#D-TOX (2002)
Text
W A T C H I N G
This movie was a financial failure, but it's my first time seeing it. AND it is very goddamn good!
Much of the supporting/ensemble cast are incredible, many have moved into be popularly known.
Shame that the film's failure lead to Stallone giving up on dramatic/thriller roles.
This movie was not given a fair shake by audiences or critics.
#EYE SEE YOU (2002)#D-TOX (2002)#SYLVESTER STALLONE#Tom Berenger#Charles S. Dutton#Polly Walker#Robert Patrick#Stephen Lang#Jeffrey Wright#Courtney B. Vance#Kris Kristofferson#psychological thriller#horror#Christopher Fulford#Angela Alvarado Rosa#Sean Patrick Flanery#Dina Meyer#Rance Howard#Robert Prosky#AC Peterson#thriller film#WATCHING
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Stephen Lang movies I've watched in 2023 (3/3):
Death In Texas (2021)
VFW (2019)
Pawn (2013)
Escape: Human Cargo (1998)
The Girl On The Train (2014)
D-Tox (2002)
Muzzle (2023)
49 notes
·
View notes
Text
Since youtube will not let me upload this due to copyright here are all the horror moments in the movie Eye See You/D-Tox (2002) which is technically a slasher movie even though I hardly see it classified as that. The ending death of the serial killer villain is great, full body stabbed TWICE and with a one liner movie title namedrop no less......
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Movies watched in April, 2022
FIRST VISIONS:
Banzai (1997). Directed by Carlo Vanzina
Don Camillo e i giovani d'oggi (1972). Directed by Mario Camerini
The A-Team (2010). Directed by Joe Carnahan
Doomsday (2008). Directed by Neil Marshall
Little Fockers (2010).Directed by Paul Weitz
Snakes on a Plane (2006). Directed by David R. Ellis
The Innkeepers (2011). Directed by Ti West
Land of the Dead (2005). Directed by George A. Romero
Lightning Strikes (2009). Directed by Gary Jones
The Void (2016). Directed by Jeremy Gillespie & Steven Kostanski
Seattle Superstorm (2012). Directed by Jason Bourque
Asteroid: Final Impact (2015). Directed by Jason Bourque
Dahmer (2002). Directed by David Jacobson
The Passion of the Christ (2004). Directed by Mel Gibson
Tropic Thunder (2008). Directed by Ben Stiller
What Dreams May Come (1998). Directed by Vincent Ward
Fauve (2018). Directed by Jeremy Comte
Tiger Boy (2012). Directed by Gabriele Mainetti
Until the End (2018). Directed by Giovanni Dota
Blended (2014). Directed by Frank Coraci
The Cobbler (2014). Directed by Tom McCarthy
Tunnel Rats (2008). Directed by Uwe Boll
The Godfather Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone (Director's Cut, 2020). Directed by F. F. Coppola
Intouchables (2011). Directed by Oliver Nakache & Éric Toledano
Peninsula (2020). Directed by Sang-ho Yeon
Pig (2021). Directed by Michael Sarnoski
REWATCHED:
The Visit (2015). Directed by M. Night Shyamalan
Nosferatu: Eine Symphonie des Grauens (1922). Directed by F. W. Murnau
The Strangers (2008).Directed by Bryan Bertino
Event Horizon (1997). Directed by Paul W. S. Anderson
A Few Good Men (1992). Directed by Rob Reiner
Train to Busan (2016). Directed by Sang-ho Yeon
D-Tox (2002). Directed by Jim Gillespie
The Exorciccio (1975). Directed by Ciccio Ingrassia
SPORT:
WrestleMania 38 (2022)
NWA/WCW - The Great American Bash (1986)
NWA Championship Wrestling - The Jim Crockett Promotions
TV SERIES:
The A-Team (1983 - 1987)
Battlestar Galactica (2004 - 2009)
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
NST #885: Eye See You (aka D-TOX, 2002)
The jittery opening credits of Eye See You (aka D-TOX; dir. Jim Gillespie, 2002) contain an obsessive variant of a string/collage board.
0 notes
Text
D-TOX- 2002 ⭐️⭐️
FBI Agent Jake Malloy (Sylvester Stallone) is hunting a vicious serial killer who has killed nine cops and counting. When he turns up at the latest crime scene he finds the killer is at his house killing his wife.
