#this is a john walker slander account | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

violetcrownchronicles · 5 years

Text

Disposition of Detective Fund

22 FEB 1887. Austin Daily Statesman.

THE MAYOR ON HIS METTLE. A Red Hot Communication on the Subject of the Detective Fund. Statement From the Finance Committee.

The Evening Call yesterday contained a communication signed “Citizen,” intimating that there was something wrong in the disposition of the detective fund appropriated by the council last year. The matter was before the council last night, and the action of that body is noted in the report of proceedings. The following cards from the mayor and the finance committee also bear on the subject:

MAYOR ROBERTSON’S CARD.

Editors of THE STATESMAN.

There appears in the Call newspaper of this evening a communication signed “Citizen,” in which I am grossly and villainously assailed. It is asserted that the money appropriated by the city December 24, 1885, to employ detectives to aid in apprehending the authors of the recent murders in this city, has been in some way misapplied. A letter is given, signed by W. A. Pinkerton, stating that he was never employed by the city of Austin. This letter is true. I never employed W. A. Pinkerton and never had a line of correspondence with him in my life. I employed Matt W. Pinkerton not W. A. Pinkerton, and he had, for several weeks in this city, two detectives, then three, and for a time four. Their expenses and per diem was paid out of this fund, and I have the receipt of Matt. W. Pinkerton, as follows:

CHICAGO, April 20,1886.

Received from Hon. J. W. Robertron, mayor of the city of Austin, Texas, for per diem and expenses of operations in the Phillips and Hancock murder cases, under employment by the city of Austin, Texas the sum of $3328.27. This covers all moneys received by us and expended through us by our operations, as well as moneys advanced by them to others operating in co-operation with us in the case as per instructions received from your honor.

Per diem $1419.00

Expenses 1909.27

Total $3328.27

[Signed] MATT W. PINKERTON.

This receipt, though dated April 20, 1886, was not, in fact, received until after my report of May 1, 1886. With the report of May 1, 1886, I submitted original vouchers for every cent expended, except the sum of $13.50 for back hire and telegrams received and sent. These vouchers were carefully and critically examined, as was my final account of the expenditures by the finance committee of the city council, composed of J. M. Odell, W. B. Wortham and W. B. Walker, and they made the following report:

AUSTIN, TEXAS, May 3, 1886.

We, the undersigned, have examined the account endorsed by J. W. Robertson, mayor, of the disposition made of the money appropriated by the city council for detective service. Vouchers for money paid were furnished by him and examined by us, and we have found them correct. And we would further any that we believe the money has been expended judiciously and as economically as possible.

(Signed) J. W. ODELI,

W. B. WORTHAM,

W. B. WALKER,

Finance Committee.

My recollection is that I left the vouchers and other papers in the hands of the committee. At any rate they passed from my custody on May 3, 1886, and I have never seen them since. The city clerk, who is custodian, can find only the report. The vouchers are missing, and I have no doubt the author of this infamous libel knows where they are. The balance of the money used which was not paid to Pinkerton was accounted for to the last cent. This work was carried on necessarily with great secrecy, yet there are many citizens of high standing who were in constant communication with the detectives. I may mention City Marshal Lucy, Corr Lucy, J. P. Kirk, John Chenneville, A. P. Wooldridge and others. The charge is a base, infamous and cowardly slander. It comes from a man who withholds his name, and shrinks back in his cowardly obscurity. I seek no newspaper controversy, and I will have none. This charge is so infamous that I could not remain silent. I invite all people who are interested in an honest city government whether friend or foe, to investigate every act of mine since I have been in office. There is a public record of all I have ever done open to all.

The man who can so forget all that is honorable or brave among men—who can sink so low that the scorn and contempt of honorable men cannot reach him—who places himself beyond the pale of all that is courageous, just, or fair; who, from his safe retreat, will hurl his falsehood, his slander, his malice, at his victim. Such is the man who signs himself “Citizen.” I have no more to say of this matter. J. W. ROBERTSON.

A DIRECT REFUTATION.

