#Anabasis

[weirdlookindog]

Dead Can Dance - Anabasis

#dead can dance #anabasis #Youtube

[blueindigosan]

The Mesobasis: The Inert Stage

Mesobasis (μέσωβασης) is a conceptual term that represents an intermediate or balanced state in the human experience. It is composed of two opposing dynamics, catabasis and

anabasis, which are extreme states that respectively represent moments of challenge, difficulty and decline (catabasis) and moments of improvement, achievement and promotion (anabasis).

The Mesobasis is at the center of these dynamics and reflects the notion that human life is in constant oscillation between these two poles.

Human life is a complex dance between the duality of experiences: catabasis and anabasis. The catabasis represents moments of challenge, difficulty and decline, while the

Anabasis symbolizes improvement, achievement and promotion. Between these two opposite poles emerges the notion of "Mesobasis," an intermediate state that acts as balance in the oscillation.

constant of human existence. Mesobasis, a concept that has been discussed and explored based on the duality of human life, is a state that is characterized by its indifference to

what is and what is not, as well as all aspects of duality. This state is at the heart of two contrasting dynamics, katabasis and anabasis, and has an impact

deep in the human experience. Instead of being seen as a state that has emotions or intentions of its own, Mesobasis is interpreted as an inert and mechanical state. It is a place that does not

has no ethics or moral judgment. In Mesobasis, there is no place for personal preferences or human emotions, it is simply a stage in which human experience unfolds. A

The image that can help us visualize the Mesobasis is that of a vast ocean in which light and darkness, good and evil, intertwine without distinction. It is an eclipse of everything that

we know and do not know, a convergence of dualities in an indifferent state. This graphic representation shows us how the Mesobasis acts as a balance in the midst of the forces

opposites of life. One of the key ideas here is that the Mesobasis is neutral in its essence and, ultimately, it is the human being who gives emotions and meaning to this state. The

Numerous philosophies, viewpoints and psychologies that have emerged throughout human history are tools that help us understand and make sense of Mesobasis and duality.

that we experience in everyday life.

Regarding the duration of catabasis and anabasis, it is suggested that these can be both temporary and chronic. This variability is related to the natural interaction

of the Mesobasis and the Tesla variables (energy, frequency and vibration), which adjust to these states. Prolonged catabasis and anabasis may be the result of Mesobasis

fulfilling its natural function and Tesla's variables leveling off in response to these experiences. A fundamental aspect of Mesobasis is its relationship with beliefs and systems

of beliefs. It is suggested that beliefs, luck, and metaphysical and abstract elements are effects of Tesla's variables and their convergence in this state. People can be

externally influenced by entities of other frequencies to achieve a specific purpose without their knowledge, believing that events are the product of chance or chance.

To illustrate this concept, we can turn to the wisdom of Madara Uchiha, who pointed out the intrinsic duality of existence. His famous quote: "Where there is light there are also shadows...

As long as the concept of winners exists, there will also be losers," reflects the idea that Mesobasis is a state where dualities coexist and interconnect, like reflections

in a prism Madara attempted to use his power to create a better world, but in the process, he created the opposite due to his fidelity to his wishes and the influence of Tesla's variables.

in the Mesobasis. In this context, mythological, religious and archetypal figures play a fundamental role. They are like avatars or creatures that personify the dualities of the

existence, be they gods, angels, demons, guardians or entities of the lower astral. These figures, often interpreted in a primitive way, act as intermediaries between the Mesobasis

and human experience. Although they do not directly influence our lives, they operate indirectly, using subtle methods to induce changes in our perception and experience of

reality. This induction has a profound impact on us, affecting our values, our frequency and the energy we emit. The light and the darkness, represented in these

archetypal figures, influence how we perceive and experience the reality around us. The Mesobasis is like a prism that reflects and refracts these influences, shaping our

perspectives and actions.

Within the Mesobasis, there are some concepts that help understand its operation:

Mesobasic Mithridatism:

Definition: Mesobasic Mithridatism is a concept that refers to the practice of consciously facing and experiencing small lapses of katabasis, that is, moments of challenge,

difficulty or decline, with the purpose of strengthening resistance and the ability to understand these situations. This practice is inspired by mithridatism, which involved ingesting

gradually small doses of poison to develop immunity against it.

Objective: The objective of Mesobasic Mithridatism is to learn to face challenges in a gradual and controlled manner, without being overwhelmed by them, and to acquire adaptation and resilience skills.

Application: People can apply Mesobasic Mithridatism by identifying small areas of their lives where they face difficulties or challenges and addressing them consciously and

gradually to learn from those experiences.

Mesobasic spagyrism:

Definition: Mesobasic Spagyrism is a concept that refers to the practice of consciously taking advantage of small periods of anabasis, that is, moments of achievement, pleasure or success, such as

opportunities to deeply understand the reason for that feeling of well-being and apply that understanding to everyday life. This practice is inspired by spagyria, an ancient

alchemical practice that involved the extraction and purification of active ingredients from plants for medicinal and spiritual purposes.

Objective: The objective of Mesobasic Spagyrism is to learn to recognize and appreciate moments of joy and achievement, and use them as catalysts for greater personal understanding and

emotional growth.

Application: People can apply Mesobasic Spagyrism by paying conscious attention to moments of happiness and success, analyzing what factors contribute to those moments, and

Use that understanding to improve your quality of life.

The Interconnection of Catabasis and Anabasis:

Definition: The interconnection of katabasis and anabasis in Mesobasis refers to the idea that these two opposing dynamics are intrinsically related and complement each other.

mutually in human experience. Katabasis represents moments of challenge and difficulty, while anabasis symbolizes improvement and achievement. The Mesobasis acts as a

balance between both. If none of them were related to each other, the Catabasis would only end in a scenario of death, and the Anabasis in a scenario of life without purpose or finality.

Goal: The goal of this interconnection is to enable people to experience a richer, more complete life, where challenges are opportunities for growth and achievement is met.

value it even more because of the understanding of the difficulty involved.

Application: People can apply the idea of the interconnectedness of katabasis and anabasis in their lives by recognizing that moments of challenge can lead to greater appreciation for

the moments of success and that the balance between both dynamics is essential for a meaningful life.

The Aeolipile Analogy:

Definition: The analogy of the Aeolipile is used to visualize the functioning of the Mesobasis. The Eolipila is a device that rotates due to steam expelled through curved tubes.

In this analogy, the Mesobasis resembles the air chamber in the Aeolipile, and the curved tubes represent the mechanical functioning of the catabasis with respect to the anabasis and vice versa.

Objective: The objective of this analogy is to show how the Mesobasis can constantly move and change, as if it were in a constant state of oscillation between catabasis and

anabasis. It also highlights that trying to achieve one dynamic can lead to the intermittent appearance of the other, and vice versa.

Application: This analogy can be applied to understand that life is constantly changing and that moments of challenge and achievement can alternate fluidly. It can help

people to consciously navigate between these dynamics and appreciate the dynamic nature of the human experience.

Mesobasic Forces:

Definition: Mesobasic Forces are concepts that represent the fundamental dynamics in the life of a person who experiences constant changes and transitions, such as a

oscillation between two opposite but complementary states: the Katabasic Forces and the Anabasic Forces. The applications of these Mesobasic Forces are diverse and cover the

entire life of a person. In times of katabasis, Katabasic Forces can help people face emotional challenges, develop resilience and

make informed decisions. In anabasis, Anabasic Forces can drive personal growth, goal achievement, and enjoyment of positive experiences, however,

The person must first understand what is happening, otherwise they would only reach primitive conclusions and would not be able to correctly understand what is happening, possibly misunderstanding.

the situations and the nature of what happened. It is important to understand that these forces are not static, but are in constant flux, and the Mesobasis is a continuum where both

They are present at different times and proportions. Wisdom lies in knowing how to recognize and adapt to these forces, taking advantage of both the lessons of katabasis and the

anabasis opportunities to achieve balance and continued growth in life.

Catabasic Forces: These are manifestations of the characteristics that make up the element of Catabasis. They have a predominantly depressive or negative character in their entirety

and they are essential for catabasis to occur. These forces represent the dynamics that lead to decline, slowdown, or even suffering in a person's life.

They may include experiences of loss, obstacles, emotional challenges, or any other circumstance that leads to a feeling of descent or difficulty.

Anabasic Forces: These are manifestations of the characteristics that make up the element of Anabasis. They have a mainly stimulating or positive character in their entirety and are

essential for anabasis to occur. These forces represent the dynamics that lead to growth, advancement, and positive experiences in a person's life. They can include

moments of success, opportunities, healthy relationships or any other circumstance that promotes a sense of advancement, improvement and well-being.

Within this dynamic of forces, we can observe and determine the following:

Static Agents: These agents refer to forces that remain predominantly in one of the two camps, either in that of the Katabasic Forces or in that of the Static Forces.

Anabasics. They are like constant elements that influence a person's life consistently in a particular direction. For example, a person who tends to face

obstacles and constant challenges in your life you would experience the constant influence of Static Agents of Catabasis.

Flowing Agents: On the other hand, Flowing Agents are those forces that can move and change from one field to another in the Mesobasis. These forces are not fixed in a single

state and can adapt to a person's circumstances and decisions. They can be like currents that change direction, allowing a person to experience moments

of catabasis and anabasis at different times in their lives. An example could be someone who, through a change in mentality and approach, manages to transform moments of challenge into

opportunities for growth, thus experiencing a flow of Flowing Agents from Catabasis to Anabasis.

Some of the possible forces that arise from these dynamics, or are adjacent to them, are:

Karma:

Karma as a Flowing Agent of the Mesobasic Forces: Karma manifests as a flowing agent in the Mesobasic Forces, which means that it is not limited to a single state, since

be it Catabasis or Anabasis, but flows between both states dynamically. This perspective reflects the idea that our actions and decisions can have repercussions both

positive and negative in our lives, and these repercussions are not predestined to a single state. Instead of a static, one-sided force, Karma is like a river that can

change its course in response to our actions and choices.

Conditioning and Free Will: The concept of Karma has often been associated with the conditioning of human behavior, where people seek to act in beneficial ways.

to avoid negative consequences. However, your perspective adds an additional layer by suggesting that this conditioning can be viewed through the prism of Mesobasis, where the

Constant oscillation between Catabasis and Anabasis can influence our choices. While Karma can act as a kind of reminder of the repercussions of our

actions, can also reflect how our decisions and behaviors can contribute to this oscillation between the states of the Mesobasis.

Intermittency of Catabasis and Anabasis: The notion that attempting to achieve one state can lead to the intermittent appearance of the other is especially relevant in the context of

Karma. If someone constantly strives to act in beneficial ways (Anabasis), they may encounter challenges and difficult times (Catabasis) that balance this tendency.

Likewise, those who have caused harm can experience moments of healing and redemption. This intermittency in the Mesobasis can influence how the consequences manifest themselves

karmic.

The Emission and the Return: The analogy of Mesobasis as a stone that is thrown on the surface of water, where people emit desires and actions that then return as waves,

It is a powerful metaphor for understanding Karma in action. People's emissions, whether positive or negative, are like the stones they throw in the Mesobasis, and the consequences

Karmic are the waves that return to them. This constant interaction can reflect how our actions and choices influence our experience of life and the dynamics

between Catabasis and Anabasis.

Kama/Kamaloka:

In Mesobasis, the term "Kama" refers to a category of human desires and pleasures that include not only aspects related to sexual desire, but also

all forms of desires, impulses and aspirations that people experience in their daily lives. These desires and pleasures represent a fundamental aspect of the human experience in

the Mesobasis and play an important role in the dynamics of the Catabasis and the Anabasis. The Kamaloka, on the other hand, is considered the area in which these desires manifest themselves.

and are experienced. In this context, the Kamaloka is not simply interpreted as a spiritual plane, but rather as the earthly environment in which human beings live and pursue

your wishes. It is a space where individuals generate, pursue and seek to satisfy their desires and goals.

Henri Poincaré's Perspective on Laws:

The physicist-mathematician Henri Poincaré, with his statement that a law is a "constant link between an antecedent and a consequent, between the current state of the world and its state

immediately following", introduces the idea that natural laws and causal relationships are fundamental to understanding how the world around us works. This perspective

suggests that laws establish an unbreakable connection between what happens in the present and what will happen in the future, providing a conceptual framework for understanding and predicting

phenomena.

Kamaloka as the Wish World:

Instead of using the traditional concept of Dharma, Kamaloka is interpreted as the world in which we live, a space full of desires, inclinations and goals that we wish to achieve.

Here, Kamaloka becomes a stage where individuals must chart a path and travel it effectively to achieve their desires. Efficiency in the fulfillment of desires is

crucial, since failure can lead to frustration.

Mastemah and Obstacles in Kamaloka:

Mastemah, the angel of Hebrew mythology, mentioned as an executor of divine punishments but also as the angel of trials and challenges, becomes a symbol of obstacles

and challenges that individuals encounter in the Kamaloka, as well as other avatarized figures of equivalent understanding for their respective individuals. Mastemah is considered to personify

the evils and obstacles necessary for the advancement and purification of living beings. In this context, Kama, which translates as pleasure and encompasses aspects such as love and sex, is

becomes one of the goals of life in Kamaloka.

Kama Statics and Kamaloka:

In the perspective of Mesobasis, both Kamaloka and Kama are considered static agents, created primarily from the point of view of Catabasis. These agents are

designed as "necessary evils" or "necessary obstacles" that are an integral part of the journey of living beings. They resemble sandpaper that polishes something at high speed; his

function is essential for advancement and growth.

The Relationship with Anabasis:

However, not all individuals interpret these obstacles and evils of Catabasis as fair or desirable. By fearing the unknown and by not knowing the causes and characteristics of

These elements, some try to avoid them, artificially seeking to maintain themselves in a state of Anabasis. This can lead to an Anabasis illusion that eventually becomes

Catabasis. Some individuals feel the need to exercise control over their pleasures and evils in order to understand, process and overcome the Catabasic and Anabasic elements in a way

that they can live in harmony with the dynamics of Mesobasis.

Dukkha/Sukha:

Dukkha and Sukha as Flowing Agents in Mesobasis:

Dukkha, a term commonly translated as "suffering" or "pain", can be considered a flowing agent in the context of Mesobasis. Although suffering and pain are not

Eternal, they are often prolonged and difficult to endure, which links them to the dynamics of Catabasis. Although Dukkha is not explicitly a katabasic force, its nature

Negatively relates it to this dynamic. Its counterpart in flowing terms would be Sukha, which is experienced in prolonged periods of Anabasis, where positive forces and

pleasant

Dukkha and Sukha as Enduring Elements in Catabasis and Anabasis:

Dukkha and Sukha play an important role in the duration of the periods of Catabasis and Anabasis. These elements influence the human experience during these dynamics. Although they are not

The only forces at play, they contribute significantly to the way people experience these periods of ups and downs in their lives. Dukkha and Sukha are mainly the

longevity elements of the periods of Catabasis and Anabasis, among other influential elements in the periods of both dynamics, as well as the functioning of human beings

with respect to these dynamics.

Visualizing Mesobasis as an Undulating Dynamic:

Instead of using the image of yin and yang to represent the duality between good and evil, the Mesobasis can be understood as a serpentine line with black and white dots on it.

each space respectively, in an infinite grayish space. This representation symbolizes the indeterminacy of Mesobasis and how its dynamics of Catabasis and Anabasis resemble a

wave in constant motion. This image reflects the oscillating nature of the Mesobasis and its role in the life of living beings.

The Duality between Ego and Soul and its Relationship with Dukkha and Sukha:

In the context of human beings, there is a duality between the ego and the soul. Some people focus more on their selfish desires and the pursuit of material pleasures, while others

others focus on spiritual growth and self-understanding. This duality relates to the dynamic between Dukkha and Sukha. Dukkha represents the sufferings and periods

of Catabasis that people experience when they follow their selfish desires, while Sukha represents the pleasures and periods of Anabasis that arise when they focus on their development

spiritual.

The Importance of Balance in Mesobasis:

It should be noted that no extreme is beneficial, whether it is an eternal Anabasis or an eternal Catabasis. Instead of these extremes, the ideal life involves finding a balance between

Catabasic and Anabasic forces in Mesobasis. This search for balance is essential for a harmonious and fulfilling life, where both Dukkha and Sukha can be understood and appreciated.

integral parts of the human experience.

Hermetic Laws:

The Hermetic Laws, derived from the teachings attributed to Hermes Trismegistus, are philosophical and spiritual principles that describe the fundamental laws of the universe and

reality. Although these laws are metaphysical and spiritual concepts, we can analyze how they would relate to the dynamics of the Mesobasis that you have described, considering their functions,

objectives and nature.

Law of Mentalism: This law holds that "Everything is mind; the universe is mental." In the context of Mesobasis, it could be considered a static agent, as it establishes the basis for

the creation and perception of reality. The Mesobasis could reflect the interaction of the universal mind with the dynamics of Catabasis and Anabasis, thus creating the human experience.

In other words, this law tells us and clarifies that humanity functions as a prism that constantly and continuously reflects everything it interacts with, including each other.

Law of Correspondence: This law states that "What is above is like what is below, and what is below is like what is above." In the context of Mesobasis, it could be seen

as a flowing agent, since it suggests an interconnection between the higher and lower levels of existence, a more tangible way of interpreting the states of Catabasis and Anabasis.

This law tells us and clarifies that there are positive and negative aspects, and just as there is a positive part (Anabasis), there is also its negative analogue (Catabasis).

Law of Vibration: This law holds that "Nothing is still; everything moves; everything vibrates." In Mesobasis, vibrations could be interpreted as constant changes between states

of Catabasis and Anabasis. It would be a flowing agent that describes how people experience fluctuations in their lives. In other words, the indeterminate oscillation between these two states

and its multiple agents, forces and repercussions, as well as periods of stay and periods of absence in human life are caused by the constant movement of the inert Mesobasis. When

send "good vibes" or "bad vibes" can be elements or minor versions of this law, as a way of expressing our gratitude or discomfort towards something specific.

Law of Polarity: This law states that "Everything is dual; everything has poles; everything has its pair of opposites." In the context of the Mesobasis, it could be related to the dynamics between Catabasis

and Anabasis. It would be a flowing agent, since people experience both negative and positive states throughout their lives. It is evident that this law teaches us that the only thing exempt

of duality is Mesobasis itself, and that the elements that circulate and undulate indefinitely through it are the states of Catabasis and Anabasis, as well as light and shadows, good and evil.

evil, heaven and earth, above and below, etc.

Law of Rhythm: This law holds that "Everything ebbs and flows; everything has its periods of advance and retreat, everything rises and falls." This law would be directly related to Mesobasis,

since it describes the cycles of Catabasis and Anabasis. The periods of oscillation between these states could be seen as a constant ebb and flow. We must also take into account the fact that

that pursuing one state can intermittently lead us to another and vice versa, showing the complexity of how these undulating states work in our own lives.

Law of Cause and Effect: This law states that "Every cause has its effect; every effect has its cause." In Mesobasis, this law could be interpreted as a description of how the

A person's actions (causes) lead to consequences (effects) that are influenced by their states of Catabasis and Anabasis, depending on the longevity of these states and the intensity

of them in the person, being able to twist or rectify their decisions, their actions, their reactions and their repercussions.

Law of Gender: Although this law is not a common part of the Hermetic laws, some interpretations include the "Law of Generation", which holds that "Everything reproduces itself from its like."

In this law, it is suggested that living beings have the ability to generate two types of energy or particles: Bions and Loosh. These elements are directly associated with the states of

Catabasis and Anabasis, which represent fundamental aspects of the dynamics of Mesobasis. The idea behind this statement is that these two types of energy, Loosh and Bions, are

intrinsically related and perpetuate each other. It is suggested that Catabasis and Anabasis are components of a continuous wave in Mesobasis, where the transition between these

states is fluid and constant. Although Katabasic and Anabasic states may differ in their characteristics, this perspective argues that they are interconnected and interconnected.

they influence each other.

-Loosh: It is described as the vital energy that living beings emanate when they experience negative emotions or feelings of fear. In other words, when people go through

Moments of suffering, sadness or tension are believed to release Loosh. This is related to Catabasis, which represents a depressive or negative state in the dynamics of Mesobasis.

