lipton is just so. consistently the best guy around. yeah boy, remember to get your life insurance... first to sign his resignation as an nco because he's loyal to his men not to rank... gets hit trying to get the men to leave a zeroed area. dragging luz into the foxhole, always being the first one out of his. yelling to stay down and take cover. don't trash-talk our incompetent c.o. who runs when the fight breaks it's bad for morale. it's hard being a replacement officer with the toughest most professional and dedicated sons of bitches. oh hey malarkey, didn't i hear you say you wanted to bring a luger home to your kid brother? compton how are you holding up? doc heads up we're gonna need you soon. i'll draw the sniper's fire for you shifty. always right where he's needed. oh, you mean it's me who's been holding easy company together? i'm just trying to make myself useful despite having pneumonia sir
im sure you've talked about this before but what are your opinions on hilbert
hilbert is... a fascinating character. he's an archetype disguised as another archetype, concealing a real person with understandable motivations and sincerely held ambitions. in a way, that's very reflective of how his work has been hollowed out and warped with each iteration of himself he becomes to continue it. hilbert is an insidious type of evil, because his goals are noble and he doesn't enjoy hurting people, but he will carry out orders and rationalize his actions "for the greater good." which makes him an excellent foil for eiffel; hilbert is nothing if not a Big Picture thinker. "you talk about helping people, but what about the real, live people around you?" / "increasingly, i find them to be of negligible importance." etc.
i think it says a lot about wolf 359's character writing philosophy that hilbert's betrayal and big reveal is really kind of his first character moment. he's there for two seasons after that, but he's never redeemed, and his goals never change. what makes hilbert more complex, more real, more understandable, is entirely perspective.
and the tragedy of hilbert, i suppose, is that he sacrificed everything for what he believed was right, sold his soul to the devil for it, and then... wasn't even particularly good at it. he's a big fish in a very small pond, as far as wolf 359 antagonists go. his death virus was never going to be anything but a death virus, and cutter figured that out (and found another use for it) ages ago. in change of mind, he was so certain he had the right answer - of course it was the scientist, his work was threatened - and they wouldn't have made it out if not for fourier, who realized it was really about human relationships. in am i alone now? hilbert's part is the only one where no one else speaks. before he dies, jacobi cuts his comms line, and his final words are a cut off "can anybody hear-?"
so, again... hilbert is a narratively and thematically significant character. this is barely even scratching the surface of that. but do i like him? hell no. absolutely not. he tried to murder hera and then said "tell me you're not mourning that appliance" so i think it's fine that he died, actually. that's how i judge all wolf 359 characters.
And the shapes that you drew may change beneath a different light, and everything you thought you knew will fall apart, but you’ll be all right | Nandor the Relentless + Constellations by The Oh Hellos
the thesis of this video can be boiled down to this: Nandor is, fundamentally, a man who is struggling to cope with the realisation that while he has stayed the same for years, the world around him has been changing without his say so. he clings to what he's always known - for example his image as a relentless warrior - and the boxes he's put people in, without realising that these things don't quite fit him anymore. and when he does start to make an active effort to make a change, despite having every good intention, things rarely work out for him because, often, what he's seeking out in new places, he actually already has. all he needs to do is look around himself and see things in a new light to realise it.
(this vid only uses footage from the first 3 seasons btw, you don’t need to be caught up with the latest eps to watch it)
i have a lot of thoughts on minos in relation to pasiphae and the minotaur (both greek mythological and in ultrakill) but i dont really want to make a lot of posts abt it considering. the topic is generally hard to talk about.
here's the thing about matthias: he isn't the honorable, reformed hero some of the fandom seems to see him as.
yes, he was raised by a tight-knit family of comrade soldiers and decides to betray them in the end. of course that took incredible strength. i don't deny that. but we also need to recognize that the drüskelle are not just some rogue cult. they are a core part of the fjerdan government, who is trying to wipe out the grisha because they are seen as dangerous. that's literally just genocide. however indoctrinated someone is, this is something that is evil from every angle, even if the character can't or won't see it.
and look, i love a good redemption arc, but matthias is such a passive actor in his. he falls in love with nina against his will. she changes his attitudes toward grisha because she's beautiful and kind so all grisha can't be bad, right? this a classic example of the trope of separating the "good ones" from the rest, where you cherry-pick specific individuals to point to as exceptions to a group's nature, which is still implied to be evil. you have to do a lot more than fall in love to truly unearth and address the roots of bigotry.
tbh, this is my biggest critique of the books as a whole. i loathe the "love conquers all" trope that pairs together a character from the oppressed group and one from the oppressors, letting the one show the other through the power of love that being bigoted is not nice. it puts all the responsibility on the former to prove their humanity, and gives all the credit to the latter's ability to be persuaded to recognize it. and then it inevitably leads to forgiveness, because the character has "earned" it by changing their views, once again making the victim seem like the villain if they don't absolve the oppressor of their past "mistakes". also, it's incredibly unrealistic for someone to fall in love with a person who actively hates them and considers them sub-human. in real life, people have to work on their bigotry before that happens, not use the relationship as a plot device for character development.
i think the idea of writing a character like matthias is neat. i think portraying someone's struggle to throw off the suffocating, hateful dogma they've been fed all their life is a story we need more of. i think personal growth of this variety should be celebrated, because otherwise people would never change. but i don't think the people, fictional or real, get to do this without facing profound consequences. it is not enough to feel sorry. it is not enough to apologize. it is definitely not enough to fall in love. and i think writing that lets people off the hook like this grossly oversimplifies power and oppression, and ends up being a feel-good way to romanticize people who cause a lot of harm.
a last note: my opinion is 100% influenced by my being bipoc. matthias is a classic aryan supremacist, even if being aryan isn't the thing he's being supremacist about. my gut reaction to that type of character is always going to be mistrust, both because people in real life have given me reason to be mistrustful and because characters like these are often written in a way that makes you sympathize with oppressors. i don't think matthias earns that trust, and i don't see why i owe him my affection as a reader.
actually logged into this account for the first time in a week i hope nobody said anything funny in the tags of our posts in the past week because i will Not be going back to read everything
hi kipper thank u for stopping by the askbox!!! :3
5. Estimate of how much of your art you post online vs. the art you keep for yourself
i think i probably only post 10% of my art at most...? there's a bunch of things i don't post because it's mostly studies (lines only, for the most part).
i really enjoy breaking down images of objects to boxes and cylinders, or draw objects from different angles (i have a few page dedicated to squiffer and how to hold it, for example)!
there's also a few pages examining and notetaking on art styles that interest me because i like seeing how they use shapes/lines and proportions...
and for anything "bigger" that i'm really invested in the outcome in, i tend to accumulate a few pages of poses/studied related to the thing before actually drawing it... because i hate having to look up references mid-illustration 💔
i think most of the things that end up being closer to finished (colored) end up getting posted in some shape or form, though, whether if it's to friends, my toyhouse gallery, or my social media...!
11. Do you listen to anything while drawing? If so, what
in regards to music while drawing... sometimes i will listen to the same song for an hour (or 30 minutes). more hours if i'm crazy (10 hour coconut mall and beneath the mask im looking at you). or i'll do a mix of different songs, usually music from persona 4, splatoon, and other video game osts that i like. or k-pop. lmao.
more often than not, i end up "watching" videos while drawing so i'll have splatoon tournament sets/scrims/x rank in the background, or whatever games i'm interested in watching (shoutout to pikmin 4)... or when friends screenshare things to me (i love when they do that)