9 January 2021
9 January 2021.
3:54 PM.
So, Iāve written about writing fiction on this blog before, and this much has become clear to me: It seems that I enjoy writing about fictional worlds, rather than writing stories within those fictional worlds.
So, in this blog post, Iām going to write about a fictional world that Iāve been creating, and perhaps someday Iāll publish a novel or something of a story within this fictional world.
But, until then, Iām just gonna write about it. But why am I writing this on my blog? Why am I publishing this for all the world to see?
Because, well, I have this weird mental thing, which I canāt seem to figure out, nor seem to change... and that weird mental thing is this notion that, if something isnāt immediate relevant, I canāt really find the motivation to work on it.
In other words, I need to work in real-time in order to feel like my work is meaningful and thus be motivated to actually work on my work work work work work work... shoutout to Rihanna and Drake.
So, yeah. Iāve found that if I just publish my work (almost immediately or instantaneously; and even actually immediately and instantaneously, when I stream on Instagram Live or YouTube Live or Twitch TV, etcetera), then I have much more motivation to actually continue working.
Whereas, when I donāt publish my work (almost) immediately, I start to feel... disconnected, irrelevant, lonely in the work.
I guess I just like sharing stuff. I want my work to be an ongoing conversation, not something I slave away at by myself for days upon days upon days and then release to the world.
My friend Zane recommended that I write Flash Fiction. No, thatās not the right name for it. What is it called? Itās this kind of fiction where, every few days or every week or whatever, the author releases a new chapter of the story. Well, I donāt know if it has a name, but itās a good idea. I might try that in the near future. If I forget, please remind me.
Ź ā¢į“„ā¢Ź
It is now 4:07 PM. Iām feeling a little antsy, so Iām going to do some exercise ā yoga, weight-lifting, etcetera ā to release some energy. BRB.
4:17 PM. Random thought just occurred to me. Another reason I like publishing my writing immediately is because I like talking to people. When I write and publish in real-time... itās as if Iām talking to you, the reader.
Only losers go to school.
I taught myself how to move.
Iām not the type to count on you.
Because stupidās next to "I love you".
So what can you show me,
that my heart don't know already?
'Cause we make our own sense,
and you're qualified to me.
ā Lyrics from Losers by The Weeknd featuring Labrinth
5:01 PM.
A beautiful and hilarious quote by Lucky Yates. He tweeted it on the day of the Capitol Attacks in Washington DC.
I should post a vlog on YouTube about my experience with marijuana. The flower has played an interesting role in my life thus far.
5:12 PM.
Cracks create beauty,
and beauty is broken.
5:56 PM.
Oh, yeah, I was gonna write about my fictional universe. Iām making some coffee right now. Itās a little late for coffee... but today feels like a coffee kind of night.
So, anyways, the universe Iām creating is called Universe 1830. First, Iāll explain what exactly this universe is, then Iāll explain why Iām creating this fictional universe.
So, what is Universe 1830?
Well, like I said, itās, um, a fictional universe. Just like any other universe, it has stories, locations, characters, history, culture, technology, etcetera. You can think of Universe 1830 as a sub-universe of the larger Universe (the Absolutely Infinite Universe). (Or maybe the Universe of all Universes, or something.)
The numbers make it interesting because then you can imagine infinite universes numerically. For example, Universe 1, Universe 2, Universe 3, Universe 40, Universe 50, Universe 60, Universe 700, Universe 800, Universe 900, Universe 1000000 Universe 2000000, Universe 3000000, Universe 4000000000, Universe 5000000000, Universe 6000000000, Universe 7000000000000... I think you get the idea. INFINITE Universes.
And then Universe 1830 is just right there in between Universe 1831 and Universe 1829. (Impressively, pretty close to Universe 1, actually.) (Just kidding, the numbers are arbitrary, simply for labeling purposes.) (Maybe someday Iāll play around with these numbers.)
So, yeah, Universe 1830 is a sub-universe within the larger literally completely infinite Universe.
Universe 1830 has its own canon. And, for now at least, this canon can only be written by me, this individual, Juvoci. Perhaps, in the future, Iāll permit other writers to write within the 1830 Universe. But, for now, I will preserve that right for me alone, for the sake of keeping 1830 a contained project.
Of course, anyone can write fan fiction for Universe 1830, if anyone is so inclined. All such writing will only be part of the ā1830 Fan-Fiction Universeā unless I adopt it into the Official Canon.
Get it? Got it? Cool. Moving forward.
Why am I creating this fictional universe?
Thereās a few reasons.
1 ā Writing fiction is a great way to explore and discuss real world issues. By using fictional locations, places, names, characters, histories, etcetera... I can explore real world issues in a different context and without name-dropping. (But that isnāt to say that I wonāt name drop. š)
2 ā I love writing fiction. Contemporary Fiction, Sci-Fi & Fantasy Fiction, Historical Fiction... itās all good fun to me! I just love writing, language, ideas, worlds, universes... I just love it.
3 ā I canāt think of any more reasons.
6:19 PM.
So, yeah, I guess thatās what and why. Did I miss anything?
Listening to music by Victor Norman right now. Itās like dark and minimal Drum and Bass... or something. Right up my ally, whatever it is. Good stuff.
Oh, another reason I want to create a fictional universe is because this world we live in now is messed up in so many ways. I feel like we, as a global society, need to start telling ourselves a different story about what this world is. We need a new mythology. So Iām hoping that potentially by creating this fiction universe called 1830, we can meld and blend our real-world mythology with this fictional mythology and hence create a new story and context for ourselves and thus create a better Earth.
Like, for example, different ārealmsā or āplanetsā in Universe 1830 worship certain pantheons of gods; and we here as humans on Earth can use these gods as symbols and heroes and idols and signposts. These gods can give us motivation and direction.
And later, in this blog, Iāll talk about some of the gods.
But, remember, Iām literally going to be building this universe in real-time, while blogging on the internet... so not everything I write is immediately canon. I might make edits later.
That being said, I am going to create a wikipedia (either on this website or on Fandom or both) which keeps track of the characters, locations, stories, yada yada. So this blog will sort of act as a āsketchbookā for Universe 1830, and the wikipedia will act as a sort of ālogbookā for Universe 1830. Iāll elaborate on this further, in the future.
6:32 PM.
š This is my favorite heart emoji, by the way. Although, I wish there was a pink one. There is a pink one, but it has some shit on it or something.
7:04 PM.
So, Ora is perhaps the first character I should talk about in Universe 1830, because Ora was the first character I ever created for Universe 1830.
So, who is Ora? Well, Ora is... alot of things, lol. I created him in 2015... so heās been developed for awhile.
But, yes, Ora is a male, a man, a he. I suppose, that is the first thing you have learned about Ora.
