I think the greatest political victory of anti-maskers here in Canada was shifting the focus of covid precautions from public responsibility to personal risk.
It's no longer about "My mask protects you; your mask protects me," or about keeping your neighbours or loved ones safe. Now it's only about "I'll wear it if it's crowded, otherwise I'm not that worried," and how much of a risk it is *to you*.
You see a lot of people who previously called anti-maskers idiots and would heap blame upon them, but now those same people all stopped wearing masks or taking precautions because "Vaccines are so effective now!" or "There's hardly any [reported] cases!" or "I'm tired of being scared," or "Well it's not going anywhere, and I'm tired of putting my life on pause." And it just becomes very clear that it wasn't ever actually about protecting those around you, (or if it was that it isn't now), but instead it was that everyone was just waiting until they could "start living again" or get back to "normal", and those people were angry because they thought someone was preventing them from living.
I thini that's the real root of it, is simply that most people never knew how to be alive in times of stress, that no matter how shit things get, you're alive and your life is right here and now.
But it's really hard to not read it as betrayal, as a childish selfishness, when someone doesn't wear a mask or do the bare minimum; because well, it's just very clear that it's not about the other people they're hurting, or pushing to the side, they can go back to stores and dance class and bars!!! There's even less people in wheelchairs clogging up the halls, or less people to serve their drinks or staff their business. It's all back to *normal!*
I've been in an abusive or tumultuous home basically all my life. If I decided that my life "started" when I wasn't stressed, I would discount my entire existence, it all just would have been "on pause". I still wear a mask. Everyone else is "back to normal".
It's just very clear that their idea of "normal" doesn't include you, or the people we lost, or the people now being pushed aside.
"Those at-risk will protect themselves," because the disabled and the old and children historically never need help, right? Get a grip. But don't worry, I know you don't feel too afraid to wear that mask that protects me and them, so I'm sure it's fine.
1K notes
·
View notes
Ghosts’ Larry Rickard Explains Why They Chose the Captain’s First Name
Photo: Monumental,Guido Mandozzi
It couldn’t be a joke. That was one rule laid down by the Ghosts creators when it came to choosing a first name for Willbond’s character. Until series five, the WWII ghost had been known only as The Captain – a mystery seized upon by fans of the show.
“It was the question we got asked more than anything. His name,” actor and writer Larry Rickard tells Den of Geek. “Once we got to series three, you could see that we were deliberately cutting away and deliberately avoiding it. We were fuelling the fire because we knew at some point we’d tell them.”
In “Carpe Diem”, the episode written by Rickard and Ben Willbond that finally reveals The Captain’s death story, they did tell us. After years of guessing, clue-spotting and debate, Ghosts revealed that The Captain’s first name is James. At the same time, we also learned that James’ colleague Lieutenant Havers’ first name was Anthony.
The ordinariness of those two names, says Rickard, is the point.
“The only thing we were really clear about is that we didn’t want one of those names that only exists in tellyland. It shouldn’t be ‘Cormoran’ or ‘Endeavour’. They should just be some men’s names and they’re important to them. The point was that they were everyday.”
Choosing first names for The Captain and Havers was a long process not unlike naming a baby, Rickard agrees. “It almost comes down to looking at the faces of the characters and saying, what’s right?”
“We talked for ages. For a long time I kept thinking ‘Duncan and James’, and then I was like ah no! That would have turned it into a gag and been awful!” Inescapably in the minds of a certain generation, Duncan James is a member of noughties boyband Blue. “Maybe with Anthony I was thinking of Anthony Costa!” Rickard says in mock horror, referencing another member of the band.
Lieutenant Havers wasn’t just The Captain’s second in command while stationed at Button House; he was also the man James loved. Because homosexuality was criminalised in England during James’ lifetime, he was forced to hide his feelings for Anthony from society, and to some extent even from himself.
In “Carpe Diem”, the ghosts (mistakenly) prepare for the last day of their afterlives, prompting The Captain to finally tell his story. Though not explicit about his sexual identity, the others understand and accept what he tells them – and led by Lady Button, all agree that he’s a brave man.
Getting the balance right of what The Captain does and doesn’t say was key to the episode. “It wasn’t just a personal choice of his to go ‘I’m going to remain in the closet’,” explains Rickard. “There wasn’t an option there to explore the things that either of them felt. That couldn’t be done back then – there are so many stories which have come out since the War about the dangers of doing that.
“We wanted to tell his personal story but also try to ensure that there was a level at which you understood why they couldn’t be open, that even in this moment where he’s finally telling the other ghosts his story, he never comes out and says it overtly because that would be too much for him as a character from that time.
