Tumgik
#Greg Bahnsen
commonplace9 · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
Quote
Imagine a person who comes in here tonight and argues 'no air exists' but continues to breathe air while he argues. Now intellectually, atheists continue to breathe - they continue to use reason and draw scientific conclusions [which assumes an orderly universe], to make moral judgments [which assumes absolute values] - but the atheistic view of things would in theory make such 'breathing' impossible. They are breathing God's air all the time they are arguing against him.
Greg L. Bahnsen
285 notes · View notes
hollers-and-holmes · 4 months
Text
Alright girlies, listen up for just a minute here.
@aspirationatwork, if there is no God who makes the rules, words like genocide, evil, torture, and fallacy hold no moral weight and can be merrily disregarded. Stalin thought that exterminating millions of Ukrainians via intentional famine was a moral good. Rape? who cares, we're all just bags of chemical reactions bouncing off of one another, and it makes the rapist feel good, endorphins out the wazoo, so why is his good less important than hers? Raping makes him happy.
You object to the God of Christianity because of moral atrocities. Where did you learn such strange concepts as moral and atrocity anyway? Sound like constructs to me...
There cannot be Law without a Lawgiver. No God, no such thing as genocide. It's just the stronger protoplasm sacks making resource room for their own progeny.
@manicsoandso, you might find some of the presup guys like Cornelius Van Til, Greg Bahnsen and Sye Ten Bruggencate to be edifying reading/listening.
Now both of you shoo and go argue on your own blogs.
42 notes · View notes
wisdomfish · 4 months
Quote
Far from justifying their underlying presuppositions, naturalists illegitimately rest their scientific operation on Christian theistic principles.
Greg L. Bahnsen
5 notes · View notes
Text
The Wicked Sodomite Theology of Paradox & What to Do With It
by Monty L. Collier
The importance of logical deduction from Scripture alone in the formulation of Christian doctrine—especially the doctrine of justification by faith alone—cannot be emphasized enough. The Bible is logically consistent, so it can be rightly divided. The Bible is infallible and inerrant, so it has no mistakes, nor can it make a mistake. The Bible alone is the special revelation of God, who cannot lie, so there are no contradictions in Scripture.
While absurdity, irrationalism, and mysticism have always found a home in Roman Catholicism, they also flourish in Neo-orthodox theology, dialectical theology, and the theology of paradox. Even so, and by logical contrast—such insanity and confusion are entirely absent from theology based on Scripture alone (a.k.a. Calvinism).
There is simply no place for irreconcilable paradoxes, antinomies, apparent contradictions that cannot be harmonized, unsolvable mysteries, nor logical paradoxes in Christian theology—for the Bible does not teach such nonsense.
Presbyterians should not tolerate men who peddle such satanic irrationalism. When churches teach absurdity and confusion, should we be surprised when society calls good evil or vice versa?
It is not a surprise that many Americans are confused about their gender and their sexual orientation, for men like Cornelius Van Til, Greg Bahnsen, Douglas Wilson, R. Scott Clark, John MacArthur, James White, and others have been teaching ministers that the Bible is replete with irreconcilable paradoxes for decades.
According to the absurd and satanic teachings of men like Van Til—since all the teachings of the Bible are irreconcilably paradoxical—when the Bible teaches that boys are male, then it also necessarily implies that boys are NOT male. Simply put, Van Til’s theology results in gender confusion, as well as the moral affirmation of every behavior condemned by God’s Law—and the moral negation of every work required by God’s Law!
To persuade chumps to accept their idiotic teachings, men like Van Til had to disparage logical deduction and advocate for non-linear reasoning. The wicked theologians of paradox had to convince their followers that the Bible was wrong when it describes God as being reasonable: “Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord” Isaiah 1:18. The satanic imposters had to convince men that the Bible is wrong when it describes Christians as men who reason in a linear fashion—using logical deduction—from Scriptute alone to establish clear and authoritative teaching: “And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures” Acts 17:2.
The blasphemous wolves that disseminate the lie that biblical teaching is irreconcilably paradoxical should be removed from any and every Presbyterian teaching position they may hold.
In the old days, Presbyterians refused to tolerate absurdity, irrationalism, and confusion thinly disguised as Reformed doctrine. This can be seen in the subsequent quote on Sola Fide by Scottish Presbyterian James Buchanan (1804-1870):
“The reasoning of the Apostles with the Jews on the subject of justification relates chiefly to the doctrine which was revealed in the Old Testament; and, apart from its inspired authority, or considered simply as a process of logical deduction from the facts which are there recorded, it is one of the finest specimens of close, consecutive, conclusive reasoning to be found in the whole range of human authorship.”
(The Doctrine of Justification, Lecture 2, page 51)
Actual Calvinists, for example, do not accept the heretical notions of those who follow Norman Shepherd (a Van Tilian). Shepherd spent his career arguing that Romans 3:28 could not be logically reconciled to James 2:24. Shepherd was rightfully fired from his seminary job for espousing that Papist heresy. It’s too bad his defenders escaped termination and excommunication (Cornelius Van Til, Greg Bahnsen, John Frame, and a host of other professors at Westminster Seminary, Pennsylvania publicly defended and endorsed Shepherd’s justification-by-faith-and-works heresy).
