Tumgik
#did paul draw a vagina
chaotichedonist · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
The Beatles painting a collage 'Images of a Woman'
Tokyo Hilton Hotel in Japan, during the band's tour of Asia, 1966
By Robert (Bob) Whitaker
60 notes · View notes
nyarisu · 4 years
Text
Völkerball liveblogging
Dear lord this took me so long to edit you better appreciate it
Reise reise
Oooo~ but I still like the Hellfest version more :)) (Till’s face during the Hellfest chorus will always be my sexuality)
Schneider’s costume is fabulous but I’ll never trust those curls
Also vampire Reesh that’s a good look
Asdfghjklthe vagina entrance XDDD they really had to
Hello nice legs
I’ve watched this only once because i don’t like the sound. Someone said Till was sick and I don’t know what actually happened but his voice kinda sounds like it, especially more towards the middle of the live.
But the chorus is still so nice~
The tongue via Till’s fucked up slut face
Olli’s really serious
"Ist kein Licht am Horizont" REESH DO YOU WANNA KILL ME?? That was one sexy face
I really love Till’s expressions i want to kiss his face
The eyes! And then looking up to the sky<3 (was there even a sky or was inside I didn’t even notice XD)
I really don’t like Paul and Flake’s costumes
Fucking god that entrance is craking me up
Links 234
Hei hei hei!
I love how they all march on the stage
Bwhbwbwhwbhwbwhw XD
That’s a nice middle to wrap your hands around, mr Lindemann
I love when he’s hittig his chest on “links”
THE FANGS
Paul means business XD
You can’t not sing with them during links
Oh the solo<3 sounds so nice live
Thank god my favourite person from this stupid band is also the one most filmes otherwise I would’ve been in trouble
Dem boobs XD
Keine lust
I thought it was Sonne for one sec
He kicked the mic stand XD
Now you can hear he’s a little raspy
Yes Till we know the lyrics’ meaning and also that you’re horny
The chorus sounds nice again, it sounds better when he’s actually siniging vs talking
Who’s foamning at the mouth over that patch of skin under his pants, I’ve seen people talk about that (unfortunately it’s doing nothing for me)
"kaaaalt. Soo kaaaalt" I’ll keep you warm bby just don’t be sad T_T
Ok but Flake’s headpiece is actually hilariuous gotta admit
I really want to kiss Till *opening his mouth like a retarded owl* I don’t think I want anymore
Feuer frei
That was his I’m ready to slut pose XD
DONT HIT YOURSELF YOU DUMB BABY
Ooooooh Olli got shirtless (what were they calling this?)
I really like RZK’s top
Of course he’s gotta bully Flake
Chumby
I’m really trying to focus more on image but the voice is such a big thing for me and it’s clear he has something
The masks!! I love those so much
„Jaaaa”
Wow Schneider’s drumsticks went out with a literal bang
Asche zu Asche
4 lines later I finally realised what song is >.< and only because Till began to sing...
DID YOU SEE WHAT HE WAS DOING WITH THOSE DRUMSTICKS?!? I knew why I had a thing for hands/fingers
Asdfghjkl Richard strutting down the stage with his little red stripe<3
He’s a moody goth and I love his look did he just put his hands on his hips? XD
Till’s cheeks! I want to pinch his face
Everyone’s favourite part and THE NECK TILT ok wow now that was hot
Tho I usually preffer the “In zehn Tagen” to RZK’s “Ich komm wieder” now it was the opposite (probably because I couldn’t see Till that well) and Reesh acting all sexy was definitely improving it
Go Flake go XD he’s so serious and by the end he’s having the time of his life meanwhile Till is having an existential crisis (another)
Olli’s abs are heeeeella nice
Till with his hand over his heart didn’t help his case
Yeah Richard ok you’re sexy i get it holly fuck I’ve never been more attracted to him
And now i’ll never be able to unsee the neck tilt
That ich kom wieder just unmade me
Morgenstern
Bath time XD
I really like when Till slicks his hair back
Dear lord the chorus thank you for your voice sir and congrats on it
I really like the general image of a bassist playing their bass (other verb I could’ve used was fingering XD that’s literally what he’s doing!!)
Ooooh the keyboards sound so nice<3
DON’T pluck your eyes out!
The fire part is really impressive
I love then Richard is doign his gay boy pose XD and then the closeup on him while bobbing his head
I need to say once again the chorus sounds wundershon
Mein Teil
The first 2 seconds I thought it was MHB
Paul and Richard walking towards each other<3
Aaaand the epicness begins!
Schneider is fabulous behind his drums, can’t forget about him
YEET
The tongue’s is at it again
FLAKE POPING UP WITH THAT SMILE CRACKED ME UP you demented human
People are rocking the hell out this song
“durch Engelsscharen” Till’s expression<3
And the maddnes begins. Wow it was shorter than usual... obviously, it was at the beginning
Flake has such a special style of running I can’t XD
Stein um Stein
And everyone is gonna talk about him drawing a house xD it was cute (considering what the song is about)
You’re being a slut again
Aaaaah I want to complain about the playback but I really can’t I rather prefer him with vocal cords. At least the rest of the song sounded excelent!
The little sound at the end of „sein” and his face: childish enjoyment while talking about fucked up shit. If this doesn’t perfectly summarize Till then I don’t know what does
Schenider’s smile
No but really beside the screeching parts he sung it so well!
Were they trying to film Richards crotch? Whatever he’s sexy
Another reason why I watch this only once before was me being kind of meh regarding Till’s look he’s my favourite after all I gotta act the part
Los
My fucking god Scheider’s legs! I fucking love thighs. And he has a nice ass too
Richard’s smile!! Don’t kill me
Is it me or does Till start to stare into space and look generally Not Ok (tm)?
„fucking mickey mouse” XDDD
Los is among the last 10 songs on my list I usually just skip it
I died when I saw him with a harmonica the first time
Flake and Olli XD
Don’t manhandle poor Flake (I really want to say I wish that were me but knowing myself I would probably just deck Till in the face XD)
The sunglasses are sick
RZK and Till headbaning<3
Rip (rest in pieces) to keyboard
Du riechts so gut
THE BOW! The cute flamingo pose aside, that bow is one of my favourite pyro effects ever
And then the synchronised bodybanging<3
That „pang” never sounded so good?
WHY THE FUCK DID YOU EVEN MENTIONED THE NECK TILT REESH IS SO SEXY HERE I CAN’T EVEN
The deepest he sings the lees you hear the raspiness
Lord! The whole audience just fucking went for it
Schneider’s muscles, Richard’s little smirk and Till zombie 2.0
Even more bodybanging. Flake is enjoying himself
WHAT THE FUCK WHY ARE YOU SO PRETTY?!? (me to Richard)
Flake casually going back to his keyboards uthgjkhfzc that looked so cool and smooth
I promise I still drool over Till just... Richard is so prettily standing there! I cant ignore him!
The firesleeves are so cool and it looks so good, especially with them facing different ways
And freeze! Nice and dramatic
Till hammer time
That one guy really feeling the „DRSG” in the audience XD
Benzine
3 consecutive thought: it is Benzine fuck yeah, I can never tell if it’s Benzine or Keine Lust, Till’s terrified face
The most Rammstein song to ever Rammstein
Paul going wild XD but I still don’t like his hat
Flake is spazzing again
Du hast
Thank god I’m actually enjoying this song now, I skipped it for half a year
The drums and the beginning and the keyboards are <3
The tongue >w<
People are going wild
I like Richard’s dramatic gesturing. Pretty rockstar boy
The chorus sounds so good
Flake what is that on your head? XD is he a One Piece character?
Did he just casually shoved the mic into his pocket? XD
I much more preffer the newest effect from Paris onwards (which is also my top favourite)
Sehnsucht
This song has a very special and unique feel to it probably because it screams Live aus Berlin more than any other (and now I feel like watching LAB again)
It’s the chanting in the background probably
He’s sounding sick again :(
You have muscles in the arms (and probably legs too) and chumby in the belly it’s perfect
Lol @ Paul trying to look scary
„SEHNSUCHT!”
Ok Richard honey you can stop with the sexy neck tilt
He’s slapping the hell out of his guitar
Please stop pulling your hair out
Amerika
@Flake on that thing: wierd flex but ok
Sexy fishnet legs
Wow that’s a really soft and nice opening, pretty unexpected
LOL Flake taking off his hat like „sorry for your loss” but considering the song it’s expected from him XD
Beauatiful eyes<3
He’s just nyooming from one side of the stage to the other? XD
That eyeliner looks so fucking good on Till
Flake is suffering :)) (what the fuck was I talking about I can’t remember now that I’m editing)
Even Richard’s hair looks pretty! What the fuck??
