Tumgik
#What does that pose even mean??
Text
POV: You're Jessica Drew.
You're trying to do your job. You go to check on your students.
You see Diane. She's laughing. She's laughing so hard she's in tears. She can barely speak. Borderline scream-laughing. In all honesty she's losing her fucking mind
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
You ask her what's wrong, what could be that funny? She points. You turn around.
It's just Hobie doing whatever the fuck this is
Tumblr media
She's on the floor. She's begging him to stop, the laughing is too much. He just continues doing whatever the hell it is that he's doing. Really, you're not sure what he's doing. Or what's funny.
You tell him to knock it off. He ignores you. You stare at the two of them.
You leave them to it.
90 notes · View notes
dailyedgeworth · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
today, happy destiel day to all those who celebrate, here's a gooey (and non) edgeworth
165 notes · View notes
oflgtfol · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
quick like 3 hour thing to sate my desire to see Narinder But As A Bishop. i tried to emulate the game style as much as possible, and i used shamura and heket as the primary references for the robe design
72 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
Yeah, that elevator sure got Monty. 
Banged him up real good
2K notes · View notes
s1ithers · 7 months
Text
wish i knew the forgotten realms lore better...how am i meant to make my little ocs in this state of ignorance
#i'm so interested in how people relate to the gods in this world which is sort of hard to glean from the wiki#thinking abt those notes in the ilmater temple - 'even bhaal has things to teach us 😔🙏' otoh but the absolute cult is 'heresy'#like who decides that? what does heresy /mean/ in this polytheistic setup where each god's cult seems to p much do their own thing#& it seems like even among the good-aligned gods ppl tend to pick one to hitch their wagon to in a pretty committed way#what does polytheism mean to the average joe in this world#i need to know#i need to make a little guy about it#wrapped up shadowheart's quest and....idk man!#just going off the lore as presented in bg3 so far it's set up distrust for deities pretty much across the board#like babe is your new cult better? bc they've got angel imagery? i guess so#the whole problem of evil thing - the dead three shar et al being so extant & active in the world makes the (apparently?) more distant#benevolence of good gods pretty limp by comparison#so much of what draws lay people to them seems to be protection from the very real material threat posed by the evil ones?#& at least SH is in a better place to choose than say. the goblins#vast swathes of people just born under a bad sign in this world#i heard somewhere that if you don't get a god to claim your soul for their afterlife it just kind of withers away in limbo for eternity?#kinda fucked up#some protection racket shit dude#being a mortal in FR like you're just a little guy in a precarious cosmological situation aren't u#to be clear none of this is a criticism i think it's very fun & chewy#rife with cosmic horror potential#bg3#bg3 spoilers#edit: i mean it's a little bit of a criticism in that i don't think the game sells SH's conversion super well#if the intention is just to be like. yay white-hat god good ^_^#but i don't hate the worldbuilding implications if we take the iffiness as read
33 notes · View notes
anghraine · 1 year
Text
A more coherent part of the adaptation+Darcy post I was threatening to release from drafts purgatory:
While I think all adaptations' versions of Darcy are pretty bad at representing Austen's character, though sometimes compelling in their own right, I think the various choices made are all ways of addressing the same problem with the character as written.
It's not a problem in the novel—indeed, I'd say it's a remarkable achievement there—but I think we don't always realize how extremely ambiguous the presentation of Darcy is through the first half of the novel. It's easy to read him as basically hostile because he was when he first appeared and because Elizabeth, our smart, likable POV character, gets stuck in that perception of him for half the book. So it's only on re-reading that most audiences realize Elizabeth drastically misread his real feelings and the original interpretation of his manner is thrown into question, at the very least.
But as I said in the other post, Austen plays fair: it is entirely possible to realize that Elizabeth is mistaken about some things (esp about how he feels towards her), it is possible to realize that particularly observant characters find his expressions and behavior difficult to interpret, it's possible to notice that we are rarely told how he's speaking or smiling, and scenes typically cut off before we can be told. And it's possible to notice the many issues with Wickham's account of him.