Now, does this mean that Ora has a penis? I donāt know, maybe. At certain points in Oraās existence, he is a male human... so I suppose that, yes, Ora, at certain points, has a penis.
The only reason I mention that last bit is because of the interesting things happening in pop culture regarding the difference between sex and gender. Honestly, the debate is beyond me. I say, ābe whoever you wanna beā and āIāll call you whatever you wanna be calledā. So, yeah, I guess that, when I say āOra is a maleā, Iām basically just saying that he was born with a penis, and likely still has one (assuming heās in human form). (āHuman form?ā youāre asking. Yes. Ora has more than one form. Iāll cover this later.)
But, also, I suppose that, when I say āOra is a maleā, Iām also saying that his masculine energy is stronger than his feminine energy. Now, what exactly the difference is between masculine energy and feminine energy is... complicated, and not something I even completely understand. Itās more of a... feeling. Stuff just feels masculine or feminine to me. Itās hard to explain. Itās almost... an emotion. Maybe Iāll dive deeper into this topic another time.
But, letās get back to Ora. Who is Ora?
7:15 PM.
Like I said before, Ora has multiple forms. So it can get a bit complicated when we talk about what or who Ora is. But Iāll begin from a place of simplicity; when Ora was a human.
(I suppose I should write all of the lore in past tense? As if all the events of Universe 1830 occurred back in the day? Perhaps? Not sure yet.)
Ora was a human in the Realm of Zunora (a realm which has many other names) on Planet Zunora (a planet which has many other names).
Who is Zunora? Zunora is a god / goddess. (Zunora is known to appear in both male and female forms, so Iāll henceforth refer to Zunora as he, she, and they. That being said, Zunora appears most often in her feminine form... so Iāll usually refer to Zunora as female. She tends to reserve her masculine forms for when she needs to be dominating. Deeper voice, bigger frame, etcetera. Classic biological differences.)
(Fuck, Iām writing in present tense now. Whatever, screw worrying about tenses. š)
For the sake of convenience, Iāll simply refer to Zunora as a āgodā. Honestly, in my mind, āgodā can apply to male and female gods. Even distinguishing goddess from god is kind of insulting. Theyāre all just gods, theyāre all just actors, theyāre all just princes, etcetera...
So, yeah, Zunora is a God. Zunora is a God of Light. Her colors are yellow (or gold), black, and white. Zunora is a God of Inspiration, Creativity, Radiance, Spark, Lightning, Electricity...
Indeed, Zunora is a God inspired by the Sun. So any (or at least most) of the Sunās characteristics, are characteristics of Zunora. The name Zunora comes from the English translation of Sun Aura. (I will explain the history of language in the Realm of Zunora at another time, and at that time I will explain exactly what I mean by āEnglish translationā. But, in short, itās an effort to maintain the ārealismā or at least ārealistic feelingā of the āfictionalā universe.)
That being said, when Zunora was created, she was created to be the aura of the Sun, and not the Sun itself. In other words, Zunora is symbolic of the light surrounding the Sun... but not the literal Sun itself.
Now, you may have noticed that āOraā and āZunoraā are quite similar in that they both have āoraā in them. Look at you, Einstein! Atta-boy! Ehem. Sorry.
But, yes, Ora is derived from Zunora. (Or, perhaps, Zunora is derived from Ora? Queue the suspenseful music!) Just exactly why Ora is named after Zunora is something Iāll probably cover in a story about Ora. (A story which Iāve already finished some percentage of and I hope to publish someday.)
8:21 PM.
Sorry, got distracted by the news. Watching Reuters videos about the Capitol Attack on January 6. Reuters is a great news source. They are more diverse, (relatively) less biased, and less anxiety-inducing, than other news sources. I highly recommend checking out their videos at reuters.com/video.
Itās amazing how many military factions there are (and have been). The FBI, the Maryland National Guard, the Capitol Police, Antifa, the US Coast Guard, the Red Army, the People's Liberation Army, the Korean People's Army... I mean the list goes on and on and on...
As Iāve gotten older, Iāve become more and more understanding of why militaries exist. Peeps be fucking shit up, and sometimes we need an elite force of trained soldiers to stop the fuck-uppery. That being said, I still think that, at the end of the day, violence isnāt the answer. I still hope and dream for a world without violence. And I think we can achieve it.
Iām a believer! I couldnāt leave her, if I tried!
Then I got the idea: 1830 will be a non-violent military force. We use our minds to inspire change, not physical force. Sounds kinda corny, right? Whatever.
Oh, by the way, 1830 is different from Universe 1830. 1830 is a real-world community, while Universe 1830 is a fictional universe. Hm... this could get confusing. Maybe I should give Universe 1830 a second and more practical name. How about... Fable Union? Sounds good. Universe 1830 is now also called Fable Union. Great.
So, yeah, 1830 is a religion, a non-violent military force, and a... newspaper?! Surprise!
Yes, 1830 is also a media outlet, a digital magazine (and perhaps someday physical), a newspaper.
Sigh... 1830 is alot of things. Lots of potential. But only Time will tell what it truly becomes.
Stop looking at me like that. Yes, I am aware that Iām a little crazy. (Just kidding, Iām 100% sane. Just kidding, Iām not. Just kidding, I am.) (I am.) (Seriously.) (Okay, not that seriously... but... seriously enough.) (Wtf am I talking about?)
8:36 PM. Jeez. Iāve spent like the entire day writing. Cool.
But, yeah, 1830 is a platform for intellectual and political conversation.
Letās get back to talking about Ora.
8:48 PM.
Maybe I should just continue writing the fictional stories about these characters, instead of explaining it all here, because I feel like... if I keep writing about them in this format, Iāll end up just spoiling the stories... and thatās no fun, right?
But everytime I try writing the fictional stories, I lose motivation, as I mentioned in another recent blog post. Hm...
Fuck it. Letās talk about something else. I need to think more about how I wanna approach Universe 1830. Sorry for the false alarm! Oops, I mean Fable Union (also known as Universe 1830).
Letās talk about Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Cryptocurrency in general.
Firstly, I wanna post a screenshot. In the Economics Explained Discord (great YouTube channel, highly recommend it), I simply asked this question: Thoughts on Bitcoin (or Cryptocurrency in general)? And I received some pretty interesting responses. Here is one of the most interesting responses I received:
Donāt stare at money too long, itās Medusa!
ā Kanye West
Sorry, just thought of that for some reason. Itās true, though. Yes, what a wise intuition that was! Before we begin talking about cryptocurrency, which is money of course... let us acknowledge that we must not over-indulge in money! Fair warning.
But, yes, letās go over this interesting response regarding Cryptocurrency.