The last scene with Schneider (and then his legs)
Rammstein
Those are some fucking guns he has right there
This is the most badass intrumental intro ever
“Scheeeeeein”
Oooooh so this is where that gif was coming from for some reason it thought it was Engel from MSG. Does this live even has Engel on it?
I love when drummers throw their sticks in the air and then catch them again
Ok the image of Till slowly backing off between Paul and Richard who were both vibing in their own way was really nice
Sonne
Schneider is enjoiying this isn’t he XD
For some reason this song doesn’t seem as energic as it usually is?
Was Till humping the mic stand? (more likely than you’d think)
Seing Flake and Till doing the hammer side by side is really funny, that’s some size difference
Ich will
Bye bye mic stand again
Till baby what did you do with your throat to make your voice sound like that?
Richard looking to the side during „ich will” hhhhhHhh
Let me slap that ass Till
I want to lick your face
Ohne dich
Ollie what are you doing
Asdfhjkl Flake comforting Till and the way he just rests his head on Flake’s shoulder is breaking my heart
Poor baby come here and let me love you
You can clearly see he’s trerrified
Lsnhxkvj his eyes<3
Nawwww they are kissing
I am silently thristing over Till don’t mind me
Please don’t cry T_T and then him looking over his bangs sfdghjkl
„is he... ya know” pose with a hand in the air Heirate mich style (aka Till Lehmann is a sub)
Look I know he’s suffering and all but I really can’t focus on that with all the water dripping off him
Stripped
No wonder I didn’t recognised the song it doensn’t even exist to me XD
Till pointing like „you. drop your panties. now” XD
I had half a mind to skip it but then I would have missed Till’s wonderful tongue performance
Was he flicking it to the rythm??
Hearing him sing in english is always so weird (I only recently rediscovered the gem the Children of the Sun is)
Richard what was that sexy face?
Ollie is braving the human seas, telepathy at its finest XD
Hmm that is a really nice lower back
Gangsta XD „how do you do fellow kids”
Paul is enjoying the show
Schneider has killer looks. Literally XD
YEET
Conclusions:
Half of it went really slow and then the other half went really fast? I don’t understand what happened
So this is the setting for Mit Dir Bin Ich Auch Allein... ok, good to know ;)
You sure this was a good idea 4 songs in and I already wrote 2 pages, now the total is at 6.
I’m not particulary fond of the looks and Till sounds sick so I usually avoid this live. Also some songs are weird with the energy so yeah
Richard is so pretty I can’t (and fucking hot how come I don’t remeber this??)
25 notes · View notes
tonysttank · 6 years
Text
safety | s.p. | part 2
a/n: hi everyone! Part 2 finally done. I do plan on updating this story at least once a week, possibly more if I am able to, so if you would like to be put on a taglist for this fic like and reblog this so I can add you and you wont miss a part J also this is currently set pre season 2, so keep that in mind.
Words: 1.7k
Warnings: brief mention of underage drinking, cussing
Read part 1 here: Part 1
Your name: submit What is this?
***
“love made the danger in you look like safety” –rupi kaur, milk and honey
  ***
Fangs, Sweet Pea, and Y/N went back into Fangs room to wait until the party started. Y/N carried in her overnight bag and set it next to the door. Sweet Pea eyed it suspiciously, wondering if Y/N and Fangs were more than just best friends, as they claimed to be. He definitely hoped not.
“So,” Y/N began, standing next to the door with her arms crossed as she looked at the two boys. “Tell me everything I need to know about the cliché town of Riverdale.” She said dramatically.
“Well, obviously you’re gonna be sticking with us and the rest of the Serpents.” Fangs told her, glancing at Sweet Pea. “We’ll take care of you and that way you won’t have anything to worry about, really.”
Sweet Pea nodded in agreeance with his friend. “The Southside stays pretty chill, unless there’s some shit going on between us and the Ghoulies.”
“The Ghoulies?” Y/N asked, a playful smile on her face.
“Yeah, that’s the rival gang here. They’re pretty nasty, and are deep into drug dealing so don’t get involved.” Fangs said, a look of distaste on his face.
“And what about school?” Y/N asked again, sitting on the bed with the two boys.
“Its trash,” Sweet Pea replied, rolling his eyes. “Don’t expect anything. The teachers don’t give a shit and neither do most of the students.” Y/N nodded in response, turning to look at him. She gave him a small smile, which he returned, and a blush crept onto her cheeks.
The three of them sat in Fangs’ bed talking, laughing, and telling stories. As they sat there happily Sweet Pea couldn’t help but steal a great number of glances at Y/N, her smile made him smile and feel warm inside. The way that this girl was making him feel after such an insanely short amount of time scared him, especially because he had no idea what she was thinking about him. He desperately hoped it was something good. Sweet Pea wasn’t the best with girls, despite what people may think. Sure, he flirted occasionally with girls at the Wyrm, and he definitely wasn’t a virgin, but he wasn’t the player everyone thought he was. Maybe it was because he was afraid of change and not the best when meeting new people, but he had definitely never had a girlfriend. As Sweet Pea looked at the gorgeous girl sitting in front of him with her legs crossed and her hand on Fangs’ shoulder as she laughed at something stupid he had just said, he felt a little hopeless. Y/N seemed perfect, and Sweet Pea definitely wasn’t. Not that it even mattered, they had only just met an hour ago, and for all he knew she could have a boyfriend back in Greendale.
Sweet Pea sighed, getting off the bed. “I’m gonna go to the bathroom.” He told Y/N and Fangs as he walked out of the room.
Fangs looked at Y/N with a knowing smile.
“What?” She asked, moving her head back because of the sly smile on his face.
“He likes you.” Fangs said simply and with a smirk.
“What do you mean?” Y/N asked, scrunching her eyebrows together, not understanding what he was implying.
“You didn’t see the way he looked at you in the living room when I introduced you guys?”
“Um, no?” Y/N laughed, her tone unsure.
“He fell in love with you right out there.”
“Fangs, what the fuck are you talking about? No, he didn’t. You’re just messing with me because you know I think he’s sexy as hell.” Y/N laughed.
“Okay, first of all, ew. Second of all, yes. I know SP better than anyone else.”
Y/N rolled her eyes. “Whatever, Fangs. I don’t believe you.”
“You’ll seeeeeeeee” Fangs said, poking her arm.
***
It was a few hours later and the annual Fogarty Christmas party was in full swing. Toni had arrived, and she and Y/N clicked immediately. Fangs had spent the majority of the party taking his friend around and introducing her to his friends and family that she hadn’t met yet. Eventually, though, he left her with his Dad, and Y/N and Paul caught up, talking mainly about her family’s upcoming move to the Southside.
On the other side of the room, Fangs, Sweet Pea, and Toni stood in a corner with Red Solo cups in their hand.
“So, you guys love her, right?” Fangs anxiously asked his friends what they thought about Y/N. He had been dying to know what they thought of her since she arrived, and now that the three of them were alone it was the perfect opportunity.
“Duh, Fangs. She’s like you, but just with a vagina.” Toni laughed, glancing over at her new friend across the room. “She’s gonna fit in just fine around here, I think.”
“Thank God,” Fangs began, a sigh of relief falling from his mouth. “I was so worried you guys wouldn’t like her, and if that happened I don’t know what I would do.”
“What do you think of her, Sweets?” Toni asked, craning her neck to look up at the tall, dark haired Serpent with her eyebrow raised.
He hesitated for a minute, not knowing if he should tell his best friends that he was already majorly crushing on Y/N or if he should keep it to himself. His hesitation brought forth a series of snickers from his two friends, who both failed in trying to mask them by taking a sip of the alcoholic drinks they harbored in their cups. Sweet Pea rolled his eyes, getting somewhat defensive at their teasing nature.
“It’s okay if you like her.” Toni said, a small smile on her lips as she reached out and touched Sweet Pea’s leather clad arm.
“Who ever said anything about liking her?” Sweet Pea snapped back at her, a look of annoyance gracing his face. “I just met her like a few hours ago, so I don’t know why the fuck you guys are coming at me like I’m about to drop on one knee and marry the girl.”
“Okay, dude,” Fangs said, holding his hands up in surrender. “We were just messing with you. No need to get all hostile.”
