Tumgik
#Background Checks
sixbucks · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
174 notes · View notes
chaoticsorceressztc · 5 months
Text
Today I realized that if we had magic in the real world we would have to have 24/7 grave keepers or shifts and the like walking about the grounds to make sure no one animates the corpse of old Charles Von Eldritch. There'd have to be legal disputes over using someone's reanimated corpse in a movie and whether or not you were allowed to. Just because people would think "Hey! If I 'Employ' a corpse, I DON'T HAVE TO PAY SAID CORPSE!" Grave robbers would be on the rise, and they wouldn't just be robbing graves, half of them would probably be Necromancers trying to work on the black market. You'd have to worry about your dead cousin's corpse appearing on live TV years after their death! Just because some MORON said they had "Totally gotten the rights to do so" when they obviously hadn't.
Grave keepers would definitely need to be pretty powerful just to be able for them to be employed, not to mention how THOROUGH their background checks would have to be to make sure they weren't secretly a necromancer looking for a quick buck.
Now you may be thinking "If this hypothetical place has magic, why wouldn't you just revive everyone who dies through a revival spell or something?" Well not everybody wants to live forever, now do they? There's gonna be graves for the people who decided it was finally their time. Or maybe capitalism made it so being revived costs more than it's worth to be revived in the first place. Imagine being in debt for life after JUST coming BACK to life.
Basically, necromancy is a good reason for not wanting magic in the real world.
20 notes · View notes
Text
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday once again stepped in to leave in place the federal government's ban on so-called "ghost guns." These are unassembled and unmarked guns that can be bought online and then assembled into fully operative guns.
In August 2022, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives issued regulations that required any such disassembled gun parts to carry serial numbers and required anyone buying them to pass a background check, in the same manner as in-person gun buyers. The gun manufacturers challenged the regulations in court, and Federal Judge Reed O'Connor in Texas issued a nationwide injunction barring the rule from going into effect.
The Supreme Court, however, blocked those decisions from going into effect, whereupon two of the manufacturers returned to Judge O'Connor's court and won an order barring the government from enforcing its regulations. The 5th Circuit upheld that order, too.
The government asked the high court to void, rather than just pause, the lower court rulings to send a message that lower courts should not "countermand" the high court's "authoritative determination."
Now the Supreme Court has once again repudiated the lower courts, voiding the lower court orders and allowing the ATF regulations to go into effect pending further litigation.
There were no noted dissents.
21 notes · View notes
reggie-gayflx · 8 months
Text
In the wake of another campus shooting, the University of North Carolina's student newspaper "The Daily Tar Heel" filled its front page with panicked text messages students sent while under lockdown revealing what it is really like to be a member of the "Run, Hide, Fight" generation.
Tumblr media
21 notes · View notes
shareyourideas · 2 months
Text
Understanding California Criminal Background Checks
5 notes · View notes
kp777 · 1 year
Text
youtube
Jon Stewart BREAKS THE INTERNET demolishing Republican TO HIS FACE
Brian Tyler Cohen
March 2, 2023
20 notes · View notes
fastkey · 1 month
Text
Streamlined background & financial screening for mortgage brokers, landlords, property managers and businesses!
2 notes · View notes
emperornorton47 · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
2 notes · View notes
penguinlover27 · 1 year
Link
Another step in the right direction! This time, from the governor of Michigan.
While this does not go as far as I would like to see done, I think that it and the actions taken by Tennessee’s governor are the start of a model of what should be uniformly implemented across all 50 states.
We can protect the right of people to protect themselves with firearms and still reduce the number of incidents of gun violence. These two aims are not in conflict. We can indeed preserve both the 2nd Amendment and public safety.
I am pleased to see some action finally being done after so many years of the NRA and the GOP forcing us to sit on our hands and hope that their “thoughts and prayers” would solve the problem.
Here’s to more discussion and debate, and more importantly, some concrete action towards addressing the public health emergency that is almost uniquely American. We can preserve our freedom, yet protect our population at the same time.
11 notes · View notes
sgrji · 8 months
Text
A Comprehensive Guide to Background Verification (BGV) in Today's World
In our increasingly interconnected and digitized world, the importance of ensuring the trustworthiness and credibility of individuals and entities has never been greater. Background Verification (BGV) plays a pivotal role in this process. From employment screenings to tenant checks, and even in the realm of cybersecurity, BGV is a critical tool used to evaluate the history and reliability of…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
2 notes · View notes
wardsutton · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Abbott speaking at the NRA Convention in Houston today, just days after the school shooting, inspired me to draw this.VOTE BETO, Texas!
35 notes · View notes
foreverthirty1 · 1 year
Text
Funny how the #1 indication of a mass shooter seems to be that EVERYONE WHO KNOWS THEM THOUGHT THEY MIGHT DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS gosh if only there were like a way to do something about that like some sort of check on their background or I dunno
3 notes · View notes
Text
Alabamians woke up Sunday with the right to carry a gun without a license.
The change, implemented by a state law passed last year, marked a major milestone: half of America’s 50 states now allow people to carry handguns without first seeking a permit.
Thirteen years ago, only two states — Vermont and Alaska — allowed its residents the unfettered right to carry a gun, relying on the Constitution’s Second Amendment as a blanket permit for all.
