I'm so fed up seeing videos about "the downfall of mcyt" or "mcyt history" and then the creator only mentions DSMP and maybe a few youtubers they watched. Like... there. are. so. many. creators. who. counted. or. count. as. mcyt. Here are my thoughts.
There are so, so many who counted, and still so many who count. And yeah, DSMP is an important part of MCYT history, but it's so recent in comparison. Like. Minecraft is a cockroach, it will go through so much shit and still be alive and active. Yes, there are the names who bring or brought down the name of MCYT, but in comparison they've always been such a small part of the community. They need to be remembered for their bad actions, or illegal in some cases, but defining the community by them is not good. Nor is just using one fucking smp.
I have watched, or attempted to watch, those types of videos on the history or the downfall etc., and I always complain internally about it. THERE ARE SO MANY PROMINENT MINECRAFT CONTENT CREATORS THAT FUCKING MADE CONTENT. Some don't make Mc (minecraft) content anymore or they rarely do but it doesn't mean they shouldn't be mentioned. (Yes I know, it's an impossible task to talk about all of them, but mentioning three or four as "the og mcyters" or "the old popular mcyters" just angers me)
DSMP I would say helped with the mc resurgence, but I can say similar to SMP live and SMP earth. I count SMP live as pretty important since I think people started watching the streams and videos from that smp and when DSMP happened people treated the content the same and watched it a lot. People started watching again, then with the boom of content in the covid lockdown people watched more. It wasn't just DSMP though.
Listen if you want to do a video about how DSMP affected you or the minecraft community, sure yeah that's a video to make. If you want to do a video on a specific few ytbers who you watched and how they affected the community yeah sure that's a video to make. To say "these are the three main" that's for you. To you they were the main three. To make the video of "all of mcyt history and mc as a whole" and mention 3 people......... and then DSMP.................... I don't understand you.
I've been a MCYT fan for years and years. As a child and as an adult. From E for everyone videos to watching videos that fucked with my innocence and just exposed me to shit I shouldn't have been watching at the time. Year after year watching different types of videos and different creators. Supporting people and finding out I shouldn't, and supporting people and them being good people. To challenge videos, parkour, adventure maps, droppers, role playing, role playing, let's plays, tutorials, modded content, horror content, hide and seek. So many different types of content exist for mc, and I've been a watcher for a lot of it.
DSMP should not define MCYT. There is too many people who have made content for me to just accept that.
Hold people accountable for their actions, do not define a large community by a few people, and if you want to talk about your favorites affect in the community go right ahead but please don't call them the most popular or most important. Some people might never of heard of them. (I am thinking of the do you know this mcyt blog)
54 notes
·
View notes
so there is this thing I've speculated over many times but I never mathed it out before so:
This tells us that Blaine was born at some point between 6/4/1980 and 5/4/1981 (I assume it's not his birthday bc I feel like he would have mentioned it but he also might not)
We also learn this:
Now this seems to slightly conflict with this -
-but I'm actually more leaning towards the first one, because Angus was actually sane then (by McDonough standards) then and it's a legal "document", while the other is a "Brother Love" doing a sermon.
Also, we can see on screen, that the will was recorded on March 4th 2012 - so minus 35 years, that actually means that she's been working for him since before Blaine was born (1977 or 1978)
Which would really mean she was there all of Blaine's life. This is also kind of supported for me by this:
Now...in present day, Blaine mostly refers to his father by his name, using words like dad or pops etc sometimes for the sake of it. But...assuming that he's actually quoting something he remembered saying at some point (which it sure sounds like in that scene), then he must have been pretty young to still have referred to his father as "daddy" - especially considering Angus' long absence and generally...low tolerance for "weakness" or sentimentality. I feel like he wouldn't have humoured that for long but that's just speculation. But my point is that Blaine would have been pretty young at that point which supports the earlier theory that Frau Bader really was there for most of his life.
The thing is, personally I always speculated that she was hired because Angus was barely home/didn't really spend time with his son and because his mother was too mentally ill/traumatised to take care of a child. but. Unless Blaine has a secret mysterious older sibling we never hear about, Bader cannot possibly have been hired as a nanny. Which kind of makes me wonder whether she was supposed to be a kind of "caretaker" for Blaine's mother before that. (Or whatever else her connection to Angus might be)
18 notes
·
View notes
Can we get more of Nloshe (from the Art of War), pretty please please please 🙏 🥺
i don’t usually go back to goretober pieces. not for lack of wanting to, it just doesn’t usually work out because i’m more interested in newer projects (the werewolf pieces that spawned further work have been the exception and not the rule). the art of war is an all-time personal favorite but it’s also one that i don't want to touch again, it ended right where it should've.
that said, i really love that setup. i'd like to write alien characters again soon.
