how to become more autism
make sure to keep up to date with your covid booster
153 notes
·
View notes
Hot take: If you are anti-vaccination then you are pro child death.
Children have died of measles and mumps who should still be alive, all because of the Lancet MMR autism fraud and Andrew Wakefield. The MMR vaccines literally save lives.
If you are anti-vaccination then you are pro child death.
16 notes
·
View notes
The "autism is caused by vaccines thing" is so funny to me, because, people automatically assume I am against it because I don't want it to be true.
It's like. Karen. No one wants to sue Johnson and Johnson and be taken care of for the rest of their life more than me. That's literally a dream scenario. If it were true, I would be first in line for my "you are entitled to financial compensation" package.
3 notes
·
View notes
“For the bazillionth time, vaccines do not cause autism—and dog autism is not a thing.”
Oh, ffs
0 notes
It feels dangerous to write about Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: In the lag between when I put the finishing touches on this and when it becomes publicly available, I could be a conspiracy theory or two behind.
I could be mulling his apparent belief that the coronavirus was diabolically engineered to spare Chinese and Ashkenazi Jewish people while he has already moved on to the hypothesis that Ron DeSantis is a hologram gone haywire (I could buy into this one), the revelation that earbuds deliver subconsciously perceptible government propaganda through our auditory canals or the epiphany that French bulldogs cause global warming. He’s a crank who cranks out whoppers the way Taylor Swift disgorges perfect pop songs.
But we hang on her words for her craft. We hang on his for his clan. Kennedy is where paranoia meets legacy admissions. Like Donald Trump, with whom he has much more in common than he probably cares to admit, he’s an elitist hawking anti-elitism, an insider somehow branding himself an outsider, a scion styled as a spoiler, a populist as paradox. Why do Americans keep falling for these arrogant oxymorons?
Frank Bruni at the New York Times writing about Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who has devolved into a firehose of conspiracy theories.
Years ago RFK Jr. was known as a respected environmentalist. Then at some point he started spouting the unsupported conspiracy theory about vaccines causing autism. He's gotten increasingly unhinged ever since.
Though I do have to give him credit for creativity; that one about Ron DeSantis being a malfunctioning hologram sounds quite original. Do holograms eat pudding with their fingers and wear big white boots while robotically shouting "WOKE! WOKE! WOKE!"? 😝
1 note
·
View note
My family member told me (again) that vaccines cause infertility.
I asked him how many doses do I need to take for it to actually work.
He wasn't amused.
1 note
·
View note
Lmfao My parents just got here, and I had the book I've been reading sitting by me while I was on my computer, and my mom wandered over and asked, "What's 'The Panic Virus'" and I responded with, "Oh, it's about the guy who did the study on the link between autism and vaccines--the very shit study, and how the media was complicit by giving him a platform and presenting the topic without any nuance and how that resulted in the ensuing hysteria surrounding the vaccines' and she just walked away without saying a word.
13 notes
·
View notes
terfs when a study shows literally anything positive about trans people/transitioning: 'hm i think this requires some fact-checking. Were those researchers REALLY unbiased? Because if they were biased this doesn't count and if they weren't knowingly biased they probably were unconsciously biased, woke media affects so much these days. Have there been any other studies on this? Because if there haven't been this could be an outlier and if there have been and they all agree that's a bit odd, why aren't there any outliers, and if there have been and any disagree we really won't know the truth until we very thoroughly analyze them all, will we? Were there enough subjects for a good sample size? Did every single subject involved stay involved through the whole study because if they didn't we should be sure nothing shady was going on resulting in people dropping out. Are we 110% sure all the subjects were fully honest and at no point were embarrassed or afraid to admit they didn't love transitioning to the people in charge of their transition? Are we 110% sure none of the subjects were manipulated into thinking they were happy with their transition? In fact we should double-check what they think with their parents, because if the subjects and their parents disagree it's probably because they've been manipulated but their cis parents have not and are very unbiased. How many autistic subjects were there because if there weren't enough then this doesn't really study the overlap between autistic and trans and if there were too many then we just don't know enough about what causes that overlap to be sure this study really explains being trans and isn't just about being autistic. How many AFAB subjects were there because if there weren't enough this is just another example of prioritizing AMAB people and ignoring the different struggles of girls and women and if there were too many how do we know sexism didn't affect the results. Was the study double-blinded? We all know double-blinded is the most reliable so if this one wasn't that's a point against it even if the thesis literally physically could not be double-blinded. Look i'm not being transphobic, i want what's best for trans people! Really! But as a person who is not trans and therefore objective in a way they cannot possibly be, i just think we should only take into account Good Science here. You want to be following science and not being manipulated or experimented upon by something unscientific, right?'
terfs when they see a study of 45 subjects so old it predates modern criteria for gender dysphoria and basically uses 'idk her parents think she's too butch', run by a guy who practiced conversion therapy, 'confirmed' by a guy who treated the significant portion of subjects who didn't follow up as all desisting, definitely in the category of 'physically cannot double-blind this', completely contradicted by multiple other studies done on actual transgender subjects, but can be kinda cited as evidence against transitioning if you ignore everything else about it: 'oOOH SEE THIS IS WHAT WE'RE TALKIN BOUT. SCIENCE. Just good ol' unbiased thorough analysis. I see absolutely no reason to dig any deeper on this and if you think it's wrong you're the one being unscientific. It's really a shame you've been so thoroughly brainwashed by the trans agenda and can't even accept science when you see it. Maybe now that someone has finally uncovered this long-lost study from 1985, we can make some actual progress on the whole trans problem.'
5 notes
·
View notes
the sheer quantity of transphobes i have argued with in my life has clearly painted out to me a transphobia continuum ranging from i must be patrick star because i live under a fucking rock to not transphobic.
like i may or may not be currently arguing with some boomer under a soft white underbelly interview of a homeless trans woman who's arguing that being trans is a mental illness yet has refused over 10 times to provide any kind of proof whatsoever. the liberal urge to feed "facts don't care about your feelings" right back into this guy's mouth.
there are some transphobes out there who have heard about gender dysphoria before, though they will use that to say trans people are mentally ill. but at least they're not completely in the dark about what being trans means. like not to give transphobes any credit but they do fall on a spectrum of ignorance.
4 notes
·
View notes
Story at a glance:
Data suggest that 1 in 30, or 3.49%, of children ages 3 to 17 were diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in 2020.
The rate of autism in lower-income families is higher than in higher-income families, and lower-income families tend to have higher vaccination rates than higher-income families.
In 2010, the federal vaccine court conceded that Hannah Poling’s autism was the result of vaccinations, which “significantly aggravated an underlying mitochondrial disorder.”
Exposure to glyphosate, mercury, lead, aluminum and other chemicals, including phthalates and air pollution, is also implicated in autism.
Even acetaminophen, brand name Tylenol, used during pregnancy increases the risk of autism in children.
Rates of autism continue to increase in the U.S., with the latest estimates showing that 1 in 30, or 3.49%, of children ages 3 to 17 were diagnosed with ASD in 2020.
The data, gathered in 2019 and 2020, came from the U.S. National Health Interview Survey, and revealed that out of 12,554 children surveyed in 2019 and 2020, 410 were diagnosed with autism.
The overall prevalence of autism in 2019 was 2.79%, increasing to 3.49% in 2020, which represents a 53% increase since 2017.
The study also revealed that autism prevalence increased from 2014 to 2016, decreased from 2016 to 2017, and then increased from 2017 to 2020. The stark rise in autism rates in the U.S. is difficult to ignore, but what’s driving the increase remains a mystery.
3 notes
·
View notes