Tumgik
#id rather not receive death threats <3
iviarellereads · 5 months
Text
Fugitive Telemetry, Chapter 1
(Curious what I'm doing here? Read this post! For the link index and a primer on The Murderbot Diaries, read this one!)
In which we get to fill in some more gaps in the timeline.
Murderbot scans a dead human, and determines they've been dead for probably about four hours. Mensah seems skeptical, even after receiving MB's report on how it arrived on that figure, and watches Indah for her reaction. MB sees it on the feeds from its new intel drones, rather than its own vision.(1)
The corridor isn't very well-traveled, but it is a weird place to get killed. Anywhere on Preservation Station would be, come to that. Accidental death is close to nil, and the overall threat assessment for murder is at just 7%, the lowest it can be anywhere people and MB are.(2) And yet, a dead body, on the floor.
Just as Indah's finished the report, and is also skeptical, a tech comes in, saying they estimate time of death about four hours ago. Indah sighs. MB asks if there's an ID, since the dead person's feed interface is broken. The tech, Tural, looks to Indah for permission first, then confirms there was nothing scannable on or in the body to indicate ID.
Indah looks dissatisfied, so Tural says they have to wait for Medical to scan the body to match against visitor entry log scans, and Medical isn't here yet because it's the school's preventive health check day. Indah asks if Tural told them it's an emergency, but they say they did, and Medical said it's only an emergency until a pronouncement of death.(3)
Mensah stops Indah from going too much on a rant about what she'll do, and says she'll talk to Medical, as planetary leader, to convey that it's not accidental and it is an emergency. The ports have been closed, at least. She also asks Tural if they're sure the dead person is a visitor, or if they might be local. Tural says they assumed visitor, but no confirmation.
MB interprets Mensah's face to mean she doesn't think anyone's doing a very good job of this. MB thinks Station Security is out of its depth, since Preservation is typically so peaceful. Indah doesn't look much more impressed, and tells Tural to keep working on an ID.
Tural takes off to escape the blast radius before Indah blows up, and Mensah's look grows more pointed. Indah throws her hands in the air and says fine, she'll go talk about it. So, Mensah, Indah, and MB leave the corridor, and step behind a plant in the nearby junction.
MB scans the area for listening devices, and Indah asks if it has experience with murders. MB admits to some. Mensah privately asks MB if it thinks this was GrayCris. It thinks maybe, but tells her it doesn't have enough info yet.
Still privately, Mensah asks it to work this investigation with Station Security.(4) She adds that it will be a great opportunity, even if it's not about GrayCris. MB replies that they don't want it, but Mensah suggests it could help improve MB's relationship with Station Security and thus Preservation Alliance, if it wants to call it home. MB knows she's right, but it doesn't like it.
Indah is waiting for them to finish whatever private conversation they're having and Mensah's still staring MB down, so it answers Indah's question more thoroughly: yes, it has experience with murder investigations in controlled circumstances. There's some discussion of how "controlled circumstances" means "corporate slave labor camps", before Indah asks if MB is willing to work with StatSec.
MB thinks for a couple pages about how its actual memories of those situations are fuzzy, because they were pre-memory-wipe, but it has watched lots of mystery media, so it probably has 30 to 40% useful knowledge.(5) It asks if they'll increase Mensah's security, per their ongoing debate. Indah says she's increasing every security level, including Mensah's, and doesn't need to be told her job.
Mensah clears her throat and asks Indah if an employment contract will be invoked. Indah says yes, if only to keep "the terrifying solicitor" (Pin-Lee) off her back. MB still doesn't know a lot about being a participant in a contract. It asks if it can examine the dead human now, and Indah asks it to call them "the deceased" or "the victim", please, but leaves before she receives an answer.
She missed Mensah mouthing the words stop it at me. (I guess the feed isn’t adequate for all forms of communication, particularly those that involve a lot of glaring.)(6)
=====
(1) Placing this distinctly after Home. (2) The comment about uninhabited planets still being 7% once Murderbot lands on them is just gold, perfection, no notes. (3) When your main sources of death are accidents and intoxication-related aggression, that probably seems like a really smart triage of resources. Just, y'know, to be fair. (4) The book name explanation comes shockingly early this time: fugitive telemetry is the use of telemetry (recording data at various points) to locate a fugitive. So, it's just a reference to the plot being a murder investigation. They can't all be ten-dimensional chess! (5) This is the most hilarious thing to me in this whole chapter, because it's the CSI effect. (6) I beg to differ. Miki used the feed with emoticons. They can convey an awful lot. 😄🫡😒😡
8 notes · View notes
whqtsername · 3 years
Text
here are some snk hot takes that nobody asked for; no i don’t take criticism. 
- let’s start off easy: the main reason why people hate Gabi/Mikasa but not Falco/Eren is because of Mysoginy 
- if Erwin was alive, he wouldn’t support the rumbling lmao
- Guren no Yumiya is BY FAR the best op
- careful with shipping goggles, they may make you see things that aren’t actually in the text
- speaking of shipping, yes its really fun but you should never fucking send death threats to people over it??? and fighting over ships is fucking stupid.
- ok another one on ships: the only ships that are actually in the text, and are relevant to the plot of the story are: eremika, aruani, YUMIHISU (reciprocated), jeankasa, farugabi, beruani (one-sided)
- no im not saying you can’t ship non-canon things, i also do that and its one of the most fun parts, but god please don’t let the ships fog ur judgement of the series
-if you support GENOCIDAL EREN, i dont fucking trust you. I don’t care if its fictional, if you take a look at Eren’s actions and say “yeah thats justified i support the fact that he’s killing millions of civilians” you’re misinterpreting the whole fucking thing 
- Stop fucking saying eremika is incest, we’ve discussed this a million times. She lived with the Jaegers for one year after her parents were brutally murdered, she was never formally adopted. Besides, they both canonically have feelings for each other, and chapters 50 and 123 would not have fucking happened if they saw each other as siblings. It’s 2021, read the manga properly and get over yourself.
- Levi made the right choice when he decided to save Armin over Erwin
- Stop saying Mikasa should already be over the fact that they’re gonna kill Eren, he’s (along with Armin) the only one she has left, he’s the man she’s been in love with for YEARS, and it’s completely understandable that she’s having trouble coming to terms with the fact that hes gonna have to die. 
- Historia is a lesbian lol
- Connie is really fucking strong and he’s constantly underestimated i’m tired of it.
- please, take a chill pill. go outside. touch some grass. (this one applies to me too, i feel like we could all benefit from it)
 that’s it i think. i know the fandom is more visceral and rabid on twitter, but i wanted to share my opinions; feel free to disagree with me lol
12 notes · View notes
shirtlesssammy · 3 years
Text
3x14: Long-Distance Call
Guys! We have a special surprise next week!! (Hint: We finally get to recap the gay angel episodes again!) Until then, enjoy our last episode for season 3...
Then:
Tumblr media
Sam’s saving his brother no matter what
Now:
On a stormy night, a man drinks alone, contemplating life. His phone rings. It’s Linda. Ben tells her he can’t. “My wife.” He hangs up the phone. It rings again. Linda pleads with him. She loves him. He hangs up again. The phone rings AGAIN. He slams it down repeatedly and tears it from the wall. IT RINGS AGAIN! Damn, Linda, you are persistent. To stop the ringing, Ben pulls out a gun and shoots himself. 
Dean tells Sam they have a case. Sam tells Dean that they’re on a case --his. Dean balks at that because they’ve got nothing. Bela’s gone, the Colt’s gone, and Dean would rather work a case they can solve than wallow in his imminent death. 
Tumblr media
They head to Milan, Ohio. They head right to the dead guy’s house and interview his widow. She’s a little belligerent but tells them that there was blood everywhere (Oh, that’s why she’s belligerent), favorite scotch was out, and the phone was ripped from the wall. 
Sam asks to look at the crime scene. He goes through the caller ID. Dean asks about strange phone calls. She admits that a couple weeks prior she picked up on a call that Ben was on. It was static. No one was there. 
Research time!
Tumblr media
Dean finds out that “Linda” was Ben’s high school sweetheart --and she died in a car accident. On top of that, she was cremated. On top on top of that, Sam discovered that the caller ID on the phone traces back to a phone number used a century ago! (I presume Sam did all that research while he stared out the window.) 
They head to the bowels of the phone company to find fly infested, porn addicted Stewie. I’m going to skip over all this but will laugh at the ad that said “Order now & receive a bone-us gift!” Sam asks Stewie to trace the old-time number. (Natasha: flames on the side of my face at this damn offensive porn franchise.)
Tumblr media
Dean pulls out the threat level 5 on the guy and the guy finds some results. There’s different houses that all received a call from that number. 
Sam heads to investigate one house. He poses as a phone company employee. He asks about strange phone activity. The man that answers the phone says that they haven’t had any issues. Sam notices the daughter looking concerned in the background. 
She pops outside to call his bluff. She wants to know why he was asking about the phones. He gives her a little give and she admits that she’s been talking on the phone with her mom --who’s dead. 
Dean checks in with similar stories. Then he gets a call. It’s the static-y voice of John Winchester. 
Tumblr media
Later at the motel, Sam wants to know more about Dean’s call. Dean gets all nervous boy about it possibly really being their dad, and what they should do about it. What should Dean say? Sam, ever the pragmatist, suggests, “hello.” It’s funny, but I guess not really because Dean walks out on his brother. 
Dean comes back with a reason why things are happening here. It’s the birthplace of Thomas Edison, and there’s a museum with Edison’s spirit phone. 
Tumblr media
They take a tour but the phone doesn’t have any EMF. They’re stumped as to what’s happening. 
Later that night, while Sam slumbers, Dean stays awake to answer his phone. John calls again. He asks Dean how he could sell his soul. “I was looking after Sammy like you told me to.” (Boris screams into the void) John tells Dean that the demon that holds Dean’s contract is in Ohio. 
Meanwhile, the daughter from earlier is IMing a friend when she gets a message from her dead mom. The mom says she wants to see her. The girl is scared but her mom reassures her that she’s with her. Then the girl’s computer flickers out and in the reflection of the monitor, we see the girl and her mom. 
The next morning, Sam returns from interviewing Lanie, the haunted daughter, to find Dean obsessing over demon omens. He shares his intel with Sam. 
Tumblr media
Dean’s pretty sure the demon who owns his contract is following him. I pull a Dean voice to say, “Why are you so obsessed with me?” only Dean’s actual line in the show is “My ass is too sweet to let out of sight.” God. This show. Sam tries to tell him that the demon-killing exorcism that John gave Dean over the phone might not be as advertised. Dean’s a believer, though. He’s got faith in John! (Just gonna take a li’l writing break to tear at my hair.) 
Sam heads back to watch over Lanie, but before he goes the Winchesters hold an emotional shouting match. Dean’s ready to stop the demon from coming after him once and for all and thinks that Sam’s reticence is just more head-butting with their (now dead) dad. Sam accuses Dean of having “blind faith” towards his father and I weep. Sam leaves with one request: that Dean stay put until he returns from seeing Lanie. So. That’s going to go well. 
Tumblr media
Lanie explains to Sam what’s been going on - that her mom’s requests have extended beyond the normal grieving cemetery visit. We cut to a young kid playing in his room. His toy phone rings. “Hi, mommy!” he chirps. 
Cut to Dean “Single Man Tear” Winchester sitting dramatically by his phone. It rings. 
Lanie reveals to Sam that her mother’s ghost told her to kill herself. When Sam hears the ghost’s catchphrase, “come to me,” he realizes that they’re dealing with something else entirely. 
While Sam experiences revelation, Dean heads off alone following his dad’s orders. f r o w n y f a c e. He ends up in a quiet, suburban home.
Meanwhile, Lanie’s brother Simon (of the toy phone fame) has gone missing. Sam saves him just in time from getting pancaked by a truck. As soon as the kids are buttoned up back home, Sam calls Dean. He tells him that a crocatta is after the people of the town. It’s a scavenger that lures grieving people and eats their souls. It tends to dwell in filth. Dean recalls the flies at the phone company, so Sam heads out on a hunt. (Meanwhile, YES, Dean’s off having his own questionable adventures, setting demon traps in a nearby house.)
Tumblr media
Sam calls Dean for backup before assaulting Stewie, the phone guy. “I know what you are and I know how to kill you,” Sam says to the terrified guy. Someone looms behind Sam with a baseball bat. It’s Clark, the manager! He takes out poor soft-headed Sammy. Unfortunately, Clark takes out Stewie too. 
They both wake up tied to chairs inside the building. Clark kills Stewie and then fangs out. He unhinges his jaw and sucks out Stewie’s soul. Yummy? Clark then lays his hands on the phone console...because it’s time to kill Dean!
Elsewhere, in a police locker room, a man’s phone rings. It’s his daughter. “I know who killed me, daddy,” she says. The girl’s voice tells him that her killer is at their house right now. 
Clark explains to Sam that spoofing John Winchester was incredibly easy. All he had to do was find their phone numbers, then John’s old numbers. That let him listen to voicemails, read emails, and easily find the weak links that led him to target Dean. Oof. (Side note: a crocatta would make a seriously amazing private detective in an alternate Supernatural where monsters have better meal restraint.) 
Dean stands ready at the suburban house - ready to kill a demon. The grieving officer heads home, ready to kill his daughter’s murderer. 
Tumblr media
Dean’s jug of holy water is met with an angry father with a shotgun, so things start out really well. They quickly devolve into a dirty fist fight. 
Meanwhile, the crocatta continues to villain-monologue at Sam.
Tumblr media
Technology, Clark says, makes it so much easier to target people. They’re connected - yet isolated and easier to pick off. (I scoff at this overdone oversimplification of the role of “technology” in society. I hate when people try to pretend the past was trouble-free.) Sam finds his argument weak as well, and punctuates that by breaking free of his bonds and attacking Clark. 
At the house, Dean disarms the grieving cop and reveals the demon trap below the carpet. He starts reading out the exorcism. To his horror, the guy walks right out of the demon trap. When the guy accuses him of killing his daughter, the pieces click for Dean.
Sam kills Clark by jabbing his head into a retail hook suspended off the wall. OH I SEE, this show has always been obsessed with death by hook. >:| 
Dean and the officer avoid killing each other. Instead, they despair in beaten silence together, before we cut to Dean holding a compress to his forehead back at the motel.
Tumblr media
Sam and Dean go over the case back in the motel, but talk quickly switches to EMOTIONS. Sam apologizes to Dean. Dean admits he was wrong. “I wanted to believe so badly,” he says. STORY OF HIS LIFE DAMN IT. He admits that he’s terrified of dying. Terrified of Hell. 
Sam gives him sad puppy eyes. “There’s nothing wrong with having hope.”
“Hope doesn’t get you jack squat,” Dean tells him.
For Sad Boys with Poor Coping Mechanisms Science:
Tumblr media
Call Me By Your Quote:
I just talked to an 84 year old grandmother who's having phone sex with her husband, who died in Korea! It redefined my understanding of the word 'Necrophilia'
That’s what happens when you mess with the phone company, dillweed
 Want to read more? Check out our Recap Archive!
29 notes · View notes
evesbeve · 4 years
Note
Hey there, you said your ask box was open for Justin Min's whole thing? I guess I just slept through the whole thing, honestly - could you just go over a gist of everything that happened? I get that it seems like a PR team didn't know how to use twitter (which, mood) and f-ed things up for him, but what were they "cleaning up" in the first place, who's Anna what did they do that warranted such a bizarre thread from the PR team, etc...? 😳
Hey! Okay so this is going to be a lot, so buckle up.
Right off the bat, I just want to say that Justin isn’t cancelled. The situation has been mostly resolved right now (more on that later).
So around a week ago, Justin Min started deleting his replies to fans. Depending on whether you’re on Twitter or not, you might know that Justin is one of the most interactive people of the cast. He knows a lot of fans by name, he has inside jokes with us, and he just interacts a lot with his fanbase. So you can imagine why him suddenly starting to delete his replies was a bit upsetting. There was nothing we could do about it though.
And suddenly, two days ago, Justin deactivated his account out of nowhere, which caused all kinds of drama to go down.
People started pointing the finger at specific accounts saying it was their fault that Justin deactivated (don’t even get me started on that logic; why a grown-ass adult deactivate because of a few teenagers is above me, it literally made no sense), even sending death threats. Others suspected that he got suspended because Twitter’s algorithm saw all these tweets get deleted and was like “welp, bot time.” Long story short, lots of misinformation was going around.
And then out of the blue, Justin’s account was reactivated, and he made a thread directed at Anna.
Now, who is Anna? Anna is a stan on twitter, whose @ I won’t be sharing for privacy, but here’s how they’re relevant in this:
Remember when I mentioned the inside jokes? Well, one of them was between a fan called Matt and Justin. Matt kept commenting on Justin’s tweets asking him to say trans rights. On the one year anniversary of Matt asking Justin to say trans rights, Justin finally said it. Then, Matt made a poll asking other stans what he should have Justin say next, and lesbian rights won.
Around a month ago, Matt replied to one of Justin’s tweets, and Justin responded with something along the lines of “haha, i know this is just an attempt to get me to say lesbian rights,” referencing the inside joke. People started commenting that the way he phrased it was a bit :/ so then he replied to his own tweet with something like “well, i’ll delete this before i get cancelled,” and that’s when things spiraled.
Tumblr media
[id: Justin Min’s tweet #1: i see that you are trying to butter me up to say lesbian rights, nice try, matt. nice try.
Justin Min’s tweet #2: oh, here we go. this is an inside joke between myself and matt, if you’ve been a part o fthis fandom for more than a few weeks. but alas, i will have to delete this now before i’m cancelled by the end of the day. keep loving, everyone.]
Lesbians get spoken over and looked down upon not only by straight people, but also the LGBT community. So when Justin tweeted that, lesbians were like “this sounds as if you care more about your own self image rather than our community.” Then, non-lesbians got involved and started either a) calling Justin lesbophobic (which lesbians never did) or b) blindly defending Justin and saying he did nothing wrong.
(Side note: I am not a lesbian, and I’m not trying to speak over lesbians in this situation. But I did talk about this to some of my friends who are lesbians, and they told me that what Justin did wasn’t as big of a deal as Twitter made it out to be. These are their words, not mine. All I know is that it was definitely not bad-intentioned, just a huge misunderstanding.)
Anyway, Anna made a thread explaining to Justin why him defending himself came out as harmful towards the lesbian community, and then Justin apologised and that was it.
Which brings us back to yesterday (26/9/2020).
Everyone is freaking out, posting misinformation, panicking. I don’t exactly,,, know how, but the #justinminisoverparty hashtag started being used for actual hate towards Justin for deactivating, and some people (including Anna, though I think their tweet was in the context of a joke? please take this with a grain of salt though. update: it was in the context of a joke) mentioned that Justin is a lesbophobe.
A few hours later, Justin reactivated his account, tagged Anna, and said this (though it was actually his PR team, more on that later):
Tumblr media
[id: Justin’s Tweet: @ [redacted] quickly jumping back on here from my twt break because i’m receiving messages that you’re continuing to spread misinformation, so i want to clarify.]
Tumblr media
[id: Justin’s Tweets: 1. all of my interactions with you were deleted because of the need to set clear boundaries due to the fact that your incessant messages and replies from multiple accounts over the last several months were veering into stalking/harassment.
2. for someone who appears to pride themselves on reminding their friends/followers on a daily basis to be careful of the language they use on this app, you seem to be fine with flippantly labeling someone as homophobic/lesbophobic as if they’re cute little adjectives to give to someone, not realizing that such labels have real-life consequences.]
Tumblr media
[id: Justin’s Tweets: 3. also noting here than in your original thread, you stated that you neither considered me nor my words to actually be lesbophobic, so a bit confused as to why your story has suddenly changed.
4. i realize you’re young, so i’m genuinely hoping you use this opportunity to learn and grow andbe a little more mindful the next time you decide to tweet.]
The next twenty minutes were pure chaos. Justin deactivated again, everyone started freaking out because that was very out of character for him. People were cancelling him because this could have easily been resolved in DMs, or tweeted without the mention of Anna (a minor) from a mainstream Twitter account.
And then, Justin Min DMed another fan on Instagram (her name is Em) about the situation.
Who is Em? For starters, I’d like to say that I personally know Em and that she’s one of my best friends. I’ve known her for more than a year now, and I can personally vouch for her. Everything that she posted is 100% true (if you want the thread where she posts proof of the DMs, please send me a different ask because I’m scared tumblr will not post this in the tag if I include it here).
The reason Justin DMed her out of all people is because he also kinda knows her? As I mentioned, Justin interacts with us on Twitter a lot, and Em is the one person he’s responded to the most, so he knows who she is. (He’s tagged her more times than other cast members, at least before all his tweets were deleted by his PR team.)
Anyway, this is what Em tweeted:
Tumblr media
[id: Em’s tweets: please read this !!!
justin dmed me on instagram and basically the gist of it is that he hired a pr team and they tweeted the thread at anna without knowing everyone could see it. all of the tweets being deleted/ him deactivating was also them.]
Below is the image Em attached to the tweet:
Tumblr media
[id: Justin’s DM to Em: hey. this is justin. i’m just hearing about what’s happening on twitter right now. for context, i was asked to work with a team of people to “clean up” my twitter in the past few weeks. they’ve taken the liberty of deleting a bunch of my responses and posts in order to safeguard me (whatever that means) as well as deactivating my account to comb through other things.i believe they accidentally sent anna a message and mistakenly believed the function for her to comment only would mean that she would be the only one to see it as well. needless to say, i’m no longer working with this team and want to personally apologize to her. do you know any way i can get into contact with her?]
And then, in a follow-up tweet:
Tumblr media
[id: Em’s text at Justin: sorry for dming you again. is there any other way i can help? i just feel really bad about this whole thing and i know how quickly this stuff can spread if it’s not taken care of
Justin’s text: i mean, i guess you can share the information i’ve given you? it’ll take a bit of time for me to take back ownership on everything as i sever ties with that team, so maybe the sooner the better people know.
Em’s text: okay ! is it okay if i tweet a screenshot
Justin’s text: sure.]
Then Justin’s account got reactivated an hour ago (almost 24hs after Em’s tweets), and he tweeted this:
Tumblr media
[id: Justin’s tweet: hi. it’s me. thank you for all your messages. this has been an incredibly tough week for me on multiple fronts. some things you might already be aware of; many other things you don’t know about.asking for a bit of privacy as i take sometime to unplug. hoping to be back soon.]
And that’s all, I think? There’s lots we don’t know about what happened yet, so please please please try not to spread misinformation. This is a stressful situation for us on Twitter, and especially for Justin, and misinformation going around is the last thing we need right now.
tl;dr: Justin Min hired a PR Team that started deleting all of his tweets and deactivated his account. Misinformation started spreading, people started cancelling Justin for no reason. The PR Team decided to respond to Anna, made the response public, deactivated again. Justin DMed Em and explained the situation, and an hour ago, he reactivated and said he’s taking a small break to sort things out.
