always and forever love and cherish annabeth chase for proving to my 14-year-old self that being a super-intelligent badass that people admire and look up to can co-exist with the part of you that is upset and insanely jealous when you find out that your best friend and boy you've been in love with since you were 12 is friends with other girls.
because fr she watches him stand there like a dead fish while this rando writes her number on his hand, says it's fine, and then replies with one-syllable answers every time he tries to talk to her for like a whole 24 hours.
he's out here acting like he doesn't even want to know this girl, and she's out here like fine, if you know another girl what if i'm just super rude to her and then don't talk to you for the rest of your life. what then?
the best part is that she's so mad at him because he knows other girls, and then mad at herself for being mad at him for knowing other girls and he's so oblivious as to why she's mad because to him she's the only girl ever.
430 notes
·
View notes
hi is this blog chill with loveless and heartless aros
Yeah, it is! I don't personally identify as heartless or loveless, but I at the very least am aware of these identities on the aro spectrum and honestly, I'd be happy to learn more – either through shared experience or getting informed on my end!
tl;dr: absolutely. This blog is chill with p'much most people, honestly, except exclusionists, bigots and bullies overall.
83 notes
·
View notes
Truly I have been hardwired by having tumblr throughout my teen years and into adulthood to look for every single gay shipping opportunity no matter what. Often when it's not even there. I literally cannot turn this part of my brain off that begins looking for conspiracy-level reasons that the thing I'm watching is actually gay.
And like, I wonder what future generations will be like?
If you have real actual queer rep as a kid do you still spend all your time imagining it with your friends? Or is this particular brand of deranged a tumblr-specific thing?
I have no regrets. We had crumbs and made ourselves feasts in any way we could.
Anyway, this is just to say that I am not yet three seasons in to the 1980s absurdist British sci-fi comedy Red Dwarf about two chicken soup machine repairmen and a man-cat stranded alone in space and I am literally unable to stop my brain from forming an earnest and rabid argument for why the chicken soup repairmen are in the midst of an enemies to lovers arc. One of them is dead and a hologram. It doesn't matter. They are going to fall in love. I know it.
90 notes
·
View notes
I'm confused about the "300 years" bit in the myths of Zeus and Hera. Was is that he desired her for all that time or that they had a "honeymoon phase"? How do you like to interpret it?
I'd say the first variant is more likely. I have often seen it claimed that their wedding night or "honeymoon" lasted for 300 years, but I don't think the few sources we have on the subject support such a reading. Here are the references:, first a fragment from Kallimachos’ Aitia and then a passage from the Dionysiaca of Nonnos:
"Zeus loved (Hera) passionately for three hundred years.”; alternative translation: “Zeus desired (Hera) eagerly for three hundred years.” (attributed to Kallimachos, quoted in the scholia to Iliad 1.609);
"I (Aphrodite) joined Zeus in wedlock with Hera his sister, after he had felt the pangs of long-lasting desire and desired her for three hundred years." (Nonnos, Dionysiaca 41.263).
So yes, it seems to refer to Zeus desiring Hera for all that time. The Dionysiaca passage speaks for itself and it’s as unambiguous as it gets in placing the 300 year period before the marriage, but the Kallimachian fragment is more ambiguous.. The main issue with it is that it was quoted in the Iliad scholia, and since I don't have access to it and thus I can't know the context in which the passage was mentioned with any certainty, I can only base my understanding of it on what various scholars say on the subject. So it seems that this, too, is a reference to a period before their marriage, to premarital sex and apparently it is even linked to the conception of Hephaistos, explaining why he is disabled. Here are some examples of how various scholars describe the situation based on these ancient commentaries:
"Most of the local legends and rites that are recorded in connection with the divine union refer to the first prenuptial intercourse between Zeus and Hera rather than to their wedding. It was claimed, indeed, on Samos that the pair had first slept together on that island in utter secrecy for three hundred years." (Robin Hard, The Routledge Handbook of Greek Mythology).
"Parthenos and Pais, "virgin" and "girl," in the Hera myth by no means had the simple meaning of being without a man, without the brother-husband! Rather these names meant secret love-making with him, such as Homer knew about and was the subject of a special tradition in Samos. There it was related that this condition lasted for three hundred years." (Karl Kerényi, Zeus and Hera: Archetypal Image of Father, Husband, and Wife)
A scholion to the Iliad gives a clear summary of the situation: the ancient commentator first mentions the youthful passion of Zeus and Hera . . . . . According to this scholion, Zeus fell in love with Hera at the time when the children of Kronos aspired to seize their father’s power; then, at the end of the Titanomachy, Zeus and Hera received the basileia together.” (V. Pirenne-Delforge & G. Pironti, The Hera of Zeus: Intimate Enemy, Ultimate Spouse)
"When we turn for help to the Iliad scholia for 14.295-96, we are offered two stories. . . . The second tale (bT) relates that, after Kronos had been sent down to Tartaros, Hera was betrothed (as a presumed virgin) to Zeus by Okeanos and Tethys but promptly gave birth to Hephaistos, having anticipated her marriage by lying with Zeus in secret on the island of Samos; to cover the deed, she claimed that the birth was without benefit of intercourse (cf. SA II 1.609)." (Timothy Gantz, Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources).
Personally, since I’m very fond of the idea that Zeus and Hera had a sexual/romantic relationship long before they got married, I’m interpreting this 300 year period to be the amount of time they kept their relationship secret. Now as for why they would need to do such a thing, that is a topic needing its own post.
3 notes
·
View notes