Lit: if anyone dares to bother you I'LL KI—
Lit: (trying to backtrack)
Lit: ...kiss. Kiss them.
Apollo:
Apollo: What?!? 😱
152 notes
·
View notes
KHSFYITESFJKHKSD ok i DO understand the point being made and how the immutability of comics canon events seems to depend largely on how much a reader liked a given plot more than anything else, but Jason is like the WORST example you could use. Yes! The fans did literally kill him it was put to PUBLIC VOTE! Writing always involves the creation of conflict but Jim Starlin did NOT make that call unilaterally the crowbar IS in the reader's hand (or at least the voter's). Especially as modern comics increasingly lean on the 4th wall and include metatext as a plot point, YES there is ABSOLUTELY a reading where the writer and audience are as much "characters" as the city of Gotham itself even if we never show on-panel.
293 notes
·
View notes
there is no real meaningful distinction between Art and Craft, however i personally can only do the type of Art that is also extremely Craft. i need to make physical things with my hands and use tools and manipulate little objects and hoard all the specialized knives. otherwise i will start biting.
91 notes
·
View notes
I was writing a poem about love at school and a friend of mine saw me and decided to help me out. I am very satisfied with how it turned out and it is my favorite poem so far
(he didn't know the poem was about love btw, he just saw some of my lines completely out of context and just rolled with it)
12 notes
·
View notes
crying laughing @ this edition of le fantôme de l'opéra that my dad got me for christmas it's just. i don't know how to describe it. every page is a scan of a page of the 1926 edition, with like 1-2 inches of margin around it??? and the letters are so small and the scan is not of very great quality so it's kind of hard to see the words?? interspersed with scans of pictures but some of them are upside down??? there's one page where the scan didn't really work in the upper left corner so it's just totally black???
the back of the book says
Le présent ouvrage s'inscrit dans une politique de conservation patrimoniale des ouvrages de la littérature Française mise en place avec la BNF. HACHETTE LIVRE et la BNF proposent ainsi un catalogue de titres indisponibles, la BNF ayant numérisé ces œuvres et HACHETTE LIVRE les imprimant à la demande.
(my rough translation: This publication is in line with a policy instituted in conjunction with the BNF (National Library of France) for the conservation of important works of French literature. In service of this goal, Hachette Livre and the BNF are offering a catalogue of unavailable titles digitized by the BNF which Hachette Livre will print upon request.)
so like this is on purpose but i have so many questions. first of all why the margins. okay i guess that is my most important question. why not just make the book correspond to the size of the pages in the original? or, if the size of the book is fixed, you could at least size up the images to use as much of that wasted space as possible, no?
i want to say how ridiculous this is and how there's no market for it but there clearly is one because i asked my dad to get it for me! i'm the market!! i told him to buy this edition because it was the only french-language print edition i could find to buy in the us for less than $50 (outside of amazon because fuck amazon). but like, why is that the case? the full text of this book, in plain text which could easily and legibly be printed, is available for free on the internet. why isn't there some publisher who's just printing that out and binding it? seems easier to do than printing scans. not to mention a lot easier to read!!
(to see what i'm talking about, go to the hachette BNF webpage for this book and click on feuilleter to download a sample of the pages in PDF)
7 notes
·
View notes
Me with Victor Frankenstein 🤝 me with Light Yagami
*clenches fists* It's not about the god complex Oh my god. God complex is only useful in a Christian ish interpretation. But these characters care little about religion so "defying it" isn't their main motivation and shouldn't be what we use to describe their ambitions most of the time. Hannibal Lecter is more obsessed with god than these guys. There are other ways to describe ambition/wanting power. The issue isn't that they were trying to defy nature or whatever, the issue is that they didn't take responsibility for their actions/had a flawed ideology and literally killed people. Like I understand that it's tempting to say "haha this bitch crazy he literally thought he was gonna become god lmao what a freak" but that's not very accurate and extremely surface level. It was also exadurated in adaptions in both cases
75 notes
·
View notes