After drinking for months hes sent to a rehab in the middle of what looks like the Antartic.
A huge storm comes in trapping him and all the other cops in there. But as bodies start to pile up he realizes one of them must be the killer....
Film had a good start. Seemed promising. From the point he goes to the rehab though it all starts to suck. The new characters introduced are almost all either unrealistic or unlikable.
Its just dark and grimy and boring.
Although i did like a few of the kills. From when he gets to the rehab they actually start to happen onscreen and are less crime kills and more horror movie kills. I liked that.
Director Jim Gillespie has some experience there as his previous film was 1997s "i know what you did last summer".
D-Tox was a huge box office bomb losing nearly fifty million dollars.
0 notes
Photo
D-Tox (2002) ล่าเดือดนรก เจ้าหน้าที่เอฟ บี ไอ "เจ็ค มอลลี" (รับบทโดยซิลเวสเตอร์ สตอลโลน) เข้ารับการบำบัดในสถานบำบัดยาเสพติด สำหรับเจ้าหน้าที่ตำรวจด้วยอาการติดเหล้าอย่างหนัก เนื่องจากได้รับความกระทบกระเทือนทางจิต จากอาชญากรรมป่าเถื่อนที่เกิดขึ้นกับแฟนสาวของเขา ที่นั่นเขาจะต้องจัดการปลดเครื่องป้องกันตัวต่างๆ ออกเช่นเดียวกับเจ้าหน้าที่อื่นๆ รวมไปถึงพวกอุปกรณ์ต่างๆ ที่สามารถใช้เป็นอาวุธได้ ผู้ป่วยในสถานบำบัดต้องทนทุกข์ทรมาน เหี่ยวแห้ง และเผชิญกับอนาคตที่ไม่รู้ชะตากรรม สถานบำบัดแห่งนี้กลับกลายเป็นดังคุกมืด เมื่อพายุหิมะลูกใหญ่ได้ตัดขาดการสื่อสารต่างๆออกจากโลกภายนอก อากาศหนาวยะเยือกและผู้ป่วยเริ่มล้มตาย ท่ามกลางสถานการณ์อันคลุมเคลือ ทุกอย่างเริ่มคลี่คลายเมื่อฆาตกรตัวจริงปรากฎตัวขึ้นในหมู่ผู้ป่วย และหนึ่งในนั้นคงจะต้องเป็นเหยื่อรายต่อไป
0 notes
Text
Sean Patrick Flanery Movie Check List part 1 (1987 - 2008)
This took way too long to write up.
YIJ =Young Indiana Jones
[x] seen
A Tiger's Tail 1987 (as Sean Flanery)
Just Perfect 1990
My Life As A Babysitter 1990
The Accident 1993
Kingdom Come 1993
Guinevere 1994 [x]
YIJ: Hollywood Follies 1994
Frank & Jesse 1994
YIJ: Treasure of the Peacock's Eye 1995
YIJ: Attack of the Hawkmen 1995
The Grass Harp 1995
Raging Angels 1995
Powder 1995
YIJ: Travels with Father 1996
Just Your Luck 1996
The Method 1996 [x]
Eden 1996
Pale Saints 1997
Suicide Kings 1997 [x]
Best Men 1997 [x]
Girl 1998 [x]
Zack and Reba 1998
Simply Irresistible 1999
Body Shots 1999 [x]
YIJ: Spring Break Adventure 1999
YIJ: Adventures in the Secret Service 1999
YIJ: Daredevils of the Dessert 1999
YIJ: Tales of Innocence 1999
YIJ: Masks of Evil 1999
The Boondock Saints 1999 [x]
Run the Wild Fields 2000
Acceptable Risks 2001
Kiss The Bride 2002
Con Express 2002
D-Tox 2002
Lone Hero 2002
Borderline 2002
Then Came Jones 2003
Dead Lawyers 2004
The Gunman 2004
30 Days Until I'm Famous 2004
Demon Hunter 2005
Into The Fire 2005 [x]
The Insatiable 2006
Savage Planet 2006 [x]
Veritas, Prince of Truth 2007
Ten Inch Hero 2007 [x]
KAW 2007 [x]
No Game 2008
Crystal River 2008
Total: 11/50
8 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Eye See You will be released on Blu-ray on April 14 via MVD's Marquee Collection. In addition to the theatrical cut in high definition, it will include the never-before-seen original director’s cut, titled Detox, in standard definition.
