I think the people complaining about AFOs back story have forgotten what his character represents.
He’s a manipulative rich old man that wants to own and monopolize every major resource in the world so that he can be considered a god.
His entire being is a metaphor for major corporations and every politician and billionaire ceo ever… so him being a narcissistic and greedy kid isn’t at all surprising. He doesn’t have a traumatizing backstory because he’s a manipulative power hungry chump like he has been the entire series.
179 notes
·
View notes
Tattoo session officially booked for Sept 2!!! Had the hour long in person consult this morning, artist was super sweet and seemed genuinely really excited to do the project. It's a full day (8 hr) session so it's not the cheapest, but not unreasonable given artist experience, selected style, HEALTH AND SAFETY STUFF, time spent on design, etc
Like I am so fuckin nervous and almost threw up this morning but the artist was SO kind and lovely and non judgemental, of this goes well I'll want her to do my whole half sleeve tbh
38 notes
·
View notes
i keep forgetting how long ago mark’s dyed hair was
i clicked on a video from 4 years ago and he doesn’t look all too different from how he looks now
you guys he hasn’t had dyed hair in 6 years
and his dyed hair phase only lasted like a year and a half
i could’ve sworn his hair was dyed for so much longer than that
7 notes
·
View notes
I made a roast. It’s got soft potatoes and firm carrots (carrots in all forms are my fave root veggie ever it’s all good to me lmao) and roasted but still firm broccoli, which to me and dad is like. Perfect. This is the perfect meal. Im just really proud of myself cause I have a tendency to overcook the meat (which to most of you would be burnt beyond saving but honestly I like anything that is past medium rare lmao I’m One Of Those People) while the potatoes are still firm in the middle which is my least fave potato, lol.
Anyways. I also posted a 12k Marvel fic where Peter (not movie verse lol) brings Bucky back to the tower less than two weeks after CAWS:
10 notes
·
View notes
i always tell myself NOT to look at notes, but i can’t help it when i see that something apparently has over 1k notes— and for a second im like “:D” until i realize the actual details of that number.
1k is just likes (and AGAIN this is tumblr, likes don’t mean anything)
100 are actual reblogs
and, well this is the worst offender really because I found myself actually counting,
20 of those reblogs actually have yknow… fun tags which is what I actually am able to see and feel some sort of interaction with.
So yeah. I really shouldn’t actually look at the number of notes to any post at all.
3 notes
·
View notes
Thinking about image model generated art and gifmaking is giving me some weird vibrations about how there really is some weird association of the virtuesvirtues of a medium with the virtues of the people working in it. Gifmaking being associated with KPop fans doesn't make the concept of frame interpolation racist, and someone marketing themselves as a cheaper alternative to some other artist doesn't make the concept of generative art inherently class antagonistic.
It's somehow reminiscent of CJ the X's distinction between "stupid art" and "evil art", how a medium that has a low skill floor can produce things that are very stupid and easy to perceive as low-effort but how that's not the same as them having something wrong with them. If you look at my animation tag, most of it is motion graphics done with AfterEffects, and while it's probably wrong to call it a low skill floor program the way an AI art generator is... there is still a world where instead of programmatically telling shapes to whizz by on a screen, a different Van would have drawn those same animations frame by frame, producing exactly the same animation.
And I don't think the fact that I did them programmatically somehow invalidates the artistic intent that went into them, y'know? I could open AE right now and produce a 250x250 looping gif of clouds and while I know how to do that quick, to make it look good and to make me like it, I would have to spend time considering how the various elements, colours, timings and whatever the particle system/noise generator I use spits out fit together. I would have to fiddle with seeds and levels and timings to make it look good. I would have to spend a long time just staring and thinking about what I'm making before I could make it good.
I don't know enough about generative art tools to know how much fiddling goes into them once they're taught and ready to go, but I do know enough about deep learning to know it's a haphazard, frustrating process that you as the artist have only limited control over, which is why it doesn't appeal to me. But I have made gifs in the past, and I know how that process requires an eye for consistency and composition, framing and colour that a lot of other visual artists don't have because they're not working with time as one of the creative dimensions.
And like... who am I, from my high horse as someone in possession of these skills, to tell someone who is still developing these skills or who has a different aesthetic concept of what is good than me, what they're making is low-effort. That's not my judgement to make. I didn't make it. Only the artist themselves can say if somehing was low-effort or not. I don't see why I should have so little faith in other artists to assume they have no interest in putting in any effort.
6 notes
·
View notes