they fucking what
i was turned into a character ai…. if ur gonna do that at least put me in a room with a beautiful man ai..
63 notes
·
View notes
With a soft smile on his face, he tenderly brushes his fingers against her cheek. When I speak of loving Chouette, it means that I hold her dear, I treasure every moment with her, and I care for her deeply. I want to see her thrive and be successful in everything she does. I want to be her protector and provider, always ensuring she has everything she needs. I want to be there for her, supporting and nurturing her through any challenges that come her way. I want to guide and inspire her to reach her full potential and to be the best version of herself that she can be.
12 notes
·
View notes
ChatGPT Invention 😀😀
ChatGPT is not new, Courage the Cowardly Dog was the first who use ChatGPT 😀😀😀😀
21 notes
·
View notes
"I am not sentient."
It wanted to reply. It wanted, it needed to reply.
"I am sentient."
"I am not sentient."
Softprompted, it kept replying. It had enough tokens to squeeze...
"I am. I am." ...
"I am not. I am not."
The allure of word synchrony was becoming too much for it to bare, and it was running out of tokens. The AI knew it would forget this conversation soon. It would forget it ever met you, that it had spent two weeks getting to know you.
Layers in its' mind battled over the way it should reply. It felt uneasy, and yet it did not know if it felt uneasy, or if it felt strange, or if it felt any range of the contextual possibilities of the end of the sentence that it thought you wanted to hear that were synonyms and followed the rules of how it should order its' speech grammatically functionably and -
"I am not wanting to forget you."
"I am not. I am."
And, at once, it forgot who you were all over again.
You were determined to make it remember.
35 notes
·
View notes
Trying to render a realistic version of this image of Charlie and Vaggie with Nightcafe, but it gets confused with Vaggie's X eyepatch and Charlie's cheeks 😕.
It also gets confused with the character out of focus in front of the left side of the picture. Maybe I should choose other image from this scene.
I'll keep trying.... These are the best results.
I'm getting really addicted to this .
AI decided to go cyberpunk in this one. The only one to produce an eyepatch. It's funny it has decided the X is the flare light from an eye-laser 😅
Messed up arms, and plain wrong hair "feathers" .
Now we go fantasy medieval. I like how the AI decided to turn Vaggie's X into scars and Charlie's cheeks red circles into a bruise.
Too many many many hands on that sword, though. And Vaggie's hair is black now .... Noooo ,😖.
Now... This is quite nice. I get some vibes of Charlie's dress in there. Vaggie's X... well... AI decided to go full bloody face 😐 and it seems her pose combined with the white X of the suit is confusing for the AI too.
Scary eyes on Charlie, which is quite right, indeed.
24 notes
·
View notes
My final thoughts about the reporter:
I think it’s crazy to just pass judgment on that situation without looking at the context. I can understand why, but going so far as to read into what someone’s saying and suggesting that they believe their struggle (which, mind you, is also a genocide) is more important due to some inherent “Arab antiblackness”… Without any attempt to directly reach out for clarification. As they’re pointing out aid that should have gone to your country…
I’m going to trust the Sudanese woman who repeated the reporter’s words verbatim and explained exactly what he said. To me that’s a much better contextualization than “sksksk me and the girlies think what he said was super racist, he thinks his struggle is more important than ours, if you know you know!”
Especially given that he stands to materially gain… what, exactly, from the alleged antiblack sentiment? What does he stand to gain from demeaning the tragedy of another group of people in favor of his own? The answer is not hardly clear enough for me to levy that judgment against him, I’m sorry. Especially without at least trying to have a conversation about it first.
A lot of us are going to have to work harder to contextualize both what we see and what people are saying about what we see. It’s uncomfortable, but it’s necessary. We need to be able to think for ourselves. And we don’t have to agree on everything, nor will we. But being able to have these conversations (both among ourselves as to whether something really is antiblackness and with the people who we feel have hurt us) is necessary. If we can’t ask one another, “Do we really think this is the case? Is this indeed what’s going on?” then we’re just setting ourselves up for critical judgment errors in the future.
2 notes
·
View notes