-Biones: They are mentioned as translucent particles that emanate from living beings when they experience positive emotions or feelings of happiness and well-being. The Biones associate with

Anabasis, which represents a stimulating or positive state in the dynamics of Mesobasis.

Weltschmerz/Weltliebe:

In the dynamics of Mesobasis, Weltschmerz and Weltliebe can influence a person's perception and experience. Weltschmerz can lead to a state of discouragement and pessimism, which

It can make a person feel disconnected or dissatisfied with reality. On the other hand, Weltliebe can promote joy, gratitude and acceptance, which can lead to a

feeling of connection and satisfaction with the world around the person. Both concepts can be a natural part of the human experience and can vary in intensity depending on the

circumstances and influences of the Mesobasis. Ultimately, the ability to balance these two perspectives can be important in finding a sense of harmony and well-being.

in a person's life.

Weltschmerz: This notion refers to the feeling of sadness or melancholy that a person feels when they perceive that the real world can never live up to their expectations or desires.

In the context of Mesobasis, Weltschmerz could be related to the experience of Catabasis. When katabasic forces dominate, people may feel

overwhelmed by the perception that the world is a place full of suffering, disappointment and disenchantment. Catabasis can lead to a feeling of disconnection and pessimism regarding

reality. The term Weltschmerz means "Pain of the World" and manifests itself as a pessimistic view of the world.

Weltliebe: On the other hand, Weltliebe could be interpreted as the ability to love and accept the real world as it is, even when it does not meet all expectations and desires. In

the context of the Mesobasis, this could be related to the Anabasis. When anabasic forces predominate, people can experience a deep appreciation for beauty.

and the potential of the real world, despite its imperfections. Weltliebe could manifest as an attitude of gratitude, love and optimism towards life and the environment. The term Weltliebe

It means "Love of the World" and manifests itself as an optimistic vision of the world.

Mesobasic Times and Stays:

The dynamics of Catabasis and Anabasis are not necessarily limited by fixed and defined periods of time, but are cyclical processes that can vary in duration and frequency.

However, in a general sense, certain periods or cycles can be identified in which these dynamics appear to be more prominent or intense. These periods may vary depending on the

cultural and social circumstances and contexts. Below I provide you with an overview of these periods:

Catabasis:

Cycles of Challenge: Periods of Catabasis are often characterized by challenges, obstacles and difficult times in a person's life or in society in general. These challenges can

manifest themselves as conflicts, economic crises, natural disasters, periods of war, etc.

Periods of Suffering: During Catabasis, people may experience emotional, physical or psychological suffering. This suffering can be individual or collective and can last

from days or weeks to years, depending on the situation.

Transformation Through Pain: Catabasis is often associated with moments of deep learning and personal transformation. Through pain and adversity, people can

gain perspective, develop resilience and learn important lessons.

Anabasis:

Prosperity Cycles: Anabasis periods tend to be marked by prosperity, growth and harmony. These can be times of economic stability, advances

scientific and technological, peace and international cooperation, among others.

Periods of Well-being: During Anabasis, people usually experience greater emotional, physical and psychological well-being. Quality of life can improve significantly, and

Personal development opportunities are often more accessible.

Growth and Creativity: Anabasis can encourage personal growth, creativity and innovation. People can feel inspired and motivated to explore new

ideas and projects during these periods.

Periods of Prolonged Catabasis (Kali Yuga, Ragnarok, Apocalypse, Wars, etc.): During these periods, humanity may face significant challenges, conflicts and suffering.

Katbasic forces dominate, leading to a widespread perception that the world is a dark and desolate place. Spiritual and moral values can be eroded, and

Violence and chaos may prevail. People may feel trapped in a cycle of endless suffering, desperately searching for an Anabasis to bring them relief. During

During these times, people can develop a survival mentality, focused on the fight to survive in a hostile world. They may be prone to mistrust, fear

and aggression as defense mechanisms. Morals can be eroded, and the pursuit of immediate pleasures can be a way to escape suffering.

Periods of Prolonged Anabasis (Satya Yuga, Paradise, Elysian Fields, Heaven, etc.): In contrast, during these periods, humanity can experience peace and prosperity without

precedents. Anabasic forces predominate, leading to a feeling of harmony and well-being. People can live in a state of comfort and abundance, and there can be a lack

of significant challenges to overcome. This can result in complacency and a lack of motivation for personal growth and improvement because they are not faced with significant obstacles.

During these times, people can become complacent and content with the current state of things. They may seek instant gratification and avoid any form of challenge or

effort. Lack of adversity can lead to a decrease in resilience and the ability to cope with difficulties.

Generators of Catabasic Dynamics: Human beings are capable of generating events, actions or thoughts that feed the dynamics of Catabasis. This can occur when the

People act in selfish, destructive, or negative ways toward themselves or others. Your actions can contribute to an environment of suffering, conflict and despair. For example,

Wars, social injustice, and violent behavior are examples of human-generated manifestations of Catabasis.

Generators of Anabasic Dynamics: Similarly, human beings can also be active agents in the generation of anabasic dynamics. When people act in ways

altruistic, loving and constructive, contribute to the dynamics of Anabasis. Your actions can promote peace, harmony and well-being in your environment. The search for social justice,

Compassion and solidarity are examples of manifestations of Anabasis generated by human beings.

Balance and Mesobasis: Some people learn to live with both sides of these dynamics instead of becoming polarized at one extreme. They understand that life is full of nuances and that

both Catabasis and Anabasis are inherent aspects of the human experience. They seek a balance between their actions and decisions, recognizing the importance of facing challenges

and obstacles, but also to contribute to well-being and positive evolution.

Human Interactions: Relationships between people can be examples of how human beings interact as channels of these dynamics. Some people can play roles of

support and empowerment (Anabasis) for others, while some may represent challenges and obstacles (Catabasis). These interactions can be complex and vary depending on the

circumstances. One human being can be the Catabasis of another, just as one human being can be the Anabasis of another, resonating or rejecting each other.

Semicender:

"Semiscender" is a proposed neologism that is etymologically derived from the word "Mesobasis." In this context, "Semiscender" is conceived as the Latin translation of what

"Mesobasis" means. The idea behind this word is to represent the notion of an intermediate or balanced state in human experience, similar to how "Mesobasis" reflects the idea

of being in the center or passing through a middle between two opposite dynamics, such as katabasis (descent) and anabasis (ascent). More simply put, "Semiscender" could be understood

as "passing through the middle" or "advancing through the means", highlighting the idea of balance and transition in the human experience. Some characteristics of this concept are:

Recognition of dual states: The person is aware that life is full of moments of challenge and difficulty (katabasis) as well as achievement and advancement (anabasis).

Conscious navigation: Instead of being carried away by these states, the person develops the ability to consciously navigate through them. This means that it is not

He clings excessively to moments of success nor fully immerses himself in moments of difficulty.

Search for balance: The person actively seeks a balance between these dual states. Understand that excesses in either direction can be harmful,

such as not sleeping at all or always sleeping. Therefore, seek to maintain a middle ground that is healthy and beneficial to be able to deal and manage it in a better way.

Resistance and Resilience: The practice of "Semi-cender" involves developing the resistance and resilience necessary to overcome challenges and obstacles without being overwhelmed by

they. It also means learning to appreciate moments of success without falling into complacency or arrogance. People with the ability to "Semi-cender" might be more resistant to

extreme emotional fluctuations. They would be able to face challenges and difficulties (catabasis) without falling into despair and enjoy moments of success and joy (anabasis).

without falling into excessive euphoria.

Mental Balance: A "Semicension" would imply the ability to maintain a balanced state of mind amidst the fluctuations of life. It would be the ability to stay calm and

mental clarity both in moments of challenge and in moments of success.

Emotional Balance: A Semiscension could manifest as a balanced emotional state, where a person is able to experience both moments of challenge and difficulty (catabasis).

as moments of achievement and joy (anabasis) without being overwhelmed by either extreme. Instead of fluctuating between emotional highs and lows, the person is in a state of

emotional balance in which you can manage challenges calmly and appreciate successes without excesses of euphoria.

Adaptation to changes: Semiscension could involve the ability to adapt effectively to changes in life. Instead of resisting change (catabasis) or clinging

to comfort (anabasis), the person can go through changes with flexibility and acceptance. This means you can deal with transitions in a less traumatic way and take advantage of

the opportunities that arise. Adaptability would be a prominent characteristic of those who can "Semi-Cend". They would be able to adjust to different circumstances and changes in

life without experiencing overwhelming stress or unsustainable euphoria.

Constant Learning: Those who practice "Semicension" could be avid learners of life, drawing lessons and wisdom from both difficulties and achievements.

This would contribute to constant personal growth.

Flexibility of thought: The "Semicension" could be related to the ability to maintain an open and flexible mind, avoiding extremes of dogmatic thinking and being

able to see nuances and grayscales in complex situations.

Tolerance of Uncertainty: People with "Semiscension" may be more tolerant of life's uncertainty and less disturbed by unexpected changes and challenges.

Balanced decision making: In a Semiscension, important decisions are made in a balanced and conscious manner. The person does not get carried away by emotional impulses or

is paralyzed by fear, but carefully evaluates the options and chooses a path that lies in the middle between excess caution and excess audacity.

Awareness and Self-Observation: "Semicension" would require a deep awareness of oneself and one's own emotional and mental reactions to challenges and achievements. This

It would include the ability to observe oneself impartially and reflect on how one is responding to different situations.

"In the 'Semicension' perspective, life is not reduced to a black and white dichotomy, but rather presents itself as a complex range of shades of gray. Sometimes, certain moments

They may seem more extreme to us, either towards black or white, due to the temporal duration of the katabasis or anabasis experience compared to others. This can lead us to

feeling like we have made a significant discovery, when in reality we are observing the constant interplay of human dynamics over time. In other words, not

"We are not necessarily discovering something entirely new, but rather exploring the richness of nuances and transitions that exist in the human experience."

"It is highly plausible that the constant interaction between Catabasis (the descent or diminution) and Anabasis (the rise or growth) has given rise to the existence of states

differentials in duality. This suggests that, before Mesobasis, reality was characterized by undifferentiated chaos, similar to the concept of 'Wuji' in Eastern philosophy. In

In this state, neither Catabasis (representing death) nor Anabasis (representing life) existed, implying the absence of a discernible beginning or purpose. Everything was a

disorder of unimaginable proportions.

Some tools used in the Semiscension to go through the multitudinous states of catabasis and anabasis are:

The Placebo Effect and the Nocebo Effect are concepts that can have a significant impact on people's lives in the context of the Mesobasis. The Placebo and Nocebo effects

They are concepts that represent positive and negative beliefs, respectively, that human beings have and that can influence their experiences and outcomes in life. They are poles

They are opposite in the perception of reality, but often go unnoticed as people rarely reflect on them. Both effects can have a significant impact on

people's lives, affecting health, performance, resilience and relationships. They are a powerful reminder of how the mind can influence the perception of reality and the perception of reality.

people's ability to overcome challenges. In addition, most people often operate in a Mesobasis-like state, where they go through life on autopilot.

without paying conscious attention to their experiences. When one of these effects, either Placebo or Nocebo, peaks, people can enter a pilot state.

automatic in which your emotions and thoughts are adjusted to deal with the situation at that moment, forgetting other important elements. This can occur both in situations

negative as well as positive, reflecting how these effects can influence perception and reaction to reality. The consequences of

Both effects:

Beliefs as Tangible Realities:

A fascinating feature of the Placebo and Nocebo effects is that they can turn beliefs into tangible realities for those who experience them. Often, these beliefs are not

Backed by solid or verifiable evidence, but to the person holding them, they are as real as any proven fact. This highlights the power of the human mind to mold.

the perception and experience of reality.

Irresistible Force and Immovable Object:

The analogy of the irresistible force encountering an immovable object illustrates the dynamics behind these effects. When someone has an unconditional belief in the Effect

Placebo or Nocebo (the irresistible force), and this belief meets the effect itself (the immovable object), inevitable consequences are triggered. This interaction can

be so powerful that it defies conventional boundaries of what would be considered possible.

"Mind over Matter":

The interplay between belief and effect is an impressive example of "mind over matter." This implies that our minds have considerable power to influence our

perception of reality and, in some cases, even in the physical world around us. Some extreme examples include the ability to lift heavy objects with what has been

called "Hysterical Strength" or the development of skills such as Telekinesis, Mediumship or Force Transmission as seen in the Fa Jin. Even perception and interaction

With frequency entities, such as ghosts, spirits or other beings from different planes, they can be attributed to the influence of these effects.

Limiters and Limiters of the Mind, Body and Spirit:

The Placebo and Nocebo effects play crucial roles as limiters and limiters in the human experience. Act as barriers or gateways that can be opened or closed

according to an individual's beliefs and perceptions. On the one hand, they can limit potential by creating self-imposed obstacles based on negative beliefs. On the other hand, they can release

Unlimited potential by stimulating positive beliefs that propel the body and mind toward exceptional achievements. These effects operate on the physical, mental and spiritual levels, shaping

the human experience in its entirety.

Relationship with the Influence Field:

The Placebo and Nocebo effects are not isolated phenomena; they are intricately connected to the Influencer Field that surrounds people. This field is a constant flow of influences.

positive and negative that can affect an individual's beliefs, perceptions, and emotional states. When the influencer field leans towards positive values, it can enhance

Placebo effects and vice versa. This highlights the importance of maintaining a positive influence on the environment to foster healthy beliefs and perceptions.

Impact of Subconscious Beliefs:

Subconscious beliefs play a fundamental role in shaping an individual's reality. Often, these beliefs are deep and ingrained, making them

difficult to change consciously. The Placebo and Nocebo effects operate largely at the subconscious level, meaning they can have a significant impact on form.

in which a person sees himself and his place in the world. This underscores the importance of exploring and understanding subconscious beliefs to facilitate positive change.

Human Interaction and Mental Models:

The interaction between people can be fertile ground for the spread of Placebo and Nocebo effects. Beliefs and perceptions can be contagious, and people can

influence each other in a variety of ways. This means that the conclusions people reach can be influenced by interaction with others and fit into their needs.

Collective mental models. It is essential to be aware of how human interactions can shape our beliefs and perceptions, and to be willing to question and reevaluate.

constantly what we take for granted.

The Need for a Holistic View:

The take-home message is that reality is complex and multifaceted, and judging people or situations by first impressions or superficial beliefs can be misleading. As well as

No ant can see beyond the top of a tree but that does not negate the existence of the sky beyond that crown, nor can we fully evaluate people or situations.

based on a single perspective. A holistic view is needed that involves constantly reviewing and reevaluating to properly understand and utilize the complexity of life and life.

reality that surrounds us.

Socialization Theory:

The socialization theory proposed here suggests that each individual's social interaction and distorted cognitive perception (DCP) are influenced by the dynamics between

Catabasis and Anabasis, and how these forces impact the Mesobasis. Here are several key elements of this theory (28-08-2020):

DCP as Personal Reality: As mentioned in the theory, DCP refers to the personal reality or subjective view of reality that an individual experiences. This perception

It is influenced by sensory signals and the interpretation that the individual makes according to his mental model. In the context of the Mesobasis, DCP reflects how each individual is

it is in a state of equilibrium between the forces of Catabasis and Anabasis.

Interparticular Reality: The idea of an "Interparticular Reality" suggests that when two individuals share similar beliefs and values, they can co-create a shared reality.

This can be related to the Mesobasis, as it represents a state in which two people tune their Energy, Frequency, and Vibration variables to a similar level, which gives them

It allows you to experience an intermediate reality based on your shared beliefs.

Collective Realities: "Collective Realities" represent the interaction of three or more individuals in a broader social dynamic. These realities are formed when values

of Energy, Frequency and Vibration converge between multiple people. In the context of the Mesobasis, collective realities can be seen as a reflection of how interaction

Social media can influence an individual's Mesobasis by aligning their beliefs with those of a larger group.

Organic Mobile Equalizer: The idea that each individual functions as a "living, organic mobile equalizer" highlights people's ability to adapt to their environment and

your social interactions. This can relate to how individuals adjust their beliefs and perceptions to fit into their social contexts and how they can influence them.

in the Mesobasis of others.

Unconscious Frequency Adjustment: It is emphasized that these adjustments in "frequencies" (representing beliefs, attitudes, perceptions, etc.) usually occur in a manner that

unconscious. Individuals adapt their values according to different influences and circumstances, such as environmental factors, personal experiences, interpersonal relationships, and more.

Interconnected Network of Realities: The theory describes life as an "infinite network of interconnected realities." Each individual is a part of this network and has his own reality or reality.

set of values. These individual realities are in constant interaction and change, influenced by internal and external factors.

Analogy of "World as an Organic Version of the Usenet": In this analogy, the world and the reality lived by individuals are compared with the Usenet, an ancient communication network

online. The Usenet was a system in which people shared information and opinions in the form of messages in different thematic groups. When comparing the world with the Usenet,

suggests that the world is a vast system of interactions and communication between individuals, just as the online Usenet was.

Simultaneous Fluctuation: "Simultaneous fluctuation" refers to the fact that these interconnected realities are constantly changing simultaneously. This implies that, as

As individuals adjust their values and beliefs, those modifications have an impact on the entire network of realities. In other words, changes in perception and actions

of one person can affect other people and thus influence the overall dynamics.

Getting along and rejecting: When two people interact, their "Personal Realities" come into play. If both people have similar or identical values, beliefs, and perceptions, it is

They are more likely to get along and connect on a deep level. On the other hand, if their "Personal Realities" are very different, they are more likely to experience friction and clashes in

their interaction.

Law of Inverse Magnetism: This law describes how individuals tend to attract those whose "Personal Realities" are similar or complementary. Values and perceptions

Similar differences act as a magnet that attracts people, while significant differences in "Personal Realities" can lead to dispersion and estrangement. The

Like Attract, Opposites Scatter: This part of the message highlights the idea that, just like in physics, where opposite magnetic poles attract and equals

In social interactions, people with similar "Personal Realities" tend to feel greater affinity and connection, while those with similar perceptions and

Opposing values may experience discord and estrangement.

Leibniz Binary System: The binary system, proposed by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, is a number system that uses only two digits, 1 and 0, to represent all information.

In this system, 1 represents a true or active condition, while 0 represents a false or inactive condition. Used in computer science to represent and process data

efficiently. As in the binary system where values are limited to 1 and 0, in personal realities, values that move away from one's own perceptions and beliefs

of an individual are seen as alien or incompatible.

Difference in Values in Collective Realities: Here it is pointed out that the more individual values differ within a group that forms a "Collective Reality," the greater the

Probability of mutual rejection. Values can refer to beliefs, perceptions, opinions, attitudes, and other aspects of the "Personal Realities" of group members.

Examples: Examples are provided to illustrate this idea:

"AUC – AUC (100%)" implies that when the values within the group are identical, the probability of rejection is low, that is, there is a high mutual acceptance.

"ABC – ACD (50%)" suggests that when there is some similarity in values but also differences, the probability of rejection is moderate, which means that some people may

get along while others may not.

"ABC – NXZY (1%)" shows that when the values are very different or practically opposite, the probability of rejection is high, indicating low mutual acceptance.

Probability of Rejection: The probability of rejection is related to the discrepancy in individual values. The more divergent these values are, the greater the chance of

that people in the "Collective Reality" do not relate or have difficulty connecting.

Placebo/Nocebo Impact:

The Placebo effect and the Nocebo effect have significant applications in socialization theory in the context of the Mesobasis, as they influence how people perceive

and respond to their social environment and shared realities. Here are some key applications of these effects in this theory:

Influence on Interparticular Reality: The Placebo effect and the Nocebo effect can influence how individuals relate to and create an "Interparticular Reality". When the

An individual's beliefs are positive and optimistic (Placebo effect), they are more likely to get along and connect with people who share those beliefs. Conversely, if someone

has negative and pessimistic beliefs (Nocebo effect), is more likely to distance yourself from those who share those perceptions. These effects can modulate how they form and maintain

social relations in the Mesobasis. Following the rule of magnetic attraction and repulsion, opposite poles attract and similar poles repulse, this law is reversed in this

context, being that positive or negative influences are attracted to their peers, and not to their antonic values.

