Tumgik
#RC Sproul
reformedfaith · 10 months
Text
No sin has ever made any person happy. Sin simply cannot bring happiness, but it can deliver pleasure, and when we confuse pleasure with happiness, we are wide open to the seduction of the enemy
R. C. Sproul
580 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Bible study
23 notes · View notes
If we love people, we will warn them of the consequences of dying in their sins.
R.C. Sproul
51 notes · View notes
Text
«Y la tierra estaba sin orden y vacía, y las tinieblas cubrían la superficie del abismo, y el Espíritu de Dios se movía sobre la superficie de las aguas» (Gn 1:2)
La voz de Dios dice: «Sea…», y el orden reemplaza al desorden, la plenitud reemplaza al vacío y la luz reemplaza la oscuridad. Las luces se encienden, un mundo comienza y es establecido el escenario para que Dios recoja el polvo con Sus manos y prepare una criatura para Su gloria.
Tumblr media
3 notes · View notes
songsintheattic · 10 months
Text
2 notes · View notes
cavillanche · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media
6 notes · View notes
walkswithmyfather · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
“The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the one and only Son, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.” —John 1:14 (NIV)
“For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will but the will of him who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me, that I should lose nothing of all that he has given me, but raise it up on the last day. For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who looks on the Son and believes in him should have eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day.” —John 6:38‭-‬40 (ESV)
“For this is how God loved the world: He gave his one and only Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish but have eternal life.” —John 3:16 (NLT)
“If God did not act first, no one would be saved.” (R.C. Sproul) So God acted first, sending His Beloved Son to die in our place, taking our sins upon Himself, so that we could be saved and have eternal life. There is no greater love.
Friend, whenever you feel like no one cares about you, remember that there is Someone who passionately cares about you so much that He sent His only Son to bring you back to be with Him. Remember that You are loved, more than you could ever know. All you have to do is open your heart and receive God's love. Anytime, anywhere, you can feel that perfect love; just close your eyes and receive. It is a lovely thought. Glory to God! Amen! 🙌
25 notes · View notes
skystonedclouds · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
Source : TheReformedSociety.
3 notes · View notes
geminiagentgreen · 9 days
Text
youtube
0 notes
logoswomen · 10 days
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
reformedfaith · 10 months
Text
I don't always feel His presence. But God's promises do not depend upon my feelings; they rest upon His integrity.
R. C. Sproul
414 notes · View notes
2 notes · View notes
alaluzdelaeternidad · 16 hours
Text
Aún debemos ver al hombre caído como portador de la imagen de Dios, pero como a uno quien por naturaleza, fuera de la obra regeneradora y santificadora del Espíritu Santo, refleja a Dios de manera distorsionada. En el proceso de redención esa distorsión va siendo eliminada progresivamente hasta que, en la vida venidera, volvamos de nuevo a reflejar perfectamente a Dios. —Anthony Hoekema
2 notes · View notes
eli-kittim · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
The Priority of the Epistles
Eli Kittim
Principles of Interpretation
Using R.C. Sproul’s hermeneutical guidelines from his book, Knowing Scripture, I will argue that there is a chronological discrepancy in the New Testament (NT) in which the timeline of Jesus’ life in the gospels is not the same as the one mentioned in the epistles. Specifically, the epistles contradict the gospels regarding the timeline of Christ’s birth, death, and resurrection by placing it in eschatological categories. So I will argue that, based on principles of interpretation, priority must be given to the epistles. According to R.C. Sproul, exegetes must interpret the implicit by the explicit and the narrative by the didactic. In practical terms, the NT epistles and other more explicit and didactic portions of Scripture must clarify the implicit meaning and significance of the gospel literature. Accordingly, I will argue that the epistles are the primary keys to unlocking the future timeline of Christ’s only visitation. According to R.C. Sproul’s hermeneutical guidelines, the gospels must be interpreted by the epistles.
“The Historical Narrative Must be
Interpreted by the Didactic”
— R.C. Sproul
Case in point. The epistles——which are the clearest teachings of the NT——apparently contradict the gospels regarding the timeline of Christ’s birth, death, and resurrection by placing it in eschatological categories. The epistolary authors deviate from the gospel writers in their understanding of the overall importance of eschatology in the chronology of Jesus. For them, Scripture comprises revelations and “prophetic writings” (see Rom. 16:25-26; 2 Pet. 1:19-21; Rev. 22:18-19)! For example, according to the NT epistles, Jesus Christ will die “once for all” (Gk. ἅπαξ hapax) “at the end of the age” (Heb. 9:26b), a phrase which consistently refers to the end of the world (cf. Mt. 13:39-40, 49; 24:3; 28:20). Similarly, just as Hebrews 1:2 says that the physical Son speaks to humanity in the “last days,” 1 Pet. 1:20 (NJB) clearly sets forth the eschatological timing of Christ’s initial appearance “at the final point of time.” Given that the epistles are the more didactic portions of Scripture, and that the gospel narratives are not considered historical by many scholars, it would therefore seem hermeneutically legitimate to interpret the narrative by the didactic!
