Tumgik
#elegant modern women
mote-historie · 11 months
Photo
Tumblr media
Alfred Stevens, After the Ball. 1874
This painting, also known as Confidence, is one of several by Stevens to treat the theme of consolation. As in his other works from the 1870s, here the anecdotal content of a letter containing distressing news asserts itself in a glimpse of the life of fashionable Parisian women in their elegant interiors. Stevens's subject matter and his meticulous attention to contemporary dress and decor elicited analogies to seventeenth-century Dutch and Flemish art; in fact, one critic called him the Gerard ter Borch of France.
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
217 notes · View notes
tired-fandom-ndn · 3 months
Text
Women don't shave because men want them to look like children, they shave because razor companies wanted to make more money and spent decades framing body hair as unhygienic and shaving as luxurious and mature, something that women with the time to spend doing some pointless cosmetic thing and the money to spend on razors and shaving creams and all their other products do because they're rich and beautiful and important.
That's it. It's capitalist bullshit dependant on misogyny and on creating new misogynistic beauty standards and kids have absolutely nothing to do with it.
80 notes · View notes
11oh1 · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
24 notes · View notes
Note
have you seen that annoying try guys video about corsets. why’re they tightlacing like it’s average wear?
Yeah, and it's just a lot of nonsense. Like all of those videos.
Why do they tightlace? Because that's what people want to see. Not everyone; a lot of people are genuinely interested in learning. But unfortunately, a loud minority wants to believe the easiest, least complicated, most sensational version of the past. And that loud minority votes with engagement. You CAN get clicks for saying the corsets were basically the bras of their day, and women's relationship with them was similarly complicated and individual, but they were not unilateral torture devices- look at the success of costube in recent years -but that takes effort. Why bother, when you can just play to the lowest denominator of historical clothing knowledge?
(On some level, I do understand where the impulse comes from- the eras where pairs of bodies/stays/corsets were commonplace were also times of intense systemic misogyny, so "women were forced into torturous undergarments" seems par for the course. And the pressure on women to look and dress a certain way is obviously wrapped up in misogyny, then and now, even though women were not suffocating themselves into 15" waists like pop history insists. It's a myth that makes sense given its context; that's how it's survived.)
(That and the fact that the women who wrote the most about corsets were the ones who hated them. Likely a minority compared to the vast numbers of women then alive in corset-intensive cultures, but their strong feelings compelled them to speak out in ways that the probable majority never did. Who sits down and writes "Dear diary, another uneventful day wearing an ultra-commonplace support garment that I'm fairly neutral about?")
(But if you absolutely loathe wearing something- due to sensory issues, perceived hassle of dressing, feeling like your needs aren't met or are impeded by the garment, etc. -and social pressure says You Must...yeah, you're going to have some Thoughts on that subject.)
131 notes · View notes
paintermagazine · 8 months
Text
‘Snapshot’
Tumblr media
Artist/model: Louise Sagan
Source: ‘aliaslouiseblog’ (IG)
31 notes · View notes
britneyshakespeare · 4 months
Text
i didn't like the roaring girl by middleton and dekker as much as i was expecting to. i have the feeling it's just one of those you-have-to-watch-it plays but as someone who has read a lot of elizabethan-to-restoration era comedy this year, there are other have-to-watch-it plays that still fare as better entertainment in a reading. basically the selling point to me moll cutpurse as the main character herself, and on that front she didn't disappoint, but every other character in the play had minimal interest to me, or if they did, they only had a little bit of time on the stage. having already known that the plot is that she saves other women from dishonor and remains a single woman by choice, yes, that's still cool—the gender fluidity inspired by the real moll cutpurse is cool. i enjoyed reading about that. but the whole action and plot around it. lackluster.