Impact on Collective Realities: When a group of individuals share positive (Placebo effect) or negative (Nocebo effect) beliefs, this can influence the formation of

"Collective Realities". For example, a group with a positive and optimistic attitude can create a collective reality that reinforces those beliefs and provides a supportive environment.

On the other hand, a group with negative beliefs can reinforce those perceptions and generate a pessimistic environment. These effects can contribute to cohesion or division within

social groups. From the diversity itself arises the conflict, since each one is bordering with a reality well similar, or different, depending on the values of these.

Adaptation to Social Norms: The Placebo and Nocebo effects can lead people to adapt to shared social norms and values. If an individual is in a

In an environment where the placebo effect and positive beliefs prevail, you are likely to adjust your perception and attitude to fit into that context. Similarly, if an environment is

Dominated by the Nocebo effect and negative beliefs, it is possible for people to align with those perceptions to adapt. See the "Ghettos" or the "Private Cities".

Construction of Social Reality: Ultimately, the Placebo effect and the Nocebo effect can contribute to the construction of social reality in the Mesobasis. These effects

They influence how people interpret social cues, interact with each other, and build their own "reality bubbles" based on shared beliefs. This can lead to

to the formation of communities with similar perceptions and shared values, or to communities with antonime perceptions and totally differential values.

Placebo effect:

The Placebo Effect often originates from positive and optimistic beliefs. It is the result of a mindset in which a person believes that something, whether it is a medical treatment, a practice.

of well-being or a situation in life, will have a beneficial impact. The Placebo Effect is derived from positive and optimistic beliefs. It occurs when someone firmly believes that something, such as

A medical treatment or a situation in life, will have a beneficial effect. This effect may be related to periods of Anabasis, passing the Catabasis or advance in the

Mesobasis. It works as a form of somatization of thoughts and feelings, generating an objective value based on frequency and vibration. The Placebo Effect is not limited to health,

It can impact various fields of life, even if it is not supported by verifiable facts. This effect can influence several aspects of life:

Improvement in health: When a person firmly believes that a medical treatment or alternative therapy will help them, they can experience a real improvement in their health. This may include

a decrease in symptoms and an overall sense of well-being.

Improved performance: In non-medical contexts, positive beliefs can improve performance on personal tasks and goals. People who are confident in their ability to achieve

Some tend to succeed and reach their goals more easily.

Increased resilience: Belief in the ability to overcome obstacles can increase resilience. People who believe they can handle difficult situations tend to adapt better

to life's challenges.

Emotional well-being: The Placebo Effect can also influence emotional well-being. Positive beliefs about life and relationships can lead to greater satisfaction and

Optimistic view of the world.

Nocebo Effect:

The Nocebo Effect originates from negative and pessimistic beliefs. It arises when a person anticipates a negative or harmful impact on a situation, treatment, or experience. The Nocebo Effect

It arises from negative and pessimistic beliefs. It occurs when someone anticipates a negative or harmful outcome in a situation, treatment, or experience. This is often related to

periods of Catabasis, lack of Anabasis or stagnation in the Mesobasis. Like the Placebo Effect, the Nocebo Effect somatizes thoughts and feelings, generating objective value.

in frequency and vibration, but in a negative direction. The consequences can be harmful:

Worsening health: Negative beliefs can contribute to worsening health. When someone expects to feel unwell, they are more likely to experience symptoms and discomfort,

even if there is no underlying medical cause.

Decreased performance: In everyday situations, negative beliefs can lead to poor performance. Lack of confidence in one's ability can cause

People feel insecure and have difficulty achieving their goals.

Reduced resilience: The anticipation of negative outcomes can diminish a person's ability to deal with challenges. This can lead to an increased sense of discomfort

during stressful situations.

Strained relationships: Negative beliefs about others or distrust can lead to conflict and strained relationships. When you expect the worst from people, you're more likely to

interpersonal conflicts are experienced.

Influence Field: Within the context of the Scemiscension, we could consider the "Influence Field" as the general sphere of influences that surround an individual in their environment. Are

Influences can come from various sources, such as circumstances, people, environment and natural elements. Understanding and managing this influential field is essential for making decisions.

informed and maintain a balance in life. This awareness can help people discern between authentic and artificial influences, which is especially relevant in the

current society, characterized by an overwhelming amount of stimuli.

Sensory Vision: "Sensory Vision" can be seen as an ability that allows people to detect subtle layers of information in their environment and better understand the composition

of the perceived elements. This can help discern between authentic emotions and stimuli and those that are artificial or external influences. "Sensory Vision" is not limited to

sight in the traditional sense, but refers to a deeper perception of reality.

Thought Spheres: The ability to perceive "Thought Spheres" could be understood as a way of visualizing the influences and thoughts surrounding a person at a moment.

given. These spheres could represent different ideas, emotions or thoughts that are present in your influential field. Individuals can develop the ability to discern and

Consciously select the spheres of thought that you wish to attract and allow into your lives, which can influence your experiences and decisions.

Anteideas: "Anteideas" are initial conceptions or concepts that are formed in a person's mind when they are in a particular situation or context. These conceptions

They can arise through judgment, imagination, or understanding of something specific. They are like seeds of thought that germinate in the mind before they are fully developed.

in conscious thoughts. "Anteideas" represent the stage prior to conscious thought and may be related to beliefs, opinions or incipient ideas that have not yet been realized.

fully developed. Imagine that you find yourself in a new and unknown situation. Before you can form fully conscious thoughts about that situation, it is likely

Let your mind generate initial "Anteideas" based on your previous experience, prejudices or intuition. These "Anteideas" can influence how you perceive and react to the situation, although

You haven't had time to process it completely yet.

Pre-Thoughts: The "Pre-Thoughts" are a later phase of development of the "Anteideas". They represent the evolution of those initial seeds of thought towards a more

advanced consciousness. "Pre-Thoughts" are inclinations, acceptances or definitions that form in the mind as the person interacts more deeply with an idea,

particular situation or experience. These initial thoughts begin to take shape and gain more substance as attention and reflection are given to them. When an "Anteidea"

It is nourished with conscious attention and allowed to evolve, it becomes a "Pre-Thought". "Pre-Thoughts" may be associated with greater clarity and understanding of

a specific topic, and can influence a person's decisions and actions. They are like intermediate steps between initial perception and the complete formation of a conscious idea.

Subliminal Suggestion Tools (HSS): Subliminal Suggestion Tools (HSS) are a set of skills and techniques that help deal with the elements that different

Periods of Catabasis and Anabasis present or manifest in our lives. As some periods are determinative or indeterminant, one must be aware of when they begin and when

They end up adapting in the best way, and for this, these tools may be the most favorable for this purpose. These tools are made up of Contextual Engineering,

Social Engineering, Persuasion, Manipulation, Lateral Thinking and Vertical Thinking.

Contextual Engineering: Contextual Engineering is an advanced discipline that transcends the conventional analysis of the environment and delves into a deeper study of the elements that

surround our daily lives. This practice focuses on identifying and understanding both the tangible components and the subtle details and qualities that our peripheral senses

They capture the environment that surrounds us. In essence, Contextual Engineering seeks to go beyond the obvious, exploring the less obvious dimensions of the reality that surrounds us. This includes

not only what we can perceive with the naked eye, but also aspects such as subtext, subtleties in communication, nuances in people's personalities and their intentions.

underlying. To achieve a deeper understanding, Contextual Engineering uses detailed observation and precise interpretation of signs and signals, as well as language.

body, which could normally go unnoticed.

Social Engineering: Social Engineering in Mesobasis involves the application of techniques and strategies to understand and manage social dynamics and interpersonal relationships.

during times of change and transition in a person's life. In this phase, people may be experiencing personal challenges, important decisions, or adaptations to new

circumstances. Social Engineering can help foster effective communication, empathy and understanding between individuals facing similar situations. It may involve the

creation of social support networks, facilitation of discussion groups or development of strategies to overcome specific social obstacles that arise during Mesobasis. During

Catabasis, Social Engineering can play an important role in managing personal crises or overcoming emotional obstacles. Can help people connect

with support resources, such as therapists or support groups, and provide strategies to address mental or emotional health issues. Furthermore, Social Engineering can contribute to the

rebuilding damaged interpersonal relationships during difficult times. In Anabasis, Social Engineering can be used to foster collaboration, networking and

personal growth. It can help people establish strong professional and personal relationships, as well as identify opportunities for personal and professional development.

It may also include strategies to improve communication and influence in an ever-evolving social environment.

Persuasion: Persuasion in the context of Mesobasis refers to the ability to influence the beliefs, attitudes, decisions and actions of other people deliberately and

effective. This ability is applied considering the specific dynamics of Mesobasis, which is a concept that involves constant changes and oscillations in people's lives.

Here, Persuasion becomes a crucial tool to navigate and take advantage of these changes constructively. In Mesobasis, Persuasion is based on deeply understanding

to people and their constantly evolving circumstances. To do this, it is essential to use empathy and keen observation to identify their needs, desires and pain points in

each phase of catabasis (descent) and anabasis (ascent). Persuasion has both passive and active applications in Mesobasis, as well as in the periods of Catabasis and Anabasis. Each

approach is purposeful and adaptable to the different situations that may arise in a person's life during these periods of constant change. Active Persuasion involves a

more direct and proactive approach to influencing another person's beliefs or actions. In this approach, the persuader takes an active position by presenting arguments, providing

information and deliberately use persuasive tactics. Some characteristics and applications in the mentioned dynamics are: Key characteristics: Deliberate approach,

direct communication, presentation of solid arguments, use of persuasive tactics. Application in Mesobasis: In moments of change or transition in a person's life, such as

Mesobasis, Active Persuasion can be valuable. It can help guide people in making important decisions or adopt new perspectives when facing challenges or

opportunities. Application in Catabasis: During phases of descent or difficulties (Catabasis), Active Persuasion may be necessary to provide support, motivation and guidance

to people who may be struggling with difficult problems or decisions. Application in Anabasis: In stages of personal growth and development (Anabasis), Active Persuasion

can be used to encourage the exploration of new opportunities, goals and aspirations.

Manipulation: Manipulation in Mesobasis refers to the strategic use of influence and persuasion to guide and guide people in times of change or transition in their lives.

lives. This technique is applied ethically and carefully with the goal of helping individuals make informed and beneficial decisions during this period. The manipulation in

This context is based on a deep understanding of people's needs and desires, as well as empathy towards their personal situations. It may involve the presentation of

information effectively, creating positive scenarios and guiding towards options that are consistent with the goals and values of the person in question. In the Catabasis,

Manipulation can be used to provide emotional and psychological support. This may include using truths to help people understand and process their challenges.

emotions and overcome obstacles. For example, a therapist may use ethical manipulation to guide an individual through a therapeutic process, using truths to

explore and address personal problems. In Anabasis, manipulation can be applied to help people achieve their goals and potentials. It may involve the use of

truths and persuasion strategies to motivate people to take action and seize opportunities for personal and professional growth. For example, a mentor may use

ethical manipulation to guide a student or professional in the development of their skills and the pursuit of ambitious goals.

Lateral Thinking and Vertical Thinking: Lateral thinking and vertical thinking are two distinct cognitive approaches that play a crucial role in Mesobasis and

how people approach the challenges and opportunities in their lives.

Lateral Thinking: Lateral thinking involves a non-linear way of approaching problems and situations. It is characterized by creativity, the search for innovative solutions and

exploration of new perspectives. In Mesobasis, lateral thinking is used to stimulate innovation and adaptation to changing circumstances. The people who employ

Lateral thinkers are able to see unusual connections between ideas and events, allowing them to find out-of-the-ordinary solutions and take advantage of unconventional opportunities.

Lateral thinking plays a crucial role in Catabasis by allowing people to explore new perspectives and approaches to overcome emotional and psychological challenges.

During Catabasis, it is common to face mental blocks, feelings of despair or a lack of motivation. In this context, lateral thinking can be used to stimulate

creativity and problem solving. For example, someone struggling with anxiety might turn to lateral thinking to discover unconventional relaxation techniques.

or creative approaches to managing stress. In Anabasis, lateral thinking becomes a valuable tool for innovation and personal growth. People can

Use this approach to explore unconventional opportunities and develop new skills or perspectives. For example, someone looking to advance their career might

use lateral thinking to identify untapped market niches or unique approaches to product development.

Vertical Thinking: Vertical thinking is based on a more linear and logical approach to solving problems and making decisions. Involves detailed analysis, logical sequence of steps

and careful evaluation of available options. In Mesobasis, vertical thinking is used to strategically plan and make fundamental decisions. The people that

Employing top-down thinking, they are able to break down complex problems into manageable components and systematically evaluate the consequences of their actions. Vertical thinking

On the other hand, it plays a fundamental role in Catabasis by helping people to deeply analyze and understand their problems and emotions. During moments of emotional crisis, the

Vertical thinking is used to break down problems into manageable components and address them logically and sequentially. For example, someone facing personal loss

Meaningfully, you can use vertical thinking to reflect on your grief, identify the stages of the grieving process, and seek therapeutic support specific to each stage. He

Vertical thinking, for its part, plays an essential role in Anabasis by allowing strategic planning and orderly progress. During the search for objectives and the

personal growth, vertical thinking is used to set clear goals, develop detailed plans, and systematically evaluate progress. For example, a student who

As you prepare to enter a prestigious university, you can use top-down thinking to create a meticulous study plan and constantly track your performance.

academic.

Vertical Thinking vs. Lateral Thinking: Vertical thinking is a way of approaching situations that is based on following a linear and predefined path. It is like following a set of established rules or guidelines and applying common sense based on current circumstances. However, this can often lead to limited solutions, as the approach is rigid and does not allow for much creativity or flexibility. The analogy of the bird in the cage represents how someone trapped in top-down thinking can feel limited and resigned to their situation, as if their options were limited and his "wings" (his creative and adaptive abilities) were restricted.

Lateral thinking, on the other hand, is much more flexible. Instead of following a predetermined path, look for different directions and approaches to address a problem or issue. situation. The bird analogy shows how lateral thinking can find creative and unexpected solutions. Instead of passively waiting for the door to open the cage (an obvious solution), the bird uses its ingenuity to create new opportunities, such as pushing the cage, attracting attention, or using available items. This illustrates how Lateral thinking can branch out possibilities and overcome obstacles through will, intensity, and concentration rather than simply accepting the current situation.

Semiscension and Shuhari: The concept of Semiscension in Mesobasis is related to the Japanese idea of "Shuhari 守破離", which describes the stages of learning up to mastery. In "Shu", one follows the teachings of a teacher in a strict and disciplined manner. This resembles the period in Mesobasis where one closely follows the "rules" of reality and follows an established structure. In "Ha", the learner frees himself from traditional teachings to begin to incorporate his own ideas and initiatives. This resembles the moment in Mesobasis when we began to question the established "rules" and look for more creative and personalized solutions. Finally, in "Ri", the apprentice has achieved mastery and combines his knowledge and experience to transcend the limitations of traditional teachings. This relates to Mesobasis in the sense that by understanding the dynamics of Catabasis and Anabasis, we can overcome avatarized concepts of these states and find more effective solutions.

Perspective and Differentiation: Perspective is a powerful tool to differentiate between periods of Catabasis and false Anabasis. Sometimes these states can disguise themselves as their opposite variant, which can lead to incorrect decisions or ineffective actions. By observing from invisible angles or identifying blind spots in these periods, we can discern their true nature. This is achieved by applying the right values and the right operations at the right time, which leads to more solving conclusions.

Overcoming Avatarized Concepts: Human beings often express their thoughts and concerns through complaints or complaining, especially during periods of Catabasis or Anabasis. Although these expressions They can be a natural response, learning to live and coexist with these states can help us overcome avatarized concepts. To achieve this, we must pay attention to elements such as telegraph (anticipate), walk (advance), circumvent (overcome obstacles), pivot (change direction), and traverse (overcome challenges). The emphasis is on adapting the intensity and the rhythm of our actions to achieve desired results.

Action Framework: Go no Sen (後の先 – Take the initiative after): In this state, one acts or takes the initiative after another element has already done so. This dynamic can be assimilated to the idea of "Prevention" in Mesobasis. That is, when we perceive that a Catabasic or Anabasic state is already underway, we intervene to prevent its deepening or advancement. This can include measures to prevent a negative state from escalating or a positive state from deviating in an undesirable direction. Sen no Sen (先の先 - Taking the initiative simultaneously): In this state, one acts or takes the initiative at the same time that another element also does so. This can be compared to the "Imitation" in Mesobasis. Instead of waiting for a state to fully develop, one acts simultaneously to influence the direction and outcome. For example, if we perceive that someone is entering a state of Positive Anabasis, we can unite and actively contribute to strengthening that state. Sensen no Sen (先先の先 - Taking the initiative in anticipation of the anticipated): In this state, one acts or takes the initiative anticipating the intention of another element to take a certain action or path. This relates to "Delay" in Mesobasis. Here one is you

signaling and anticipating the intentions of the catabasic or anabasic states to take actions that can influence the desired direction. It's like taking the lead in understanding states and anticipating them.

The Importance of Rhythm and Coordination: In Mesobasis, the Catabasis and Anabasis states can present a chaotic variety of obstacles. Instead of completely immersing ourselves in these states, we must learn to pivot (change direction), avoid (overcome obstacles) and oscillate (balance) between both concepts. This involves adjusting our pace and coordination according to the circumstances to find balance and move forward effectively.

Rest, Rest and Stop: Finally, to achieve an adequate transition between catabasic and anabasic states, we must consider elements such as resting (taking a short break), resting (recovering energy passively) and stop (completely cease movement). These processes are essential to conserve our energy and adapt effectively to Mesobasis.

Intelligence and Ignorance in Mesobasis: Intelligence is the ability to process knowledge, and this knowledge is built from a series of beliefs that converge into demonstrable truths. On the other hand, Ignorance, at its opposite extreme, involves processing ignorance, based on beliefs that lead to lies or fictitious events that cannot be supported by any method or way of demonstration. Both ways of understanding the world seek to justify themselves, even if they sometimes contradict what we really know, either before or after acquiring certain knowledge. In the search for concrete knowledge, various sources are explored, from philosophical perspectives to psychological and epistemological approaches. The intelligence, In this context, it allows our minds to interact with knowledge and apply reason to derive logical conclusions. This reasoning process that leads to knowledge based on causes and principles is known as "Dianoia διάνοια". However, in contrast to intelligence, there is the "Doxa δόξα", which refers to opinion, that is, a set of points of view that are based on elements that lead to a specific conclusion. These elements are often found in the realm of sensitivity, meaning they are more related to perception than to reason. On the other hand, the "Noesis νόησις" is understood as an intellectual activity, the faculty of thinking for itself, and represents the activity intrinsic mental ability to process and understand concrete knowledge. The mind acts as a channel that connects with the "Noosphere νόοςσφαῖρα", a term denoting the sphere of knowledge shared by living beings that make use of intelligence. The interconnection between these living beings is reflected in their constant mental proximity, although it is essential that this proximity be prudent (Phronesis Φρόνησις), since a lack of moderation in this regard, a kind of "excessity" or "Hybris ὕβρις", could trigger undesired consequences. In this perspective, we could understand the Mesobasis as an intermediate state in which the Anabasic elements, such as Phronesis, intelligence, knowledge, the Noosphere and the Noesis, They contribute to enriching understanding and personal growth. These elements promote the development and evolution of the individual by encouraging the acquisition of knowledge and ability to reflect on them. They provide a solid basis for making informed decisions and contribute to the connection between living beings in the search for knowledge. By On the other hand, the Catabasic elements, which include Hubris, ignorance, ignorance, vulgarity and doxa, represent forces that tend to dissolve or weaken this search. of knowledge and understanding. Hubris, in particular, can lead to arrogance and lack of restraint, which can be detrimental to the process of learning and growth. staff. Ignorance and doxa can lead to erroneous conclusions and superficial opinions, hindering the acquisition of deeper knowledge.

