Tumgik
joe20xx · 1 month
Text
"All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players. They have their exits and their entrances; And one man in his time plays many parts."- Shakespeare
Due to psychological stressors of our times, much of the presumed negatives about indulgent behaviors are more common without negative favours, while culture is split in how handle to such- as if the culture tribes’s supposed virtue where more important than the individual’s assessment (self-acceptance/actualization).
There some arguments, both in regards to market and state ultimatums, that diminish individual risk assessment that take a negative defense of such oligarchs and plutarchs over the trader principle of the transactions; this involves both parties not just one, as if people need to boxed into tribal groups instead of pursue their own happiness and interests.
0 notes
joe20xx · 2 months
Text
Limits of Subjectivity
Those that view reality, facts, and morality as subjective tend to have issue with either meaning anything other than perspective, opinion, and somehow “no not that”. If matters don’t have some objectivity, then there’s nothing that can’t be argued nor agreed to “voluntarily” (in the “postmodern” sense). Yet in establishing, that often puts limits of which many are unable to agreed, beyond minimal basis, despite the popular demand for “more”, “better”, “universal”, etc. interventions (to satiate a worry with minimal involvement).
0 notes
joe20xx · 2 months
Text
To oppose an idea without an idea isn’t merely antintellectual; it’s unintelligible. If one provides no substitute yet demands silence, they’re a tyrant; if they provide a subtitute that is lesser, it is more than the authoritarian, supremist idea that demands no persuasion being needed. Not engaging is a substitute to such coercion; if something is truly self-destructive, it will die and it should be so, instead of turned into to dividing point of ideolgues. Intervening on a deadened matter can unnecessarily cause the unwanted persistence of such, as an unintended consequence.
0 notes
joe20xx · 3 months
Text
Analogy
In a larger jungle one is freer, yet in all jungles someone will still be thinking about creating grouping zones (safety) rather than teaching life lessons (independence). A free monkey can still be intimidated, yet an independent one can find another banana tree and community of chimps. A safe monkey may not be aware of and even convince themselves to give up, when there’s another jungle that could be explored.
0 notes
joe20xx · 3 months
Text
There’s desire to look beyond the materialism of reality, while denying the material of existence, while seeking spiritualism, and attempt to grasp the spiritual contrary; all in attempt to both be free in manners similar to an idealized childhood and idealized adulthood, at times intersecting each and inducing conflict. Rather than reexamining any of the prior dualisms, as the learned experience is seen as beneficial despite it not leading to benefit in the subjective manner which is conflicted.
0 notes
joe20xx · 3 months
Text
When one admits something is stupid, they admit it’s not in their best sense of self-interest. Yet tend to use such as an excuse to deny self-interest, which is illogical. In parenting and other managerial governances, it is important to have reminders of such; not that impulse can’t lead to better decisions, yet because impulse is not the correct induction theory. Guessing is sometimes necessary, yet less likely things are not wise; though, circumstances can make better things less likely, as an understanding of such may yet not be clear to the consensus.
0 notes
joe20xx · 4 months
Text
Demisexual makes more sense, when sapio tends to refer to an intelligence and intelligence tends to fixate on planning everything with concerns of agency, and agency is seen as emotional outcry for the despot’s plans; and that a relationship needs a level of agency for respect rather than the abusive basis of arbitrary predetermined dominance vs submission based on group association rather than metrics of individuals indecent of the group. Yet even saying that, people worry enough to forgoe agency beyond themselves, whether as an individual or group to an authority and become accustomed to submitting to it increments of soft despotism that it ends up being considered “common sense”, instead of climbing the peaks of reason.
0 notes
joe20xx · 5 months
Text
One person views another assumes they don’t wish or do wish. The other often rationalizes the answer expected, would not always be truly honest yet may be perceived such; they may be even honored for such lack of development. “How virtuous” thine trauma, like that of Quasimodo. (“Those that can you believe absurdities can commit atrocities.”) Sacrfice is such a cultist mentality; as if berating oneself was worse than truly demonstrating greater worth than those so ignoble they demand nobility. (“Good is not a thing you are. It’s a thing you do.”)
0 notes
joe20xx · 6 months
Text
0 notes
joe20xx · 6 months
Text
How art the stars that shine upon the moon/When moonlight lit upon you so soon/Silken threads saturate the solstice soon/And, hallowed heathers hark Hecate/Spin Moon Magic spun thine plate/Hourglass evenings initiate/Wed the wolve and widow/Begot the Pyre evermore/in the leafy meadow/Rising Fenix, soar.
1 note · View note
joe20xx · 7 months
Text
Faith in “someone else”, whether it be policy makers, businessmen, or mystic entities, is an escapism, and a scapegoat when they “fail” (to entitle subjective favoritism). Others may solve things, but they may not as well; if you value something, do it, defend it, and don’t let it slide unless it truly wasn’t valuable.
0 notes
joe20xx · 7 months
Text
A difference between an adult and robot, is robots don’t mince words. Yet many people who use bots, do mince the words through the human difficulties in communication that make people believe such poetic dancing is something more than evasive, only in the context that one leads to skiddish approaches of meaningful endeavors and the other being scammed. By itself, AI is rather harmless; yet AI will not be by itself, it will have trolls like with case of bing chat and other algorithms who will unintentionally teach stupidity as AI doesn’t know better (like children).
2 notes · View notes
joe20xx · 7 months
Text
The ghostly gasp/ Hung over shadows/ melancholy in the morrows/ bellows of rasping/Echoes of Death/ A Living Breath/ Eternity towards nightshade/veiling mid grade/ mediocrity within the city/none different prairie/nun deferent the grasslands/never the More been pity/dawning the hands of Mary.
0 notes
joe20xx · 7 months
Text
With one mask one wants change, and one face they demand to keep the insanity of existing mysticisms knowing how absurd both are. In order to have an issue to keep solving, keep worrying, some people will consistently cause “drama”, even if it is not intentionally as absurd; however ignoring other’s do so, the absurdism of doing so exasperated the issue, and can inverse such power fantasies back-and-forth causing more collateral damage, enveloping more people and furthering the divide with the moral subjectivism of each “tribe”.
0 notes
joe20xx · 7 months
Text
0 notes
joe20xx · 7 months
Text
At full reveal, people perceive themself as vicious, imagining that others aren’t as wel, if not worse. When show is over and masks removed, few are truly pristine. Yet despite the muck, we shine through; as with time, the corrosion chips away, as it didn’t matter yet it mattered for the performance- for the emotional, the sentimentally, for the situational, and subjective, personal nature. We may be remind that we are dust in the wind, a speck in the cosmos; yet to your sense of Being, we are Gods, seemingly mighty yet flawed. (Yet in the mess of things, grand scheme, etc. perhaps we are “perfect” in that we learn, even when we wish not and teach even if by accident; for we would love a God that does everything, yet that have nothing to do. We create meaning; we may learn meaning, yet we can warp Meaning as well.. Much like a parent, one has to move on, though it may be scary).
0 notes
joe20xx · 8 months
Text
One rock, two rock, three rock… one rock, two rock, three rock.. repeat. Eventually there would be a standard for the rock, yet still they add rocks, for each division attempted to be forced comply instead of actually seek true harmony through voluntary associations, which can also be voluntarily disassociated. Yet in such, the fear of relativism emerges recycling subjection, back to One Rock until the next Emergence of Ideas arises attempting to justify the past fears rather than recognize the hastefulness of such slippery slopes.
1 note · View note