Sweet Pea rolled his eyes, obviously he would not be telling anyone about his building feelings for Y/N, as his friends were too immature to take him seriously and not embarrass him. “Whatever, I’m going outside for a smoke.” He said, and stomped away.
“Yikes,” Toni said to Fangs.
“I mean,” Fangs began in response, “Obviously he likes her, or he wouldn’t have just acted like that.”
“I know, but you know how he is, especially with girls and shit.” The pink haired girl replied with a shrug. Fangs was quiet, sipping on his drink thoughtfully. “You think they’d be good together?” Toni asked again after a moment of silence.
Fangs looked at her. “Honestly, I’m not sure. They could either be really bad for each other or really good.”
“I suppose only time will tell.” Toni said before downing the rest of her drink. “Wanna go chill in your room?” She asked him as she tossed her cup into the trash can nearby.
Fangs nodded and the two of them weaved through the crowd of people until they finally made it into Fangs’ room.
***
Y/N had been talking to Fangs’ dad for quite some time now, and even though she loved Paul, she desperately wanted to go hang out with her new friends. She had noticed Sweet Pea walk out the front door a little while ago and just assumed that Toni and Fangs would be with him, so after excusing herself from Paul, she went in search of the trio. As she stepped outside, she took a deep breath, her lungs thanking her for the fresh air. She turned and looked to her left, only to be met with a sulky looking Sweet Pea with a cigarette hanging from his lips. She approached him slowly, shoving her hands in her pockets.
“Hey, I was wondering where you guys all went.” She said, a happy tone in her voice.
He looked over at her, taking a long drag from the cigarette in his mouth. “What are you talking about?” He said gruffly.
Y/N was taken aback slightly at his tone, since he had been so sweet to her up until this point. “Oh,” She started sheepishly. “I just thought Fangs and Toni were with you.”
He shook his head, “Don’t know where they are.”
Y/N looked at him for a minute before responding, “Are you okay?”
He immediately looked up at her with narrowed eyes, surprised at her question. Based on the way he was looking at her, Y/N immediately regretted prying.
“Sorry, I-I didn’t mean to pry.” She said nervously, taking a step back. “I’ll leave you alone now.”
Before she could turn around to leave, Sweet Pea grabbed her hand. Y/N looked up at his dark brown eyes, waiting for him to say something.
“I’m not okay.” He said lowly, dropping his cigarette and squishing it with his boot.
“Why?” Y/N replied breathlessly, the intense and unreadable look he was giving her making her palms sweat.
Sweet Pea didn’t respond instantly, instead he stared at this gorgeous girl in front of him, completely mesmerized by her.
“Sweet Pea?” Y/N asked again, drawing him out of his daze.
“I’m not okay because I just met you, but you’re making me feel a type of way I’ve never felt before. It’s fucking terrifying, but I don’t want the feeling to go away.” He said barely above a whisper, his eyes not meeting hers.
Y/N was surprised, thinking back to what Fangs had told her earlier. She didn’t know what to say, so she just blurted out the first thing that came to her mind. “Why does the way I make you feel scare you?” She asked, taking a step closer to the tall boy, their bodies touching now.
“Because I’ve known you for less than 12 hours, and I already know that I would fucking die for you, Y/N.”
His words made her suck in a breath, and she stared deeply into his eyes, relishing in the intimate moment they were sharing. She didn’t know how to express the feelings she was now drowning in, so she did the only thing she felt was right in the moment.
She kissed him.
96 notes · View notes
improbable-warden · 4 years
Note
What do you think about the Christian Bible and verses like Romans 1:26-27? “That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other. And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved.”
Well I have a particularly... strained relationship with all of the Epistles because they were written by Paul who I think might be the historical person for which I personally hold the most disdain and animosity. See, I consider that he alone is responsible for the better part of misogyny and homophobia that gets propagated by the Church because it’s his writing in Timothy 2: 10-1 (”I suffer not a woman to speak but to be in silence, etc...”) and his writing in Romans (reference to the verse you pointed out) that get quoted almost constantly by misogynists and homophobes. But my personal vendetta with Paul’s wrong opinion (and also the inconsistencies between the New Testament and Old Testament with regards to sexuality) aside, let’s deconstruct the actual verses that you’ve pointed out, because while they’re a brazenly homophobic they also include an ambiguity which a medieval understanding of sex (which stems from a late antique understanding of sex and is derived from readings of scripture, namely, Paul) will help make sense of--and yes, it must be a medieval understanding because that is much closer to an accurate representation of what was going on in late antiquity than our modern ideas of sex, which, it needs to be pointed out, derive from a severely demented form of a medieval Catholic understanding of sex, by which I mean, of course, a Victorian/protestant understanding of sex which is actually much less forgiving, much more harmful, and significantly more homophobic. 
So let’s consider the phrase “the natural way to have sex”, or “ contra naturam” in the Latin. We must understand the complex implications of this phrase because actually the “natural way to have sex” was extremely specific in Christian theology and also applies restrictions to straight copulation as well. And of course, the “natural way to have sex” is penis and vagina (so, absolutely no oral, even for straight people, because that’s sodomy), AND it’s also strictly missionary position (so if the lady gets on top, hey, that’s also ‘unnatural’ and sodomitic)--why? because this is the only way to get a lady pregnant which, according to Augustine, drawn from scriptural readings, is the only appropriate reason to be having sex at all. Now I’m not an antique scholar so I don’t know an excessive amount about sexual culture in late antiquity, but the primary and secondary sources I draw from include and study the works of St Augustine, St Jerome, Origen, etc. as pertains to this matter specifically (ie: sexuality). So, solidly late antiquity. But also as far as I understand, the Greeks (antiquity) and probably also the Romans (antiquity-late antiquity) (also, pagans, and yes this is important) engaged in homosexual activity. So we really, really need to understand that “the natural sex act” being penis-in-vagina-missionary-style is a specifically Christian phenomenon (which, like, congratulations, the most brutally vain of all the gods has decided there is literally one way to have sex and everything else is a sin? who is going to obey that? oh, right, no one--and yes there’s proof of this). Essentially, from this study of the wording, we can understand that Paul took the broad concept of “natural sex” and then described only some of the many “unnatrual sex acts” in order to to wield the concept for a homophobic purpose, which actually just makes him a bigoted man who used the strength of auctoritas and a powerful institution to propagate his wrong ass opinion. 
Side note: I think it’s wildly hilarious that the English translation says “even women”, as though it’s a shock that a woman wouldn’t rather have sex with a woman than a man. The Latin doesn’t actually do this (”nam feminae”, and nam actually means “for”), and so this obscenely hilarious (because its disgustingly obvious to anyone who doesn’t take the Bible at face value) and subtle denial of lesbian attraction is purely an invention on the part of the translator, which actually tells us more about what the translator’s ethos is on the subject than God’s. 
So to sum up, what I think of Romans 1:26-27 is that it was both written and translated by men (most probably; I don’t know what translation you’re using, but assuming it’s done by a man is probably a safe bet) with absolutely homophobic intentions who twist the Word of God (such as it is...) in order to foster an institution of oppression.
Edit: I realised that I didn’t answer my opinion on the Bible in general because I was so busy deconstructing Paul. I enjoy reading the bible as an anthology of fictional stories. It’s extremely entertaining. But as a cohesive work... well, it’s not a cohesive work. It’s paradoxes within paradoxes. The Old and the New Testament contradict each other completely. Not only that but later sections of the New Testament contradict earlier sections of the New Testament. I think that as a moral guide it’s extremely problematic, not only because it’s very metaphorical and people really shouldn’t be left to interpret it on their own, but also because its morals are literally 2020 years outdated at least and that’s... unacceptable. So yea, I get really frustrated with the Bible. It’s not a good moral compass for the average citizen. It’s a fascinating literary study. 
0 notes
Text
Actress Files Sexual Battery Suit Against Harvey Weinstein
New Post has been published on http://usnewsaggregator.com/actress-files-sexual-battery-suit-against-harvey-weinstein/
Actress Files Sexual Battery Suit Against Harvey Weinstein
Tumblr media
LOS ANGELES — An unnamed actress has sued Harvey Weinstein alleging he committed sexual battery against her in Beverly Hills hotel rooms in 2015 and 2016 after she agreed to meet the producer to discuss a television role.
The actress is identified only as Jane Doe in the sexual battery lawsuit filed Tuesday in Los Angeles Superior Court. It alleges that Weinstein held the woman against her will while Weinstein engaged in sexual situations.
