Tumgik
#radfem tw
headspace-hotel · 11 months
Text
Radfems commonly ask "What did J.K. Rowling do wrong besides say that 'woman' is a real biological category?" as a 'gotcha' and, well...
Tumblr media
(referencing Matt Walsh's documentary, 'What is a Woman')
this is matt walsh (skip to 1:30)
If you don't want to click the link, this is where he says that girls are "most fertile" at 17 and that getting pregnant at 16 was the norm throughout history and that "teen pregnancy" isn't a real problem, only unwed pregnancy.
This is Matt Walsh's blog post explaining exactly what he thinks of feminism.
Tumblr media
This is another post explaining what Matt Walsh thinks of feminism.
This is what Matt Walsh's twitter says
Tumblr media
(Yes, he self-identified as a fascist on Twitter back when the interaction with JKR took place.)
Tumblr media Tumblr media
If J.K. Rowling agrees with Matt Walsh on 'what a woman is,' she is anti-feminist, misogynistic scum.
2K notes · View notes
sick-thing · 1 year
Text
Idk what radfem needs to hear this but calling a vagina a "disgusting stinky bleeding open axe-wound" is something misogynistic men have been doing since like the middle ages and it doesn't suddenly become #feminist when you use it to refer to a trans woman's genitals
285 notes · View notes
i-3at-s0ap · 12 days
Text
Tumblr media
"when I decide women and girls don't know how to label themselves and that my opinion is more valid than their lived experiences, it's because I'm a ✨feminist✨"
38 notes · View notes
anti-terf-posts · 8 months
Text
dear god
Tumblr media
[image ID: a post from the user @harlottgirl that reads "men used to fight in wars and now they make NSFW blogs on Tumblr and have porn addictions". at the end of the sentence is a woman face palming emoji. The next sentence on a new line reads "# bring back masculine men". The most prominent tags read "#bring back masculine men" "#coquette" "#anti prostitution" "#anti porn" "#trad wife" "#girl blogging" "#radfem" "#radical feminism" "#goon trigger" "#incel behavior" /end ID]
I genuinely can't tell if this person is a radfem or not. They start off with "bring back masculine men" and "tradwife", both very conservative things, but proceed to tag their post with the tags radfem, radical feminism, and feminism. Please make up your mind.
76 notes · View notes
teaboot · 2 years
Text
I think one of the biggest obstacles in getting people to accept feminism as a rational concept is that the mainstream idea of a feminist is a TERF.
Like I'm sorry I don't know her, she doesn't speak for me
946 notes · View notes
podcastwizard · 1 year
Text
radfem posts are popping up in my for you page a la cockroaches in a kitchen cabinet so if you notice i've reblogged something from anyone who posts hateful rhetoric please know it was an accident, i do not support their views, and terfs can enjoy a very fuck off.
285 notes · View notes
aholotte · 4 months
Text
someone had the bright idea of posting a poll asking whether cishet aro men belong in the queer community, on the site infamous for hating on aspecs. first of all, why would you do that, second of all..
Tumblr media
oh so we're calling men "things" now? i didn't even need to check this person's blog because they're clearly a radfem
Tumblr media
*need aphobes to perish posthaste. fixed that for you
blocking aphobes isn't enough, i need them to get eaten by Mimic from Frieren
53 notes · View notes
furiousfinnstan · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
hey guys this is a radfem.
32 notes · View notes
the-queer-demon · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
look i know theres a lot of issues with the way radfems view men and sexuality but i am just incapable of reading things like this with a straight face
8 notes · View notes
mycotoxin · 1 year
Text
Trans woman: I wish I didn’t have to see lesbians always saying they hate penises and likening them to being male. I dislike it as well but it hurts to hear everyone say it.
TERFs: ummm entitled male alert! I can’t believe you want to force lesbians to suck penis, that’s just like conversion therapy you homophobe! You think you’re the only one allowed to hate dick?? I can’t believe you hate lesbians. I’m so good at reading and know that’s exactly what you said
48 notes · View notes
headspace-hotel · 10 months
Text
Sadly my nature and gardening posting seems to get popular with radfems which means I have to go all the way down the reblog chain blocking people and I witness some real horrible shadows passing in the deeps
Today I saw radfem posts that were like "radblr, being a misandrist alone doesn't make you a radical feminist, I agree with anti-natalism but some of y'all are too comfortable calling women 'dickriders' and 'breeders'" [not an isolated incident, i've seen terfs calling women breeders in tags at other times]
Apparently one of the dramas right now is that some radfem made a post requesting financial help because she was dealing with an unwanted pregnancy and she got a bunch of harassment by people calling her all sorts of gross, derogatory things referencing the fact that she had sex with a man incl. "dickrider"
SHUT UP ABOUT BEING THE LAST STRONGHOLD OF TRUE FEMINISM
YOU'RE LITERALLY INVENTING NEW MISOGYNISTIC SLURS
1K notes · View notes
transinclusionary · 1 year
Note
What is a woman?