If anyone has any other questions/clarifications, my askbox is open! Hope this shed some light on the situation <3
UPDATE 28/9/2020: Justin has DMed and apologised to Anna for the situation, and Anna has accepted the apology. Anna posted all of it on their account, but again, if you want a link, send me an ask!
70 notes · View notes
Text
In Defence of Team Purple Lion
Voltron: Legendary Defender and its final season remains as one of the most poorly received children’s shows in the past decade. The show was a reboot from DreamWorks of the popular Voltron franchise owned by WEP LLC (World Event Productions) who were responsible for the first version of the show Voltron: Defender Of The Universe (1984), an adaptation of the anime show GoLion by Toei Animation. It initially started strong when released in 2016, with a premise that of a typical mech-centric kids’ show; 5 pilots of 5 robot lions coming together to form one big robot (Voltron) to fight against a big bad alien villain in space, however despite the formulaic appearance it proved to be a captivating watch with detailed and beautiful animation as well as surprisingly deep subject matter. The themes and messages of the show touched on darker topics such as racism and genocide with the backdrop of a complex portayal of war while still balancing it with the light-hearted and goofy dynamics of the diverse main characters, played by a diverse cast. Produced by Lauren Montgomery and Joaquim Dos Santos, both of whom had worked on the acclaimed Avatar: The Last Airbender and Legend Of Korra, the story set up promised an equally deep and intricate story for VLD as had been the case for ATLA and LoK, as a result the show attracted a large and varied fan base beyond just children, many fans adults eager to see how the story and darker themes would be resolved as well as how the minority representations would be treated.
The final season released on Dec 14th 2018 came as a great shock to fans, not only were they intensely dissatisfied with the ending, virtually no one from any area or sub fandom was happy with the season as a whole and at the time of this article’s writing it has lower than a 6% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. The show and its producers faced massive criticism over insensitive representations of minorities, an unsympathetic and condemning end for an abuse victim despite redemption for their abusers and a disempowering arc for the main woman of colour character in which she was sidelined and dismissed by her male counterparts up until her sacrifice. The core themes and messages of love, forgiveness and acceptance regardless of race were completely subverted, instead conveying to an impressionable Y-7 and above audience the opposite; heritage and race define a person rather than their own actions. As well as fans, many parents of kids who watched the show expressed unhappiness with the final season due to the toxic and regressive messages it sent. Soon after the season dropped a petition emerged to “free the original season 8 of Voltron” due to the belief that the final season was in fact an edited product of what the creators originally planned. This belief was sparked by visual inconsistencies in the season itself, the audio description not lining up with the action on screen (now fixed), one character not being played by her voice actor but her voice actually another character’s with the pitch turned up as well as comments from the cast and animators, now deleted. The strongest claims of edits were made by Tumblr user Leaking Hate in her initial meta Chasing The Ghosts Of Season 8 and the follow up, a more detailed breakdown, Seek Truth In Darkness in which she presented an alternative story that had been edited and cut down for reasons then unknown, with narrative and visual evidence from the season itself to support her argument. She and a few other fans officially came together in February 2019 to form Team Purple Lion, a team of analysts dedicated to finding the truth behind the disaster of the final season. However, since the fandom had had a poor history of harassing the show’s creators over ships (romantic relationships between characters) most attributed the poor story and resolve to an attempt to keep things neutral romantically between characters in a poor bid to please everyone. As a result the petition and campaign were merely linked to lack of shipping satisfaction for the fandom and dismissed as more toxic fandom behaviour that had been displayed previously by many fans.
Petitions and campaigns like these are not uncommon after a show or film’s ending, similar situations might be the HIMYM backlash in which fans were so unhappy with the ending of the show that there was a petition for an alternative ending, as well as the petition to Warner Bros regarding the Snyder Cut of Justice League. Both of these have actually succeeded with the Snyder cut of Justice League set to release in 2021 and the HIMYM DVD box sets containing the alternative ending, however what makes the Free VLD s8 campaign now led by Team Purple Lion unique is its claim that there’s an original finished product that the creators intended for release but was edited after completion to produce the poor final season that was released on Netflix. Often corporate meddling in creative works is common but it has not been documented before as a post production occurrence changing the finished work, it’s always taken place pre-production as was the case with Disney and Colin Trevorrow’s original script for ep. IX or during production, in the case of Justice League and Zak Snyder.
Since the start of the campaign in Dec 2018 there’s been continuous investigation and action taken by TPL to provide proof for their claims and the movement has evolved into a fight for creators’ rights, still active now a year and a half on. Their investigation early on resulted in discovering the IP holder (those who own the trademark) WEP as the ones with control over the show and therefore responsible for the released edited season 8. They’ve since defended DreamWorks and the showrunners from criticism in favour of requesting WEP and specifically President Robert Koplar, self proclaimed “steward of the property” for the original season 8 by the showrunners that was not released. There’s also been strong advocation from TPL to keep the protest against WEP’s interference with the creative team’s work peaceful to avoid dismissal and belittlement due to prior instances of the VLD fandom’s toxic behaviour that often included harassment of showrunners and toxic fan behaviour ranging from abusive remarks online to death threats, after the final season rumours were flying and the EPs faced abuse from upset fans so there was an active effort to stay civil on TPL’s part. 
TPL and the #FreeVLDS8 movement has continuously faced criticism and backlash since its start regardless, the response from fellow fans ranging from supportive to downright disbelief and even the showrunners stating publicly [March 28th 2019 Let’s Voltron podcast] that there’s no “alternate cut of Voltron” branding the idea as a “conspiracy theory”. Claims of harassment have been attributed to TPL and the legitimacy of their allegations questioned, one fan questioning the possibility of the edits’ execution as well as others categorizing them as fans creating a theory based on shipping fulfillment. The controversy and consistent campaign a year and a half on interested me greatly, therefore after being led back to the movement by the very comments discrediting them I approached Team Purple Lion for comment on the aforementioned claims as well as conducting my own research and investigation into them. 3 members of the team, Crystal Rebellion, Dragon Of Yang and Leaking Hate spoke to me openly about their campaign and my own research produced some interesting results as well. 
The basis of their argument is set on the show’s final season being an edited product, when I asked about what pushed her to this conclusion and writing her initial meta Leaking Hate explained that a mutual friend of Crystal and her’s drew their attention to it through the story saying: 
“It’s interesting, nearly ALL of the episodes had a moment or two in them where Lotor [male villain] COULD have reappeared, and didn’t. Do you think he was written in to be the savior all along, and it was the higher ups that said no, good boy Lance [one of the main characters]? It seems like, given the narrative, and even given this season, it should have been Lotura [Lotor and Allura ship name], and all that wasn’t just feels… off. And not as a Lotura stan, I mean in general.” 
“And YES I had. There was a narrative gap where Lotor should have fit, but for some reason wasn’t.” Hate said, “The initial conclusion we jumped to was that Lotor had been removed in the writing stage.” 
It wasn’t until another friend mentioned a key scene out of place in the story and she went back to view it that she started to suspect the season had been changed from its original state. The scene in question was one in which Lotor says “Follow me!” at the end of Allura’s dream sequence in s8 ep8 Clear Day, despite his death being established before and after this point in the story. “There was no reason for that Follow Me shot to be there,” Hate explained, “unless the action of the viewer following Lotor had been removed.” Having studied a Fine Art degree and therefore well versed in animation and visual art she was able to recognise scenes that had been edited unusually throughout the season once she actively searched for other visual evidence. The Follow Me scene as well as others she found are displayed in her Ghosts meta, all indicating a different story from the one told in the show, along with the evidence Leaking Hate presented some initial ideas on what the story was (a redemption arc for Lotor and several sub arcs for the main characters that resolved their stories and previously set up story beats).
Tumblr media
[Image Description: A close up of Prince Lotor’s face from season 8 on Netflix, staring directly out of the picture at the viewer. There are subtitles showing his speech at the bottom of the image, saying “Follow me!” End ID]
After Team Purple Lion’s formation Leaking Hate went on to publish a part two to her initial Ghosts meta, a 21k word meta entitled Seek Truth In Darkness which contained all visual evidence of edits found in the season as well as an extrapolation of the initial story indicated by said edits. The original story appeared to resolve unfinished narratives and arcs that the released s8 dismissed and the treatment of the representations in the show better, from respect towards minorities to an empowering arc for Allura, the main female character. Despite the original season having a more positive story, negative feedback from fans has been more common than positive. When I questioned the team members on it Leaking Hate mentioned “most people who believe we’re wrong tend to think we’re wrong in our premise” Dragon of Yang confirming that “it’s usually the premise of “VLD was edited after completion” that people disagree with”. However the screenshots they present as visual evidence hint at some truth in their argument, the first screen cap shown below indicative of some poor edits made to the animation since 3 characters are essentially cropped out of the picture.
Tumblr media
[Image description: A split-screen from season 8 on Netflix, featuring from left to right: an Altean pilot, Merla, Keith, Hunk’s shoulder, Pidge, the top half of Allura’s face, and the top half of Lance’s face. End ID]
Likewise this screen cap shows a split screen visually unbalanced with 2 characters at the bottom partially cropped out as well as the character on the left side with a much larger screen space than the other characters.
Tumblr media
[Image description: A split screen from season 8 on Netflix, featuring from left to right: top left Shiro, below him is Keith in a larger section and Allura in a small triangular section below and to the right of Keith’s section. In the middle is a section showing Honerva’s mech stabbing the Voltron-Atlas mech with purple lightning shooting out. On the top right is Hunk, below him is Pidge, and below her the top half of Lance’s face. End ID]
Seasons prior to the final had always had visually balanced split screens with each character centred in their frames appropriately, indicating these and other s8 shots like them as an anomaly.
Hate reconstructed both screencaps based on what she believed they were originally:
Tumblr media
[Image description: A split-screen from season 8 on Netflix, featuring from left to right: an Altean pilot, Merla, Keith, Hunk’s shoulder, Pidge, the top half of Allura’s face, and the top half of Lance’s face. On the top, right, and bottom of this screencap is dark pink background with the black lines of the split-screen extending to the edges of the colors, marking out where the rest of Hunk, Allura, and Lance should be visible if the view had not been cropped. With the lines extending out, Keith’s portion of the screen is also extended, leaving a completely removed section of the split-screen remaining, which is highlighted purple in this image. End ID]
Tumblr media
[Image description: A split-screen from season 8 on Netflix, featuring from left to right: top left Shiro, below him is Keith, below and to the right of Keith is Allura in a small triangle section, the bottom of her face slightly cut off. In the middle is a section showing Honerva’s mech stabbing the Voltron-Atlas mech with purple lightning shooting out. On the top right is Hunk, below him is Pidge, and below her the top half of Lance’s face. On the left, right and bottom of the screencap is a dark pink background with the black lines of the split-screen extending to the edge of the colours, marking out where the rest of Lance and Allura should be visible if the view had not been cropped. Keith’s portion of the screen is smaller and a small dark pink section to the right separates his portion from the middle. Below him where his portion originally extended to is a section coloured dark purple that extends a little further to the left of Allura’s portion. End ID]
Other noticeable examples include scenes with the female lead Allura where her proportions do not match with any prior drawings of herself indicating that she was another character redrawn, Leaking Hate suggested Lotor as his proportions fit each instance. 
Tumblr media
[Image description: 2 pictures of Allura in the Blue Lion from a front and centre angle side by side. On the left Allura has her eyes closed and her arms stretched out holding onto the controls, the entire cockpit is glowing blue. On the right Allura’s eyes are open with a determined look on her face, she’s slightly hunched with her arms gripping the controls, the cockpit is coloured normally. End ID]
The image on the left is of Allura from s8 ep13 and the one on the right from the same episode a few minutes later, scaled so the interiors (which are unchanging 3D models) are the same size. She is notably taller in the one on the right with her head reaching above the seat and her frame bigger, with wider shoulders and thighs.
These are just a few out of the many examples of edits made that Leaking Hate presents in her metas along with her reconstruction of the original season based on what each edit indicates. While the reconstruction is to some point subjective, the visual inconsistencies are clear and can be easily checked by watching the show at each point said to be edited.
The timeframe and possibility for the edits’ execution, called into question by a fan on a twitter thread (now deleted) stating “it’s not physically possible to make that many edits in 2 months and with leftover budget”, was also addressed by the team and their work. Leaking Hate clarified that “it wasn’t 2 months” that they took place in, “it was 6. The edits began in mid July”, a fact determined by voice actor Jeremy Shada mentioning in an interview released on July 23rd that he had gone in to record new lines at the time. Hate also said, “It’s less of a question of would they have time than it is, well. They did do it. It was nearly impossible. But the fact that it is done shows that they did.” She went on, “I think people misunderstand when we claim it was ‘edited’. They hear “it was reanimated”, but it wasn’t reanimated. There is NO new animation in the edited s8 at all. As far as I can tell, 99% of the edits are composed of tracing, clever cuts and sleight of hand.” This is backed up by all the visual evidence they present as well as their work, claiming absence of animation (making the story disjointed and incoherent in places) rather than new, additional animation changing it. 
Crystal Rebellion added, “One thing that strikes us (I feel pretty confident speaking for everyone in this case) is that Studio Mir [responsible for animating the show] is impeccably flawless with their work. Their previous work before Voltron: Legendary Defender, and even Seasons 1-6 and most of 7 are beautifully animated. Stunning. Season 8... is not. Studio Mir also had a viewing party for VLD: S8 - and they reported that they loved the final product; so the animators saw Season 8 after it was completed. The season, however, that aired, was really shoddy animation, rough transitions, music mistakes, and what appear to be alterations to still images - it isn't their usual quality of work, and moreover, the animators have stated that they don't recognize what aired. Often we've been asked something like 'Maybe they just didn't know what scenes they were animating' or 'Didn't know the intended finished product' but in this case, it is documented that they saw the final season and that it's different from what was aired. The poor workmanship in what we see from S8 - all the edits Hate goes through to find and explain, coupled with Mir's disbelief, is indicative that the animation studio had no idea this happened. That means it 1) Happened post-production and 2) It wasn't the Studio that changed anything. Dos Santos mentions in an interview [March 4th ABTV] that they were cut and pasting mouths and moving frames around - no time, no budget, and no staff left. It was all them, after it had been completed - after Mir had seen the original rendition and loved it, that all this happened. The parallel point to that to further support it is, had this been written in the script from the beginning, we would've seen a flawlessly animated season with a painful storyline. We don't see that.” 
Although Mir’s reaction to the season they viewed in October (before its official drop) has since been deleted, one animator’s response to the season 8 that was released on Netflix is still online, comparing the show to a house and stating that “every single brick of the last season is very upsetting” but “everything else is good” (translation can be found here), making it clear he was not pleased with the final product. Joaquim Dos Santos does also mention in the interview Crystal references that changes were made to season 8 after season 7 dropped, stating, “You can probably see it in the animation. If you really pay attention it’s like, it’s literally our editor cutting out mouths and puppeting different dialogue.” It’s documented that the epilogue was added to s8 late after s7 dropped however it does not have any dialogue, this statement paired with Shada’s about “still recording on Voltron” begs the question, what change was made besides the epilogue? Hate shows in her Darkness meta that Shada’s character Lance was used to replace Lotor as well as Allura in key scenes, if Shada was still recording lines (unusual since audio recording is done very early in animation production) then it would have been for these moments.
Not all criticism has been based on the editing premise however; the story they present as the original has garnered negative comments as well since it featured Lotor, a divisive character due to his moral ambiguity and previous condemnation as a killer, and predominantly focused on his redemption as well as relationship with Allura. The narrative makes it clear that Lance, the blue paladin and one of the main characters popular with fans, would not have been the focus as he was in the released season and would have been replaced by Lotor as Allura’s partner. When I brought up the claims of bias in their reconstruction Leaking Hate pondered on it. 
 “Do I love the story because it is Lotura, or do I love Lotura because the story makes me love it?” she mused, “I think it's all the same. I was able to pick out the original story because of my bias in favour of Lotor, Allura, and Lotura. Had I not been invested in those characters, and that ship, I would have had no reason to look. I am not reconstructing based on wish fulfillment, or what I want to see,” she asserted, “but the story I am finding happens to be a story that I love.” In regards to Lance and her analysis on him she stated bluntly, “I HATE Lance. Were I reconstructing based on wish fulfillment I would have him alone and miserable. But that is not a good story. The real story of OGS8 has Lance coming to love himself and to learn to accept Allura's friendship as equally worthy as her romantic affection. It has him grow into a good man, and it has him become Allura's right hand when he helps her save the man she loves. It is an uplifting and wholesome message for little boys and grown men alike. And I think it is equally important that we save S8 for Lance as it is that we save it for Lotor and Allura.” When I mentioned that some would find her dislike of Lance an argument against her she also added that “they are right to.”
“I would not trust someone claiming to have found the 'real' story if I knew they hated Lotor or Allura.” However she admitted, “I don't hate him all the time. I think, if the Lance we get in OGS8 is the Lance I believe is there, then I will find him tolerable, if irritating.”
While it’s true that Hate is critical of Lance and his character, the reconstructed story she presents in Seek Truth does reflect her words, giving him an empowering and sympathetic arc growing from his previous immature and womanising character into a selfless, respectful friend. The team have also put their efforts into creating and realising the story in their reconstruction of the original s8, Rise and Atone, and so far it has stayed true to what they’ve promised, addressing characters and their arcs, the only deviation made being a romance free conclusion in a bid to stay ship-neutral. Dragon of Yang explained the narrative decisions they made with R&A stating clearly, “If this was wish fulfillment, we would have stopped at one detail or another. Every character’s arc was halted and destroyed beyond reconciliation or catharsis. Every character deserves their story to be done justice, and open-endings give that catharsis VLD originally had while remaining respectful to everyone’s shipping preferences. VLD is a story of hope and growth, to deny that a character has grown since day 1 is to deny that there is a story there to be told, and that in turn denies a person out there - who likely identifies with that character - the feeling of being seen. The best thing we can do as scholars and as activists,” she concluded, “is try to recreate the vision the staff had originally made and do so with care and attention to the work they put into every line.”
As for the harassment claims attributed to Team Purple Lion by both fans and The Voltron Store on twitter, there’s not much to support them, and in fact a great deal to disprove them. The team has maintained a level of professionalism in both their work and in their conduct online, consistently citing sources and providing proof for claims as well as campaigning respectfully. Hate commented, “they seem to be conflating our protest with the general hatred being thrown around in the fandom. We've made a point to emphasize polite but firm protest and advocate reaching out through official channels.” While there is a lot of anger and hate from fans towards the show and the producers, none of it has been from Team Purple Lion. Their protest has continuously avoided and often defended the producers and voice actors, who have been regularly attacked by other fans during the show’s airing and since due to the poor conclusion, all of whom TPL have made clear are under NDAs and cannot comment freely (although it’s worth noting, they stopped actively promoting the show on their social media after the season 8 release). Instead their questioning has focused on WEP, the company who own the Voltron trademark, after discovering through a meta analysis of a VLD episode signs that they were meddling with the creators’ vision of the show and ordered them to change it against the producers’ wishes. While it was only a speculative piece, WEP’s quick reaction to the release of said meta by claiming through their Voltron Store twitter that they “do not have any influence over the creative direction of the show” despite ignoring fans for months after the season release suggests some truth to it. Twitter user Eros compiled all evidence of their involvement since then in a Twitter thread and the majority of it is damning, their denial directly contradicting statements from the voice actors and producers prior to and after s8 that confirmed they were the controlling party and had creative input, as well as the creators’ desire to tell a progressive and empowering story however not being able to because of “other controlling parties” outside of DreamWorks. WEP have also made contradictory statements to fans about the season, saying that “nothing was edited” yet agreeing with a fan that a lot was left out and a director’s cut would sell well, as well as mocking another who left a Facebook review (March 16th 2019) complaining of being hung up on, replying to them that an “imposter” answered their phones:
Tumblr media
[Image description: A facebook review of The Voltron Store. Text from the top reads as: 
Reviewer (name coloured out) doesn’t recommend The Voltron Store. 
Review reads: Terrible customer service. They literally hung up on me mid sentence and it was clearly not a case of a call accidentally being dropped. Extremely disappointed by the lack of professionalism!
The Voltron Store’s reply to the reviewer: if you actually talked to us you would find we are very nice people! And we never hang up on anybody EVER - unless they make outrageous claims like Power Rangers is better than Voltron!
The reviewer’s reply: The Voltron Store I did speak to a woman who identified herself Stephanie briefly, but I will never speak to your company again. Thank you for the response but I don't appreciate being called a liar. Please see the attached screenshot for proof of my abruptly ended call back in January. I desire to have no further communication with your company now, I simply decided finally other people deserved to know my personal experience.
Below is a screenshot showing the reviewer called The Voltron Store’s number.
The Voltron Store replied: We do not have a Stephanie here. That must be the issue: you dealt with an imposter! We would review the security cam footage but it does not go back 2 months. End ID.]
In stark contrast to WEP, Team Purple Lion has responded to criticism and addressed it, as well as reaching out to media outlets to clarify and correct poorly sourced claims, however have been faced with no response. Their questioning of WEP and their requests for the original season 8 on social media have been civil; their replies to the Voltron Store posts on Twitter containing no insults or cruel remarks, the harshest only critiques on the company’s lack of tact promoting a show and its merchandise that many considered offensive and toxic due to the last season. “At no point did we set out as some kind of campaign to “attack WEP” or “demand a new season”,” Crystal Rebellion said. “We were a handful of people looking at what amounted to, to use a metaphor, a puzzle that had technically been assembled but most of the pieces didn’t match up properly. We eventually decided to take the pieces that didn’t line up and look at what the picture was supposed to be. There was no ulterior motive - we just wanted the truth. When we realised the truth and it became obvious early on that Mir had seen the original season, we became convinced there was an unedited s8, perhaps in Mir’s backup drives. People saw it, which means it was a completed product, so it became a campaign to ask for it, it’s what the fandom wants, it’s what is profitable.”