The suit says the woman first met Weinstein in 2011 at a party and he offered to assist her with her acting career. For several years, Weinstein invited the woman to awards show parties.
Weinstein allegedly met her at the Montage Hotel in Beverly Hills in late 2015 to discuss a part in the television series “Marco Polo,” which Weinstein and his company were producing. The producer asked her if he could masturbate in front of her, and when she refused, he held her by the wrist and forced her to watch him, the lawsuit said.
Related: Hollywood Mogul Harvey Weinstein Fired Amid Sexual Harassment Allegations
The next incident happened several months later at the same hotel, according to the lawsuit. The woman agreed to meet Weinstein to discuss the “Marco Polo” role again, and this time alleges Weinstein threw her on a bed, started performing oral sex on her and put his penis inside her vagina before starting to start masturbate on her, the lawsuit states.
The woman was able to break free and flee the room, the suit said.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Harvey Weinstein arrives for the 73rd Annual Golden Globe Awards at the Beverly Hilton Hotel on January 10, 2016 in Beverly Hills. Paul Buck / EPA file
“Any allegations of non-consensual sex are unequivocally denied by Mr. Weinstein,” the producer’s representative Holly Baird wrote in a statement. “Mr. Weinstein obviously can’t speak to anonymous allegations, but with respect to any women who have made allegations on the record, Mr. Weinstein believes that all of these relationships were consensual.”
The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages. It also names The Weinstein Co., which fired its co-founder after decades of allegations of sexual harassment were detailed in an expose by The New York Times last month.
The Weinstein Co. did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.
Related: #MeToo March Draws Hundreds of Supporters in California
The lawsuit alleges the company knew of Weinstein’s sexual harassment and abuse behavior, and showed “deliberate indifference” to prevent his actions.
The lawsuit was filed by Gloria Allred, who did not immediately return a message seeking additional details about the case.
Beverly Hills police have said they are investigating allegations against Weinstein, but have released few details. Authorities in Los Angeles, New York and London are also investigating Weinstein for possible criminal prosecution.
The harassment and abuse allegations against Weinstein have created led to numerous women coming forward with allegations of harassment and abuse against powerful men, including actor Kevin Spacey, numerous entertainment industry executives and politicians in the United States and abroad.
The scandal in Hollywood has prompted Los Angeles County District Attorney Jackie Lacey to establish a task force to handle any forthcoming criminal complaints. The advocacy group Women in Film also plans to make a help line and panel of pro-bono legal experts available beginning next month to provide counseling, referrals and legal advice to harassment victims
Related: Here’s a Growing List of Men Accused of Sexual Misconduct
Also on Tuesday, the independent theater Cinefamily in Los Angeles announced it was shutting down due to crippling debt after conducting a review of sexual harassment allegations against two of its leaders. The theater had numerous celebrity fans and supporters, was rocked by sexual harassment allegations against its executive director and a board member in August.
The board suspended the theater’s activities and hired an independent firm to investigate the allegations.
The board says that no victims corroborated rape claims, but the investigation did uncover serious concerns and breaches of acceptable behavior.
Cinefamily had many celebrity supporters and fans including Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, David Geffen, Brie Larson, Jon Favreau, Sting and James L. Brooks.
NBC News announced Tuesday it fired Matt Zimmerman, its top talent booker, for “inappropriate conduct” with more than one woman at the network.
Zimmerman used to be in charge of arranging guests for the “Today” show but in 2014 was promoted to vice president and led the behind-the-scenes unit responsible for such bookings at all NBC News programs.
The network didn’t give any details Tuesday about Zimmerman’s behavior, only that he violated company policy. The network acted in response to internal complaints.
Messages sent to Zimmerman were not returned Tuesday.
NBC recently fired political contributor Mark Halperin, who had been accused of sexual harassment by several women dating to when he worked at ABC News more than a decade ago.
Associated Press Writers David Bauder in New York and Sandy Cohen and Lindsey Bahr in Los Angeles contributed to this report.
Original Article:
Click here
0 notes
cover2covermom · 5 years
Text
Happy Sunday bookworms!
Did everyone have a good weekend?  I had a lovely weekend full of watching the U.S. Open & football, my kids’ sporting events, bonfires, charity dance events, and pickle ball.  The weather cooled off this week, and things were finally starting to feel like Fall.  Unfortunately summer is going to come back with a vengeance this week with temperatures returning to 90°F.
*Bookish Weekly Wrap-Up is a weekly post where I feature what posts were published on the blog for the past week, any bookish/blog happenings, what I recently finished reading, what I am currently reading, what I will be reading next, noteworthy posts around the bookish blogisphere, and any interesting bookish articles I came across.
Monday 8/26
Mini Book Reviews: August 2019 – Part 2
Sunday 9/1
August 2019 Reading & Blogging Wrap-Up + Book Haul
Monday 9/2
September 2019 TBR: “Series September”
Most anticipated books published this past week:
» Butterfly Yellow by Thanhha Lai
Genre: Historical Fiction
Release Date: September 3, 2019
In the final days of the Việt Nam War, Hằng takes her little brother, Linh, to the airport, determined to find a way to safety in America. In a split second, Linh is ripped from her arms—and Hằng is left behind in the war-torn country.
Six years later, Hằng has made the brutal journey from Việt Nam and is now in Texas as a refugee. She doesn’t know how she will find the little brother who was taken from her until she meets LeeRoy, a city boy with big rodeo dreams, who decides to help her.
Hằng is overjoyed when she reunites with Linh. But when she realizes he doesn’t remember her, their family, or Việt Nam, her heart is crushed. Though the distance between them feels greater than ever, Hằng has come so far that she will do anything to bridge the gap.
» Tunnel of Bones (Cassidy Blake #2) by Victoria Schwab
Genre: Middle Grade Fantasy > Paranormal
Release date:  September 3, 2019
Trouble is haunting Cassidy Blake . . . even more than usual.
She (plus her ghost best friend, Jacob, of course) are in Paris, where Cass’s parents are filming their TV show about the world’s most haunted cities. Sure, it’s fun eating croissants and seeing the Eiffel Tower, but there’s true ghostly danger lurking beneath Paris, in the creepy underground Catacombs.
When Cass accidentally awakens a frighteningly strong spirit, she must rely on her still-growing skills as a ghosthunter — and turn to friends both old and new to help her unravel a mystery. But time is running out, and the spirit is only growing stronger.
And if Cass fails, the force she’s unleashed could haunt the city forever.
» How to Raise a Reader by Pamela Paul & Maria Russo
Genre: Nonfiction
Release date:  September 3, 2019
An indispensable guide to welcoming children—from babies to teens—to a lifelong love of reading, written by Pamela Paul and Maria Russo, editors of The New York Times Book Review.
Do you remember your first visit to where the wild things are? How about curling up for hours on end to discover the secret of the Sorcerer’s Stone? Combining clear, practical advice with inspiration, wisdom, tips, and curated reading lists, How to Raise a Reader shows you how to instill the joy and time-stopping pleasure of reading.
Divided into four sections, from baby through teen, and each illustrated by a different artist, this book offers something useful on every page, whether it’s how to develop rituals around reading or build a family library, or ways to engage a reluctant reader. A fifth section, “More Books to Love: By Theme and Reading Level,” is chockful of expert recommendations. Throughout, the authors debunk common myths, assuage parental fears, and deliver invaluable lessons in a positive and easy-to-act-on way
Interesting bookish articles:
» How to Start a Book Club
» 6 Modern Books to Help Parents Raising Teen Girls
» 15 best debut novels so far in 2019
» Listen Up! Podcasts for the Whole Family
» Five Ways to Structure Your Book Club Discussion
» Diverse Tween Reads for Your School Library
» The Best Children’s and YA Books of August 2019
» Quiz: What Type of Book Club is Right for You?
» Books Recs Based on Your Favorite Teen TV Shows
» Audiobooks 101: A Beginner’s Guide to Audiobooks
» Diverse Books for Tweens and Teens Written by Own Voices Authors
» 15 Fantastic Middle Grade Books Hitting Shelves in Fall 2019
Recently Finished Reading:
#gallery-0-10 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-10 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 20%; } #gallery-0-10 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-10 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
» Book Girl: A Journey Through the Treasures and Transforming Power of a Reading Life by Sarah Clarkson
*3.5 Stars*
I loved learning about Sarah’s journey & her connection to books.  I think Sarah has excellent reading tastes, and will probably borrow the physical copy from the library to copy down all the reading recommendation lists.  I gave it 3.5 stars because it was too heavily focused on religion & faith for my tastes.