This Discord user (whom I wonāt name, for the sake of privacy... but if you read this, and want me to credit you, let me know), begins by saying a bunch of stuff about oil and Ethereum and petrodollars, but I donāt quite understand what heās (Iām guessing itās a dude, because most people on Discord are probably dudes, but I donāt really know for sure) trying to say here. Please let me know if you understand. But, moving on...
Something he says, which is super interesting to me, which is why I exclamation-point-emojied it, is āThe whole idea that supply cannot be changed is just false.ā And, at first, when he said this, I was like: āWait, whoa, what? Isnāt one of the major points of Bitcoin that it has a limited and thus scarce supply? But this statement by this anonymous Discord user completely contradicts that.
But then I thought about it... and, wait a second, I think it might be true! What if a government, slowly but surely, built itself around Bitcoin, such that it held Bitcoin as its central currency, and then could export subsidies and import taxes, as it pleased, through Bitcoin, in order to control the supply and demand of Bitcoin.
In other words, control of Bitcoinās availability, through subsidies and taxes, is essentially synonymous with control of Bitcoinās supply.
In other words, being able to control Bitcoinās value, by controlling its availability, is essentially the same as controlling its supply.
See what Iām saying? Iām honestly not sure if Iām making myself clear, or making any sense. It makes sense to me, anyway.
So, in other words, yes, there will (supposedly) only ever be 21,000,000 Bitcoins in existence. But manipulation of Bitcoinās value is about the same as manipulation of Bitcoinās supply.
HOWEVER, if Bitcoin becomes the GLOBAL RESERVE CURRENCY for ALL countries... then it should be more stable, because then there will be competition, and not a monopoly, over the Bitcoinās income and outcome, and thus value.
This is actually the best result, in my opinion; that Bitcoin becomes the Official Global Reserve Currency. The OGRC...? š Official Global Reserve Exchange... or OGRE. š¹ Lmao.
9:40 PM.
If Bitcoin became the worldās official reserve currency... that would be dope. Why? Because it actually does, numerically-speaking, have a static supply. This means that governments, corporations, individuals, nobody can create Bitcoins out of thin air (unlike dollars *cough*).
Thatās why Bitcoin is such a great reserve currency. And other currencies, like the US dollar, the Chinese yen, the Russian ruble, and Ethereum (ETH), can be backed by the value of Bitcoin.
Just as a side note, I wanna acknowledge how awesome of a name Bitcoin is. Hats off to whoever came up with it. I mean, it is kind of an obvious choice, no doubt. But itās so beautiful in its obviousness and simplicity. Itās a great name. There are some other cryptocurrencies with great names too, though. Tether, for example, is a great cryptocurrency name. (Although, Iām not sure whether or not Tether is as good an investment as it is a name...)
Returning to the anonymous Discord userās posting, Iām gonna define a few terms he mentions, for you and for myself.
petrodollar : In America, the petrodollar is any US dollar paid to oil-exporting countries in exchange for oil. The dollar is the preeminent global currency. As a result, most international transactions, including oil, are priced in dollars. Oil-exporting nations receive dollars for their exports, not their own currency.
blockchain : A system in which a record of transactions, made in bitcoin or another cryptocurrency, are maintained across several computers that are linked in a peer-to-peer network.
smart contract : A computer program or a transaction protocol which is intended to automatically execute, control, or document legally, relevant events and actions according to the terms of a contract or an agreement. A self-executing contract, being directly written into lines of code. This code exists across a distributed, decentralized blockchain network.
I was going define unspent transaction outputs (UTXO) and account-based chains... but it turns out that theyāre just super technical terms that arenāt super relevant to the average consumer... so Iāll just skip over those. You can research them on your own, if youāre interested.
11:21 PM.
Got distracted again. Starting to get pretty tired.
The Discord user says that Ethereum has a higher throughput than Bitcoin. This means that transactions can happen faster on Ethereum (I think, but please correct me if Iām wrong). Iāve heard that Ethereum might end up being a currency which is used more often, but uses Bitcoin as its reserve currency.
10 January 2021.
1:37 AM.
Yeah, Iām pretty tired now.
I just played some Magic the Gathering (MTG) for the first time in months. I actually streamed it on Twitch. It was quite fun, honestly. I might continue. I really love that game. Itās a great game.
I used to be a pretty competitive Magic player. For a brief time in 2019, I was ranked in the Top 400 players worldwide on Magic Arena.
5:44 AM.
I feel pretty distracted, in life, generally-speaking. Modern life demands my attention in too many directions at once. Iām glad to be moving to Oregon soon, into the wilderness, for awhile.
Focus is so important.
āThere must be a better life...ā he says, āsomewhere... beyond.ā
6:17 AM.
Part of me honestly thinks that the whole fictional universe thing is kind of dumb. But I think I might just be over-thinking it. I think I think? Yes.
But seriously, I feel like it could be dumb. But then part of me loves it, and wants to keep building it. Iām not sure how to feel about it.
Is there a way for me to continue working on it without feeling like itās kinda dumb? Or is it just actually kind of dumb?
No, I donāt think itās just dumb. I think I just havenāt put enough effort into it to make it seem like something thatās actually cool. Maybe it will just take more work.
Bear with me. Iāll figure it out. Someday.
Loading . . .
0 notes
9 January 2021
This blog can be read in its entirety on JUVOCI.com.
9 January 2021.
11:03 AM.
Okay, so in the last blog post, for 8 January 2021, I left alot of cliff-hangers.
Firstly, I didnāt quite finish the Thought Leader idea.
Secondly, I didnāt quite finish the Philosophy is Dumb and What is Philosophy ideas.
But before we get into either of those, Iām going to go on another tangent (as I do), because I just commented on someoneās Reddit post, and it seems relevant, so I want to post my response here. Iāll post the screenshots below.
This was the Reddit post. It was posted in the CircleJerk sub-Reddit. Obviously, itās a joke. A sarcastic joke. But I took this sarcastic joke as an opportunity to express a real solution to some of our problems. Here it is:
Stop taking EXTREME and ABSOLUTE positions on COMPLEX topics.
āAll Cops Are Bastardsā? Obviously, this is not true. There are many police officers out there who simply want to use their elevated power to protect their communities from agents of chaos who wish harm upon innocent people. These cops do indeed exist.
Not all cops are bastards. Some of them? Yes. Most of them? Maybe, I donāt know. All of them? Certainly not.
Taking extreme and absolute positions on complex topics is a recipe for disaster. Itās a childish and immature and lazy way to approach the world. We can do better than this.
And I just want to mention, because I can see the trolls licking their lips. Yes, the question was a sarcastic joke, and my answer was a serious statement. I am fully aware. š¤”
11:29 AM.