In the face of all the negative response and disbelief, Team Purple Lion have gathered an overwhelming amount of evidence to support their case, not only from the show itself but also corroborating statements from the production team and cast as well as WEP’s conduct in response to the campaign. As a result TPL have gained a great amount of support and followers from the Voltron fandom, and are still gaining more a year and a half later. “I gotta give a shout out to Cosmic Royalty,” Leaking Hate said, “a group of Russian fans who reached out to us asking if they could do translations of our work. We host their translations on our website now and there’s apparently a group 500 strong on the Russian social media site VK that supports the work we do together!” Violet Howler on Tumblr has also been a big supporter as well as new fans, recently revealing themselves in the wake of good news, the fight to get the original season seemingly won as Leaking Hate displayed in her most recent meta. In it Hate outlines evidence for the franchise’s ownership changing hands from WEP to DreamWorks and therefore the release of the original season, based on the recent repromotion of the show through articles, new merchandise from the store and the new store designs that all suggest the release, since there would be no other reason to promote a show that was a PR disaster, so universally hated. Regardless of all the opposition and discredit they have faced, confirmation of the truth of Voltron’s original season 8’s fate is expected this summer before the official art book is made available, in the form of the season’s release itself. Whether the fans will be happy with it is another story, however Leaking Hate emphasised firmly that fan satisfaction was not the point, or at least not entirely. “Nothing is perfect, and nothing will please everyone. Especially a show like VLD, with almost 35 years of legacy and fans behind it. There are people who will not like the original season, there are even some who will prefer the edited one - I’m sure the WEP executives are some of them. But it will be the season it was supposed to be, the one that was a labour of love. There is so much love and care poured into every frame of VLD, this was a story that the people working on it wanted to tell; it was more than just a job to them. It was created with love, and it was with love that we fought for it, and when it comes down to it that’s what VLD’s meta narrative was about: love.”
135 notes · View notes
movedyoakkemae · 3 years
Text
the accords // rewrite.
In accordance with the document at hand, I hereby certify that the below mentioned participants, peoples and individuals, shall no longer operate freely or unregulated, but instead operate under the rules, ordinances and governances of the aforementioned United Nations panel, acting only when and if the panel deems it appropriate and/or necessary.                                                                                                             - Canon Accords
                                    Canonical Overview
Following the events of Johannesburg and Sokovia, the U.N. constructed a panel that drafted the Sokovia Accords. Their purpose was to mandate what missions the Avengers ( and teams similar to them ) could participate in.
Although we only have the above notation from the official and canonical Accords, we do know that punishments for refusing to adhere to this newly drafted legislature ranged from internment to imprisonment without any form of due process.  
There is also canonical misinformation about the Accords within the MCU itself — namely that the Accords and the S.H.I.E.L.D. Power Index are involved with one another.
The Accords came into play in 2016 — canonically, the Index was already in play as of 2013. These two matters are not interchangeable or connected.
The Accords are an international response to the Avengers ( and teams like them ) entering foreign countries without legal authorization and acting with impunity.
The Power Index is an American registry of individuals with super powers that poses a civil rights violation over a technically unrecognized minority.
The Accords were presented to the Avengers on the 11th hour, providing them an extremely narrow window in which to defend themselves from a sanction that essentially conscripted the team into the service of the U.N. under penalty of internment should they refuse.
                                        Rewrite Overview
Following General Ross’ revelation of the Accords, a meeting was held amongst the Avengers to attempt some manner of reconciliation with the news and formation of a game plan.
Tony ( @yoakkemae ) and Steve ( @holmesdepot ) determined that although the Avengers did need oversight on international affairs, the Accords as they were presented and as they existed in their current form were in violation of their civil rights and made the Avengers beholden to political agendas that they were not part of.
Tony reached out to his legal team to see what could be done at the last minute to challenge the Accords and present an alternative.
The team chose to reach out to the International Criminal Court (ICC) and upon review, the U.N. Accords were dismissed for a number of violations, though the Avengers were far from out of the woods yet.
With input from Stark’s legal team (and discussion with the Avengers themselves], the ICC formed the new Sokovia Accords, which were then presented to the U.N. and agreed upon by the panel and the parties directly affected by the legislation itself.
In short, ‘Civil War’ is rewritten as a civil rights battle between the Avengers and the U.N. rather than a boxing match between Tony & Steve.
As it is canonical between the blogs of Satan & Holmes that Steve informed Tony of James Barnes' involvement with the death of the Starks in 2014, the use of Barnes in this plotline is nullified / addressed in other meta.
                                         The New Accords
What the Accords do:
Classifies the Avengers as an independent peacekeeping organisation based in the U.S. susceptible to ICC oversight and U.N. observation.
Requires the Avengers to gain proper consent of individual countries prior to entry.
                       a) The Avengers as an organisation has to request permission to cross                             borders into a country and receive approval from the government                             authority of the country in question prior to entry.
                                  i) This does not preclude the fact that the Avengers, like the CIA,                                       may run secret operations in other countries. Like with the CIA,                                       they just can’t be caught.
                                  ii) It is noted that this can lead to some issues where the                                       government themselves are working against the people, and                                       the people want the Avengers to come in but they “technically”                                       can’t because the governments did not grant them entry to the                                       country.
                                  iii) This is where the “ask forgiveness before permission” clause                                        can come in, affording the Avengers the ability to act under                                        their own authority under the conditional awareness that they                                        will but have to argue their case with the ICC regardless of                                        results.
Makes the Avengers accountable for property damage / civilian casualties.
                        a) If the Avengers enter into a country and the country themselves is not                             upset over any property damage and civilian casualties, then there is                             no need for the Avengers to explain themselves to the ICC.
                                  i) As the Maria Stark Foundation automatically gives support to                                      any people and country affected by the fallout of an Avengers’                                      attack, these settlements are often made without ICC                                      involvement.
                        b) However, if the country has grievances against the Avengers and feel                             that they didn’t do enough, or that damages could have been                             avoidable, they have to contact the UN to set a trial with the ICC                             with the Avengers.
                                  i) The Avengers have to state their case and talk about how some                                      of the damage was unavoidable.
                                  ii) The countries themselves have to state their case and talk about                                       how the damage could have been avoidable.
                                  iii) The ICC will then take both testimonies into account and render                                        judgement. Verdicts determine what the punishments be and                                        who bears the brunt.
Applies extradition rules in the event of trial or arrests of individual parties while operating outside their base countries.
                        a) As teams may not be composed entirely of natives to the                             organization’s country, these rules are in place to mitigate                             complications to the trial process.
                                  i) If the individual is a registered member of a recognised team                                      affected by the Accords, that individual is to be held by the                                      country under which the team is registered.
                                  ii) Regardless of the individual’s country of origin, they will be                                       temporarily classified an individual of their team’s country                                       until trial is concluded.
What the Accords do not do:
Have the Avengers be controlled by the U.N.
                        a) The Avengers are not going to be a U.N. organisation.
                            The primary purpose of the Sokovia Accords is to apply                              accountability to teams such as theirs delivered from an                              outside force.
                             As such, they get to argue their cases and explain civilian                              death and casualties in front of a minimal three judges from                              the ICC and a panel of the U.N. World Security Council.
                             It is the judges from the ICC that makes the final verdict.
                                  i) The U.N. World Security Council can be a bridge between                                      the Avengers and individual countries.
                                     The only instance where the U.N. itself can send the Avengers                                      to countries that do not want their intervention is if the Avengers                                      petition the need to the council after the country denies access                                      and a 3/4th majority                                      vote is made in the Avenger’s favor.  
                                  ii) In this event, the U.N. World Security Council would also have                                       to explain their reasoning to the ICC.
Prevent the Avengers from intervening in world-level threats.
                        a) If there is a world-endangerment-level-threat happening in a                             particular country, then the Avengers have the ability to go into                             said country without permission, but if everyone is still alive after,                             they do have to explain to the panel and the country why it was                             a world-level threat.
                            For the most part, the explanation is only really necessary if it’s not                             obvious that this was a world-ending threat. (most of them are really                             obviously a world-ending threat).
                        b) They do still have to explain how civilian casualties were unavoidable                             unless countries in question opt to exonerate the Avengers of their                             own volition.
Force them to share their secret i.d. with the world. 
                        a) In the case that a superhero on the Avengers team in question has                             has a secret i.d. and does not wish to share it with the world and/or                             the ICC and/or the U.N. World Security Council, then they must                             share their i.d. with at least one Avenger.
                                  i) It does not have to be that one Avenger has all the secret                                      IDs, and the Avengers do not have to tell the ICC or the                                      Security Council who knows the hero’s i.d., just that it is                                      known. 
                                  ii) The superhero with the secret i.d. in question is still held                                       accountable, but they will be held in court under their                                       superhero identity and will face consequences under                                       their superhero identity.
The Avengers themselves are still going to remain independent (well, as independent as they can be as a subsidiary of Stark Industries…), it’s just that the ICC will be needed for general overview and to give them accountability.
4 notes · View notes
azgedaspy · 3 years
Text
𝐀 :    𝐄𝐂𝐇𝐎 + 𝐕𝐈𝐎𝐋𝐄𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐂𝐘.
i came across this post   ( 1 )   and it got me thinking about echo + mercy.
echo does not partake in   gratuitous violence.      i understand where the misconception comes from.   she is a lethal,   high ranking warrior in a very violent culture.   when she plays the villain in season four,   she is set up to look threatening.   and,   let’s be honest,   the fandom goes above and beyond to paint her in the worst light possible.      but as a whole,   i don’t think this perceived malice is very honest to her character.      she will kill an ambassador who challenges her clan.   she will kill on her king’s orders.   she will kill to directly protect her people.   she will  not  kill or maim for minor indiscretions   ( 2 )   despite the   “ savage ”   stereotype put upon her.
we have seen her be merciful,      sparing lives when her clan can afford it :   bellamy, octavia, + pike,   octavia again   ( attempted; unsuccessful ).   in many instances,   she is   more   merciful than our protagonists.
she does not enjoy the violence.   she does not offer it unnecessarily.     it is necessary for her job, but it does not define her as a person   ( 3 ).      there are scenes where echo’s grief over her violence is openly displayed :  her conversation with bellamy after she thinks she killed octavia.   she is visibly distraught as she relays the information and even tries to comfort him,   telling him his sister had   ‘ a good death. ’      this does not erase what she has done,   but it does speak to her character  +  how she feels about the harm she inflicts.      it is unlikely that someone who feels this much guilt would be so frivolous about death and harm.
she also avoids making threats she is not willing to carry out.      as a foreign-born orphan,   echo had to   earn   her place in azgeda.   she did not do this by   ‘ being weak. ’      if echo threatens you or your loved ones,   she  will  follow through.      her mercy does not come at the cost of her credibility or respect.
( 1 )   “blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.”   “#ok i could go OFF#bc i remember seeing echo in freaking season 2 and being like#omg [...] id 100% ship them#especially after they had their conflict and she betrayed him i was like the enemys to lovers trope!! the GROWTH!! the rEDeMPTION!!! [...] #and echo's got a toooonn of potential as a character#which tbh is just kind of squandered by the writers#but their dynamic at the end of season 5 was actually really good and i liked it alot especially when they were fighting together#so basically what im sayin#is i really like echo   #and she's always been somewhat merciful#she's never taken pleasure in others pain and she's always sought to be as efficient#even when she tells bellamy that octavia died a good death#when she mercy killed that guy in the forest   #and in return she is shown mercy by being saved and brought into spacekru#*good for her* meme”
( 2 )   the boudalon ambassador challenging her in 401 was not a minor indiscretion.   the ambassador openly challenged azgeda’s right to the throne in front of the entire coalition.   this challenge would result in a war that would put echo’s clan   ( and every other clan )   at risk.   as we are told later,    echo doesn’t want war.   no one does.   as roan says,   taking one life to save thousands is good politics.   it is more merciful for echo to kill the boudalon ambassador than for her to permit a new war while the coaliton is still recovering from the last one.
( 3 )   it’s also worth noting that she did not fully choose this career,   either.   she was stolen from her home and trained as a child soldier.   the same clan that murdered her parents enlisted her in their military at age 08.   she is still responsible for her actions,   there is always another way and she could have defected,   but it’s worth noting that she was heavily coerced as a young,   traumatized child and had it not been for azgeda’s interference,   she may never have become a spy / warrior / assassin in the first place.   ( this note is not meant to imply that echo did not grow to appreciate her job, but rather to illustrate her lack of agency in how it came to be. )
3 notes · View notes
patriotsnet · 3 years
Text
How Many Republicans Running For President
New Post has been published on https://www.patriotsnet.com/how-many-republicans-running-for-president/
How Many Republicans Running For President
Tumblr media
Sen Tom Cotton Of Arkansas
How GOP retirements are making the 2022 midterm elections a Trump referendum
Cotton, 43, has been preparing for a potential presidential run since before the 2020 election even happened, visiting the first-in-the-nation primary state New Hampshire last year to campaign for local Republicans. I expect Ill be back to New Hampshire again in the future, he told Insider last October. The betting site PredictIt currently ranks Cotton alongside Pompeo, Rubio and Hawley.
Cotton represented Arkansas in the U.S. House for two terms before becoming a senator in 2015. His first brush with national prominence came in 2006 when he was serving in Iraq as an Army lieutenant. Cotton sent a letter to the editor at The New York Times criticizing their story about the U.S. terrorist finance tracking program. Cotton called for the paper to be prosecuted for revealing the program, and though his letter wasnt published in the Times, it was picked up by the conservative blog Power Line, which Cotton copied on his petition to the Times.
Another Cotton opinion piece did later make it into the Times. His controversial 2020 op-ed, headlined Send In the Troops about using the military and an overwhelming show of force against protesters and rioters following the death of George Floyd, led to the resignation of Times editorial page editor James Bennet. Cotton referenced the op-ed in January after the attack on the Capitol, and said in a statement that those involved should face the full extent of federal law.
What Is A Voter
The Top Two Candidates Open Primary Act, which took effect January 1, 2011, created “voter-nominated” offices. The Top Two Candidates Open Primary Act does not apply to candidates running for U.S. President, county central committees, or local offices.
Most of the offices that were previously known as “partisan” are now known as “voter-nominated” offices. Voter-nominated offices are state constitutional offices, state legislative offices, and U.S. congressional offices. The only “partisan offices” now are the offices of U.S. President and county central committee.
Elites Still Matter Enormously In Primaries
George H.W. Bush
Just when journalists and political scientists were ready to proclaim the death of parties in favor of candidate-centered politics, the pendulum started to swing back.
Over the past 35 years, incumbent presidents have had zero problems obtaining renomination even presidents like George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton who alienated substantial segments of the party base with ideological heterodoxy during their first term. Reagan and Clinton both passed the baton to their vice presidents without much trouble.
Insurgent candidates who caught fire with campaigns explicitly promising to shake up the party establishment Gary Hart in 1984, Pat Robertson in 1988, Jerry Brown in 1992, Pat Buchanan in 1996, John McCain and Bill Bradley in 2000, Howard Dean in 2004, Mike Huckabee in 2008, and Rick Santorum in 2012 repeatedly gained headlines and even won state primaries.
But while 1970s insurgents were able to use early wins to build momentum, post-Reagan insurgents were ground down by the sheer duration and expansiveness of primary campaigns.
Tactics that worked in relatively low-population, cheap states like Iowa and New Hampshire simply couldnt scale without access to the broad networks of donors, campaign staff, and policy experts that establishment-backed candidates enjoyed.
Its this invisible primary among party elites that truly matters.
Endorsements were better at predicting the outcome than polls, fundraising numbers, or media coverage.
Don’t Miss: How Many Republicans Are In Congress 2016
Fragment Of Lincoln Speech To Kentuckians
A fragment of President Lincolnâs First Inaugural Address is attached to this speech intended for Kentuckians, indicating that it was prepared prior to his journey from Springfield to Washington. The assumption is that Lincoln either planned to receive a delegation from Kentucky during his stop in Cincinnati, or to make a quick excursion into his home state to deliver the speech. The speech itself confirms Lincolnâs belief that there was nothing he could say to appease the South without betraying the principles upon which he had been elected.
Abraham Lincoln. Speech intended for Kentuckians, February 1861. Holograph letter. Robert Todd Lincoln Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress Digital ID # al0082p1, al0082p2
Bookmark this item: //www.loc.gov/exhibits/lincoln/the-run-for-president.html#obj23
Newsom Wins By A Little
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Defeating the recall by a narrow margin significantly less than his 24-percentage-point beatdown of Republican John Cox in 2018 could weaken Newsom as he heads into reelection next year.
If he limps out of this, there will be some blood in the water, said Steve Maviglio, a Democratic political consultant. Another Democrat will think they could do better and they can take him on.
Republicans who backed the recall could claim a kind of victory from weakening the governor, even if they failed to throw him out of office. Some of them already are.
Hes spent $80 million, hes in the fight of his life, hes called in the president and the vice president, said Anne Dunsmore, a recall campaign manager.
Hes taking it seriously and hes using a lot of resources to combat us Weve already won. Weve made our point.
A narrow win would also likely trigger lawsuits over the validity of the election results. Conservative commentators have already begun saying, with no evidence, that voter fraud will be to blame if Newsom wins. Former President Donald Trump issued a statement Monday calling the recall another giant Election Scam.
Elder has said he plans to file lawsuits over election irregularities. His website links to another site that asks voters to sign a petition demanding a special session of the California legislature to investigate and ameliorate the twisted results of this 2021 Recall Election of Governor Gavin Newsom.
You May Like: Can The Democrats Stop Trump
Emboldened ‘unchanged’ Trump Looks To Re
The set of advisers around Trump now is a familiar mix of his top 2020 campaign aides and others who have moved in and out of his orbit over time. They include Miller, Susie Wiles, Bill Stepien, Justin Clark, Corey Lewandowski and Brad Parscale.
While his schedule isn’t set yet, according to Trump’s camp, his coming stops are likely to include efforts to help Ohio congressional candidate Max Miller, a former White House aide looking to win a primary against Rep. Anthony Gonzales, who voted to impeach Trump this year; Jody Hice, who is trying to unseat fellow Republican Brad Raffensperger as Georgia secretary of state after Raffensperger defied Trump and validated the state’s electoral votes; and Alabama Senate candidate Mo Brooks, according to Trump’s camp.
Trump’s ongoing influence with Republican voters helps explain why most GOP officeholders stick so closely to him. Republicans spared him a conviction in the Senate after the House impeached him for stoking the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, House GOP leaders have made it clear that they view his engagement as essential to their hopes of retaking the chamber, and Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., was deposed as Republican Conference Chair this year over her repeated rebukes of Trump.
Those numbers suggest that Trump could be in a strong position to win a Republican primary but lose the general election in 3½ years. A former Trump campaign operative made that case while discussing Trump’s ambitions.
Republican Candidates Running For The Us 2020 Election
Bill Weld was married twice and has five children.
Weld ran for vice-president as a Libertarian on the Gary Johnson ticket in the 2016 presidential election.
As a conservative, Weld is strongly pro-choice on abortion issues.
The presidential race is on and the candidates are being whittled down to the very few. Who is running on the Republican side? Current President Donald Trump is going for re-election, and the only candidate now challenging him for election as president of the US this coming November 3rd, 2020 is Bill Weld, a former Massachusetts governor.
Also Check: Why Do Republicans Want To Take Away Health Care
Death Threats And Conspiracy Theories: Why 2020 Won’t End For Election Officials
Kelley said members of his staff have been followed and videotaped while picking up ballots from drop boxes in recent weeks.
“I’ve been doing this almost 18 years, and I would say the end of ’19 leading into ’20 and then all the way up to today has been the most stressful period of my career,” Kelley said.
Up until now, the fraud claims have been mostly isolated to national campaigns and the occasional statewide race.
But Jamie Shew, who oversees elections in Douglas County, Kan., said he worries the tactic could trickle down to local races, where margins are often extremely thin.
“Even in candidates were going to ‘there was fraud’ rather than it was a bad campaign,” Shew said. But “2020 took it to a whole new level. And I don’t think that’s going to go away.”
In Douglas County last year, for instance, a County Commission race was decided by just three votes. Both candidates running accepted the results after a hand recount, but Shew said he worries next time, they might not be so lucky.
‘americans Will See The Current Two Options Are Not The Choice’
Donald Trump to decide on 2024 Presidential run| White House | Latest English News | World News
Jade Simmons is a multi-hyphenated woman. A former beauty queen, professional concert pianist, motivational speaker, rapper, mother, and ordained pastor.
As she puts it, she is an unconventional candidate, “but these are unconventional times”.
“This seemed to me to be a time when we couldn’t afford to do business as usual,” she says. “I’m the daughter of a civil rights activist, and the way my father raised me was that if you see voids, if you see injustices, you need to ask yourself if that might be you that needs to be leaning in.”
She says her goal is to create equal access to opportunity, through economic, educational and criminal justice reform. And in that spirit, she’s aiming to run “the least expensive campaign in the history of our nation”.
“We think it’s abominable that it costs now almost a billion dollars to run for president when the qualifications are that you are 35 years old, a US-born resident, and have lived here 14 years,” says Ms Simmons. “We’d rather spend that money on helping people.”
Full coverage of the US election
While the Republican and Democratic nominees will be on the ballot in all states, independents must meet an array of state deadlines and access requirements.
“I know it sounds wild, given the history of independents! We believe that if we stay standing long enough, there’s still some more disruption coming in – that most Americans are going to see that the current two options are not the choice.
Read Also: How Did Republicans Do In The Primaries
Former Us Ambassador To The United Nations Nikki Haley
Haley, 49, stands out in the potential pool of 2024 Republican candidates by her resume. She has experience as an executive as the former governor of South Carolina and foreign policy experience from her time as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.
Haley was a member of the Republican Partys 2010 tea party class. A former South Carolina state representative, her long shot gubernatorial campaign saw its fortunes improve after she was endorsed by Sarah Palin. Haley rocketed from fourth to first just days after the endorsement, and she went on to clinch the nomination and become her states first female and first Indian-American governor.
As governor, she signed a bill removing the Confederate flag from the state Capitol following the white supremacist attack at the Emanuel African Methodist Church in Charleston. She left office in 2017 to join the Trump administration as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, and Quinnipiac poll found she was at one point the most popular member of Trumps foreign policy team.
I think that shes done a pretty masterful job in filling out her resume, said Robert Oldendick, a professor and director of graduate studies at the University of South Carolinas department of political science.
Haley criticized Trump following the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by his supporters, saying she was disgusted by his conduct. Oldendick said he thought her pretty pointed criticism of the president will potentially cause some problems.
Political Primaries: How Are Candidates Nominated
Article two, section one of the United States Constitution discusses the procedures to be followed when electing the president of the United States, but it does not provide guidance for how to nominate a presidential candidate. Currently, candidates go through a series of state primaries and caucuses where, based on the number of votes they receive from the electorate, they are assigned a certain number of delegates who will vote for them at their partys convention.
Earlier party conventions were raucous events, and delegates did not necessarily represent the electorate. Mrs. J.J. McCarthy describes her convention experience:
I can picture the great Democratic convention of 1894 at the old coliseum in Omaha right now I can hear the Hallelluiahs of the assembled. Oh how I wish I had back the youth and the enthusiasm I felt that night, I jumped on a chair and ask that by a rising vote the nomination be made unanimous, how the people yelled, how the packed gallories applauded, it cheers an old man now to think about it.
