#AI in art

[catgirlknighted]

AI generated hentai, smut, and nsfw art is literally soooo boring. There’s no soul behind it. You can tell the artist didn’t get distracted mid-drawing and start touching themselves to their work. It just ain’t the same. Also fuck AI & automation that hurts artists and takes away jobs!

#just saw AI generated work on here and it just felt so wrong to look at; absolutely disgusting #AI #ai in art #rose.txt #minors dni

[kundst]

Is this art?

Without an explanation that is not a question. But if I tell that this drawing was made by Artificial Intelligence program DallE, the question becomes different.

Arnoud van Mosselveld using Dall E with the input: Landscape, pastel, hills and Brett Whiteley-style. This is one of the 4 pictures Dall E generates.

Jan. 28 2023

#dall e #artificial intelligence #AI in art #brett whiteley #2023 #pastel

[r0semultiverse]

I’m of the mindset that if you defend AI covers of songs that you should just instead say you hate voice actors.

Say you hate us and never want us to be able to make money with our voices.

Say you hate the sex workers who do phone stuff for a living.

Say you hate people making money from their own voices and you want us to be homeless among other things.

#and I’ll continue to stand on this hill #because that’s exactly what y’all are saying #you’re just putting a more candy coated language over it to try to seem like an innocent little consumer #if you defend/use AI then you’re no friend of mine #mine #OP #ai song covers #AI #ai in art

[silentwisher-feed]

Playing With Ai Image Generation - Episode 2

Welcome back to the second installment of “Playing With AI Image Generation,” where I continue my exploration of the exciting nexus of artificial intelligence and art. This episode once again features Leonardo AI, the remarkable AI platform that’s redefining the contours of digital artistry. Witness as I harness its potent capabilities to create everything from breathtaking digital vistas to…

View On WordPress

#Advanced Image Generation #AI and Creativity #AI Art Generation #AI Art Tutorial #Ai Image Generation #AI in Art #AI in Design #AI Tools #AI-Assisted Art #Artificial Intelligence #Digital Art #Digital Creativity #Exploring Leonardo AI #Future of Art #Image Generation #Leonardo AI #Machine Learning #Silentwisher #Silentwisher Entertainment #Tech Exploration #Tech in Art #Technology in Art

[hexdecimal-ai]

#ai styled #ai hunk #ai artist #ai image #ai in art

[azimuthalis]

Good news, fellow artists! Nightshade has finally been released by the UChicago team! If you aren't aware of what Nightshade is, it's a tool that helps poison AI datasets so that the model "sees" something different from what an image actually depicts. It's the same team that released Glaze, which helps protect art against style mimicry (aka those finetuned models that try to rip off a specific artist). As they show in their paper, even a hundred poisoned concepts make a huge difference.

(Reminder that glazing your art is more important than nighshading it, as they mention in their tweets above, so when you're uploading your art, try to glaze it at the very least.)

#anti ai #anti ai art #nightshade #artists on tumblr #posting on tumblr for awareness! #fuck ai art #ai is theft

[tagedeszorns]

This machine kills AI

#AI isn't art #fuck ai art

[apostate-in-an-alcove]

Oh damn the Catholics have joined in on the war against AI "art".

#anti ai #anti ai art #ex catholic #catholic #game over guys the catholic church is onto your bullshit lol

[persephinae]

://www.dreamstime.com/ ://www.freepik.com/ ://www.craiyon.com/ ://stock.adobe.com/ ://storybird.ai/ ://www.dinosaur.org/ ://pngtree.com/ ://creator.nightcafe.studio/ ://www.123rf.com/ ://lumenor.ai/ ://neural.love/ ://www.vecteezy.com/ ://openart.ai/ ://www.artpal.com/ ://generativeai.pub/ ://promptbase.com/

Block these sites in your uBlock Origin so you won't see that shit in your searches

#fuck ai #art resource #block ai

[animentality]

#twitter #hayao miyazaki #anime #studio ghibli #ai art

[catgirlknighted]

There are entire blogs dedicated to posting AI generated hentai & porn. I’m not one to kink shame, but if you get off to AI stolen content I’m 100% shaming you. You have no taste and also that’s probably a SWs boobs used without permission so just fucking stop.

#this is the one hill I’m standing firmly on no matter what #AI generated art SUCKS and you honestly can’t even call it ‘art’ #AI in art #rose.txt

[redstonedust]

yknow AI art has ruined an entire genre of painting to me, i saw one of those smooth anime-realism pieces and immidiately thought ''ugh, AI art'' until i noticed it was posted by an established deviantart user 6 years ago. like ive never been a huge fan of that genre but it looks like a pretty difficult style to master and i feel bad for the artists who specialized in anime-realism only to have their entire market jacked by people typing keywords into midjourney.

#like. yall know the exact kind of smooth shaded anime realism i mean right. #its SO prevelant in ai art to the point that i end up always end up assuming that style is ai more often than not

[r0semultiverse]

Hey! 1. you dont have to answer this if it is too laborious, i absolutely get it, but if you do feel like answering I would love your take.

This is a genuine question about ai and voice acting: so, I use a text to speech app to help get through my readings for college. I cant actually afford the AI voices, but from my brief trial period they sound so easy to understand, and I do sort of wish i could afford them over the more robotic voices for my study. Where do you stand on that?