But it's also entirely possible to read everything he says and does as Elizabeth does, and the narrative gently encourages us to do so without often committing to actual description that would guide us in those ambiguous scenes. Austen might have, for instance, described his smiles in the Netherfield scenes as contemptuous, polite, or pleasant. But she just repeats that he's smiling while drawing very little attention to the fact and rarely committing to an indication of what his smiles or presentation of dialogue are like. So it's mostly up to us to decide, with the occasional (dubious in some respects) interpretation from Elizabeth.
And we're likely to reach different conclusions on re-reading—the earlier presentation of Darcy rewards re-reading a lot, because a lot of the time, we don't even realize how much we're not being told until the letter or even the Pemberley scenes, where Elizabeth identifies the smile we saw in his earlier scenes as the same one in the painting done during his beloved father's lifetime—making, say, the "contemptuous" reading very unlikely.
Now, getting away with that level of ambiguity and obscuring that the ambiguity is happening in the first place, as Austen manages to do in the novel, is both impressive and a hell of a lot harder in visual form. Not impossible! But if we see and hear him ourselves we're less likely to form judgments shaped by Austen's tricks of narration and Elizabeth's POV, and this typically involves commitment to a particular aspect of his presentation in the novel.
And if you think about it, the four major adaptations of Darcy are essentially committing to some part of his depiction.
Laurence Olivier's Darcy is smiling, witty, and charismatic—which are a part of his personality, but skewed so far out of proportion that he's virtually unrecognizable. And there's no attempt to obscure his place in the narrative as the actual love interest (I assume because duh, it's Laurence Olivier—but it was a pretty unrewarding role for him as written).
David Rintoul's Darcy is (in)famously "robotic"—the 1980 version of him leans into the withdrawn, inexpressive, difficult to read but clearly uncomfortable version of Darcy. The smiles in the earlier part tend to be tight, a matter of form, and/or unconvincing, by contrast to the later Darcy's comportment towards the Gardiners and Elizabeth, esp after the second proposal.
Colin Firth's Darcy is, well—okay, I'm biased because of my intense dislike for the 1995 production, but I do think it's also struggling with the same issue, but responds in the opposite way as the 1980. Where the 1980 tried to replicate the ambiguity in a way that retained Darcy's tendency towards a certain severity and dignity and mostly ended up at expressionless, the 1995 transforms it into visibly intense, sexualized brooding. This is coupled with Elizabeth's perception of Darcy's hostility being much more validated than in the novel; he snaps at her, most of his textual smiles are removed, even his letter is rearranged with an eye to half-dressed angst rather than the subtle charity of the omitted "God bless you", and generally his angst and passion!!! are played up rather than down ("I shall conquer this!!" / the melodramatic pond dive and shift in focus from Elizabeth's shame to Darcy being barely dressed / Darcy being grim in London, etc).
If the 1995 version of Darcy commits to Darcy's behavior being largely how Elizabeth sees it, the 2005 drastically reverses that. Matthew Macfadyen's Darcy is also struggling with passion, but tbh he seems like he's kind of struggling with everything. He's visibly consumed with anxiety, he's obviously shy where Darcy has to explain his discomfort or experience it as a POV character in the novel, he seems sweet despite occasional classism, and at times his arc seems more about learning to relax than anything else. That is, instead of representing Darcy as more or less accurately seen by Elizabeth, it leans into emphasizing the extent of her misunderstanding, with Darcy's behavior both more sympathetic than she sees it and clearly comprehensible if she weren't so biased against him (fwiw, The Lizzie Bennet Diaries also emphasizes Elizabeth's misjudgment to a considerable extent and deals with the ambiguity by keeping him literally offstage).