Plato and the Two Worlds: In Plato's philosophy, two worlds are distinguished: the sensible world and the intelligible world. The sensible world is accessible through our senses and contains physical objects and their representations, such as shadows and images. However, physical objects are changeable and therefore the knowledge we gain from them is relative and temporal. According to Plato, this world is related to ignorance or non-being, since our perceptions can be confusing and our beliefs, although more precise that images still belong to opinion and do not constitute true knowledge. This notion of two worlds is related to the dynamics of Mesobasis. In the Mesobasis, they address intermediate cognitive and emotional states, and Plato's distinction between the sensible and intelligible world can be understood as a representation of how people can experience and process knowledge. In the sentient world, changing perceptions and beliefs can lead to states of confusion, similar to Catabasis. On the other hand, the intelligible world, where knowledge is more precise and lasting, can represent a state of greater clarity and understanding, close to Anabasis. The dynamics of the Mesobasis fit in this conceptualization because it reflects how our perceptions and beliefs can oscillate between clarity and confusion, depending on various factors. Often, we are in search for knowledge and clarity, but our experiences and environment can throw us into intermediate states where our beliefs are relative and changing.

Free Will and Decision Making: Free will is the belief that people have the ability to make decisions for themselves.

Is more. To make informed decisions, A sufficient level of intelligence is required to allow reasoning about actions and reaching the desired conclusions. This implies that human beings have the power to be "Judge, Jury and Executioner." This means that they can judge elements, express opinions and make decisions, either to defend their own diversity or to rule on elements. that are not directly related to them or their vital proxemia. This decision-making capacity is crucial to deal with the dynamics of Mesobasis, where people They face situations that may require a choice between good and evil, action and inaction, or change and immobility. Morality in Mesobasis becomes especially relevant in the context of free will. The decisions made by people can be influenced by their belief and value system, and these decisions can vary depending on the context and circumstances. Sometimes what may be considered correct in one context may seem incorrect in another, raising questions about relativity. of morality in Mesobasis. However, it is important to note that the exercise of free will may not be as absolute as it might seem. The dynamics of Catabasis and Anabasis, which represent the periods of decline and rise in a person's life, can indirectly influence the decision-making process. During the moments of Catabasis, Where people face challenges, difficulties, or adverse situations, their ability to exercise free will may be limited. The immediate concerns and Tensions can cloud your judgment and lead to impulsive decisions or knee-jerk reactions. On the other hand, in the periods of Anabasis, where people experience growth personal, success, or favorable situations, they are more likely to be able to exercise their free will more fully and thoughtfully. The feeling of well-being and security can give them the confidence necessary to make informed and goal-focused decisions. On the other hand, in periods of Anabasis, where people experience personal growth, success or favorable situations, they are more likely to be able to exercise their free will more fully and thoughtfully. The feeling of well-being and security can give them confidence necessary to make informed and goal-focused decisions.

Proxemic: Proxemics is a concept that refers to the study of how people perceive, use and establish spatial distances in their social and personal interactions. It is a part important non-verbal communication that focuses on how people relate to their physical environment and to others based on distance. In essence, proxemics deals to understand how people regulate their personal and social space in various situations and cultures. This involves the delimitation of zones of space that range from intimate and close even public and distant. These zones vary depending on the cultural, social and personal context, and their observance influences the comfort and level of interaction between people. One of The key concepts in proxemics is the notion of "personal bubble" or "intimate space", which is the closest physical distance a person allows between themselves and others in situations of intimacy or trust. This bubble can vary from culture to culture and person to person, but it is a fundamental aspect in the study of how people interact. They relate and feel comfortable in their surroundings. Proxemia in Mesobasis refers to the separation or distance that an individual maintains in relation to the elements that make up her life and her surroundings. This distance is not limited only to the physical, as in the case of the invasion of personal space, but encompasses the interaction and influence of these. elements in the life of the individual. In this context, proxemia manifests itself in a dynamic and fluctuating way, since it changes according to the decisions and permissions that the individual himself gives to the elements that surround it. Similar to how a person can allow or refuse others to invade their personal space, in Mesobasis, an individual can allow or reject the avatarization of Mesobasic dynamics in her life. For example, an individual may decide to interact with certain elements or people that may lead to negative effects. Catabasics or Anabasics in her life. This interaction can be conscious or unconscious, and the proxemics you establish with respect to these elements will influence the general dynamic. of the Mesobasis of him.

Deserving: Constantly, human beings are faced with the question of what they deserve or do not deserve, and the reasons behind these beliefs. In this process, different dynamics are used, such as rewards and punishments, so

such as opening or closing options. This involves judging what is considered good or bad based on the possible repercussions and consequences, either immediate or in the near future, both for the individual and for the community to which they belong. However, there is another dynamic of socialization that is based on what we could call the "law of profit." In this perspective, human beings value and prioritize what provides immediate or rapid benefits in their environment. Instead of following a strict ethical or moral code, they are guided by simplicity and convenience, seeking to achieve their objectives with minimal effort. This "law of least effort" approach involves that some people help each other not necessarily because they are committed to a specific ethics or morality, but because they see clear advantages in doing so. These benefits They can be personal or they can contribute to the well-being of your community. The Mesobasis is the space in which these decisions are made and executed, and where people balance moral and ethical demands with their immediate needs and desires.

Dynamics of Punishments and Rewards:

Definition: The dynamics of punishments and rewards are social systems that operate as evaluation mechanisms of human actions, considering the consequences that these may have. trigger. In this context, consequences can take two main forms: rewards, which are positive results that encourage certain behaviors, and punishments, which They are negative results that deter or sanction unwanted behaviors.

Additional Explanation: These dynamics are essential in the structuring of society and the formation of shared norms and values. People, in their daily interactions, take decisions based on the anticipation of possible rewards or punishments that may arise as a result of their actions. This constant weighting is related to the concept of Mesobasis, which represents an intermediate state where considerations of restriction (Catabasis) and expansion (Anabasis) are balanced in decision making. In the Mesobasis, the People seek that balance between considering restrictions and opportunities, reflecting the need to adapt to the complexities of daily life and relationships. social. The ability to evaluate and manage these punishment and reward dynamics is essential to navigating the ethical and moral complexities of human life.

The Law of Profit and Minimum Effort:

Definition: The "law of profit" refers to the tendency of some people to prioritize actions that generate immediate benefits or personal advantages, even if this means avoiding additional efforts or not considering long-term consequences. In other words, it involves making decisions based on self-interest or comfort, without giving careful attention. appropriate to long-term outcomes or broader ethical considerations. When people follow the "law of profit" and seek immediate advantages, they are often less willing to invest time and effort in decisions that might require personal sacrifices or a deeper commitment to ethical principles. This can lead to impulsive actions or decisions that, while they may generate benefits in the short term, are not sustainable in the long term or may have negative consequences for others or the community at large.

Additional Explanation: This approach relates to seeking an easier or more convenient path rather than fully committing to a set of ethical or moral values. Here, Mesobasis manifests as people balance their pursuit of benefits with consideration of the restrictions and expansions that may arise from their actions. This approach reflects how people can find themselves in an intermediate state between restriction (Catabasis) and expansion (Anabasis). Although they seek immediate personal benefits, They are still subject to ethical and moral considerations that can restrain their actions or generate internal conflicts. Ultimately, this balance between self-benefit and ethical responsibilities is an example of how Mesobasis plays a fundamental role in human decision making.

Dual Morality and the Allegory of the Cannibal:

Definition: Dual morality refers to the coexistence of contrasting value systems in an individual or a society. The allegory of the cannibal is a narrative that illustrates a conflict morality in which an individual's actions are viewed differently in two different contexts.

Additional Explanation: Dual morality manifests itself when an individual or a society holds two sets of contradictory values. The allegory of the cannibal exemplifies this concept by presenting a cannibal who has lived his entire life

a in a society where cannibalism is the norm. However, when this cannibal travels to a modern society and practices cannibalism, He is arrested and put on trial. This story highlights how moral standards can vary depending on culture and environment.

Destiny and Free Will:

Definition: Fate is the belief that events or actions are predetermined by a specific force or element, which limits free will. Some people They cling to this idea to avoid responsibility for their actions and find purpose in unexplained events.

Additional Explanation: Those who believe in destiny tend to accept events and consequences as inevitable and beyond their control. This can lead to an attitude of surrender to the events and causalities of life, without resistance or attempts to influence them. This perspective contrasts with the concept of free will, where people have the ability to make decisions and affect one's own destiny. The Mesobasis may include those who hesitate between these two perspectives, trying to balance the influence of fate and destiny. free will in their lives through the Catabasis and Anabasis.

Anabasic and Catabasic Substitutes:

Definition: Anabasic and Catabasic substitutes refer to the search for experiences or states similar to expansion (Anabasis) or restriction (Catabasis), depending on the individual needs. These can have various reasons and objectives.

Additional Explanation: In human society, people often seek experiences or states that generate feelings of expansion or restriction, depending on what they need at a moment. given. The motives behind this quest can vary widely, and individuals may opt for Anabasis to gain a sense of freedom and growth or Catabasis to find security and stability. These states reflect the capacity for adaptation and choice of people in the Mesobasis, where they seek to balance their changing needs and desires.

Law of Equivalence and Impact on Identity:

Explanation: People often believe that by judging or applying negative consequences to others for their actions, they can significantly change those people's behavior and, therefore, improving the dynamics of your lifestyle or living pattern. However, in Mesobasis, it is recognized that what happens to one individual does not necessarily affect others. the same way. This is summarized in the expression "What happens to me will not change who you are, because to do so you must allow the change." The law of equivalence states that elements of equal value cancel each other out and that disparate interactions are required to generate significant change and overcome stagnation.

Additional Explanation: In Mesobasis, people understand that change and personal evolution are individual processes that require the will and disposition of each individual. Therefore, imposing punishments or consequences on others may not be effective in changing their essence or identity. Instead, people can focus on their own growth personal and in positively influencing their environment in a constructive way, recognizing that each individual has their own Anabasis and Catabasis journey, and that real change depends on the personal will. The law of equivalence suggests that when two elements have the same value, their influence cancels each other out, meaning that to achieve real change, the Interactions must be different enough to overcome resistance and stagnation. This highlights the importance of diversity and variability in decision making. decisions and human interaction.

The Influence of Anabasis and Catabasis on the Perception of Morals:

Explanation: The perception of what is right or wrong in human society is strongly influenced by the states of Anabasis and Catabasis. People tend to evaluate actions and ethical decisions based on how they affect their sense of expansion or restriction. When an action leads to a state of Anabasis, it tends to be considered "good", while that actions that cause a state of Catabasis are perceived as "bad." This influence of expansion and restriction on the perception of morality is a key component of Mesobasis.

Additional Explanation: Mesobasis recognizes that morality is not an absolute matter, but is subject to the influence of human experiences and emotions. The people are more likely to consider actions that give them a sense of growth, freedom, and Anabasis as morally right, and to condemn actions that make them feel restricted, oppression or Catabasis. This understanding of how emotional states influence the perception of morality is critical to navigating the ethical dilemmas in Mesobasis.

Mesobasic Point of View: Point of view, broadly speaking, refers to the perspective, opinion, or attitude that an individual adopts with respect to a topic, person, object, or entity. Is a subjective representation based on the subject's own inclinations, and this perspective can vary widely between different individuals. Points of view are formed based on of what is perceived as true or real, and truth is made up of elements that can be demonstrated and that coincide with an accepted definition. In contrast, the lie is composed of demonstrable elements that do not coincide with an accepted definition. Our views are also influenced by our feelings and emotions towards something, whether pleasant or unpleasant, sacred or profane, philanthropic or misanthropic. In Mesobasis, both Catabasis and Anabasis can influence our perspectives, predisposing our attitudes and decisions through cognitive biases, manias, obsessions or fixations, reinforcing or disrupting them. Each individual constructs his or her own set of beliefs and opinions that shape the way they interpret reality. Truth, on the other hand, refers to the correspondence of a statement or statement with objective reality and verifiable. In essence, truth is a set of facts or components that can be demonstrated to be accurate and that conform to an accepted definition or standard. The truth It is the opposite of lying, which involves the presentation of false or misleading information that does not match reality. In the search for truth, people look for evidence and solid evidence to support your claims and beliefs, which involves a process of discernment and critical analysis.

Knowledge, in its essence, can be compared to a liquid poured into different containers, representing the diversity of perspectives and approaches that individuals can have. These vessels symbolize the different origins and frames of reference that influence the way a person processes and understands knowledge. Conflict arises when someone defends his own "vessel" or perspective as superior to others, which can lead to debates and disagreements in the search for truth. The interaction between these "containers" and Its content is essential to reach meaningful conclusions. Conclusions, ultimately, represent the end point of a process of thinking, reasoning or argumentation. However, the variety of perspectives and the influence of biases may affect the nature of these conclusions. Biases can distort the decision-making process. decisions and lead to conclusions that are biased toward one extreme or biased in some way. The points of view can be real or unreal, the former coming from a native reality or an original point of view that functions as the source of that point, and the second comes from the change through the filter of the individual's experience itself, which bastardizes its nature in a certain way to achieve or determine an end in a specific way. The metaphor of the omnidirectionally branching tree is a powerful image that represents the diversity of perspectives and approaches in the pursuit of knowledge and understanding. Imagine a majestic tree with innumerable branches spreading in all directions. directions, without a predefined pattern, growing freely in search of sunlight. This image symbolizes the multiplicity of ways in which people approach knowledge and how each perspective is unique and valuable in its own right. All branches of the tree, although they develop differently and have distinctive bumps and curvatures, are equally legitimate. There is no branch that is inherently better or worse than another. Instead, each branch represents the uniqueness of an individual's experience and perspective. These differences can arise from various factors, such as cultural background, education, life experiences, and personal beliefs. The key to this metaphor lies in understanding that diversity of perspectives enriches our understanding of the world and enriches the process of seeking knowledge. Each branch of the tree seeks its own source of light and, so Similarly, each individual seeks his or her own truth and understanding. It is not about comparing which branch is superior or inferior, but about recognizing and appreciating the differences and learning from them.

The Mesobasis itself can be seen in this simple way: A geometric object with different faces, being illuminated from different angles simultaneously. This casts a shadow, and Thanks to the way the geometric figure is exposed to the light sources, according to its angle of origin, that is the shadow that is projected. Mesobasis can be taken

like this multifacial geometric object, where different shadows are projected and different conclusions are reached, and although the points of view are different, they all come from the same point fountain. Perspective is the way of representing one or more objects on a flat surface, which gives an idea of the position, volume and situation they occupy in space with respect to the environment. eye of the observer. Therefore, when Mesobasis produces lights and shadows through Catabasis and Anabasis, making us reach conclusions through various points of view, It can be said that it indirectly influences our perspective. The way we approach situations are, in origin, points of view that help us understand the different shadows cast on the situation. Let's imagine that the light that is focused on a situation is the cause, and the shadow is the effect, then the situation is the multifaceted geometric object. No matter how many faces you have, if you only focus on one and ignore the rest of the faces coming from the source, the point of view will only be able to partially understand the situation. Just as the problems come from the Catabasis, and the solutions come from the Anabasis, the methods of resolution and intersection from one state to another are coming from Mesobasis itself, the environment where Catabasis and Anabasis function. Each action creates a reaction, which generates an impact, and in Mesobasis we can understand this such as our actions or the Catabasic or Anabasic actions, the reactions of the elements interacted with these concepts and the repercussions reflected both in the individuals, as in the concepts themselves, just like a drop of water falling into a body of water, generating various waves of various sizes.

The Mesobasis resembles an intricate geometric object, a complex entity composed of multiple facets, elements and characteristics. In its structure, we can identify a diversity of components such as faces, edges, vertices, angles, apothems, radii, centers, diagonals, sides, diameters, bases, guidelines, foci, axes, shapes, patterns, projections planar or multiplanar, as well as geometric relationships such as parallel, oblique, perpendicular, arcs, curves, continuous, discontinuous, horizontal, vertical, sagittal, frontal, transversal, and many others. This complexity illustrates that the Mesobasis is composed of a variety of elements that make it intrinsically indeterminate in its entirety, although Catabasis and Anabasis, which are its fundamental components, provide a degree of relative determination. To understand Mesobasis in its entirety, it is necessary to approach it in a systematically, breaking it down into parts, segments and areas. We must take a puzzle-solving approach, where each piece gradually brings us closer to a deeper understanding. of this complex concept. We should not be content with conclusions that quickly fit our pre-existing logic, as biases and perspectives can lead us to erroneous or limited interpretations of Mesobasis. Instead, we must adopt a perspective that allows us to break down the Mesobasis into more manageable segments and understand it in its whole over time, as if we were watching a movie made up of a sequence of frames. This will allow us to approach Mesobasis in a more comprehensive way. and precise. Its inert nature tells us that the Mesobasis has a number of bodies and avatarizations through the Catabasis and Anabasis, at the moment, completely incalculable, but approximately they are enough to define Mesobasis itself as indeterminant, while Catabasis and Anabasis are a little closer to determination. The Mesobasis casts shadows by means of lights through the Catabasis and the Anabasis, leading to various conclusions and perspectives. Perspectives, in essence, are the way in which we represent situations and objects on a flat surface, giving us information about their position and volume in relation to the observer. Mesobasis indirectly influences in our perspectives, since the shadows projected by lights represent our actions and reactions to different elements and concepts. This constant interaction generates a variety of repercussions on individuals and on the concepts themselves.

In fact, Mesobasis itself is likely to function like a Koch Snowflake, where its inert and mechanical nature never ceases, therefore its fractal nature leads to the Catabasis and Anabasis are presented on scales of different sizes and dimensions of the same nature, with the values increased or decreased according to the scale on which they are manifested. These scales are territories where the influence of these concepts varies.

values, depending again on the perspective as such. The Mesobasis does not have a self-consciousness, nor a perspective on its own mechanism, which is why its functioning manifests itself in different ways, and many of them unattainable to limit, measure or contain. It is practically a mandala that expands infinitely, and in those infinities, reaches transfinite figures, thus up to indetermination. The closest thing to being able to establish delimitations with respect to to the Catabasis, Anabasis and the Mesobasis are through effigies of their own origin, elements such as time, space, matter, energy, and much simpler concepts of the vastness of the Mesobasic mechanism. Therefore, to understand how the Mesobasis mechanism acts and functions, a mechanism of infinite gears must be portrayed in a circumference of such vast proportions that we can only visualize a part of it, while it covers the entirety of our vision. Each inert gear works as a tiny representation of the current Mesobasis, and each movement that it produces or occurs in it is what leads it to connect with other gears, transferring the movement, causing actions, which trigger reactions, and which generate repercussions in a totally constant and indisputable way.

Eudemonia and Cacodemonia: In ancient Greek mythology, there were two concepts that we modernly know as "the angel and the demon of the shoulder": Eudaemonius and Cacodemonium. The first represented an entity benevolent, while the second was an evil entity. The word eudáimōn in Greek denotes having a helping spirit and therefore being happy. This word is composed of εὖ (eu), meaning "good" or "good", and δαίμων (dáimōn), meaning "divinity, spirit, divine power, destiny or god". It is interesting to note that the word "daimon" is also related to the Greek term for "demon." In this case, "demon" would be understood as "full of knowledge." On the other hand, a cacodemon, cacodemon or cacodaemon is an evil spirit or, in a modern sense, a demon. The opposite of a cacodemon is an agathodaemon or eudaemon, a benign spirit or angel. The word "cacodemon" comes from Latin and is derived from Greek ancient κακοδαίμων (kakodaimōn), meaning "evil spirit", where "daimon" would be understood as a neutral spirit in Classical Greece and "Tychodaimon" would be a benevolent spirit. These concepts can be understood not so much as individual entities, but as representations of Catabasis (descent) and Anabasis (ascent), concepts that gave rise to several religious conceptions and interpretations. In their essence, Eudaemonia and Cacodemonia represent "Beneficial Knowledge" and "Malefic Knowledge", respectively, related with Catabasis and Anabasis. Additionally, there are synonyms for these names. In the case of the Eudaemonio, it is known as Agathodemon, Guardian Angels or intermediary guardians between the gods (other avatarizations of Catabasis and Anabasis) and human beings. On the other hand, Cacodemons have synonyms such as Fallen Angel, Demon (just) or evil spirits. These concepts can not only be applied to the avatarizations of Catabasis and Anabasis, but also to frequent creatures that are mostly related to these concepts. While on the one hand the Eudemon remembers the virtues and is intrinsically an avatarization of the Anabasis, the Cacodemon remembers the vices and is intrinsically an avatarization of the Catabasis. From them are born the following dualities: Faith and Idolatry, Hope and Despair, Charity and Avarice, Chastity and Lust, Prudence and Folly, Patience and Anger, Sweetness and Hardness, Concord and Discord, Obedience and Rebellion, Perseverance and Inconsistency, Humility and Pride, Generosity and Avarice, Chastity and Lust, Patience and Anger, Temperance and Gluttony, Charity and Envy, Diligence and Laziness. These dualities have been represented throughout history, especially in the Middle Ages, through allegories such as "Psychomachia" or "Battle of the soul", where abstract human virtues fight against personified vices. This conflict is represented in epic poems such as that of Aurelio Prudentius in the 5th century, the Medieval "Roman de la rose" and John Bunyan's "Pilgrim's Progress" in 1678. These examples illustrate how the periods of Catabasis and Anabasis, as well as their native elements of these concepts have caused in human beings a constant oscillation between positive and negative values, between successes and failures, their lights and shadows, gradually forming eclipses where strangely they have been able, with brevity, to understand what they are and what they are like, although like the astronomical event, these types of events occur with a relatively low frequency.

