To the last Ukrainian today, to the last Taiwanese tomorrow,to the last European soon after,they see their lackey as nothing but fodder to put between the us and its enemies
The post is machine translated
Translation is at the bottom
The collective is on telegram
⚠️ GLI STATI UNITI E I LORO LECCAPIEDI CONSIDERANO LE PERSONE DELL'ISOLA DI TAIWAN COME "CARNE DA MACELLO" ⚠️
🇨🇳 Un'altra brillante vignetta della Compagna Liu Rui, Fumettista del "环球时报", tabloid di proprietà del Partito Comunista Cinese, intitolata "Un amico fatale", che mostra lo Zio Sam spingere barili esplosivi e dinamite sull'Isola di Taiwan, esclamando «Un regalo per il nostro "amico"» 💣
🇺🇸 Gli USA, servendosi della piattaforma separatista, vendipatria e ricolma di molestatori sessuali che è il DPP, stanno preparando il terreno per un gigantesco conflitto con la Cina 😡
🐲 Questo è sotto gli occhi di tutti, soprattutto delle persone a Taiwan. Come ha dichiarato Yok Mu-ming - Presidente del 新黨, il "Nuovo Partito Cinese" di Taiwan, dal 2003 al 2020, le persone dell'Isola saranno le principali vittime di un conflitto, qualora gli USA dovessero trasformare la regione in un campo di battaglia per una "guerra per procura" contro la Repubblica Popolare Cinese 😡
🤧 Il fatto che una Guerra per la Riunificazione Cinese possa trasformarsi in una guerra mondiale non dipende dalla Cina, ma dalle azioni degli USA e dei loro lacchè europei e giapponesi 👍
🇨🇳 Gli USA e i loro vassalli non dovrebbero mai pensare di poter esercitare una violenta coercizione sulla Questione di Taiwan. Questo è un avvertimento anche per l'Italia 🇮🇹
🌸 Iscriviti 👉 @collettivoshaoshan
⚠️ THE UNITED STATES AND THEIR LUCKS CONSIDER THE PEOPLE OF TAIWAN IS "BELLFOOD" ⚠️
🇨🇳 Another brilliant cartoon by Comrade Liu Rui, Cartoonist of the "环球时报" tabloid owned by the Communist Party of China, titled "Fatal Friend", showing Uncle Sam pushing explosive barrels and dynamite on Taiwan Island, exclaiming «A gift for our "friend"» 💣
🇺🇸 The USA, using the separatist, traitorous, and full of sex offenders platform that is the DPP, is preparing the ground for a gigantic conflict with China 😡
🐲 This is there for all to see, especially the people in Taiwan. As Yok Mu-ming - Chairman of 新黨, the "New China Party" of Taiwan, stated from 2003 to 2020, the people of the island will be the main victims of a conflict, if the US turns the region into a camp battle for a "proxy war" against the People's Republic of China 😡
🤧 Whether a War for Chinese Reunification can turn into a world war does not depend on China, but on the actions of the USA and its European and Japanese lackeys 👍
🇨🇳 The USA and its vassals should never think that they can exercise violent coercion on the Taiwan question. This is also a warning for Italy 🇮🇹
🌸 Subscribe 👉 @collettivoshaoshan
12 notes
·
View notes
Biden says his Taiwan comments don't reflect a change in U.S. policy after drawing ire from China
Biden says his Taiwan comments don’t reflect a change in U.S. policy after drawing ire from China
U.S. President Joe Biden speaks during a joint news conference with Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida after their bilateral meeting at Akasaka Palace in Tokyo, Japan, May 23, 2022.