Okay, now, letās get back to the Thought Leader stuff, because thatās important.
The importance of Thought Leaders, and what it takes to be one.
Letās define Thought Leader again, but in a different way this time. A Thought Leader could be compared to an āInfluencerā. When Serena Williams or LeBron James or Coryn Rivera or Steph Curry or Lindsey Vonn or Michael Phelps endorse a brand such as Nike or Adidas or Puma or whatever... these brands gain an elevated reputation. āLeBron James wears Nike sneakers? Damn! Nike must make good sneakers!ā And so Nike sales increase.
Jordan Peterson, for better or worse (Iām still undecided about him, though I do think that heās genuinely a good guy and has a good heart, despite his viewpoints), is a Thought Leader. When Jordan Peterson says Marxism is on the rise, this is dangerous, we need to take this seriously and rebel against it... literally thousands of people will begin distributing his message online and IRL (in real life). Jordan Peterson quite literally has a microphone which broadcasts directly into thousands of peopleās ears. (Well, not literally literally, but you get my point.) This is, in some sense, the definition of a Thought Leader.
In some sense, Iām already a Thought Leader. Many of the ideas I express are unusual, esoteric, not mainstream. But my reach isnāt very big, so Iām not leading many people.
11:45 AM.
So now that weāve defined Thought Leader (again), letās discuss why I want to be a Thought Leader (or at least grow as a Thought Leader), and what train of thought I actually want to lead.
In the last blog post, I mentioned Peace and Love. This is foundational. This is where it begins. If we donāt exercise Peace and Love, we cannot even really engage in conversation. The only reason I can honestly and freely engage in conversation with you is because we are at peace. If we were at war, this would not be possible.
Now, of course, just like everything else, Peace is a spectrum. At the high end of the Peace Spectrum, even arguments cease to exist. Individual beings simply express themselves and everyone who is listening simply listens. In such a circumstance, this being is expressing their truth, and everyone is listening with open minds, open hearts, without judgment. This is sort of... an idealistic scenario.
But this āidealistic scenarioā isnāt necessarily what we need right now, because humanity does indeed have some complex problems which need solving, and simply opening our hearts to everyoneās subjective truth isnāt necessarily going to solve those problems. Instead, we must share our ideas, experiment with those ideas, find the best ideas, and act on them. In other words, we must share our ideas and then debate those ideas, in order to find the best idea.
Problems arise when ego interferes. People become attached to their ideas. They want credit. They want to be the savior of the world. People become so attached to their ideas that they ignore better ideas. This is why I like the Philosophy of Infinity and the practice of Infinite Openmindedness.
Recognize that your pet idea is just one idea in a sea of infinite ideas, and it isnāt necessarily the best idea. Recognize that you might be wrong. Recognize that other people have lived complex lives, likely (more or less) as complex as yours; and other people are capable of intelligence, just like you; and other people are smart, sometimes smarter than you. Recognize that a Competitive and Free Market of Ideas will create an environment where the best ideas rise to the top, breeding better ideas. If we can all enter the Chamber of Debate, and leave our egos at the door, we will discover the greatest truths by merging our individual minds into a smarter collective mind.
So, to summarize, Absolute Peace is the eventual goal, but Peaceful Debate is whatās needed now.
Peaceful Debate means that we respect each otherās life experiences, we respect each otherās viewpoints, we live and let live, we donāt violently attack or insult other groups simply because they disagree with us.
āIf you disagree with me, thatās fine. You can live on your land, and Iāll live on mine. We will go on with our lives, in peace. I wonāt blow you up or shoot you down, and you wonāt do so to me either. Yes, we may disagree, but we wonāt raid each otherās homes and destroy each otherās families... simply because we disagree.ā This is a more evolved standpoint.
12:03 PM.
We need a collective purpose, a collective goal. Humanity is a train-wreck right now. America, and her ideals, has been a global leader for decades, and now America is a clusterfuck.
Too many things get lost in translation between countries. Too many people and corporations are ābeating the competitionā rather than āworking together to find the best solutionsā. Too many people are power-hungry and egoic and not seeing the bigger picture. Too many people are afraid and confused and fearful of death; and when people are afraid and confused, they sometimes act defensively and violently.
Too many people are overwhelmed by the constant bombardment of media and information, much of which is not only pointless but is also damaging to oneās peace of mind. Too few people have taken the time to meditate and contemplate deeply the true nature of the universe.
Too many people are without mentors, without guidance. Too many people have so many questions, but no one to answer them.
This is why I want to be a Thought Leader. The world needs guidance, direction, stability, understanding, structure, philosophy, wisdom. But there doesnāt seem to be enough people distributing these things.
Wisdom hasnāt gone mainstream yet.
And will it ever go mainstream? This question has literally been debated for thousands of years. Ancient philosophers have written, including those who authored The Kybalion, that āthe Truth is reserved for the brave fewā and āthe masses will never know the Truthā (or something along those lines).
But Iām an idealist. I disagree. I say: āWhy not?ā Why canāt we have the world we desire?
āBut, Juvoci, you saidā (in the last blog post) āthat some people desire war!ā
Yes, I did. But the desire for war is, in my estimation, a more superficial desire than the desire for peace.
I believe that, deep down, EVERYONE simply desires PEACE and HAPPINESS.
And those who pursue war, only do so because, deep down, they believe it will lead to PEACE and HAPPINESS.
In other words, people who wage war believe that war is the only option, the last resort, our only chance, for a peaceful world.
Of course, this is not the case, and is in fact completely wrong, completely opposite of the truth. This is the definition of evil, of devilry.
War only leads to more war.
When you wage war against someone, a grudge is formed. When you destroy a culture, destroy a family, destroy a people, they donāt forget, they get angry, they get depressed, and they label you āthe devilā, they slowly and quietly rebuild their power, and then they come back to bite you.
And then you may say: āBut what if you eradicate them completely so that they cannot ever return?ā Sure, but then your people will remember what you did to those people. āRemember what our empire did to those people we destroyed? That was kind of messed up.ā And then there is a deep collective regret in the population which must eventually be repented and made-up-for, lest the society be eaten alive from within by its own shame and guilt of its own violent history. And the cycle continues...
Just like, in your own personal life, you cannot purify, you cannot cleanse your soul, until youāve repented for the evil youāve done. Until then, your soul, your spirit, is broken, shattered, split.
The neuroticisms of a culture, a society, a nation, seep into the hearts of its citizens, and destroy it from within.
The most powerful thing that a leader can grant... is peace. Not dominance, not power, not wealth... peace.
But then there are the questions: What of that evil which lurks in the shadows? How do we defend against it? If we focus only on peace, wonāt we be blind-sided by a secretive malevolent faction? If we focus only on peace, we wonāt fund our militaries, and then we will be vulnerable to evil forces, right?