In the realm of mystical and esoteric approaches, Eudaemonius and Cacodemonium acquire even deeper and more symbolic meanings. These interpretations are explored in greater detail here:

Eudaemonium as a symbol of the "higher self": In these currents of thought, Eudaemonium is considered a symbol of the "higher self" or the highest and most spiritual part of the person. This "Higher self" represents the connection with divinity, inner wisdom and higher consciousness. It is the part of us that seeks spiritual evolution, enlightenment and elevation of consciousness. Eudaemonium is also associated with intelligence on the "Buddhist plane", meaning that it is related to deep knowledge and understanding of spiritual truths.

Higher esoteric planes: In esoteric spirituality, it is believed in the existence of higher planes or dimensions of reality that are beyond everyday perception. Eudaemonium is considered an entity or energy that resides in these higher planes and that assists in the spiritual evolution of individuals. It is attributed the ability to elevate thoughts and emotions towards higher states of consciousness and spiritual understanding.

Cacodemon and Negative Entities: In contrast, Cacodemon is defined as negative creatures and entities that represent the antithesis of the "higher self."

These entities may include egregores (collective psychic constructs), archons (evil archon beings in certain esoteric cosmologies), boggarts (mischievous or malevolent spirits of Celtic mythology), tulpas (beings created by the power of thought), wandering spirits (lost souls or aimless entities), discarnates (disembodied spirits), astral larvae (negative entities that feed energy), among others.

The "lower self" and involution: Cacodemonia seeks the imposition of the "lower self", which represents the darkest and most negative parts of the human psyche. These negative entities can be related to concepts such as the "Klesa" of Dukkha, which are the mental and emotional afflictions that cause suffering and impede spiritual progress in philosophy buddhist. They are also associated with icy or fiery Narakas, which are concepts in some spiritual traditions that represent states of extreme suffering or hells.

Klesha (Klesa): The "Klesha" or "Klesa" are fundamental concepts in Buddhist philosophy that refer to mental, emotional and spiritual afflictions that cause suffering and They hinder spiritual progress. These afflictions are considered obstacles on the path to enlightenment and liberation from the cycle of suffering, which is one of the main objectives of Buddhism. In Buddhism, they are believed to be the primary cause of the cycle of suffering (Samsara) by keeping humans trapped in the wheel of rebirth. There are many "Klesha" common, and are traditionally described as the following:

Desire (Raga): This affliction refers to insatiable desire and greed for sense gratification and possession of material goods. Desire is considered a source of suffering because it creates attachments and longings that can never be fully satisfied.

Aversion (Dvesha): Aversion encompasses feelings of hatred, anger, rejection and aversion towards people, situations or things that we do not like. This affliction can lead to conflicts and emotional suffering.

Ignorance (Avidya): Ignorance refers to the lack of understanding of the true nature of reality. It is the root of all other afflictions and the cycle of suffering. Enlightenment is sought through overcoming ignorance.

Pride (Māna): Excessive pride or arrogance leads to an exaggerated view of oneself, which results in comparing oneself favorably with others. This can create conflict and distance between people.

Jealousy (Irshya): Jealousy arises when one feels envy or resentment towards the achievements or possessions of others. This can generate suffering and rivalries.

Burning and Icy Narakas: In Buddhism, it is believed in the existence of various states of existence after death, which are determined by actions and afflictions accumulated during life. "Narakas" are states of extreme suffering that are often translated as "hells." There are different types of "Narakas", including "Fiery Narakas" and the "Frozen Narakas":

Burning Narakas (Naraka): These are infernal states characterized by extreme suffering due to heat and fire. It is believed that souls who have committed extremely bad or who have accumulated a large amount of "Klesha" can be reborn in these states. Suffering in the "Burning Narakas" includes the sensation of intense burning and torment related to heat. Its deepest level is Avici.

Frozen Narakas (Niraya): These are hellish states characterized by extreme suffering due to cold and freezing. Souls who have committed especially vile acts and have accumulated a large amount of negativity can be reborn in these states. Suffering in the "Frozen Narakas" involves feeling intense cold and ice-related torment. His deepest level is Mahapadma.

Relationship with the Cacodemon: The Klesas can be related to the concept of Cacodemon in the sense that they represent internal or negative forces that can lead to actions harmful or destructive. Just as Cacodemons are evil spirits in Greek mythology, Klesas can be considered "inner demons" that hinder growth. spiritual. The Narakas relate to the concept of Cacodemon in the sense that both are associated with negative experiences and suffering. The Narakas are places of punishment, while Cacodemons are evil entities that can cause harm. In Mesobasis, Cacodemons are probably the category to which any entity of negative or highly harmful nature, incapable of establishing a real coexistence with other living beings or with an Anabasis, since the word Cacodemonia represents the "Malefic Knowledge", and therefore, all being with sufficient

e consciousness enough to know and have this negative knowledge to use in its favor and against others. other types of life.

Lightning: "Enlightenment" in the context of beliefs and philosophies is a term that encompasses a variety of meanings and concepts in different religious, philosophical and cultural traditions. spiritual.

Enlightenment in Philosophy and Religion:

Buddhism: In Buddhism, "Enlightenment" refers to achieving a state of wisdom and deep understanding of the nature of reality and the elimination of human suffering. HE primarily associated with the historical Buddha, Siddhartha Gautama, who achieved Enlightenment under the Bodhi tree and became the Buddha. In this context, Enlightenment implies the overcoming illusions and realizing the ultimate truth.

Hinduism: In Hinduism, Enlightenment is related to the concept of "Moksha" or liberation from the cycle of reincarnation (samsara). It involves the realization of unity with Brahman (ultimate reality) and overcoming ego and worldly limitations. Enlightenment is achieved through yoga, meditation and self-reflection.

Christianity: In the Christian tradition, Enlightenment refers to the experience of a deep, spiritual understanding of faith and relationship with God. It can manifest as a divine revelation, an epiphany or spiritual transformation that leads to a closer relationship with God.

Enlightenment in Western Philosophy:

Enlightenment: In the context of the 18th century European Enlightenment, the "Enlightenment" refers to an intellectual movement that promoted reason, science, and the emancipation of the human thought of religious and monarchical authority. Enlightenment philosophers such as Voltaire, Rousseau, and Kant advocated freedom, equality, and the pursuit of knowledge.

Enlightenment in Modern Spirituality:

New Age and Modern Spirituality: In the realm of contemporary spirituality, "Enlightenment" is often associated with mystical experiences, the expansion of consciousness and the search of the inner truth. Various techniques are practiced, such as meditation, yoga and the exploration of consciousness, with the aim of achieving states of Enlightenment or spiritual awakening.

Enlightenment in the Philosophy of Enlightenment: In philosophy, especially in the work of Immanuel Kant, "Enlightenment" refers to the emancipation of humanity through use of reason and overcoming minority, which is the inability to think for oneself without the guidance of others. Kant called this era "the age of Enlightenment."

Catharism: Catharism, also known as the Cathar or Albigensian movement, was a religious and spiritual movement that flourished in Western Europe, particularly in southern France, during the 12th and 13th centuries. Catharism had some connections with the notion of Enlightenment, although with some significant differences. Here are some of the key characteristics of Catharism in relation to Enlightenment:

Dualism: Catharism was a form of religious dualism. The Cathars believed in the existence of two supreme and opposite principles: the God of Good and the God of Evil. They considered that the material world and the flesh were creations of the God of Evil, while the spiritual world and the search for truth were associated with the God of Good. This duality often It resembles the dualism present in the Eastern Enlightenment and the struggle between light and darkness.

Rejection of the Material World: The Cathars shared a distrust of the material world and considered that spiritual liberation was achieved through asceticism, renunciation to worldly pleasures and the return to the spiritual world. This vision shared certain parallels with the idea that Enlightenment is achieved through the transcendence of the world. material and the search for a deeper spiritual reality.

Search for Spiritual Perfection: The Cathars sought spiritual perfection and strove to live ascetic and morally pure lives. Spiritual purification was a central objective in their belief, which is an aspect that relates to the search for spiritual Enlightenment and the elevation of consciousness in many spiritual traditions.

Belief in Reincarnation: Some Cathar groups held a belief in reincarnation, which implied that the human soul went through cycles of birth and rebirth until achieve final liberation. This belief in reincarnation resembles the idea of spiritual evolution and the development of consciousness found in some traditions of Lightning.

Relationship with Enlightenment: Enlightenment is a state of higher consciousness and deep spiritual understanding. It is related to the search for truth, inner peace

and the spiritual elevation. In this context, the Eudaemonium can be considered as an external or symbolic representation of the spiritual fulfillment and happiness that are achieved through of Enlightenment. In Mesobasis, Eudaemons are probably the category to which any entity of a positive or highly healing nature, capable of establishing a real coexistence with other living beings or with overcoming and learning from a Catabasis, since the word Eudemonia represents "Beneficial Knowledge", and therefore, every being with sufficient consciousness to know and have this positive knowledge to use in your favor and in favor of other types of life.

Throughout history, humans have used different approaches, such as religions, philosophies, psychology and lifestyles, to understand and simplify the concepts of Eudemonia and Cacodemonia. These concepts have been categorized more rigidly to facilitate their understanding. They are not entities in themselves, but rather categories of entities that employ knowledge, whether benevolent or evil, with a positive or negative purpose, broadly speaking. Eudemonia is associated with those figures or concepts that represent the good, the progress and improvement in human life. Examples of Eudaemons include heroes, saviors, and people who have contributed significantly to the advancement of humanity. These figures are often revered and celebrated in various cultures and mythologies as examples of virtue and goodness. Cacodemon, on the other hand, refers to entities or concepts that embody evil, destruction or stagnation. Examples of Cacodemons can be criminals, sectarian leaders, and people who have hindered human progress or caused harm. These figures They are often vilified and considered sources of suffering and evil. This duality between Eudaemonia and Cacodemonia has been reflected in countless mythologies, cultural traditions and stories throughout history. These categorizations help people understand and address the complexity of human actions and the forces that influence the world. TO Through these concepts, societies have sought to better understand the nature of human actions and how they contribute to the progress or decline of humanity. The struggle between these two categories has been a fundamental part of humanity's cultural and spiritual narrative, serving as a tool to examine values, choices morals and the path towards personal and collective fulfillment.

Panoptes Digital - The Omniscient and Omnipresent Machine: "Digital Panoptes", by its translation, "Digitization of All Eyes", refers to an entity or digital surveillance system that shares conceptual similarities with the figure mythology of Argos Panoptes and Bentham's concept of the "Panopticon." Argos Panoptes, in Greek mythology, was a being with numerous eyes that represented omnipresence and omniscience. The Bentham Panopticon is a surveillance structure designed so that a single guard can observe all the prisoners without being seen. In the digital context, this could be interpreted as a surveillance or control system that monitors everything online without being detected.

Human Lyre: The "Human Lyre" refers to the strategy that Hermes used to defeat Argos Panoptes in Greek mythology. Hermes deceived Argos by disguising himself as a shepherd and then he lulled him to sleep with stories and songs. In this context, the "Human Lyre" represents cunning and subtlety in the way you approach the challenge of defeating the Digital Panoptes. Instead To confront him forcefully, the idea is proposed of stunning him, lulling him, or deceiving him to avoid his ability to constantly observe him.

Strategies to defeat Argos Panoptes Digital: Several strategies are proposed to defeat Argos Panoptes Digital. These strategies are influenced by the myth of Hermes and Argos:

Create a Digital Lyre of Hermes: This could be translated as using some type of electronic interference or electromagnetic chanting to distract or confuse the Panoptes' surveillance. Digital, similar to how Hermes distracted Argos with stories and songs.

"Deceiving the appearance of him in the direct vision of Argos": Hermes managed to deceive the perception of Argos by disguising himself as a shepherd and hiding his true identity from him. Instead of facing directly into the watchful gaze of Argos, Hermes chose to adopt an appearance that would not raise suspicion or arouse alarm. This tactic involved deceiving Argos' senses. to avoid constant surveillance of him.

"Skill is better than strength": This expression means that cunning and intelligence are more effective than brute force in certain situations. In the myth, Hermes did not attempt to defeat Argos with violence, but instead he opted for a more ingenious and less confrontational strategy. Once Hermes posed as a shepherd, he used stories and music to calm and lull people to sleep. Argus. This had the effect of relaxing Argos, putting him in a sort of mental "comfort zone" and making him less alert and vigilant. After having lulled Argus with his cunning, Hermes was able to act quickly and undetected to decisively assassinate Argos. This action was carried out in a solemn and effective manner, without giving Argos the opportunity to react or recover from the drowsy state of it.

Destruction of all eyes simultaneously: This strategy involves disabling all Panoptes Digital surveillance systems at the same time, using a tool equivalent to the "Sword of Hermes" of Greek myth. This could be interpreted as finding a weakness in the system and attacking it in a coordinated manner.

Timing and blind spot: It is suggested to take advantage of the moment when the Panoptes Digital flashes, that is, when it is momentarily blind or cannot monitor all areas simultaneously. This allows you to carry out actions without being detected, avoiding your constant gaze and your ability to foresee events.

Stun it so that it cannot distinguish what is happening: This strategy consists of confusing the Panoptes Digital in such a way that it cannot distinguish or understand what is happening, which would decrease its effectiveness as a surveillance system, overwhelming it sensorially.

Omnipotence, Omniscience and Omnipresence: These are divine attributes that represent unlimited power, all knowledge and presence everywhere. However, in the context of Panoptes Digital proposes that these attributes are intrinsically related to the numerical, which means that they are based on a certain quantity or multiplicity.

Numerical nullification or affectation: It is suggested that if the numerical or mathematical part of these attributes is nullified, counteracted or affected in some way, then omnipotence is turns omnipresence into impotence, into absence, and omniscience into nescience. In other words, they would lose their divine nature and become ineffective.

Argos Panoptes in the digital age: In this context, Argos Panoptes is associated with the digital age and is described as having millions of eyes and limbs, but only one main body. This implies that although it may have many "ends" or "limbs", they are all connected to a single central body that represents its main entity.

Strategy to beat Argos Panoptes Digital: The proposed strategy is that the "Lyre of Hermes" (a

in reference to the cunning of Hermes) must attack the main body of the Digital Argos to achieve victory. To do so, both the body and mind of the Argos must be found and understood, then acted upon to completely disable its digital presence.

Catabasis and Anabasis in the Digital Panoptes: These two concepts refer to forces opposed to each other in reality. Catabasis represents a descent or involution, while Anabasis represents a promotion or evolution. But not only are they abstract concepts, they could also be embodied by entities or creatures. These entities would influence life of human beings and other beings, propelling them towards involution or evolution according to their purposes.

The Mesobasis as a "Machine" of Reality: The idea is raised that the Mesobasis could be a kind of underlying entity in reality, comparable to a machine or program. This Entity, in theory, would establish all elements and events in reality as part of a larger experiment or purpose. However, this purpose is not clearly defined for now.

Influence of Catabasic and Anabasic Entities: It is suggested that these entities cannot directly affect humans or other beings, but they can influence them in ways hint. They could manipulate events or elements close to individuals to achieve their goals, which are apparently related to involution or evolution.

Panoptic Perspective of the Mesobasis: The Mesobasis is described as an entity that has a panoptic perspective, meaning that it can observe everything that happens at all times. It records not only the present, but also the past and future, suggesting complete knowledge of reality. This idea proposes that reality is the result of an experiment or program carried out by Catabasic and Anabasic entities, with the Mesobasis as the underlying entity that observes and records everything.

Strange Configurations: Examples are mentioned of phenomena and places on Earth that have long baffled humanity, such as cryptozoology (the study of animals unknown or legendary creatures), the fel vortices (regions with anomalous behavior), the Zone of Silence (an area where radio and communications signals are unusually weak or absent), the Bermuda Triangle (a region where numerous mysterious disappearances of ships and planes have occurred), ooparts (objects out of place and time) and others unsolved mysteries. As they cannot be determined as Catabasics or Anabasics at the moment, they remain in a state of Mesobasis (since this is also considered a non-scenario). not only inert, but indifferent and intermediate, neutral and oblivious to everything.)

Faults Between Catabasis and Anabasis: It is suggested that these phenomena and mysteries are "flaws" in the interaction between Catabasis and Anabasis. In other words, they could be the result of imbalances or conflicts between the forces of involution and evolution in reality. This leads to the appearance of what are described as "glitches" or "bugs" in the simulated reality. The reasons for these Mesobasic imbalances are unknown, however, it is likely that they are the point of origin of strange events, anomalous situations or phenomena. without a sustainable explanation at the moment.

Cogito, ergo sum (I think, therefore I am): This is one of the most famous concepts of René Descartes, a 17th century philosopher and mathematician. Descartes was interested in finding a secure foundation for knowledge and certainty. To do so, he embarked on a process of radical doubt in which he questioned everything that could be doubtful. He came to the conclusion that Even if he doubted everything, he could not doubt the very act of doubting, which means that he was thinking. Therefore, he concluded that the thought was undoubtable and that, because it was thinking, existed. This statement is summarized in the phrase "Cogito, ergo sum" or "I think, therefore I am."

Matrix in Mesobasis: The Uneasy Feeling: Morpheus tells Neo that there is something in the world that is not working correctly, something that is causing an uneasy feeling in his mind. This feeling of Restlessness is the first step in questioning reality as we know it. Many times in our lives, we can experience moments when something doesn't fit, which leads us to ask ourselves if there is more than what we see. Morpheus detects a fault between the strange imbalance of the artificial world and the real one.

The Matrix Metaphor: Morpheus presents the idea that we live in a simulation called the "Matrix." This metaphor suggests that the reality we experience, with all its limitations and rules, it could be an artificial construct designed to hide the truth. Matrix can be understood as a Mesobasic architecture for

ra a specific goal, emulating the effects of Catabasis and Anabasis, Catabasis being a more predominant point than the other.

Prison for the Mind: Morpheus describes the Matrix as a prison for the mind. This goes beyond physical limitations and refers to the idea that our perceptions and beliefs They are being controlled or manipulated by an external force. This is a powerful metaphor to express how people can be trapped in belief systems or realities. built by others. Once again it transports us to the point where Mesobasis can generate in us biases, manias, adulterated points of view or other types of notions.

The Choice of Pills: The choice between the blue pill and the red pill represents a crucial moment in the film. The blue pill symbolizes the choice to remain in the ignorance, to continue living a life that, although illusory, is comfortable and familiar. On the other hand, the red pill symbolizes the desire to seek the truth, even if it means face a terrifying and unknown reality. Morpheus' choice of Neo is similar to Plato's invitation to leave the cave, and in Mesobasis, there are also Catabasis. who disguise themselves as Anabasis and vice versa.

The Search for Truth: Morpheus emphasizes that the only thing he offers is the truth. This is a central theme in the film and in the exploration of the concept of living in a simulation. Look for The truth, even if uncomfortable or challenging, is a call to self-awareness and questioning reality. Both Catabasis and Anabasis can give light traces of what that can be interpreted as truth, or true, but there is no single version of the truth or a single form of common sense, there are as many nuances as individuals and situations achieve. interact with each other.