The point of all this is that there is a core issue of adaptation here—the difficulty of representing subtle novelistic ambiguity while making Darcy emotionally compelling at the same time. Adapted Darcys are often given extra scenes, altered dialogue, or (where described in the novel) altered mannerisms/emotions to try and achieve this. And all lean so hard into the aspect they choose to emphasize that they tend to sacrifice most of the rest of his personality to the interpretation they're committing to, and his feelings for Elizabeth tend to be incredibly obvious to the point that it sometimes strains belief that she wouldn't see them, even with all her investment in not seeing them.
I guess the thing is that I think just stopping with "this is an issue of the different media and can't be represented on film" is boring and underestimates the potential of film as a medium. There are plenty of performances that can only be fully appreciated on re-watching or re-listening to something with a fuller knowledge of what is revealed later. And to some degree, the adapters do have to choose how much they want to incorporate Elizabeth's perception of Darcy vs the bare narrative and what they're willing to give away about him to preserve what seems most important.
These are all active choices with actual significance, IMO. They imply priorities about the production and their production's take on Darcy that are intriguing in a way that gets lost by just giving them a free pass by way of the challenge of the medium.
182 notes · View notes
necrobain · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
anotha one from a few months ago. can you guys tell i love him
13 notes · View notes
kicktwine · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
this is the result of too many thought trains colliding at once so like - s. sorry paranatural likers. I only had one cool idea all day and it was to turn King C into a spirit fusion hostile takeover gundam situation
like this (very rough wip gif under the cut)
Tumblr media
60 notes · View notes
Text
hottake but r.enee r.app actually wasn't that good in the new m.ean girls movie musical - y'all are just attracted to her
5 notes · View notes
hauntingblue · 2 months
Text
Just thought about something for a second: shanks is so fucking sketchy. He warned shirohige about blackbeard and to stop ace and look at what happened. Also now he is talking to the gorusei about luffy (probably about his fruit (joyboy/nika if I assume right) bc he was the one who found it) and now imu is after him, shirahoshi (poseidon) and vivi (who knows something about the weapon mariejoa holds bc of her family's history with the place), blackbeard is still a menace but because of having two fruits or because of being a d? Both? And what does that make him a menace at ancestral weapon level (like the others)? I have so many questions. Why does shanks like luffy but still warns the gorusei about him. Why do they respect him. Why did they let him stop marineford. Why is he so powerful. Why is he a yonkou. Shanks is key to all this and I DON'T KNOW WHY
#went on a bender here. welcome to my twisted mind#its 2am WHATEVER#talking tag#watching one piece#i just started wano I know about joyboy bc that is inescapable but THAT'S IT and i don't wanna know more so shhh#i really need to make my corkboard.... i really do#actually i might go on another bender here; pluton is the god of the underworld and imo its adam the boat (makes sense bc tom has its plans#and he and his family are from gyojin island so they passed them down thru generations) and it's the boat that will carry the gyojin to the#surface#now shirahoshi is poseidon which can tell the sea beasts to carry the boat to the surface#now luffy is joyboy who promised something (to carry the gyojin to the surface?) to the previous poseidon#but joyboy is nika who is the sun who is in the sky. so now we have the underwold (adam/pluton). the sea (poseidon) and the sky (nika)#and luffy is nika but then the weapon in mariejoa is the strawhat??? I MEAN YES BUT HOW DOES LUFFY GET IT LMAO bc its just his fruit right?#does he even need it? is it just a represetation bc it went missing?#and what does vivi have to do with this#AND DID SHANKS GET THE GUM GUM FRUIT FOR THE GOVERNMENT BC THEY WERE SEARCHING FOR IT AND NEW ABOUT JOYBOY/NIKA#AND HE IS JUST A GOVERNMENT ARM POSING AS A PIRATE????? but then the government must have known about the fruit and shanks doesnt#need to tell them.... or maybe he hid the gum gum fruit was the one with nika in it and is now telling the truth to them....#if it even works like that...#shanks being so well off bc he is affiliated with the gov makes too much sense bc we havent seen how strong he is apart from the haki....#and every yonkou is just weirdly born to never die or something#you know this is so bad bc i havent seen the last movie about shankd bc you know i am not that far yet so i am just throwing spaghetti to a#wall and seeing what sticks but like if there wasn't even a wall there#ALSO robin is gonna get her THREE poneglyphs in wano!!! I NEED TO KNOW WHAT THEY SAY#pulling threads#<- literally#pulling strings
4 notes · View notes
queenofzan · 2 months
Text
a: the overwhelming amount of people in US prisons are there for non-violent offenses
b: even the ones who aren't still are people? they still have rights? it is unacceptable to strip them of rights that aren't even remotely related to public safety?