Politics played a big part in the life of this town years ago. Campaigns were hot, and there was always a big celebration afterwards. Votes used to be bought that is before the secret ballot was adopted. Some sold em pretty cheap. I remember one old fellow who sold out to one party for a dollar then sold out to the other for the same price.
Recommended Reading: Who Controls The Senate Republicans Or Democrats
Start Your Day With Laist
For nearly 25 years, Gov. Gavin Newsom rose the ranks of California politics without ever losing an election, buoyed by connections to powerful San Francisco Democrats and a willingness to take risks like sanctinoing same-sex marriage that put him at the vanguard of his party.
Then came the coronavirus pandemic.
The governors attention-grabbing style implementing the nations first stay-at-home order in March 2020, then dining at an exclusive wine country restaurant as he told people to stay home to avoid a winter surge rubbed enough Californians the wrong way that 1.7 million voters launched the second gubernatorial recall in state history.
And yet to fight back, the Democratic leader of one of the nations bluest states returned to what helped him succeed in the early days: connections to fellow Democrats and well-calculated policy risks this time, to fight COVID-19.
At a campaign rally in Long Beach on Monday night, President Joe Biden heaped praise on Newsoms management of the pandemic. Newsom this summer made California the first state in the nation to require vaccines for health care workers and state employees.
Gavin Newsom has had the courage to lead, to stand up for science, Biden said. Hes been one of the leading governors in the nation protecting people and vaccinating his state.
Can you imagine him being governor of this state? You cant let that happen, said Biden, who beat Trump in California last year .
Here Are The Republicans To Keep An Eye On For 2024
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Republicans are paying extra attention to a number of Republican governors, senators, and former officials that might consider making a run for president in 2024.
The contenders come from various contingents of right-leaning thought, and will be fighting to capture parts of former President Donald Trumps base. Whichever Republican hopeful prevails will not only become the Republican Partys nominee, but also help determine the ideological trajectory of the Republican Party in the post-Trump era.
Vice President Mike Pence
Its not uncommon for vice presidents to follow up their stint as second-in-command with a run for president. Former President John Adams, the nations second president, was Americas first vice president under President George Washington. More recently, President Joe Biden became the 46th president four years after he ended his eight-year tenure as former President Barack Obamas vice president.
Vice President Mike Pence might decide to do the same, but Pences relationship with Trump seems to be severely tarnished after Pence did not contest the certification of the Electoral College results, as reported by The Hill.
Senator Ted Cruz
Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz could run for president again come 2024 after he defended his senate seat in 2018 from Democratic challenger Beto ORourke. Cruzs bid for the presidency in 2016 ended in failure as Trump captured the Republican Partys nomination.
Senator Josh Hawley
Don’t Miss: Are There More Rich Republicans Or Democrats
Whos Running For President In 2020
Former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. is the presumptive Democratic nominee to challenge President Trump in the 2020 race.
The field of Democratic presidential candidates was historically large, but all others have dropped out. Mr. Trump had also picked up a few Republican challengers, but they have also ended their campaigns.
Running
Has run for president twice before.
Is known for his down-to-earth personality and his ability to connect with working-class voters.
His eight years as Barack Obamas vice president are a major selling point for many Democrats.
Signature issues: Restoring Americas standing on the global stage; adding a public option to the Affordable Care Act; strengthening economic protections for low-income workers in industries like manufacturing and fast food.
Main legislative accomplishment as president: a sweeping tax cut that chiefly benefited corporations and wealthy investors.
Has focused on undoing the policies of the Obama administration, including on health care, environmental regulation and immigration.
Was impeached by the House of Representatives for seeking to pressure Ukraine to smear his political rivals, but was acquitted by the Senate.
Signature issues: Restricting immigration and building a wall at the Mexican border; renegotiating or canceling international deals on trade, arms control and climate change; withdrawing American troops from overseas.
Ended her campaign in March 2020 and said she would back Mr. Biden.
0 notes
MScale (Part 1)
A/N: Wow okay, so this is a Soul Eater AU set in the Psycho-Pass universe that I wrote but never posted, and honestly I don’t know why. I really dig the idea and direction I was going with it, so let’s see how this goes. This will be a multi-chapter work.
Summary: There’s no rest for the wicked (or otherwise) when Death City is crawling with latent criminals. It’s Maka Albarn’s first day as an inspector at the Shibusen Madness Scale Law Enforcement Department, and what a first day it is.
Word Count: 2511
Genre: Psycho-Pass AU; Action, Drama
Characters/Pairings: Maka Albarn, Death the Kidd (Dean Kiddenger), Black*Star, Soul “Eater” Evans, Sid Barrett, Myra Nygus, Crona Gorgon, Giriko Sawyer, Angela (mention of Mifune and Arachne)/None in this chapter
Warnings: Violence (threats with a knife and description of death by explosion [if you’ve seen Psycho-Pass, you know what I mean, if not, I don’t go into much detail, no worries]), minor character death, hostage situation
“Oh man oh man I’m going to be late!” A petite girl wove between masses of towering (over her, anyway) pedestrians; her blonde pigtails flew behind her when she finally broke free of the hoards and took off at a sprint.  “Excuse me, pardon me, sorry-Whoa!!” Grabbing a pair of silver handles just before her face had an unfortunate encounter with spotless glass, Maka Albarn sighed with relief when big black characters declaring “Shibusen Madness Scale Law Enforcement Department” met her eyes instead. Righting herself, she threw the door open and attempted to speed through the lobby unnoticed, pulling up only when a skull-faced security droid requested her identification. "Oh, here-" She whipped out her newly commissioned PDA2400 and flashed her ID.
 "Authorization Confirmed: Albarn, Maka. Your presence is requested in building 3, level 8, hall 5, security desk 12, belonging to the Enforcement of Autonomy through Technology Division."
 "Thank-" She paused, realizing a drone likely didn't register appreciation, so she merely tightened her signature pigtails and pressed forward.
After nearly 10 whole minutes of wrong halls and desks, Maka finally strode toward number 12, trying to keep her assurance about her. 
 "Um..." Well, that went... "Is this the EAT Security desk?"
 A raven haired man with brilliant golden eyes peered over his clipboard, his eyes narrowing as he flipped through the pages. 
 "You must be the new inspector....Albarn...Maka, correct?"
 "Yes, Maka Albarn." She straightened her shoulders, declaring her name with a stable tone. 
 "Albarn, huh?..." He muttered to himself. It could be a coincidence... "Dean Kiddenger. You may address me as Inspector Kiddenger. Now if you'll follow me this way..." He gestured down the off-white hallway. Following him like a newly domesticated animal, she nearly bumped into him when he suddenly stopped in front of an automatic glass door. "This-" He withdrew an identification card from his pocket, slid it through the registration slot, and ushered her inside. "Is our headquarters, so to speak. At least, for our unit of The Enforcement of Autonomy through Technology Division. You, myself, and our subordinates will work here."
 "Our-" Before she could get the question out, he was leading her to the side of the room.
 "Your station is here." He pointed to a small desk with a flat screen computer. "Any and all assignments will be delivered to your desk or sent instantly to your personalized Shibusen messaging inbox. Assignment reports are due no later than 24 hours after the mission is completed and all Madness Scale Detection Guns are returned to their proper dock. Assignments that do not fit the proper formatting as outlined in form-" 
 "FID 1-M, Form of Inspector Duties, section one, subsection M, of the Shibusen Madness Scale Law Enforcement Division handbook."
 He paused, his stare neutral as he observed her from behind his clipboard. Her mossy eyes glimmered, though she bit her lip a bit, realizing that she might have overstepped her bounds already...
 "It's nice to find that the academy was successful in training at least one knowledgeable recruit." The faintest shadow of a smile nearly graced his lips as he continued. "Seeing as you likely know anything else I might tell you, I will save both of us the time and trouble. Now, we will proceed to-" 
 A screeching blare sounded from a black box attached to the man'a hip, prompting a frown from him and a grimace from his new charge.
 "It seems we are needed. Kiddenger, Identification Code 4242564. Speak." Putting his ear to a small speaker, the elder inspector attentively absorbed the transmission, ending with a terse, "Yes, we'll be right down." 
 "It seems, Miss-....Inspector Albarn, that our assistance is needed in pursuit of a newly detected latent criminal."
 "So soon?  I mean, not that I'm not excited to jump into the job so quickly, I just....it seems so sudden."
 "Yes, well, we are a bit short on manpower as of late. We don't normally commission new recruits so soon, but your scores and overall progress and knowledge seem to show that you are prepared. Now, follow me to the preparation quarters and we will do a brief run down before we meet the rest of the team."
 ~
 "This-" Inspector Kiddenger placed his hands around a bulky gun, a large skull imprinted on the side. His eyes glowed white as the gun authenticated him. "Is your Madness Scale Detection gun, also called the “MSD” or “Demon” guns. They’re controlled by the Spartoi system. I trust you received lessons in the academy?"
 "Yes...briefly, but I caught on quickly." 
 "Good. Now, as a reminder, the gun decides whether or not someone is a criminal to be subdued. The gun reads the Madness Scale of whomever it pointed at and will only unlock the trigger if the target is a latent criminal. The level of depravity determines the level of enforcement. Another reminder: Only Inspectors may use guns on Enforcers, not the other way around, because they are, in fact, latent criminals."
 Her mossy eyes widened a bit as Maka pondered the implication. She knew, of course, what, or who, really, Enforcers were, but she never thought she'd meet them so soon, or that she would ever need to use a gun on one of them...
 "Get your gun. The Enforcers should be here-" He was cut off as a massive shadow overtook the transparent door a few yards away. "Now."
 The door slid open, and a group of five, led by a dark-headed woman with a bandaged face who must have been their supervising inspector, slowly filtered into the room and gathered their respective gear.
 "These are the Enforcers." The lead inspector nodded to the silent woman, hardly bothering to lower his voice. "They are neither human nor animal, but some fine-line creatures that dwell in between. They are not as spotless as you or I, their Madness Scales having been thrown off balance long ago, but they have been deemed redeemable only through their abilities and knowledge, granting them whatever significant value to this system." 
 "I-I see..."
 "Oooo Kiddo brought us some fresh meat!" A raucous tone declared. Maka soon identified the owner as an azure-haired muscle-head of a man; he approached her confidently, gun in hand as he looked her over. "Hmmm not bad, Kiddo, though she's a little...'small up north,' if you-OW!" He was cut off when another enforcer, a sizable man with cornrows, delivered a healthy slap to the back of his head, making him see stars. 
 "That's enough from you, punk." He grumbled. "Show the lady some respect. She's our new handler, after all." 
 "Indeed." Kiddenger broke in, shooting a disdainful glare at the loud mouth. "For today, Black*Star," He pointed to the now sheepish brawn for Maka's reference. "And Sid." He gestured to the towering figure. "Will come with me. Soul and Crona, you're with Inspector Albarn."
 "All right, team, let's do this!!" Black Star thundered, pounding out the door as the other two men followed behind him. 
 "Well..." Maka turned, finding herself face-to-face with a set of the palest blue eyes she'd ever seen. "I'm Maka Albarn," She chirped. "And you're..." 
 "Uh...um, C-Crona G-G-Gorgon..." The robin egg irises shied from her gaze. 
 "And you-" 
 "Hey, Kidd and the others left like a full minute ago." A growling tone bit off. "We'll save intros for later, we need to get a move on." Silvery locks brushed past her, and she barely caught sight of flashing scarlet as the rough-throated figure breezed past her.
 "Right, sorry....Soul?" She jogged after him, Crona trailing behind, his gun facing the floor. "So, where are we going, exactly?"
 "Check your SPDA. You should've been sent the information as soon as we were assigned." 
 Flipping open her device, Maka found a briefing message awaiting her. Scrolling through, she picked out the general details and area of pursuit. 
 Target Name: Giriko Sawyer
Occupation: Pest Control Technician
Affiliation: Arachnaphobia Pest Control Services (Currently Under Surveillance)
Status: Targets condition detected by street scanners when he was on his lunch break. Never returned to his post. His last detection indicated that his Madness Scale Ratio was unbalanced at 30:70.
 "The target's name is... Giriko... weird... okay, scanners not too far from here just picked up his readings. Let's go!" She took off at run, adrenaline feeding her elation as she lead her team to their mission field.
 ~
 "Let's see..." Maka stood at the crossroads of two alleyways, trying to pinpoint which of her three options was their best bet. "Left leads deeper into the city...right leads toward the residential district...straight leads to the business sector...."
 "He went right." Soul interjected.
 Maka stalled. "How do you know?...That...natural instinct for sniffing out depravity?" She snuck a glance at the rather tall man poised in front of her; his face was stoic. Despite what the senior inspector had said, he looked pretty human to her...though his eyes...
 He merely nodded to the right, indicating a discarded uniform hanging from a fruit crate. "Briefing said he works at Arachnophobia Pest Control, right?" 
 Blushing a bit, Maka followed the pair as they slowly moved forward. "Soul?"
 "Yeah?" He grunted, angling toward her with a raised brow as they crept forward.
 "What did it mean, in the mission update, when it said that Arachnophobia is under surveillance?"
 "That place has churned out a handful of employees with MScale imbalances. Giriko is the third this year. Some team from Shibusen is keeping tabs on the place to see if they can pinpoint the cause."
 "I see..." She started a bit when her PDA rang out with a mission update.
 "H-he took a hostage." Crona stuttered out, his brows creased. "A k-kid...a little girl n-named Angela. What'll we do now, Soul?" 
 "What we're already doing. Track the guy down and wait for the Demon guns to tell us what to do with the scumb-" 
 A dark, lurching figure emerged from around an apartment building about a block ahead of them.  A high-pitched little voice cried out indignantly. "You better let me go! You're gonna be sorry you took me! My daddy knows how to fight, and he'll kick your stupid butt with his big sword! He'll cut your guts ou-"
 "Shaddup!" The man hollered, suddenly spinning around and pinning the child against the wall, a knife angled toward her tiny throat. "One more peep from you and I'll slice right through that windpipe of yours, ya hear?!" 
 The child's words clogged in her throat, her brown eyes wide in recognition. "M-Mister...Gir-?"
 "Hey!" Maka cried, charging forward even as Crona and Soul grasped at her to keep quiet. "Let her g-"
 "Stop right there or she dies!" Giriko demanded, pulling the child in front of him as a human shield, the knife still at her throat. 
 "Crap." Soul muttered from behind her.
 "Hey, you! Alla you! Drop your guns, now! Or she dies!" 
 Throwing a glance behind the man, Maka slowly lowered her gun, signaling for the other two to do the same. 
 Detecting her subtle movement, the criminal peered over his shoulder. "The hell you-" 
 "AAHH!" Maka, her weapon raised and activated, charged at the man full force, gun pointed to his forehead. 
 "Target's MScale Ratio: 25:75. Now activating: sin erasing exec-." 
 "No you don't!" The man released the girl long enough to spin around and kick the gun from Maka's hands, a triumphant grin on his features. "Now you're in for it, Missy!" He bellowed, grabbing the girl in one arm and the inspector in the other. Laughing hysterically, he muttered, "There ain't no way I'm spendin' my life in one of those isolation rooms. I'm takin' both of you with me, and you'll be my pretty little-"
 "-20:80. Now activating: sin erasing execution."
 A roar shattered the air, and nothing was left of the man but scattered carnage and a pool of blood. Turning, Maka sighed with relief when she saw Kiddenger lowering his gun, Black Star and Sid looking on behind him.
 Turning toward the little girl at her side, Maka started, "It's gonna be okay, swee-" She froze at the petrified look on the child's face; her tiny body trembled violently, her big brown eyes wide and watering. Bending down, Maka took the child into her embrace, rocking her as the girl murmured, "He…he w-worked w-with my d-addy...he...t-tried to k-k-" She exploded into sobs, gripping onto the woman as tears poured from her eyes. 
 "It's gonna be okay now, sweetie." Maka soothed, lifting the child into her arms as she turned to her team. "Everything's gonna be okay."
 ~
 "H-How's she doing?" Crona asked a few hours later, coming up beside Maka as she watched the child from behind a two-way mirror. 
 "I think she'll be okay, eventually. Her madness scale took a hit after all that, but she's still a kid. They bounce back pretty well."
 "I'll say...."
 "Hey."
 Soul poked his head in the door. "Kidd needs to talk to us." 
 In the conference room, Inspector Kiddenger and a spectacled lady Maka recognized as the Head Inspector, Yumi  Azusa, sat at the head of a lengthy table.
 "Inspector Albarn." Azusa began, her tone and her eyes the same cold steel. "Inspector Kiddenger has informed me that you took....unnecessary and highly dangerous risks during your recent mission." 
 "I-" 
 "You threw yourself at a latent criminal, allowed him to de-arm you and take you into his custody, correct?"
 "Well, only-" 
 "Y-Yes, M-Ma'am,” Crona cut in, blushing when all eyes were on him. “Ah-she did, but-" 
 "She believed, though incorrectly, that her actions would allow her to free the hostage, even at a personal cost to herself."
 "B-but-"
 "Inspector Albarn, I understand that you are new here, but such actions cannot be taken. The risk posed to the hostage and to yourself-"
 "But, ma'am, um...Chief Azusa,” Maka started. “We both made it out alive and safe, save for some blood stains, and my MScale was completely unaffected."
 That froze the room for a moment.
 Sighing, the other woman rose and assented, “Very well. Since you are new and your qualifications are exemplary, you will be pardoned with minor probationary action this one time. I expect a full and detailed report to be sitting on my desk by 5:30pm tomorrow, understood?"
 "Yes ma'am."
 ~
 "Wow." Soul deadpanned as the trio strode back to the observation room. "She's never gone that light on anybody. She must really be impressed with you." 
 Maka merely hummed in reply as she went in to interact with Angela.
 "She's...different, Soul." Crona commented as they watched her bright eyes and sweet smile as she spoke with the recovering child. "I...I can't believe she wasn't tainted at all...even after that guy threatened her..."
 Soul merely grunted in reply, his flashing gaze still locked on the outlandish inspector who was his newly assigned owner.
 "B-but I'm glad she's here...A n-new face isn't s-so bad..."
 "Yeah, let's just hope that we don't end up babysitting her more than she monitors us."
 The older Enforcer turned on his heel, heading for his quarters to do a little investigating of his own.
5 notes · View notes
dreamscript · 7 years
Text
Spiders
There’s a spider in the room.
You’re scared, Minhyuk’s terrified, and Hyunwoo’s tired.
“You know, I’m starting to think that the only reason you guys are friends with me is so that I can kill the spiders.”
fill for this request
3.2k words, comedy, minhyuk + reader + hyunwoo, college au
Hyunwoo is dreaming. 
He prances about in a sparkling, sunshine-filled world, with all-you-can-eat buffets prepared by top-notch chefs, expansive gyms, nicely toned arms, screaming marmot noises, comf--
Wait.
He pauses in his enjoyment of the dreamworld and listens intently to the harsh, guttural, grating sounds. Screaming marmot noises.
No, no. The noises--oh. That’s his phone.
Letting out a groan, he reaches over for the obnoxiously screaming device. He curses himself for forgetting to turn his ringer off, and then curses Minhyuk for setting his default ringtone to screaming marmots. He’d forgotten to never trust the kid with his phone.
Hyunwoo doesn’t even bother looking at the caller ID--whoever it is, whatever the hell they want, none of it matters. The only thing that really counts, he has decided, is his much-needed sleep. He’s got an 8 AM class tomorrow that he’s been dreading, but he’s gotta go because he’s already behind as is. And everyone knows that if you’re behind, you are behind. He’s still trying, though. Especially since he’s already paying thousands to attend the university, and he’d be damned if he failed one of his core classes.
“What.” His voice comes out as a deep, menacing rumble. The person’s got precisely 0.3 seconds to answer before he--
“HYUNWOO!”
He instinctively flinches. Faintly, he feels--hears?--his ears ringing. Hyunwoo doesn’t even need to think to know the person is Minhyuk, who seems more than ready to die a painful, torturous death. Tomorrow. After he goes back to sleep. And goes to class.
“The fuck you want?” he hisses into the receiver. Out of the corner of his eye, he notes that it is currently 3:17 A.M. Fucking fantastic.
“YOU HAVE TO CO--AH!” There’s static as Minhyuk yelps and loses hold of the phone, letting it slip from his grasp and fall--somewhere. Hyunwoo grunts and feels his eyelids fluttering shut, finger moving to jab satisfactorily at the red “end call” button--
“SHIT--H-Hyunwoo!” His eyes immediately widen upon hearing your voice. “Y-You gotta get here right now!” In the background, he can hear another strangled cry from Minhyuk. You curse under your breath. More static.
“What’s wrong? Where are you?” Hyunwoo immediately sits up in his bed, eyes frantically darting around the darkened room, attempting to locate his clothes, his shoes, maybe a can of pepper spray...
“Wow, okay, I see how it is!” Minhyuk’s whining, slightly panicked voice comes back. “You curse me out when I call you, but as soon as ________ takes over the phone, you immediately start paying attention!”
Okay, so Minhyuk’s got a point there. But that’s only because Hyunwoo’s so used to his panicked voice that he’s become completely desensitized, whereas with you...he doesn’t really hear you in such a state of panic very often. Only on certain occasions…Wait.
“What’s. The. Problem.” Hyunwoo grits his teeth. He swears to god that if this is yet another substance-induced incident, or a horrendous prank of sorts, he is going to fucking kill--
“We’re in Minhyuk’s room right now! And, uh,” you let out a loud squeal. “There’s--” Hyunwoo snarls in annoyance, irritated when the answer he’s been waiting so impatiently for is obfuscated by loud static.
“There’s a fucking what?”
“There’s a spider!”
Hyunwoo sighs and flops back down on his bed. Ah yes, of course. He should know this by now: of the few times he’s heard you so panicked, once (and the most recent) was a prank. All the other four times were about spiders and other related miniature-sized threats (whereas for Minhyuk, his calls tend to be a hysterical mixture of both, with great frequency).
Sometimes, he wonders why he even bothers. Seriously, it’s two against one. Against a small, measly spider. You’ve all been through so many more life threatening situations, and yet, it’s always the damned arachnid that--
“Hyunwoo? Hello?” Your voice breaks through his thoughts, now with an edge of hysteria.
--sends you two into a practical fit of hysteria. He hears you call for him again, and in the background comes Minhyuk’s famed shriek of terror. And then your loud cursing and screaming. He can already imagine the scene in his head, in which--
“HYUNWOO! HELLO? ARE YOU--SHIT GODFUCK MINHYUK IT’S COMING--”
--Minhyuk is clutching his pillow with sheer desperation, almost as if begging the cushion to vanquish the eight-legged threat in his room, while you curse and screech in fear, movements frantic and jerky as you attempt to meld into the wall, or some other surface.