Glitches and Bugs: In the analogy of reality as a simulation, glitches and bugs are similar to anomalies or errors that can occur in a computer program. These are strange or inexplicable events that defy natural laws or normal expectations of reality. They may include paranormal phenomena (Frequent Entities), experiences mysterious (failures between the Catabasis and Anabasis due to their imbalanced oscillations) or even unusual coincidences that do not seem to have a logical explanation (parts or elements that may belong or remain in the Mesobasis until their true nature is determined, being so far something that is not close to the Catabasis or Anabasis. This series of elements that do not belong to those states are known as "Limbic Elements", Limbo being understood as the vestibule or anteroom to other states, such as Purgatory, or Bardo.

Simulated Reality: The idea of a simulated reality suggests that what we perceive as the real world could be an artificial construct or controlled by a higher entity. This It raises questions about the true nature of existence and whether our lives are being influenced or manipulated in some way. As such, the fact that the Mesobasis can Giving rise to a simulated reality, a matrix where, on a smaller scale, its elements are more understandable is a probability.

Negative Priming and Positive Priming: These terms refer to how information and media can influence our perceptions. The negative primacy is related with repeated exposure to negative information, which can affect our worldview and make us more pessimistic. On the other hand, positive primacy refers to the presentation of positive information that can influence a more optimistic perception. Both primates can shape our beliefs and attitudes. The negative primacy is intrinsically related with Catabasis and Cacodemonia, and the positive primacy is intrinsically related to Anabasis and Eudaimonia.

Multimedia Content and Reading Between the Lines: In the digital and information age, we are constantly exposed to a large amount of multimedia content, from news to entertainment. This content often carries hidden messages or subtext that can influence our understanding and opinion on various topics. The ability to "read between the lines" It involves being critical and analytical about the information we consume to discover possible agendas or hidden messages. At times, Catabasis and Anabasis can reveal a series of turning points in our lives through slight signals, coincidences, synchronicities, apophenias, hieroanias, pareidolias and other types of similar elements.

Mesobasic Nature: The reference to "Mesobasic nature" relates to the idea that there are unexplained events or unknown phenomena in the world that we do not yet understand. completely. These events may seem like glitches in reality.

ad or errors in the simulation due to our lack of knowledge. Those elements of Mesobasic nature, or Known as "Limbic Elements" are those that do not coincide either in the order of Catabasis or in the order of Anabasis, and although they present concepts of both, they cannot be totally related to some of these ideas, so it remains in the middle, being of a still indeterminate, undifferentiated, variable and potentially unknown. Mesobasic nature is full of inexplicable phenomena, errors and events that defy our current understanding. These events can be perceived as "failures in reality" because they do not fit our conventional explanations.

Alter Ego of Reality: It is proposed that the Matrix is a distorted or altered version of reality, like an alter ego created consciously for the purpose of camouflage of reality. information and trying to misinform (just like the Internet today and other types of media and their multimedia content). Instead of presenting us with an accurate and complete picture of the truth, this version of reality hides or conceals aspects that we do not yet fully understand. This could include unexplained phenomena, anomalies or mysterious occurrences. that defy our normal expectations. Instead of relating the "Matrix" to the forces of Catabasis and Anabasis (previously discussed concepts that represent descents and promotions in the functioning of the whole), this perspective suggests that the "Matrix" is a way of covering up information that we are either not yet prepared to address, or It is inconceivable and incompatible with our life in a certain way, which gives rise and place to strange phenomena that escape our understanding.

Frequency Planes: Like the variable described in Tesla's Trivariables, it refers to the idea that there are different "planes" or levels of reality, each one characterized by their own vibrations or frequencies. These frequency planes can house entities and phenomena that are not easily accessible from our earthly perspective. It is proposed the idea that concepts such as heaven, paradise, Valhalla, Hades, Yomi, Duat, hell, and others are actually "frequency planes." This means that they are not necessarily physical places, but rather states or dimensions of existence that are related to certain frequencies of energy or consciousness. It is suggested that some of these Frequency planes adapt to our understanding and are represented in ways that we can understand. For example, the sky could be a representation of a higher frequency plane. elevated and harmonious, while hell could be a representation of a darker or more discordant frequency plane. Its aspects and understandings through our peripherals sensory would be adapted to our understanding. Furthermore, the possibility arises that some of these frequency planes are chronically in states of Catabasis or Anabasis. This means that they could be understood as constant realities of descent or ascent rather than simple temporary periods.

Entities and Avatarizations: A distinction is made between the entities that come from these frequency planes and the avatarizations of the Catabasis and the Anabasis. The aforementioned entities, such as God, Metatron, Buddha, Krishna, Brahma, Mara, Lucifer and others, are considered avatarizations of Catabasis and Anabasis, which implies that they represent aspects of descent and rise in consciousness or reality. While Frequent Entities are other types of entities, probably subject to the meanings of Eudaemonia and Cacodemonia, as well as They could have originated in places where the periods of Catabasis and Anabasis are chronic, and not temporary as in our world.

Tetralogy of Reality: It is suggested that these four concepts, science, magic, religion and philosophy, represent fundamental aspects of how human beings understand and relate to each other. relate to the universe that surrounds them. They refer to different dimensions of human experience.

Magic: Represents the area of the soul, the emotional and the feeling. It is associated with Yin, which symbolizes the feminine, and connects with desire and the heart. Furthermore, it is related to the water element.

Religion: Represents the area of the spirit, the spiritual and intuition. It is associated with Yang, which symbolizes the masculine, and refers to being and the air element.

Science: It is linked to the body and sensation. It represents the physical and the act. It is associated with Yin and the earth element.

Philosophy: It is related to the mind, thought and word. It is associated with Yang and connects with the mental and fire.

Unity in Diversity: Despite these divisions, it is proposed that all these concepts represent aspects of a unified reality.

each, the "unanimity" or "Monad". This suggests that, Ultimately, all of these dimensions of experience are interconnected and are aspects of a larger reality.

Manipulation and Profit: It is mentioned that in some cases, religion, science, magic and philosophy can be used in a manipulative way to control people or to obtain material benefits. It is suggested that this involves the use of malefic knowledge (Cacodemon) to generate a Catabasis, resulting in the proliferation of more Catabasis. in others. The objective of this manipulation would be to create an artificial Anabasis, a kind of substitute or substitute for true spiritual elevation.

Magic as Science Not Understood: It is suggested here that what we consider magic could simply be a form of science that we do not yet fully understand. This implies that the Magical phenomena could have an underlying scientific basis that, over time, we could discover and understand more fully.

Religion as Philosophy on Avatarizations of Catabasis and Anabasis: This point suggests that many religions are based on philosophical interpretations of concepts related to the Catabasis (descent) and the Anabasis (ascent). However, these interpretations can be distorted or malformed, and are often used to direct attention toward figures who embody these ideas, often in false or manipulative ways. Instead of empowering people to believe in themselves, these religions can maintain control on his followers, limiting their will and ability to think independently.

René Descartes and Cartesian Dualism: René Descartes was a 17th century French philosopher who proposed the idea of Cartesian dualism, which separates the mind (res cogitans) from the body. (extensive res). He argued that the mind and body are two different substances and that the mind is immaterial while the body is material.

George Berkeley and Immaterialism: George Berkeley was an 18th century Irish philosopher who developed the philosophy of immaterialism. He maintained that "esse est percipi" or "to be is to be." perceived (or perceive)." This means that only what is perceived, whether by us or by God, is real. In other words, reality exists based on perception. In this context, the figure of God is understood as an approach towards the Mesobasis, since the divine figures and similar are avatarizations of the Catabasis and Anabasis.

Copenhagen Interpretation: The Copenhagen Interpretation is an interpretation of quantum mechanics that raises questions about observation and reality. He maintains that the Particles can exist in multiple states until they are observed and, at that point, they collapse into a particular state. This has led to debates about the nature of reality in the context of quantum physics. It is likely that Catabasis and Anabasis act in a similar way, since "subtle events" normally occur when individuals remain in solitude or intimacy in the strictest and most unexpected way possible.

Paracatanodica Panoptica: The term "Paracatanodica Panoptica" seems to refer to a set of phenomena or concepts that involve the interaction between the Digital Panoptic System and Frequent Catabasic or Cacodemoniac Entities. These entities could be related to the supernatural, the paranormal or the inexplicable, and their interaction with the digital world It manifests itself through electronic and digital devices. It is suggested that human beings, called "Eudaimoniacs", believe in the avatarizations of Catabasis and Anabasis, as well as in other anabasic creatures. These terms seem to be related to concepts in philosophy and spirituality that involve duality or the interaction between forces. opposites, such as good and evil, positive and negative, evolution and involution, among others. Human beings are the only ones who can help themselves, even in life or death, despite being Eudaimonial and Cacodemoniac, which suggests that human beings have the ability to influence their own spiritual evolution or involution.

Simulation of reality: The idea that our reality could be a simulation generated by a higher entity or advanced technology is a recurring theme in philosophy and science. Science fiction. According to this hypothesis, our reality is created and processed as we experience it, which means that only the information necessary for what we are doing would be generated. observing or interacting, and the rest would be "saved" in terms of processing resources. This could explain why we do not perceive all the details of the world at once and why, In some cases, glitches or errors could occur in the simulation, such as physical anomalies or unexpected events.

licable.

Tree Koan: The question of whether a tree makes a noise when it falls if no one is there to hear it is a classic philosophical question. In the context of the simulation hypothesis, this question relates to the idea that reality is only created when it is observed. In other words, something only "exists" in the simulation when there is a conscious entity observing it. This perspective raises questions about the nature of reality and the relationship between observation and existence.

Quantum interpretation: The idea that reality behaves differently at the quantum level when it is not being observed is derived from the quantum interpretation of Copenhagen. According to this interpretation, subatomic particles can exist in multiple states or locations until they are observed, at which point they collapse into one state. specific. This has led to discussions about the influence of consciousness on physical reality at the quantum level.

Unlimited energy in simulation: The idea of a simulation of reality that has an unlimited energy source. In this scenario, there would be no need to economize processing resources, and instead, processing power would be used abundantly. This means that the simulation would run optimally and in extreme detail in all aspects, instead of focus only on what is observed or interacted with at a given moment.

Simulation that observes everything at the same time: It is suggested here that this simulation would be designed to observe and process everything simultaneously, at all times. Instead of generating information about reality only when someone is observing, this simulation would be constantly monitoring and processing every aspect of reality, without exception.

Exponential replay of simulations: These simulations could lead to new simulations exponentially. This means that the main simulation would generate other simulations, and these in turn could create more simulations, creating a cascade of simulation levels. Each simulation level could have its own unique rules and features.

Panoptic Architecture: “Panoptic architecture” is an intriguing concept that can be explored from several perspectives, including philosophy, technology, and simulation theory. The main idea Behind this architecture is that all aspects and elements of reality are constantly observed and processed, regardless of whether they are being observed by an individual or not. Here There is a more detailed explanation of "panoptic architecture" and its relationship with "Panoptic Physical Reality" (PRF):

Origin in philosophy and panopticism: The concept of "panoptic architecture" is derived in part from the philosophical ideas of Jeremy Bentham and his design of a prison called the "Panopticon." In this prison, all prisoners were visible from a central tower without them knowing if they were being observed at any given time. This generated a feeling of constant surveillance and control, even if there were not enough guards to watch all the prisoners all the time. It is likely that the origin of this idea occurred in the mythological creature Argos Panoptes.

Technological application: In the modern context, "panoptic architecture" could be considered an analogy to how information technology and digital connectivity enable constant observation and processing of data in our environment. The increasing presence of surveillance devices, cameras, sensors and digital tracking in everyday life It could be considered a form of "panoptic architecture" in which almost everything is being observed and recorded.

The "Panoptic Physical Reality" (RFP): This concept suggests that if we lived in an advanced simulation with an unlimited energy source, as mentioned above, the simulation It would be designed to observe and process everything at all times. Every aspect of reality, from subatomic particles to everyday objects and living beings, would be being monitored and processed without exception. This would translate into a "Panoptic Physical Reality" (PRF), where unobserved or unprocessed areas would not exist. The implications of a "Reality Panoptic Physics" would be profound. It would mean that everything in reality has a continuous existence and does not fade away when it is not being observed. Furthermore, the possibility of generating New simulations could exponentially lead to infinite complexity of the structure of reality. This raises profound questions about the nature of reality, the consciousness and the role of observation in creating and maintaining the world we experience.

The emergence of Mesobasis in this context would represent a fundamental point of balance between Catabasis and Anabasis. The Mesobasis would become the force that allows the

differentiation and understanding of dual states in human experience. In Eastern philosophy, this could be compared to the concept of 'Taiji', which represents the two polarities. However, in this context, the polarities are limited exclusively to Catabasis and Anabasis, without the balancing influence of Mesobasis.

In terms of 'Semicension', this understanding provides a solid basis for the idea that the ability to consciously traverse katabasic and anabasic states through

Mesobasis brings a greater sense of balance and purpose in life. The 'Semicension' would then be the process by which human beings can explore and understand these

differential states in duality, allowing you to navigate with greater flexibility and wisdom through the complexities of existence."

Mesobasis is a concept that incorporates elements of duality, balance, changes and transformation in human life and reality. Here are some quotes, historical events and works

literary that can help better identify what Mesobasis is:

Friedrich Nietzsche's Philosophy: Nietzsche was a philosopher who questioned traditional morality and advocated the creation of new values. His work "Thus Spoke Zarathustra" presents the idea of

"Übermensch" or "Superman", which represents the overcoming of conventional morality. Mesobasis can be related to Nietzsche's notion of transcending the duality of values

established morals and seek a new path that balances katabasis and anabasis in the search for new values and meaning in life.

Myth of Prometheus: The myth of Prometheus talks about stealing fire from the gods to give it to humans, symbolizing the human desire to advance and overcome limits. This act of defiance

The gods can be interpreted as an attempt by humans to seek Mesobasis, advancing in the midst of duality and seeking balance between catabasis and anabasis.

Movie "Blade Runner": This film and the novel on which it is based explore identity, humanity and technology. Replicants, artificially created beings, raise questions

about what it means to be human. The Mesobasis can be related to the exploration of the relationship between technology and humanity in a world where the limits between the two become

blurry.

Evolution of Technology: Throughout history, technological advances have generated profound changes in human society. The Industrial Revolution, for example, marked a

significant transition in which technology transformed people's lives. These changes represent periods of transition and duality in human life, which resemble the

search for Mesobasis in the midst of catabasis and anabasis.

Adam Jensen Monologue in "Deus Ex: Human Revolution": Adam Jensen's monologues in the game explore the relationship between technology and humanity, as well as the consequences of

human decisions in a world where technology plays a central role. These monologues resemble how the Mesobasis addresses similar themes of duality and balance in a context

futuristic and technological.

Aristotle's Philosophy: Aristotle emphasized the importance of balance and moderation in his ethics. His concept of virtue as the middle point between two extremes is related to

Mesobasis and its search for balance between catabasis and anabasis. This reflects how Aristotle advocated finding a middle way between opposite extremes, which resembles

to the search for balance in Mesobasis.

"War and Peace" by Leo Tolstoy: This epic novel explores the duality of war and peace in human life. Characters experience moments of catabasis during conflicts and

moments of anabasis in times of calm. Tolstoy's work illustrates how human beings face constant transitions between these dual states in their lives.

Plato's Cave Myth: In this myth, Plato describes the liberation of prisoners who have been chained in a cave all their lives, seeing only shadows on the wall. When

A prisoner is released and comes out into the sunlight, he experiences a transformation from ignorance to wisdom, which can be considered a katabasis and anabasis. The search of the truth

and knowledge represents Mesobasis, where individuals seek to free themselves from ignorance and move towards a deeper understanding of reality.

The Renaissance: The Renaissance was a historical period that marked a significant cultural transition from the Middle Ages to the Modern Age. During this time, there was a resurgence in

interest in classical scholarship, arts and science. This cultural transformation can be related to the Mesobasis, since it represents a transition from intellectual darkness

medieval in the light of classical knowledge, manifesting elements of change and advancement.

Humanism: Humanism was a cultural movement that promoted a focus on the individual, their potential, and their capacity for learning and achievement. This resembles the Mesobasis,

which highlights the importance of experience and individual transformation in the search for balance.

Existentialism: Existentialist philosophers such as Jean-Paul Sartre explored the duality of human existence and freedom of choice. Your focus on personal responsibility

and decision making relates to Mesobasis in terms of how human decisions and choices can lead to significant changes in life and society.

The Civil Rights Movement: The fight for equality and social justice, like the Civil Rights Movement in the United States, can be seen as a catabasis in which

People fight oppression and anabasis when they make significant progress in equality and civil rights. This movement reflects how Mesobasis involves the search

of justice and equity.

Darwin's Theory of Evolution: Charles Darwin's theory of evolution describes a process of change and adaptation in life on Earth over generations. This

The process can be interpreted as a katabasis and anabasis in the evolution of species as they adapt to the changing environment.

Taoism and Yin and Yang: Chinese Taoism is based on the principle of yin and yang, which symbolizes duality and the interconnection of opposing forces. Yin represents darkness,

passivity and receptivity, while yang represents light, activity and creativity. In Taoist philosophy, these forces are recognized as interdependent and

complementary, and their balance is essential for harmony. Similarly, Mesobasis seeks to understand how the katabasic and anabasic elements are intertwined and balanced.

in human experience.

Jungian Psychology: Carl Jung spoke about the integration of opposites in human psychology. His concept of "individuation" implies the search for a balance between opposite aspects

of the psyche, which resembles Mesobasis and its integration of dual elements.

Chaos Theory: Chaos theory suggests that complex systems can exhibit unpredictable and chaotic behavior. In life, we often experience moments of catabasis and

anabasis that may appear chaotic and yet are interconnected in the Mesobasis.

Politics and International Conflict: History is full of examples of political conflicts and wars that have led entire societies to periods of catabasis, followed by efforts

of reconciliation and reconstruction that represent anabasis.

Duality in Religion: Many religions present concepts of duality, such as good and evil, heaven and hell. These dual elements can be interpreted as manifestations

of Mesobasis in human spirituality.

The Painting "The Garden of Earthly Delights" by Hieronymus Bosch: This masterpiece of art shows a vision of life that encompasses katabasis and anabasis. The side panels represent the

paradise and hell, while the central panel shows a scene that could be considered Mesobasis, where the unknown mixes with the known.

The Butterfly Effect in Chaos Theory: The Butterfly Effect is an example of how small changes can have significant effects on a complex system. This is related to how the

Individual decisions and actions can influence the Mesobasis and affect one's life and the lives of others.

The Existentialist Philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre: Sartre spoke about human freedom and responsibility. His idea that we are "condemned to be free" involves making decisions that

They can lead to catabasis or anabasis, reflecting Mesobasis.

The Industrial Revolution: The Industrial Revolution was a radical change in production and technology, marking a transition from manual to mechanized production. It was a moment of

catabasis in which society experienced challenges and transformations, but also an anabasis as advances in production and efficiency were achieved. This period represents

the Mesobasis in human history, with its duality of challenge and progress.

The Myth of Icarus: The myth of Icarus and Daedalus is a clear metaphor for katabasis and anabasis. Icarus, driven by ambition, ascends towards the sun with wings made of wax, representing

the anabasis in search of freedom and elevation. However, his arrogant flight takes him too close to the sun, and the wax melts, resulting in his fall, representing the

catabasis. This myth illustrates how excessive pursuit of elevation can lead to fall, highlighting the importance of balance in Mesobasis.

#mesobasis #catabasis #katabasis #anabasis #philosphy #essay #dualism

[ahalal-uralma]

Dead Can Dance - 'Anabasis'

#dead can dance #anabasis #music

[yourwindgodgirl]

Western Hoplites versus Asian Hordes?

Upon my finishing of reading Xenophon’s Anabasis, I found one of my edition’s appendices—written by classical scholar Tim Rood—regarding the legacy of Anabasis quite interesting:

The trend of comparing Anabasis with modern expeditions continues in the twenty-first century. One of the first accounts published after the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq in 2003 was entitled The March Up and inspired by Anabasis. This account presents the modern US Marines as the Ten Thousand reincarnated: they are "today's hoplites," "the inheritors of Xenophon's code of bravery and camaraderie." At the same time, such scholars as Victor Davis Hanson have achieved a huge following with works that openly exploit ancient history for political arguments about the present; Hanson, as the title of his 2001 best seller puts it, has even claimed that the qualities displayed by the Ten Thousand can help explain "Why the West Has Won." — The Landmark Xenophon's Anabasis, Appendix R

I found myself agreeing with the acknowledgement of the West’s frequent comparisons between itself and Greek hoplites. However, I do believe this trend is also deeply inspired by Herodotus, in particular with his description of the Battle of Thermopylae.

