Tumgik
#perspectivism
thorraborinn · 7 months
Text
In this connection the sayings that the elks and the bears are the pigs and oxen of the ruler of the wood become important and testify to the close connection felt between the ruler of the wood and the wild game.
Anna Birgitta Rooth, "The Conception of 'Rulers' in the South of Sweden," p. 122 (discussing skogsrå)
The spirit animal masters who own and care for these animals (which appear as peccaries to the Runa in their waking lives) see them as their domestic pigs.
Eduardo Kohn, How Forests Think, p. 141
50 notes · View notes
ciquery · 8 months
Text
Casual abuse or misdiagnosis of troubling psychosocial phenomena prevent us from healing and developing agency for our own lives.
While no one needs to gatekeep these technical terms, it could be helpful to reflect with an open mind and consult with a trusted professional.
The overarching message? Stay grounded and curious, then observe the grey as much as possible before applying rigid labels.
14 notes · View notes
Text
Ultimately, nobody can get more out of things, including books, than he already knows. For what one lacks access to from experience one will have no ear.
Friedrich Nietzsche, Ecce Homo: Why I Write Such Good Books.
23 notes · View notes
tmarshconnors · 10 months
Text
“Sometimes people don't want to hear the truth because they don't want their illusions destroyed.”
Tumblr media
Friedrich Nietzsche was a German philosopher, prose poet, and cultural critic.
Born: 15 October 1844, Röcken, Lützen, Germany
Died: 25 August 1900, Weimar, Germany
2 notes · View notes
innabesedina · 2 years
Link
5 notes · View notes
comradewisdom · 24 days
Text
It is precisely facts that do not exist, only interpretations.
Nietzsche
0 notes
Text
Nurture Yourself - with Divine Oneness
Opportunity                      ©photography by Isadora DeLaVega Artwork is personal. Whether you view a painting by the great masters in a museum or a painting in a gallery or art show, you feel a personal connection to it as you look at it. My husband and I decided a very long time ago to refrain from purchasing gifts for any occasion. Instead, we felt that a piece of Art would be much more…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
omegaphilosophia · 3 months
Text
Theories of the Philosophy of Opinion
The philosophy of opinion explores the nature, formation, and validity of opinions. It delves into questions regarding the reliability of opinions, the role of perception and bias in shaping them, and their relationship to knowledge and truth. Philosophers examine how opinions are influenced by various factors such as culture, upbringing, education, and personal experiences. Additionally, they analyze the ethical implications of holding and expressing opinions, especially in contexts where they may impact others or societal norms.
Some theories in the philosophy of opinion include:
Relativism: This theory suggests that opinions are subjective and context-dependent, meaning that what is true or valid for one person or culture may not be true for another.
Subjectivism: Subjectivism holds that opinions are based solely on individual preferences, emotions, or beliefs, with no objective truth or validity outside of personal experience.
Epistemic Justification: This theory focuses on the criteria for justifying opinions, such as evidence, reasoning, and coherence with other beliefs. It explores questions of whether opinions can be justified and what constitutes a reasonable basis for holding them.
Perspectivism: Perspectivism acknowledges that opinions are shaped by one's perspective or standpoint, influenced by factors like social identity, ideology, and personal interests. It emphasizes the importance of understanding diverse perspectives to gain a more comprehensive view of reality.
Pragmatism: Pragmatism emphasizes the practical consequences of holding opinions, focusing on their usefulness rather than their truth or validity. It suggests that the value of an opinion lies in its effectiveness in guiding action or achieving desired outcomes.
Hermeneutics: Hermeneutic approaches to opinion focus on the interpretation and understanding of texts, symbols, and cultural artifacts. They explore how opinions are constructed and communicated through language and symbols, emphasizing the role of interpretation in shaping meaning.
Social Constructivism: Social constructivism posits that opinions are socially constructed through interactions with others and within specific social and cultural contexts. It examines how societal norms, power dynamics, and collective beliefs influence the formation and validation of opinions.
These theories provide different perspectives on the nature of opinion and contribute to ongoing debates in philosophy regarding the nature of knowledge, truth, and human understanding.
