There is such a thing as writing a post about what you like in a piece of media even if that thing is done imperfectly. You do not have to bow to the moral purity gods for your tribute every time you want to talk about that thing. You do not have to tack on that criticism to every post you see to Make People Aware of the Problem. You do not need to and probably should not make every media post about your activism. You are allowed to expect and give benefit of the doubt that sometimes people want to talk positives and are smart enough to already know the negatives. We do not need to live our lives in such honor and fear of the negatives that they are required dark tribute in every sentence you write and say. Being discerning doesn't just mean we can identify pros and cons, it means we don't get so tangled up in an imperfection we can't appropriately handle it.
171 notes
·
View notes
A lot of people are completely disinterested in creating a safe space for all aros and aces because that would require letting go of being allowed to publicly shame things like sex and romance. There is a stark difference between repulsion/aversion and negativity, and that line stands where you treat those things as disgusting or as a personal fault/flaw. While I'm romance repulsed, I'm never going to go on my blog and call romance disgusting or gross, because it isn't; it's a feeling, neutral in morality, and a way to live your life if you so choose.
I don't think a lot of people get this or what the difference is. Anybody can be negative and anyone can have harmful ideas, favourable or repulsed. It's about how you treat it, how you express about it, and if you seek to demonise or make those things out to be disgusting, perverse, or deviant.
Even small things or "jokes" add up over time; put yourself in the shoes of someone who has to see those "jokes" made about their lifestyle and what's important to them every day, or even every hour. Would you still feel like they're lighthearted after even one day of reading over and over again?
[Not to say anyone who's done this in the past is a horrible, terrible person. You can change and grow as you take in info; that's just the life experience. But, to grow, you need to actively want to, and that means addressing biases and asking yourself "should I say this? Could this affect my peers?"]
105 notes
·
View notes
I don't rlly trust those ppl who wholeheartedly believe that cats r better than dogs or you can trust cat people more because "cats have boundaries and you know who will respect boundaries if they like cats" because that just proves to me you Don't respect dogs boundaries lol
28 notes
·
View notes
do you think barbara and ian ever got in hot water with unit for just straight up selling the story of their adventures with the doctor to hollywood or…
23 notes
·
View notes
I was just thinking again of Idolish7 and I think that the reason that the theme of legacy and carrying on the baton or becoming something better was done SO well was because it they approached it from that old adage about "paying it forward." It's like....yes, they are rivals and competing and doing this for themselves, but like Otoharu said in one of the story parts, the past isn't worthless because it gives us something to build off of and perhaps surpass (and it's good inspiration, too). And you can see that in addition to just being idols and creating music and making their own kinds of art for themselves, they're also doing this out of love for something from the past. Mitsuki with Zero, Sogo with his uncle, Tamaki for Aya, Iori for his brother, Riku because of his family and Tenn, Tenn for his family/Kujo, Momo and Yuki for the old Re:vale and Banri, Minami and Nagi for Sakura, also even Aya for the families that abandoned her and the new ones that gave her something, etc. Even people like Torao and Yamato, who kind of entered the industry purely out of "selfish" desires have an arc where they received kindness and now just want to pass it on.
To sum it up, by treating the past with respect and real appreciation, they can surpass it without trying to undermine its real impact and beauty.
16 notes
·
View notes
Tp Link and Zelda whenever they’re around each other: *acts cold to each other, throws petty insults, actively avoids each other*
Tp Link and Zelda when someone else insults them: *will absolutely defend each other with their lives*
34 notes
·
View notes
On a serious note, I do feel mysterious case lotusbook has a lot of sincere themes about getting older, realities of responsibility and dreams realized, how it's difficult to succeed and not always the direct path one expects, how there's value in little aspects of life. Almost every li lianhua scene seems to be about that to some degree. The murder cases aren't particularly deep as far as super complicated to figure out or Able to be predicted super well (since they don't always give all the details in the initial setup), but the themes about who was killed and why do connect to li lianhuas situation.
45 notes
·
View notes
i love. i love your dios hairstyle? i have never ever seen someone draw his hair that way. this is so nuanced. your dio is so nuanced. you could be a licenced professor in jjba phantom blood university
you flatter me too much... I haven't even begun posting my essays or comics yet! I am very taken with his jojonium hairstyle because... well I think it's very cute. but also in part because of this part from Our Deportment by John Young (1882):
his physiognomy remains intact but the rest is true. of upmost importance to me that the way he dresses and appears in public is relatively abrasive to the societal norms of the time but he has a vision and you philistines would never understand
65 notes
·
View notes
someone posted a picture of a map and captioned it: The oldest Ptolemy map of Palestine is dated 150 AD. The large red letters in the center say in Greek: Παλαιστινης or Palaistinis.
Map in question:
What's accurate: all of it. This is a Byzantine Greek copy of Ptolemy's 4th Asia map from the Codex Vaticanus Urbinas Graecus 82, Constantinople c. 1300. It was probably assembled by Maximus Planudes.
it seems like this post is some kind of 'gotcha' to prove that Palestine as a name/entity has existed for thousands of years, which it has. This is beyond dispute. The name Palestine is (probably) derived from Peleset, who you might know as the Sea People, who were from the Aegean. after they had fun times (not fun times) with Ramesses III, they relocated to the southern coast of Canaan, intermarried with the Canaanites, and became known as the Philistines. The Assyrians called that regions 'Palas(h)tu' since 800 BC; the term Palestine as "Palestine" first appeared in Herodotus' Histories in the 5th century BC, and this usage continued with other Greek and Roman writers (Aristotle, Ovid, Pliny the Elder, etc.). the term Syria Palaestina (literally Palestinian Syria) was used to refer to the Roman province which was created in the 2nd century AD. this is the name we see in the map above. cool.
