Tumgik
#definition of fascism
futurebird · 8 months
Text
There is a lot of anxiety and energy put in to the project of defining fascism. It makes sense. Fascism is (nearly) universally understood to be negative, dangerous, intoxicating. Fascism is the bath salts of political philosophy. A drug terrifying not just because of its degrading effects on the body, but the horror of enacting out atrocities -- but being unable to recognize them as atrocities until sober.
A precise, sorting definition of fascism would be a powerful prophylactic. But, most of the more serious writing on this subject ends up insisting that such a mathematically well-defined definition isn't possible, before moving on to do the important work of highlighting what regimes universally agreed to be fascist have in common. Of course the anxiety and desire for a definition isn't the result of idle historical curiosity. People in many nations, especially the US are worried that fascism is resurgent in the anti-democratic, nationalistic, nostalgic currents in right wing politics. And, it probably is. But the point I'd like to suggest is that even if it weren't "really real fascism" it's not much comfort. The atrocities of the present and the future will earn their own infamous names.
And it's not like presenting proof that something is fascism slows any of them down at all. Just as quickly you will hear "The real fascism are all these people using historical parallels to say that we are fascist." I think there is a good chance we may make it past this dangerous fork in the road. But it won't be the last one we face as climate change demands that we care for and cooperate with each other more than ever or -
-or take the other path.
9 notes · View notes
Text
I gotta say, the politics of Jason Todd's crusade are pretty fucking authoritarian. Forget Jason for a second, I'm taking about the politics, the rhetoric, the actions; it's fucking terrifying and frankly ill-informed. I'll add; the death penalty, as well as being fucking cruel, does not deter crime; it's a historically racist method of coercion and control.
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Source: Batman and Robin #6 and #23
Like what's a crime Jason? Who gets to decide that's undesirable? Who does this institution of "law and order" actually protect and benefit? Who does it actually cripple? What's the history behind this institution and is it actually just? What exactly makes you different to a brutal cop?
And look, I don't care who you like Jason written by and who you don't, I'm not talking about what his favourite Jane Austen book is. I'm talking about the scary as fuck politics of dishing out murder as punishment, treating any breaking of the law as deserving of torture and not even interrogating the unjust history that gave us the rule of law you adhere to so dogmatically. You can't defend a low-lying beach.
Disclaimer: this was not about making moralistic claims about a fictional character, it's about putting a name to a fascist-adjacent politics which authors weren’t pulling their punches in showing.
198 notes · View notes
communistkenobi · 7 months
Text
I’m watching a documentary my friend recommended to me called the law in these parts, which is about the history of israeli military law in palestine, and like. jesus christ they were literally just doing lebensraum. the same low density suburban development that plagues north america, the same plan of fascist expansion eastward done by nazi germany was done in palestine, with the justification that these residential settlements built for settler civilians were actually military outposts and therefore legal under international law. it’s literally just lebensraum
68 notes · View notes
ceruleanmindpalace · 4 months
Text
I am anti-Fascism.
I live in the country that allowed a fascist to rise to power and kill millions. After this Germany made sure to teach every child what fascism looks like (and what dead bodies of Jews, political opponents and gay people piled up in concentration camps) look like, so this never happens again.
Hitler rose to power because he was able to inspire the masses. And people fell for his lies and hate speech. Additionally, people didn't bother or dare to stand up to his shit - or because their friends/families where fascists and they didn't want to step on their toes.
If I stumble into a blog that supports fascism (by spreading pro-MAGA, pro-Trump, pro-racism, anti-LGBTQ+, or anti-democracy stuff) I will block that blog.
I don't want my art to be reblogged in between their pro-fascism shit.
33 notes · View notes
soup-mother · 2 months
Text
while there are obviously very talented people talking about very important topics, a lot of "left wing" video essay YouTube basically just feels like a lot of people making exactly the same points using Ur Fascism by umberto eco and Capitalist Realism by Mark Fisher as their main point of reference and adding maybe one extra original point. obviously there's more nuance than that it's just like... I'm genuinely pleasantly surprised when someone brings them up and actually goes beyond simply restating their ideas and into original and interesting thoughts.
just feels like you might as well credit Umberto eco and mark fisher as your coauthors for the video sometimes.