Herodotus, of course, recounted the deeds of 300 brave Spartans (and several thousands of their helots) against millions of soldiers from the combined Persian army. The Spartans, who were known for their ability to produce the finest warriors through an intense training program and what might as well been a state eugenics program, successfully held off the Persians, who were numerated and delineated by their various ethnicities (for example, Persians, Medians, Scythians, Egyptians, and many more), for days before being defeated by the actions of a traitor. The Spartans achieved this with their aforementioned training, superior arms and armor, and tactical position between the Hot Gates. The Persians are portrayed as an invading horde made of all the peoples of Asia, clumsy and so uninspired to attack such a well fortified position for days, taking many losses. This was one of the first, if not the first, accounts of conflicts between East and West, and I am convinced that it has proved to be influential.

This dichotomy, of well-trained and well-equipped Western armies prevailing over stupid and nearly suicidal Asian armies has persisted even to the modern era. Western pop history is wont to apply a “Greco-Persian dichotomy” to many conflicts. I can relate two popular examples.

The Eastern Front of World War II has been imagined as similar to the Greco-Persian conflicts in the popular conscious. The German army inflicted mass and disproportionate casualties to the Soviet Red Army, which has been commonly portrayed as Asian in racist attempts to dehumanize it (laypeople today often say that Slavic peoples are not White). As such, the Germans represent the Greeks, but instead of the metal armor, hoplon shield, and double pointed spear, their equipment consisted of the famous MG 42, Tiger tank, and Stuka dive bomber. Instead of displaying martial brilliance by holding the position at the Hot Gates, the Germans are known for inventing the Blitzkrieg strategy that gave them such success between 1939-1940. The Spartan comparison goes further when one remembers that the mythos of the German soldier was that he had superior training and discipline, no doubt in relation to his state’s eugenics program.

Meanwhile, depictions of the Red Army are appalling. Westerners are most well-acquainted with several popular stories of Soviets going into battle charging the German lines lacking even a rifle, rather drowning the Germans in “human waves.” The Red Army supposedly consisted of primarily unwilling and dumb conscripts, who were forced into battle by political commissars who would machine-gun down any cowards. This is quite similar to the Greek stereotyping of Persians, who supposedly led their armies with whips. These stories have been most infamously related in the movie Enemy at the Gates and the video game Call of Duty: World at War. (It should be noted that I do not deny the fact that these stories regarding the Soviets happened, but I recognize that they were not the norm.) Thus, the Soviets are the Persians in this dichotomy, and further habit to differentiate individual Soviets based on their ethnic origin (for example, Russians, Georgians, Kazakhs, and many more) makes me more convinced in this comparison.

A second application of the Greco-Persian dichotomy is seen in the popular imagination of the Korean War. UN forces, who are the seen as the Greeks, were able to push back the North Koreans to the Chinese border with new and superior weaponry such as the M46 Patton and F-86 Sabre, while having superior training and discipline by virtue of being led by seasoned WWII NCOs and officers, along with a certain General MacArthur, whose daring landing at Inchon is forever to be known as a moment of military genius that turned the tide of the war in the UN’s favor. This success would be quickly turned around when what is commonly described as a “horde” of Chinese became involved in the war and crossed over into Korea. The North Korean and Chinese used poor and outdated equipment, and resorted to “human wave” tactics, smartly choosing to charge and engage the UN forces in close quarters. It is again obvious that the Communist side has obtained the specter of the Persians.

We come back to the beginning quote of this post. Again, the Greco-Persian dichotomy is explicity applied to a conflict involving East versus West. American hoplites, with all the toys of modern war, versus an untrained and underequipped Iraqi army.

It seems that whenever a war or conflict involving Westerners fighting Easterners occurs, Westerners often take it upon themselves to describe themselves as having the superior training, tactics, and equipment, while the Easterners, depicted as stupid, untrained, and barbaric, have only superior numbers, or the “horde.” Intentionally or unintentionally, these comparisons bring back the legacy of the Greco-Persian conflicts, including the action at Thermopylae and the story of Xenophon’s Anabasis. Herodotus and Xenophon can be said to have perhaps laid the groundwork for the popular historiography of Europeans in conflict with Asians due to the repeating patterns seen in the topic’s pop history.

#history #greek history #xenophon #anabasis #classical history

[ofelijadrowned]

xenophon's anabasis needs to be turned into a tv series

#i am currently translating the anabasis and the plot twists are keeping me gasping #i got to orontas the persian who was at war with cyrus and has since then had a change of heart #so he tells cyrus “lend me a thousand horsmen and i'll capture the people that are causing you problems” #and cyrus agrees to lend him the horsemen #next chapter orontas is SENDING A LETTER TO THE KING???? AND GIVES IT TO HIS TRUSTED FRIEND WHO THEN BETRAYS HIM #AND GIVES THE LETTER TO CYRUS #ancient greek #anabasis #xenophon #classics

[minpo-no-tobira]

クセノフォン・アナバシス

　やっと、第1巻第9節まで読み進んだ。第8節の終わりでキュロスは倒れる。だから、第9節は、彼の生涯をたたえる挿話的部分である。第10節から、現在に戻り、キュロスが倒れたことを知らず、自分の翼では勝利を収めているので、全体としても勝利したと誤解した指揮者たちが、その誤解を知らされ、戦後処理をどうするかの検討に移っていく。

　戦いは紀元前401年の夏であった。今からおよそ2400年前ということになる。それにしても、クセノフォンが再現する内容が醸し出す感銘は変わらない。キュロスが功を急がず、戦いを進めたら、その後の歴史はどう異なったであろうか。

　翻訳で通読はしているが、原文から読むと、写本による伝承の制約から、文法的に苦しい（不自然な）ところが、実感される。

　ちょっと、読解が進歩したなと気を許すと、ドカンとやられる。だが、同じ人間が使った言語と思えば、文法の知識を総動員して、かじりついていけば、少しずつ石でもうがたれていくと信じるしかない。

#Xenophon #anabasis

[jerichopalms]

Am I waiting until I become a little older? I shall never be any older at all if I am taken by the enemy today.

Anabasis by Xenophon

#anabasis #xenophon #book quotes

[conceptofjoy]

#d draws #they've been on my mind.. readin a short fic of guardian strilondes in the dream bubbles called anabasis #hs.alpha bro #hs.bro #alpha guardians #beta guardians

[deancasforcutie]

DeanCas reunion in the soul's paradise but it's that scene from the Purgatorio where Dante swoons at Beatrice mercilessly roasting him

#rn I'm seeing Dean as like any number of medieval protagonists who go through a catabasis/anabasis and struggle to let go of worldly things #like the Pearl protag hearing his lost loved one describe how great Heaven is and he's just Not Getting It asking when they'll meet again #little rusty on our Dante boys?????? allegorical heavenly dream visions my beloved <3 #supernatural #spn #the winchesters #it's underrated due for a reboot #dean winchester #castiel #destiel #spn headcanon #spn crack #mine

[thoodleoo]

katabasis is a beautiful name for a baby girl

#naming my daughters katabasis and anabasis and pitting them against each other like antigone and ismene #tagamemnon #queueusque tandem abutere catilina patientia nostra

[thearchaicsmile]

Ancient Greek Word of the Day

θάλαττα | thalatta (possibly from ἅλς, "sea foam, sea salt") — sea, ocean, a body of salt water [such as a strait or channel]; maritime or nautical affairs

#wotd #word of the day #ancient greek word of the day #ancient greece #ancient greek #classics #classical lang #will always remember that splendid passage from xenophon's anabasis #when the greek army finally reaches the coast after months in the desert and begins crying out θάλαττα! θάλαττα! θάλαττα!

[simmonsized]

Tagged by @ispybluesky ! C:

shuffle your on repeat playlist and list the first 10 songs, then tag 10 people

1. Madness - Muse

2. Lump - The Presidents of the United States of America

3. The Kid Who Drowned at Summer Camp - Hot Sugar

4. Haven't Met You Yet - Michael Bublé

5. Dancing in the Moonlight - Toploader

6. Dirty Imbecile - The Happy Fits

7. Houston, TX - Deer Tick

8. Labyrinth - Miracle Musical (Shane Maux, KAYE)

9. Under Attack - ABBA

10. Three In the Morning [Kali's 2 in the AM PM Edit] - Robert "Kali" Baker (The Homestuck Fan Musicians, or Land of Fans and Music Vol. 2, in case u were curious)

I taaaaggg ummm @future-geometries , @robothell , @futurama , @alexharrier , @stardustyheart , @agenttexsflippedshit , @boyvandals , @crownhimmanycrowns ,@dolichomorph , and @eggwyrt

all beloved friends c: (and absolutely no pressure because you know, it is for fun!)

#this doesn't ask for playlist title or anything but it is my anabasis playlist #''the ascent'' btw #i think i am so funny etc #this was fun thank u eli

[blueindigosan]

La Congenie - The Congenial

En el complejo tapiz de la humanidad, las diferencias entre individuos se manifiestan de formas notables. Comenzando por la conciencia, es evidente que no todos los seres humanos se encuentran en el mismo nivel. Un ejemplo fascinante se aprecia al comparar a individuos mas inclinados hacia un lado mas salvaje y bestializado de su persona con respecto a otros que tienen una inclinacion hacia un lado mas civilizado y humanizado de dicha persona. Mientras que los primeros estan anclados en elementos mas basicos de la supervivencia, los otros operan bajo parametros mas avanzados y complejos. Esta distinción se refleja en cómo perciben y abordan la vida.

Al aplicar esta idea al concepto de meritocracia, emerge un paisaje de competitividad tóxica y luchas internas entre el ego y el espíritu. La clasificación de individuos según su disposición al cambio resulta una herramienta útil en este escenario. Mientras algunos pueden evolucionar, otros enfrentan dificultades o incluso la imposibilidad de hacerlo. Pero el verdadero factor no radica en la capacidad para cambiar, sino en la disposición hacia el cambio.

Es como atravesar un laberinto: cada individuo traza su propio camino desde el punto A al punto B. Mientras algunos seguirán rutas familiares, otros explorarán caminos alternativos. En el mundo humano, el sistema no opera en base a deseos o ambiciones, sino en lo que realmente encaja o se conecta de forma natural con cada individuo. Es como la lente de una cámara: cada configuración revela diferentes aspectos del mismo paisaje, otorgando una perspectiva única.

El deseo puede resultar vano si no encaja verdaderamente con el individuo. La naturaleza misma muestra cómo algunos elementos se complementan mientras otros se anulan entre sí. Del mismo modo, las personas encuentran afinidad o discrepancia entre sí, generando diversos momentos y situaciones.

Cuando la mayoría de los individuos adopta una disposición hacia la supervivencia o la excelencia, se produce un cambio palpable en la sociedad. Las épocas de Catabasis generan sentimientos negativos como engreimiento, desprecio, orgullo, exigencia, indiferencia, vengatividad, antagonizacion, ira, odio, agresión, negatividad, decepcion, deseo, anhelo, esclavitud, castigo, temor, ansiedad, retraimiento, altividad, trágico, sufrimiento, remordimiento, desaliento, censurador, desesperanzador, apático, desesperador, renuncia, vindicativo, maligno, culpa, malicia, destrucción, desdeñoso, miserable, vergüenza, humillación y eliminación. Mientras que las épocas de Anabasis despiertan emociones más positivas como permisividad, factibilidad, consentimiento, emporderamiento, tolerante, satisfacción, neutralidad, confianza, liberación, edificante, esperanzador, voluntad, optimista, intencional, misericordioso, armonioso, aceptación, perdón, transcendencia, sabiduría, significancia, razón, comprensión, abstracción, amor, benignidad, cariño, veneración, revelación, unidad, plenitud, alegría, serenidad, transfiguración, pléroma, perfeccion, paz, extasis e iluminación.

Para escapar de la Catabasis, actualmente se pone énfasis en el hedonismo, buscando vivir conforme a una serie de placeres sucedaneos como forma de evitar el sentimiento o los sentimientos que genera el estado de supervivencia. Esto se vuelve como tal una incongruencia vital, puesto que el deseo que se persigue es intercedido por otros factores, y el hedonismo supervivencial esta categorizado y bañado por estas emociones al ser una forma de intentar eludir dichos problemas o circunstancias, lo que obliga a que las personas respondan como realmente se sienten. Este enfoque puede compararse con la domesticación de animales salvajes, mostrando cómo algunas personas se mueven en distintos grados de salvajismo y sociabilidad.

La congruencia entre las personas es fundamental. No se trata de juzgar a otros, sino de discernir si encajan en nuestra vida, o nosotros en la suya. Esto puede generar frustración al desear algo que no se conecta con nuestra esencia, puesto que al perseguir un deseo, se persigue por tanto una ilusion de aquello que creemos necesitar, cuando lo que realmente necesitamos se congenia con nosotros de forma tan natural que suple la demanda de ese objetivo al instante y de forma pletorica. A raiz de esto, las personas que se aprovechan de los deseos de otros usan el mismo deseo y ansia para obtener lo que ellos quieren, valiendose de la necesidad del otro. El deseo no es un objetivo, aunque lo parezca, y se confunde con la congenie, la capacidad de encajar, conectar y ensamblar una cosa con otra de forma totalmente natural, mientras que los deseos son “congenies artificiales”, elementos o artefactos que hacen creer por apariencia u otros metodos que son lo que va a suplir la necesidad demandada, cuando realmente esconde una cara mas retorcida, que son problemas silenciados, altercados u otros tipos de factores trampa. Esto lleva a que algunas personas esten conformes con valores de vida bajos, mientras otras aspiran a valores de vida más elevados.

En esencia, cada individuo tiene diferentes posibilidades de avanzar o retroceder en el camino de la congenie. La predisposición inicial y los factores estáticos y móviles como la experiencia, el tiempo, el conocimiento, la retrospectiva, el pensamiento critico, etc, condicionan los valores y subvalores de cada individuo. Nadie es juez, jurado y verdugo salvo en su propia vida, con sus propias decisiones, acciones y emociones, asi como nadie tiene el derecho de serlo con otros salvo si existe motivo o justificacion para ello de manera equivalente.

Las prioridades de las personas cambian dependiendo de su estado de Catabasis o Anabasis, ya que sus modelos mentales y conciencias encajan con esas necesidades. La conciencia se asemeja a un engranaje que puede salirse de su lugar, causando frustración y repercutiendo en las relaciones sociales. Es decir, que los actos, pensamientos y emociones de uno pueden afectar tanto a uno como a otros, y aquello que encaje en el propio individuo, puede desencajar en individuos ajenos al mismo, ya sean conocidos, desconocidos, lejanos, cercanos, etc. Aunque se busque agradar, es imposible congeniar con todos. Así, algunas personas avanzan juntas, mientras otras continúan en soledad. Aquello que congenia y encaja con uno es aquello que tiene realmente sentido de su existencia, mientras que aquello con los valores invertidos es, como tal, un “Desencaje”, una anulacion, un estancamiento, una manifestacion de la Catabasis, a diferencia de la Anabasis de la congenie. De este desencaje, es donde nace el deseo, el anhelo, la ambicion, la persecucion del objetivo para suplir una demanda y satisfacer una necesidad como tal a causa del propio desencaje o desajuste. Esto es lo que da a entender que los deseos son busquedas artificiales de obtener o generar la Congenie, mientras que la Congenie no necesita una busqueda como tal, es y aparece como tal, al natural y sin intervencion ninguna de otras mecanicas o elementos, encajando en la vida del individuo de forma correcta y aceptada, sin proceso de duda o rechazo. Existen infinidad de valores que diferencian a las personas entre si, y puede ser que lo que condiciona parte de estos valores y sub-valores es la predisposición inicial de la persona hacia lo que congenia con ella, asi como los factores estáticos y móviles. La congenie puede interpretarse como una pieza de puzzle multifacetica en la que, para el individuo congeniador, es claramente aceptable, y para otros, es claramente inaceptable, similar a un conglomerado de piezas de puzzle que, entresijadas, forman un lienzo, una imagen. Pero, ¿Que ocurre cuando esta imagen se altera continuamente? que unos aceptan la imagen, y otros la rechazan, y esta disposicion se da mediante la Anabasis y Catabasis de manera continuada. Si se tratase de encajar la pieza del puzzle a la fuerza en algun lugar, seria evidentemente incomodo y demasiado forzado, como hacer un amarre amoroso, un contrato con alguien no muy fiable, o simplemente ir a la ligera y accionar lo que sea. Es por ello recomendable la paciencia en este tipo de casos.

Las relaciones humanas están intrínsecamente ligadas al concepto de la congruencia entre individuos. Cuando algo encaja, las personas permanecen con otras siempre y cuando algo encaje con las mismas, logrando que las relaciones perduren; sin embargo, ante un desencaje, estas se desvanecen y cada una camina hacia la busqueda de aquello que creen que encaje en su vida, cuando sucede como una busqueda activa o directa, se convierte en un deseo, es decir, la busqueda de la obtencion de algo que supla una demanda que es originada de una necesidad, cuando se convierte en una busqueda inactiva o indirecta, se convierte en una congenie, algo que realmente se conecte con su vida, es decir, una conexion innata con algo o alguien que predeterminadamente encaja con uno mismo. Existen personas que han buscado metodos para tratar con las Anabasis y Catabasis y sus avatarizaciones, siendo estos contratos con entidades que prometen algo demasiado bueno, pero realmente no lo es, el caso de un amarre en el contexto del misticismo, la fachada de actitudes excesivamente permisivas y buenas como algo necesario, negando la otra parte del ser vivo que le permite defenderse de peligros y amenazas, o bien los pedidos basados en religiones, credos y creencias. Todo ello puede llegar a tener un mal desenlace, porque al desearlo, se espera a que ese deseo encaje con uno, pero realmente no lo hara, de lo contrario ya lo habría hecho, y para que ese deseo sea como uno dice, suele venir disfrazado de otra manera, al desear, se obtiene una fachada que cubre superficialmente de forma falsa esa necesidad, pero viene acompañado de problemas, otras necesidades y otros elementos negativos para el deseador.

A menudo, las personas caen en la trampa de los deseos basados en promesas tentadoras o anhelos superficiales. Estos deseos suelen venir disfrazados y, al ser cumplidos, revelan su verdadera cara, trayendo consigo problemas y necesidades adicionales. Es común intentar modificar elementos o incluso lobotomizar emocionalmente a seres vivos para forzar un encaje, lo que lleva a una sensación a largo plazo de resignación ante haber encontrado eso que se pretendia encontrar, sin embargo, esa busqueda, ese anhelo no es aquello que realmente encaja, es similar a amarrar a algo o alguien contra su voluntad, una forma de esclavizar y ser esclavizado a la vez, ambas por un deseo, una ambicion, un anhelo, una atraccion obsesiva. Normalmente, existe un deseo constante de querer crear algo, conseguir algo antes que otros, o bien disfrutar de la exclusividad de un momento, un objeto, un evento, una persona, etc, en base a la necesidad emitida y la calidad emitida, o el aspecto emitido, debido a los recuerdos sensoriales y las apreciaciones de los estimulos de estos, ansiando elementos que no se pueden obtener, y que si se insiste en ello, uno ha de resignarse normalmente a, o bien tenerlo de una forma que no agrade realmente al deseador, o no tenerlo. Disponer de una necesidad que implica un deseo el cual busca aquello que cree encajar en la vida de uno inicia busquedas externas normalmente, pero realmente es mejor no buscar, ya que de lo contrario, si fuera una congenie, se sentiria una conexion desde el principio y desde adentro, y no se intentaria establecer una conexion como tal. Para ello, se hace ver una fachada de primer plano en los sentidos que deja una fuerte impresión y causa que la persona crea, sin posibilidad de acudir al pensamiento critico, que realmente es eso y porque es eso, debido al constante bombardeo sensorial o multimedia por parte del Panoptes Digital.