And this is true. Although I wish this were not the case, I cannot deny it. If we donāt keep our guard up, to some extent, then evil could once again overcome us.
Just as the sage must constantly remind herself of the Truth, society must remind itself of Evil. History repeats itself, so remember history.
So what does this mean for military funding?
On a material level, it means two things.
Firstly, we must prioritize defense over offense. Donāt develop military technology for the sake of attacking and conquering. Develop military technology for the sake of protecting.
Secondly, we must redefine our enemy. Americaās enemy is not Russia or China. Chinaās enemy is not America or Japan. Australiaās enemy is not Russia or North Korea. Etcetera, etcetera, etcetera...
No, Humanityās enemy is Chaos, Insanity. Humanityās enemy is Ignorance, Violence, Immaturity, Ego. This is how we must redefine our enemy.
But letās bring this, once again, to a spiritual level, a metaphysical level, to a level beyond materiality.
Ultimately, we are talking about FEAR. āWhat if Evil grows stronger while the rest of us are focusing on Peace? What if we detract from military funding and leave ourselves vulnerable and get destroyed by an evil faction? What if? What if? What if...?ā
These are questions of fear.
FAITH over FEAR.
This is where my Thought Leadership re-enters.
We must all subscribe to a philosophy of Faith over Fear.
Now, this is easier said than done, obviously. And Iām not trying to claim that Iāve fully succeeded in this realm. I never claimed to be perfect. But itās the direction I try to move in, and itās the direction that Iām encouraging you to move in aswell.
What is Faith over Fear?
This is getting into some pretty deep spiritual and metaphysical areas, but Iāll do my best to explain, especially because many people who read this, who havenāt dived deeply into spirituality and metaphysics, might not exactly understand what Iām saying. But Iāll give it a shot.
Faith is a fundamental force of the universe. Now, Iām not talking about Christian Faith or Islamic Faith or Jewish Faith or Buddhist Faith or whatever. No. Iām talking about pure Faith. Iām talking about Faith as a fundamental, pure, force.
In fact, Faith is so fundamental to the Structure of Reality that, at a certain point, it becomes physical, it becomes material, it melds and merges into the physical world. Donāt believe me? Keep meditating.
Faith is the reason you wake up in the morning. Faith is the reason youāre able to walk on solid ground. Faith is what keeps the entire universe in motion. Faith is a fundamental force. We can call this concept FFF or F-Cubed. The fundamental force of faith. Maybe the FFF thing is dumb. I donāt know. Whatever, moving on. Lol. (If youāve made it this far in the blog, take a moment to breathe and relax and recognize that nothing is like super serious necessarily.)
But, yeah, Faith is super important. Pure faith. You exist because you believe in your existence. Without that fundamental structure of belief (which is another way of saying Faith), your entire being would collapse and disintegrate into a vortex of chaos and structurelessness. Donāt believe me? Well, I wouldnāt recommend experimenting with this concept unless youāre truly a Master of the Mind... because this can be dangerous territory.
So why am I talking about Faith now? Because Faith over Fear. Faith is the antidote to Fear, and Faith is your savior.
Yes, Evil could be out there, plotting your demise. Yes, the Universe could implode suddenly and instantaneously, destroying everything and everyone youāve ever known. Yes, an asteroid could land on New York City, killing millions. Yes, some rogue country *cough* could drop an atomic bomb and decimate Humanity. Yes, danger, danger, danger, fear, fear, fear, possibilities, possibilities, endless fearful possibilities.
But canāt you see? It goes on and on and on and on and on. The mind can think of infinite reasons to be afraid, to fear evil.
But hereās where Spirituality and Metaphysics swoop in and save the day...
FEAR CREATES EVIL.
Yes, literally, Fear creates Evil. No, even further... Fear is Evil.
As Franklin D. Roosevelt (allegedly) said (I wasnāt there): āWe have nothing to fear but Fear itself.ā This quote is actually quite wise. Well, itās, like... almost wise. The only reason it isnāt completely wise is because it implies that we still have to fear something.
But the point is (or at least, the Truth that I see in the quote) that Fear is the enemy. And, from my experience with spirituality, Faith is the antidote to Fear. In other words, when your being is aligned in Faith, your āenemyā ceases to exist, because all is one and all is you and so all is in Faith.
These are pretty deep ideas; and if you donāt understand exactly what Iām saying, donāt worry. Just stick with me, and eventually you will understand.
:)
1:06 PM.
Okay, so, I feel like Iāve kind of beaten that topic to death. Letās give it a rest for a little while. Letās get back to that point about Philosophy.
In my last blog post, I said that Philosophy is dumb. But, obviously, I need to elaborate on this, not only because this statement will probably offend some percentage of people, but also because itās a pretty vague statement.
So, what exactly do I mean? And why exactly am I saying this?
Firstly, letās define Philosophy. Yesterday, I posted in two sub-Reddits (the Philosophy and AskPhilosophy sub-Reddits) asking the simple question: What is Philosophy?
Both of my posts got banned from those sub-Reddits. This is strange, and doesnāt make any sense to me. If your sub-Reddit is about Philosophy, then one of the most important questions on that sub-Reddit should be... What is Philosophy?
Duh?
But, for some reason, the moderators of those sub-Reddits thought such a question should not be on their sub-Reddits and so they removed it. And now, in my mind, these two sub-Reddits have lost some respect and credibility.
But, whatever, maybe thatās a signal that āWhat is Philosophy?ā is a dumb and unnecessary question.
Perhaps I can define Philosophy simply by explaining why I think parts of it (not all of it) are dumb.
To me, Philosophy becomes dumb when it becomes about using big words, and how many philosophical terms you know, and arguing about the nature of reality, and choosing one side or one philosophy and being an ardent advocate of that one philosophy or opinion or perspective.
These aspects of āthe Philosophy worldā are dumb to me because they miss the point. Reality is infinite. The universe is infinite. There are infinite perspectives. Everyoneās life is different, and everyoneās unique life experiences lead them to believe certain things about reality.
You might be a staunch Atheist, but if one day you went to sleep and woke up in a garden where Krishna explained to you the metaphysical workings of the universe, and you existed in this garden for thousands of years, exploring the world of spirituality, before finally, eventually, after those thousands of years, returning back into your human body, to this human life... you might have second thoughts about your staunch Atheistic beliefs.
So who are you to say that someone who identifies as Hindu and has had a similar spiritual experience with Krishna is wrong? And likewise, who are they to say that someone who identifies as Atheist and hasnāt had any spiritual experiences, like you (the staunch Atheist)... is wrong?