1 note · View note
blueheartbooks · 3 months
Text
"Exploring the Philosophical Depths: Friedrich Nietzsche's 'Beyond Good and Evil'"
Tumblr media
Friedrich Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil" is a philosophical tour de force that challenges conventional morality and calls into question the very foundations of Western thought. Published in 1886, this seminal work presents a radical critique of traditional ethics, religion, and metaphysics, advocating for a reevaluation of values based on individual will and self-overcoming.
At its core, "Beyond Good and Evil" is a relentless interrogation of morality and its origins. Nietzsche famously declares that "God is dead," signaling the collapse of traditional religious beliefs and the need for a new ethical framework rooted in human experience and perspective. Throughout the text, he dismantles the dichotomy between good and evil, arguing that moral judgments are subjective and contingent upon individual interpretation.
Nietzsche's prose is both incisive and provocative, filled with aphoristic insights and paradoxical statements that challenge readers to think deeply about the nature of existence. He explores a wide range of topics, from the nature of truth and knowledge to the psychology of power and domination. Through his critique of traditional values, Nietzsche seeks to liberate individuals from the constraints of herd mentality and encourage them to embrace their own unique potential.
Central to Nietzsche's philosophy is the concept of the "will to power," which he defines as the driving force behind all human behavior. He argues that individuals must strive to overcome societal norms and constraints in order to achieve self-realization and become what he calls "übermensch" or "overman." This idea of transcending conventional morality and embracing one's own instincts and desires is central to Nietzsche's vision of a liberated and creative humanity.
Throughout "Beyond Good and Evil," Nietzsche challenges readers to confront uncomfortable truths about human nature and the nature of reality itself. He exposes the hypocrisy of moral absolutism and calls for a more nuanced understanding of ethics based on individual autonomy and self-expression. While his ideas may be controversial and unsettling, they have profoundly influenced modern philosophy and continue to provoke debate and discussion to this day.
In conclusion, "Beyond Good and Evil" stands as a testament to Nietzsche's intellectual daring and visionary insight. With its bold critique of traditional morality and its call for a new era of individualism and self-assertion, the book remains a powerful and relevant work that challenges readers to question their most deeply held beliefs and assumptions about the world.
Friedrich Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil" is available in Amazon in paperback 12.99$ and hardcover 19.99$ editions.
Number of pages: 227
Language: English
Rating: 10/10                                           
Link of the book!
Review By: King's Cat
0 notes
blueheartbookclub · 3 months
Text
"Exploring the Philosophical Depths: Friedrich Nietzsche's 'Beyond Good and Evil'"
Tumblr media
Friedrich Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil" is a philosophical tour de force that challenges conventional morality and calls into question the very foundations of Western thought. Published in 1886, this seminal work presents a radical critique of traditional ethics, religion, and metaphysics, advocating for a reevaluation of values based on individual will and self-overcoming.
At its core, "Beyond Good and Evil" is a relentless interrogation of morality and its origins. Nietzsche famously declares that "God is dead," signaling the collapse of traditional religious beliefs and the need for a new ethical framework rooted in human experience and perspective. Throughout the text, he dismantles the dichotomy between good and evil, arguing that moral judgments are subjective and contingent upon individual interpretation.
Nietzsche's prose is both incisive and provocative, filled with aphoristic insights and paradoxical statements that challenge readers to think deeply about the nature of existence. He explores a wide range of topics, from the nature of truth and knowledge to the psychology of power and domination. Through his critique of traditional values, Nietzsche seeks to liberate individuals from the constraints of herd mentality and encourage them to embrace their own unique potential.
Central to Nietzsche's philosophy is the concept of the "will to power," which he defines as the driving force behind all human behavior. He argues that individuals must strive to overcome societal norms and constraints in order to achieve self-realization and become what he calls "übermensch" or "overman." This idea of transcending conventional morality and embracing one's own instincts and desires is central to Nietzsche's vision of a liberated and creative humanity.
Throughout "Beyond Good and Evil," Nietzsche challenges readers to confront uncomfortable truths about human nature and the nature of reality itself. He exposes the hypocrisy of moral absolutism and calls for a more nuanced understanding of ethics based on individual autonomy and self-expression. While his ideas may be controversial and unsettling, they have profoundly influenced modern philosophy and continue to provoke debate and discussion to this day.