La conciencia humana se ve afectada por estímulos sensoriales, siendo el contenido multimedia y los elementos audiovisuales una herramienta poderosa para insertar deseos y búsquedas artificiales, sin embargo la mas completa es la musica, ya que es una de las formas mas rapidas a traves de su cimatica, estableciendo “encajes emocionales”, es decir, mutaciones en el estado animico y mental . Esta influencia conlleva a confusiones entre deseos y necesidades genuinas, creando lo que se llama "congenies artificiales", intentos fallidos de replicar lo que se sabe encaja en la vida de uno, pero con elementos inapropiados o incorrectos. Es comun confundir un deseo con una necesidad que congenie con uno mismo, y muchas veces se producen las congenies artificiales, intentos de replica de aquello que se sabe que congenia en la vivencia de cada uno, pero esta configurado o creado con los elementos inapropiados, o mediante la forma inapropiada. Los deseos pueden volverse en contra ya que uno cree normalmente que eso con lo que no tiene una conexión previa es necesario con uno, por lo que se busca su obtención, pero luego del cumplimiento de ese deseo, se sufre la implementación a la fuerza de aquello que no congenia, y se tiende a rechazar o aburrirse de ese deseo manifestado rápidamente, anhelando otro elemento mejor o mas completo que lo sustituya, o bien diferente a este al aborrecerlo. Cuando algo congenia realmente con uno o con su vida, se siente una conexión, se percibe una conexión de antemano, atemporal y aespacial, ya sea por intuición, conocimiento directo o indirecto, o bien por otros términos. Aquellas personas inclinadas a las zonas mas bajas de la conciencia buscan el deseo y se resignan conformantes con el, ya que les satisface en primera instancia y eso da lugar a otra búsqueda de un deseo mayor, y asi sucesivamente. La persecución de deseos y congenie muy rara vez puede llegarse a dar, no es imposible, pero es excesivamente difícil que ocurra, y se le llama “casualidad”, “milagro” o “suerte”, pero normalmente la congenie y los deseos son diferentes, porque la congenie se basa en aquello que predeterminadamente encaja con un ser vivo, aquello que esta hecho para uno, profetizado, predestinado, y el deseo es la expresión manifiesta del ser vivo de buscar aquello que cree que encaja con el.  Los seres humanos se lamentan por no poder otorgar los deseos a otros seres humanos que estos persiguen, sin embargo, cuando se sabe que eso congenia o no con esa persona, cuando se sabe que eso puede o no hacerle mal, se intenta evitar, y eso resulta en conflictos a veces.

Es común que los deseos no se alineen con lo que realmente encaja en la vida de uno. A menudo, la persecución de deseos lleva a una secuencia interminable de anhelos insatisfechos, dado que suelen bombardear y explotar las necesidades de las personas para que traten de obtener aquello que creen que realmente vale la pena, cuando en verdad es una trampa para el deseador, y una forma sutilmente sucia de obtener algo a costa de otros mediante el dador del deseo. La verdadera congenie se siente desde el principio, sin necesidad de explicaciones o demostraciones, y se manifiesta en multitud de casos, como los amores instantaneos, las hermandades puras, los lazos familiares indelebles, o las amistades mas poderosas, conexiones instantaneas o lentas que traen profundidad entre personas, o incluso habilidades que se dominan virtuosamente sin tener experiencia previa.

Los seres humanos, arrastrados por los deseos, a veces buscan obtener lo anhelado por encima de lo que realmente encaja con ellos. Sin embargo, esto conlleva a una pérdida al final, donde los deseos se convierten en meros vestigios de lo que la congenie realmente representa. Por ende, las búsquedas activas y forzosas alejan a uno de su verdadero ser, ya que evitan lo que verdaderamente encaja. Cuando se busca un deseo, es similar a pactar con un demonio, llevar a cabo un amarre de magia, o incluso levantar a los muertos de sus tumbas, son intereferencias con el curso natural de las propias fuerzas Anabasicas y Catabasicas, y esa interrupcion tiene como consecuencia la obtencion superficial del deseo, que enmascara una “regañina” o una leccion escondida a traves de un desencaje adrede. El dilema de los deseos y las congenies es si anteponerse a aquello que encaja con un ser vivo en favor del deseo expresado, o evadir los deseos, ser paciente, esperar y obtener aquello que congenia con uno realmente. Cuando algo congenia con alguien no se necesita explicación de ninguna manera, ni forma que reafirme ese sentimiento, se sabe, tal y como los amores a primera vista, las conexiones entre personas que parecen conocerse de toda la vida, o la extraña naturalidad y virtuosismo que se da al empuñar o practicar una habilidad sin haber tenido una experiencia anterior con eso mismo, amistades eternas, lazos familiares indelebles por las barreras del tiempo u otras fuerzas, pero normalmente se hace ver que los deseos son la fuerza predominante, y se suele sugerir “buscar, perseguir y conseguirlos con esfuerzo o astucia”, una forma indirecta de dirigir a la persona hacia una dirección lejana de su congenie y acercarla hacia algo que no tiene nada que ver con ella, prometiendo una mejor situación si eso se consigue, un estatus mas alto, casi como por marketing, se suele ofrecer los deseos como suplidores de necesidades, sin embargo, aun si se hace realidad, no suple, solo da la apariencia de que puede suplir. Se puede desear lo que se quiera, incluso habrá personas que tienten la necesidad a traves de dar aquello que tanto se ha buscado, pero realmente no merece la pena, en todo caso, esa persona se habrá beneficiado y el individuo deseador habrá sido despojado de algo.  Cuando algo pertenece a la Congenie se nota, se siente, se percibe, se entiende como algo propio y de pertenencia individual, y suele suceder en explicita intimidad o de forma inesperada. Y al final los deseos son solo vestigios, recuerdos, ecos lejanos de lo que la Congenie realmente es. Por eso las búsquedas activas forzosas no tienen sentido ni funcionan, por que en ese mismo proceso, uno se aleja de lo que realmente es para el. En Metafisica, se suele nombrar las leyes de atracción y otros elementos similares, de que el pensamiento es lo que atrae, pero no se trata tanto de esto. En este caso, se trata del elemento que esta conectado a uno, como las creencias niponas. Las expediciones de deseos eluden aquello que encaja con uno, por lo que es mejor “dejar fluir”, permitir que la vida procese los eventos y acontecimientos tal como vengan, sin interrumpirla o interrumpirse uno u a otros.

En la metafísica, se plantea que el pensamiento atrae, pero más allá de eso, se trata de encontrar lo que está conectado con uno mismo, algo similar a la creencia nipona de que, todo aquello con lo que se ha interactuado alguna vez tiene una conexion con nosotros. Las expediciones de deseos desvían de lo que encaja, por lo que en lugar de buscar, es más sabio dejar fluir, permitiendo que la vida procese los eventos sin forzar ni interrumpir el curso natural de las cosas.

┉┅━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┅┉

In the complex tapestry of humanity, differences between individuals manifest themselves in remarkable ways. Starting with consciousness, it is evident that not all human beings are at the same level. A fascinating example is seen when comparing individuals more inclined towards a more savage and bestialized side of their person with respect to others who have an inclination towards a more civilized and humanized side of said person. While the first are anchored in the most basic elements of survival, the others operate under more advanced and complex parameters. This distinction is reflected in how they perceive and approach life.

When applying this idea to the concept of meritocracy, a landscape of toxic competitiveness and infighting between ego and spirit emerges. The classification of individuals according to their willingness to change is a useful tool in this scenario. While some can evolve, others face difficulties or even the impossibility of doing so. But the real factor lies not in the ability to change, but in the willingness to change.

It's like going through a maze: each individual traces their own path from point A to point B. While some will follow familiar routes, others will explore alternative paths. In the human world, the system does not operate based on desires or ambitions, but on what really fits or connects naturally with each individual. It's like a camera lens: each setting reveals different aspects of the same landscape, giving a unique perspective.

The desire can be vain if it does not truly fit the individual. Nature itself shows how some elements complement each other while others cancel each other out. In the same way, people find affinity or disagreement with each other, generating various moments and situations.

When the majority of individuals adopt a disposition towards survival or excellence, a palpable change occurs in society. Catabasis times generate negative feelings such as conceit, contempt, pride, demand, indifference, vindictiveness, antagonization, anger, hatred, aggression, negativity, disappointment, desire, longing, slavery, punishment, fear, anxiety, withdrawal, haughtiness, tragic, suffering, remorse, discouragement, censorious, hopeless, apathetic, despairing, renunciation, vindictive, evil, guilt, malice, destruction, disdainful, miserable, shame, humiliation and elimination. While the ages of Anabasis awaken more positive emotions such as permissiveness, practicability, consent, empowerment, tolerant, contentment, neutrality, trust, liberation, uplifting, hopeful, willing, optimistic, intentional, merciful, harmonious, acceptance, forgiveness, transcendence, wisdom , significance, reason, understanding, abstraction, love, kindness, affection, veneration, revelation, unity, plenitude, joy, serenity, transfiguration, pleroma, perfection, peace, ecstasy and illumination.

To escape from Catabasis, emphasis is currently placed on hedonism, seeking to live according to a series of substitute pleasures as a way of avoiding the feeling or feelings generated by the state of survival. This becomes as such a vital incongruity, since the desire that is pursued is interceded by other factors, and survival hedonism is categorized and bathed by these emotions as it is a way of trying to avoid said problems or circumstances, which forces us to People respond how they really feel. This approach can be compared to the domestication of wild animals, showing how some people move through varying degrees of wildness and sociability.

Congruence between people is essential. It is not about judging others, but about discerning if they fit into our lives, or we into theirs. This can generate frustration by wanting something that does not connect with our essence, since when pursuing a desire, we therefore pursue an illusion of what we believe we need, when what we really need fits with us in such a natural way that it replaces the demand that objective instantly and in a plethora of ways. As a result of this, people who take advantage of the desires of others use the same desire and desire to obtain what they want, taking advantage of the need of the other. Desire is not an objective, although it may seem like it, and it is confused with congenie, the ability to fit, connect and assemble one thing with another in a completely natural way, while desires are “artificial congenies”, elements or artifacts that make believing by appearance or other methods that they are what is going to meet the requested need, when in reality it hides a more twisted face, which are silenced problems, altercations or other types of trap factors. This leads some people to be satisfied with low life values, while others aspire to higher life values.

In essence, each individual has different possibilities of moving forward or backward on the path of congenie. The initial predisposition and static and mobile factors such as experience, time, knowledge, hindsight, critical thinking, etc., condition the values and subvalues of each individual. No one is judge, jury and executioner except in their own life, with their own decisions, actions and emotions, just as no one has the right to be so with others unless there is reason or justification for it in an equivalent way.

People's priorities change depending on their state of Catabasis or Anabasis, as their mental models and consciousness fit those needs. Consciousness is similar to a gear that can get out of place, causing frustration and impacting social relationships. That is to say, one's actions, thoughts and emotions can affect both one and others, and what fits the individual himself may not fit individuals outside of him, whether they are known, unknown, distant, close, etc. Even if you try to please, it is impossible to get along with everyone. Thus, some people move forward together, while others continue alone. That which is congenial and fits with one is that which really makes sense of its existence, while that with inverted values is, as such, a “Disconnection”, an annulment, a stagnation, a manifestation of the Catabasis, unlike the Anabasis of congenie. From this mismatch is where desire, longing, ambition, the pursuit of the objective is born to meet a demand and satisfy a need as such due to the mismatch or mismatch itself. This is what implies that desires are artificial searches to obtain or generate Congenie, while Congenie does not need a search as such, it is and appears as such, naturally and without the intervention of any other mechanics or elements, fitting together. in the life of the individual in a correct and accepted way, without a process of doubt or rejection. There are countless values that differentiate people from each other, and it may be that what conditions part of these values and sub-values is the person's initial predisposition towards what suits them, as well as static and mobile factors. Congenie can be interpreted as a multifaceted puzzle piece in which, for the congenial individual, it is clearly acceptable, and for others, it is clearly unacceptable, similar to a conglomerate of puzzle pieces that, interwoven, form a canvas, an image. But what happens when this image is continually altered? that some accept the image, and others reject it, and this disposition occurs through Anabasis and Catabasis in a continuous manner. If it were a matter of forcibly fitting the piece of the puzzle somewhere, it would obviously be uncomfortable and too forced, like making a love affair, a contract with someone not very reliable, or simply going lightly and doing whatever. Patience is therefore recommended in this type of case.

Human relationships are intrinsically linked to the concept of congruence between individuals. When something fits, people stay with others as long as something fits with them, making relationships last; However, in the face of a mismatch, these fade and each one walks towards the search for what they believe fits into their life. When it happens as an active or direct search, it becomes a desire, that is, the search for obtaining of something that meets a demand that is originated from a need, when it becomes an inactive or indirect search, it becomes a congenie, something that really connects with your life, that is, an innate connection with something or someone that by default fits with oneself. There are people who have sought methods to deal with the Anabasis and Catabasis and their avatarizations, these being contracts with entities that promise something too good, but it really is not, the case of a mooring in the context of mysticism, the facade of excessively permissive and good as something necessary, denying the other part of the living being that allows it to defend itself from dangers and threats, or requests based on religions, creeds and beliefs. All of this can have a bad outcome, because when you want it, you wait for that desire to fit with you, but it really won't, otherwise you would have already done it, and for that desire to be as you say, it usually comes Disguised in another way, when desiring, you obtain a facade that superficially falsely covers that need, but is accompanied by problems, other needs and other negative elements for the desirer.

People often fall into the trap of desires based on tempting promises or superficial desires. These desires usually come in disguise and, when fulfilled, reveal their true face, bringing with them additional problems and needs. It is common to try to modify elements or even emotionally lobotomize living beings to force a fit, which leads to a long-term feeling of resignation at having found what one intended to find, however, that search, that longing is not what really It fits, it is similar to tying something or someone against their will, a way of enslaving and being enslaved at the same time, both by a desire, an ambition, a longing, an obsessive attraction. Normally, there is a constant desire to want to create something, achieve something before others, or enjoy the exclusivity of a moment, an object, an event, a person, etc., based on the need expressed and the quality expressed, or the aspect emitted, due to sensory memories and appreciations of their stimuli, craving elements that cannot be obtained, and that if one insists on it, one usually has to resign oneself to, or have it in a form that does not please really to the desirer, or not to have it. Having a need that implies a desire which seeks what it believes fits into one's life normally initiates external searches, but it is really better not to search, since otherwise, if it were a congeniality, a connection would be felt from the beginning. and from within, and no attempt would be made to establish a connection as such. To do this, a close-up façade is shown in the senses that leaves a strong impression and causes the person to believe, without the possibility of resorting to critical thinking, that it really is that and why it is that, due to the constant sensory or multimedia bombardment. by Panoptes Digital.

Human consciousness is affected by sensory stimuli, multimedia content and audiovisual elements being a powerful tool to insert desires and artificial searches, however the most complete is music, since it is one of the fastest ways through its cymatic, establishing “emotional fits”, that is, mutations in the mood and mental state. This influence leads to confusion between genuine desires and needs, creating what is called "artificial congenies", failed attempts to replicate what is known to fit into one's life, but with inappropriate or incorrect elements. It is common to confuse a desire with a need that is congenial to oneself, and many times artificial congenies occur, attempts to replicate what is known to be congenial in each person's experience, but is configured or created with inappropriate elements, or through inappropriate manner. Desires can turn against one another since one normally believes that something with which one has no prior connection is necessary to one, so one seeks to obtain it, but after the fulfillment of that desire, one suffers its implementation by force of that which is not congenial, and one tends to reject or get bored of that quickly manifested desire, longing for another better or more complete element to replace it, or different from it by hating it.

When something really suits you or your life, you feel a connection, you perceive a connection beforehand, timeless and non-spatial, whether through intuition, direct or indirect knowledge, or other terms. Those people inclined to the lower areas of consciousness search for desire and resign themselves to it, since it satisfies them in the first instance and that gives rise to another search for a greater desire, and so on. The pursuit of desires and congeniality can very rarely occur, it is not impossible, but it is excessively difficult for it to occur, and it is called "chance", "miracle" or "luck", but normally congeniality and desires are different , because congenie is based on that which predeterminedly fits with a living being, that which is made for one, prophesied, predestined, and desire is the manifest expression of the living being to seek that which it believes fits with it. Human beings regret not being able to grant the wishes to other human beings that they pursue, however, when we know that this is congenial or not with that person, when we know that this may or may not harm them, we try to avoid it, and That results in conflicts sometimes.

It is common for desires to not align with what truly fits into one's life. Often, the pursuit of desires leads to an endless sequence of unsatisfied desires, since they tend to bombard and exploit people's needs so that they try to obtain what they believe is really worth it, when in reality it is a trap for the desirer. , and a subtly dirty way of getting something at the expense of others through the wish-giver. True rapport is felt from the beginning, without the need for explanations or demonstrations, and is manifested in a multitude of cases, such as instant loves, pure brotherhoods, indelible family ties, or the most powerful friendships, instant or slow connections that bring depth between people, or even skills that are virtuously mastered without prior experience.

Human beings, carried away by desires, sometimes seek to obtain what they desire over what really fits them. However, this leads to a loss in the end, where desires become mere vestiges of what congeniality truly represents. Therefore, active and forced searches distance one from their true being, since they avoid what truly fits. When you search for a wish, it is similar to making a pact with a demon, carrying out a magic spell, or even raising the dead from their graves, they are interferences with the natural course of the Anabasic and Catabasic forces themselves, and that interruption has as a consequence the superficial obtaining of the desire, which masks a “scolding” or a lesson hidden through a deliberate mismatch. The dilemma of desires and congenies is whether to put before what suits a living being in favor of the expressed desire, or to evade desires, be patient, wait and obtain what really suits one. When something clicks with someone, no explanation is needed in any way, no way to reaffirm that feeling, it is known, just like love at first sight, the connections between people who seem to have known each other all their lives, or the strange naturalness and virtuosity that occurs when wielding or practicing a skill without having had previous experience with it, eternal friendships, family ties indelible by the barriers of time or other forces, but it is normally made to appear that desires are the predominant force, and it is usually suggest “seek, pursue and obtain them with effort or cunning”, an indirect way of directing the person in a direction far from their familiarity and bringing them closer to something that has nothing to do with them, promising a better situation if that is achieved, a higher status, almost as if through marketing, desires are usually offered as suppliers of needs, however, even if it comes true, it does not supply, it only gives the appearance that it can supply. You can desire whatever you want, there will even be people who tempt the need by giving what you have sought so much for, but it is not really worth it. In any case, that person will have benefited and the desiring individual will have been deprived of something. When something belongs to the Congenie it is noticed, felt, perceived, understood as something of one's own and of individual belonging, and it usually happens in explicit intimacy or unexpectedly. And in the end wishes are just vestiges, memories, distant echoes of what Congenie really is. That is why forced active searches do not make sense or work, because in that same process, one moves away from what really is for him. In Metaphysics, the laws of attraction and other similar elements are usually mentioned, that thought is what attracts, but it is not so much about this. In this case, it is the element

something that is connected to you, like Japanese beliefs. Expeditions of desires elude what fits you, so it is better to “let it flow,” allowing life to process events as they come, without interrupting it or one or the other.

In metaphysics, it is proposed that thought attracts, but beyond that, it is about finding what is connected to oneself, something similar to the Japanese belief that everything you have ever interacted with has a meaning. connection with us. Expeditions of desire deviate from what fits, so instead of searching, it is wiser to let it flow, allowing life to process events without forcing or interrupting the natural course of things.

#anabasis #catabasis #dualism #essay #katabasis #mesobasis #philosophy #ensayo #filosofia

[onewomancitadel]

Am sorry if am emotionally insensible however I do think it would be really funny if the last thing I were ever right about in RWBY were Raven's return. Take that Jung and eat it

#seraphina ruminates over V9 #raven anabasis theory

[cyrus-the-younger]

this is a Tissaphernes hate blog if you didnt know

#im sure yall all know this #but #im reading the anabasis rn so i needed to say it again

[universalcaffination]

Tos books that share kirk being a nerd have my soul

#kirk gets off the bridge after a shift and has a couple of hours? #time to read an actual book (rare in tos bc of the nuclear war of 21st century earth): the anabasis by xenophon #mega nerd (affectionate)