Ah yes. He grins, almost sadistically. He sees it perfectly now, an entertaining display of sheer terror over a spider. A common, probably non-venomous creature, just trying to live its simple life... He’s pretty sure you two will be fine. In fact, maybe just this once he won’t cater to your needs; the both of you have to learn to survive without him, after all.
He closes his eyes and wishes for the sweet embrace of slumber...
“HYUNWOO!”
...or maybe not. Your desperate yell jerks him back, and he feels that annoying voice tugging at the back of his mind, that thing he so-calls his moral conscience.
Would he be okay leaving his friends alone in a room with their greatest fear?
Probably.
He hears more cursing and then some straight up begging. He’s pretty sure that in a few more seconds, tears would be involved as well.
Okay, so maybe not so much. Damn himself and his morals. He grunts and sits back up on his bed, now sufficiently woken up.
“HYUN--”
“Yeah, yeah, I’ll be there ASAP. Hang tight, don’t die, and if it comes down to it, sacrifice Minhyuk and make a mad dash for it when the enemy is distrac--”
“Hey! I heard that--”
Hyunwoo chuckles as he slips on his shoes, pausing for a moment to get Minhyuk’s room key from its spot next to yours. The keys had been given to him after one too many incidents--or “near death experiences,” as Minhyuk calls them--in which he’d arrived to exterminate a spider (or some other unfortunate pest), only to find the door locked and the petrified victim cowering in some far end of the room, unable to move to open the door.
“--fight me you hunky ass muscle brain--”
Hyunwoo smoothly ends the call and steps out of his room, breaking into a jog.
//
“Okay, Minhyuk, he’s coming, so until he arrives, we’ll just have to barricade ourselves and keep an eye on the threat. Minhyuk?” You look over at the slightly-dazed, still-fuming boy next to you. You elbow him and he yelps.
“Yeah?”
“Eyes on the target.”
“Right--shit, yeah.”
You turn back to fix your gaze back on the current issue at hand: the brown, miniscule, skittering dot that threatens your very existence. Minhyuk tenses beside you as it wanders aimlessly in his room, nearing the bed. The silent standoff between the both of you and the spider continues until the arachnid suddenly seems to find a direction and purpose.
It turns towards the bed.
And it leaps in that very direction with an alarmingly fast pace.
You let out a shriek--or is it Minhyuk?--as you watch it come closer and closer, almost seeing it hiss between its tiny little fangs--
Bam.
Like a super hero from a kid’s comic, Hyunwoo bursts into the room just as the spider closes the distance and very nearly gets a double kill.
With one fell swoop, he kills the spider, reaching over to pinch its body into a tissue. You exhale, letting go of the breath you’d been holding, as Hyunwoo disappears into the bathroom to flush the body down the toilet.
“Th-Thanks,” you call after him. Minhyuk makes a noise in agreement. You hear the toilet flush, the sink go off. Then silence. Hyunwoo pads out.
“You know,” he says, “I’m starting to think that the only reason you guys are friends with me is so that I can kill the spiders.”
“Oh come on,” Minhyuk protests. “We invite you to hangouts and places that are spider-free too!”
You slap his shoulder and Hyunwoo laughs.
“Anyways, before I go, what are you guys doing up this late? On a weekday?”
“Studying,” you reply. Minhyuk grumbles.
“Last-minute cramming,” you amend. Hyunwoo looks skeptical. Minhyuk looks guilty.
“Okay, fine, watching Stranger Things. Happy?”
“Quite, actually. It’s a good show,” Hyunwoo says. And then he leaves, though not without running into the door. Twice. You wince and feel vaguely bad for forcing him out here. It’s still 3 AM, after all.
//
“Happy now?” you ask over your styrofoam cup.
“Hardly,” Hyunwoo replies smoothly. “But I really wasn’t expecting much. Free coffee is still free coffee. And I’m too tired and depressed to care as much about quality.”
“So I take it you’re failing that class pretty badly?” Minhyuk asks casually. Hyunwoo makes a grim expression and nods. He then looks down at the black liquid in his own styrofoam cup. All he sees is his own tired, deadbeat reflection, though slightly distorted and at a terrible angle. He grimaces and picks it up, throwing it down his throat all the same. Maybe the caffeine will give him a heart-attack, or something, and he’ll finally feel the sweet release of death.
Ahem.
Anyways.
Joking suicidal thoughts aside, there is currently yet another cup of relatively disgusting, hot coffee being waved directly in front of his face in a dangerously haphazard manner. As much as he contemplates the void, he’d really rather not have it end now, and especially not with a cup of cheap cafeteria coffee to the face.
(On second thought, that probably wouldn’t be enough to kill him. Maybe blind him, permanently disfigure him. The point still stands, though. He refuses to lose to coffee.)
“Hyunwoo? Hello?” You continue to wave your coffee in front of his face.
“Yeah, yeah, I’m here.” Before you can accidentally spill the thing into his eyes, he gently pushes your hand away. You set the cup down on the table.
“Sorry. But yeah, thanks for helping us out a few days ago. At 3 AM. And sorry for interrupting your much-needed sleep. You’ll pull through in your class. I think.” You give him a reassuring smile that really isn’t that reassuring. He smiles back because he’s going to fail and knows that everyone knows he will.
He clears his throat, setting the now-empty cup back onto the table. “Anyways, in regards to that spider incident, I have something to tell you guys.”
“Hm?”
“I’m going to be out for the weekend, so if you guys have any incidents…”
“Oh.” You turn to look at Minhyuk. He stares back at you. Hyunwoo wonders if you guys somehow have telepathic abilities. He actually wouldn’t be very surprised at all, really. In fact, he’s actually kind of jealous. They’d be nice, especially if he’s in a pinch and needs help from a friend on a test for a certain class…
“So, uh, where are you going to be?”
“Huh? Oh, uh, funeral,” Hyunwoo replies. “But I was going to say, if you guys are worried about more spiders appearing--especially with the weather getting warmer and all--I could actually stay back.”
“Why?” Minhyuk looks both alarmed and relieved. “Wait, what? I mean, I know that we’re best friends and everything but this is a funeral--”
“For my uncle,” Hyunwoo interrupts. “Racist misogynist extraordinaire. Or so I’ve heard. Never really met him, though if what my mother tells me about him is true, I can understand why. He also had some sort of cerebral injury later in his life and let’s just say...his already pretty loose filter became very much nonexistent.”
“Ah,” you say, relaxing back into your seat. “Well in that case I don’t feel all that bad about asking you to stay.”
“Neither do I,” Hyunwoo replies. “Honestly, my family is only going to collect some old items of ours that somehow wound up in his possession.”
“Oh. Well, in that case, I think you should still go.”
“You think so?”
“Yeah,” Minhyuk says. “Go and get your stuff, man. What if someone steals what’s rightfully yours because you aren’t there?”
“I mean…”
“If you really want to stay, then stay. I mean, I still feel kind of bad for asking you to stay. Plus, I don’t think there will be that many spiders...hopefully,” you add on.
Hyunwoo studies the two of you carefully. Maybe he should go. He’d heard that there was apparently some painting there that belonged to his father, and he’d been meaning to see it.
“Um, okay then.”
//
The first day without Hyunwoo...is just like any other day, except without the reassurance, at the back of your mind, that if any sort of eight-legged threat were to appear, he would also appear to save you.
But it’s okay, because on most days you don’t need to rely on him for such things. You and Minhyuk pass it by as normal, binge-watching more shows and getting started on Black Mirror. The episode ends, fading into the usual “next episode” screen on Netflix.
You stretch, letting out a satisfied groan escape your mouth. “‘Mkinda thirsty,” you mumble. Minhyuk grunts. Turning your head about, you look around for your mug; you’re pretty sure you left it somewhere nearby…
There it is. You spot it sitting on your desk, a few feet away from where you and Minhyuk are currently squished on the bed (seriously--you should get a couch). Except...you’re quick to spot something else next to it, too.
Something small.
And tiny.
With many appendages.
“M-M-Minhyuk,” you start, slapping him on the shoulder multiple times.
“Hm?” He sounds half-asleep.
The thing twitches. And moves. Shit. “Th-There’s a s-spider.”
Almost immediately, Minhyuk tenses. He shifts on the bed. “W-Where?”
With a shaking finger, you point at the dot of brown on the other side of the room, skittering about without a clear sense of aim or direction on the desk.
He makes a terrified squeaking noise, hands desperately grabbing at you before he manages to lock you in a death embrace. You hug him back just as desperately, fearing for you damned life.
As it inches towards your direction and nears the bed closer and closer, you can’t help but think one thing:
“Maybe,” you whisper, terrified, “we should’ve told Hyunwoo to stay...”
“I-I think that’d be nice and all but...we’ll hopefully be fine without him...” Slowly, he unravels his arms.
“But he’s literally the only one who can face those--those things!”
“No. No, he’s not.”
“Wh--” It’s then that you notice that Minhyuk’s rolled up an old magazine of yours, clutching it tightly in his sweaty hand. “Wait, are you really…?”
He nods. You’re unsure about what to feel: on one hand, you’re filled with desperate hope, praying to the deities that Minhyuk will be successful in his dangerous mission and exterminates the threat--but on the other hand, the very threat is the bane of both of your existences.
With what seems to be incredible courage, Minhyuk unfolds his trembling legs, letting his feet make cold contact with the ground. You inhale sharply as he cautiously inches towards the spider, which skitters precariously towards the edge of the desk.
One step.
Minhyuk seems too big for the room, all of a sudden. With just one, fear-filled step, he’s already covered a third of the distance between him and the desk. That has the spider.
Two steps.
He’s taken two steps from the bed, the sanctuary, the haven of safety, venturing deeper into enemy territory. Bravely, he raises his glossy paper weapon.
“Minhyuk…”
Three steps.
His strides may have gotten smaller, but he’s still close, much too close. If the spider could jump--can they jump?--it would easily land on his forearm, and from there sink its tiny little (most likely) venomous fangs into the flesh, pierce his fair, perfect, flawless and pure skin, and stare up at his crumbling, dying form with all eight of its beady little eyes--
There’s a loud thwack and you suddenly jolt, eyes widening with fear as you expect to see his dead body on the ground--
“Y-You’re alive.”
Minhyuk stands panting before your desk, hand firmly pressing the magazine to the desk.
“Y-Yeah.” He says it as if he’s surprised he’s alive too.
Carefully, Minhyuk lifts up the magazine, inspecting it carefully. You can’t see the look on his face, but he makes a satisfied noise.
“I--I killed it.” He turns to look at you now, and his face is the epitome of elation. “I-I did it. I killed the spider--” Minhyuk continues to babble happily as you straighten up on the bed and beam widely at him.
“Really? Are you sure it’s dead? Rip off the page of the mag that it’s smashed on--yeah. Careful--yeah, okay, go and flush that down the toilet. I don’t care if it clogs, because I am not taking any risks--”
He jibbers excitedly as he prances out of the room.
//
“Man, so is this how Hyunwoo feels whenever he kills a spider?” Minhyuk asks dreamily. “It feels so great. No wonder he does it for us so often.”
You nod in agreement. “That explains why he was so reluctant to leave us alone.” You look at him, leaning against your now spider-free desk. “Where’d you get all that courage from, anyway?”
He shrugs and attempts to act casual and “oh-so-manly” about it. “Geh, who knows. Probably was just some fight-or-flight instinct, but I chose fight.”
“Right, okay,” you giggle. He grins at you, still perched on the bed, half-covered in sheets. He’s feeling a bit too awkward to admit it just yet, but it was also in part because there was this sudden, surging notion to protect you. And himself. And the rest of humanity, probably, from the accursed spider.
“Wow, I feel so great, like I could lift entire buildings and--”
“Minhyuk?” He starts at the slightly panicked look on your face.
“Yeah?”
“There’s another one.” With a slightly trembling hand, you point at the ground to the left of him… And holyshityou’rerightshitshitshit--
There’s a loud squeak of protest as both you and Minhyuk immediately dive for the bed. He ends up crushing half of your body with his weight and you’re left wheezing and gasping for multiple reasons.
“H-HYUNWOO!”
//
In a large, relatively crowded room filled with people swathed in black, Hyunwoo sneezes.
Reaching for his handkerchief, he wipes his nose and glances around at those around him, people who seem oblivious to his sneeze. They continue to stare at the casket with mixed expressions of sadness, sorrow, joy, and satisfaction.
Everything about the funeral is plain, utterly plain. Not a single flower is in sight. Or pepper shaker. Or cat, or dog, or any kind of fur-shedding animal, for that matter.
He shrugs and does away with the handkerchief. Maybe someone was thinking of him.
a/n: i know, i know. i pick on poor minhyuk way too much. first its the werepotato incident, and now im making him suffer with spiders.
lol this fic is so random and strangely incomplete
inspired by a whole plethora of naruto fanfiction ive been reading tbh
additionally here is a yt link to screaming marmots.
27 notes · View notes
Text
The Top 10 Health Scares Of The Decade
The Top 10 Health Scares Of The Decade - ABC News
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/Decade/top-10-health-scares-past-10-years/story?id=9249373 Bottom of Form
1.Top of Form
2.Bottom of Form
 The Top 10 Health Scares Of The Decade
The Medical Unit breaks down what kept you up nights the past 10 years.
By
JOSEPH BROWNSTEIN<br />ABC News Medical Unit
December 4, 2009, 10:44 AM
 Dec. 7, 2009— -- While the past decade has seen great strides in medical technology, it hasn't seen solutions to all of our health problems.
There were novel viruses that threatened to kill us all. There were toxins in our children's toys, and we were told to worry about the junk they were eating.
Some of these threats turned out to be almost nonexistent. Others were arguably overblown. Some caused widespread harm.
So what new threats have been robbing you of sleep since the annual odometer rolled over from 1999 to 2000? Join us as we take a look at the top ten new threats of the last ten years.
1.       Swine Flu (H1N1)
Since it came to public attention in the United States in April, the largest health scare of 2009 has been swine flu.
While other forms of the virus typically peak in February and largely affect the elderly, this strain of the H1N1 flu virus came out of season and mostly affected younger people.
In June, the World Health Organization declared the virus a pandemic, meaning that it was widespread on multiple continents.
Manufacturers began producing vaccine at the end of the spring, but there were shortages nationwide, even late into the fall.
While the majority of cases of the flu have been mild, thousands of American deaths have been attributed to the virus.
But no matter the severity, many health experts agree there are lessons to be learned.
"We just have to note, and this was a bit scary, that when H1N1 came along in communities... our capacity to take care of [patients] was stretched," said Dr. William Schaffner, Chair of the Department of Preventive Medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. "We don't have a lot of reserve in the health care system anymore."
 2.       Bisphenol A (BPA)
While much of the alarm over the chemical bisphenol A, or BPA for short, has come lately, scientists have been looking at it for years.
In January of 2000, an article in the Journal of the American Dental Association discussed how BPA -- which is used in some dental sealants -- was not found at detectible levels in the body more than a few hours after the treatments.
Since then, studies have shown the chemical to cause birth defects in lab animals, and even create some problems in humans in high doses. The chemical, used in household plastics, has also been found in babies, leading to increased scrutiny from regulatory bodies.
But while we know it is present in humans and can create problems at high levels, it remains unclear what the effect of BPA is in humans at lower doses.
"I would say that there's growing evidence that it is a significant concern, but it's not clear yet how much of a concern," said Joel Schwartz, a professor of epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health and director of the Harvard Center for Risk Analysis. "There's a lot of things that still need to be understood, but there's certainly enough things to say, 'Yes, this is something that needs to be on our radar screen.'"
 3.       Lead Paint On Toys From China
In 2007, a number of products made in China were recalled -- but perhaps the recall that drew the most attention was of children's toys containing lead paint, including some from the popular Thomas the Tank Engine line.
The problem wasn't so much one of scientific analysis as it was of enforcement.
"We do know that lead is bad for you," said Schwartz. "Kids and toys are a bad place to put that exposure together. That's a case where that's just outrageous."
The exact effects of the oversight are unknown, but it did shine a spotlight on imported goods.
"It's doing a little more to make sure this stuff doesn't keep slipping in," said Schwartz.
 4.       Trans-Fats
Concern over trans-fats -- found in such crowd-pleasing but doctor-disapproved foods as doughnuts and French fries -- came to a head in 2006, when New York City became the first city to ban trans-fats from restaurants.
"The issue became viral, and a lot of it was related to population studies that came out of Harvard University," said Keith-Thomas Ayoob, director of the nutrition clinic at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. "The problem with them is they tend to raise bad cholesterol and lower good cholesterol."
"The issue became viral, and a lot of it was related to population studies that came out of Harvard University," said Keith-Thomas Ayoob, director of the nutrition clinic at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. "The problem with them is they tend to raise bad cholesterol and lower good cholesterol."
In response to doctors' concerns, most trans-fats have been removed from food products -- but in many cases they may have been replaced by saturated fat, which can also be harmful in excess.
Ayoob said trans-fats were "an easy whipping post."
Trans-fats may have disappeared because they were easy to replace with other ingredients. And ultimately, the virtual disappearance of trans-fats may be a better testament to the power of economics in responding to consumer demand than that of regulation responding to public complaints.
"It's box office poison now, is what it is. No one really wants to list that on an ingredient list," said Ayoob. "That's one where the food industry responded much more quickly than government ever would have. It just didn't pay to keep it in there."
 5.       Bird Flu (H5N1)
This year's swine flu pandemic wasn't the first time Americans were concerned with a strain of flu named for an animal.
At the beginning of the decade, avian influenza was a concern in Southeast Asia because of the devastation it was causing in chicken populations. But concerns soon arose about its spread to humans and the possibility it would mutate into a form that could spread from person to person.
"These new influenza viruses usually are modified viruses that come from birds, and now, we know, swine," said Schaffner. "We know that influenza viruses change on an annual basis... The world's population will be or will virtually be completely susceptible."
But concerns over avian flu did have one positive effect for the flu vaccine industry, which has been maligned for its reliance on old technologies to create the vaccine each year. Because antigens for flu vaccines are grown in chicken eggs, it was hard to develop a vaccine for a virus that was deadly to birds, and so work had to be done to begin developing a means of creating antigen without using eggs.
Although the new manufacturing processes are not available yet, "It was exactly H5N1 bird flu that stimulated a number of new ways to create new vaccine," said Schaffner. "What we see now actually came forward as a consequence of all that concern with H5N1."
 6.       Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)
SARS was the first novel virus to captivate the world's attention this decade after it was identified by the World Health Organization in February 2003.
The respiratory infection was first reported in Asia and then spread to North America, South America and Europe before being contained.
Like influenza, the virus could spread through airborne particles, but it was far more deadly when it infected someone. According to the WHO, 8,096 people were infected worldwide. 774 people died. The virus receded by the end of 2003.
"SARS-like infections, I think, epitomize the emerging infectious diseases," said Schaffner. As for whether the strain could re-emerge, he said, "My crystal ball is pretty cloudy about that... Trying to anticipate whether it would come back or not would be very, very difficult."
 7.       Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
MRSA is the best-known of a number of bacteria that resist many of the antibiotics used to treat them. The emergence of MRSA and other bacteria has been blamed on a combination of heavy use of antibiotics and a lack of incentives for drug companies, leaving these bacteria, as Schaffner calls it, "a real, very vital threat"
Schaffner said the existence of these bacteria puts responsibility on both food producers and people who would use antibiotics to be more prudent. But he also said the problem could be compounded by the fact that there is currently little financial incentive for drug companies to devise new antibiotics that could fight the threat.
"Clearly, pharma sees the development of new antibiotics to help us treat these drug-resistant infections as high-risk and low-profit," said Schaffner. "I can think of no new product in any line of industry that, once it's released, the experts in that area say, 'Don't use it,' and that's the circumstance when any new antibiotic is created."
MRSA is not untreatable, but when using the stronger antibiotics for it, "You get yourself into a very restricted corner," Schaffner said. "You get patients to whom these drugs are incredibly toxic or you may need to keep patients in the hospital rather than send them home."
  8.       Hormone Replacement Therapy
At the start of the decade, millions of women were using hormone replacement therapy to relieve unpleasant symptoms of menopause. It was also used prevent osteoporosis and bone fractures, and heart disease as well.
But as early as 2000, some doctors were recommending against the treatment because of a study in the Journal of the American Medical Association suggesting that it increased the risk of breast cancer.
That alarm greatly increased in 2002 when researchers cut short the Women's Health Initiative study of the treatment, citing concerns over heart problems and strokes in women in the study who received HRT.
Some researchers supported the decision to stop the study, leading many women to stop their HRT, but others felt that it discouraged women who should continue the treatments. Meanwhile, studies have come out with contradictory findings, further confusing women who were unsure what to do. Controversy over HRT continued in 2008, when the International Menopause Society released new guidelines saying that HRT was effective for post-menopausal symptoms and should be considered by women and their physicians.
Following the release of the new guidelines, ABC News contributor Dr. Marie Savard wrote a column for this site in which she tried to clear up some of the confusion.
"There is no question that for a woman with severe hot flashes, sleep disturbance and an annoyingly dry vagina, nothing else works as well as estrogen," Savard wrote. "But the risks of breast cancer, stroke and blood clots from estrogen are hard to ignore... So once again, women are asked to balance the benefits of hormones with the risks and make the best decision for them."
   9.       Anthrax
After the collapse of the World Trade Center in 2001, five people died after inhaling anthrax bacteria sent through the mail.
But the public at large had little to fear from a tainted envelope.
"That was obviously not a major health problem but a significant problem for a small number of people who have been getting exposed," said Schwartz. "I think the primary concern was this might be being used to kill some people."
Senators Tom Daschle of South Dakota and Patrick Leahy of Vermont, among other public figures, had letters mailed to their offices containing anthrax.
No one was ever convicted of sending the letters, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation reportedly planned to charge government researcher Bruce Ivins in the case before he committed suicide in the summer of 2008.
 10.   Cell Phones
As cell phones became more popular this past decade, concerns over the radiation they emit -- and what effect they might have on human health -- have proliferated. Some have worried that their use may be linked to the development of brain tumors.
Thus far, however, most research suggests there is little to worry about.
Animal studies have shown that magnetic fields can affect melatonin levels, so while radiation only shows up in low levels, it's unclear what effect it has on humans. And a Scandinavian study released last week in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute confirmed what many have been saying about cell phone safety, showing no increase in brain cancer among cell phone users.