» Gods of Jade and Shadow by Silvia Moreno-Garcia
Gods of Jade and Shadow was one of my most anticipated books of 2019, but it came up a bit short for me.  The story felt like a fairy tale filled with Mexican folklore, which I loved, but the book felt very surface level.
» The Great Alone by Kristin Hannah
*4.5 Stars*
Set in the harsh wild of Alaska in the 70s, The Great Alone was an excellent survival type of story – in more ways than one.  While reading I thought Hannah was going to go the cliche route a few times, but she kept on surprising me.
» The Dragon Republic (The Poppy War #2) by R.F. Kuang
The Dragon Republic was an excellent follow up to The Poppy War.   The political intrigue in this book is engrossing.
» The Horse and His Boy (Chronicles of Narnia #5) by C.S. Lewis
This has been my least favorite book in the series thus far, but still a very enjoyable read.  There is something so nostalgic about this series, which doesn’t exactly make sense since it is my first time reading these books…  If I had to rank the series thus far, it would be 1) Chronicles of Narnia, 2) The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, 3) The Silver Chair, 4) Prince Caspian, and 5) The Horse and His Boy.
Currently Reading:
» Nobody Said Not to Go: The Life, Loves, and Adventures of Emily Hahn by Ken Cuthbertson
Status: 25%
I had to put this one on hold while I knock some of my library books out.
» The Queen of Attolia (The Queen’s Thief #2) by Megan Whalen Turner
Status: 58%
» The Smartest Kids in the World: And How They Got That Way by Amanda Ripley
Status: 20%
What Am I Reading Next?:
» Wintersmith (Tiffany Aching #3) by Terry Pratchett
Tiffany Aching is a trainee witch — now working for the seriously scary Miss Treason. But when Tiffany witnesses the Dark Dance — the crossover from summer to winter — she does what no one has ever done before and leaps into the dance. Into the oldest story there ever is. And draws the attention of the Wintersmith himself.
As Tiffany-shaped snowflakes hammer down on the land, can Tiffany deal with the consequences of her actions? Even with the help of Granny Weatherwax and the Nac Mac Feegle — the fightin’, thievin’ pictsies who are prepared to lay down their lives for their “big wee hag.”
Wintersmith is the third title in an exuberant series crackling with energy and humour. It follows The Wee Free Men and Hat Full of Sky.
» Let’s Pretend This Never Happened by Jenny Lawson
For fans of Tina Fey and David Sedaris—Internet star Jenny Lawson, aka The Bloggess, makes her literary debut.
Jenny Lawson realized that the most mortifying moments of our lives—the ones we’d like to pretend never happened—are in fact the ones that define us. In the #1 New York Times bestseller, Let’s Pretend This Never Happened, Lawson takes readers on a hilarious journey recalling her bizarre upbringing in rural Texas, her devastatingly awkward high school years, and her relationship with her long-suffering husband, Victor. Chapters include: “Stanley the Magical, Talking Squirrel”; “A Series of Angry Post-It Notes to My Husband”; “My Vagina Is Fine. Thanks for Asking”; “And Then I Snuck a Dead Cuban Alligator on an Airplane.” Pictures with captions (no one would believe these things without proof) accompany the text.
» @The Orangutan Librarian shares a recommendation list ⇒ GATEWAY SCI FI BOOKS
» Marie @Drizzle and Huricane Books talks about adding a little spark to book blog posts ⇒ HOW TO GIVE YOUR BOOK BLOG POSTS THAT EXTRA SPARK
» CW shares recs for books by Asian authors with mental illness rep ⇒ Year of the Asian Reading Challenge – Book Recommendations for September’s Prompt: Mental Illness Awareness!
Have you read any of the books included in this post?  If so, what did you think?
What are you currently reading?
What will you read next?
Have a wonderful week & happy reading
Bookish Weekly Wrap-Up: 8/26 - 9/8/19 #BookBlog #BookBlogger #Bookworm #AmReading #Books #WrapUp Happy Sunday bookworms! Did everyone have a good weekend?  I had a lovely weekend full of watching the U.S.
0 notes
musiccosmosru · 6 years
Link
1
Amanda Seyfried
During an appearance on Late Night With Seth Meyers, Seyfried explained the meaning behind her foot tattoo, which says “minge.”
“It’s a term of endearment and in England it means vagina but in the U.S., where I spend most of my time, it doesn’t mean anything,” she said. “We commemorated our friendship with ‘minge’ tattoos.”
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
2
Brooklyn Beckham
Brooklyn Beckham revealed this heartwarming tribute on Instagram, featuring the numbers “0 2 0 5 1 1.” The design is by tattoo artist Mr. K., who also posted the photo and revealed that the numbers represent the birth dates of each of Beckham’s three siblings (Romeo, September 1, 2002; Cruz, February 20, 2005; Harper, July 10, 2011).
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
3
Miley Cyrus
Miley Cyrus posted an Instagram of her new tattoo and explained its meaning in the caption: “Vegan for life!
Tumblr media
.”
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
4
Justin Bieber
Justin Bieber got a new tattoo on his leg that says “Better At 70.” He explained the ink’s meaning in an Instagram caption. “I look back at a lot of things in my life, mistakes, insecurities, and although I have felt I’ve wasted a lot of time it also makes me want to be better faster! For me personally I want to work everyday to be BETTER AT 70,” he wrote.
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
5
Miley Cyrus
The meaning behind Miley’s latest piece of ink isn’t hard to decipher. The 24-year-old got a new tattoo on her foot as a tribute to one of the most important men in her life—her dad, Billy Ray Cyrus. Billy Ray showed the tattoo off with pride on Twitter.
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
6
Kylie Jenner
The super famous 18-year-old showed off her newest ink from celebrity artist Bang Bang on Instagram: the phonetic spelling of “sanity” in red ink on her right hip. The tattoo matches her other red ink—a heart above her elbow, also by Bang Bang. She also has an unidentified tat on her left hip…perhaps, “insanity?” The jury is out.
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
7
Sam Smith
Sam Smith recently got not one, not two, but FOUR new tattoos—all with significant meaning. The first, an equality sign inked on his wedding ring finger (shown) is “pretty self explanatory. It shows my views on gay marriage and equality for all.” The second, a symbol on the inside of his finger, shows one of the first tattoos documented—found on a mummy “found buried alone in the ice.” The third, script on his arm that says “honesty” is what Smith promises to be in his music. And the fourth? “Alone” on his other arm. “This is just me being a melancholy twat haha. I do see it as a small positive thou… No longer lonely… Just alone…”
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
8
Kendall Jenner
The model received possibly the smallest tattoo known to man on her hand—a tiny white dot. The meaning? As tattoo artist JonBoy (who did the ink) told Refinery29, “To her, it’s the little things that matter. And the white color was because she didn’t want it to show with modeling and all that.”
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
9
Selena Gomez
The songstress got one of her newest tattoos in Arabic, which roughly translates to “love yourself first.”
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
10
Miley Cyrus
Miley Cyrus got her first tattoo at 17—script of “Just Breathe” below her breast—as a tribute to her friend Vanessa who had died of lung disease and both of her grandfathers, who had died of lung cancer.”It reminds me not to take things for granted. I mean breathing—that was something none of them could do, the most basic thing. And I put it near my heart, because that is where they will always be,” she told Harper’s Bazaar.
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
11
Emma Stone
Emma Stone shares a special bond with her mom–and Paul McCartney. To celebrate her mother being cancer-free, Emma and her mother marked the occasion with tattoos that pay tribute to their favorite song, Beatles’ “Blackbird”…which were designed by Paul McCartney himself. Yes, really. The actress wrote a letter to the singer and “Blackbird” lyricist asking for a drawing of birds’ feet to tattoo, and he responded by sending over the drawings. “Custom tattoos by Paul McCartney. Isn’t that wild?” she told Us Weekly. “He’s a good guy.”
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
12
Vanessa Hudgens
The actress got her first tattoo when she was 22—a butterfly on the back of her neck. “It was very last minute, but I’ve actually wanted it for years,” she told Letterman. “A butterfly landed on my mum’s stomach a week before I was born and that’s how I got my name, because Vanessa means butterfly—it’s a Latin derivative.”
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
13
Lady Gaga
One of the singer’s most striking pieces is this arm tattoo, which features a German quote from Letters to a Young Poet written by Rainer Maria Rilke, along with the date 12/18/1974, which commemorates her aunt who died before she was born, but who she feels a deep connection to.
