Hey Second! As the resident vault hunters fanatic, I was wondering if you or any of your followers had links to Joe’s vh streams on youtube. It seems like most of them have been unlisted and I missed a lot of them live so I only have about half saved. The older streams are reaching the 60 day mark where twitch deletes the vods. Im hoping that they’re not just lost to the void
i'm so sorry, i don't have the links--i mostly watch joe on twitch, so i don't have the old youtube links saved :(. if anyone else has them, i'd love to see them, but if he's been unlisting them i'm not really sure what to do because he normally does that intending people won't watch them (his final hermitcraft 9 stream was immediately unlisted and deleted on twitch and i KNOW he does that when he's planning on making something mostly episode content and doesn't want to take away from that but GOD THAT HURTS I WISH I'D KNOWN HE WAS GOING TO DO THAT SO I COULD DOWNLOAD IT, it hurts my HEART when stuff like this gets lost, i swear, like, that one has genuinely upset me for real).
anyway i suspect the vault hunters streams are being unlisted because they've largely been turning into episode content, and he wants people to watch the episodes instead, so you can at least get a large portion of the streams from those, but like... man.
if anyone has the old links in their youtube history and they HAVE just been unlisted and not deleted, please let me know so anonymous--person can archive them! that'd be really nice!
52 notes
·
View notes
Ohh, I have such a weird mix of feelings about Mudd's Women.
Going into the rewatch, I was like "oh no, it's this one". But actually, I really like it as an episode?
Idk, even though it seems quite sexist, and there's a fair amount of cringe, and I do not like the ending of Eve staying with That Man, I kind of feel like the women are the main characters, and the joke is on the men?
And I really, really do like Eve; she's such a great character. She knows what she wants, mostly, but is also a bit of a mess, understandably - and she very much is her own person? (until the end, which, ugh. why.)
Like, it's not a good episode, but it's not as icky as I thought it was?
(Also, Spock smirking as he introduces "Leo Walsh" to Jim, knowing that Kirk's going to be completely unprepared for the ladies 😅)
6 notes
·
View notes
Ngl, I really think that these bylers that are crying 24/7 about "purity culture" or whatever, are playing dumb when they start with their "but Nancy and Steve were 16 and 17 in that scene of s1!!!1" like... We got introduced to these characters at that age and the people playing them were already adults. So yeah, sorry but I think it's easy to see why most viewers would be uncomfortable with a more sexual scene of Mike and Will and it's not automatically homophobia, I think that would be the case with any of the kids since we got introduced to these characters when they were 12 and the actors were babies as well. We literally saw those kids grow. And I'm not saying byler should only get to peck or hold hands, It'd be cool if they have their epic kiss or whatever, but Will hasn't even had his first kiss yet and some of these people are already talking about sex scenes, like... Be for real 😭
funny you should say that...because i've used the nancy was 15-16 in season one argument (last tag) before while also saying that i understand why people find the sex part of their sexualities uncomfortable to discuss. and i wanna reiterate that, again, i totally understand that people feel like they've seen them grow up etc etc and that they still think of the actors themselves as children even thought they're not anymore.
i don't think it's all homophobia because like you said, people would probably feel the same about lucas and max and discussions of sex (i don't know if anyone is discussing that because there's much less discourse to have there and you can't argue that people are homophobic if they disagree with you) but i don't think it would be justified either. the "but we knew the characters when they were little" argument makes me think me of an ancient disney channel/abc show that old people and girl meets world fans who watched it for the first time in the 2010s will know, boy meets world (1993-2000). classic comic of age show, look at these kids. and eric in the back (he's fifteen).
they're eleven at the start of the show and then, what happens in any coming of age story happens, you guessed it...
they grow up. this is them in the later seasons, when the main characters are still in high school i think. they grow up, they talk about sex and about having sex at prom in season five and then they don't have sex right away because they figure it's not the right time yet or something like that, and then they have sex later and get married, the details don't matter. but my point is, who watches a show for five seasons, over years and years and gets upset at the main characters having sex because "this is crazy they used to be children"? isn't that the point of coming of age stories that cover multiple years or that focus on the latter years of adolescence, that they're not children forever and that at one point the characters "come of age" which usually includes their first sexual experiences?
i don't think the having sex part is particularly important in stranger things but also it doesn't have to be for it to be portrayed (see jonathan and nancy), teenagers have sex, it's just the way the world works. i'm not advocating for sex scenes of any kind especially because stranger things isn't a show that features a lot of sex in general, the only "explicit" sex scene being nancy and steve in season one with cuts to barb dying, but i genuinely don't think the duffers would have any qualms about portraying teenage sexuality in general with the party. if they did, they wouldn't have included erica threatening lucas to tell dustin what she found under his bed (it wasn't the communist manifesto) and they wouldn't have had max looking at a shirtless steve for an amount of time that's supposed to make the audience laugh. it's been 7 years. if they do a time jump, the babies will be about 17, played by actors who will all be around 20, the age natalia was when filming season one. the characters are teenagers, babies grow up. it happens to the best of us. i get why people would find it uncomfortable and maybe i would find it uncomfortable too but i wouldn't be scandalized. the duffers had no problem having a child actor portray everything will goes through in seasons one and especially two, i really feel like sex is fine and...not traumatizing or hard to watch compared to every single thing will's gone through lol. and again, i'm not even expecting them to have sex lmao, but i wouldn't cry myself to sleep if they revealed that everyone in the party actually knows what sex is.
last question: do we have any indication that jonathan had talked to more than one other girl (the girl at the halloween party being the one girl i'm counting for him) before he got together with nancy. i'm just asking because of your last sentence, because if we don't he should have slowed down also😭
26 notes
·
View notes
Things I need to see now that the Gear 5 episode is out
Luffy gear 5 Fanart with his strawhat as a halo (I didn't see any so far and I might go crazy if nobody does it)
Edit with Sonne - Rammstein (his literally a sun God, pls I'm begging you)
Edit with GMFU- Odetari (I've just been into Odetari lately and think it would make really fire edit)
More criptid gear 5, and religious themed fanart (I'm a sucker for those kind of fanarts)
Thank you for attention
15 notes
·
View notes
Last night, I had dream I received TFA Soundwave, a little similar to episode 10, season 1, yet not quite. He was smaller though, like toy robot size. Anyways, I was trying very hard to convince TFA Soundwave to not join Megatron, and to fight it. Alas, I didn't win, and I woke up upset. I thought about it throughout the day 🤔
5 notes
·
View notes