What Polyamory Does For The It Fandom VS In The St Fandom.
These are some brain worms I've had for a while and I've decided to share, regardless if it makes some people mad. Although that is truly not the intent of this post. Anyways. If you haven't been in the It fandom and only have stayed in the St fandom this post may not make sense but I do encourage you to read it.
I joined the It fandom in 2017. I'm one of those few people who were in the It fandom first before moving over to also join the St fandom in late late 2017/early 2018. I had a blog for consuming content but I didn't start making content until 2020 for the It fandom and more recently and regularly for the St fandom. Anywho what I'm trying to say is that I've seen a lot.
I loved many ships in the It fandom and one of the main ships is Poly Losers Club. This is the first fandom I've seen where a poly ship was one of the more popular ones. Even if someone didn't ship all the Losers, throuple and quatrouples (is that how you say it?) have always been popular in this fandom.
Because it is almost unanimously agreed across the fandom, that whether platonically or romantically, all the Losers love each other. Even the most die hard of reddie shippers, the fandom's most popular ship, can often agree on certain fanon headcannons, Stan and Richie practiced their first kiss on each other, Eddie's first crush was on poor oblivious Bill. And that comes back to the agreement that all the Losers love each other. Ships in this fandom have never had an issue coexisting. If someone shipped something different from someone it was always more like "oh that's not my favorite but I definitely see where you're coming from'" OR they're like "yeah no they're in love too," Hardly ever any belittling or any superiority complexes.
That's what makes being in this fandom fun and easy.
Poly Losers even often features a gay man and a women and I've read many beautiful fics where this is explained as they're more best friends than lovers but Eddie doesn't love Bev any less because she's a woman. This fandom allows Eddie and Bev to have an amazing and emotionally intimate relationship because I feel like this fandom does understand, for the most part, that platonic love is just as important as romantic love.
Now on to the St fandom. There are some poly party shippers out there but they are far and few. And there is SO MUCH shipping discourse. Yes I could talk about Mileven and Byler but come on, it goes beyond that. It's with Jany and Stancy, Ronance and Rockie. Elmax and Lumax, and Steddie and Stonathan. Just about every ship you think of there is an alternate ship that people will fight for. They will belittle you for shipping something they don't, and insist that your ship is nothing but platonic. That,,,that just doesn't happen in the It fandom. You know the joke, "All the Losers had a crush on Bill at one point," I think that in itself says a lot. Bill, the arguably least liked character, (my poor bb), has the joke that all the losers had a crush on him at one point.
I'm getting off track. Anyways I'm not saying that shipping everyone together in a poly sense would fix everything with these shipping wars but i do believe why there was never any shipping wars in the It fandom was because of Poly Losers. Also when I talk about poly in St I mean it like Poly Party and Poly teenage crew. Not together, I hate that I have to clarify that.
In the St fandom, it's just not as universally agreed that everyone loves each other, even in the basic platonic sense. All anyone seems to care about in the St fandom is romantic love. A lot of shippers want to be right, they want to prove that their ship will be cannon which just,,,sucks the fun right out fandom spaces.
Canon, fanon, why can't people just make cute fan art and talk in babbles about thoughts they have on a ship. Why do you have to be right about what's going to be the canon ship? Why do certain people feel the need to put down and even to the extent as far as bullying people who ship something different? I've never seen a fandom so focused on 'canon pairings' like the st fandom. (Side note I was never in the sherlock and supernatural fandoms, I knew to mention this)
The party, like the losers, are friends who have been through turmoil that have bound them together for a lifetime. I don't care what pairing you give me from st, whether it be a platonic or a romantic one, I will tell you that those characters deeply care for each other.
Side note: it's worth a mention that the Duffer brothers originally wanted to film the It remake and when they didn't get it, we got Stranger Things. It can be argued that the Party is based off the Losers club so you know what that means? THEY ALL LOVE EACH OTHER. Take it as platonic or romantic idc.
Again, I don't think that poly party is the answer to ending the shipping wars. I do think however that if people could remember how much the party members mean to each other, that that could make less tiring fandom spaces.
Okay I'm done. I just thought this was an interesting point on how it's been like in the It fandom vs the St fandom.
Wait I was doing tags and I forgot to mention that there are few people who ship Elumax and Stoncy, two throuples and kudos to them. They're just worth a mention, I didn't forget about ya'll
111 notes
·
View notes
there's something to be said about how public unawareness about aspec identities contributes to the infighting within the aspec communities.
for example, I've seen a lot of "don't say ace people don't have sex because that's harmful to the sex favourable aces" and the opposite: "don't say ace people can have sex because what about the sex repulsed/averse?"
and they're both valid points, but because of it, aspec posts have to cater to the entire spectrum or risk starting arguments over this. Ideally, people could look at an aspec post and accept that it's for a different part of the aro/ace spectrum to where they are, but that's where the public unawareness comes in
because outside of the aspec communities, there's so little understanding of what the terms mean, that people within the community have to make every post generic so that the unaware won't see one post and make an assumption for the entire community based on it.