The tattoo speaks to solitude, which Gaga says as an artist you have to embrace. Translated, it reads: “In the deepest hour of the night; Confess to yourself that you would die if you were forbidden to write; And look deep into your heart where it spreads its roots, the answer; and ask yourself, must I write?”
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
14
Cara Delevingne
The model/actress/can-doer loves tattoos—including this one, script of her initials (Cara Jocelyn Delevingne) inked by Bang Bang NYC.
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
15
Angelina Jolie
Angelina is, famously, no stranger to tattoos, but her arm tattoo is possibly the cutest. It has all the coordinates of her children’s birth places, along with Brad Pitt’s. Awww.
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
16
Rihanna
RiRi had 1988, the year she was born, inked on her right ankle by Bang Bang, because of course.
Advertisement – Continue Reading Below
<a style="display:none" rel="follow" href="http://megatheme.ir/" title="قالب وردپرس">قالب وردپرس</a>
The post Celebrity Tattoo Meanings – Celebrity Tats appeared first on MusicCosmoS.
0 notes
djgblogger-blog · 6 years
Text
What Doug Jones's win means for Mitch McConnell, Steve Bannon and the Democrats
http://bit.ly/2yAjvVh
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell calls for Roy Moore to step aside. He later said "let the voters decide." AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
Here’s the thing about selling your soul: The devil had better deliver. It’s one thing to be damned; it’s another to be a damned loser.
This is the difficult lesson that the Republican National Committee and much of the GOP are learning right now, in the wake of Roy Moore’s loss on Tuesday. While there were plenty of Republicans who refused to back Moore, there were also plenty who did, or chose to “let the voters decide.”
As someone who has studied politics as long as I have knows, the GOP holds no monopoly on betraying principles. But this was a pretty high profile investment in it. They did so presumably not because they are down with pedophilia, but because their discomfort with Moore – or for that matter, with Trump – did not outweigh their discomfort with losing power. For the past 18 months or so, and perhaps most conspicuously in the past couple of weeks, most Republicans seem to have calculated that their best path to maintaining power was to jump in bed with Steve Bannon and the so-called Trump base (maybe with the lights off, but still). And now here they are.
Sure, only one seat changed hands. But that one seat makes a big difference when you are clinging to such a precarious Senate majority. One place where that difference is being felt immediately is on the tax bill. Any hope that the GOP would carefully work out the bill’s considerable kinks in a conference committee is now lost. Republicans know they have to get this thing done now, before Jones is seated in January. The Senate bill only passed with 51 votes. Come 2018, all it would take is for John McCain to rediscover his thumb or for Rand Paul to get beaten up again (which is never out of the question), and the signature achievement of this GOP team would wind up falling short of final passage. And as I wrote a couple of weeks ago, if Republicans can’t cut taxes when they enjoy unified power, why do they get up in the morning?
Conservatives should finish their business on the tax bill now – because getting anything else on their wish list just became considerably more daunting. Entitlement reform? Please. Swing vote Republican lawmakers like Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski just became more powerful, and they aren’t going to put up with significant cuts to Medicare, Medicaid or SNAP.
Just as the moderates in the party are seeing their stock rise, the insurgents are surely seeing theirs fall. In case there was any doubt following the special elections in Virginia and New Jersey last month, this Alabama outcome pretty well explodes the myth that candidates should cultivate Steve Bannon’s blessing. Meghan McCain, John McCain’s daughter and a Republican, pithily summed up the new conventional wisdom.
As for 2018, the Democrats still have to draw an inside straight to gain control of the Senate. They are defending 26 seats, 11 of which are in states that Trump either won or lost narrowly. By comparison, the Republicans are only defending eight seats, mostly in deep red states. The Democrats only have two, or perhaps three, realistic pickup opportunities. But they only need two, and Tuesday’s result means they now have a plausible chance at getting them. The party that is out of power typically gains seats in midterm elections anyway, even when the president is not historically unpopular. And recent polling shows that Democrats enjoy a double-digit lead when voters are asked which party they would prefer to control the Senate. If such sentiment holds for another 11 months, it may be enough to counterbalance a map that, in any other year, might be prohibitive.
And the sledding might grow even tougher for Republicans. Something has clearly changed since Trump was elected. The Resistance is gaining strength, as we could see even before Tuesday in the historic numbers of women who are running for office, and in the #MeToo locomotive. Alabama just gave the movement that much more momentum.
This is not just feminist protesters in coastal cities wearing vaginas on their heads. It isn’t just self-righteous entertainers making windy acceptance speeches. And it isn’t just college students asking for trigger warnings and safe spaces. It’s also devout mothers –- in red states, no less –- saying enough is enough.
It also helps Democrats that by ousting Sen. Al Franken and Rep. John Conyers, and by (mostly) cheering as the litany of offenders in Hollywood and the press have gone down, they can authentically claim the moral high ground on what may have become the most salient social issue of our time.
And in a reversal from 2016, the politics of race seem to be working in the Democrats’ favor these days as well. Turnout among African-Americans has spiked, while falling among whites in most of the special elections that have happened this year.
Looking forward to 2020, it’s too bad for Democrats that there isn’t a charismatic candidate who is ready-made to capitalize on this environment. Oh wait, there is.
David C. Barker does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
0 notes
weeklyhumorist · 7 years
Text
Lost Pages From the Steele Dossier
Note: This piece has been adapted from a recently completed novel about the 2016 Presidential Election, From the Campaign Trail or Thereabouts.
The following transcript was found within a classified dossier covertly obtained from the Kremlin.
[DATE: 2/2/2016]
PETROV: Thank you for agreeing to meet with me, Mr. Trump. We regret your loss in the Iowa caucus yesterday.
TRUMP: We?
PETROV: Your, shall we say, sympathizers in Russia.
TRUMP: Oh, of course, of course. You know, the people love me. There’s no question about that.
PETROV: Take off your hat, sit for a while.
TRUMP: What hat?
PETROV: Never mind. Just sit.
TRUMP: You see the legs on that waitress?
PETROV: десять
TRUMP: I should come back to this joint when I’m looking for my next wife.
PETROV: Yes, yes.
TRUMP: Ten years or a hundred thousand miles. A good rule of thumb, I tell you. They get all grabbed-out after that.
PETROV: Yes. Mr. Trump, I would like to congratulate you on the campaign you have run so far. We in Russia have been quite impressed.
TRUMP: You are going to be so impressed. You’ve never seen winning like how we’re going to win, Petrov. We’re going to win New Hampshire. We’re going to win California. We’re going to win Iowa.
PETROV: Mr. Trump, Iowa—
TRUMP: I threw Jorge Ramos out of a press conference. People like strength, Petrov. They like strength, and they like good television.
PETROV: And Russians certainly appreciate a strong leader such as yourself.
TRUMP: So, so strong. You know how many people watched the Celebrity Apprentice? More people than watched the Oscars. Horrible show, the Oscars. Completely overrated. Robert Pattinson is a horrible presenter. He should have dumped Kristen Stewart in 2012, I told everybody.
PETROV: Yes. Mr. Trump, we believe there are significant areas of potential—
TRUMP: She cheated on him like a dog, and she’ll do it again. Such a disgusting woman. A lesbian now, I hear. A lesbian. I mean, have you seen her in a tank top?
PETROV: Mr. Trump, Russia has shown you much generosity. As I am sure you remember, our country has been there to assist you in your moments of need.
TRUMP: Absolutely. Nobody could find the number for that agency, Petrov. You guys came through.
PETROV: For too long, our countries have failed to understand each other. For nearly a century, we have regarded each other with hostility and competition. And for what reason? You yourself have enjoyed a very splendid and productive relationship with Russia and her people.
TRUMP: Such beautiful women in Russia. Gorgeous women. And I’ve been with many of them. Many of them. Many women. You ever stay at the Ritz? Terrific, terrific hotel. So many beautiful women, I’ve met at the Ritz.
PETROV: We are aware, Mr. Trump.
TRUMP: After the election, maybe you could send over a couple women for Trump TV. We’ll need anchors. They don’t have to know how to read. We’ll get a big name to read the news.  Someone terrific. Wayne Newton. And the women, maybe they can hula hoop or something while we run a news crawl on the bottom.
PETROV: Mr. Trump, we wish to help you in this campaign.
TRUMP: Of course. Everyone wants to help me. I get so many phone calls. I get phone calls everyday, from people asking, how can we help you? But I don’t take their money. I do not take their money.