In conclusion, "Beyond Good and Evil" stands as a testament to Nietzsche's intellectual daring and visionary insight. With its bold critique of traditional morality and its call for a new era of individualism and self-assertion, the book remains a powerful and relevant work that challenges readers to question their most deeply held beliefs and assumptions about the world.
Friedrich Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil" is available in Amazon in paperback 12.99$ and hardcover 19.99$ editions.
Number of pages: 227
Language: English
Rating: 10/10                                           
Link of the book!
Review By: King's Cat
1 note · View note
thorraborinn · 8 months
Text
I do not particularly like the notion of energy (as a moniker for “invisible effica­cious substance”), which has been long and widely used to translate "primitive” notions, in Amazonia and elsewhere. I do not like it because it does no more than provide difficult native concepts with an equally mysterious gloss. It would not do to render, say, “spirit” or “mana” as “energy” for the simple reason that "energy” already means “mana” for the anthropologist who uses this word. Energy is a mana-concept, or rather the mana-concept of our physicaily-minded modern tradition: the old “matter/spirit” opposition gave way to “matter/energy,” with “energy” doing pretty much the same job as the old “spirit.” Mauss and Hubert, however, in their well-known essay on magic (1950), did use the notion of energy in a very interesting, and I believe rarely noticed, sense: they say that mana is analogous to our notion of potential energy. Potential en­ergy, in the dictionary I have in my computer (American Heritage Dictionary), is defined as “the energy of a particle or system of particles derived from position, or condition, rather than motion. A raised weight, coiled spring, or charged battery has potential energy” (emphasis mine). Mauss and Hubert say in their essay that the concept of mana is nothing but the idea of the differences of potential between things, the idea that different categories of things and persons are, precisely, different. (That is how Mauss managed to extract energy from primitive classifications; a remarkable feat.) Suppose, then, that the spirit as “energy” or “life" (vital energy) of Gray’s definition could be understood in this sense of potential, that is, positional and differential energy. This would be consistent with Gray's emphasis on spirit as "potentiality” (although being quite different from Aristotelian dunamis). But if this is the case, whence came the difference of potential? From the only source of difference in this ontology, I would argue—from the perspectival and dif­ferential body. Potential or spiritual energy would itself be derived from formal energy, energy which is "contained” in bodily form, due to the difference in “position or condition”—in affect—of each type of body relative to other bodily forms. Aristotle’s scheme, therefore, is not entirely adequate, even when inverted, to account for Amerindian notions of body and soul. The notion of poten­tiality or power—which plays such an important role in Amerindian doctrines of metamorphosis—cannot be defined here independently of the notions of difference and form. “Essence,” spiritual essence, is a function of “appearance," of bodily form.
-- Eduardo Vivieros de Castro, "Supernature: Under the Gaze of the Other" in The Relative Native: Essays on Indigenous Conceptual Worlds
33 notes · View notes
ciquery · 9 months
Text
I’m reflecting hard on the human I want to become, and the meaningful mistakes that will get me there.
New wind, refreshed perspectives, and a renewed practice. Attempt #8823 let’s gooooo
3 notes · View notes
Text
The more sand that has escaped from the hourglass of our life, the clearer we should see through it.
Jean-Paul Sartre, Source Unlisted.
7 notes · View notes
joe20xx · 7 months
Text
With one mask one wants change, and one face they demand to keep the insanity of existing mysticisms knowing how absurd both are. In order to have an issue to keep solving, keep worrying, some people will consistently cause “drama”, even if it is not intentionally as absurd; however ignoring other’s do so, the absurdism of doing so exasperated the issue, and can inverse such power fantasies back-and-forth causing more collateral damage, enveloping more people and furthering the divide with the moral subjectivism of each “tribe”.
0 notes
m-c-easton · 10 months
Text
Depicting Abuse in Fiction
This week I read an essay by Christopher Noël titled “Keeping Open the Wounds of Possibility: The Marvelous, the Uncanny, and the Fantastic in Fiction.” It was an approachable, hands-on review of ideas from the Russian Formalists (especially defamiliarization) and Wolfgang Iser (especially the reader and author co-creating the text). But I liked it most for helping me clarify some of my…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
1 note · View note
youbettertpwk · 1 year
Text
does anyone know if Ortega and Gasset were like, a thing? /gen
1 note · View note