Do you guys think that when the Avatar dies and it’s announced, the nation who expects the next avatar has some sort of baby boom? Is the avatar soul connected to a child born the same day the former dies, or does it take the 9 months for the next avatar to be born? Does raava know who they want to choose for the avatar, or is it a lottery for them too?
I know they don’t really find the avatar until they’re a little older and can do the test (like toddler age based off TLoK), but it’s kind of a good reason for someone to even try for a kid. How many fake or hopeful, naive parents claim they had the avatar? What’s the benefit of lying you parenting the avatar if it’s so easy to prove them wrong????
Is it even announced when the avatar dies or does the white lotus (or whatever organization looks for the avatar pre-Aang) keep it a secret so theirs no conflict??? Was there a baby boom in the water tribe after Aang went missing? The southern water tribe definitely had a boom before Korra (however, it may have been northern WT people migrating south, or the south was a scattered nation and got a chance to grow and unite). How many water benders died during the hundred year war because the fire nation thought Aang died and a new avatar was born?
I hope the next avatar series goes into that because I have so many questions about the times between Avatars and the logistics
25 notes
·
View notes
...okay, so I'm probably not the first person to notice this.
But gear's earing that he points towards when he says that he did the same ritual he wanted to help kuro with already on himself before:
actually looks pretty similar to the pieces of the necklace the count used to create the servamps:
The different pieces of the necklace seem to contain one demon each and the count used them to create the servamps.
So...did the count either learn this technique from the werewolves or is he possible even originally a werewolf himself? It would explain why he's immortal, that's why I'm wondering about this.
Gear says that the ritual is used to remove spirits, could it be that the count removed his own sins using the werewolf ritual and created the demons this way? But he went too far and removed too much unlike gear who only removed one part of himself? Him removing the sins from himself would also explain why he's so weird and doesn't understand other beings. As the sin demons say, they are a natural part of being a human and we have seen multiple times that denying their existence is harmful, removing them all from you would probably lead to you not being able to relate to other people anymore.
Maybe removing all these parts of himself is also why he has no appearance. Without his demons he's not a person anymore.
The count originally being a werewolf would also explain why he has magical abilities (gear can also use magic) before other magicians existed and why he's so anxious about certain people dying. Gear talks about how his immortality makes him sad because human friends do die, but unlike the count gear seems to accept death, grieves in a heathier way than the count and is able to move on and make new friends. Could also explain why his magic and creations are all strongly tied to the (full) moon.
Another similarity is that while werewolves apparently can't reproduce gear was able to have descendants by sharing his life force (it's mentioned in chapter 135 which isn't translated yet) with a woman and through her human children tsurugi is related to gear. Sigurd explained to nicco that the magicians came to be because the count let humans drink his blood, three survived, got magical ablities and became the ancestors of all human magicians:
Maybe the count is more of a werecat though. He and the sloth demon do seem to have a closer connection, even though the count's appearance changes depending on the person looking at him he does usually keep his tail and the tip looks exactly like the one of kuro's cat/lion form and similar to the the one of inner sloth's non-human form.
It was also stated multiple times that the sloth demon is the strongest. I wonder why that is. Servamp comments on the fact that being lazy is often actually a sign of depression/anxiety through kuro's arc, so maybe the count was depressed and that's why the sloth demon is the strongest? Basically the demons strength depends on how much the count suffered from the different sins? It would also explain why melancholy is so strong, I assume kuro refusing to see him no matter how many siblings he sent his way to tell him to come looking for the count made him extremely sad and probably even made him come up with the plan to have himself be killed and then put in the same body as kuro through the ritual.
I assume he was behind C3 ordering the servamps to kill him because he's the one who created the magicians and thus C3 and lily who is kind of working for him was probably the one who put the idea that the count needed to be killed into the head of his eve (aka a member of the alicein family who hold a lot of power in C3 basically since the beginning. I explained this in more detail in another post). The people from C3 even said that the count can only be killed if he wants to and yeah, kuro didn't truly kill him, but he did destroy his body and kuro seems to have met little resistance when he attacked the count. Which probably means the count wanted this to happen.
63 notes
·
View notes
Your perspective on Byler is super interesting, thank you for these posts! I agree that Byler isn't queerbaiting, but what if it's still an accident in the sense that they intended to tell a story of unrequited love from Will's pov (like Steve/Nancy, or Dustin/Max in season 2), and this is what those shots of Will between Mike and El are for, and didn't realize that Mike could be seen by a part of the audience as queer and possibly loving Will back?
Okay, for the most part, I'd just be reiterating the post I already made. So let's narrow this down to something more specific. Why is it not like Steve and Nancy or Max and Dustin?
Let's look at Max and Dustin first. I'll make a post about Steve and Nancy later because this wound up being longer than I meant for it to be.
What first comes to mind with Max and Dustin is the moment it really ended. When Dustin saw Lucas and Max together in the junkyard. If Dustin and Max were similar to Mike and Will, parallel to them, then the moment Dustin saw Lucas and Max together in the junkyard would be the same beat in their stories to the moment Mike and El reunited in the desert.
However, take a look at how they're shot.
This, versus
This.
And, just as important...
This scene.
AND this scene.
As I said in my first post, the reunion scene is shot that way--with Will making direct fucking contact with the camera--because he's supposed to be the one you're paying attention to in that scene. Not El and Mike.
Likewise, you're supposed to be paying attention to Dustin's feelings in the shot where he's watching Lucas and Max, but you'll notice some key differences.