PETROV: Mr. Trump, there are many ways we can assist you.
TRUMP: I actually do take the money. You wouldn’t believe how well that line plays, though.
PETROV: Mr. Trump, we can offer you financial support and many other types of support, as well. However, there must be some conditions.
TRUMP: Right, I know. Nobody can know about Trump TV until after the election. Here’s what Roger says. We say I was robbed and I should have won, then we announce Trump TV. Maybe right before Thanksgiving. You know Roger, right?
PETROV: Mr. Stone and I shared a very productive afternoon on Mr. Deripaska’s yacht, yes. He is, how you say, very well connected.
TRUMP: Yeah, real standup guy, Roger.
PETROV: Yes. He is a great friend of many, as our country has been a fast friend to you. And Mr. Trump—
TRUMP: Did you see his wife? Those jugs have a life of their own, let me tell you.
PETROV: —Mr. Trump, there are many ways for friends to repay each other.
TRUMP: Oh, don’t worry about that, Petrov. Trump TV is going to be so, so successful, we’ll get that all taken care of. I am a winner, Petrov. I don’t back down.
PETROV: Yes, Mr. Trump. That is a start.
TRUMP: Just tell everyone to sit tight for a few months.
PETROV: Mr. Trump, our relationship has moved beyond simple dollars and cents, mere loans and accounts.
TRUMP: Terrific. You are gonna love this TV station, Petrov. Just wait.
PETROV: Let me be clear. The Russian government holds information about your activities in Russia that would be extremely damaging to your, how do you say, “brand,” if it were to become public.
TRUMP: No doubt about it, I have had some tremendous times in Russia. Just terrific. One time, at the Ritz, I stayed in the Presidential suite, where Barack and Michelle spent their trip. Let me tell you. Let me tell you. I hired some—
PETROV: Mr. Trump, you hired shlyukha, as we say in Russia. Prostitutes.
TRUMP: Right, and they peed on me. It was tremendous. Let me tell you, Russian prostitutes—they have the best urine. The best. It must be all the vodka. Potatoes, you know?
PETROV: Now, of course, if the American media—
TRUMP: And they do the best things to their vaginas. Totally, totally smooth. Incredible. Like a little girl’s. Reminds me of when the nanny used to give Ivanka baths.
PETROV: We believe, if such a story were known by the American people, not only your electoral chances, but also your business fortunes, would suffer irreversible harm. In Russia, Mr. Trump, we call this “Kompromat.”
TRUMP: You know that they were from a service, right? Top notch girls. Nines, tens. These weren’t just women from the street.
PETROV: Yes. This service was a front for the FSB, you understand.
TRUMP: Okay, so, what was your point? I paid them, didn’t I?
PETROV: Actually, there is still an outstanding bill for—
TRUMP: One of them got nervous and couldn’t pee. I’m suing her.
PETROV: Mr. Trump, the Russian government is prepared to release—
TRUMP: I mentioned this was at the Ritz, right?
PETROV: We will release the videotape of these events, unless you agree to certain conditions.
TRUMP: Right. For one, I want a copy of the tape.
PETROV: The Russian government will work to secure your electoral victory, with the understanding that, once elected, you will approve a change in policy toward Russia and help the Kremlin to erode the American government from within through mismanagement and corruption.
TRUMP: Oh, you don’t need to tell me. The people running this country are so, so corrupt. I’m a businessman, Petrov. I will make the best deals. I will call China and talk to China. I will run this country like one of my businesses. You can depend on that.
PETROV: That is precisely our hope, Mr. Trump.
TRUMP: I am a draw, Petrov. Did you see me on Saturday Night Live? I hosted it. They told me it was the highest-rated episode they had since the week after 9/11. I was very, very funny. A lot of people called the next day to say that I should host the show regularly.
PETROV: Mr. Trump, we hope to be in touch again. Until then, consider our offer. You can reach me through my associate, Paul Manafort.
TRUMP: Oh, you know Paul? Terrific guy. Balls like a horse’s ass.
PETROV: Yes, he was instrumental in the recent elections in the Ukraine. A very hard-working individual.
TRUMP: Oh, believe me. Not as hard-working as me, of course. Not as hard-working as me. But a very, very good guy.
PETROV: The time will come when it will be appropriate for him to join your campaign team in an official capacity, but for now, we will proceed with your current staff.
TRUMP: Sure, sure. Hey, listen, did Putin get the case of breath mints I sent him? Those are from Mar-a-Lago.
PETROV: I am uncertain of that detail.
TRUMP: Tell him, next time a girl goes down on him, put one of those in her mouth first. Incredible, Petrov. Let me tell you. Just incredible.
PETROV: Yes, Mr. Trump. Thank you for your time.
TRUMP: Like someone stuck a battery jumper cable on your penis. Just incredible.
Lost Pages From the Steele Dossier was originally published on Weekly Humorist
0 notes
nofomoartworld · 7 years
Text
Hyperallergic: Carol Rama’s Resistant Desire
Carol Rama, “Appassionata” (Passionate, 1940), watercolor and pencil on paper, 9 x 13 3/4 in (23 x 35 cm) (© Archivio Carol Rama, Turin; Collection Fondazione CRT per l’Arte Moderna e Contemporanea and GAM Galleria Civica d’Arte Moderna e Contemporanea, Turin; courtesy Fondazione Torino Musei; photo by Studio Gonella)
I went to see Antibodies, the Carol Rama exhibit at the New Museum, at 11 o’clock on the morning after the show opened. I had anticipated crowds but was surprised to be one among a very small group of visitors, seemingly made up entirely of Italian tourists.
When I went to the counter to purchase my ticket, I was informed that, because the majority of the museum was closed, in the process of being setting up for new exhibits, and only the Carol Rama show was open, the entrance fee was reduced. “Do you still want to buy a ticket?” the seller asked.
After I said yes and purchased my half-price ticket, I made my way up to the exhibit along with the Italians, in what felt like a private tour of the museum’s inner staircases.
Carol Rama, “Maternità” (Maternity, 1966), mixed mediums on canvas, 35 1/2 x 27 1/2 in (90 X 70 cm) (© Archivio Carol Rama, Turin; photo by Gabriele Gaidano)
In other words, my introduction to the Carol Rama show was a series of interventions that felt like outside forces (or, rather, inside forces) warning me not to enter, or to enter with caution. Were I less pragmatic, I might read these interventions as intentional, a kind of performance informing my entire experience of the exhibit, rather than a series of strange and surprising short circuits. Either way, the interruptions felt organic to the show, due to the interventions in the reception of Rama’s work and the subsequent violence done to her legacy — her being made invisible as an artist. As Paul Preciado writes in the catalogue for The Passion According to Carol Rama, a 2014–15 exhibition at the Barcelona Museum of Contemporary Art:
Invisibilise, discover and reduce to an identity: these are three epistemological operations that the hegemonic discourse of art history has deployed to construct the norm. In the case of Carol Rama, these three critical operations explain the non-place that her work has occupied in museum discourse, anthologies and spaces of exhibition until today, and also make intelligible why it has been so difficult to create a space in which the artist can, in the words of Boris Groys, be considered “a comrade of our time.”
One of the ways artists are made invisible is when the mainstream art world ignores them, because they don’t adhere to current trends, don’t fit into certain identity categories such as “feminist,” or, conversely, are not affiliated with a recognized group of artists such as the surrealists, minimalists, and so on, which tend to be comprised of mostly men. When one of these artists is then “discovered,” they’re labeled as an “outsider” or otherwise marginalized further, while the art historian or critic who discovers her becomes, akin to an anthropologist, a kind of savior, labeling the artist with specific identities or beliefs and silencing her and her original intentions in the process.
Carol Rama, “Epifania” (Epiphany, 2003), graphite, pastel, watercolor, and enamel on canvas-backed paper, 17 3/4 x 12 3/4 in (45 x 32.5 cm) (photo by Andrea Rossetti)
In Rama’s case, she first received high-profile attention from Italian curator Lea Vergine, who included her in L’altra metà dell’avanguardia, 1910-1940 (The Other Side of the Avant-Garde), a 1980 exhibition bringing together the work of more than 100 women artists. According to Preciado:
In the catalogue … Vergine names the artists as ‘genius experimenters’, stating that ‘many of them were Jews, homosexuals, others were not alien to the experience of madness of having passed through the madness of the world.’ … The exhibition was therefore not about the ‘other side of the avant-garde’ but rather about its constitutive outside.