To the Editor of the Statesman:

We, the finance committee of the city council of the city of Austin, in justice to Mayor Roberson and ourselves, because of the charges made in the Evening Call yesterday against the mayor, desire to say that we, as such committee, at the request of the mayor met and closely examined and scrutinized each and every voucher relating to the expenditure of the $5000 appropriated for detective purposes by the city council, and can say that the entire sum so appropriated, was properly and correctly accounted for, and a report to that effect, submitting all vouchers, was made to the council, and the same was unanimously adopted; therefore, we, as such committee, stand prepared to say that all charges as to the misappropriation of any part of said $5000 are untrue and without any foundation whatever.

J. M. ODELL,

W. B. WORTHAM,

W. B. WALKER.

#1887 #February 1887 #Austin #servant girl murders #john chenneville #james lucy #James Robertson #government #police #detectives #matt pinkerton #Alexander Wooldridge #murders

1 note · View note

lgbtloudhouse · 7 years

Note

So you’re going to believe that?

Just read this, pasting from online: Ok, so here is what we know about the Chris Savino Situation so far. A sort of timeline of events... to tell everyone what I know and what we all currently know.Chris Savino has been suspended by Nickelodeon. That has been confirmed, he's been out of the Network for the last week. Allegedly, according to 4Chan, Nickelodeon and Viacom had been launching an ongoing investigation into these claims of Sexual Harassment. Cartoon Brew broke the story, more than likely it was leaked to them by an anon source. People are shocked, and many immediately bash Brew as fake news, and telling a lie as they are the only source on the matter. Cartoon Brew has a shitty reputation, that's not a surprise. Amid, the writer of the Article, states the source is Cartoon Brew, and Cartoon Brew has broken other Sexual Harassment stories that turned out to be true. "We're reporting this exclusively as we reported Skyler Page's firing from Cartoon Network, Brenda Chapman being removed from her film "Brave," and other exclusive stories."More people have come out to say something about the situation, including Freelance Animator Frank Macchina who claims to have worked fot Chris years ago and is happy he is being brought to justice. Others include Anna Walker Farrell who is the director of Bojack Horseman, and Jessie Sarah who is a writer and apparent director of talent at CN (She has since protected her Twitter for approval, I assume since she spoke out)@Noemisculptures on Twitter who claims to know Savino personally says he was able to talk to some people in Nickelodeon to confirm the sexual harassment claims are true and so is the investigation. The following were compiled by Twitter user @Jeraspat off of screencaps from 4Chan. Of course it's 4Chan, so everything can be taken with a grain of salt here.There are other people, Anons on 4Chan (One as far back at July), who have supported this claim, and a Anon Source that Cartoon Brew also sighted that her friend was used by Chris Savino, and when she turned down his sexual advances, her pilot pitch and his help getting her in the industry, were dropped completely. Another Anon on 4Chan who claimed they worked in the Industry stated that it's incredibly hard to get jobs in the industry and people like Savino doing things like this and people not speaking up makes total sense, that he basically preyed on new students and threatened them with blacklisting if they said anything. Like the above user's friend. Other 4Chan Anons brought up slander on Savino for reported things he did in the past, these things include:- Giving props to a /tlhg/, a Loud House Porn Site, for their art and immediately privating his Twitter when he did so. In a later PM he says he did it by accident not checking the site first but still gave props to the artists and understands they do their own thing. - An incident at SCAD, a school which he premiered the Loud House Pilot before pitching it to Nickelodeon, where he apparently got into an incident where he said weird things to female students, and hit on lgbt Animation students in the class. The school apparently got in trouble and the rest of Savino's stay there was abruptly ended. No statements from Nickelodeon or Viazom at this time. Or Chris Savino, who has deactivated his Facebook account. Joe Murray, creator of Rocko, on his official facebook stated he can't confirm of deny anything but that Carton Brew is not a reliable sourceThe story is now being reported by Variety, The New York Post, The Washington Post, Newsweek, Animation Magazine, and Deadline. All site Cartoon Brew as the exclusive source.What it sounds like to me, is something was going on, and Cartoon Brew just hail mary'd it out there. Why would a site risk any legitimacy they have left, if they didn't have SOMETHING? Which is why I believe something is happening here or Cartoon Brew would be finished. On top of Brew, there are a ton of accusations floating at Chris from people in the Industry confirmed, and Anon people who have either witnessed it or are in the industry.I don't know what direction this story is going to take, but for better or worse I will keep you updated. Obviously I don't want this to be true... and no I will not stop supporting Loud House as a whole, but I understand if people do. But a creator does not CREATE a whole show, hundreds of people with jobs and passion have made this show what it is... where it goes from here I dont know. Does it lose its movie, its video game, ratings, air time? We're going to find out in the coming days.ON ANOTHER NOTE, John Cawley, freelance writer, on the group "Cartoon Research" (The Group that walked out on Cartoon Brew because of the direction it was taking, ironically enough), shared his own insight into Nickelodeon from when he used to work there in the past about Sexual Harassment in the company... these are his exact quotes. He worked with Chris on The Flintstones: On The Rocks, and Dexter's Lab."Have worked with Chris... and at that time he showed no such issues. Unlike several others at Nick who were horrific at harassment. But they were high enough in the studio so as any complaints were quickly buried... and sometimes the complainers fired.""Heh, while at Nick there was a creative exec with two harassment suits against them. The exec had worked a bit on Ren & Stimpy, so was highly thought of by many a younger creator. At a meeting with Viacom execs we were told that after the JohnK issue, NO ONE with any connection to Ren and Stimpy could be fired. Period. And it was equally 'lax' at Cartoon Network and other studios I worked. The studios would send all the execs to harassment training seminars to "identify the situations"... and once back at the studio we'd be told to just 'let it go'."So while he doesn't condemn Chris, his accusations may be even more damning to the industry as a whole if they are to be believed, it's not pretty...Whether we like this or not, this is out there, and it's going to be a topic of discussion... and it sucks... it sucks if it's fake, it sucks if it's true. I'm just here to tell you, what I'm seeing, and unfortunately, it hasn't been any good for Savino, as many seem to be mounting a big offense against him, and if it's true, who can blame them? I hope you all still like and appreciate the page. I don't LIKE reporting this, but it's a big breaking story, it's one I wish we didn't have to see, but I will still to my best to bring the laughs amongst this chaos. Just hope you stick with me through it all, the more the merrier when it comes to this shitstorm... and if you want more updates and news, The Twitter @RiseFallNick will also be updating this story as it unfolds.Link: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=705739362962851&id=141475229389270