One, Lucas and Max arriving together is shot as significant, as the focus, before it shifts to Dustin's reaction, instead of Dustin's reaction being shoved INTO their arrival. There's an over-the-shoulder shot to show that he (and Steve) have noticed Lucas and Max arriving, but the focus is still on Lucas and Max, reiterating what the audience already knew, that they're blatantly going to be The Couple, as was made pretty clear by their previous scenes, which brings me to the next point.
Their previous scenes. Their previous scenes. Lucas and Max had previous scenes leading up to that moment in the junkyard. THOSE--Lucas filling Max in, showing up at her house, convincing her to sneak out so that he can prove that everything he's been telling her is true and winning her trust, and Max giving him at least that much benefit of the doubt--were the real equivalent to El and Mike reuniting in the desert (isolated from Will). You want the audience to care about a couple? This is what you do. You give them private moments. And I was truly remiss in my first post not to point out that...Jonathan and Argyle were also there. So was fucking Brenner. Why didn't we see them? Why was the scene shot in such a way that you briefly forgot their existence but Will Byers was staring into your soul? You know why.
Getting back on topic, the final piece of the puzzle here is the scene that followed Dustin accepting that Max liked Lucas and not him. Once more, Lucas and Max have a private, tender scene. Emphasis on private. Once more, we get them alone. They talk, get everything they have to say out in the open, and only once the conversation comes to a lull does the story move on.
You know what the equivalent scene would be for Mike and El? Well, you've got one of two options, and neither is great for them.
First, you have Mike in that scene where he makes the glasses and he starts to say something to El but immediately gets interrupted by Argyle throwing pizza on the table, ker-splat.
And second, you have the infamous "I love you" scene. Which they are emphatically not alone in. Famously, Will starts that conversation in the first place, and his face is hovering over Mike's shoulder the whole damn time. (Again, this could have been shot in ways that made us forget he existed for a little while, and the show decided not to do that.) But, I really must impress the importance of this...
EL. AND MIKE. WERE NOT. EVEN. IN. THE SAME SCENE. AT ALL.
They weren't even in the same place! Not consciously, at least! Sometimes the camera would show El on the counter and it'd be, like, the tip of her nose and a little bit of her brow, but that does not count. That's like showing the phone in a phone call. Her body is basically an inanimate object that only allows verbal communication at this point. Then who was phone? EL WAS PHONE.
Okay, outdated memes aside, my point is that this is not how romantic scenes work. There are things missing, things wrong, and things very present in places where they should be absent. And the creators clearly know this because those are the rules they've laid out before and the path they've followed since. Mike and El never had any private, intimate, romantic scenes in season 4, despite having them earlier in the show. This is carving out the trajectory of their relationship moving forward. It is a vector, it has direction and force, and it is going straight toward the bitter end.
So I guess this is mostly about why El and Mike aren't happening than why Will and Mike are. Which is only part of the equation, true enough. To play devil's advocate here, maybe it's possible that the result is that El goes on to be happily single because there's so much more to life than stupid boys, Mike lets go, and Will pines for the rest of his days. Sure, whatever. Possibility, I guess.
One thing, though.
You wanna know who did have private, intimate scenes before and after the desert reunion?
Ya bois Michael Wheeler and William Byers, that's who.
Edit: I meant to say one more thing that I'm just realizing I forgot to mention. Dustin's face while he was watching Max and Lucas was clearly visible while Will's is not. We can see HIM, but not his FACE. This is like placing a wrapped box in the middle of the kitchen table and saying "Do Not Open Until Xmas". We're gonna unwrap that later.
39 notes
·
View notes
Um, medical side of Tumblr, weird question. But does any one have any experience where they've been able, just by thinking, no other outer stimulus, to make themself feel cold, followed right after by a warm sort of tingling rush all over, mostly centered in the chest?
I kinda started doing it as like, a coping mechanism to feel better during depression cuz the warmth would feel good, but it has occurred to me that perhaps I should...not be doing that...if its gonna like, affect my heart or something :s
27 notes
·
View notes
Are we not going to talk about the fact that Rudy survived aiming a gun at Soap in Ghost’s presence? Red laser sight and all. Even had the time to take the shot.
Granted, he got a knife thrown at him, but Ghost wasn’t trying to hit him; he wouldn’t have spoken and wouldn’t have hit the wood several inches away from where Rudy’s head had been if he was trying to hit him. And if Ghost had been trying to kill him, Rudy would be dead.
This happened right after the Alone mission. Ghost had to be still tense from that. Tense because of the realization that he was sick with worry about Soap when he was out of sight and in danger where Ghost couldn’t get to him. Tense because, even though Soap was alive and with him now, they were still surrounded by enemies and he had to make sure Soap stayed alive.
Ghost was in full soldier mode, relying on his battlefield knowledge and instincts to get Soap and himself to safety.
So tell me why he didn’t aim to kill when he saw that flash of red? Why did he give Rudy the benefit of the doubt before he knew it was Rudy? Was it because he was operating on the assumption that anyone in the safe house would likely be friendly? If so, why did he throw the knife at all? Precaution? Don’t aim to kill because it could be a friendly, but throw the first punch in case it isn’t? But if it was an enemy, the knife that he wasn’t aiming to kill with wouldn’t have stopped the enemy from taking the shot.
So what was he doing? Could he really just not handle Soap being in anyone’s sights and reacted before he thought, not aiming to kill because it was more likely to be a friendly? Was he hoping the knife would startle whoever it was enough that he could determine who it was? Give him the time to pull his gun if it was an enemy?
He had to be thinking. Thinking of some plan or other because he doesn’t do anything without thinking it through all the way, from every possible angle. There was no way he was just reacting, no matter how the red dot on Soap’s body made him feel.
I, evidently, have so many questions. I need to know what was going through his head.
371 notes
·
View notes