See? Nobody is wrong. Everyone just has different life experiences.
So, whatever your Philosophy is, it isnāt right or wrong. Itās just one perspective of infinite perspectives.
A lot of philosophy is just preaching. Just rattling off complex names and concepts and big words, just arguing pointlessly about abstractions.
Real Philosophy is about listening. This is, if I am to make a distinction here, the difference between Philosophy and Wisdom. Philosophy literally means love of wisdom. But perhaps Love of Wisdom isnāt always the same as Wisdom itself, in the same way that you may āloveā your spouse, but not necessarily treat them well, or know them well.
Arguing with people on Reddit (or any other forum), for example, about why your Philosophy is right... is a pretty deformed version of Philosophy, in my opinion. If you want to grow as a philosopher, if you want to grow more wise, spend more time listening and asking questions, rather than preaching. Then, if someone asks you a question, you can expound your knowledge.
Philosophy has been dubbed āa scienceā by many individuals and institutions. But one of the problems with modern Science, in my opinion, is over-categorization.
Science creates categories upon categories upon categories, dividing and dividing and dividing. Now, donāt get me wrong, there isnāt necessarily anything wrong with categorization. In fact, there isnāt even anything necessarily wrong with over-categorization.
In some sense, excess categorization is the natural evolution of language and quantifiable knowledge. As our understanding of the world becomes more and more nuanced, we naturally will create more and more terms and thus categories for explaining and identifying it.
The problem arises when we begin identifying with our identifiers. When a scientist or philosopher says āI am a Materialistā or āI am an Existentialistā or āI am a Stoicā, they are missing the point of Philosophy and Science, in my opinion.
This is the problem with Identity. When you identify with one finite piece of an infinite reality, you inherently limit yourself. Better to have as small of an identity as possible, and simply observe reality. To me, this is what Philosophy and Science are truly about. Egoless observation of reality, in the name of Truth.
2:02 PM.
Okay, Iāve been writing on and off for awhile Iām gonna take a break and do something else. Be back later, maybe.
:)
instagram.com/juvoci
twitter.com/juvoci
This blog can be read in its entirety on JUVOCI.com.
0 notes
8 January 2021
This blog can be read in its entirety on JUVOCI.com.
8 January 2021.
One document. One page. Simply thoughts.
But then the question arises: Which font should I write my thoughts in? Every font has its own personality. And where should I post my thoughts? On a blog? On Twitter? On Tumblr? On Instagram? All of them? One of them? None of them? My old school composition notebook which will probably be destroyed in a fire someday?
And then it becomes about someone not reading my writing. Whatās the point of writing if no one reads it? But then I tell myself, I should just do it for myself. Read my own writing and Iāll get better at it. And should I promote my writing or is that vain? And is my writing even good enough to be promoted? I donāt want to bother people, offering them a flaming pile of garbage.
And when people tell me they love my writing are they just lying so I donāt feel bad? And when people tell me my writing sucks are they just jealous? Is it all up to me to decide how the world sees me? Is the world what I see it as, and not what anyone else sees, so that only my opinion ultimately matters? Because all is one?
I donāt know.
There are some things you should share with the world and there are some things that you shouldnāt. But how does one know the difference?
Anyways, I want to be a writer. Or... I am a writer...? Iām writing now, so I guess I am...? Uh, well, anyways. Yeah, I love writing. I love words. Typing sentences on the keyboard to me is like playing the piano, conducting a symphony. Language is beautiful. I love the lines which make up letters which make up words which make up sentences. I love how sentences have meaning, but they are also open to interpretation because all language is relative and infinite. Thereās no way for me to express exactly what I mean and thereās no way for you to understand exactly what I mean. Youāll interpret my words for yourself, and any certainty you have about what I intended to mean is still just part of your interpretation. Itās an infinite regress, a fractal, beautiful.
I love writing. But hereās the dilemma I have: No motivation to publish anything. Or at least not publish anything in a āformal and edited and professionalā way. When I spend too much time āre-reading and editingā my writing, I lose the spark of the original moment in which I wrote it. I lose that muse, that excitement, that inspiration. The moment dies, so to speak. The most natural way of writing, to me, seems to be publishing and writing simultaneously. Sort of like how Twitter works. You write something, and you publish it. Thereās no intermediary step. Whatever you write, is published, in real-time. This feels more natural to me, most authentic, most productive. But then there is a fear in me that says āThis is too lazy, this is too unprofessional, no one wants to read this crap, youāre just rambling,ā blah blah blah... And part of me is like āYeah, dude, youāre right. This is terrible.ā But another part of me is like āHell nah, fuck that, this shit is dope, youāre writing from the heart, youāre not even editing it, itās raw expression, itās dope, and you should definitely publish this and continue publishing everything you write cuz itās dope.ā Lol, and then another voice is like āYo, I feel like yāall are both wrong. I feel like one of you is being too hard on yourself and the other is being too arrogant.ā And then the real me is like āBruh, I donāt even know.ā
See? Now there goes my mind again. āIs that good or bad? Is my writing good or bad? Was that last paragraph terrible and dumb? Am I terrible and dumb?ā
Itās such an interesting position to be in because you want to trust yourself but you also donāt want to become so trusting of yourself that you become delusional and blind to the inputs of the external world, but then you think that maybe your hesitation about trusting yourself is causing you to be worse at your craft and thus have less of a chance of being successful in that craft... you know?
But I think that the deepest part of me, my core, my heart, or whatever, wants to trust myself more. I feel my intuition leans in that direction. Because the question still remains: āWhat if I did trust myself completely? What would become of my reality?ā
Itās 3:31 PM on Friday.
Writing Fiction.
Part of me wants to write fiction. Iām so conflicted in this area. I think that creating fictional worlds, fictional characters, fictional stories... itās all really cool. They are really great ways to explore other worlds and other ways of thinking. But whenever I begin writing a fictional story (and Iāve started literally hundreds ā and maybe even thousands ā of stories ā almost finishing a few of them but never actually finishing one ā and certainly thousands of characters... along with languages, planets, species, religions, and more), I always lose the motivation for it before finishing (and usually before coming even close to finishing).
So, naturally, I ask myself: āWhy do I lose the motivation to finish these fiction novels?ā And the answer has usually been: āBecause theyāre not relevant.ā
Now, I do think that I am quite hard on myself, and I would bet that some of the fictional stories Iāve written could actually be relevant and somewhat successful and influence their readerās lives... but going back and publishing those stories would feel like trying to relive the past. Iāve moved on from those stories. Publishing them now would be like putting my fourth-grade science project (a āBaking Soda Volcanoā) on display. It wouldnāt make sense from a personal standpoint.
I would rather write whatās on my mind today and publish that... which is what Iām doing now, I suppose.