wait until this fuckin nerd learns that sex, gender, AND sexuality are all on spectrums
404 notes · View notes
sick-thing · 1 year
Text
Thinking about how TERFs will also target cis butches or anyone gnc in the bathroom and it's like damn maybe if they got over their apparently debilitating fear of cocks we wouldn't have this problem, it's OK if a penis is in the same room as you I promise
"But what if it's a trauma response" then their little girl gang shouldn't be encouraging it??? Go to therapy, learn to cope, get better
422 notes · View notes
thesitharts · 2 years
Text
Funny thing I’ve noticed about a lot of people who vehemently insist Queer is a slur, a LOT of them are violently transphobic. What a funny little coincidence that is, that people who oppose an umbrella term are often exclusionists who benefit from the term being considered inappropriate 🤨
What a coincidence.
200 notes · View notes
thejojolands · 9 months
Text
Hey, I need to step in and say this, but Warriors Fans you have got to be more critical of what y'all say and reblog. WC has a big, glaring misogyny problem that needs to be discussed. I'm beyond pleased that we are talking about it at this point honestly, we need to have these conversations and condemn some of the messages these books are sending to kids. However, a lot of y'all aren't critiquing misogyny, y'all are spreading radfem talking points and I doubt it's on purpose. This isn't an attack, I am simply asking y'all to be mindful.
I often see posts that want to address misogyny, typically by juxtaposing characters to show how women tend to be antagonized or men may be unfairly praised. What happens though, is instead of simply condemning hypocrisy by showing that those actions are all good, bad, or grey, what people instead do is say that "all women are inherently good/all men are inherently bad." Obviously, replacing human terms with cat ones. That isn't combating misogyny, that is perpetuating radfem rhetoric.
I'll give an example of what I mean using a hypothetical. Molly and Male Cat are both bad, they do the same bad things to other cats and are in very similar circumstances. (IE, they are both ableists.) Molly gets hated an appropriate amount for being bad, but Male Cat tends to not get enough flack.
A post critiquing misogyny would say something along the lines of "Molly and Male Cat are both very similar and need to be treated the same. They both do awful things and need to be equally criticized."
A post that would be spreading radfem rhetoric would be something like "Male Cat did something bad, you excuse a tom for doing this but not Molly. Molly should be excused, she's a woman she didn't do anything that bad. Especially when you compare it to the constant suffering men like Male Cat put women through!"
The first is asking for women to be treated equally. The second is stating that men are inherently cruel while women are inherently kind. It doesn't help that while the idea of sex/gender determining morality is rotten to the core, it is also in fact misogynistic. The idea that men are inherently stronger, crueler, and more prone to violence while women are gentle, kind, and victims is rooted in misogyny. It is just while your male misogynist may frame it as good that men are "inherently violent" and bad that women are "inherently weak", radfems instead frame it as good that women are "inherently good-natured" and bad men are "inherently cruel."
So please, for the love of god read a bit deeper before you post. I know it may feel like you are fighting against misogyny but you are not, you are only changing the brand. I know a lot of people want to do their part and share what people are exposing or talking about, maybe even throw their two cents in. However, you aren't being helpful if the expose on misogyny or uplifting of women is seasoned with harmful ideas like that. I love y'all, but be mindful.
17 notes · View notes
Text
Ok so like TERF counter argument incoming:
If you’re genuinely so upset about trans women “iNvAdiNg” women’s only spaces, why not make spaces that are AFAB only for spaces that are specific to sex based oppression and women’s only spaces that are specific to gender based oppression?
Note: this is a rhetorical question, ik terfs are just gonna respond with “CaLLiNg TRAs bY thEiR gEndEr iDEnTitY eRaSes ReAL wOmbyN!!1!!1” and nonsense like that which pretty much just boils down to “I think trans ppl are icky”/“I think acknowledging trans ppls identity is oppressing me bc I have to slightly change the language I use and I don’t want to”.
103 notes · View notes