2 notes · View notes
cyber-bunnie · 2 months
Text
Tbh is it bad that I don't like sending nudes unless the person has seen me irl first?
5 notes · View notes
astrohaterz · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
faces. from the face drawer
5 notes · View notes
bumblingbabooshka · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media
Tuvok and B’Elanna being adorable - More like Best Case Scenario amiright?
#Tuvok#B'Elanna#tuvok cam#HEHEHEHE guy who is annoyed and girl who is excited#she'ssooocute <3 romance girl#Tom: And what if Janeway was EVIL??? / Tuvok: I'll kill you.#Tuvok is so annoying I lovehimIlovehimIlovehim#Tuvok: I'm not going to write this v_v -sees Tom is writing it- You're writing it WRONG. I'm going to help you since you're so awful.#Neelix: I have a comment about the Neelix character.#Tuvok: How Surprising. =_= <- literally just blatant sarcasm <3<3 not even coded or oblique#HHHEE TUVOK YOU WROTE HIM SO MEANLY PLEASE#Tuvok: -having just written Neelix as a coward with no morals willing to betray anyone at the first sign of trouble- What's the issue??#Veeery in character Tuvok hHEHEHE...no personal bias there at all#no personal bias in the fact you wrote Chakotay being more mad about you then about Janeway either I'm SURE <3#early seasons Voyager my beloved I love how they're just fucking goofing around up there#'Need I Remind You - That It Was /I/ Who First Began The Scenario?' hehehe Tom PLEASE let Tuvok play with you you're being so mean~!!!#Tuvok: We need to make a detailed outline of the next chapters v_v / Tom: I'm just gonna make it up.#Tuvok: WE CANNOT PROCEED WITHOUT A CAREFULLY CONSTRUCTED OUTLINE. <- autism moments. Make an OUTLINE. TOM.#he does a funny thing with his hands after Tom refuses again to let him work on the holodeck - it looks almost like he tries to#do his meditative pose but then remembers he's holding his PADD and stops....autism moments#Tom and Tuvok fighting like kids is so funny. When Tom tries to write more and Tuvok's LOCKED it HEHEHEHH#SNRKEHEHEHEHEH TAND THEN SESKA SHOWS UP!!! Ohmygoodness...Ifucking love this it's so unserious#They should have kept Seska as an ongoing like scooby doo villain where halfway through any given episode she just suddenly pulled off a#rubber mask or stepped out from behind a pillar like IT WAS ME. SESKA >D and everyone's increasingly annoyed about it#they'rel ikeohhhhmygodit's Seska AGAIN -_-#like she just gets less and less intimidating even though she IS trying to kill them everytime and she almost succeeds everytime#st voyager
9 notes · View notes
theonlyadawong · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
when this scene came up in the trailer i remember thinking "huh she looks kinda demure, or like she's hiding herself behind the case" (because I thought this was going to come up after the helicopter scene, so I thought it was the briefcase with the amber)... it's a fucking gun lmao
4 notes · View notes
grahamcarmen · 1 year
Text
redcrackleweek Day 2: Slice of life
Tumblr media Tumblr media
16 notes · View notes