#im also a bit partial to thinking maybe i just didnt like the editing in my edition?#but i read it in oxford world classics 'the roaring girl and other city comedies'#and that's the first play ive read in that collection but i just. idk i cant tell#when i read something else in that edition ill let you know. but i own other oxford world classics edition of english plays#and i usually like them.#i kinda enjoyed the other middleton comedy i read a few months ago a chaste maid in cheapside#not that that was really groundbreaking but i did find it funnier and the trickery of the plot was more entertaining.#the contrivances were better. and the side characters were waaaay funnier. that guy and his tutor OH my god#tales from diana#yeah if you're interested in the real historical moll cutpurse or any fiction inspired by her? i hate to say it but roaring girl's a skip#or at least it's not the first thing you need to read (it's the first thing i read)#(there must be better work though)#i also havent read enough middleton or dekker to tell whose voice is whose within the writing#but i dont find either of their styles of prose OR verse to be as elegant as shakespeare's.#i found a chaste maid in cheapside to be very modern-friendly in its language and the roaring girl i found. much less so.#i wonder if that has to do with dekker? or maybe just the vocabulary made necessary by the plot was different#hard to know! im not an expert. dont think i have any authority to discern here.#i have to read one of middleton's tragedies sometime. i still havent read women beware women
3 notes · View notes
trendtrovex · 1 month
Text
Bulova Men's Icon High Precision Quartz Chronograph Watch, Curved Mineral Crystal, 300m Water Resistant, Continous Sweeping Secondhand, Luminous Markers
Tumblr media
About this item
Featuring Precisionist, the world’s most advanced chronograph with a continuously sweeping second hand. Celebrated for its blend of technology and design innovation, features statement-making case shapes and the incorporation of innovative materials.
1/1000 Second Chronograph, Calendar
Silver-Tone Stainless Steel
Curved Mineral Crystal
300M Water Resistant and 3 Year Limited Warranty
0 notes
colorpalettebyrm · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
#a65e3c #5d88d7 #153679 #48659e #989dab #e0865c #958475 #b9aea2 #dce0e6 #c5c5cb
1 note · View note
nexthlive · 8 months
Text
NEXTH Season 4: The best is yet to come. [https://nexthchic.live/] [https://nexth.city/runway]
LIFESTYLE - [NexthChic] 146. Lee Mathews: Unstructured femininity, effortlessly graceful.
Lee Mathews is a renowned Australian fashion label that emerged in 2001, originating from the vibrant city of Sydney. Founded by the visionary Lee Mathews, who had previously showcased her creative talents as an art director for the esteemed Vogue Australia, the brand embarked on a mission that extended beyond conventional clothing design. Mathews aimed to create pieces that resonated profoundly with women, instilling a confidence that transcended mere aesthetics.
At the core of Lee Mathews' philosophy lies the fusion of functional beauty and simplicity. The brand's design ethos revolves around the belief that garments should transcend the realm of mere fabric and stitching. They should embody the wearer's personality and amplify their essence. This ideology finds its embodiment in the brand's garments, which effortlessly radiate grace and effortlessness. Each piece is meticulously crafted to encapsulate femininity through an unstructured yet captivating approach.
An unmistakable hallmark of Lee Mathews' creations is their breezy nature. The garments drape around the wearer in an ethereal manner, projecting an aura of ease and comfort. This distinctive style reflects Mathews' aspiration to liberate women from the confines of traditional fashion, offering a wardrobe that not only exudes beauty but also delivers a liberating wearing experience. Her designs strike a harmonious balance between sophistication and comfort, allowing women to embrace their individual allure without sacrificing ease of movement.
The brand's influence has transcended geographical boundaries. While its inception was in Australia, Lee Mathews' global appeal swiftly became evident. Presently, her unique creations are no longer limited to her homeland. With a widespread presence, Lee Mathews garments are accessible in over 55 locations worldwide. This international recognition underscores the universality of her designs and the emotional connection they foster.
In a fashion landscape often characterized by fleeting trends and transient allure, Lee Mathews has carved a distinctive niche by adhering to timeless principles of elegance, functionality, and confidence. The brand stands as a guiding light for those seeking to surpass the ordinary, embracing a style that seamlessly merges sophistication and comfort. By blending artistic expression with wearable design, Lee Mathews has empowered women to authentically and confidently articulate themselves through their clothing choices. This legacy firmly establishes her as a pioneer in the realm of fashion, forever altering the way we perceive and interact with our attire.