Since 2010, however, nearly two dozen states have followed suit, with 11 of them passing permitless carry laws in the last three years alone.
The growing movement has chalked up wins in state legislatures with remarkable speed, drawing cheers from gun rights advocates while raising fears among reformers that the changes will lead to more guns in the street — and likely more violence.
“If you are a law-abiding citizen, you should fully be able to exercise all of your constitutional rights,” said Andi Turner, legislative director for the Texas Rifle Association. “Half the states of the union are now recognizing it.”
Permit systems generally require applicants to demonstrate safe gun handling, as well as show knowledge of often-complicated gun laws and the use of lethal force.
“We’ve seen in the past decade a very concerted effort by the corporate gun lobby, especially the NRA,” said Nick Wilson, a gun violence researcher at the Center for American Progress. It has been a very successful campaign for the gun lobby. It helps their bottom line… But it’s very concerning to anyone worried about public safety.
The state legal changes have dovetailed with two other trends that auger well for gun advocates. First, the COVID-19 pandemic unleashed an unprecedented surge in sales. And second, people of color and women made up a larger share of the buyers, diversifying a gun-buying public that has traditionally skewed male, white and conservative.
Gun violence has also spiked since the pandemic began, with firearm deaths jumping 20% from 2019 to 2021, according to a recent study published by JAMA Network Open.
With big-ticket gun reforms like the Assault Weapons Ban or universal background checks stalled in Congress, the spate of state laws marks a defeat for the reform movement, which views the trend as a public security threat.
Sociological studies tend to show that increases in gun ownership generally track with increases in violence.
“It’s no coincidence that in states with very permissive approaches to guns in public, you have higher rates of gun death,” said Adam Skaggs, chief counsel for the Giffords Law Center, a nonpartisan reform group.
Over the last five years, researchers have increasingly shown that loosening restrictions on carrying handguns is also associated with problems like increased gun theft and road rage incidents, according to Stanford Law professor John Donohue.
Letting more people carry guns also impedes police work, Donohue said – partly from upticks in their caseloads of gun thefts and accidental shootings and partly because ramping up the risk of getting shot reduces police efficiency.
“One of the unintended consequences of putting more guns on the street is degrading police performance,” Donohue said. “You see clearance rates for all crimes drop when states move in the direction of letting more people carry guns.”
Tallying the number of states with permitless carry laws can exaggerate their reach, Skaggs noted. They tend to be small states with rural populations, while larger, more urban states like California and New York tend to favor a more restrictive approach toward firearms.
Just over one-third of Americans live in the 25 states embracing permitless carry.
And in the same way that gun rights groups have made speedy progress with permitless carry laws in red states, liberal-dominated legislatures have pushed opposing measures.
New York tightened its gun restrictions after last year’s mass shooting in Buffalo. Delaware enacted a state-level Assault Weapons Ban last year. A ballot measure passed last year by Oregon voters requires a permit for all gun purchases and restricts magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, though the law is tied up in the courts.
But the conservative-stacked Supreme Court’s landmark decision in the New York State Rifle and Pistol Co. v. Bruen case last year has also made it harder for state legislatures to keep people from carrying handguns. The ruling struck down a New York law that required applicants for concealed handgun licenses to demonstrate a specific need for carrying a weapon.
The ruling stopped short of scrapping permits for carrying handguns altogether, however.
“The opinion made very clear that there’s nothing in the Constitution that requires permitless carry,” Skaggs said. “Constitutional carry may sound good with its alliteration and the way it rolls off the tongue, but it’s fundamentally untrue and misleading. Guns in public have always been significantly regulated.”
Still, the Bruen decision could have major impacts on state-level gun debates, according to Mark Oliva, spokesman for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, the firearm industry trade group.
“Left-leaning and right-leaning states will probably become more polarized,” Oliva said. “And you’re going to keep seeing them go to the courts and say, ‘what’s the truth here?’ And if the truth follows what came out of Bruen, they’re going to find assault weapons bans are unconstitutional, magazine restrictions are unconstitutional, age restrictions and background checks for ammunition purchases are unconstitutional.”
States with permitless carry could become the majority before the year’s end.
Virginia Delegate Marie March (R) pre-filed a constitutional carry bill in November for this year’s legislative session. However, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis wants the issue prioritized when Florida lawmakers reconvene in April.
In Nebraska, a permitless carry bill failed to break the threshold for overcoming a filibuster in the state Senate last year by two votes. Nebraska Gov. Pete Ricketts (R) plans to try again this year.
63 notes · View notes
mr-entj · 1 year
Note
Hello,
I wanted to know if there are any specific companies I could hire to do a background check on myself ( I live in the U.S.A, if that helps). Thank you for your help!
Checkr
LexisNexis
GoodHire
3 notes · View notes
lunar-goodness · 1 year
Text
I just realized that when I was filling out the info for my background check for my new job, I completely forgot that I used to have a different last name. 😬 It changed when I was adopted when I was like 7-8 yrs old, how am I supposed to remember that far back? Hope that doesn’t fuck anything up!
2 notes · View notes
rhysands-rightknee · 2 years
Text
Sick and tired of these thoughts and prayers. Year after year. Keep telling yourself you’re not going to hell for prioritizing guns over children.
IT WAS THEIR LAST WEEK OF SCHOOL.
14 notes · View notes