Also known as D-Tox, the 2002 psychological thriller is based on Howard Swindle’s 1999 novel, Jitter Joint. Jim Gillespie (I Know What You Did Last Summer) directs from a script by Ron L. Brinkerhoff (The Guardian).
Sylvester Stallone stars with Tom Berenger, Charles S. Dutton, Sean Patrick Flanery, Dina Meyer, Robert Patrick, Robert Prosky, Courtney B. Vance, Polly Walker, Jeffrey Wright, and Kris Kristofferson.
Eye See You features 5.1 DTS-HD Surround and 2.0 (LCPM) audio options. Special features are listed below.
Special features:
Detox - Director’s cut (standard definition)
Interviews with actors Robert Patrick, Kris Kristofferson, Charles S. Dutton, Polly Draper, Robert Prosky, Christopher Fulford, Angela Alvarado Rosa, and Jeffrey Wright
8 deleted scenes
Photo gallery
Theatrical trailer
A brutal serial killer is targeting cops, and detective Jake Malloy (Sylvester Stallone) is on the warpath. But now the killer is making it personal, and this dedicated agent is twisted in an emotional nightmare. Time is running out, and so are the options, as Malloy engages in an extreme game of cat-and-mouse with a killer who won't be stopped.
#eye see you#d-tox#sylvester stallone#tom berenger#sean patrick flanery#dina meyer#charles s. dutton#robert patrick#robert prosky#mvd#dvd#gift#courtney b. vance#polly walker#jeffrey wright#kris kristofferson
6 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Actors in Star Trek you might’ve missed
Dina Meyer
In Star Trek Nemesis as commander Donatra. She has had starring roles in the films Johnny Mnemonic (1995), Dragonheart (1996), Starship Troopers (1997), Bats (1999), D-Tox (2002), and in the Saw movies.
1 note
·
View note
Photo
Eye See You/ D-Tox (2002)
Quick Stats:
Recommended if you want: a mystery reminiscent of the mistrust you feel while watching the Thing
Level of Attention needed: medium-high
If anything, watch it for: The finale
Overall: C-
HERE ARE MY THOUGHTS-
Eye see you is a dumb movie, I have to say I really had to force myself to keep watching it just so I could tick it off my list. I don't even want to waste my time reviewing it but this is the obligation I have set up for my self. This movie 100% relied on Stallone’s star power, the script was terrible, the policework in it 100% inaccurate. Inaccurate to the point where it took me out of the movie completely. the first act was boring, the second act was very very slow, and everything picked up in the last 20 minutes. I wish I could say it was a slow burn, but even with the very blunt and forced in exposition, you could blink and miss what was going on in the second half of the movie.
Overall it is clunky, I don't care about the characters at all, Stallone seems to be asleep throughout the movie and couldn’t even act like he really cared. The antagonist was the only life in the movie, and the energy was waste on a script like this. Don't watch Eye see you, you won't get this time back.
