The whole point is you don't know if they're fem cis men. You don't know if they're trans men. You don't know if they're trans women deeply closeted for their safety. You don't know if they're trans women whom misgendering will drive them further AWAY from their egg cracking and harm them. You. Don't. Know.
Misgendering is bad. "Clocking" someone is bad. Making assumptions about someone's identity and then turning it into a "joke" is bad. What's funny about misgendering someone?
Also, this discourse is literally in the context of the queer community. It's literally in the context of the queer community having an antimasculinity and gender essentialism problem. It's also in the context of gender stereotypes and the fact that smelling like flowers or painting your nails making you a girl doesn't become less of a harmless stereotype because it's a trans woman saying it. Like oh wow we went full circle from "girls play with dolls and like pink" to "trans girls play with dolls and like pink". Congrats on alienating every non-femme trans woman and femme trans non-woman.
It's not fucking transmisogyny to tell you not to misgender people or assume liking frilly things makes someone a girl. It's not fucking transmisogyny to tell you that the QUEER and especially TRANS communities have an issue with valorizing femininity while demonizing masculinity. It's not fucking transmisogyny to acknowledge this while acknowledging that actual transmisogyny demonizes transfemininity while infantilizing and erasing transmasculinity.
I'm putting the word transmisogyny on a high shelf until the rest of y'all learn what it actually fucking means. Transmisogyny isn't when an entitled white trans woman gets called out for doing actual harm. Like "joking" about misgendering someone. Or "joking" about being racist and going through a "nazi phase". Or "joking" about "raping cuntboys". It might be affirming that some queer people take your white woman's tears at face value, but here's the thing:
You're lovely women who deserve to have every access to transition, to resources, to be treated equally to cis people. You're just really fucking shitty people. You're bigots, you're cruel, you're cliquey, and you're like every boring high school mean girl who never grew out of pettily bullying other vulnerable people to get over the pathetic inadequacies of your own life circumstances.
People like that deserve community and kindness too. They also deserve not to have their behavior tolerated and to have to deal with compassionate rehabilitative justice. Those things can both be true, especially when the people they are hurting explain until our throats are raw how they're hurting us and they just keep doing it. Because the thing is, it's not actually about any "societal pressure to transition", and the fact you think it is shows you haven't listened to a single actual criticism anyone has had of the whole "egg discourse".
Other people have already explained more patiently and eloquently than me what exactly the problem with calling someone an egg is. I'd think you'd be concerned minimally with how it hurts actual transfem eggs more than anything, even if you don't care about how it very much does hurt transmascs and GNC cis men and the movement of transfeminism as a damn whole to insist "haha liking fem things=woman".
Explain what's funny about that. I'll wait.
Anyway, this was reblogged from someone I long ago considered a friend, someone I thought was better than this. I really thought most trans people were better than this when I first entered the community. I still hope some are. You deserve to be told that this is wrong, because you deserve to be reminded that you're better people than this kind of bullshit.
-your utterly over it neighborhood intersex transneufemmasc
170 notes
·
View notes
Can I still have DID if I don't know if I have alters?
Short answer? Yes.
Long answer? Yes, One of the biggest things about DID is hiding. Hiding memories, hiding switches, hiding alters.
The reason someone who has DID might not know about their alters is that their system is covert, meaning that it's not always easy to see. Alters might mask as others, sometimes not even realising that they are not the same as the host / bodily identity.
If one is in an unsafe situation, usually the same one that led to the disorder forming, theyre not likely to know or notice any alters or symptoms until they are out of that place. That's a big reason why many systems only understand they are systems once they move out / go to college / etc.
If you suspect you have DID and don't know of any alters, you might have it. or you might have any other dissociative / trauma disorder, ranging from osdd to PTSD or something else.
If you want to know your alters, try leaving notes around your space, or talk to yourself (in your mind or out loud)
Your alters might be as confused as you are, or they may seem to already know a bunch. That is okay. They might not be ready to show themselves.
Take your time with this, if you're able to have a therapist or carer of any kind, talk to them about it.
34 notes
·
View notes
oh my god . can binary people PLEASE stop trying to reinvent a binary . if your work is aimed towards men just say that. but classifying everyone who's "fem aligned" or uses she/her as a woman is very gross and nbphobic
74 notes
·
View notes
Me, a physically disabled (high support needs) neurodivergent (mid to high support needs) person: Hey, my neurodivergence IS extremely disabling in a way that a lot of you say "isn't possible" and also my physical and neurological disabilities often combine in ways that can't be separated and produce symptoms that are new or of added severity for me.
Responses I've gotten from disabled exclusionists (some of whom are also both physically disabled and neurodivergent):
"What drugs are you on, you delusional freak?"
"I've never experienced this and therefore you're a dirty lying physically abled neurodivergent person who just wants to be more disabled and oppressed than you are. My experiences are universal and anyone who has different experiences is a lying liar. No one can ever prove otherwise because my axiom is that anyone who claims otherwise is lying."
"The ableds are at it again."
"Sit down and let the REAL disabled people talk."
"You're never allowed to find similarities between disabilities that are of different types, even ones you have, and if you do you're actually the reason why accessibility is such an issue because conflating them is why ableist doctors don't give us what we need and why society thinks medical gatekeeping is good, actually."
"If you're that suicidal do us all a favor and kill yourself."
This is without even getting into stuff about how disabled labels often apply differently to systems. The big discourse now is "nonverbal" labels for headmates who are permanently, always nonverbal, primarily by people and systems who refuse to view systems as anything but "parts" of a single person. Which is funny to me because ah yes, we have actual studies showing physical disabilities such as allergies can apply only to individual headmates, but gods forbid you apply a neurological label to someone whose brain activity is not only visibly different on scans from yours, but to the extent that it changes your entire shared physical body!
Like here's a novel idea: maybe we could just stop policing how other disabled people talk about their disabilities forever! Maybe we could blame any and all harm done even from the unicorn-rarity "actual fakers/liars" (also don't think I don't see you being ableist against people with actual diagnosed that cause compulsive lying) on the ableists DOING the harm because it's actually perfectly possible for them not to cherrypick our words and listen to the MAJORITY of us!
Maybe, just maybe, we could form a coalition, focus on the REAL enemy (ableist medical professionals and lawmakers) and push for actual change for ALL of us!
36 notes
·
View notes
Why don't you like Evelyn Hugo ? Just curious cos I had bookmarked to read it on my next long journey
per my 1 star goodreads review when i DNF'd the book last year:
The writing in this is so so bad. Cliche turns of phrase, repetitive, constantly telling me things instead of demonstrating how the characters think and feel, telling ME how I should feel about what I’m reading, clunky descriptions, preachy little generalised asides of 2014 tumblr feminism about women in show business without really diving into what that means for any of the characters, lack of character depth, framed the story through Monique who is at best limp and lacking in personality and at worst a genuine idiot.
I think it’s a cheap shot to compare anything to My Immortal but reading every godawful physical description of a person in this book made me think of that, it was that bad.
I’m normally a completionist even when I don’t really like a book, but the writing was so infuriating that I could not justify wasting anymore of my short time on this earth powering through this shite. I’m annoyed I spent money on this book.
7 notes
·
View notes