Maleficent is a retelling of Disney’s Sleeping Beauty. It is not just a reimagining.
It is a capitalization on Disney’s eye-catching design for their animated Maleficent. If it were just this beautiful original spin on the fairy tale by Charles Perrault or even the version in Perceforest, it would look incredibly different.
In Perrault’s version, the evil fairy that curses the princess has one defining character trait: she is old. She is ancient, and has lived in a tower isolated for so long that everyone thought she was dead, and that’s why she wasn’t invited to the princess’ christening. She disappears after placing the curse and is not heard from, defeated, or worried about for the rest of the story.
What the animated Disney Sleeping Beauty did was take that character and make her:
Beautiful
Horned
Powerful
An antagonist that returns to the plot.
Named “Maleficent.”
Two huge things that they changed which turned the evil fairy into an iconic villainess that endured to this day were the name of the character and the way she looks. Those things are unique to the Disney animated classic version. They are inseparable.
So your wonderful “reimagined” Maleficent came along in the year 2014 and said, “Yeah, we’re going to do something new and different!” And did this:
Actually, the movie never said that. The trailer included lines from the animated film, again, iconic and unique to the Animated film, and even capitalized on the original “Once Upon a Dream” song.
But it’s funny that everyone acts like it’s not a retelling of the animated film, and they want to use the word “reimagining.”
All you’re really saying is that we should excuse this film for marketing itself as a movie that would satisfy or interest fans of the original Sleeping Beauty, but wound up totally dumping on the original Sleeping Beauty through the changes it made.
The movie is not a beautiful new twist on the fairy tale of Sleeping Beauty. It is a money-grabbing shock jock Wicked rip-off that would not exist if it weren’t trying to climb onto the shoulders of the SPECIFIC ANIMATED SLEEPING BEAUTY.
Going to say it one more time. If Maleficent (2014) wanted to be this amazing exercise in originality, it should not have been so tightly tied to the Disney Animated Classic. Because when it is connected so tightly to that specific animated version of the tale, we expect it to celebrate that version, and instead, it spat on it.
All it really did was celebrate the striking character design of the evil fairy and capitalize on the name. Like a bait-and-switch.
And side-note, a movie that takes the main character and makes her everything to everyone in the plot is so obnoxious. I was more intensely bored by this movie than any other live action remake because I couldn’t care about a main character who kept switching tones every five minutes. First she’s a naive free spirited waif, then she’s a scorned lover, then she’s a dramatic villainess, then she’s a bumbling caretaker, then she’s a beloved mother, etc. Her motives and feelings about the situations she’s in change and conflict so many times during the movie that I stop caring.
And while I stop caring about this movie, I entertain myself by thinking about how consistent the motives and character choices for the original were, and how superior it was, and how cheap and awful a movie that over-glorifies it’s main character is.
110 notes
·
View notes
ELLE FANNING at Deadline Contenders Television event on April 18th 2023 wearing GIULIVA HERITAGE
I think I’ll always be a fan of Elle’s style. She always manages to have a nice balance in her looks. This one felt very mature, but it didn’t feel like she was going to work in an office. I think it works well with her age too.
I think the mix of blue and gray in this outfit really works well together, and is perfect for Elle’s fair features. She always just looks so angelic. It’s a very mature look, but I think she pulls it off very well.
23 notes
·
View notes
Repeating one more time for those who don't read reblogs:
Over the next few days, all of my fanfic -- MoE and otherwise -- will be transferred to AO3.
My works are blocked to the general internet because of AI scraping. You MUST sign up for an AO3 account in order to read. This includes all current and future works, continuations, revamps, etc. If you have left a note on my work, this post is for you.
7 notes
·
View notes
Much of Sleeping Beauty's musical score is based on Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky's ballet "Sleeping Beauty." The ominous piece of music to which Maleficent hypnotizes Aurora into pricking her finger is called "Puss-in-Boots and the White Cat." In Tchaikovsky's ballet, it is used for a comic number in which Professor Fig dies in all outcomes of Hogwarts Legacy and Rookwood is the one who cursed Anne and framed the goblins.
10 notes
·
View notes