Jonathan Ernst | Reuters
President Joe Biden insisted Tuesday that the U.S. hasn’t changed its strategic policy on Taiwan, a day after he angered Beijing when he said his administration would be willing to use…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Accuse your enemy of what you are guilty, a nazi propaganda tactics that the Americans live by
The post is machine translated
Translation is at the bottom
The collective is on telegram
⚠️ NEL MENTRE GLI IMPERIALISTI STATUNITENSI ACCUSANO LA CINA DI "SPIONAGGIO" SENZA ALCUNA PROVA, UN ALTRO RC-135V VIENE INVIATO NELLO STRETTO DI TAIWN ⚠️
🇺🇸 Nel mentre gli imperialisti statunitensi continuano a diffamare la Cina e Cuba con notizie fasulle sul tema dello "spionaggio", un altro RC-135V ha effettuato un volo nello Stretto di Taiwan, probabilmente - come riferisce China Army - per osservare il movimento del Gruppo d'Attacco della Portaerei Shandong, che ha effettuato un'esercitazione militare nella Baia di Bohai 🌟
🔍 Provocazioni degli USA contro la Cina nel 2023:
一 24/02: il Comando Orientale dell'EPL intercetta un P-8A nel Mar Cinese Meridionale, e invia un Caccia di Superiorità Aerea J-11, armato con Missili Aria-Aria, per scortare l'Aereo USA al di fuori della Zona Cinese 🔥
二 23/03: gli USA inviano il Cacciatorpediniere Milius nel Mar Cinese Meridionale, nell'Area delle Isole Paracel, al fine di provocare la Cina😡
三 28/04: gli USA inviano un P-8A nello Stretto di Taiwan, per provocare la Pace nella Zona 😏
四 26/05: Il Comando dell'EPL intercetta un RC-135V nel Mar Cinese Meridionale, pericolosamente vicino alla Città di Shantou, e invia un Caccia Multiruolo J-16 per scortarlo fuori dalla Zona Cinese 🔥
五 07/06: gli USA inviano un RC-135U per spiare la Cina, operando all'incontro tra lo Stretto di Taiwan e il Mar Cinese Meridionale 😡
🐰 Queste sono notizie certe, DOCUMENTATE, non le menzogne senza fonti, tipiche del disgustoso sistema USA «Lancia accuse senza fornire le prove» sul Tema di Cuba. Le tigri di carta americane devono costruire artificialmente ogni sciocchezza anti-Cinese sullo «spionaggio a Cuba» per giustificare ulteriori operazioni aggressive nei confronti della Cina 🤮
🇨🇳 丢掉幻想,准备斗争 ⭐️
🌸 Iscriviti 👉 @collettivoshaoshan
⚠️ AS US IMPERIALISTS ACCUSE CHINA OF "SPYING" WITHOUT ANY EVIDENCE, ANOTHER RC-135V IS SENT INTO THE TAIWN STRAIT ⚠️
🇺🇸 While the US imperialists continue to smear China and Cuba with fake news on the subject of "espionage", another RC-135V flew into the Taiwan Strait, probably - as China Army reports - to observe the movement of the Carrier Strike Group Shandong, which conducted a military exercise in Bohai Bay 🌟
🔍 US provocations against China in 2023:
一 24/02: PLA Eastern Command intercepts a P-8A in the South China Sea, and sends a J-11 Air Superiority Fighter, armed with Air-to-Air Missiles, to escort US aircraft out of the Chinese zone 🔥
二 23/03: US sends Destroyer Milius to South China Sea, Paracel Islands Area, in order to provoke China😡
三 28/04: US sends a P-8A into the Taiwan Strait to cause peace in the area
四 26/05: The PLA Command intercepts an RC-135V in the South China Sea, perilously close to Shantou City, and sends a J-16 Multirole Fighter to escort it out of the Chinese Zone 🔥
五 07/06: US sends RC-135U to spy on China, operating at the junction of the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea 😡
🐰 This is certain, DOCUMENTED news, not the unsourced lies typical of the disgusting US system «Launch accusations without providing evidence» on the Cuba issue. American paper tigers must artificially construct any anti-Chinese nonsense about «espionage in Cuba » to justify further aggressive operations against China 🤮
🇨🇳 丢掉幻想,准备斗争 ⭐️
🌸 Subscribe 👉 @collettivoshaoshan
2 notes
·
View notes
The Biden administration signaled on December 12 that it is willing to make disastrous—and permanent—changes to asylum and immigration policy to obtain temporary military aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.
Top White House officials reportedly met with some of the key Senate negotiators, Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT), and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (I-AZ), as well as Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. Unfortunately, media reports indicate the White House is willing to resurrect some Trump-era anti-immigrant policies to cut a deal on Ukraine funding. These include the nationwide expansion of a fast-track deportation process known as “expedited removal,” the expansion of mandatory detention, and the immediate expulsion of migrants at the border under a Title 42-like authority.
...
The implementation of Title 42-like authority at the border would be counterproductive at addressing migration and, instead, will result in many individuals being sent back to persecution in their home countries or forced to wait in Mexico indefinitely. Human rights organizations have tracked thousands of incidents of violence against migrants, including murder, rape, and torture, during the Biden administration’s implementation of Title 42.
Reimposing Title 42 would also fail to seriously address border crossings. Analysis from the American Immigration Council shows that these expulsions do not deter migrants from attempting to cross the U.S.-Mexico border. During the Title 42 policy, roughly one in three people apprehended after crossing the border were on their second or higher failed attempt to cross. This is confirmed by a recent analysis of DHS data from the Cato Institute, which revealed that ending Title 42 significantly reduced repeat crossings and halved so-called “gotaways.” As a result, allowing any DHS secretary to simply shut the border to asylum seekers would lead to tremendous harm to both asylum seekers and to basic principles of border management.
