Tumgik
#radfems don't touch
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
503 notes · View notes
homo-adaptionem · 3 months
Text
I hate that radfems have claimed the uterus as a symbol because it's honestly such a cool ass organ.
It's the size of like a fist normally, but can grow like ten times it's size when it GROWS A BABY INSIDE OF IT.
When it isn't holding a baby, it sheds it's own inner lining!!! IT FUCKING PEELS ITSELF LEAVING A BLOODY MESS!!! That's so fucking metal!!!
It's such a cool organ! Easily top ten.
16 notes · View notes
limonadecandy · 11 months
Text
men be calling sportspeople fat, useless and a waste of air all the time but any person that isn't a man mentioning they're investigated for rape is where they draw the line and it becomes "defamatory" and "playing the gender card". just say that you're complacent with sexual violence and go.
26 notes · View notes
wolf-tail · 1 year
Text
The fact that women are expected to be "kind and understanding" to men who fall down alt-right pipelines is repulsively misogynistic. Women are allowed to be angry and show no pity to the ones who wish to do them nothing but harm. It's very telling that so many of you expect us to be nurturing to men who literally see us as property. We're not here to "fix" rape apologists by being nice to them. We're allowed to hate their guts.
30 notes · View notes
Text
is there like, a tag for detrans people who aren't transphobic?
5 notes · View notes
queerasaurus-rexx · 5 months
Text
i just think it's really funny how laughably bad radfems and terfs are with feminism.
like, even putting the rampant transphobia aside, modern radical feminism is the only school of feminist thought where misogyny is not only allowed, but expected. only, radfem misogyny flies under a different flag; looking out for women.
women only exist to be oppressed, so says radical feminism, and any woman who denies that is worthy of mockery and derision. the oppression of women is only to be complained about and used as a springboard for hating men. a woman who dares try to use her power to strike back with the tools available to her is lumped in with the other 'bad women' because women using the tools they are oppressed with to fight back is actually just feeding into the patriarchy.
radfem ideology sees no way to change the status quo, because despite how much they claim to want to destroy the patriarchy, they seem to enjoy their perpetual victim status. just ask one to explain why they never discuss how women help uphold patriarchal structures. there is no serious interrogation of this; several radfems have literally told me women will eventually 'figure it out' so it's not worth discussing.
radical feminism says it stands for all women, but radfems routinely go out of their way to mock, slut shame and belittle a class of women they have deemed an acceptable target: 'liberal feminists', which has come to encompass pretty much any feminist who disagrees with them.
in the eyes of the radical feminist, women are not capable of perpetuating misogyny because all womanhood is equal. the two pronged struggle of racialized womanhood that women of colour face is discussed for lip service, but i have yet to meet a radfem willing to interrogate her own place in the social hierarchy in relation to women of colour. to a radfem, sex is the primary axis of oppression women face. to a white radfem, the world is just as dangerous for her as it is for a black woman.
and heaven forbid you ask a white radfem to unpack her own racism. islamophobia and anti-brown racism runs rampant in radfem circles. this one is very contradictory too - muslim women are poor, brainwashed women who must be saved from their oppressors, but also simultaneously educated enough to ALL be radfems.
and this isn't getting into how utterly biased they are regarding pretty privilege. conventionally attractive women get a pass; women who do not fit this mold must secretly be men in disguise. you see this all over twitter and tumblr. how they lament that the 'tras' have made them so paranoid they see any woman with a square jaw and broad shoulders as a secret man in hiding.
if you are this lost in the sauce that you don't even trust the women you claim to want to protect, you are not a feminist, you are two degrees shy of a qanon conspiracy theorist.
3 notes · View notes
kjzx · 4 months
Text
Love how these girlboss self-care and self-improvement women are always like "you have to take care of your body and appearance and dress well" "you also have to be independent do all of that for yourself and not for attention"
It feels like it all comes down to internalising social expectations and the woman social roles just enough to perform them, while also being oblivious enough to think that's just a natural girl thing to do
No judgement to women who do all that if anything I think the aesthetic and the commitment are very attractive but it's particularly interesting when it's branded as self care specifically, it being universal is typically implied. I just know I would never get along with a person who has this as like a life motto
2 notes · View notes
catgirl-catboy · 2 years
Text
Allow me to reminisce about the time I told a radfem her views weren't extreme enough and she should hate everyone, regardless of gender because people are that awful
If you're still out there, I hope you've seen the light.
30 notes · View notes
it-is-i-zim · 1 year
Text
To any radfems who follows me FUCK THE HELL OFF FUCK YOU AND GO THE FUCK AWAY
6 notes · View notes
wantmeifyouwantme · 1 year
Text
soooo i again stumbled upon a radfem blog, and i saw a post that said "transphobia saves lives".
with that logic, one could say "lesbiphobia saves lives" because 1 in 3 lesbians has been sexually assualted by another woman.
this is why terfs are silly, silly, people, because of their blatant double standards.
