thinking (and rewatching..) inside job again and i dont think rand is that bad of a father? i mean, he made a lot of mistakes and he doesn’t even feel bad ab it, even tho he traumatized reagan and a lot, but he was never absent. he acts like he cared ab reagan’s career just bc it could help his career, but that’s not true. he pushes her to be the best all the time and it’s bad, but he genuinely cares ab her so much. and the whole ‘creating crises to force her to hang out w him’ thing is fucked up, but it’s cute that he just wants to hang out w her that bad. most fathers literally don’t care enough ab their kids to do any of that. most fathers don’t even know their kids as much as he knows her. maybe my standards are just insanely low, probably, but he’s a better parent than 90% of the parents i know
13 notes
·
View notes
“so sad being a harry potter fan/jkr stan and a transphobe pick a struggle” ok but how’s it a struggle? ?? because weird losers i don’t know will try to bully me on the internet ??? y’all are just smug because you were nobody in high school and now you feel like you win at life because you have internet clout from tweens and perverted adult men plus the duds who jumped on the bandwagon because they have zero values and beliefs of their own …. like stop projecting i promise no one gives a fuck that you’re “different” it’s still annoying and your green shaved head and mushroom tattoo aren’t punk or even really that cool at all….get a grip fr …anyways i’m gonna struggle by A) being objectively right and B) enjoying my childish stories that have no shortage of material (and more on the way!) to keep me entertained
4 notes
·
View notes
So I saw a post about the whole Maths being taught in UK debacle that, while the article is was showing was clearly ridiculous, made it clear people don’t understand the issue and why British people (including myself! Hello!) dislike this whole “teach maths until 18” thing. So here’s the deal:
In England at least (not sure about the rest of the UK it’s probably similar), once you turn 16 you have four options: A-levels (exams for academic subjects), BTECs (qualifications for non-academic subjects), apprenticeships/diplomas (practical skills focused on specific jobs) and going into work. At this point, there is very little you do that you don’t actively want to do. Further education is a lot about choice and making the decisions about your future.
So once you’re at this level, you can decide to never study a subject ever again. I decided never to study dance, PE or geography again because I hated them, and for a lot of people, they would have decided never to study maths again. And that’s fair, at this stage we’re all Adult Lite and deserve a say in what we learn. At A level/BTEC you typically do 3-4 subjects, and diplomas/apprenticeships have you choosing one.
(Although some subjects will still pull in parts of other subjects you dropped and some diplomas will have you sit remedial lessons for subjects like maths and English if you scored poorly in them to bring you up to speed).
The problem with “everyone needs to learn maths until they’re 18” is that that really detracts from the choice, freedom and enjoyment of further education. It’s also a problem that the government is not saying “We need to assess secondary education to see where the failings in teaching maths is and provide funding and assistance to ensure all students get a good handle of maths by the time they leave secondary school”, which would be the reasonable and actually helpful thing to do for students. Instead, they’ve decided “Let’s take either free time or study time away from related subjects and the freedom of choice away from students”.
If you despise maths because you’re bad at it, being forced to learn it for two more years in an education system that needs help and not ridicule and punishment is not going to improve anything, except change your plans on what further education you may take to avoid this mandatory maths.
26 notes
·
View notes
Just todoroki dark choco and zuko
I never got far with My Hero, I was only at like the beginning of the Overhaul arc, so I can only judge Endeavor based on everything up till then (I heard he might have improved somewhat later on?), but again, it’s just Dark Choco being like “are you two okay??”. Especially since like, these two are teenagers while he is an adult
8 notes
·
View notes
the school district i went to high school in is currently in hella drama bc they’re trying to detrack math up until 7th grade and all of the AP students, alumni that went to ivy leagues and white parents are shitting their pants bc they “don’t want school to be dumbed down” aka they don’t want themselves/their kids to stop feeling special and have to be in classes with dumb brown kids* i’m sure . anyways so many of them are like “i believe in equity but—“ so you don’t . also they’re like if you do this people are gonna send their kids to private school!! like ok good riddance
3 notes
·
View notes
pulling my hair out at people my age talking about how easy their jobs are and their £13/hour part-time, underage wage while I stick my hand in containers of mustard and get harassed by bar staff for the measly minimum wage </3
1 note
·
View note
I have no concept of numbers in kpop. everything reaches the millions so I just have no clue what’s actually popular. the boys will reach 5 mil preorders and I go oh cool but then the next post will say “they’re the first group to do that” and I go oh cool, because it just?? preordering albums is a new thing, streaming is a new thing, it really doesn’t hold much weight to me so I just have no clue what any of it is supposed to mean. I don’t know what the average amount of preorders is so how am I supposed to be impressed w 5 mil -.- among other records
4 notes
·
View notes
ok random thought: so I’ve been seeing little snippets of alyson stoner’s “dear hollywood” podcast which is about child stars and what they call the “toddler-to-trainwreck” pipeline. and it’s just got me thinking about some things, and I think I’ve reached the conclusion that i’m not against children acting, but I am against child stars and the concept of “child stardom”.
so let me explain: I don’t think that we should remove under-18s from every movie or TV show. I think that, if done properly, a kid or teen being on a movie set can be more like an after-school drama club rather than a job. I think that kids on film sets should have multiple safeguards and adults looking after them, and I think every effort should be taken to make sure they’re treated like kids and not adults. so if all of those are in place, then I have no problem with kids acting.
it’s the child stardom, in my opinion, that’s the problem. it’s when kids are made into stars, whether they sing or act or whatever, that puts them in danger. when they’re put on the pedestal that a lot of people put celebrities on, when they’re being overworked, when their parents keep pushing them to do more and not caring about them as people, that’s when we run into problems. cause when kids are continuously pushed into doing audition after audition (rather than doing 1 or 2 jobs over the course of their childhood) that’s when they get overworked and do auditions that are inappropriate or potentially traumatic. when kids star on Disney shows or release “wholesome” music, that’s when they go wild not because they’re “bad” or anything, but they’ve been forbidden from behaving like a normal teen/young adult (honestly it’s similar to kids with overly strict parents). when kids have all eyes on them growing up, they crack under the pressure, because hey, ADULTS can barely handle celebrity.
and yeah I get that certain acting jobs require more public eye than others. but if the diary of a wimpy kid kids could be protected and have fairly normal lives, then more could have been done for the harry potter kids. it’s not impossible.
so anyways, I hope this post made sense, just organizing my thoughts.
5 notes
·
View notes