3:53 PM.
There is something really special and interesting about simply documenting my life and my mind. Thereās something raw and liberating about it. Iām simply just being me. Not more, not less, just me.
Sometimes I feel pretentious when Iām writing fiction. It feels like Iām trying to escape this world, like Iām too good for this world, like Iām trying to be more than I am, something Iām not.
Is my ārealā life so much less interesting than a fictional life? Or could it be that ārealā life is in fact the most interesting story of all? Iām starting to believe the latter.
I also havenāt been super interested in reading fiction. Or really anything much for that matter, other than conversations. I find conversations to be the most engaging reading and writing. Because itās occurring in real-time, itās a live event, youāre literally engaging with āanother beingā.
I donāt even have that much interest in reading my own writing. Occasionally Iāll review a few things I posted a week ago or month ago or year ago or whatever... but the vast majority of what I write is never actually read.
Bitcoin / Cryptocurrency.
Bitcoin is really cool. Itās interesting that itās blowing up now. It has blown up before, but this seems bigger than ever. Itās really going mainstream, it seems. Corporations are buying it, banks are buying it, maybe nations will start buying it soon. Although if nations start buying it then theyāre basically forfeiting their own currency, at least to some extent. But I think we should all embrace cryptocurrency. It seems like a great idea. Itās very safe, itās very easy, thereās a static supply so that inflation and corruption cannot flourish. Sometimes growth takes sacrifice. I think nations should start sacrificing their local currencies for the sake of Bitcoin.
Imagine if the United States of America invested itself in Bitcoin. Imagine the global response. Imagine what that would do to the currency market.
4:05 PM.
I want to be a Thought Leader. Iām eating oatmeal right now, by the way. Oatmeal with fruit and honey and nuts. Good stuff.
Anyways, yeah, I wanna be a Thought Leader. Thatās an ambition of mine, I suppose.
What does it mean to be a Thought Leader? Well, first letās define thought.
What is thought?
Thought is many things, and many more things, depending on how you define it. Generally, I use thought to mean āa woman who has many casual sexual encounters or relationshipsā, just kidding. Generally, I use thought to mean āidea, inspiration, creation, imagination, realization, literally even the fabric of realityā.
Thatās the ābiggerā version of thought. However, when I say that I want to be a Thought Leader, I am not referring to that type of thought. I am referring to language. The construction of sentences and the words we choose to use. The meaning we give to words and the way inwhich we use them have a pretty profound impact on our day-to-day reality. I think youād be surprised just how much your mental and verbal language impacts your life.
This is why we need Thought Leaders. Thought Leaders help keep the collective mind on track. Thought Leaders are masters of navigating the mind. Now, donāt get me wrong, I have a lot of improvement to make still, but one of my talents or skills is certainly a deep understanding of the mind.
Now, some people might call this an arrogant statement. āHow dare you claim that youāre a master of the mind and that you should lead my thought!ā And, yes, I agree, I understand, it is indeed something of an arrogant statement. But confidence is often confused for arrogance. Michael Jordon, Michael Phelps, Michael Tyson (his birth name is actually Michael, I just googled it)... these three athletes were confidence about their skills and talents. Or were they arrogant? Who cares? This is just semantics. They perform, and thatās what matters.
Well, I perform with the mind, with thought. I understand it deeply. And through this understanding, Iāve cultivated an incredible mind to exist as. And I want to share this gift.
And, yes, like I mentioned, I still have alot of improvements to make. I have nowhere near reached the peak of my mental (or physical) potential. But Iāve already made a lot of progress, and Iām improving everyday.
So what gives me the gall to declare myself worthy of the title Thought Leader? Well, Iāve spent my whole life introspecting, philosophizing, contemplating... and over the course of my life, everyday until today, and so likely for days to come, Iāve observed people suffering by the hand of their own minds. Anxiety, depression, fear ā these things plague us.
The problem is that people are afraid of what they donāt understand. I start telling people about the incredible revelations Iāve experienced and they donāt understand and so it frightens them and they try to change the subject. The act of awakening is becoming self-conscious, and some folks just donāt seem to want to become self-conscious. But like Tim Ferriss says in his interview with Guy Raz: āItās not about who doesnāt understand, itās about who does.ā (That might not be the exact quote, but he does say something like that.) Why focus on who doesnāt understand? You can find endless people who wonāt understand. What matters is how many people do understand. One other person? Five people? Fifty? A million? Thatās what matters. Expand your network of comprehension, not your perception of misunderstanding.
I understand, though. Becoming self-aware can be scary, especially if you havenāt become self-aware in a long time. Itās kind of like looking in your basement after not cleaning it for 30 years. It isnāt always pleasant if you havenāt done any spring-cleaning, but if you wanna clean the place up then youāre gonna have to face it.
But itās sort of like... if you donāt jump in, youāll never get wet... as the old saying goes. You gotta let your mind be blown every now and then. You gotta let your identity shape-shift and change from time to time.
4:34 PM.
I never claimed to be perfect.
4:42 PM.
So what is this āthoughtā that Iām āleadingā?
Firstly, Peace and Love. I believe in peace and love. Now, yes, this sounds corny, cheesy, overly-wholesome... whatever. But, itās right and true, I believe.
I believe that systems work better when there is harmony. Metallic machines run better when theyāre lubricated with oil (I hope this metaphor makes sense because Iām not exactly a āmechanicā). Government and society and civilization work better when there is peace. Imagine if humans all over the planet started working together instead of fighting. Imagine how much time and energy and resources we would save if we stopped fighting against and arguing with each other.
Now, donāt me wrong. I recognize that competition is a huge catalyst for innovation. And I do not believe that we should eliminate competition. However, I think competition is useful for games, not wars. Iāll make a distinction between games and wars: In a society which games, everyone can ultimately win because the stakes arenāt death and utter destruction. Sure, the winners are awarded with a bigger reward, but the heads of the losers arenāt chopped off, their cultures arenāt destroyed, their families arenāt ruined. They can lose, learn from their mistakes, dust themselves off, and try again. And at the end of the day, everyone can smile and have fun and hang out together.
This would be a society built on games, not on war. This would be a more evolved, more enlightened society, in my opinion.
5:02 PM.
Gonna stretch out with some quick exercises like weight-lifting and hand-stands. Be back sometime later.
5:26 PM.
Exercising is so great. Such a great feeling. Highly recommend it if youāre not involved.
And washing your face or body with cold water is super refreshing, by the way.
11:10 PM.
Letās get back to this Thought Leader idea. I think thatās important. What thought am I leading?
It begins with Peace and Love, yes. But thereās more to it than that. If simply saying āPeace and Loveā were the solutions to our problems, then we wouldnāt have any problems, because I just said it. No, our problems are more complex, so just how do we manifest peace and love?