7 notes
·
View notes
Your family have something precious.
Someone comes and kills your family and steals your family’s precious thing.
You try to get it back but you can’t they are too powerful
Then someone else comes and beats the bad guy and takes the precious thing.
But they will not give it back to you.
Their argument is they did all the hard work. They risked their lives. They lost their friends and family to fight Evil while you tried but failed.
Surely they deserve a little piece of rewards?
Also, they said you do not own that precious thing to begin with. That thing is too good and must be shared with everyone for maximum benefit.
But you grew up with that precious thing in your home and lost your family over that thing and you want to keep it. You dead family will want to have it back.
Of course your family did not make that thing out of air. But your family were the ones to reshape it on so something fascinating, something precious.
You want your family’s precious thing back, and those heroes of the stories ignore your pleads.
Your probably think this is about Silmarils.
But this is also how a lot of Sindar elves think about their lost lands.
—————
Imagine you are a Sindar elf that goes back to where your hometown was after the Long Piece started.
Noldor has built a new city in their own style over the ruin of your home
And they welcome you to stay offering citizenship like they are the owner of the land
They imposed new laws, that are different with laws of you people, and they called their laws advanced and right
If you don’t like the laws, you have the “freedom” to leave. They built this place, after all.
You look at that hill over there. You know the name of that hill. Your father brought you there on your begetting days and planted trees.
Your father was abducted by orcs when the Constrainer came from the west. You don’t know if he is alive or not and you don’t know which is the kinder fate.
Now the trees are gone and there are Noldor houses over the hill, and they gave the hill a new name you do not like.
You want to ask if the trees were burnt in the war, or cut down to make places for the house. You kept your questions to yourself.
They came to fight the dark enemy and they brought back your lost homeland. They do not deserve that hostility.
So you live at their city, learn their language, follow their laws, and in your head you call that hill by its old name.
Then one day the words reached you, and you lost it, you went to your Noldor neighbors to ask is that true is that true you came on ships stained by blood of my own people across the sea
They did not look at your eyes, and you know the rumor is true.
But they had no problem looking at your eyes before. They only show guilt after you find out their crimes
You followed their laws.
But what laws did they follow killing your family to steal their ships?
Had circumstances been difficult, would they kill you to steal your land?
But you will not know. You will not afford to find out.
22 notes
·
View notes
@falling-hand-in-unlovable-hand + @babblish, from (this fic author meta meme)
here's the thing tho: you're both right.
wizards introduced a trio of the tightest, coolest antagonist concepts in the entire toa franchise. it then proceeded to run them directly into the ground through a combination of 1.) rushed writing (wizards) and 2.) bad writing (rott). it's late and i'm not particularly interested in beating this crumbling horse skeleton for the nth time in public, but i'm on my soapbox and the editor has already eaten one version of this post.
the order should be scary. these are the things merlin is afraid of, or at least that he doesn't want to tangle with head-on. they made morgana. but that means nari is scary, too. which is borne out! in her very first appearance, she's the one merlin (!) turns to for help; she's the one who boosts camelot, singlehandedly, to stand against bellroc and skrael. her second appearance introduces her as a necromancer, one, again, powerful enough to accomplish (as if in play) what bellroc and skrael cannot, even working together. she also straight up kills humans at killahead, handily, and never once uses magic to do it. most importantly: her dialogue consistently places her as "one of the order," even if she's currently apart from the other two.
but wizards fails to take its own premises seriously. nari should be terrifying; but the narrative presents her as charming, sweet, having done terrible things but ultimately "heroic," concerned with setting things right. but by her own definition, she's still one third of the arcane order. gdt's entire brand is monster apology. more importantly, we have MULTIPLE on-screen attempts to reach out to "villains" in both trollhunters and 3 below. jim tries to make a connection with fucking bular, of all people! so what's stopping us from extending the same gracious assessment to bellroc and skrael?
"uh, they can't be three-dimensional, they're the bad guys."
a lazy, flimsy justification. and one that doesn't hold up if you've watched even one (1) season of the previous franchise installments.
18 notes
·
View notes