"Whether they do something worth worrying about, that's another question," said Schwartz. Similar questions are raised about high-voltage power lines, but Schwartz urged calm. "It seems to be an issue where it hasn't completely resolved, but I would say the evidence is that if something is going on it's not that big."
Of course, cell phones present an unquestioned safety hazard to Americans, but not for reasons related to radiation. Studies have shown that their use while driving poses a very real hazard.
"That's pretty clear -- talking on a cell phone and driving is like driving drunk," said Schwartz. "The radiation effects -- that doesn't look like that's a major public health issue. That doesn't look very compelling."
0 notes
melissawalker01 · 4 years
Text
Family Law In UT
In Utah, domestic violence means any criminal offense involving physical harm (or the threat of physical harm), or any attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit a criminal offense involving violence or physical harm, when committed by one cohabitant against another. A cohabitant can only be someone who is at least 16 years old (or is emancipated) who: • Is or was a spouse of the other party • Is or was living as if a spouse of the other party • Is related by blood or marriage to the other party • Has or had one or more children in common with the other party • Is the biological parent of the other party’s unborn child, or • Resides or has resided in the same residence as the other party However, cohabitants don’t include parents and their children, or siblings who are less than 18 years old.
youtube
Child Custody and Domestic Violence
When parents decide to get a divorce, the custody arrangement for their children can either be determined mutually by the parents or, if the parents can’t reach an agreement, by the court. When determining the future care and custody of a child the court considers the best interests of the child. Custody matters can become complicated when one parent alleges that the other has committed domestic violence in the past. In ordinary cases there is a rebuttable presumption that joint legal custody is in the best interest of the child, however, this presumption is overcome if there is domestic violence in the home or in the presence of the child. The following chart outlines how a family law court designs parenting plans in Utah when domestic violence has been committed within the family. During marriage, couples acquire the rights to some of the property and assets, as well as debts, acquired by one or both of them. Marital property doesn’t include things that are considered “separate property” owned by either spouse, for example, property owned before marriage, inheritance, gifts, property specifically excluded by valid prenuptial agreements, and property gained after legally separating. In addition, keep in mind that you are also on the hook still for your separate debts from before marriage.
youtube
There are two ways states divide marital property: • equitable distribution and • Community property. Utah is an equitable distribution or common law state, which is the majority marital property legal system. However, large numbers of people, especially in the Western U.S., live in community property states. This means marital property in Utah isn’t automatically assumed to be owned by both spouses and therefore should be divided equally in a divorce. In Utah, marital property is divided “equitably” or fairly, which may not be an even 50-50. Usually for longer marriages, it is about 50% to each party. For short-term marriages, the court generally puts people back to their position before the marriage, such as giving people what they had before the marriage and typically what they made during the marriage. Parties can agree on how they want to divide the property outside of court, but a judge will review it to ensure it’s fair.
Community Property: Utah is an equitable distribution state that doesn’t have community property laws. However, Utah has enacted the Uniform Disposition of Community Property Rights at Death Act (UDCPRDA). The UCDPRDA allows a person who lived in a state with community property for its marital property laws (such as Nevada and Idaho) and then moved to a state without community property (namely, Utah) to not lose any pre-existing property rights.
youtube
Utah Marriage Age Requirements Laws
Each state regulates marriage. Adult couples can decide whether or when to marry, including gay and lesbian couples where same-sex marriage has been legalized, which includes Utah since October 2014. However, if under the legal age of adulthood in a state, parents, guardians, or the court, in some situations, must provide permission for a child to marry. Even then, there’s usually a minimum age to prevent very young children from marrying. Some states, including Utah, require premarital counselling. Utah encourages the use of premarital counselling by persons seeking to marry who are under 19 years old or who’ve been previously divorced. Depending on which county in Utah you live in, premarital counselling may be a prerequisite for getting a marriage license. Minimum Legal Age without Parental Consent of both men and women who are at least 18 years old can legally marry in Utah without the permission of anyone else, including parents or religious leaders.
Minimum Legal Age with Parental Consent of Teenage boys and girls who are at least 16 years old, but are not yet 18 years old can get married in Utah with the consent of their parents or guardians.
Who must consent depends on the youth’s circumstances: • If the child’s parents are married, either parent can sign consent to the marriage • If the parents are divorced and only one parent has legal custody, then he or she must consent to the marriage • If the parents are divorced and both have joint custody, then the parent with physical custody the majority of the time must consent • If the child lives with a guardian rather than parents, the guardian must provide proof of guardianship and sign consent to the marriage
youtube
Minimum Age for First Cousin Marriage Utah permits first cousins to marry as long as both parties are at least 65 years old, or both parties are at least 55 years old and the local district court has determined that either party is unable to reproduce. In order to get legally married in Utah a couple must have a valid marriage license and have the marriage solemnized. Marriage licenses in Utah are issued by the county clerk where you intend to get married. In order to apply for a marriage license, both parties must be present and provide the following information and documentation to the clerk: • Full name, address, and date and place of birth of both parties • Both parties’ social security cards (unless a party doesn’t have a social security number) • The names and birth places of both parties’ parents (including their mothers’ maiden name) • A valid picture ID for both parties (such as a passport, birth certificate, drivers license, or state ID card), and • A license fee (most counties charge a fee) Family law courts in Utah determine how much child support a non-custodial parent (a parent who doesn’t live with their minor child) is required to pay by using the state’s child support guidelines. These guidelines take into consideration both parents’ gross incomes and the number of children that they have together. The court will follow the child support guidelines unless there is substantial evidence to rebut the guidelines. In order to determine whether or not to deviate from the guidelines the court will consider: • The standard of living of the parents • The relative wealth and income of the parents • The ability of the non-custodial parent to earn • The ability of the custodial parent to earn • The ability of an incapacitated adult child to earn, or other benefits received by an adult child • The needs of the custodial parent, the non-custodial parent, and the child • The ages of the parties, and • The responsibilities of the custodial parent and the non-custodial parent for the support of others Gross income includes perspective income from any source. For example: salaries, wages, commissions, royalties, bonuses, rents, gifts, prizes, dividends, severance pay, interest, alimony from a previous marriage, Social Security benefits, etc. Gross income doesn’t include means-tested welfare benefits that a parent receives. Adjusted gross income is calculated by subtracting alimony previously ordered and paid and child support previously ordered from the parent’s gross income. Each parent’s child support obligation is established in proportion to their adjusted gross incomes by following these steps: • Step 1: Combine the adjusted gross incomes of the parents • Step 2: Look up the base combined child support obligation using this chart • Step 3: Take the appropriate figure from the chart and multiply it by each parent’s percentage of the combined adjusted gross income The court won’t follow the child support guidelines above if: The parents have joint physical custody or split custody, or the non-custodial parent’s adjusted gross income is $1,050 or less per month Imputed Income In Utah, if a parent is unemployed or underemployed the court may impute an income on the parent in order to perform the child support calculations in the chart above. Imputed income is based on employment potential and probable earnings. This figure is calculated from employment opportunities, work history, occupation qualifications, and prevailing earnings for people of similar backgrounds in the community. If a parent doesn’t have recent work history, or if their occupation is unknown, then the court can impute income on the parent at the federal minimum wage for a 40-hour workweek. However, income can’t be imputed if any of the following conditions exist (and aren’t temporary in nature):
youtube
• The reasonable costs of child care for the parents’ minor children equals the amount of income that the custodial parent can earn • A parent is physically or mentally unable to earn the minimum wage, or • The unusual emotional or physical needs of a child requires the custodial parent to stay home and care for them
Utah Child Abuse Laws
Criminal statutes are in place to keep people safe. Utah’s child abuse laws are designed to protect children from harm by prohibiting the physical, emotional, and sexual abuse of children. These child abuse statutes assist in prosecuting child abusers and mandate certain third parties and professionals with access to children to report knowledge or suspicion of child abuse to the authorities. Utah’s Department of Child and Family Services also provides resources state-wide to protect the welfare of children.
Utah Child Custody Laws
When a couple with children breaks up, the responsibility to care for the children must be shared by both parents. An important aspect is child custody or with whom the child will live with and what visitation with the other parent will be like. Another part of this responsibility is financial support, in the form of child support. Utah family courts, like those in most states, determine child custody matters using the “best interests of the child.” The factors considered by the judge include: • Past conduct and demonstrated moral standards of the parties • Parent most likely to act in the best interest of the child, including allowing child frequent contact with non-custodial parent • Bonding between each parent and the child • If a parent has intentionally exposed the child to pornography or other harmful sexual-related materials • Physical, psychological, and emotional needs of the child • Both parent’s ability to reach shared decisions for the child and prioritize the child’s welfare • If both parents participated in raising the child before the divorce • The geographic proximity of the parents’ homes • The child’s preferences • Parents ability to protect child from their conflict • Past and present ability to cooperate with each other in parenting and making decisions • Any history of child abuse, domestic violence, or kidnapping • Any other relevant factors When parents can’t develop their own parenting schedule, the court can establish an appropriate schedule more or less than the statutory minimum parent-time based on the following best interest of the child factors: • How parent-time would negative impact child’s physical health and emotional development • Distance between child’s home and the non-custodial parent’s home • Allegations of child abuse • Lack of demonstrated parenting skills when there’s no safeguards to ensure child’s safety • Financial inability of non-custodial parent to provide food and shelter during parent-time • Child’s preference, if sufficiently mature • Parent’s incarceration • Shared interests of the child and non-custodial parent • Non-custodial parent’s involvement in the child’s school, community, religious, or other related activities • Non-custodial parent’s availability to care for the child when the custodial parent is working or has other obligations • Chronic pattern of missing, cancelling or denying regularly scheduled parenting time • Parent-time schedule of siblings • Lack of reasonable alternatives for nursing child • Any other criteria the court feels is relevant to the best interests of the child
How Can a Family Law Attorney Help Represent Your Case?
Divorce and all legal issues associated with this pivotal life event can be resolved through negotiation, mediation and dynamic representation in trial. Legal elements connected to divorce include custody, visitation and asset and property division. Family Attorney can help you with a number of issues related to family law including, but not limited to: • Asset and property division is a fair and just distribution of marital property and debts. • Child Custody includes disputed cases. In sole physical custody the most able parent, best equipped to provide a safe, stable and healthy environment is selected. Visitation can be a part of this to help the noncustodial parent continue a relationship with the child. • Shared custody means that both parents demonstrate the ability to cooperate and communicate in sharing responsibility for a child. • Visitation involves the creation of comprehensive parenting plans suited to individual family circumstances. They protect your children’s well-being and your vital relationship with them. • Child support Utah courts recommend that you consult an attorney about child support. This is because calculating child support can be very complicated. It’s possible to limit your consultation to this or other aspects of your case. • Protection orders are often necessitated when domestic violence is threatened. They may also be requested by a party seeking to gain an advantage in a custody dispute. • Adoption and guardianship are alternatives that enable other responsible caregivers such as stepparents and grandparents the legal right to make important decisions regarding the welfare and protection of children. • Paternity actions can be made on behalf of either a mother or father who chooses to take responsibility and seeks to claim custody or visitation rights. • Prenuptual and Postnuptual Agreements can not only help protect assets, but it can also help clarify any debt issues. We live in a time when divorce is more common, it is always wise to be informed. • Mediation is required by Utah Law for Divorcing Spouses • Divorce Modification is the legal process of amending a divorce order issued by a court. • Virtual Visitation is a broad phrase that refers to any use of technology that a parent uses to keep in contact with his or her child. • Parental Kidnapping or parental abduction is defined as the concealment, taking, or retention of a child by his parent in violation of the rights of the child’s other parent or another family member. • Grandparent’s Rights – Grandparents are heavily involved in child rearing in many families, sometimes as the primary caretakers. Under Utah divorce law, individuals that wish to end their marriage can do so on either fault or no-fault grounds. No-fault based divorces are the most common in Utah and are normally much faster and less expensive than proving a fault based divorce. The requirements for a no-fault divorce in Utah are particularly stringent when compared to other states and can be found here at Title 30 Chapter 3 Section 1 of the Utah Code. A no fault divorce is found under Utah Code 30-3-1(3)(h) where it states: “irreconcilable differences of the marriage.” This essentially means that the marriage did not work out and neither spouse is placing blame on the other or saying that one person did something to cause the divorce. While proving irreconcilable differences may be enough to receive a no-fault divorce award, the divorcing couples can also receive a no-fault divorce if they have lived separate and apart for at least three years, while other states typically require between 3-18 months of living separate and apart. This is found in Utah Code 30-3-1(3) (j): “ when the husband and wife have lived separately under a decree of separate maintenance of any state for three consecutive years without cohabitation.” If a no-fault divorce is not possible, a fault divorce can be granted one of the following grounds are proven with evidence and testimony before a Utah divorce judge: Grounds for divorce: • Impotency of the respondent at the time of marriage; • Adultery committed by the respondent subsequent to marriage; • Wilful desertion of the petitioner by the respondent for more than one year; • wilful neglect of the respondent to provide for the petitioner the common necessaries of life; • habitual drunkenness of the respondent; • conviction of the respondent for a felony; • cruel treatment of the petitioner by the respondent to the extent of causing bodily injury or great mental distress to the petitioner; • irreconcilable differences of the marriage; • incurable insanity; or • when the husband and wife have lived separately under a decree of separate maintenance of any state for three consecutive years without cohabitation.
Family Law Attorney Free Consultation
When you need legal help with family law in Utah, please call Ascent Law for your free consultation (801) 676-5506. We want to help you. We can help you with:
Family Law
Divorce
Child Custody
Guardianship
Adoption
Child Support
Alimony
And More.
Ascent Law LLC 8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite C West Jordan, Utah 84088 United States Telephone: (801) 676-5506
Ascent Law LLC
4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews
Recent Posts
How Do I Look Up My USDOT Number?
Search And Seizure Issues And The Fourth Amendment
Discharging Student Loans In Bankruptcy
I Got A New Job, Can I Still File Bankruptcy?
SEC Charges Executives With Stealing
Utah Injury Lawyer
from Michael Anderson https://www.ascentlawfirm.com/family-law-in-ut/ from Divorce Lawyer Nelson Farms Utah https://divorcelawyernelsonfarmsutah.tumblr.com/post/619902449730387968
0 notes
asafeatherwould · 4 years
Text
Family Law In UT
In Utah, domestic violence means any criminal offense involving physical harm (or the threat of physical harm), or any attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit a criminal offense involving violence or physical harm, when committed by one cohabitant against another. A cohabitant can only be someone who is at least 16 years old (or is emancipated) who: • Is or was a spouse of the other party • Is or was living as if a spouse of the other party • Is related by blood or marriage to the other party • Has or had one or more children in common with the other party • Is the biological parent of the other party’s unborn child, or • Resides or has resided in the same residence as the other party However, cohabitants don’t include parents and their children, or siblings who are less than 18 years old.
youtube
Child Custody and Domestic Violence
When parents decide to get a divorce, the custody arrangement for their children can either be determined mutually by the parents or, if the parents can’t reach an agreement, by the court. When determining the future care and custody of a child the court considers the best interests of the child. Custody matters can become complicated when one parent alleges that the other has committed domestic violence in the past. In ordinary cases there is a rebuttable presumption that joint legal custody is in the best interest of the child, however, this presumption is overcome if there is domestic violence in the home or in the presence of the child. The following chart outlines how a family law court designs parenting plans in Utah when domestic violence has been committed within the family. During marriage, couples acquire the rights to some of the property and assets, as well as debts, acquired by one or both of them. Marital property doesn’t include things that are considered “separate property” owned by either spouse, for example, property owned before marriage, inheritance, gifts, property specifically excluded by valid prenuptial agreements, and property gained after legally separating. In addition, keep in mind that you are also on the hook still for your separate debts from before marriage.
youtube
There are two ways states divide marital property: • equitable distribution and • Community property. Utah is an equitable distribution or common law state, which is the majority marital property legal system. However, large numbers of people, especially in the Western U.S., live in community property states. This means marital property in Utah isn’t automatically assumed to be owned by both spouses and therefore should be divided equally in a divorce. In Utah, marital property is divided “equitably” or fairly, which may not be an even 50-50. Usually for longer marriages, it is about 50% to each party. For short-term marriages, the court generally puts people back to their position before the marriage, such as giving people what they had before the marriage and typically what they made during the marriage. Parties can agree on how they want to divide the property outside of court, but a judge will review it to ensure it’s fair.
Community Property: Utah is an equitable distribution state that doesn’t have community property laws. However, Utah has enacted the Uniform Disposition of Community Property Rights at Death Act (UDCPRDA). The UCDPRDA allows a person who lived in a state with community property for its marital property laws (such as Nevada and Idaho) and then moved to a state without community property (namely, Utah) to not lose any pre-existing property rights.
youtube
Utah Marriage Age Requirements Laws
Each state regulates marriage. Adult couples can decide whether or when to marry, including gay and lesbian couples where same-sex marriage has been legalized, which includes Utah since October 2014. However, if under the legal age of adulthood in a state, parents, guardians, or the court, in some situations, must provide permission for a child to marry. Even then, there’s usually a minimum age to prevent very young children from marrying. Some states, including Utah, require premarital counselling. Utah encourages the use of premarital counselling by persons seeking to marry who are under 19 years old or who’ve been previously divorced. Depending on which county in Utah you live in, premarital counselling may be a prerequisite for getting a marriage license. Minimum Legal Age without Parental Consent of both men and women who are at least 18 years old can legally marry in Utah without the permission of anyone else, including parents or religious leaders.
Minimum Legal Age with Parental Consent of Teenage boys and girls who are at least 16 years old, but are not yet 18 years old can get married in Utah with the consent of their parents or guardians.
Who must consent depends on the youth’s circumstances: • If the child’s parents are married, either parent can sign consent to the marriage • If the parents are divorced and only one parent has legal custody, then he or she must consent to the marriage • If the parents are divorced and both have joint custody, then the parent with physical custody the majority of the time must consent • If the child lives with a guardian rather than parents, the guardian must provide proof of guardianship and sign consent to the marriage
youtube
Minimum Age for First Cousin Marriage Utah permits first cousins to marry as long as both parties are at least 65 years old, or both parties are at least 55 years old and the local district court has determined that either party is unable to reproduce. In order to get legally married in Utah a couple must have a valid marriage license and have the marriage solemnized. Marriage licenses in Utah are issued by the county clerk where you intend to get married. In order to apply for a marriage license, both parties must be present and provide the following information and documentation to the clerk: • Full name, address, and date and place of birth of both parties • Both parties’ social security cards (unless a party doesn’t have a social security number) • The names and birth places of both parties’ parents (including their mothers’ maiden name) • A valid picture ID for both parties (such as a passport, birth certificate, drivers license, or state ID card), and • A license fee (most counties charge a fee) Family law courts in Utah determine how much child support a non-custodial parent (a parent who doesn’t live with their minor child) is required to pay by using the state’s child support guidelines. These guidelines take into consideration both parents’ gross incomes and the number of children that they have together. The court will follow the child support guidelines unless there is substantial evidence to rebut the guidelines. In order to determine whether or not to deviate from the guidelines the court will consider: • The standard of living of the parents • The relative wealth and income of the parents • The ability of the non-custodial parent to earn • The ability of the custodial parent to earn • The ability of an incapacitated adult child to earn, or other benefits received by an adult child • The needs of the custodial parent, the non-custodial parent, and the child • The ages of the parties, and • The responsibilities of the custodial parent and the non-custodial parent for the support of others Gross income includes perspective income from any source. For example: salaries, wages, commissions, royalties, bonuses, rents, gifts, prizes, dividends, severance pay, interest, alimony from a previous marriage, Social Security benefits, etc. Gross income doesn’t include means-tested welfare benefits that a parent receives. Adjusted gross income is calculated by subtracting alimony previously ordered and paid and child support previously ordered from the parent’s gross income. Each parent’s child support obligation is established in proportion to their adjusted gross incomes by following these steps: • Step 1: Combine the adjusted gross incomes of the parents • Step 2: Look up the base combined child support obligation using this chart • Step 3: Take the appropriate figure from the chart and multiply it by each parent’s percentage of the combined adjusted gross income The court won’t follow the child support guidelines above if: The parents have joint physical custody or split custody, or the non-custodial parent’s adjusted gross income is $1,050 or less per month Imputed Income In Utah, if a parent is unemployed or underemployed the court may impute an income on the parent in order to perform the child support calculations in the chart above. Imputed income is based on employment potential and probable earnings. This figure is calculated from employment opportunities, work history, occupation qualifications, and prevailing earnings for people of similar backgrounds in the community. If a parent doesn’t have recent work history, or if their occupation is unknown, then the court can impute income on the parent at the federal minimum wage for a 40-hour workweek. However, income can’t be imputed if any of the following conditions exist (and aren’t temporary in nature):
youtube
• The reasonable costs of child care for the parents’ minor children equals the amount of income that the custodial parent can earn • A parent is physically or mentally unable to earn the minimum wage, or • The unusual emotional or physical needs of a child requires the custodial parent to stay home and care for them
Utah Child Abuse Laws
Criminal statutes are in place to keep people safe. Utah’s child abuse laws are designed to protect children from harm by prohibiting the physical, emotional, and sexual abuse of children. These child abuse statutes assist in prosecuting child abusers and mandate certain third parties and professionals with access to children to report knowledge or suspicion of child abuse to the authorities. Utah’s Department of Child and Family Services also provides resources state-wide to protect the welfare of children.
Utah Child Custody Laws
When a couple with children breaks up, the responsibility to care for the children must be shared by both parents. An important aspect is child custody or with whom the child will live with and what visitation with the other parent will be like. Another part of this responsibility is financial support, in the form of child support. Utah family courts, like those in most states, determine child custody matters using the “best interests of the child.” The factors considered by the judge include: • Past conduct and demonstrated moral standards of the parties • Parent most likely to act in the best interest of the child, including allowing child frequent contact with non-custodial parent • Bonding between each parent and the child • If a parent has intentionally exposed the child to pornography or other harmful sexual-related materials • Physical, psychological, and emotional needs of the child • Both parent’s ability to reach shared decisions for the child and prioritize the child’s welfare • If both parents participated in raising the child before the divorce • The geographic proximity of the parents’ homes • The child’s preferences • Parents ability to protect child from their conflict • Past and present ability to cooperate with each other in parenting and making decisions • Any history of child abuse, domestic violence, or kidnapping • Any other relevant factors When parents can’t develop their own parenting schedule, the court can establish an appropriate schedule more or less than the statutory minimum parent-time based on the following best interest of the child factors: • How parent-time would negative impact child’s physical health and emotional development • Distance between child’s home and the non-custodial parent’s home • Allegations of child abuse • Lack of demonstrated parenting skills when there’s no safeguards to ensure child’s safety • Financial inability of non-custodial parent to provide food and shelter during parent-time • Child’s preference, if sufficiently mature • Parent’s incarceration • Shared interests of the child and non-custodial parent • Non-custodial parent’s involvement in the child’s school, community, religious, or other related activities • Non-custodial parent’s availability to care for the child when the custodial parent is working or has other obligations • Chronic pattern of missing, cancelling or denying regularly scheduled parenting time • Parent-time schedule of siblings • Lack of reasonable alternatives for nursing child • Any other criteria the court feels is relevant to the best interests of the child
How Can a Family Law Attorney Help Represent Your Case?