How do we manifest peace and love?
Firstly, it begins with a desire. We have to want peace and love. And it doesnāt seem like this is our current reality. It seems like alot of people want war. Now, Iām not certain that this is true. Iām not sure that many people would actually say āI want war.ā But some folks sure behave like they want war. Some folks seem to become excited by the idea of war. Perhaps they havenāt much else to live for? Perhaps they are bored with their current life and a war would shake things up? Perhaps they are prisoners, and hope to escape in the fray? I donāt know.
Secondly, once we decide that we desire peace and love, we must introspect. We must practice self-awareness, self-consciousness, and watch ourselves closely so that we donāt slip up, back into our old violent ways. We must become very careful of ourselves not to resort to violence, and to solve our disagreements peacefully.
Thirdly, now that weāve decided that we indeed do desire peace and love, and now that weāve practiced and mastered self-awareness and self-consciousness through introspection and contemplation, we must set collective goals for ourselves, and we must give our collective world meaning and purpose. Why must we do this? Because a lack of purpose causes things (like human minds) to become chaotic, and chaos leads to insanity and forgetfulness, and insanity leads to violence... because the insane person has forgotten the commitment that they made to be peaceful. The mind is designed for meaning and purpose. Without these things, the mind begins to go insane.
But itās not all just mental. Itās physical too.
In order to achieve Peace and Love, we must alleviate greed. Greed still permeates our global culture too much. A tiny bit of personal greed can actually be good, because it motivates you to achieve more for yourself and your family. But we live in a world today that is permeated by corporate greed and greed at an unfathomable scale. The inherent problem with greed is that the greedy person always wants more. And now we have found ourselves in a world where some people have access to so much wealth, and some people are struggling just for clean water. No wonder there is conflict and violence. Our rich and wealthy family members arenāt showing enough love to those who are struggling. Instead, they would rather flaunt their expensive clothing and cars on Instagram and such. We must remove this greed if we are to achieve Peace and Love.
Some people might say: āWorld peace is a childish ideal and will never manifest on Earth.ā But why? What is your motivation for saying this? Deep down, do you wish it to be true? Do you actually like violence and conflict, perhaps? Are you creating negativity in your day-to-day life? Is the energy of your spirit attracted to negativity like a moth is attracted to light? Is this the best way to live? Perhaps you should make a change?
I believe that world peace is possible, and I will likely continue encouraging it forever.
11:48 PM.
Lately Iāve been feeling like philosophy is kind of dumb. Hereās the philosophy: The universe is infinite. Do whatever you want. But what is philosophy, exactly?
I posted in the Philosophy sub-Reddit asking āWhat is Philosophy?ā Letās see what they say.
They banned my post. I donāt know why. Iām going to ask the same question in the AskPhilosophy sub-Reddit.
They also banned my post. Kind of ironic that you canāt ask āWhat is Philosophy?ā in āPhilosophyā sub-Reddits, eh?
(This discussion is continued on the next blog post for 9 January 2021)
instagram.com/juvoci
1830.co
This blog can be read in its entirety on JUVOCI.com.
0 notes
Ha Long Bay in Vietnam
11 notes
Ā·
View notes
0 notes
Griffin
6 notes
Ā·
View notes
I Am A Writer
I am a writer. A writer is someone who names things, and defines them. Now, when a reader reads the written work of a writer, that reader is putting much trust in that writer. Why? Because that reader is letting that writer into their mind, letting the writer name and define things for them, and leading them down an untraveled mental pathway. But donāt you worry, dear reader; I wonāt lead you astray; only far enough, perhaps, for you to see something new, something shiny swimming out on the edge of your mindās purview; but not so far that you fall off that edge, and lose yourself in the tangling infinite chaos of such unknowable voids.
2 notes
Ā·
View notes
Cyclic Apocalypse
Civilization built on the backs of hard-working heroes who instill morality and work-ethic into their followers, then the civilization is successful and with more success comes more spoiled-ness and apathy, and with more spoiled-ness and apathy comes the decline of the civilization, until it is taken over by hard-working heroes.
Civilizations are often established by wise and strong leaders, but their successor can either be better, equal, or worse, and itās like flipping a coin. Get a few good ones in a row and youāve got yourself an enduring kingdom, but get a few bad ones in a row and the kingdom wonāt last long.
Without attention, leadership becomes bureaucracy, corruption sets in, and important processes become mindlessly ritualized; the origin and purpose of these rituals becomes forgotten.
0 notes
A short poem I wrote:
0 notes
2 notes
Ā·
View notes
Virtual Reality, a Convenient Philosophy
The philosophy of a virtual game is a very convenient one.
For example: We create a world where human beings, much in their primordial flesh-and-blood state, are flying around in spaceships, from planet to planet, activating hyper-drive and traveling at warp-speed. Then we may ask ourselves: āIf these humans are scientifically-advanced enough to travel the galaxy at warp-speed, then why are they still in their flesh-and-blood bodies? Why havenāt they melded with computers? Why arenāt they cyborgs?ā
When we watch science-fiction films and see human beings traveling around the galaxy in a giant spaceship while having arguments, creating drama, eating and drinking... we may ask ourselves: āIf these humans are scientifically-advanced enough to travel the galaxy in a giant spaceship, why are they still involved in petty conflicts? Why are they still eating crappy food and drinking coffee? Why has their environment improved drastically from a scientific perspective, and yet has been unchanged biologically and emotionally speaking?ā
This is where the philosophy of a virtual game comes into play. This, a very convenient philosophy.
In our virtual game, the human being is the character, the avatar. Then, the game developer inserts this human avatar into any environment it pleases: 2000 AD on Planet Earth in the Milky Way Galaxy, or year 2000 BC on Planet Earth in the Milky Way Galaxy, or another planet altogether, or another galaxy... or maybe on a spaceship in the middle of nowhere!
0 notes
0 notes
Nihilism versus Meaning-Making
Nihilism and negative thinking are toxic to your personal life, and they seep and spread into the culture and community as a whole. Like a virus, one negatively-thinking individual will infect another individual with that nihilism and despair; and if left unchecked, the disease will spread exponentially. To prevent this, it must be fought with positive-thinking and meaning-making.
A depressing approach is to view decay and nihilism as inevitable; the psychological counterparts of entropy; that we are a dwindling flame in an endless and uncaring darkness, waiting for a dawn that will never come; that, at best, our existence is meaningless; and at worst, that the small fires of hope burning in our chests serve only as beacons to attract predators; that if you want to live, you should hide, or encourage others to light beacons, distracting the predators away from you, or appease their hunger by providing them with others as victims.
0 notes