German officials to set forth the parameters of what became known as “The Final Solution,” the comprehensive and systematic plan to exterminate all Jews from the continent of Europe. Only one written record of the proceedings at Wannsee, a locality abutting a lakeside in Western Berlin, survived the war, and it is largely from this written summary (prepared from transcripts of the meeting by Adolf Eichmann) that the film is based.
The most chilling aspect of this film is the banal manner in which the subject is discussed, the euphemisms employed (“evacuation” rather than “extermination” being a typical example), the jocular mannerisms of several of the participants and in particular, their susceptibility to the intimidation of Heydrich as well as representatives of the Nazi SS present at the conference, held in a beautiful lakeside villa and catered with liveried servants.
The juxtaposition of fifteen men sitting around an oval-shaped conference table, alternately breaking for refreshments and wine, then returning to discuss the logistical necessities, facts and figures relating to the identification and classification of Jews, the proposed means of transport for their “evacuation” and ultimately the efficiencies of various means of murdering them, is beyond jarring—it’s fairly horrifying. The acting (Heydrich is played by Kenneth Branagh; Wilhelm Stuckart, the author of the Third Reich’s racial laws, is played by Colin Firth, and Adolf Eichmann by Stanley Tucci) is superior and riveting; you forget rather quickly that the entirety of the action revolves around a seemingly dry bureaucratic discussion around a conference table.
But probably the most unnerving thing, chills aside, about the film is the degree to which a group of people can come to a mutual accommodation towards evil, when that evil is presented and explicated as a means to an end that all of them desire.
In the Trump administration we are not, as far as is currently known, dealing with anything anywhere close to the realm of evil that occurred at Wannsee, but as the media fixate obsessively on the aftermath of the 2020 election and the continuing antics of Donald Trump and other Republicans denying the result of that election, certain things done, and certain actions taken by this administration in our name over the past four years, actions which likewise had their genesis in dry, bureaucratic conferences between highly placed American officials, should not be forgotten or allowed to “slip through the cracks.’ Because the evil that they represent—though not on the par with systematic genocide of the Nazis—should be no less unforgivable and intolerable.
In 2018, the current administration held a meeting, doubtlessly around an oblong conference table, in which it was calmly determined to forcibly and permanently separate children, many as young as babies, from their parents after those parents had been stopped following unlawfully crossing– or attempting to cross–over the border into the United States from Mexico.
As reported by NBC News:
WASHINGTON — In early May 2018, after weeks of phone calls and private meetings, 11 of the president’s most senior advisers were called to the White House Situation Room, where they were asked, by a show-of-hands vote, to decide the fate of thousands of migrant parents and their children, according to two officials who were there.
The meeting was held at the instigation of one of Donald Trump’s senior policy advisors, Stephen Miller, who was unquestionably operating to implement the specific policy aims of Donald Trump. Miller’s rabid xenophobia and anti-immigrant rhetoric had by that time (and has still) conferred upon him the unusual distinction of being one of the few members of Trump’s inner circle to have kept his position throughout Trump’s entire tenure.
As the NBC news report explains, the U.S. Justice Department under the orders of Jeff Sessions had already implemented Miller’s preferred “zero tolerance” policy towards prosecuting any undocumented immigrants captured crossing the U.S. border, a radical departure from decades of prior practice covering multiple U.S. administrations. Yet, as Julia Ainsley and Jacob Soboroff of NBC News reported, the forced separation between parents and their young children had not yet been put into place.  According to the report, Miller was “furious at the delay,” and had convened a meeting to emphasize his authority.
Those present at the meeting were Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar, and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen. According to NBC’s sources,  other participants may have included White House counsel Don McGahn, Deputy Chief of Staff Chris Liddell, and representatives of Vice President Pence’s office.
Nielsen, much like several of the participants at Wannsee nearly eighty years ago, had some issues she wanted to air out concerning the logistics. Specifically, she bemoaned the fact that DHS had insufficient resources to implement the separation process, in which children so taken from their parents would be removed to isolated separate facilities. Hers were practical objections, and she noted that the ability of her agency to ultimately return these essentially kidnapped children to their parents was in doubt. She warned that the process could “get messy,” and could end up in children getting “lost” in a system of holding pens, without any recourse.
These complaints did not find a willing audience in Miller, who not only did not perceive any inherent moral issues with separating children from their parents, but in fact wanted to accelerate and expand the process, so that such separated children would ultimately number in the tens of thousands.
The NBC report gives no doubt as to who was in charge of driving the policy:
At the meeting, Miller accused anyone opposing zero tolerance of being a lawbreaker and un-American, according to the two officials present.
“If we don’t enforce this, it is the end of our country as we know it,” Miller said, according to the two officials. It was not unusual for Miller to make claims like that, but this time he was adamant that the policy move forward, regardless of arguments about resources and logistics.
