Tumgik
#imperial core
thoughtportal · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
28 notes · View notes
butchgtow · 16 days
Text
Finance and math-minded, anti-authoritarian, upper class and upper middle class (capable of more hastily breaking the classist glass ceiling), USAmerican women must pursue entry into U.S. Federal Reserve roles. The capability of USAmerican women and family units including girls to financially organize to leave the United States is likely to soon be materially, via indirect policy and "many decisions on individual case basis" of the Reserve, challenged. It is already, currently, fully legal for the Reserve to do so with complete confidentiality.
Gen Z and A USAmerican women from upper middle class to upper class backgrounds entering university, study finance and related subjects. Compete to and join your most prestigious financial student organizations, available internships and co-ops. Participate in data-oriented and finance-oriented hackathons.
Control of the U.S. dollar is already weaponized against you by the Reserve and by creditors. With alt-right (across wealth classes) flooding pollwork up to public offices, the public sector will be weaponized more strongly against you than it has been in decades.
Seizing of the Reserve by women must occur as rapidly as possible.
youtube
13 notes · View notes
hussyknee · 4 months
Text
Over and over I am reminded that institutionalized academia is a pillar of white supremacy. Expertise built on the exclusion of the colonized and disabled for the purpose of propagating colonial, eugenicist structures and rationalizations. Decolonial academia has become just an excuse to study us like bugs under a microscope and speak over us, rather than treat us as experts of our own reality and oppressions.
15 notes · View notes
slicedblackolives · 6 months
Text
in the grand scheme of things it is a very small point and probably down to survey methodology and sampling error but i still cannot get over that the majority of republicans want a ceasefire in gaza. these are, statistically, people who voted from trump. they're probably white and over 30 and evangelical and remember 9/11 and the subsequent propganda. and they have a political belief that is considered by western institutions radical leftist enough to invite parliamentary censure, deportation, and the loss of university housing. 56% of registered republicans.
16 notes · View notes
dougielombax · 7 months
Text
Imperial core?!
What the fuck does that mean?!
What are we living in? Fucking Star Wars?
3 notes · View notes
eskildit · 10 months
Text
i think a lot about hot sauce and jeannemary. two young girls so ready to kill and to die. a comparison made all the worse when you recall that hot sauce lost all her family to the cohort, that she can specifically recall fourth style necromancy (using corpses as bombs). a fourteen and thirteen year old that could easily have been on opposite sides of the same front line. 
878 notes · View notes
chimaerakitten · 11 days
Text
Reading the Scholomance trilogy for the first time fresh off a Temeraire reread really feels like Naomi Novik grabbing you by the shoulders and saying, “I hope you were taking notes during those nine books about the horrors of imperialism because I've got a new angle and we're taking it from the top.”
123 notes · View notes
psychotrenny · 1 month
Text
When Liberals describe a piece of media dealing with contemporary war or politics as being "Morally Ambiguous" they mean nearly always mean that it questions the specific decisions of those in power, not the basic ideological assumptions that their power rests upon. Like it's always "Was it a good idea to invade this tyrannical terrorist shithole in order to spread freedom and democracy?" or "Is it okay to torture evil terrorists shitheads to save people from their oppression", never questioning whether the US actually are protecting the innocent and spreading prosperity or if their enemies really are straightforwardly sadistic oppressors. It may question whether the US is acting like a good guy, but it always affirms that the US inherently is good or at least has the greatest capacity to be. Even in Liberal media where the doesn't come off looking the best, they still make sure to present their enemies as even worse. Not to mention the way that any atrocities the US does commit are presented as either mistakes, malicious perversions of the system (probably orchestrated by enemy infiltrators anyway) or tragic but necessary evils. Meanwhile the atrocities committed by their foes are the proof of their innate evil and strong necessity of stopping them; this is the basis of that whole discussion around whether terrible means should be adopted to achieve the noble end of defeating these villains.