#eye#see#you#d-tox#movie#review#grade#c#bloody#gore#realistic horror#survival horror#white noise#my son
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Films watched in April, 2021
FIRST VISIONS
Return of the Seven (1966). Directed by Burt Kennedy
Il lungo giorno della violenza (aka: "El bandido Malpelo" / "The Bandit Malpelo"), (1971). Directed by Giuseppe Maria Scotese
Scoob! (2020). Directed by Tony Cervone
Emiliano Zapata (1970). Directed by Felipe Cazals
Che c'entriamo noi con la rivoluzione? (aka: "What Am I Doing in the Middle of a Revolution?" / "¡Qué nos importa la revolución!"), (1972). Directed by Sergio Corbucci
The Spongebob Movie: Sponge on the Run (2020). Directed by Tim Hill
D-Tox (2002). Directed by Jim Gillespie
Guns of the Magnificent Seven (1969). Directed by Paul Wendkos
La notte dei serpenti (aka: "La noche de los serpientes" / "Nest of Vipers"), (1969). Directed by Giulio Petroni
Un gallo con muchos huevos (aka: "A Brave Little Rooster"), (2015). Directed by Gabriel and Rodolfo Riva Palacio Alatriste, Melanie Simka
Us (2019). Directed by Jordan Peele
Dawn of the Dead (2004). Directed by Zack Snyder
Juanita (2019). Directed by Clark Johnson
Friendship (aka: "Dostana"), (1980). Directed by Raj Khosla
Kaala Patthar (aka: "Coal Mine" / "Black Stone"), (1979). Directed by Yash Chopra
REWATCHED
Jesus Christ Superstar (1973). Directed by Norman Jewison
Ben-Hur (1959). Directed by William Wyler
North by Northwest (1959). Directed by Alfred Hitchcock
From Dusk Till Dawn (1996). Directed by Robert Rodriguez
Silent Hill (2006). Directed by Christophe Gans
Emiliano Zapata (1970). Directed by Felipe Cazals
Batman Returns (1992). Directed by Tim Burton
Giù la testa (aka: "Duck You Sucker"), (1971). Directed by Sergio Leone
DOCUMENTARIES
The Storm That Swept Mexico (2011). Directed by Ray Telles
The UnXplained (2019 - )
Narco Wars (2020 - 2021)
TV SERIES
Them (2021 - )
Batman (1966 - 1968)
Glow (2017 - 2019)
Haunted (2018 - )
Haunted: Latin America (2021 - )
Ju-On: Origins (2020 - )
#movies watched in 2021#movies watched in april#april#first visions#rewatched#documentaries#tv series
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Cornucopia’s Take: Ghostwriting aside, industry funded science seeks answers to industry needs. Cornucopia calls for research on behalf of truth, accuracy, and all of us, rather than only corporate balance sheets.
Inside the Academic Journal That Corporations Love
Pacific Standard
by Paul D. Thacker
Source:
USACE Europe District
A recent Monsanto lawsuit opens a scary window into the industry of junk science.
A recent lawsuit against Monsanto offers a clear and troubling view into industry strategies that warp research for corporate gain. In a lawsuit regarding the possible carcinogenicity of the pesticide Roundup, plaintiffs’ lawyers suing Monsanto charge the company with ghostwriting an academic study finding that Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate, is not harmful. Glyphosate is the world’s most widely used weed killer and is critical for successful cultivation of genetically modified crops such as corn and soybean, which are resistant to the pesticide.
Ghostwriting remains pervasive in some areas of academic research; in 2010, I helped author a Senate report on the matter. Studies drafted by corporations and then published in scientific journals with academic authors have been used to sway government decisions, court cases, and even medical practice. A host of universities have been caught in ghostwriting scandals, including Harvard University, Brown University, Stanford University, and Emory University.
The study currently under scrutiny appeared in 2000 in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, the journal of the International Society of Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. On closer inspection, the ghostwriting charges seem unconvincing , and Science magazine reports that officials at one university have investigated and rejected the charges.
Monsanto has also strenuously denied the ghostwriting allegations and defends the integrity of the study on a blog: “The paper also underwent the journal’s rigorous peer review process before it was published.”
But the term “rigorous” is hardly an accurate description for the journal. Indeed, a glance into the journal’s history offers a telling window into the industry of creating and packaging junk science with the appearance of academic rigor.
“Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology is a vanity journal that publishes mercenary science created by polluters and producers of toxic chemicals to manufacture uncertainty about the science underlying public-health and environmental protections.” says David Michaels, professor of environmental and occupational health at the George Washington University School of Public Health. (Michaels recently returned to this position after serving as the administrator of the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration.)
The problem is that it’s not just Monsanto, and it’s not just this one journal. Corporations regularly buy academics to do their bidding, recasting industry talking points to create the beginnings of an alternative scientific canon.
The history here is long, and damning. In 2002, several academics and public-health activists sent a letter to Elsevier complaining that the journal lacked transparency and a conflicts-of-interest policy, and that it could not demonstrate editorial independence from corporate sponsors. A couple of years later, I began studying the ISRTP’s membership and journal, and combing through the minutes of the society’s meetings.