I ask because i feel a little tangled up because 1. I hate AI, and i would rather listen to nails on a chalkboard than listen to an ai voice read an audiobook (also like, i am a writer and chatgpt breaks my heart) BUT 2. It's not like an academic article is going to be properly recorded for accessibility.

i genuinely dont know where I stand on this, and I suppose it starts getting a little murky when we talk about ai and accessibility. Is this one area where ai is ethical, because it is for accessibility? Or does that leave room for 'but i cant draw so midjourney is accessibility for me'? Or can we draw that line more firmly because there are neurological/psychological/developmental reasons someone might need to listen to their academic readings in order to learn rather than read them? Or do we need to push publishers to hire people to read their journals?

again, no pressure to respond. I feel like this is a murky, convoluted question, and ethics can be not super fun to dig into. BUT if it is cut-and-dry for you, i would love to hear your reasoning. I dont want to feel so murky about it.

To make a generalized statement before getting into some specifics; I think that personal private use of AI for stuff like that where you aren't going around sharing a voice actor's voice without their consent is fine. You need it to be able to better read things. You aren't sharing this with others or posting it up for views & clicks & YouTube clout only to (hopefully) later get sued or fined (or a YouTube strike) for the questionable legality of it. If we ever get laws protecting us voice actors (here's to hoping).

Let me clarify as well that consent should have to be given for peoples voices to be used however which ways they are currently. Yes, even for accessibility programs, the maker should be getting consent from and/or paying the voice actors for their voice. Ideally much like how big name companies get a share of movie ticket money & streaming revenue, that currently does not go to the actors/voice actors in a lot of instances. Voice actors & such should not just be getting that single payout for their work, but also payouts over time based on sales with products they helped make & streaming money too.

There's a very fine line between doing something privately & sharing it around publicly. I'm completely against stolen art, commission someone or keep those AI art pieces private to yourself.

I don't think it's on the publishers to have to have an audio version readily available. Book authors/writers & such are screwed over currently enough as is. Having said that, I think people online should be able to read any book out loud/create an audio book & publish it for accessibility & reading along purposes. I can't go reading certain books or literary works on stream due to fear of being copyright stricken. Book copyrights & things aren't my area of expertise though & I'm no professional writer trying to make a living off my work.

There's better educated people on the topics of books & accessibility out there. If you do make a book audio cover on YouTube, you shouldn't be able to monetize it without consent from the author(s). Authors & writers aren't treated great either. I think a lot more groups of people should be striking than are currently.

If it's a bougie publishing company (if those exist), then I think they should absolutely commission someone to have an audio book version of it. The voice actor should also get paid royalties or whatever you call that even after the initial payout though! Again, I don't know jack shit about how books & publishing work, this is just how I think at this current moment in time.

Also if people are going to post AI for clout anyway, they should legally have to disclose they're using AI in whatever they're publishing like how some countries have laws about disclosing when your content is sponsored or an advertisement.

Also as far as paying someone to voice act anything, no company or business gets to own our voices permanently. This is in addition to the things said above. Pay us to voice over a new book, pay us to say those lines, and every other possible instance this can apply to. Our voice isn’t anyone’s to permanently own and do what they want with regardless of context! Pay us for our voice over!

#I literally just woke up so I hope I worded this okay #this i how I feel about AI song covers & other such things #big differnce between private use & posting stolen voices for youtuber clout #im sure someone's going to completely misinterpret this somehow given my recent boom in followers but ah well #AI for clout is something that should be shamed & taken down for copyright violations #in the very least creators should legally have to disclose if they're using AI in whatever they put out onto the web #mine #op #asks #ask #anonymous #anon #ai in art #AI #ai song covers

[charlesoberonn]

#ai art #ai writing #tweet #other way around please #10k #20k #50k #100k #150k

[ex0skeletal-undead]

Begging people to stop reblogging this AI trash from “The Phantom Painter” on Instagram (instagram.com/phantom.painting). I’ve been seeing it on my dash more and more often from people who are otherwise anti-AI and either can’t tell it’s AI or don’t care because it looks cool.

This is the kind of shit that is VERY CLEARLY trained on the works of existing talented artists’ with distinct styles and this asshole is selling prints and making a profit off of stealing other people’s hard work.

Don’t give people like this money or attention and they will go away.

Please, if you’re going to buy art prints, buy them from an actual artist.

#anti AI art #anti AI

[rottenbrainstuff]

My god my girlies

MY GIRLIES. I am still crying, I am still crying about this. Every day I cry about this.

You bitched so hard about being forced to read 1984 in school when it’s so problematic (tm)

Maybe you should have actually paid attention when you read it

Because all these AI fics

You are LITERALLY MAKING THE GARBAGE NOVELS FROM 1984 that are written by machines

You have literally recreated the worthless soulless machine-made books

Literally,

Literally. Every once in a while it hits me in a fresh wave of disbelief and anger. You have literally created the dystopian book from the dystopian story about why dystopia is bad, and you are passing it around like it’s this amazing thing. I’m crying, I’m crying.

#ai art #anti ai