Getting Rid of the Sokovia Accords
In the DisneyPlus streaming series, “SHE-HULK: ATTORNEY AT LAW”, the MCU finally got rid of the problematic Sokovia Accords when attorney Matt Murdock aka Daredevil revealed the Accords had finally been repealed. Considering my six-year criticism of how the MCU had introduced this legislation in “CAPTAIN AMERICA: CIVIL WAR” (one of my least favorite MCU films), utilized it in productions like “AGENTS OF S.H.I.E.L.D.”, “ANT-MAN & THE WASP”, “THE AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR”, “WANDAVISION” and “THE FALCON AND THE WINTER SOLDIER”; I was very happy to learn this about the Accords’ fate.
However . . . I find myself questioning Disney and Marvel Films’ latest decision regarding the Sokovia Accords. I have problems with its repeal or eradication. I have a problem with how Disney/Marvel Films got rid of it - via a throwaway line. For years, MCU showrunner Kevin Feige tried to tell us that there were two sides to the Sokovia Accords. I had called bullshit to that idea due to my belief that the Accords violated the U.S. Constitutional and the constitutional rights of enhanced people overall and not just the Avengers.
I had hoped that the MCU would get rid of the Accords by exploring the issue of how the Accords violated the rights of many. But the franchise never did this. Instead, the MCU rid itself of the Accords with a quick line - one that would enable the franchise to avoid discussing how WRONG the Accords were in the first place. All I can say is . . . Feige and the Disney suits are a bunch of cowards.
129 notes
·
View notes
i genuinely want the mcu to end so badly. the whole "every movie takes place in the same universe and they're all connected" worked well in the earlier days, but now it just hurts the quality. i would have loved to see what an ant-man 3 or a doctor strange 2 could have been if it didn't need to put aside its own identity in service of furthering a larger story. and as the release schedule gets more and more crowded, it just gets harder and harder to remain invested in literally anything.
245 notes
·
View notes
Saying that media, literature, and artwork isn't political is anti-intellectual ideology meant to silence minorities and artists.
57 notes
·
View notes
the music and film industry specifically the latter in light of the recent news about spiderverse prove once again that passion and innovation do not get rewarded under capitalism, they get exploited.
recently, a handful of animators came forward to share their story about the working conditions on this movie. allegedly they worked 11 hours a day, without a day off. 77 hours a week. they were treated like machines.
capitalism is inherently coercive. it sucks everything out of the workers. their energy, their creativity, their worth. under capitalism, you, as a worker, have no leverage over your labour. if you have the guts to quit, you'll potentially be risking everything and you will be replaced by someone else who needs the job.
as much as I ADORED this movie, i cannot stand for this and I will not be able to enjoy beyond the spiderverse clean of conscience, especially if they are able to release it on its scheduled release date. the animators created a masterpiece. they deserve the recognition and love for their work. the circumstances under which this movie was crafted were inhumane and abusive and under the current promise of releasing the sequel in less than a year the situation can only get worse.
no amount of pay will ever justify 77 hours a week. art cannot be rushed. if we continue to only praise this masterpiece without criticising the people on top who take all the profit for themselves and exploit their workers, it will prove to them that ultimately it was all worth it and consequently, these actions were okay.
if the release does not get pushed back, I will have no other choice but to boycott spiderverse next year and i encourage you to do the same. if you really love these movies, its the least we can do.
83 notes
·
View notes
I hope after the writers strike the CGI creators will go on a strike too. Firstly, because they need to, and second it will piss off so many people and so many MCU stans.
83 notes
·
View notes
I just watched Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 and I felt like it really solidified one of the reasons why Endgame just did not work in my opinion which was that none of the characters whose stories were ending in that movie actually got a proper send-off that was focused on them. This is because, in Endgame, everything was taking place in the midst of a much larger story where a major goal was still to set up future storylines and ultimately to try to give partial or equal focus to a really unreasonable number of characters. I always hate on Steve’s ending in particular and while I do definitely think it was a majorly poor choice for his character in general it was also just really rushed and didn’t make sense given the pretty minimal amount of time that was allocated to his character in that movie, whereas if Steve had gotten to go out on a final Captain America movie I’m sure it would have been much more likely for him to get an ending that actually aligned with his arc as a whole and within that film. Plus, characters that are so well established deserve to get a real conclusion that is focused on them! And it worked so well in GOTG3 to actually have that but I couldn’t believe it when I realized that this is the first time in the MCU that a series has gotten to end in that way. I feel like it really goes to show how much this type of franchise storytelling wrecks character arcs more often than not because the priority is always the bigger picture rather than the individual story, and I’m happy Guardians got to end in this way but the other characters should have gotten that too :(
43 notes
·
View notes
You know, I wasn't going to say anything, but considering I came out of the movie with barely anything I liked, I gotta say Thor Love and Thunder is hot garbage. And is not queer positive, is not feminist, is not friendly to trauma and cancer victims and is very much the parody it's predecessor was, no, even more so the parody.
And at this point I doubt the director has any actual progressive bone in his body. And that's that.
245 notes
·
View notes
MCU’s Biggest Problem
It is time for the MCU to get rid of the Sokovia Accords. NOW. Ever since its debut in “Captain America: Civil War”, it has done squat for the franchise. Writers for the franchise have either mishandled this narrative device in movies and television shows like “Civil War”, “Ant-Man & the Wasp” and “Marvel’s Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.” with sloppy or implausible writing; or have completely ignored it. Worse, moviegoers are still expected to believe that an accord is a law (it’s not). I get the feeling that Kevin Feige, writers Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely, and the writers for “Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.” and other MCU projects do not know the definition of “accord”. Also, Feige and his writers, along with Mutant Enemy and its writers have failed to grasp that the Sokovia Accords is basically a violation of the U.S. Constitution, something I had immediately knew six years ago. Are fans of the MCU really expected to believe that it is okay for any government to strictly monitor, harass or imprison people from a certain group, due to the actions of a handful of individuals from that particular group? Isn’t that a form of bigotry? Are you telling me that Kevin Feige, Marvel Films, Disney Studios and the Mutant Enemy production company are advocates of bigotry after all? If not . . . find a way to finally get rid of the Sokovia Accords.
48 notes
·
View notes