Around the same time, the Justice Department was given a similar mandate by Attorney General Sessions, one which was echoed and embellished by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein. As reported in October, 2020, by the New York Times:
“We need to take away children,” Mr. Sessions told the prosecutors, according to participants’ notes. One added in shorthand: “If care about kids, don’t bring them in. Won’t give amnesty to people with kids.”
Rod J. Rosenstein, then the deputy attorney general, went even further in a second call about a week later, telling the five prosecutors that it did not matter how young the children were. He said that government lawyers should not have refused to prosecute two cases simply because the children were barely more than infants.
Back at the Cabinet meeting, a frustrated and angry Miller accused Nielsen of “stalling” and demanded that all present demonstrate their loyalty to the policy by a show of hands. Incidentally, the participants at Wannsee were also required to voice their assent for “the policy,” which they dutifully affirmed with varying degrees of enthusiasm (this is one of the more gut-churning events in the film).
With the exception of Nielsen, who still clung to her logistical objections, all hands went up.
Spokesmen for both the White House and the Department of Health and Human Services have denied this “vote” actually occurred. NBC stands by its story. DHS and the State Department have referred all inquiries about the meeting to the White House, and the key Cabinet officials involved, Nielsen and Sessions have refused comment.
In other words, they can’t or won’t confirm one simple point—was there, in fact, such a vote?
Thus did our lawfully elected government enter on a course that at this count, has left over 600 children permanently separated from their parents, trapped in holding cells at locations scattered throughout the United States.
As reported by the NBC, that number is even higher than Trump administration officials previously acknowledged.
Lawyers working to reunite migrant families separated by the Trump administration before and during its “zero tolerance” policy at the border now believe the number of separated children for whom they have not been able to find parents is 666, higher than they told a federal judge last month, according to an email obtained by NBC News.
Nearly 20 percent, or 129, of those children were under 5 at the time of the separation, according to a source familiar with the data.
The issue of immigration has been the touchstone of this administration’s domestic policy since the days of the 2016 campaign. It has been used as both a weapon, an excuse and a bludgeon against Trump’s political opponents. The evidence clearly indicates that the policy of forcibly separating children from their parents was instituted and ordered by persons at the highest levels of this administration. They are therefore—in theory at the very least—amenable to prosecution, possibly for crimes against humanity.
At the very minimum, immediately upon the inauguration of Joseph Biden as President, the Congress should instigate hearings and the Justice Department should initiate an investigation for potential prosecution and criminal or civil liability of those responsible for this inhumane and abhorrent policy decision and its implementation.
Thank you to all who already support our work since we could not exist without your generosity. If you have not already, please consider supporting us on Patreon to ensure we can continue bringing you the best of independent journalism.
Article Source
1 note · View note
Text
Makes Me Sick
Ahmaud Arbery. Breonna Taylor. Bothem Jean. George Floyd. And 694 other African-American people killed by police officers since 2017. That’s 698 more people than deserved to die. 698 more people that should be here still, spending more time with the people who loved them. It makes me sick. 
It makes me sick that Ahmaud Arbery was just going for a jog, something I do every. single. morning, when he was shot by two white supremacists who thought that he was trespassing. Even if he had been, trespassing is a misdemeanor and CANNOT warrant a death sentence. 
It makes me sick that Breonna Taylor and Bothem Jean were murdered in their OWN homes. Breonna’s door was kicked in by police officers who had a warrant to search a nearby house and ended up in hers. Even if it hadn’t been her house, she could’ve been there for any number of reasons but they killed her before she could say anything. Bothem Jean was killed in his Dallas apartment by an off-duty cop who thought it was her house. She walked in and shot him, didn’t say anything first, just pulled out her firearm and killed a man in cold blood. On top of that, she hesitated to call the paramedics and didn’t administer ANY life-saving procedures. 
It makes me sick that George Floyd was buying groceries when someone called the police because they ASSUMED he was using counterfeit money. When the police arrived they threw him to the ground while one of them put his knee on George’s neck, not a procedure taught at the academy to restrain someone. The other officers stood their and watched as George shouted that he couldn’t breath and that he thought he was dying, at one point he even called for his mother.
Now there are hundreds of mothers and fathers who buried their children, when in fact, it should have been the other way around. There are mothers and fathers left childless because an officer thought that they had the right to rob families of thier members. There are kids standing at their siblings funeral unable to comprehend the fact that they are NEVER going to see their brother or sister again. And their are ideas which will never be spoken into life because the lungs they should’ve came from aren’t breathing anymore.  
6 notes · View notes
uphindia-world · 5 years
Text
Pak must prosecute top LeT operatives along with its leader Hafiz Saeed: US
Pak must prosecute top LeT operatives along with its leader Hafiz Saeed: US
Washington: Pakistan must prevent militant groups from operating on its soil and prosecute top Lashkar-e-Taiba operatives along with its leader Hafiz Saeed, the US has said ahead of the Financial Action Task Force’s crucial decision on whether to blacklist the country.
Tumblr media
Alice Wells, head of the US state department’s South and Central Asian bureau, also welcomed the arrest the top four leaders…
View On WordPress
0 notes