The year before the journal published the Roundup study, the society held its June 1999 council meeting in the Washington, D.C., office of Keller and Heckman, the chief law firm for the chemical industry. In a recent court case, for example, Keller and Heckman represented the Vinyl Institute in a lawsuit to roll back 2012 regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency limiting toxics emitted during PVC production. Keller and Heckman also bills itself as the premier law firm for the tobacco and e-vapor industries. The minutes from the June meeting note a member of Keller and Heckman attending along with representatives of several chemical industry trade associations. Minutes from February 2002 also record the meeting taking place in Keller and Heckman’s D.C. office and state that future meetings will also be held at the law firm.
“[I]t is unusual to see a regulatory toxicology journal run out of a law practice office!” says Dr. Lynn Goldman, dean of the Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University and one of the signatories on the 2002 letter.
“Having its meetings hosted by a corporate law firm is so obviously inappropriate — unless you aren’t so much a scientific society as a faux-science outlet for the corporate clients and funders of the journal’s authors,” says Jennifer Sass, a senior scientist who specializes in chemical policy at the Natural Resources Defense Council and is another of the 2002 letter signatories. After reviewing the Roundup study published in 2000, Sass says it doesn’t appear to be “what we normally call ghostwriting.” The study’s acknowledgement section, which is hidden behind the journal’s paywall, clearly notes Monsanto’s heavy involvement in the study’s science.*
“These people wouldn’t be able to stuff the scientific literature so successfully — muddying the waters and creating the false impression of controversy — if they didn’t have their go-to journals like Reg Tox Pharm,” she adds.
Examining the journal’s editorial board, Sheldon Krimsky, a professor at Tufts University who studies conflicts of interest and corporate influence on science, notes that industry consultants litter the journal’s masthead. Indeed, the journal’s editor is Gio Gori, a former consultant for the tobacco industry. In 1998, Gori partnered with Steven J. Milloy of JunkScience.com in a letter to Science magazine criticizing a story about tobacco consultants. I later outed Milloy in the New Republic for being on the payroll of the tobacco companies while writing articles for FoxNews.com that disparaged the science of second-hand smoke. And, in 2007, Gori published an op-ed in the Washington Post calling the science of second-hand smoke “bogus.”
Gori’s work for tobacco, Krimsky says, “places his credibility down at the bottom.”
Other controversial members of the journal’s editorial board include Michael L. Dourson and Dennis J. Paustenbach. Dourson is the president of TERA, a scientific consulting firm that was the subject of a 2014 investigation by Inside Climate News and the Center for Public Integrity highlighting the group’s cozy ties to industry. Documents made public during tobacco litigation note Dourson’s work for the industry.
When questioned about his tobacco consulting, Dourson said: “Jesus hung out with prostitutes and tax collectors. He had dinner with them.” He continued, “We’re an independent group that does the best science for all these things. Why should we exclude anyone that needs help?”
In 2005, the Wall Street Journal ran a front-page story questioning the role of Paustenbach and his company ChemRisk in a case that became the basis for the movie Erin Brockovich. According to the Journal, ChemRisk was hired to reanalyze data from a study that found chromium-contaminated groundwater linked with a range of public-health illnesses. Chemrisk’s reanalysis of data was then published in a new study under the names of two Chinese researchers without any mention of ChemRisk’s involvement, and was promoted for the next decade in court cases and regulatory filings. After the Journal article, the study was retracted, and environmental groups sought to have Paustenbach censured by the Society of Toxicology.
Seven years later, the Chicago Tribune wrote an investigative story critical of Paustenbach’s work for the chemical industry on flame retardants, and the Center for Public Integrity published an investigation last year noting Paustenbach’s work for Ford Motor Company to downplay the dangers of asbestos in car brake pads.
“This might be a kind of a rogue journal that looks like a journal,” Krimsky says.
The problem is that it’s not just Monsanto, and it’s not just this one journal. Corporations regularly buy academics to do their bidding, recasting industry talking points to create the beginnings of an alternative scientific canon. Universities do little to stop it, while academic journals, sometimes prestigious, are often complicit. Perhaps public shame remains the most — or only — effective medicine.
https://www.cornucopia.org/2017/04/science-bought-paid/
[note Bayer has since bought Monsanto’s; yes the Bayer company of Nazi Germany]
Five things to know about Bayer and Monsanto
August 13, 2018
Five things to know about Bayer and Monsanto
by Michelle Fitzpatrick
A cancer victim's surprise court victory over US pesticide maker Monsanto could open the floodgates to a slew of similar lawsuits, potentially leaving the firm's new German owner with a major case of buyer's remorse.