16 notes · View notes

zombiepineapple · 3 years

Text

Answering a few questions about Free Speech online

Free Speech and Exceptions

Originally a Greek ideology, freedom of speech is extremely important to our culture and legislation (History.com Editors, 2018). The United States first amendment promising the freedom of speech without government censorship helps people share information, communicate, protest, make symbolic statements and more. The supreme court has had considerable cases to draw lines in the sand, showing us what we can and can’t say. Generally, speech that promotes hatred, violence, or slander are denied the freedom to circulate (History.com Editors, 2018). This can be very interpretive, however, as one person’s truth can be another’s lie, and opinions can be perceived as strength by one person, and violent by another.

Internet Censorship: What keeps Platforms from Censoring Properly? Does Internet censorship deny the right to free speech?

The internet tends to follow the same rules as the US legal system, but grey areas make things difficult. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, YouTube content creators would have their videos demonetized if they said the word “covid” in their videos (Stokel-Walker, 2020). This was a choice the platform made in order to give priority to authoritative sources and deter the spread of misinformation. YouTube had good intentions, but ended up censoring too strictly, inspiring people to find loopholes in order to subvert the rule completely. One example was that people began saying “CV” phonetically instead of the word “covid”, which was enough to get around the censorship checks (Stokel-Walker, 2020). A famous phrase “first coined by internet pioneer John Gilmore [states] ‘The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.’ (Chander, 2015)"

Another issue of internet censorship is that some types of illegal speech are made egregiously simple with the internet, like plagiarism or child pornography. Large platforms can have difficulty sifting through their users to stop these types of situations, especially when there’s so much blatant violence to regulate (Marantz, 2020). Violations flying under-the-radar or actively trying to remain hidden can elude law enforcement by hiding behind overwhelmed internet platforms with little or non-specific monitoring and censorship.