And like a story apparently "isn't making a political statement" when it doesn't give a clear answer on these terms, but the terms themselves are never up for discussion. Like I heard someone call Call of Duty: Modern Warfare "apolitical" because it neither justifies nor condemns stuff like those SAS soldiers torturing Arabs and killing sleeping or unarmed Russians (leaving it for the player to decide oooooooooh sooooo deep), as though its choice of antagonists and decision to present them as unambiguously evil isn't a statement in of itself. And like its choice to give Soviet imagery to the Russian Ultranationlists is apparently just a silly oversight (like ooooh real Ultranationalists hate those Soviet lefties hahaha) that says nothing at all about the creator's view of international politics and anti-US ideologies.
As far as your average Liberal is concerned, media contains political statements are when a character turns directly to the camera and says "This thing is good/bad". Anything else is deep stuff that makes you think and lets you come to your own conclusions. Just play the game, don't worry about who set the rules
111 notes · View notes
jacksoldsideblog · 7 months
Text
fight club only works in the 90s because if the narrator and tyler durden existed in the era of amazon and constant surveillance they would've committed much larger crimes much faster with the desperation of a man who knows its all hopeless
157 notes · View notes
thoughtportal · 2 months
Text
Murphy – a song for aaron bushnell Aaron Bushnell 2/25/98 -2/25/24
10 notes · View notes
butchgtow · 2 months
Text
one of the most effective means of ending the digitization of socioeconomic systems of discrimination in the U.S. would have been to boycott Citigroup and its subsidiaries + Citadel LLC and its subsidiaries.
2 notes · View notes
txttletale · 9 months
Note
If a genocide is being committed and I am the president of a large military power to the extent where it is feasible for me to just... stop that genocide if only temporarily via military means should I do it? How should these type of extreme situations be handled in general ? Sincerely asking for your opinion txt . Much thanks
this is an understandable question but it is also fundamentally malformed--built upon unspoken premises that are incorrect. imperialist nations, with the power and resources to conduct large-scale global military interventions, are specific structures that are built in specific ways. much like any other organization, they are self-filtering. you cannot become the president of the united states of america if you genuinely believe that the purpose of the united states military is anything other than to enrich the usamerican bourgeoisie (or, in sanitized language, 'protect usamerican interests').
similarly, just like any tools, militaries are not neutral and all-purpose. the usamerican military has over centuries been built as a resource-extraction and violence apparatus. saying 'the imperial powers should use their militaries to enforce peace and safety for oppressed peoples' is like saying 'i'm going to cook my soup with this gun' -- it can't do that. it is not an apparatus capable of doing that and to become one it would have to be transformed to an unrecognizable degree.
so the answer to your question is: this is a pure thought experiment. military power cannot be (to paraphrase a lenin quote i love so very much) taken alone, but rather must be 'taken together' when considering to what applications it 'can' or 'should' be used. this question is much like saying 'if i have a missile launcher, should i use it to cook food for the hungry?' where giving any answer at all surrenders to the absurdity of the question.
285 notes · View notes
comradekatara · 5 months
Text
chan and ruon-jian are such good characters because they’re literally just these privileged teenagers living in the imperial core, summering in their beach houses, sheltered from the realities of the atrocities being committed by their own fathers. they know that their fathers are a big deal due to their military rank, but they are disturbed and off-put by even the most distant allusion to the realities of the war because they can only imagine the war in abstract terms of prestige and glory. they are two dimensional caricatures of the popular jock archetype—a white, suburban, american construction. they are completely hollow characters, lacking any substance beyond what they materially represent to azula and zuko. and isn’t that just so apt?
75 notes · View notes
baeddling · 7 months
Text
People on tumblr hate the idea that just bc someone is oppressed in one way doesn't mean they are incapable of holding other privileges
82 notes · View notes
pissvortex · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
i am sorry to tell you that no third world revolutionaries struggling to get out from under the foot of colonialism/imperialism have ever had the luxury of “ensuring their safety” and neither will we. this is liberal mind poison. the people in power would sooner kill everyone on earth than hand over the reins. the sooner you realize that real change is not safe to fight for the sooner you can stop wasting your time trying to overthrow capitalism with a change.org petition.
609 notes · View notes
afrohinata · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
rei says happy holidays!
56 notes · View notes