What's missing: the Roman province Syria Palaestina was created by incorporating the province of Judaea and surrounding areas after they were defeated by the Romans in the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135 AD (the end of the third Roman-Jewish Wars). to put a button on the issue, removing the name Judaea is commonly believed to have been a 'fuck you, we won' - as in, the name change from Judaea to Syria Palestina was done to "sever the connection of the Jews to their historical homeland".
furthermore: Judaea had been a Roman province since 6 AD and the name Judaea was a Latinized version of Judah, a kingdom founded in approximately 930 BC, that bordered the Philistine City States, as in Philistia, mentioned above. They were BOTH there. They were there concurrently with the Kingdom of Israel (Samaria). Look at this map! They are RIGHT next to each other at the SAME period in time, directly south of the kingdom of, guess who, Israel (also founded approximately 930 BC).
like damn. this is the most contentious topic on earth right now. try to provide some context to whatever historical stuff you post on this hellsite before a bunch of people (smart people! people I know and respect!) see it and share it without having a clue about the context because they aren't inclined to do any further digging and it fits with the narrative they most agree with.
7 notes
·
View notes
I don't understand why it's generally not socially acceptable to recognize your good qualities. Like I don't understand why it's bad to be a show-off or a know-it-all or to brag. Like I think most people know "those things = bad" but not why.
It also seems like people are always either waaaaay into one end of the scale where they are just so unbearably full of themselves and have preposterously high self esteem (and most people act like this is fine too? Like a lot of celebrities and white men specifically seem to be like this) and I don't understand why so many people respect them then. Or they're the complete opposite with self esteem way too low despite the fact that they have redeeming qualities.
I feel like maybe the reason it's considered bad to brag is because you might 'make' other people feel inadequate but see that seems like a stupid reason to me because the problem then is not that you stated an opinion of your own self worth but is actually that everyone else is conditioned to compare themselves to each other in a very unhealthy way. And I think instead of discouraging people from opening up about what they take pride in, what they like about themselves, what makes them feel happy or content or confident, maybe we could just be discouraging people from viewing those things as personal threats? Idk just trying to formulate some thoughts on this
62 notes
·
View notes
What is it about Zephyrus and Boreas that makes those albums hit like nothing else on the planet. Like there is so much ATMOSPHERE in that music it feels like you can drown in it.
37 notes
·
View notes
There are a couple tropes I really love in the space of Miraculous Ladybug fan works, but quite possibly my favorite is when the miraculous holders just get creature from using their powers.
Like yeah, I would say that hosting the power of an abstract concept given sentience, that got shoved into the shape of an animal and bound to a piece of jewelry, would kinda mess with your body a bit.
The little bit of this we get in canon is basically that Adrien loves being a cat and the whole Tikki munches incident.
But I love it when people give them ears and wings and tails, give them eyes that aren't quite human anymore. Fuck with their gender and their sense of body. Sometimes it's body horror, sometimes it's just aesthetic. Love it either way.
I just think it's so fun, a lot of the time it's combined with the like "when a holder and the kawami really respect and bond with each other there's nothing that can be done except having magic bleed into the holder" I think that's fun, but also just making the animal of the kwami a bigger deal is fun. Like if you're going to make it a ladybug you might as well give her wings and antenna and mirrored eyes.
6 notes
·
View notes
So there's that D&D class quiz going around, & I took it & was so deeply offended I got Paladin.
& so I have had conversations with both Bestie & Birdfriend about this grave insult & they both were like, "Well... They have a point?" & informed me that my desire to absorb hits meant for others & deep drive to help whenever I actually can & strong convictions make me a bit Paladin-coded.
& I am just so... Idk. It's just interesting to get glimpses of yourself from other people's POVs. To be told that my defining characteristics are protecting & healing others & being incredibly fighty about the things I care about... Especially as someone whose brain specifically fixates on whether I care enough, do enough, give enough... Yeah. It's just kinda wild.
Anyway, I'm now adjusting my self-perception to include the fact that if I were a D&D character, I would be an Oath of the Ancients Paladin & not a wizard & that actually that's okay.
2 notes
·
View notes
ur grading people and if they get an f theyre blocked? my main you aint a kindergarten teacher this is a microblogging platform
yeah, that's why there's that function called blocking! :) cuz this is a microblogging site! that's what microblogging platforms have! :) so you don't have to put up with people's shit! :) interesting that kindergarten teachers where you live are capable of blocking people in real life, hope you had fun with that
16 notes
·
View notes
i think its kinda funny that ibis paint is regarded as the Broke Artist App or whatever (as opposed to more mainstream programs like csp or procreate) because its free and because of how popular it is with phone + finger artists while im jusg sitting here having used ibis for a cool eight years on purpose.
like i have an ipad and an apple pencil and all theyre very nice and i absolutely could move to a more powerful program i have the resources to do so but my change averse brain has decided they like it here a lot and im not leaving
16 notes
·
View notes