Online platforms must worry about political and public sway as well, not just legality. Whether it’s “flag burning, cross burning, public display of profanities, violent video games, lies about having military honors, depictions of animal cruelty, non-obscene sexual expression, [or an] offensive protests outside a private funeral trigger[ing] the concerns that animate the Free Speech Clause... free speech controversies repeatedly find themselves intertwined with contemporary political and public policy battles. (Chen, 2020)” This can mean that the most popular or controversial examples are given the most attention, resulting in more extreme censorship, rather than any agreed consensus or enforcement. This also leads to platforms that knowingly exchange less censorship for more users and financial gain.

Corporate Free Speech: How can a company incorporate free speech issues into their best practices and code of conduct? Does the ACM Code of Ethics cover this issue?

The best way for a company to incorporate free speech in their codes of conduct is to consider scenario-specific intent and consequences. If an intent or result of speech breaks a principle of the ACM Code of Ethics, that speech cannot be considered included in the person’s first amendment's right. For example, discriminatory speech in the workplace, harassment, or bullying, all which can lead to harm (Code of Ethics, 2016). A person cannot speak in an unethical and dishonorable manner and expect to be protected. A metaphor for this is that a person cannot fire shots from behind a shield. So, though the ACM Code of Ethics doesn’t explicitly touch on first amendment rights, ethical standards including freedom of speech can still be formed.

Does Fake News Equate to Free Speech?

Incorrect information can cause real damage. “One day in 2013, a false rumor, circulated on Twitter, caused the stock market to lose $200 billion in value. Someone hijacking the Associated Press Twitter account had falsely reported injury to the President, sending the market into a swoon. Lawsuits for damages would have spelled the death of Twitter” but no lawsuits were filed because the first amendment protected the media platform (Chander, 2015). While some types of Fake News can be considered libel, some types are simply too hard to pinpoint blame, and may result in questionable harm. For example, there are too many hands at fault for the internet rumor claiming the coronavirus vaccine had miniscule microchips in them because of a mass surveillance conspiracy theory led by Bill Gates (Carmichael, 2020).

Censorship can keep false facts from spreading, but rumors snowball into online groups and communities spreading the information as if it’s sensible public opinion requiring discourse. fake news connects like-minded people and “promote(s) expressive experiential autonomy” (Chen, 2020). This means that Fake News has “Free Speech Value”. The fact that this type of speech is useful to some people, aligning with an original intent for the first amendment’s encouragement of democracy, means that all fake news must count as protected free speech. Fake News can only be removed if there is proven harm resulting from the story, causing the right to be revoked (Chen, 2020).

Conclusion

As the concept of Free Speech has formed the internet, the quandaries of the evolving technology have brought more and more questions in how to further define Free Speech. Most decisions tend to be based on evidence of injury after-the-fact. As legislation catches up to today’s cyber world, new boundaries will be set. Until then, Free Speech online remains a type of wild west, where the rules depend on where you happen to be.

References

Carmichael, J. G. and F. (2020, May 30). The Bill Gates “microchip” claim fact-checked. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/52847648

Chander, A., & Le, U. P. (2015). Free speech. Iowa Law Review, 100(2), 501+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A398524041/PPCJ?u=lirn55593&sid=bookmark-PPCJ&xid=f302009e

Chen, A. K. (2020). FREE SPEECH, RATIONAL DELIBERATION, AND SOME TRUTHS ABOUT LIES. William and Mary Law Review, 62(2), 357+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A650781945/PPCJ?u=lirn55593&sid=bookmark-PPCJ&xid=d1397461

Code of Ethics. (2016, June 7). ACM Ethics. https://ethics.acm.org/code-of-ethics/