EDIT: why are terfs and radfems interacting???? please fuck off
19 notes · View notes
Text
my school can NOT handle pride month jesus christ
first day of pride someone was complaining that the pride flag was on the same pole as the usa flag and it was "distespecting" the veterans
the flag was 1/10th the size as the usa flag
it was below both the country and state flag
you think there aren't any gay veterans?
it's literally the only flag pole in the school???? where you want them to put it, on the front entrance??? you'd be crying about that too
second day of pride someone brought a trump 2020 flag to school, wore it as a cape and yelled throughout the flag "GO TRUMP" & "TRUMP 2024" & "F*GGOT MONTH YALL"
cant wait to see what happens next 🥲
3 notes · View notes
moidhaterxxx · 2 months
Text
Where are my women with zero maternal instincts
448 notes · View notes
sweetstarcollector · 10 months
Text
So phrases like "people with uteruses" or "people who have periods" never really bothered me as much as more overtly dehumanizing phrases like "bleeders" or "birthing bodies", but I saw a post today talking about the abnormal symptoms women experienced after getting tear gassed protesting, that ended with something like "we don't know the full effects of tear gas on people with uteruses". And what struck me about that is that's not really correct, because female people without uteruses (either bc they were born without one or bc they had a hysterectomy) will still experience different symptoms after being tear gassed than male people. Women metabolize substances differently than men, our immune systems are different, our hormonal cycles are different, our skin has different thicknesses, etc. All of those things have potential effects on tear gas reactions, and are not dependent on whether or not we have a uterus. They're dependent on whether or not we're female. So saying "people with uteruses" when what is meant is "female people" is not really accurate. And I realized that a lot of times when people use those kinds of phrases, they aren't being accurate.
For example, I'm sure we've all seen people say things about how the repeal of Roe v Wade will harm people with uteruses/people who can get pregnant/etc. And while yes, it definitely harms those people, the full truth is that abortion bans harm *female* people, *regardless of if they can get pregnant or have a uterus.* Because female people who don't have uteruses can still get pregnant, and in those rare cases will 100% of the time need an abortion. Female people who deal with infertility and can't carry a fetus to term can still be jailed for miscarrying. Female people who are completely sterile (for whatever reason) can still be denied medications/medical treatment on the grounds that the treatment could theoretically harm a fetus. Female people who may currently have no uterus/no longer be able to get pregnant but who have had an abortion in the past will face increased stigma.
Here's another example:
Tumblr media
It seems pretty straightforward- menstruation stigma is experienced by people who menstruate. But again, that's only half true. Period stigma is experienced by all female people, regardless of if they menstruate. Think about the fact that we are told female people should not hold political leadership because "what if a female president has PMS and starts a war", despite the fact that almost all female presidential candidates are old enough that they would have experienced menopause. Female people have their feelings dismissed because "it must be that time of the month", regardless of if they're too young to menstruate or too old or if they have a condition causing amenorrhea. Female children grow up seeing periods- a natural function of their bodies- portrayed as disgusting, dirty and gross, as making them unclean, as something to dread and fear. This affects them before they experience menarche, this affects them even if they never experience menarche. It affects all female people.
I could come up with more examples, but you get the idea. Reducing female people to singular body parts and organs inherently denies the reality of femaleness. All parts of us (both biological and social) interact with all other parts of us to form an experience that can't be understood by chopping us up and putting our individual functions under the microscope. In order to get an accurate picture you need to look at the whole (female) human.
1K notes · View notes
hard--headed--woman · 2 months
Text
we seriously need a bigger movement of women refusing to date and have sex with men right now ; feminism won't get anywhere as long as women do not take this kind of radical actions. i know it's a complicated topic since even "radical" feminists on here think it's too much and won't do it (while it's the basis of radical feminism) but i believe it's essential for women's liberation.
making sure men have access to women's bodies is the patriarchy's priority. in its head, that's what women are made for. that's why we are born. we exist to sleep with men - or should i say, to let men fuck us -, to marry them - become their servant and private prostitute - , to give them kids. it's one of the roots of the patriarchy. if we want to destroy the patriarchy, we have to destroy the roots. we have to destroy this root.
in history, feminism got somewhere everytime women took big actions against the patriarchy. posts are good, little actions help, but we need to make real noise. de frapper un grand coup. this way, we will be safer, and the patriarchy will be severly wounded.
365 notes · View notes
wolf-tail · 1 year
Text
"No more feminist retellings of-" Actually, more feminist retellings actually. But ones where women get to violently beat their opressors. We live in a world where Andrew Tate exists and we need to make men like him scared.
19 notes · View notes
radsplain · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
women can't even talk about our own anatomy without having to caveat every single thing we say with "i think all terfs should die btw!!!" like i find it so interesting that this was her very first thought after posting. she knew how the notes were going to eviscerate her for it so she had to beat them to it. this right here is one of the reasons i peaked. any discussion about our bodies always, inevitably, is boiled down to "bioessentialist rhetoric" despite the very valid points it's making. the fact that any discussion we want to have about female anatomy is somehow a "TERF dogwhistle" for simply talking about body parts that half the human population has. and that every conversation like this has to be prefaced with "TERFS can fuck off and DIE!!!" or else risk being ripped to shreds by the gender freaks is so telling of where liberal feminism is today.
1K notes · View notes