“He says enough for them to know, and enough for him to feel unburdened but it’s in the fact that they’re using their first names which militarily they would never have done, and in the literal passing of the baton”.
The baton is a bonus reveal when fans learned that The Captain’s military stick wasn’t a memento of his career, but of Havers. As James suffers a fatal heart attack during a VE day celebration at Button House, Anthony rushes to his side and the stick passes from one to the other as they share a moment of tragic understanding.
“From really early on, we had the idea that anything you’re holding [when you die] stays with you. So it wasn’t just your clothes you were wearing, we had the stuff with Thomas’ letter reappearing in his pocket and so on. And the assumption being that it was something The Captain couldn’t put down, it felt so nice to be able to say it was something he didn’t want to put down.”
Rickard lists “Carpe Diem”, co-written with Ben Willbond, among his series five highlights. He’s pleased with the end result, praises Willbond’s performance, and loved being on set to see Button House dressed for the 1940s. He’s particularly pleased that a checklist of moments they wanted to land with the audience all managed to be included. “Normally something’s fallen by the wayside just because of the way TV’s made, it’s always imperfect or it’s slightly rushed, but it feels like it’s all there.”
Rickard and Willbond also knew by this point in the show’s lifetime, that they could trust Ghosts fans to pick up on small details. “Nothing is missed,” he says. “Early on, you’re always thinking, is that going to get across? But once we got to series five, there are little tiny things within corners of shots and you know that’s going to be spotted. Particularly in that very short exchange between Havers and the Captain. We worried less about the minutiae of it because you go, that’s going to be rewound and rewatched, nothing will be missed.”
The team were also grateful they’d resisted the temptation to tell The Captain’s story sooner. “We’d talked about it every series since series two, whether or not now was the time, but because he’s such a hard and starchy character in a lot of ways you needed the time to understand his softer side I think before you had that final honest beat from him.”
“What a ridiculously normal name to have so much weight put on it for five years,” laughs Rickard fondly. “Good old James.”
From Den of Geek
898 notes
·
View notes
hey. imagine your f/o finding fragments of their love for you around them.
they hear a lyric or two from a song they wouldn't usually listen to, but whatever is being said in it - it's exactly how they feel about you. they read a poem that doesn't impress them much otherwise, but there's this one line that speaks to them, reminds them of you or their relationship with you. maybe they overhear a stranger talking about their own love life and they say something that resonates. they totally relate to those famous romantic quotes from classic literature and poetry. you know the ones. even if they're a bit too sappy. maybe they see a beautiful sunset, come across an art piece, a meme, a diary entry, a classical song, an article, ANYTHING, and see their love for you in it.
even if they don't dare to say it to you, they get all soft when it happens. it is delightful when someone else has managed to capture that feeling!!
155 notes
·
View notes
Negative Character Traits. Below is a list of 102 negative traits to describe your character. Bold the ones that fit.
Tagged by: @hunting-songs Thank you!!
Tagging: @effigist, @antinomos, @minban, @blindfoldcd, @furiaei, @gameswillbeplayed, @halchron & whoever else wants to do this!
Aggressive - pursuing one’s aims and interests forcefully, sometimes unduly so
Aloof - not friendly or forthcoming; cool and distant
Arrogant - having or revealing an exaggerated sense of one’s own importance or abilities
Belligerent - hostile and aggressive
Big-headed - conceited or arrogant
Bitchy - malicious or unpleasant
Boastful - showing excessive pride and self-satisfaction in one’s achievements, possessions, or abilities
Bone-idle - lazy
Boring - not interesting; tedious
Bossy - fond of giving people orders; domineering
Callous - showing or having an insensitive and cruel disregard for others
Cantankerous - bad-tempered, argumentative, and uncooperative
Careless - not giving sufficient attention or thought to avoiding harm or errors
Changeable - irregular; inconstant
Clinging - overly dependent on someone emotionally
Compulsive - resulting from or relating to an irresistible urge, especially one that is against one’s conscious wishes
Conservative - a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics
Cowardly - lacking courage
Crass - lacking sensitivity, refinement, or intelligence
Cruel - willfully causing pain or suffering to others, or feeling no concern about it
Cunning - having or showing skill in achieving one’s ends by deceit or evasion
Cynical - believing that people are motivated by self-interest; distrustful of human sincerity or integrity
Deceitful - guilty of or involving deceit; deceiving or misleading others
Detached - separate or disconnected
Dishonest - behaving or prone to behave in an untrustworthy or fraudulent way.*
Dogmatic - inclined to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true
Domineering - assert one’s will over another in an arrogant way*