History.com Editors. (2018, August 21). Freedom of Speech. HISTORY; A&E Television Networks. https://www.history.com/topics/united-states-constitution/freedom-of-speech

‌ Stokel-Walker, C. (2020, March 30). YouTube’s Independent Creators Are Mad That They Can’t Say “Coronavirus.” Medium. https://onezero.medium.com/youtubes-independent-creators-are-mad-that-they-can-t-say-coronavirus-e7b16ae844fa

Tavani, H. T. (2012). Ethics and technology : controversies, questions, and strategies for ethical computing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Marantz, A. (2020, October 12). Why Facebook Can’t Fix Itself. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/10/19/why-facebook-cant-fix-itself

#cybersecurity #ethics #first amendment #freedom #speech

0 notes

jobsearchtips02 · 4 years

Text

Inside clash between Minneapolis cops and union: Arradondo and Kroll

Visit Organisation Expert’s homepage for more stories

A choice from the 2007 suit brought by now-chief Medaria Arradondo.

United States District Court, District of Minnesota, Fourth Department.

In 2007, a group of five black law enforcement officer, each with more than a lots years on the job, sued Minneapolis’ police department for racial discrimination

But thirteen years later on, Kroll and Arradondo are at odds once again over racism.

Arradondo now serves as Minneapolis’ police chief, whose officer was shown killing George Floyd in a now-notorious video that triggered an across the country uprising.

( Keith Ellison, who Kroll is said to have slandered, is now Minnesota’s Attorney general of the United States, currently bringing charges versus Arradondo’s officers and Kroll’s union members.)

Chief Arradondo.

Jerry Holt/Star Tribune via Getty Images. Progressives laud unions as the voice of the America’s progressively black and brown working class. Criminal justice experts informed Business Expert that authorities unions safeguard aggressive cops, buttressing the underlying system of cops brutality in the United States.

Both the union and MPD declined to comment.

A protester kneels at the memorial for George Floyd where he passed away outdoors Cup Foods in Minneapolis.

John Minchillo/AP.

Minneapolis cops chiefs have been pushing for reform– however the union won’t let it take place

Though Arradondo called out Kroll’s bad habits in his claim years back, the union leader has normally spoken well of his chief: “He’s the opposite of a narcissist,” Kroll told the Star Tribune

Still, the 2 have actually sparred over key authorities reform policies.

In 2014, when Arradondo was serving as chief of personnel to former Police Chief Janée Harteau, he assisted introduce an authorities body cam policy to hold bad cops liable.

Kroll at first supported body electronic cameras, informing MinnPost his only objection was if civilians disagreed with being taped at protests or disruptions.

However he changed course in 2017, after a law enforcement officer shot and eliminated a white Australian woman in a street; the officer’s body electronic camera was turned off at the time of the shooting. Kroll stated the officers at the scene “were in compliance with existing body camera policy.”

After the killing, Arradondo altered the body video camera policy to guarantee they stayed switched on. “There are some officers, rather honestly, that are not utilizing them nearly enough,” he told the New York City Times

The 2 sparred once again in 2019, after Arradondo transferred to bar authorities from wearing their uniforms to political rallies ahead of an arranged check out from President Trump. Kroll had actually previously been photographed completely uniform standing at a rally for Republican agent Erik Paulsen. The US Hatch Act limits the political activity of federal staff members along with specific state-level employees that work in connection with federal programs, like Kroll.

Kroll called Arradondo’s choice “politically motivated.” Kroll stated of authorities union’s members that “We’re going to exist completely force, in T-shirts, letting individuals know that off-duty officers do have assistance for our president.”

The differences in between the 2 have now gone national. Arradondo quickly fired the 4 officers associated with George Floyd’s arrest, and suggested that the officers who enjoyed Floyd having a hard time to breathe ought to have stepped in.

” Mr. Floyd passed away in our hands therefore I see that as being complicit,” Arradondo informed CNN’s Sara Sidner “Silence and inactiveness, you’re complicit.”