Divorce and all legal issues associated with this pivotal life event can be resolved through negotiation, mediation and dynamic representation in trial. Legal elements connected to divorce include custody, visitation and asset and property division. Family Attorney can help you with a number of issues related to family law including, but not limited to: • Asset and property division is a fair and just distribution of marital property and debts. • Child Custody includes disputed cases. In sole physical custody the most able parent, best equipped to provide a safe, stable and healthy environment is selected. Visitation can be a part of this to help the noncustodial parent continue a relationship with the child. • Shared custody means that both parents demonstrate the ability to cooperate and communicate in sharing responsibility for a child. • Visitation involves the creation of comprehensive parenting plans suited to individual family circumstances. They protect your children’s well-being and your vital relationship with them. • Child support Utah courts recommend that you consult an attorney about child support. This is because calculating child support can be very complicated. It’s possible to limit your consultation to this or other aspects of your case. • Protection orders are often necessitated when domestic violence is threatened. They may also be requested by a party seeking to gain an advantage in a custody dispute. • Adoption and guardianship are alternatives that enable other responsible caregivers such as stepparents and grandparents the legal right to make important decisions regarding the welfare and protection of children. • Paternity actions can be made on behalf of either a mother or father who chooses to take responsibility and seeks to claim custody or visitation rights. • Prenuptual and Postnuptual Agreements can not only help protect assets, but it can also help clarify any debt issues. We live in a time when divorce is more common, it is always wise to be informed. • Mediation is required by Utah Law for Divorcing Spouses • Divorce Modification is the legal process of amending a divorce order issued by a court. • Virtual Visitation is a broad phrase that refers to any use of technology that a parent uses to keep in contact with his or her child. • Parental Kidnapping or parental abduction is defined as the concealment, taking, or retention of a child by his parent in violation of the rights of the child’s other parent or another family member. • Grandparent’s Rights – Grandparents are heavily involved in child rearing in many families, sometimes as the primary caretakers. Under Utah divorce law, individuals that wish to end their marriage can do so on either fault or no-fault grounds. No-fault based divorces are the most common in Utah and are normally much faster and less expensive than proving a fault based divorce. The requirements for a no-fault divorce in Utah are particularly stringent when compared to other states and can be found here at Title 30 Chapter 3 Section 1 of the Utah Code. A no fault divorce is found under Utah Code 30-3-1(3)(h) where it states: “irreconcilable differences of the marriage.” This essentially means that the marriage did not work out and neither spouse is placing blame on the other or saying that one person did something to cause the divorce. While proving irreconcilable differences may be enough to receive a no-fault divorce award, the divorcing couples can also receive a no-fault divorce if they have lived separate and apart for at least three years, while other states typically require between 3-18 months of living separate and apart. This is found in Utah Code 30-3-1(3) (j): “ when the husband and wife have lived separately under a decree of separate maintenance of any state for three consecutive years without cohabitation.” If a no-fault divorce is not possible, a fault divorce can be granted one of the following grounds are proven with evidence and testimony before a Utah divorce judge: Grounds for divorce: • Impotency of the respondent at the time of marriage; • Adultery committed by the respondent subsequent to marriage; • Wilful desertion of the petitioner by the respondent for more than one year; • wilful neglect of the respondent to provide for the petitioner the common necessaries of life; • habitual drunkenness of the respondent; • conviction of the respondent for a felony; • cruel treatment of the petitioner by the respondent to the extent of causing bodily injury or great mental distress to the petitioner; • irreconcilable differences of the marriage; • incurable insanity; or • when the husband and wife have lived separately under a decree of separate maintenance of any state for three consecutive years without cohabitation.
Family Law Attorney Free Consultation
When you need legal help with family law in Utah, please call Ascent Law for your free consultation (801) 676-5506. We want to help you. We can help you with:
Family Law
Divorce
Child Custody
Guardianship
Adoption
Child Support
Alimony
And More.
Ascent Law LLC 8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite C West Jordan, Utah 84088 United States Telephone: (801) 676-5506
Ascent Law LLC
4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews
Recent Posts
How Do I Look Up My USDOT Number?
Search And Seizure Issues And The Fourth Amendment
Discharging Student Loans In Bankruptcy
I Got A New Job, Can I Still File Bankruptcy?
SEC Charges Executives With Stealing
Utah Injury Lawyer
Source: https://www.ascentlawfirm.com/family-law-in-ut/
0 notes
michaeljames1221 · 4 years
Text
Family Law In UT
In Utah, domestic violence means any criminal offense involving physical harm (or the threat of physical harm), or any attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit a criminal offense involving violence or physical harm, when committed by one cohabitant against another. A cohabitant can only be someone who is at least 16 years old (or is emancipated) who: • Is or was a spouse of the other party • Is or was living as if a spouse of the other party • Is related by blood or marriage to the other party • Has or had one or more children in common with the other party • Is the biological parent of the other party’s unborn child, or • Resides or has resided in the same residence as the other party However, cohabitants don’t include parents and their children, or siblings who are less than 18 years old.
youtube
Child Custody and Domestic Violence
When parents decide to get a divorce, the custody arrangement for their children can either be determined mutually by the parents or, if the parents can’t reach an agreement, by the court. When determining the future care and custody of a child the court considers the best interests of the child. Custody matters can become complicated when one parent alleges that the other has committed domestic violence in the past. In ordinary cases there is a rebuttable presumption that joint legal custody is in the best interest of the child, however, this presumption is overcome if there is domestic violence in the home or in the presence of the child. The following chart outlines how a family law court designs parenting plans in Utah when domestic violence has been committed within the family. During marriage, couples acquire the rights to some of the property and assets, as well as debts, acquired by one or both of them. Marital property doesn’t include things that are considered “separate property” owned by either spouse, for example, property owned before marriage, inheritance, gifts, property specifically excluded by valid prenuptial agreements, and property gained after legally separating. In addition, keep in mind that you are also on the hook still for your separate debts from before marriage.
youtube
There are two ways states divide marital property: • equitable distribution and • Community property. Utah is an equitable distribution or common law state, which is the majority marital property legal system. However, large numbers of people, especially in the Western U.S., live in community property states. This means marital property in Utah isn’t automatically assumed to be owned by both spouses and therefore should be divided equally in a divorce. In Utah, marital property is divided “equitably” or fairly, which may not be an even 50-50. Usually for longer marriages, it is about 50% to each party. For short-term marriages, the court generally puts people back to their position before the marriage, such as giving people what they had before the marriage and typically what they made during the marriage. Parties can agree on how they want to divide the property outside of court, but a judge will review it to ensure it’s fair.
Community Property: Utah is an equitable distribution state that doesn’t have community property laws. However, Utah has enacted the Uniform Disposition of Community Property Rights at Death Act (UDCPRDA). The UCDPRDA allows a person who lived in a state with community property for its marital property laws (such as Nevada and Idaho) and then moved to a state without community property (namely, Utah) to not lose any pre-existing property rights.
youtube
Utah Marriage Age Requirements Laws
Each state regulates marriage. Adult couples can decide whether or when to marry, including gay and lesbian couples where same-sex marriage has been legalized, which includes Utah since October 2014. However, if under the legal age of adulthood in a state, parents, guardians, or the court, in some situations, must provide permission for a child to marry. Even then, there’s usually a minimum age to prevent very young children from marrying. Some states, including Utah, require premarital counselling. Utah encourages the use of premarital counselling by persons seeking to marry who are under 19 years old or who’ve been previously divorced. Depending on which county in Utah you live in, premarital counselling may be a prerequisite for getting a marriage license. Minimum Legal Age without Parental Consent of both men and women who are at least 18 years old can legally marry in Utah without the permission of anyone else, including parents or religious leaders.
Minimum Legal Age with Parental Consent of Teenage boys and girls who are at least 16 years old, but are not yet 18 years old can get married in Utah with the consent of their parents or guardians.
Who must consent depends on the youth’s circumstances: • If the child’s parents are married, either parent can sign consent to the marriage • If the parents are divorced and only one parent has legal custody, then he or she must consent to the marriage • If the parents are divorced and both have joint custody, then the parent with physical custody the majority of the time must consent • If the child lives with a guardian rather than parents, the guardian must provide proof of guardianship and sign consent to the marriage
youtube
Minimum Age for First Cousin Marriage Utah permits first cousins to marry as long as both parties are at least 65 years old, or both parties are at least 55 years old and the local district court has determined that either party is unable to reproduce. In order to get legally married in Utah a couple must have a valid marriage license and have the marriage solemnized. Marriage licenses in Utah are issued by the county clerk where you intend to get married. In order to apply for a marriage license, both parties must be present and provide the following information and documentation to the clerk: • Full name, address, and date and place of birth of both parties • Both parties’ social security cards (unless a party doesn’t have a social security number) • The names and birth places of both parties’ parents (including their mothers’ maiden name) • A valid picture ID for both parties (such as a passport, birth certificate, drivers license, or state ID card), and • A license fee (most counties charge a fee) Family law courts in Utah determine how much child support a non-custodial parent (a parent who doesn’t live with their minor child) is required to pay by using the state’s child support guidelines. These guidelines take into consideration both parents’ gross incomes and the number of children that they have together. The court will follow the child support guidelines unless there is substantial evidence to rebut the guidelines. In order to determine whether or not to deviate from the guidelines the court will consider: • The standard of living of the parents • The relative wealth and income of the parents • The ability of the non-custodial parent to earn • The ability of the custodial parent to earn • The ability of an incapacitated adult child to earn, or other benefits received by an adult child • The needs of the custodial parent, the non-custodial parent, and the child • The ages of the parties, and • The responsibilities of the custodial parent and the non-custodial parent for the support of others Gross income includes perspective income from any source. For example: salaries, wages, commissions, royalties, bonuses, rents, gifts, prizes, dividends, severance pay, interest, alimony from a previous marriage, Social Security benefits, etc. Gross income doesn’t include means-tested welfare benefits that a parent receives. Adjusted gross income is calculated by subtracting alimony previously ordered and paid and child support previously ordered from the parent’s gross income. Each parent’s child support obligation is established in proportion to their adjusted gross incomes by following these steps: • Step 1: Combine the adjusted gross incomes of the parents • Step 2: Look up the base combined child support obligation using this chart • Step 3: Take the appropriate figure from the chart and multiply it by each parent’s percentage of the combined adjusted gross income The court won’t follow the child support guidelines above if: The parents have joint physical custody or split custody, or the non-custodial parent’s adjusted gross income is $1,050 or less per month Imputed Income In Utah, if a parent is unemployed or underemployed the court may impute an income on the parent in order to perform the child support calculations in the chart above. Imputed income is based on employment potential and probable earnings. This figure is calculated from employment opportunities, work history, occupation qualifications, and prevailing earnings for people of similar backgrounds in the community. If a parent doesn’t have recent work history, or if their occupation is unknown, then the court can impute income on the parent at the federal minimum wage for a 40-hour workweek. However, income can’t be imputed if any of the following conditions exist (and aren’t temporary in nature):
youtube
• The reasonable costs of child care for the parents’ minor children equals the amount of income that the custodial parent can earn • A parent is physically or mentally unable to earn the minimum wage, or • The unusual emotional or physical needs of a child requires the custodial parent to stay home and care for them
Utah Child Abuse Laws
Criminal statutes are in place to keep people safe. Utah’s child abuse laws are designed to protect children from harm by prohibiting the physical, emotional, and sexual abuse of children. These child abuse statutes assist in prosecuting child abusers and mandate certain third parties and professionals with access to children to report knowledge or suspicion of child abuse to the authorities. Utah’s Department of Child and Family Services also provides resources state-wide to protect the welfare of children.
Utah Child Custody Laws
When a couple with children breaks up, the responsibility to care for the children must be shared by both parents. An important aspect is child custody or with whom the child will live with and what visitation with the other parent will be like. Another part of this responsibility is financial support, in the form of child support. Utah family courts, like those in most states, determine child custody matters using the “best interests of the child.” The factors considered by the judge include: • Past conduct and demonstrated moral standards of the parties • Parent most likely to act in the best interest of the child, including allowing child frequent contact with non-custodial parent • Bonding between each parent and the child • If a parent has intentionally exposed the child to pornography or other harmful sexual-related materials • Physical, psychological, and emotional needs of the child • Both parent’s ability to reach shared decisions for the child and prioritize the child’s welfare • If both parents participated in raising the child before the divorce • The geographic proximity of the parents’ homes • The child’s preferences • Parents ability to protect child from their conflict • Past and present ability to cooperate with each other in parenting and making decisions • Any history of child abuse, domestic violence, or kidnapping • Any other relevant factors When parents can’t develop their own parenting schedule, the court can establish an appropriate schedule more or less than the statutory minimum parent-time based on the following best interest of the child factors: • How parent-time would negative impact child’s physical health and emotional development • Distance between child’s home and the non-custodial parent’s home • Allegations of child abuse • Lack of demonstrated parenting skills when there’s no safeguards to ensure child’s safety • Financial inability of non-custodial parent to provide food and shelter during parent-time • Child’s preference, if sufficiently mature • Parent’s incarceration • Shared interests of the child and non-custodial parent • Non-custodial parent’s involvement in the child’s school, community, religious, or other related activities • Non-custodial parent’s availability to care for the child when the custodial parent is working or has other obligations • Chronic pattern of missing, cancelling or denying regularly scheduled parenting time • Parent-time schedule of siblings • Lack of reasonable alternatives for nursing child • Any other criteria the court feels is relevant to the best interests of the child
How Can a Family Law Attorney Help Represent Your Case?
Divorce and all legal issues associated with this pivotal life event can be resolved through negotiation, mediation and dynamic representation in trial. Legal elements connected to divorce include custody, visitation and asset and property division. Family Attorney can help you with a number of issues related to family law including, but not limited to: • Asset and property division is a fair and just distribution of marital property and debts. • Child Custody includes disputed cases. In sole physical custody the most able parent, best equipped to provide a safe, stable and healthy environment is selected. Visitation can be a part of this to help the noncustodial parent continue a relationship with the child. • Shared custody means that both parents demonstrate the ability to cooperate and communicate in sharing responsibility for a child. • Visitation involves the creation of comprehensive parenting plans suited to individual family circumstances. They protect your children’s well-being and your vital relationship with them. • Child support Utah courts recommend that you consult an attorney about child support. This is because calculating child support can be very complicated. It’s possible to limit your consultation to this or other aspects of your case. • Protection orders are often necessitated when domestic violence is threatened. They may also be requested by a party seeking to gain an advantage in a custody dispute. • Adoption and guardianship are alternatives that enable other responsible caregivers such as stepparents and grandparents the legal right to make important decisions regarding the welfare and protection of children. • Paternity actions can be made on behalf of either a mother or father who chooses to take responsibility and seeks to claim custody or visitation rights. • Prenuptual and Postnuptual Agreements can not only help protect assets, but it can also help clarify any debt issues. We live in a time when divorce is more common, it is always wise to be informed. • Mediation is required by Utah Law for Divorcing Spouses • Divorce Modification is the legal process of amending a divorce order issued by a court. • Virtual Visitation is a broad phrase that refers to any use of technology that a parent uses to keep in contact with his or her child. • Parental Kidnapping or parental abduction is defined as the concealment, taking, or retention of a child by his parent in violation of the rights of the child’s other parent or another family member. • Grandparent’s Rights – Grandparents are heavily involved in child rearing in many families, sometimes as the primary caretakers. Under Utah divorce law, individuals that wish to end their marriage can do so on either fault or no-fault grounds. No-fault based divorces are the most common in Utah and are normally much faster and less expensive than proving a fault based divorce. The requirements for a no-fault divorce in Utah are particularly stringent when compared to other states and can be found here at Title 30 Chapter 3 Section 1 of the Utah Code. A no fault divorce is found under Utah Code 30-3-1(3)(h) where it states: “irreconcilable differences of the marriage.” This essentially means that the marriage did not work out and neither spouse is placing blame on the other or saying that one person did something to cause the divorce. While proving irreconcilable differences may be enough to receive a no-fault divorce award, the divorcing couples can also receive a no-fault divorce if they have lived separate and apart for at least three years, while other states typically require between 3-18 months of living separate and apart. This is found in Utah Code 30-3-1(3) (j): “ when the husband and wife have lived separately under a decree of separate maintenance of any state for three consecutive years without cohabitation.” If a no-fault divorce is not possible, a fault divorce can be granted one of the following grounds are proven with evidence and testimony before a Utah divorce judge: Grounds for divorce: • Impotency of the respondent at the time of marriage; • Adultery committed by the respondent subsequent to marriage; • Wilful desertion of the petitioner by the respondent for more than one year; • wilful neglect of the respondent to provide for the petitioner the common necessaries of life; • habitual drunkenness of the respondent; • conviction of the respondent for a felony; • cruel treatment of the petitioner by the respondent to the extent of causing bodily injury or great mental distress to the petitioner; • irreconcilable differences of the marriage; • incurable insanity; or • when the husband and wife have lived separately under a decree of separate maintenance of any state for three consecutive years without cohabitation.
Family Law Attorney Free Consultation
When you need legal help with family law in Utah, please call Ascent Law for your free consultation (801) 676-5506. We want to help you. We can help you with:
Family Law
Divorce
Child Custody
Guardianship
Adoption
Child Support
Alimony
And More.
Ascent Law LLC 8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite C West Jordan, Utah 84088 United States Telephone: (801) 676-5506
Ascent Law LLC
4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews
Recent Posts
How Do I Look Up My USDOT Number?
Search And Seizure Issues And The Fourth Amendment
Discharging Student Loans In Bankruptcy
I Got A New Job, Can I Still File Bankruptcy?
SEC Charges Executives With Stealing
Utah Injury Lawyer
from Michael Anderson https://www.ascentlawfirm.com/family-law-in-ut/
from Criminal Defense Lawyer West Jordan Utah https://criminaldefenselawyerwestjordanutah.wordpress.com/2020/06/03/family-law-in-ut/
0 notes
advertphoto · 4 years
Text
Family Law In UT
In Utah, domestic violence means any criminal offense involving physical harm (or the threat of physical harm), or any attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit a criminal offense involving violence or physical harm, when committed by one cohabitant against another. A cohabitant can only be someone who is at least 16 years old (or is emancipated) who: • Is or was a spouse of the other party • Is or was living as if a spouse of the other party • Is related by blood or marriage to the other party • Has or had one or more children in common with the other party • Is the biological parent of the other party’s unborn child, or • Resides or has resided in the same residence as the other party However, cohabitants don’t include parents and their children, or siblings who are less than 18 years old.
youtube
Child Custody and Domestic Violence
When parents decide to get a divorce, the custody arrangement for their children can either be determined mutually by the parents or, if the parents can’t reach an agreement, by the court. When determining the future care and custody of a child the court considers the best interests of the child. Custody matters can become complicated when one parent alleges that the other has committed domestic violence in the past. In ordinary cases there is a rebuttable presumption that joint legal custody is in the best interest of the child, however, this presumption is overcome if there is domestic violence in the home or in the presence of the child. The following chart outlines how a family law court designs parenting plans in Utah when domestic violence has been committed within the family. During marriage, couples acquire the rights to some of the property and assets, as well as debts, acquired by one or both of them. Marital property doesn’t include things that are considered “separate property” owned by either spouse, for example, property owned before marriage, inheritance, gifts, property specifically excluded by valid prenuptial agreements, and property gained after legally separating. In addition, keep in mind that you are also on the hook still for your separate debts from before marriage.
youtube
There are two ways states divide marital property: • equitable distribution and • Community property. Utah is an equitable distribution or common law state, which is the majority marital property legal system. However, large numbers of people, especially in the Western U.S., live in community property states. This means marital property in Utah isn’t automatically assumed to be owned by both spouses and therefore should be divided equally in a divorce. In Utah, marital property is divided “equitably” or fairly, which may not be an even 50-50. Usually for longer marriages, it is about 50% to each party. For short-term marriages, the court generally puts people back to their position before the marriage, such as giving people what they had before the marriage and typically what they made during the marriage. Parties can agree on how they want to divide the property outside of court, but a judge will review it to ensure it’s fair.
Community Property: Utah is an equitable distribution state that doesn’t have community property laws. However, Utah has enacted the Uniform Disposition of Community Property Rights at Death Act (UDCPRDA). The UCDPRDA allows a person who lived in a state with community property for its marital property laws (such as Nevada and Idaho) and then moved to a state without community property (namely, Utah) to not lose any pre-existing property rights.
youtube
Utah Marriage Age Requirements Laws
Each state regulates marriage. Adult couples can decide whether or when to marry, including gay and lesbian couples where same-sex marriage has been legalized, which includes Utah since October 2014. However, if under the legal age of adulthood in a state, parents, guardians, or the court, in some situations, must provide permission for a child to marry. Even then, there’s usually a minimum age to prevent very young children from marrying. Some states, including Utah, require premarital counselling. Utah encourages the use of premarital counselling by persons seeking to marry who are under 19 years old or who’ve been previously divorced. Depending on which county in Utah you live in, premarital counselling may be a prerequisite for getting a marriage license. Minimum Legal Age without Parental Consent of both men and women who are at least 18 years old can legally marry in Utah without the permission of anyone else, including parents or religious leaders.
Minimum Legal Age with Parental Consent of Teenage boys and girls who are at least 16 years old, but are not yet 18 years old can get married in Utah with the consent of their parents or guardians.