0 notes
zumaira · 8 months
Text
Womens Jannan Embroidered Bamber Chiffon Dresses 2023 By Riaz Arts
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
magazinepk · 8 months
Text
Womens Jannan Embroidered Bamber Chiffon Dresses 2023 By Riaz Arts
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
themellowworldshop · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
check out our new aesthetic art products on our society6 shop THE MELLOW WORLD
0 notes
candylandphotos · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
Beautiful Asian Red Lips Bangs Beauty
"Captivating Contrasts: The Allure of Beautiful Asian Beauty Enhanced by Fiery Red Lips and Chic Bangs 💄🌸 #AsianElegance #BoldlyBeautiful"
0 notes
paintermagazine · 1 year
Text
‘In the red!’
Tumblr media
Taylor Swift
61 notes · View notes
iajicollection · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Checkout our latest collection. This Sets consist of 8 Best Hibiscus Birthday Invitations Invitation https://iaji.net/collection/499
0 notes
marzipanandminutiae · 2 years
Text
articles about the “wild new trend” of piercing from the late ‘50s and early ‘60s are fascinating to read. a selection of excerpts:
- one doctor cautioned that girls with pierced ears would be “required to constantly wear earrings to hide the holes in their heads” (or you could just not be weird about a tiny dot on someone else’s earlobe?)
- Genevieve Dariaux, then director of the Nina Ricci couture house, said in 1965 that “Pierced ears are unthinkable for an elegant woman, and even more dreadful for a young girl.” bear in mind that, as I’ve said, earrings that made your ears LOOK pierced were still common. what the difference was, nobody has yet made plain
- lots of evidence that going to a doctor was the preferred “safe” method for piercing at the time. but many doctors refused to do it, or said they would but that they strongly discouraged patients from having the procedure done. this checks out with my mother’s experience in 1965- her schoolmate’s anesthesiologist father did free piercing for all his daughter’s friends
- some teenagers around 1965 called clip and screwback earrings “chicken earrings” (implying that the wearers were too scared of pain to get their ears pierced, I think)
- one advice column, also from 1965, implied that pierced ears were just a passing fad. the previous several centuries of western history would like a word, Mx. Columnist...
- A GIRL WITH RESTRICTIVE PARENTS BRINGING UP THE ARGUMENT THAT HER GRANDMOTHER HAD PIERCED EARS. YES. FINALLY SOMEONE REALIZED THE LOGICAL FALLACIES HERE. the argument against that is, indeed, a sort of “that was the Bad Old Days and we know better now” deal as some other commenters have hypothesized
- one article mentions that the trend could be part of the Victorian revival that was just becoming popular in the mid-60s, which is a fascinating thought I’ve never considered before
- many doctors complaining that they were suddenly being called upon to pierce ears despite not really knowing how. this is interesting, because before the Great Ear-Piercing Taboo, jewelers offering piercing services were more like modern piercers than Claire’s employees (and doctors weren’t involved at all unless an infection set in). descriptions I’ve read of Victorian piercer-jewelers mention a lot of things we’re familiar with today- needles designed with a hollow for inserting the starter jewelry, for example, and even “freezing” solutions to numb the earlobe. so in those early resurgence days, going to a long-established jewelry store for your piercing might actually have been a better option than a doctor’s office
- two young women in a 1964 Canadian article (from Calgary) mention that they think screwback earrings look cheap and gaudy, and the pierced version is more conservative and tasteful, in an interesting reversal of mainstream thought
- a newspaper columnist saying pierced ears give him “the wim-wams,” so they are to be avoided. whatever the hell that means
- a LOT of people seem to think that ear piercing was popular in the Victorian era because wealthy women didn’t want to lose their expensive jewelry. sorry folks- my collection of Victorian costume earrings (all pierced) says otherwise
- much confusion as to why modern girls want to do something so old-fashioned
- one woman marvels at how comfortable it is to wear earrings in pierced ears, as opposed to clips and screwbacks. I feel infinitely blessed, as an earring-lover, to have been born when I could escape the scourge of ear-vises altogether
- apparently an eccentric elderly man on Salt Spring Island, British Columbia, literally bribed all the women of the community to pierce their ears because he liked the way it looked. one of them mentioned that she held out for $25- $244 CAD or $188 USD in today’s money. all because some rich Victwardian codger had a very specific fetish
- this absolutely incredible response of an Indian diplomat’s wife when asked, in New York, why she wore a diamond nose stud: “Because I feel [diamonds] become me more than rubies or emeralds.” QUEEN
- “when the fad changes, as it indubitably will-” are you certain of that, ma’am
11K notes · View notes