Fastidious - very attentive to and concerned about accuracy and detail
Finicky - fussy about one’s needs or requirements
Foolish - lacking good sense or judgment; unwise
Foolhardy - recklessly bold or rash
Fussy - fastidious about one’s needs or requirements; hard to please
Greedy - having or showing an intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth or power
Grumpy - bad-tempered and irritable
Gullible - easily persuaded to believe something; credulous
Harsh - cruel or severe
Impatient - having or showing a tendency to be quickly irritated or provoked
Impolite - not having or showing good manners; rude
Impulsive - acting or done without forethought
Inconsiderate - thoughtlessly causing hurt or inconvenience to others
Inconsistent - not compatible or in keeping with
Indecisive - not having or showing the ability to make decisions quickly and effectively
Indiscreet - having, showing, or proceeding from too great a readiness to reveal things that should remain secret or private
Inflexible - unwilling to change or compromise
Interfering - tending to interfere in other people’s affairs
Intolerant - not tolerant of views, beliefs, or behavior that differ from one’s own
Irresponsible - not showing a proper sense of responsibility
Jealous - feeling or showing envy of someone or their achievements and advantages
Lazy - unwilling to work or use energy
Machiavellian - cunning, scheming, and unscrupulous, especially in politics
Materialistic - excessively concerned with material possessions; money-oriented
Mean - one who makes no effort to understand or empathize with others
Miserly - of or characteristic of a miser
Moody - given to unpredictable changes of mood, especially sudden bouts of gloominess or sullenness
Narrow-minded - not willing to listen to or tolerate other people’s views; prejudiced
Nasty - behaving in an unpleasant or spiteful way
Naughty - disobedient; badly behaved
Nervous - easily agitated or alarmed; tending to be anxious; highly strung
Obsessive - a person who is affected by an obsession
Obstinate - stubbornly refusing to change one’s opinion or chosen course of action, despite attempts to persuade one to do so
Overcritical - inclined to find fault too readily
Overemotional - having feelings that are too easily excited and displayed
Parsimonious - unwilling to spend money or use resources; stingy or frugal
Patronizing - apparently kind or helpful but betraying a feeling of superiority; condescending*
Perverse - showing a deliberate and obstinate desire to behave in a way that is unreasonable or unacceptable, often in spite of the consequences
Pessimistic - tending to see the worst aspect of things or believe that the worst will happen
Pompous - affectedly and irritatingly grand, solemn, or self-important
Possessive - demanding someone’s total attention and love
Pusillanimous - showing a lack of courage or determination; timid
Quarrelsome - given to or characterized by quarreling
Quick-tempered - easily made angry
Resentful - feeling or expressing bitterness or indignation at having been treated unfairly
Rude - offensively impolite or ill-mannered*
Ruthless - having or showing no pity or compassion for others
Sarcastic - marked by or given to using irony in order to mock or convey contempt
Secretive - inclined to conceal feelings and intentions or not to disclose information
Selfish - lacking consideration for others; concerned chiefly with one’s own personal profit or pleasure
Self-centered - preoccupied with oneself and one’s affairs
Self-indulgent - characterized by doing or tending to do exactly what one wants, especially when this involves pleasure or idleness
Silly - having or showing a lack of common sense or judgment; absurd and foolish
Sly - having or showing a cunning and deceitful nature
Sneaky - furtive; sly
Stingy - unwilling to give or spend; ungenerous
Stubborn - having or showing dogged determination not to change one’s attitude or position on something, especially in spite of good arguments or reasons to do so
Stupid - having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense
Superficial - not having or showing any depth of character or understanding
Tacky - showing poor taste and quality
Tactless - having or showing a lack of adroitness and sensitivity in dealing with others or with difficult issues
Timid - showing a lack of courage or confidence; easily frightened
Touchy - oversensitive and irritable
Thoughtless - not showing consideration for the needs of other people
Truculent - eager or quick to argue or fight; aggressively defiant
Unkind - inconsiderate and harsh to others
Unpredictable - behaving in a way that is not easily predicted
Unreliable - not able to be relied upon
Untidy - not inclined to keep one’s possessions or appearance neat and in order
Untrustworthy - not able to be relied on as honest or truthful*
Vague - thinking or communicating in an unfocused or imprecise way
Vain - having or showing an excessively high opinion of one’s appearance, abilities, or worth
Vengeful - seeking to harm someone in return for a perceived injury
Vulgar - lacking sophistication or good taste; unrefined
Weak-willed - lacking the ability to resist influence or to restrain one’s own impulses; irresolute
* = Depends on who you are. There traits aren't an inherent part of how he'd act with 99% of people, but they do come very naturally when facing off against those he cannot stand or who he believes deserve it.
5 notes
·
View notes