Kroll disagreed. In a letter addressed to union members, Kroll stated the officers were “scapegoats” and had actually been fired “without due procedure.”

” What has been really obvious throughout this procedure is you have done not have support from the top,” Kroll informed members. “This terrorist movement that is currently taking place was a long time develop which dates back years.”

New Yorkers hold a banner throughout a protest over the death of George Floyd.

ayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency by means of Getty Images.

Kroll was a challenge to the chief prior to Arradondo, too

Bob Kroll got his start in the Minneapolis police department in1989 The son of a union man, Kroll joined the Minneapolis Police Federation in1996

The Star Tribune reports that throughout his tenure, Kroll has actually amassed at least 20 internal-affairs problems against him, some for aggressive habits. In one federal suit, complainants said Kroll beat, choked, and kicked a 15- year-old biracial young boy in the groin while gushing racial slurs, the Pioneer Press reported The court cleared Kroll of wrongdoing. Another suit from 2007 declared Kroll and a group of officers utilized excessive force on an elderly couple during a SWAT group search.

As union chief, Kroll has protected other aggressive officers in his ranks. The union leader stood up for officer Steven Andersen, who was fired for eliminating a 19- year-old Hmong teen throughout a foot chase. After the authorities department reinstated Andersen, Kroll said he was “extremely delighted” because Andersen was “born to be a police,” the Leader Press reported

Kroll later protected the 2 officers involved in the 2016 killing of Jamar Clark, a 24- year-old black male who witnesses stated had been handcuffed, calling their actions ” warranted.”

After taking his function as union head in 2015, Kroll often sparred with then-Police Chief Janeé Harteau, who between 2012 and 2017 was the very first woman and first honestly gay cops chief in Minneapolis history, before getting ousted from her post following a police killing. Harteau was, nevertheless, able to enact a “sanctity of life” policy after the Clark shooting, which was the policy cited by Arradondo in firing the officers involved in Floyd’s death.

The Philando Castile shooting in 2016, which occurred outside of Minneapolis, in Falcon Heights, ended up being a Kroll story when he said he applauded four off-duty officers leaving of their security responsibilities at a Minnesota Lynx WNBA video game. Minneapolis’ mayor at the time, Betsy Hodges, said Kroll’s words were ” jackass remarks” that didn’t show the views of the city or the MPD.

Kroll also publicly pushed back on policy modifications Harteau presented to minimize using force by cops. He said her initiatives, that included avoiding potentially fatal conflict, may reduce public rely on police and result in more criminal activity.

After Harteau departed, Kroll continued to oppose reform measures, consisting of an effort by Mayor Jacob Frey to prohibit “warrior-style” training for officers.

Previous MPD Chief Janée Harteau typically sparred with union leader Bob Kroll.

Jerry Holt/Star Tribune via Getty Images.

Arradondo served various supervisory positions prior to being promoted to supervise the internal affairs unit, which oversees misconduct complaints, in 2013, and then serving as Harteau’s chief of staff in 2014.

” They all have to be at the same table, and they all have to hear the exact same messaging,” he told Minnesota Public Radio.

Arradondo had climbed the ranks after settling his racial discrimination case versus the department in 2009, coming away with $187,000

Amongst other things, the claim asserted that Kroll used to use a motorbike coat with a ” White Power” badge sewn onto it.

However in the public sector, union subscription has actually remained strong due to an absence of competitors, according to Dan DiSalvo of the Manhattan Institute

Sam Walker, emeritus professor of criminal justice at the University of Nebraska at Omaha, stated cops unions mostly formed in the 1950 s and 1960 s for the function of jointly bargaining for pensions and health care.

However in addition to advocating for greater salaries, unions likewise looked for to safeguard task security by limiting disciplinary openness.

” I believe there’s a consensus amongst my peers that police unions and their contracts are to police the major challenge to accountability,” Walker stated.

In Minneapolis, Reuters discovered that 9 out of every 10 accusations of misconduct from city police officers were dealt with without penalty. Of the 3,000 grievances relating to authorities in the last 8 years, just five resulted in termination.