Who must consent depends on the youth’s circumstances: • If the child’s parents are married, either parent can sign consent to the marriage • If the parents are divorced and only one parent has legal custody, then he or she must consent to the marriage • If the parents are divorced and both have joint custody, then the parent with physical custody the majority of the time must consent • If the child lives with a guardian rather than parents, the guardian must provide proof of guardianship and sign consent to the marriage
youtube
Minimum Age for First Cousin Marriage Utah permits first cousins to marry as long as both parties are at least 65 years old, or both parties are at least 55 years old and the local district court has determined that either party is unable to reproduce. In order to get legally married in Utah a couple must have a valid marriage license and have the marriage solemnized. Marriage licenses in Utah are issued by the county clerk where you intend to get married. In order to apply for a marriage license, both parties must be present and provide the following information and documentation to the clerk: • Full name, address, and date and place of birth of both parties • Both parties’ social security cards (unless a party doesn’t have a social security number) • The names and birth places of both parties’ parents (including their mothers’ maiden name) • A valid picture ID for both parties (such as a passport, birth certificate, drivers license, or state ID card), and • A license fee (most counties charge a fee) Family law courts in Utah determine how much child support a non-custodial parent (a parent who doesn’t live with their minor child) is required to pay by using the state’s child support guidelines. These guidelines take into consideration both parents’ gross incomes and the number of children that they have together. The court will follow the child support guidelines unless there is substantial evidence to rebut the guidelines. In order to determine whether or not to deviate from the guidelines the court will consider: • The standard of living of the parents • The relative wealth and income of the parents • The ability of the non-custodial parent to earn • The ability of the custodial parent to earn • The ability of an incapacitated adult child to earn, or other benefits received by an adult child • The needs of the custodial parent, the non-custodial parent, and the child • The ages of the parties, and • The responsibilities of the custodial parent and the non-custodial parent for the support of others Gross income includes perspective income from any source. For example: salaries, wages, commissions, royalties, bonuses, rents, gifts, prizes, dividends, severance pay, interest, alimony from a previous marriage, Social Security benefits, etc. Gross income doesn’t include means-tested welfare benefits that a parent receives. Adjusted gross income is calculated by subtracting alimony previously ordered and paid and child support previously ordered from the parent’s gross income. Each parent’s child support obligation is established in proportion to their adjusted gross incomes by following these steps: • Step 1: Combine the adjusted gross incomes of the parents • Step 2: Look up the base combined child support obligation using this chart • Step 3: Take the appropriate figure from the chart and multiply it by each parent’s percentage of the combined adjusted gross income The court won’t follow the child support guidelines above if: The parents have joint physical custody or split custody, or the non-custodial parent’s adjusted gross income is $1,050 or less per month Imputed Income In Utah, if a parent is unemployed or underemployed the court may impute an income on the parent in order to perform the child support calculations in the chart above. Imputed income is based on employment potential and probable earnings. This figure is calculated from employment opportunities, work history, occupation qualifications, and prevailing earnings for people of similar backgrounds in the community. If a parent doesn’t have recent work history, or if their occupation is unknown, then the court can impute income on the parent at the federal minimum wage for a 40-hour workweek. However, income can’t be imputed if any of the following conditions exist (and aren’t temporary in nature):
youtube
• The reasonable costs of child care for the parents’ minor children equals the amount of income that the custodial parent can earn • A parent is physically or mentally unable to earn the minimum wage, or • The unusual emotional or physical needs of a child requires the custodial parent to stay home and care for them
Utah Child Abuse Laws
Criminal statutes are in place to keep people safe. Utah’s child abuse laws are designed to protect children from harm by prohibiting the physical, emotional, and sexual abuse of children. These child abuse statutes assist in prosecuting child abusers and mandate certain third parties and professionals with access to children to report knowledge or suspicion of child abuse to the authorities. Utah’s Department of Child and Family Services also provides resources state-wide to protect the welfare of children.
Utah Child Custody Laws
When a couple with children breaks up, the responsibility to care for the children must be shared by both parents. An important aspect is child custody or with whom the child will live with and what visitation with the other parent will be like. Another part of this responsibility is financial support, in the form of child support. Utah family courts, like those in most states, determine child custody matters using the “best interests of the child.” The factors considered by the judge include: • Past conduct and demonstrated moral standards of the parties • Parent most likely to act in the best interest of the child, including allowing child frequent contact with non-custodial parent • Bonding between each parent and the child • If a parent has intentionally exposed the child to pornography or other harmful sexual-related materials • Physical, psychological, and emotional needs of the child • Both parent’s ability to reach shared decisions for the child and prioritize the child’s welfare • If both parents participated in raising the child before the divorce • The geographic proximity of the parents’ homes • The child’s preferences • Parents ability to protect child from their conflict • Past and present ability to cooperate with each other in parenting and making decisions • Any history of child abuse, domestic violence, or kidnapping • Any other relevant factors When parents can’t develop their own parenting schedule, the court can establish an appropriate schedule more or less than the statutory minimum parent-time based on the following best interest of the child factors: • How parent-time would negative impact child’s physical health and emotional development • Distance between child’s home and the non-custodial parent’s home • Allegations of child abuse • Lack of demonstrated parenting skills when there’s no safeguards to ensure child’s safety • Financial inability of non-custodial parent to provide food and shelter during parent-time • Child’s preference, if sufficiently mature • Parent’s incarceration • Shared interests of the child and non-custodial parent • Non-custodial parent’s involvement in the child’s school, community, religious, or other related activities • Non-custodial parent’s availability to care for the child when the custodial parent is working or has other obligations • Chronic pattern of missing, cancelling or denying regularly scheduled parenting time • Parent-time schedule of siblings • Lack of reasonable alternatives for nursing child • Any other criteria the court feels is relevant to the best interests of the child
How Can a Family Law Attorney Help Represent Your Case?
Divorce and all legal issues associated with this pivotal life event can be resolved through negotiation, mediation and dynamic representation in trial. Legal elements connected to divorce include custody, visitation and asset and property division. Family Attorney can help you with a number of issues related to family law including, but not limited to: • Asset and property division is a fair and just distribution of marital property and debts. • Child Custody includes disputed cases. In sole physical custody the most able parent, best equipped to provide a safe, stable and healthy environment is selected. Visitation can be a part of this to help the noncustodial parent continue a relationship with the child. • Shared custody means that both parents demonstrate the ability to cooperate and communicate in sharing responsibility for a child. • Visitation involves the creation of comprehensive parenting plans suited to individual family circumstances. They protect your children’s well-being and your vital relationship with them. • Child support Utah courts recommend that you consult an attorney about child support. This is because calculating child support can be very complicated. It’s possible to limit your consultation to this or other aspects of your case. • Protection orders are often necessitated when domestic violence is threatened. They may also be requested by a party seeking to gain an advantage in a custody dispute. • Adoption and guardianship are alternatives that enable other responsible caregivers such as stepparents and grandparents the legal right to make important decisions regarding the welfare and protection of children. • Paternity actions can be made on behalf of either a mother or father who chooses to take responsibility and seeks to claim custody or visitation rights. • Prenuptual and Postnuptual Agreements can not only help protect assets, but it can also help clarify any debt issues. We live in a time when divorce is more common, it is always wise to be informed. • Mediation is required by Utah Law for Divorcing Spouses • Divorce Modification is the legal process of amending a divorce order issued by a court. • Virtual Visitation is a broad phrase that refers to any use of technology that a parent uses to keep in contact with his or her child. • Parental Kidnapping or parental abduction is defined as the concealment, taking, or retention of a child by his parent in violation of the rights of the child’s other parent or another family member. • Grandparent’s Rights – Grandparents are heavily involved in child rearing in many families, sometimes as the primary caretakers. Under Utah divorce law, individuals that wish to end their marriage can do so on either fault or no-fault grounds. No-fault based divorces are the most common in Utah and are normally much faster and less expensive than proving a fault based divorce. The requirements for a no-fault divorce in Utah are particularly stringent when compared to other states and can be found here at Title 30 Chapter 3 Section 1 of the Utah Code. A no fault divorce is found under Utah Code 30-3-1(3)(h) where it states: “irreconcilable differences of the marriage.” This essentially means that the marriage did not work out and neither spouse is placing blame on the other or saying that one person did something to cause the divorce. While proving irreconcilable differences may be enough to receive a no-fault divorce award, the divorcing couples can also receive a no-fault divorce if they have lived separate and apart for at least three years, while other states typically require between 3-18 months of living separate and apart. This is found in Utah Code 30-3-1(3) (j): “ when the husband and wife have lived separately under a decree of separate maintenance of any state for three consecutive years without cohabitation.” If a no-fault divorce is not possible, a fault divorce can be granted one of the following grounds are proven with evidence and testimony before a Utah divorce judge: Grounds for divorce: • Impotency of the respondent at the time of marriage; • Adultery committed by the respondent subsequent to marriage; • Wilful desertion of the petitioner by the respondent for more than one year; • wilful neglect of the respondent to provide for the petitioner the common necessaries of life; • habitual drunkenness of the respondent; • conviction of the respondent for a felony; • cruel treatment of the petitioner by the respondent to the extent of causing bodily injury or great mental distress to the petitioner; • irreconcilable differences of the marriage; • incurable insanity; or • when the husband and wife have lived separately under a decree of separate maintenance of any state for three consecutive years without cohabitation.
Family Law Attorney Free Consultation
When you need legal help with family law in Utah, please call Ascent Law for your free consultation (801) 676-5506. We want to help you. We can help you with:
Family Law
Divorce
Child Custody
Guardianship
Adoption
Child Support
Alimony
And More.
Ascent Law LLC 8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite C West Jordan, Utah 84088 United States Telephone: (801) 676-5506
Ascent Law LLC
4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews
Recent Posts
How Do I Look Up My USDOT Number?
Search And Seizure Issues And The Fourth Amendment
Discharging Student Loans In Bankruptcy
I Got A New Job, Can I Still File Bankruptcy?
SEC Charges Executives With Stealing
Utah Injury Lawyer
Source: https://www.ascentlawfirm.com/family-law-in-ut/
0 notes
mayarosa47 · 4 years
Text
Family Law In UT
In Utah, domestic violence means any criminal offense involving physical harm (or the threat of physical harm), or any attempt, conspiracy, or solicitation to commit a criminal offense involving violence or physical harm, when committed by one cohabitant against another. A cohabitant can only be someone who is at least 16 years old (or is emancipated) who: • Is or was a spouse of the other party • Is or was living as if a spouse of the other party • Is related by blood or marriage to the other party • Has or had one or more children in common with the other party • Is the biological parent of the other party’s unborn child, or • Resides or has resided in the same residence as the other party However, cohabitants don’t include parents and their children, or siblings who are less than 18 years old.
Child Custody and Domestic Violence
When parents decide to get a divorce, the custody arrangement for their children can either be determined mutually by the parents or, if the parents can’t reach an agreement, by the court. When determining the future care and custody of a child the court considers the best interests of the child. Custody matters can become complicated when one parent alleges that the other has committed domestic violence in the past. In ordinary cases there is a rebuttable presumption that joint legal custody is in the best interest of the child, however, this presumption is overcome if there is domestic violence in the home or in the presence of the child. The following chart outlines how a family law court designs parenting plans in Utah when domestic violence has been committed within the family. During marriage, couples acquire the rights to some of the property and assets, as well as debts, acquired by one or both of them. Marital property doesn’t include things that are considered “separate property” owned by either spouse, for example, property owned before marriage, inheritance, gifts, property specifically excluded by valid prenuptial agreements, and property gained after legally separating. In addition, keep in mind that you are also on the hook still for your separate debts from before marriage.
There are two ways states divide marital property: • equitable distribution and • Community property. Utah is an equitable distribution or common law state, which is the majority marital property legal system. However, large numbers of people, especially in the Western U.S., live in community property states. This means marital property in Utah isn’t automatically assumed to be owned by both spouses and therefore should be divided equally in a divorce. In Utah, marital property is divided “equitably” or fairly, which may not be an even 50-50. Usually for longer marriages, it is about 50% to each party. For short-term marriages, the court generally puts people back to their position before the marriage, such as giving people what they had before the marriage and typically what they made during the marriage. Parties can agree on how they want to divide the property outside of court, but a judge will review it to ensure it’s fair.
Community Property: Utah is an equitable distribution state that doesn’t have community property laws. However, Utah has enacted the Uniform Disposition of Community Property Rights at Death Act (UDCPRDA). The UCDPRDA allows a person who lived in a state with community property for its marital property laws (such as Nevada and Idaho) and then moved to a state without community property (namely, Utah) to not lose any pre-existing property rights.
Utah Marriage Age Requirements Laws
Each state regulates marriage. Adult couples can decide whether or when to marry, including gay and lesbian couples where same-sex marriage has been legalized, which includes Utah since October 2014. However, if under the legal age of adulthood in a state, parents, guardians, or the court, in some situations, must provide permission for a child to marry. Even then, there’s usually a minimum age to prevent very young children from marrying. Some states, including Utah, require premarital counselling. Utah encourages the use of premarital counselling by persons seeking to marry who are under 19 years old or who’ve been previously divorced. Depending on which county in Utah you live in, premarital counselling may be a prerequisite for getting a marriage license. Minimum Legal Age without Parental Consent of both men and women who are at least 18 years old can legally marry in Utah without the permission of anyone else, including parents or religious leaders.
Minimum Legal Age with Parental Consent of Teenage boys and girls who are at least 16 years old, but are not yet 18 years old can get married in Utah with the consent of their parents or guardians.
Who must consent depends on the youth’s circumstances: • If the child’s parents are married, either parent can sign consent to the marriage • If the parents are divorced and only one parent has legal custody, then he or she must consent to the marriage • If the parents are divorced and both have joint custody, then the parent with physical custody the majority of the time must consent • If the child lives with a guardian rather than parents, the guardian must provide proof of guardianship and sign consent to the marriage
Minimum Age for First Cousin Marriage Utah permits first cousins to marry as long as both parties are at least 65 years old, or both parties are at least 55 years old and the local district court has determined that either party is unable to reproduce. In order to get legally married in Utah a couple must have a valid marriage license and have the marriage solemnized. Marriage licenses in Utah are issued by the county clerk where you intend to get married. In order to apply for a marriage license, both parties must be present and provide the following information and documentation to the clerk: • Full name, address, and date and place of birth of both parties • Both parties’ social security cards (unless a party doesn’t have a social security number) • The names and birth places of both parties’ parents (including their mothers’ maiden name) • A valid picture ID for both parties (such as a passport, birth certificate, drivers license, or state ID card), and • A license fee (most counties charge a fee) Family law courts in Utah determine how much child support a non-custodial parent (a parent who doesn’t live with their minor child) is required to pay by using the state’s child support guidelines. These guidelines take into consideration both parents’ gross incomes and the number of children that they have together. The court will follow the child support guidelines unless there is substantial evidence to rebut the guidelines. In order to determine whether or not to deviate from the guidelines the court will consider: • The standard of living of the parents • The relative wealth and income of the parents • The ability of the non-custodial parent to earn • The ability of the custodial parent to earn • The ability of an incapacitated adult child to earn, or other benefits received by an adult child • The needs of the custodial parent, the non-custodial parent, and the child • The ages of the parties, and • The responsibilities of the custodial parent and the non-custodial parent for the support of others Gross income includes perspective income from any source. For example: salaries, wages, commissions, royalties, bonuses, rents, gifts, prizes, dividends, severance pay, interest, alimony from a previous marriage, Social Security benefits, etc. Gross income doesn’t include means-tested welfare benefits that a parent receives. Adjusted gross income is calculated by subtracting alimony previously ordered and paid and child support previously ordered from the parent’s gross income. Each parent’s child support obligation is established in proportion to their adjusted gross incomes by following these steps: • Step 1: Combine the adjusted gross incomes of the parents • Step 2: Look up the base combined child support obligation using this chart • Step 3: Take the appropriate figure from the chart and multiply it by each parent’s percentage of the combined adjusted gross income The court won’t follow the child support guidelines above if: The parents have joint physical custody or split custody, or the non-custodial parent’s adjusted gross income is $1,050 or less per month Imputed Income In Utah, if a parent is unemployed or underemployed the court may impute an income on the parent in order to perform the child support calculations in the chart above. Imputed income is based on employment potential and probable earnings. This figure is calculated from employment opportunities, work history, occupation qualifications, and prevailing earnings for people of similar backgrounds in the community. If a parent doesn’t have recent work history, or if their occupation is unknown, then the court can impute income on the parent at the federal minimum wage for a 40-hour workweek. However, income can’t be imputed if any of the following conditions exist (and aren’t temporary in nature):
• The reasonable costs of child care for the parents’ minor children equals the amount of income that the custodial parent can earn • A parent is physically or mentally unable to earn the minimum wage, or • The unusual emotional or physical needs of a child requires the custodial parent to stay home and care for them
Utah Child Abuse Laws
Criminal statutes are in place to keep people safe. Utah’s child abuse laws are designed to protect children from harm by prohibiting the physical, emotional, and sexual abuse of children. These child abuse statutes assist in prosecuting child abusers and mandate certain third parties and professionals with access to children to report knowledge or suspicion of child abuse to the authorities. Utah’s Department of Child and Family Services also provides resources state-wide to protect the welfare of children.
Utah Child Custody Laws
When a couple with children breaks up, the responsibility to care for the children must be shared by both parents. An important aspect is child custody or with whom the child will live with and what visitation with the other parent will be like. Another part of this responsibility is financial support, in the form of child support. Utah family courts, like those in most states, determine child custody matters using the “best interests of the child.” The factors considered by the judge include: • Past conduct and demonstrated moral standards of the parties • Parent most likely to act in the best interest of the child, including allowing child frequent contact with non-custodial parent • Bonding between each parent and the child • If a parent has intentionally exposed the child to pornography or other harmful sexual-related materials • Physical, psychological, and emotional needs of the child • Both parent’s ability to reach shared decisions for the child and prioritize the child’s welfare • If both parents participated in raising the child before the divorce • The geographic proximity of the parents’ homes • The child’s preferences • Parents ability to protect child from their conflict • Past and present ability to cooperate with each other in parenting and making decisions • Any history of child abuse, domestic violence, or kidnapping • Any other relevant factors When parents can’t develop their own parenting schedule, the court can establish an appropriate schedule more or less than the statutory minimum parent-time based on the following best interest of the child factors: • How parent-time would negative impact child’s physical health and emotional development • Distance between child’s home and the non-custodial parent’s home • Allegations of child abuse • Lack of demonstrated parenting skills when there’s no safeguards to ensure child’s safety • Financial inability of non-custodial parent to provide food and shelter during parent-time • Child’s preference, if sufficiently mature • Parent’s incarceration • Shared interests of the child and non-custodial parent • Non-custodial parent’s involvement in the child’s school, community, religious, or other related activities • Non-custodial parent’s availability to care for the child when the custodial parent is working or has other obligations • Chronic pattern of missing, cancelling or denying regularly scheduled parenting time • Parent-time schedule of siblings • Lack of reasonable alternatives for nursing child • Any other criteria the court feels is relevant to the best interests of the child
How Can a Family Law Attorney Help Represent Your Case?
Divorce and all legal issues associated with this pivotal life event can be resolved through negotiation, mediation and dynamic representation in trial. Legal elements connected to divorce include custody, visitation and asset and property division. Family Attorney can help you with a number of issues related to family law including, but not limited to: • Asset and property division is a fair and just distribution of marital property and debts. • Child Custody includes disputed cases. In sole physical custody the most able parent, best equipped to provide a safe, stable and healthy environment is selected. Visitation can be a part of this to help the noncustodial parent continue a relationship with the child. • Shared custody means that both parents demonstrate the ability to cooperate and communicate in sharing responsibility for a child. • Visitation involves the creation of comprehensive parenting plans suited to individual family circumstances. They protect your children’s well-being and your vital relationship with them. • Child support Utah courts recommend that you consult an attorney about child support. This is because calculating child support can be very complicated. It’s possible to limit your consultation to this or other aspects of your case. • Protection orders are often necessitated when domestic violence is threatened. They may also be requested by a party seeking to gain an advantage in a custody dispute. • Adoption and guardianship are alternatives that enable other responsible caregivers such as stepparents and grandparents the legal right to make important decisions regarding the welfare and protection of children. • Paternity actions can be made on behalf of either a mother or father who chooses to take responsibility and seeks to claim custody or visitation rights. • Prenuptual and Postnuptual Agreements can not only help protect assets, but it can also help clarify any debt issues. We live in a time when divorce is more common, it is always wise to be informed. • Mediation is required by Utah Law for Divorcing Spouses • Divorce Modification is the legal process of amending a divorce order issued by a court. • Virtual Visitation is a broad phrase that refers to any use of technology that a parent uses to keep in contact with his or her child. • Parental Kidnapping or parental abduction is defined as the concealment, taking, or retention of a child by his parent in violation of the rights of the child’s other parent or another family member. • Grandparent’s Rights – Grandparents are heavily involved in child rearing in many families, sometimes as the primary caretakers. Under Utah divorce law, individuals that wish to end their marriage can do so on either fault or no-fault grounds. No-fault based divorces are the most common in Utah and are normally much faster and less expensive than proving a fault based divorce. The requirements for a no-fault divorce in Utah are particularly stringent when compared to other states and can be found here at Title 30 Chapter 3 Section 1 of the Utah Code. A no fault divorce is found under Utah Code 30-3-1(3)(h) where it states: “irreconcilable differences of the marriage.” This essentially means that the marriage did not work out and neither spouse is placing blame on the other or saying that one person did something to cause the divorce. While proving irreconcilable differences may be enough to receive a no-fault divorce award, the divorcing couples can also receive a no-fault divorce if they have lived separate and apart for at least three years, while other states typically require between 3-18 months of living separate and apart. This is found in Utah Code 30-3-1(3) (j): “ when the husband and wife have lived separately under a decree of separate maintenance of any state for three consecutive years without cohabitation.” If a no-fault divorce is not possible, a fault divorce can be granted one of the following grounds are proven with evidence and testimony before a Utah divorce judge: Grounds for divorce: • Impotency of the respondent at the time of marriage; • Adultery committed by the respondent subsequent to marriage; • Wilful desertion of the petitioner by the respondent for more than one year; • wilful neglect of the respondent to provide for the petitioner the common necessaries of life; • habitual drunkenness of the respondent; • conviction of the respondent for a felony; • cruel treatment of the petitioner by the respondent to the extent of causing bodily injury or great mental distress to the petitioner; • irreconcilable differences of the marriage; • incurable insanity; or • when the husband and wife have lived separately under a decree of separate maintenance of any state for three consecutive years without cohabitation.
Family Law Attorney Free Consultation
When you need legal help with family law in Utah, please call Ascent Law for your free consultation (801) 676-5506. We want to help you. We can help you with:
Family Law
Divorce
Child Custody
Guardianship
Adoption
Child Support
Alimony
And More.
Ascent Law LLC 8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite C West Jordan, Utah 84088 United States Telephone: (801) 676-5506
Ascent Law LLC
4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews
Recent Posts
How Do I Look Up My USDOT Number?
Search And Seizure Issues And The Fourth Amendment
Discharging Student Loans In Bankruptcy
I Got A New Job, Can I Still File Bankruptcy?
SEC Charges Executives With Stealing
Utah Injury Lawyer
from https://www.ascentlawfirm.com/family-law-in-ut/
from Criminal Defense Lawyer West Jordan Utah - Blog http://criminaldefenselawyerwestjordanutah.weebly.com/blog/family-law-in-ut
0 notes