From the toxic legacy of Monsanto's Roundup weedkiller to fears about its use of genetically modified seeds, here's what you need to know about the $63-billion (55-billion-euro) merger between Bayer and Monsanto.
Heroin
Founded in Germany in 1863, Bayer is still best known for making aspirin. More infamously, it briefly sold heroin in the early 20th century, marketed as a cough cure and morphine substitute.
During World War II, Bayer was part of a consortium called IG Farben that made the Zyklon B pesticide used in Adolf Hitler's gas chambers.
Through a series of acquisitions over the years, Bayer has grown into a drug and chemicals behemoth and now employs some 100,000 people worldwide.
Agent Orange
Monsanto was established in St. Louis, Missouri in 1901, setting out to make saccharine.
By the 1940s, it was producing farm-oriented chemicals, including herbicide 2,4-D which, combined with another dangerous chemical was used to make the notorious Vietnam War-era defoliant Agent Orange.
In 1976, the company launched probably its best-known product, the weed killer Roundup.
In the 1980s, its scientists were the first to genetically modify a plant cell. Monsanto then started buying other seed companies and began field trials of GM seeds.
It eventually developed soybean, corn, cotton and other crops engineered to be tolerant of Roundup.
Goodbye 'Monsatan'
Dubbed "Monsatan" and "Mutanto", the US firm has for decades been in the crosshairs of environmentalists, especially in Europe, who believe that GM food could be unsafe to eat.
Campaigners also abhor Monsanto's production of glyphosate-based Roundup, which some scientists have linked to cancer although other studies dispute this.
Hoping to ditch Monsanto's poisonous reputation, Bayer has said it plans to drop the company's name from its products.
But Friends of the Earth, which has dubbed the merger a "marriage made in hell", said it would simply switch its protests to Bayer so long as it continues Monsanto's practices.
Another complaint about the latest consolidation in the industry is that it leaves the global seeds and pesticides market in the hands of just a few players—potentially pushing up prices and limiting choices for farmers and consumers.
Hello, lawsuits?
A California jury last week ordered Monsanto to pay nearly $290 million in damages to a dying groundskeeper after finding that the company failed to warn him that using Roundup products might cause cancer.
Observers say the landmark win by Dewayne Johnson, who has non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, could pave the way for thousands of cases against Monsanto.
Bayer's share price plunged more than 10 percent in response.
Monsanto has vowed to appeal the ruling, while Bayer insisted that herbicides containing glyphosate are "safe".
Analyst Michael Leacock of MainFirst bank said the legal setback was "an unlucky outcome" for Bayer just two months after sealing the takeover.
"It is highly likely that investors will take a very dim view of the recent deal," he said.
High price to pay
In an industry preparing for a global population surge with many more mouths to feed, Bayer was keen to get its hands on Monsanto's market-leading line in GM crop seeds designed to resist strong pesticides like Roundup.
It was also lured by Monsanto's data analytics business Climate Corp, believing farmers will in future rely on digital monitoring of their crops.
But the takeover, one of the largest ever by a German firm, comes at a high cost.
As well as the eye-watering price tag, Bayer had to give up much of its seeds and agrichemical business to satisfy competition concerns.
Those divestitures have gone to none other than Bayer's homegrown rival BASF, the unexpected beneficiary of the mammoth deal.
And following the California court verdict, Bayer may now have to set aside huge sums to settle future Roundup claims.
"The total cost, in our view, could easily reach $10 billion" if Bayer were to settle with a still larger number of plaintiffs, said Leacock.
Explore further
Bayer shares plunge after Monsanto cancer ruling
0 notes
Photo
D-Tox (2002) Directed by Jim Gillespie
3 notes
·
View notes
Last Seen Blogs
uppervillagespa
Upper Village Spa
maopow
..・゜✭MAO✫・゜・..
themalteser
Malt's Reference Emporium
avatarblush
charly
dnadidid-blog
Untitled