I see where every side is coming from, but infighting doesn't really solve any of the issues. The only thing that can start to solve it is more expansive aspec media representation, and spreading the "aro/ace identities are a spectrum" posts as much as possible to reach outside of the community, rather than trying to make specific posts fit that generic message.
820 notes
·
View notes
Listen this shit breaks my heart too and I'm 100% willing to drop Wilbur if it's actually him, but the way some of y'all are actively (and very VERY furiously) taking sides about something that is intentionally being kept vague is kind of weird.
I have been through Amino, Wattpad witchhunts, and so much more. But it's so fucking weird how some of you guys are like "There is no doubt it has to be him!" or "There is no doubt it can't be him!" Shelby is keeping this shit vague for a purpose and Wilbur literally hasn't been on his Twitter in months. You guys are on the same level as those weirdos back in 2016 who would speculate about private things between children, stop it.
It's especially weird how you guys are making DEFENSE AND EVIDENCE posts for him. Stop playing lawyer and Sherlock! Just tell people there's evidence pointing to Wilbur if asked why he's involved, link whatever is needed, and stop making your goddamn threads/posts/whatevers!! I know I'm overusing the word weird, but it's the only way I can describe this. You're not helping her by trying to piece together who it is when she probably FEARED THIS HAPPENING, especially if it IS him.
Stop defending Wilbur for your life. Stop fighting Wilbur through the screen for your life. This parasocial shit is getting out of hand, you don't know either of them. Support Shelby.
15 notes
·
View notes
You know what sucks about simblr? That your posts have to be "pretty" for people to care about them. You have to have a good shader and/or use photoshop. You have edit your screenshots and make all your sims look super cute. You have to have lots of CC. And if you don't? No one likes your posts. No one follows you back. No one wants to interact with you.
Not everyone is like this but SO many people are and it really sucks. I get it; it's nice to look at pretty things. But some people don't have the skill or time or energy to put in that effort, and they deserve just as much attention.
This might not reach anyone since I am definitely not a simblr with "pretty" content, but I hope someone sees it. I post on tumblr because I like sharing my creations, but it's always nice to know people care about your content.
The legacy I'm currently re-reading has 104 notes on the post where the heir is born. I have 9. And even that is high compared to some people's posts.
This rant might be completely pointless, but I needed to get this off my chest. Because it really does feel sucky to see other people get loads of attention when your gameplay doesn't - and the only difference is how nice your picture is.
8 notes
·
View notes
This might piss some people off but that's fine. It needs to be said. Again, apparently.
I've been thinking about all the posts against self deprecation I've seen lately and just... Why are you demanding someone change how they use a coping mechanism for YOUR comfort?
If you don't like how someone talks about themselves, you don't have to be their friend.
Nobody is forcing you to be around them.
Are there arguments to be made that it's bad for them and you just care? Sure. But it's also more complicated than that. You being uncomfortable with it doesn't mean it's hurting you. And you don't get to be the authority on what hurts them.
To stay on the 'hole' analogy I saw most recently: you come across someone stuck in a hole. Whether they put themselves there, they were pushed, or they fell isn't really the question. It's what are you going to do about it?
You can walk away. Leave them in the hole.
You can stand at the top of the hole yelling that they should find a ladder and throwing rocks at them.
You can look for a ladder and offer it down to them. Whether they choose to climb it is up to them. You can choose to leave them or climb down and sit with them and encourage them up.
You can jump in, sit with them, help build up a way to get out of the hole.
I know y'all thinking that you're offering a ladder when you criticize the person in the hole doing what they need to do to survive the hole but you're actually just standing on the edge throwing shit at them. Offering a ladder means actually providing a resource that works for their situation. Maybe you're offering a rope when they can't actually use a rope.
Maybe consider just walking away or actually sitting with them instead?
People use self deprecation for all sorts of reasons. And it's not inherently bad. AND people are allowed to be negative or cynical or pessimistic and not be required to change for your comfort. Not everyone's brain is happy go go all of the time (or ever) and if you don't like it, leave them alone. (And spoiler alert: telling someone who IS any of these things to just "be positive" or "love yourself" actually IS hurting them. Now they get to hate themselves and feel like they're wrong for it. AND work really fucking hard to fulfill these arbitrary expectations just for things to not actually get better but now they also don't have a true concept of self but most of y'all don't care about that. Just speaking from experience.)
And if you just want to criticize people, fine. You do you. But stop trying to wrap it all up in a pretty veneer of "just wanting to help." You're not helping.
(and before anyone decides to discount this all as teenaged angst and whining because that's also a fun game I'm not interested in unpacking right now, I'm in my 30s and trying to rediscover who I am after decades of being told I'm too much for everyone else)
3 notes
·
View notes
Hey you know how some people just aren't interested in baseball? The same thing applies to shipping. It's not cool to call them to "boring prudes." It's not cool to declare those who are just not interested in romance as "cold and heartless." It's not cool to refer to those who aren't interested in smut as "missing something."
It's valid to enjoy shipping. Just remember, that it's also valid to not enjoy shipping. The human experience is incredibly varied.
Don't insult people just because their experiences and interests are not the same as yours.
5 notes
·
View notes