12 notes · View notes
emoloser2001 · 3 months
Text
i need to write an essay about conservative authoritarianism cause i feel like no one knows what i mean when i say that and it's definitely a phenomenon that intrigues me
7 notes · View notes
parappa-the-killer · 18 days
Text
me when i put 8 slightly different endos dni tags on my poast instead of 32 and some endos start reblobbing my poast
Tumblr media
5 notes · View notes
ritzcuit · 8 months
Text
the proship antiship discourse truly is like the worst thing to happen to me i think. and i cant even rly agree with posts deconstructing it because they focus too much on "these (mostly children) getting angry about content on the internet" and not that it's equally ridiculous for adults to CARE what these ppl think of them...? "block and move on" goes both ways yk yk. well,
speaking from my own experience where the only times ive been harassed from this are By proshippers, coming onto my account. the second time was because i took "proship dni" off my bio, ironically, and all of these people were like "oh you typical anti having the moral backbone of a chocolate eclair, why don't you stand up for what you believe in?"
where 'what i believed in' was, dtepping out of the discourse and no longer calling myself an anti. so. idk why they thought they were winning against me
it's all just so poisonous. and What Is proship. deceptive wording tbh because antis nowadays usually focus on "i don't like seeing fictionalized child porn" and proshippers usually say "ship and let ship, i don't believe people should be harassed for their ships" and it's like. okay well that's not two sides of an argument, that's two statements that can entirely coexist, and it's useless. it's sooo useless.
mostly i'm just getting my own words out, i don't want to Discourse about it, btw. i'm using the blog as a blog. i'm really happier now that i've distanced myself from the concept altogether. not antiship not proship a secret third thing (normal)
10 notes · View notes
flhoarder · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Turn back the wheel of time (aka the one political vision quest I’ll never do)
12 notes · View notes
mewtonian-physics · 9 months
Text
'you can experience life or you can be a fascist' is a very stupid false dichotomy especially in the context of someone being disappointed that you write about incest
9 notes · View notes
decolonize-the-left · 2 years
Note
The court is also coming for ICWA
America is literally turning into Afghanistan
For those unaware,
ICWA (Indian Child Welfare Act) prioritizes placing American Indian children in Native — rather than non-Native — homes in cases of neglect, abuse and adoption. There was a reason for that landmark 1978 legislation:
Thanks to the Indian Adoption Project, a federal drive to assimilate American Indians into white culture, as many as 35 percent of Native children were removed from their families. Eighty-five percent of those children were placed in non-Indian homes, a 1976 study found.
There’s a reason why “forcibly transferring children” from one group to another is an international legal definition of genocide. Taking children has been one strategy for terrorizing Native families for centuries, from the mass removal of Native children from their communities into boarding schools to their widespread adoption and fostering out to mostly white families. It’s what led to the passage of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) of 1978, touchstone legislation that aimed to reverse more than a century of state-sponsored family separation.
Tumblr media
x
Tumblr media
And in case you missed it this goes hand in hand with this:
Tumblr media
115 notes · View notes
communistkenobi · 1 year
Text
I’ve been reflecting a lot on the authoritarian personality recently and the further away I get from that book the more I realise it’s just like fundamentally incorrect. The scope of the research being primarily psychological in nature I think prevents it from reaching any coherent definition of fascism because fascism isn’t a primarily psychological problem lol. I think the book is strongest when Adorno is talking about antisemitism as a foundational part of fascism, and how antisemitism is like a comprehensive structuring force for people’s ideological outlooks, but the moment he or any of the researchers move away from that or try to psychologically profile their research participants it gets really messy. Their psychological discussion about family and its relationship to fascism is fairly interesting, and it was what convinced me that the nuclear family just needs to be fucking abolished completely, but I think that has more to do with the fact that the nuclear family as a social unit naturally fits with fascism because that is the social unit they want to structure society around.
idk I really like that book but it’s deeply flawed. It’s one of those things that you should read alongside people like Fanon and Cesaire, who offer a critique of, respectively, the colonial character of psychology and the colonial nature of fascism, two perspectives that are not present in the authoritarian personality at all. Like I think the best way to approach that book is to fundamentally disagree with its premise (searching for the existence of a fascist “personality” type), and then see what is left salvaging afterwards
46 notes · View notes
selfcare-barbie · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
Yep, I sure am a fascist /s
12 notes · View notes
grendelsmilf · 11 months
Text
Tumblr media
this is a really funny thing to say. in what way does that make him “not a fascist”
16 notes · View notes
realhbomax · 1 month
Text
hate to put anything political on this blog, but im afraid ive seen way too many tumblr users do this, so it needs to be said:
you guys need to stop throwing around the term fascist without even knowing what it means. you're essentially using it as a curse word saying "fuck you you're a fascist" but you don't know what a fascist is? you can't just call anyone you disagree w/ politically a fascist.
i'm not saying america is right--in fact, i disagree with a large portion of the politics going on in america today. there is fascism in america--im not saying there isn't. there has been since it was made. the KKK was fascist, and that was huge during WWII. and of course there was the black legion, the italian americans that were trying to establish fascism in the U.S. by overthrowing the government... but obviously the german american bund.
but what about now? people today are calling every political leader a fascist. if you're conservative, you're immediately a fascist. how does that work?
"fascism" is a diagnosis word, not a curse word. stop using it like one.
2 notes · View notes
panvani · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
Definitely one of the funniest artistic movements in terms of doing this
7 notes · View notes