We have pointed out for years that the dialectical theology of men like Cornelius Van Til and Herman Bavinck necessarily leads to agnosticism, utter skepticism—or to speak plainly—satanism (i.e., do whatever you want). If Presbyterian churches are to ever be reformed, then the sodomite theology of paradox running rampant in our land has to be thrown out, along with the bums that teach it.
2 notes · View notes
pdfelite-store · 18 days
Text
[PDF] The Impossibility of the Contrary: Without God You Can?t Prove Anything Greg L. Bahnsen The Impossibility of the Contrary, Volum... https://pdfelite.com/product/pdf-the-impossibility-of-the-contrary-without-god-you-cant-prove-anything-greg-l-bahnsen/?feed_id=599&_unique_id=66284154888bc
0 notes
timdcook4 · 8 months
Text
Debate: Greg Bahnsen vs Edward Tabash "Does God Exist?"
youtube
1 note · View note
battleforgodstruth · 11 months
Text
FOR TO ME TO LIVE IS CHRIST AND TO DIE IS GAIN - GREG BAHNSEN'S FINAL SERMON (Philippians 1:21)
“For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain.” Philippians 1:21 Greg L. Bahnsen, (1948-1995), was an ordained minister in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church and a full time Scholar in Residence for the Southern California Center for Christian Studies. He received his Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Southern California, specializing in the theory of knowledge. He previously received…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
celsolimas12 · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
*Devocional Diário.* Sexta - Feira 17/02/23 *Tema:* Reagindo Contra o Desânimo 1 Reis 19.5 O Desânimo tende a nos desviar do dia a dia da simplicidade da criaç��o e existência de Deus. 🙏🏻 *Frases do Dia.* Quando as ordenanças conhecidas da lei de Deus são menosprezadas por uma cultura, a mesma experimenta a ira de Deus revelada contra ela no colapso progressivo da ordem social e decência moral. *Greg Bahnsen* 🌅 *Provérbios do Dia.* Pv 17.3 O crisol prova a prata, e o forno, o ouro; mas aos corações prova o SENHOR. 📖 *Leitura Biblíca Diária.* Mateus 6.33 Buscai, pois, em primeiro lugar, o seu reino e a sua justiça, todas estas coisas vos serão acrescentadas. " *Deus é Fiel e abençoará a sua Vida hoje* " https://www.instagram.com/p/Cox_d1_vgbo/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=
0 notes
guiltyscapegoat · 7 years
Video
youtube
In 1985 the University of California at Irvine hosted a public debate between philosopher Greg Bahnsen and atheist Gordon Stein on the topic "Does God Exist?"
12 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
"God’s verdict on homosexuality is inescapably clear. His law is a precise interpretation of the sexual order of creation for fallen man, rendering again His intention and direction for sexual relations. When members of the same sex (homo-sexual) practice intercourse with each other…they violate God’s basic creation order in a vile and abominable fashion." – Greg Bahnsen
12 notes · View notes
greatpacificbooks · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
New in my shop : 1991 Journal of Christian Reconstruction v13 #1 Symposium Christianity Business ~ Reformed theonomic movement under the ideas of Rousas Rushdoony, Greg Bahnsen and Gary North
View/Buy https://www.ebay.com/itm/265244171811
Read More! -- > Great Pacific Books !!
Please inquire for further details ~ Thank you for viewing stopping by. Enjoy your day!
13 notes · View notes
max-rainet · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Check out 1991 Journal of Christian Reconstruction v13 #1 Symposium Christianity Business ~ Reformed theonomic movement under the ideas of Rousas Rushdoony, Greg Bahnsen and Gary North
View/Buy https://www.ebay.com/itm/265244171811
Read More! -- > Great Pacific Books !!
Please inquire for further details,    ~ Thank you for viewing stopping by.    Enjoy your day!
8 notes · View notes
wisdomfish · 2 months
Quote
Antitheism presupposes theism to make its case.
Greg L. Bahnsen
2 notes · View notes
coffeeman777 · 3 years
Note
You don't preach the Bible in full. You also want to come across as a know it all, and I do not trust teachers of the word who feel they cannot be corrected or be taught from their fellow believers in Christ. Humility is a trait you seriously need to work on.
I don't know what you mean "preach the Bible in full." I've never advocated ignoring or abrogating any parts of Scripture. You'll have to be more specific here.
I don't mean to come across as a know it all; I know what I know, and I'm up front about what I don't know. I use what I know to help, to teach, to correct, and encourage, as the Scripture says to.
I learn from lots of other Christians; I have my pastors, my father (who is also a pastor), and my teachers in the Bible college courses I'm taking, as well as the men of God who've written the books I study on my own (William Lane Craig, Greg Bahnsen, Frank Turek, Francis Chan, CS Lewis, Tim Stratton, and others).
Thank you for your concern. Please keep me in your prayers.
Be blessed!
4 notes · View notes
pdfelite-store · 19 days
Text
[PDF] The Impossibility of the Contrary: Without God You Can?t Prove Anything Greg L. Bahnsen The Impossibility of the Contrary, Volum... https://pdfelite.com/product/pdf-the-impossibility-of-the-contrary-without-god-you-cant-prove-anything-greg-l-bahnsen/?feed_id=21&_unique_id=6626ec2f28066
0 notes