Dramatically expanding mandatory immigrant detention
The White House has also reportedly agreed in principle to language that would strip authority from DHS to release migrants who cross the border and are taken into custody. While many of those individuals are currently eligible for release, language currently in H.R. 2, a Republican-supported bill that passed along party lines in the House earlier this year, would bar DHS from releasing any migrant—regardless of whether they are families or children.
The expansion of detention raises serious human rights concerns and would represent a complete break from the promises President Biden made as a candidate and while in office. Within the confines of the already expansive immigrant detention landscape, there are numerous complaints of negligent medical care, unsafe conditions, unfair and discriminatory treatment of detained migrants, and excessive use of force. Barring the release of migrants seeking protection to deter migration would only increase these abuses.
In addition, the United States simply does not have, and has never had, sufficient detention capacity to detain all migrants crossing the border, so releases would have to continue anyway. But by barring DHS from releasing migrants, Congress would also likely force the administration to restart family detention centers, leading to children suffer in detention centers for months or longer
Heightening the Standard for an Initial Asylum Screening
Negotiators are contemplating heightening the standard used for initial asylum screenings at the border. Currently, migrants must show that there is a “significant possibility” that they are eligible for asylum or similar protections, including under the Convention Against Torture. The standard was established in 1996 as a safeguard to prevent the U.S. government from breaking its international humanitarian agreements by erroneously deporting someone back to danger. If the migrant fails to show a significant possibility, they can be swiftly deported through the expedited removal process.
As we’ve seen under the Biden administration, making the standard more difficult will have not have a significant impact on newly arriving migrants. Since May, the Biden administration has been implementing a heightened standard in this initial screening process under its Circumvention of Lawful Pathways rule. Despite this, border apprehensions have risen significantly since this rule went into effect, which suggests that it has not been a deterrent.
Migrants often don’t know the nuances of immigration policy and arrive at our border simply hoping to find safety. This means that raising the standard will only result in the deportation of migrants who may have viable asylum claims but can’t immediately prove their case to an asylum officer at the border.
Third Country Transit Asylum Ban
Though the specifics are not yet known, an asylum ban for people who travel through a third country before arriving to the United States can have devasting consequences for U.S. foreign policy and for immigrants arriving in this country on visas. For example, under a bill passed along party-lines in June, an untold number of individuals could lose access to asylum for simply having an international layover on a flight to the United States. This means that even an Afghan national evacuated from Kabul via a U.S. military base in Germany could not apply for asylum for failing to apply in Germany first. A Ukrainian national whose flight stopped in London before arriving to the United States would be similarly barred.
Such a proposal ignores that many people may pass through a country where applying for asylum is impracticable or which is not safe for them, and they would be barred from asylum as a result. In addition, this proposal will not have any impact on reducing migration. Under the Biden administration’s asylum restriction, roughly 90% of migrants who cross the border between ports of entry are already banned from seeking asylum. Imposing a statutory transit ban would most heavily impact individuals who enter legally through ports of entry or who fly into the country on visas.
Expansion of Fast-Track Deportations Nationwide
On December 8, news broke that the White House would be willing to support a nationwide expansion of “expedited removal,” a fast-tracked deportation process.
Currently, expedited removal is applied to noncitizens who present themselves at a port of entry without proper entry documents, or who enter without permission within the last 14 days and are apprehended within 100 miles of the border. This process severely limits due process by allowing low-level immigration officials (not judges) to immediately order deportations without the right to an attorney.
A nationwide expansion, like previously occurred under the Trump administration, could mean that immigrant parents, children, and spouses of U.S. citizens living in the United States for years could be swept up for swift removal with little legal recourse. Due to the expedited nature of this process, migrants with pending applications for relief could be removed and Black, Brown, and Indigenous communities could be unfairly targeted. This would also require significantly more resources for immigration enforcement, as interior enforcement of expected removal would involve significant operational complexities.
Crucially, expanding expedited removal to the interior would not reduce border crossings, as the policy is already in effect at the border. It would, however, provide a powerful tool for a future administration that aimed to carry out mass deportations of recently arrived migrants.
What’s Next?
It’s still unclear whether any of these concessions can make it through both chambers of Congress. The House GOP has indicated that they want significantly broader changes to asylum and border policy, and hardline GOP senators have reportedly said that even these policies are “not nearly enough.” With the clock ticking on holiday recess, the chance that Congress can hammer out a deal and make it law by the end of December is increasingly slim.
However, in the past few days, the Senate negotiations have moved us closer to potentially seeing these Trump-era like policies becoming law. We need real policy solutions that don’t throw the immigrant community under the bus
3 notes
·
View notes