African-Americans account for 20%of Minneapolis’ population however for more than 60%of the victims in authorities shootings, according to an analysis from The New York City Times The city’s own data reveals that its police officers utilize force against blacks 7 times more than they do versus whites.

Kroll confesses he is no complete stranger to shooting. In a podcast interview this past April, Kroll stated he has actually been involved in “3 shootings” himself, The Intercept reported.

In a possible sign of the growing aggravation with police unions’ suppression of meaningful reform, protesters after George Floyd’s death burned the head office of the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) in Washington, DC.

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka informed press reporters he would not disengage with authorities unions. “The brief answer is not to disengage and simply condemn,” he said.

Richard Trumka told press reporters he would not disengage with police unions, “just condemn” them.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images.

Brooklyn College sociologist Alex Vitale, author of ” Completion of Policing” and previous vice president of a faculty union, informed Organisation Insider that the labor movement should restrict authorities unions and expose their “awful politics.” Vitale stated the more comprehensive labor motion has actually lost its wider objective to aid social justice, which allowed AFL-CIO to relaxing up with authorities unions.

” One of the functions traditionally of police has been the direct suppression of workers’ movements and unionization efforts,” Vitale told Organisation Insider. “Having them belong to our labor movement seems counter-productive.”

Kroll, meanwhile, has actually tied great police-work with building up civilian problems.

” Officers that have thick grievance sleeves are likewise extremely embellished,” Kroll told the Pioneer Press in 2016.

And the department led by Medaria Arradondo, the one he took legal action against more than a years earlier for racial discrimination?

Last summertime, his department had to fire two officers over a furor that struck the previous winter season.

%%.

from Job Search Tips https://jobsearchtips.net/inside-clash-between-minneapolis-cops-and-union-arradondo-and-kroll/

0 notes

unixcommerce · 4 years

Text

Letting an Employee Go: 13 Key Tips for New Managers

Young entrepreneurs don’t always have an easy time dealing with their teams. Sometimes, an employee just doesn’t fit the expectations that a business owner or the company has for them. In such a case, the most beneficial thing to do is to let the employee go. Breaking the news to them requires a bit of planning, however. It can be an emotional time for the employee, and managers — especially ones who are new to the position — may be worried about emotional outbursts from the employee or other fallout. That’s why we asked members of Young Entrepreneur Council the following:

“An employee isn’t working out, and you know you have to let them go. What should a small business owner, particularly one who may be new to management, know before they sit down with the employee and give them the news?”

Tips on Letting an Employee Go

1. Be Honest But Brief

“An employee would rather know why they’re being fired. Give them honest feedback with a performance evaluation and make sure beforehand to follow the Human Resources’ system of written or verbal complaints so they have no grounds for wrongful termination lawsuits. They will be more hurt and angry if you hide your reasons because they cannot learn from their mistakes. Honesty is the best default.” ~ Patrick Barnhill, Specialist ID, Inc.

2. Prepare What You Want to Say

“It’s important to think through everything you want to say to the employee about why it’s not working. Wording it in advance can help remove any emotion from the experience while also reflecting on how you can be respectful of the employee at the same time.” ~ John Rampton, Calendar

3. Keep a Log

“All small business owners should keep a log of the employee’s behavior for a week or two leading up to the termination to prevent legal issues or lawsuits arising. Make notes about the employee’s behavior, poor performance or any other relevant issues that would result in termination.” ~ Kristin Kimberly Marquet, Marquet Media, LLC

4. Grab a Witness

“If you’re going to terminate someone, make sure you have another manager there in the room while it happens. This procedure is excellent for documenting and defusing the situation if it escalates. Additionally, a witness can help if false claims get filed against your company.” ~ Chris Christoff, MonsterInsights

5. Pick a Proper Time and Place

“Just as important as what you say, is the time and the place you say it. If you have an open-area office plan, be sure to hold the meeting in a private conference room away from other employees. And it’s wise to do it earlier in the week like on a Monday rather than on a Friday; this allows your other employees to adjust during the rest of the work week without the employee you let go.” ~ David Henzel, LTVPlus