In this way, Rama was ushered into the canon under the direction of Vergine, relegated to a specific identity — woman, outsider, insane — and her own voice was muffled.
Instead of attempting to fit artists into preconceived categories, we might push away our desire to “understand,” which is just another way of saying: make the artist’s work align with our own beliefs and aesthetic values. So that rather than view Rama’s work through the lens of insanity or psychoanalysis, the outsider artist, female victim, feminist, or sado-masochist, we simply see the work. And, when doing so, we ought to assume the highest intelligence of the artist — that Rama knew exactly what she was relaying and what she was leaving out. When we do this, we can see the work as it was meant to be seen — without interventions or negations, simply as it is.
Installation view, Carol Rama: Antibodies at the New Museum, New York, 2017 (photo by Maris Hutchinson / EPW Studio)
The exhibition takes up one whole floor of the New Museum, featuring over 100 of her works from 1940 through 1999, including textiles, paintings, drawings, and assemblages. Throughout the installation, the curators have posted swaths of contextual background on Rama’s life. This choice, though generous, forces biographical readings of the work. In addition, quotes from Rama appear throughout the show — another thoughtful move on the part of the curators, and yet, because the artist’s words have been cut from context, they further encourage one or another biographically centered interpretation of her work. Such incisions into the lives of artists who don’t fit neatly into the normative narrative change how we read their art. When this cutting occurs — removing prices from the picture, pasting in other pieces of the artist’s biography, bits that help present a more cohesive, though not an altogether organic, whole — another, additional violence is done to the artist. How, I wonder, might Rama’s work appear without any biographical background. Or, conversely, with all of it?
Fortunately, it is not possible to reduce Rama’s work to one discrete topic, nor is it possible to single out her style. Making my way through the exhibit, I was surprised by the constant movement: from figurative to abstract, from what appeared to be one idea to another. This piling up of various images and styles, of different themes and forms, is in itself a kind of defiance, a resistance to reduction.
Carol Rama, “La Mucca Pazza” (The Mad Cow, 1998), inner tube, acrylic, and pencil on mail sacking, 22 7/8 x23 1/4 in (58 x 59 cm) (© Archivio Carol Rama, Turin; photo by Pino Dell’Aquila)
Carol Rama, “Nonna Carolina” (Granny Carolina, 1936), watercolor on paper, 9 1/2 x 13 3/4 in (24 x 35 cm) (© Archivio Carol Rama, Turin; Collection Fondazione CRT per l’Arte Moderna e Contemporanea and GAM Galleria Civica d’Arte Moderna e Contemporanea, Turin; courtesy Fondazione Torino Musei; photo by Studio Gonella)
Such versatility manifests even within individual works. For example, on first glance, the watercolor “Nonna Carolina” (Granny Carolina, 1936) appears, due its soft hues and the light touch of the medium, pleasing to the eye, almost like a scene from a children’s book or fairy tale. But upon closer inspection, the canvas is strewn with what appear to be amputated body parts or prosthetics. In the center, so pale it’s difficult to make out entirely, is a ghostly apparition of a woman’s torso, her face frozen in a grimace. Are the many limbs hers? Is the female figure a carcass? Is the scene culled from memory, a dream, or neither? The work’s pale hues and subject matter cancel one another out, and in doing so, they resist simple interpretations. In a broader sense, Rama’s watercolors counter her paintings of nude bodies, of amputated penises and vaginas, as well as her assemblages. In the last group, her piece “Le tagliole” (The Traps, 1966) is a stunning construction of the hide of a fox coated in gold enamel. The shining orb suggests a sun, or an amorphous cell, with the face and arm of the dead animal centered in a sea of browns, golds, and reds.
Carol Rama, “Le tagliole” (The Traps, 1966), hide and enamel on canvas, 23 5/8 x 19 3/4 in (60 x 50 cm) (photo by Tommaso Mattina)
These moves back and forth — from delicate watercolors of amputations to the cruelty, or what might be seen simply as the reality, of a carcass — this almost manic motion between styles and genres is consistent in the work of Carol Rama. In interviews, when asked questions that clearly reveal an intent to fix her in the available art historical roles of “feminist,” “madwoman,” or “outsider artist,” Rama always refused.
Yet the artist did have a lingering focus: the depictions of bodies as vulnerable and often at risk, in hospital beds, in wheelchairs, ill or amputated. Jennifer Griffiths explains the historical context for this in the essay “Erotically Engaged: Carol Rama’s Politically Defiant Bodies”:
With its motto, “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State,” the Fascist government in Italy legitimized its intrusion into the private lives of citizens. Fascism labeled nonstandard bodies as enemies of society and the practice of defining and disciplining individual bodies and sexualities came to be viewed as fundamental in building social consensus and national identity.
These non-normative bodies — seen by the state as abhorrent and, therefore, vulnerable to discipline — appear throughout the exhibition. They are our bodies, the bodies of many of us. As Precadio writes:
In this inventory of the unacceptable body we find the mentally ill and the sexually deviant as well as the physically or psychologically deficient. These are precisely the sick and institutionised bodies that the work of Carol Rama visibilises and celebrates through a vitalist and sexualised representation, which serves to reclaim them as political subjects who act and experience pleasure.
In the end, because Rama did or could not make artwork that conformed to cultural norms — because she depicted bodies and lives that mirror many of ours, not those of the people in power — her work and she herself were not recognized. This is the price of making art not meant for kings and collectors, but rather aligned with one’s own desire.
Carol Rama, “Appassionata” (Passionate, 1939), watercolor on paper, 11 1/8 x 9 in (28.3 x 22.7 cm) (© Archivio Carol Rama, Turin; photo by Gabriele Gaidano)
Carol Rama: Antibodies continues at the New Museum (235 Bowery, Lower East Side, Manhattan) through September 10.
The post Carol Rama’s Resistant Desire appeared first on Hyperallergic.
from Hyperallergic http://ift.tt/2qgI2iG via IFTTT
0 notes
avanneman · 7 years
Text
When Republicans collide: Trump versus Congress
Remember back during the primaries when we Democrats felt all we needed to do was stand back and watch while the Republican Party destroyed itself? That didn’t work out so well, did it?
Now we’re at Round 2. President Trump’s “budget”, such that it is—a 9.2% increase in defense coupled with a 9.2% cut for “everything else”—is the sort of budget someone who knows nothing about Congress would draw up. The idea is to make these things balance, right? Problem solved!
Well, no, because the problem is, federal budgets balance interests, not dollars. You can’t increase your program by cutting mine. You have to increase your program while increasing mine. Which is why federal budgets are so hard.
It’s “amusing” that “serious” men—I guess they’re all men—on the Republican side of the aisle in Congress are upset that Trump isn’t proposing to cut entitlements—Social Security and Medicare. Trump ran by promising not to cut entitlements, but so did House Speaker Paul Ryan, #DCprettyboynumberone, and so did all the Tea Party Republicans, and all the non-Tea Party Republicans. During their campaigns, Paulie and all the others promise to “protect” Social Security and Medicare, and then after they’re in they vote for fake budgets promising to make cuts, but not, you know, now—10 years from now.1 In other words, they’ll “order” a future Congress—10 years down the road—to make the cuts they lack the balls, or vaginas, or whatever, to make now. And they call that cutting entitlements.
Trump and Ryan are having similar problems “abolishing” ObamaCare. The situation is still “fluid”, as we say in DC. I am, naturally, hoping this will turn into a total trainwreck, but that’s probably too much to hope for. Trump is, basically, swallowing the entire Republican Party.2 What the resulting engorgement will look like is anyone’s guess. And whether it can fly is another. And whether we will still have a country left when it’s over is still another.
TRUMP SPEECH UPDATE How did Trump's Omigod he sounded like a president speech change things? Very little. Trump left out most of the bluster, but all the incoherent substance—spend like a motherfucker and cut taxes like a motherfucker—remained intact. Trump sans spittle is still Trump, and Republicans still don't know how they're going to do all the things Trump has said he's going to do.
As Jonathan Chait points out, while Ryan, and other Republicans, talk up cutting "entitlements", the Republicans in the House as a whole have only voted for cutting Medicare. Social Security is still off limits. ↩︎
The standard tactic of the swallowees is to point to stupid statements by leftists, which are not hard to find, and proclaim that the freaks make Trump look good! Hey, he must be doing something right! And, anyway, it’s kind of cozy in here, like being inside a whale! And all my friends are here too! ↩︎
0 notes