6. Expect the Worst

“Some people will not take losing their job very well and may freak out and seek to do damage. Before actually sitting down, separate them from the rest of the team, remove their logins and so on to ensure they don’t cause any harm to the rest of your business. When it’s time to let people go, you should do so fully and simply pay out their last month.” ~ Karl Kangur, Above House

7. Remain Calm

“Being let go is pretty daunting news for most, so when the time comes, remain calm and don’t let any negativity get under your skin. It’s also important to be empathetic toward the employee if they’re being let go for things out of their control, so keep this in mind when bearing the bad news.” ~ Stephanie Wells, Formidable Forms

8. Listen to Their Interpretation

“Even if the decision to terminate is already finalized, it’s still crucial to have open ears and listen to your employees when they explain their side of the story. Just because you’re letting them go doesn’t mean they don’t deserve respect and dignity, and the least you can do is hear them out.” ~ Jared Atchison, WPForms

9. Protect Your Information Systems

“The ideal situation is where the employee termination takes place calmly and without ill will. Nevertheless, it’s smart to protect your information systems well in advance. Make sure that the employee no longer has access to their email, company accounts and resources. Work with your IT staff to take the proper steps to manage your employee’s account before termination.” ~ Syed Balkhi, WPBeginner

10. Consider the Whole Picture

“Never fire an employee before you have a solid backup plan in place. Firing an employee without a plan in place to replace their contribution to the team can have a negative effect on the morale of the entire team. Especially if as a result of the firing, you are suddenly asking them to do even more work than their already full plate.” ~ Ben Walker, Transcription Outsourcing, LLC

11. Offer the Opportunity for Feedback

“It’s important that you have a good understanding of what failed and why and to be very clear about why things didn’t work out — if it was an issue of matching expectations or if the employee’s work was suffering. Either way, allow them to answer and ask for any feedback. Hopefully they will improve for the next company and not leave your company with sour feelings that could manifest later on in slander.” ~ Nicole Munoz, Nicole Munoz Consulting, Inc.

12. Identify the Legal Grounds

“Depending on where your business is located, there are different rules for termination of a contract. In some parts of the world this is more difficult than others. Before having this conversation with your employee, you need to know what rights you have and ensure you have documented the process. This will avoid any ugly disputes that could be costly for your business reputation.” ~ Baruch Labunski, Rank Secure

13. Wish Them Well

“It seems fairly obvious and polite to end your conversation with an employee by wishing them the best. However, it’s something that’s easy to forget if the moment is tense, as it often can be. You want to end your conversation with your employee with a fair and positive impression, if possible. You never know if your paths cross in the future and you always want to take the high road.” ~ Blair Williams, MemberPress

Image: Depositphotos.com

This article, “Letting an Employee Go: 13 Key Tips for New Managers” was first published on Small Business Trends

https://smallbiztrends.com/

The post Letting an Employee Go: 13 Key Tips for New Managers appeared first on Unix Commerce.

from WordPress https://ift.tt/339uDHZ via IFTTT

#IFTTT #WordPress

0 notes

unixcommerce · 4 years

Text

Letting an Employee Go: 13 Key Tips for New Managers

Tips on Letting an Employee Go

1. Be Honest But Brief

2. Prepare What You Want to Say

3. Keep a Log

4. Grab a Witness

5. Pick a Proper Time and Place

6. Expect the Worst

7. Remain Calm

8. Listen to Their Interpretation

9. Protect Your Information Systems

10. Consider the Whole Picture

11. Offer the Opportunity for Feedback

12. Identify the Legal Grounds

13. Wish Them Well

Image: Depositphotos.com

This article, “Letting an Employee Go: 13 Key Tips for New Managers” was first published on Small Business Trends

https://smallbiztrends.com/

The post Letting an Employee Go: 13 Key Tips for New Managers appeared first on Unix Commerce.

from WordPress https://ift.tt/339uDHZ via IFTTT

#IFTTT #WordPress

0 notes