The Explicit & the Implicit
“The implicit is to be interpreted in light of
the explicit. Not the other way around”
— R.C. Sproul
But we have it completely backwards. For centuries, we’ve tried to interpret the explicit (epistles) in light of the implicit (gospels). And yet, it’s the didactic portions of Scripture that teach with clear and explicit statements. For example, in terms of Jesus’ appearance and death, Hebrews 9:26 (KJV) says directly and clearly, “once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself.” This is an explicit statement that not only shows the time of his coming (ἅπαξ ἐπὶ συντελείᾳ τῶν αἰώνων) but also the purpose of his appearance, namely, to sacrifice himself in order to put away sin (εἰς ἀθέτησιν ⸀ἁμαρτίας διὰ τῆς θυσίας αὐτοῦ). In both the Greek and English versions, the statement is very clear. Jesus’ death takes place at the consummation of the ages. We find a parallel passage in 1 Peter 1:20 (ASV):
“[Jesus] was foreknown indeed before
the foundation of the world, but was
manifested at the end of the times.”
These are straightforward, clear, and explicit teachings. To subordinate these explicit epistolary teachings of Scripture and to argue on the basis of implications drawn from the more obscure gospel narratives is a misuse of the Scripture. If we insist on the canonical context of the Bible, namely, that each book in the Old Testament (OT) & the NT is related to all the other books and is inspired by the Holy Spirit, then we have to be careful not to set these two divisions——namely, the gospels and the epistles——in opposition. The problem arises when we deduce certain things from the gospels, which then bring us into direct conflict with something that the Scripture teaches in the epistles very clearly and very plainly.
“Our implications must always be measured
by and made subordinate to what the
Scriptures explicitly teach” — R.C. Sproul
The Totality of Scripture
“Every particular passage of Scripture must
be measured and interpreted against the
whole of Scripture” — R.C. Sproul
Let’s look at the gospel narratives and the didactic literature of the epistles and compare them. The didactic literature clearly demonstrates that the NT is an Apocalypse, whereas the gospels claim to be historical eyewitness accounts of Jesus’ Life, Death, and Resurrection. The first problem is that Bible scholars don’t consider the gospels as historical accounts, but rather view them as theological documents. The second problem is that the epistles seemingly contradict the gospels with regard to the birth, death, and resurrection of Christ by placing them in eschatological categories.
Now, let’s take the principle that “every particular passage of Scripture must be measured and interpreted against the whole of Scripture” and apply it to the Messianic timeline. And let’s ask the question: according to Scripture, does the Messiah come to earth during the time of antiquity or in the end times? In fact, most of the evidence with regard to the Messianic timeline in both the OT & NT is consistent with the epistles rather than with the gospels. For example, Zephaniah 1:7-8 declares that the Lord’s sacrifice will occur during “the day of the Lord” (not in antiquity; cf. Zeph. 1:14-18). Isaiah 2:19 says that people will hide in the caves of rocks when “the Lord … arises to terrify the earth.” In other words, the Lord’s resurrection is not separate from but contemporaneous with judgement day (cf. Rev. 6:15-17)! Similarly, Daniel 12:1 puts the resurrection of the anointed prince just prior to the great tribulation. This can be proved with detailed exegesis from the Greek text. For instance, the Septuagint (LXX Daniel 12:1) says παρελεύσεται, which means to “pass away,” while the Theodotion (Daniel 12:1) has ἀναστήσεται, meaning a bodily resurrection in the end-times. In the following verse (Daniel 12:2), the plural form of the exact same word (ἀναστήσονται) is used to describe the general resurrection of the dead! In other words, if the exact same word means resurrection in Daniel 12:2, then it must also necessarily mean resurrection in Daniel 12:1! Acts 3:20-21 similarly says that Christ will not be sent to earth until the consummation of the ages. Even Luke 17:30 claims that the Son of man has not yet been revealed! In fact, 1 Corinthians 15:22-24 tells us explicitly that Christ will be resurrected in the end-times (an idea also entertained by James Dunn):
“For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all
will be made alive. But each in his own
order: Christ the first fruits, after that those
who are Christ’s at His coming, then comes
the end.”
What is more, Revelation 12:5 makes it clear that the messiah is born in the end times as a contemporary of the last world empire, which is depicted as a seven-headed dragon with ten horns (cf. Rev. 17:9-14). In fact, chapter 12 & verse 5 describes the birth of the messiah, & the immediate next verse talks about the great tribulation. Likewise, Galatians 4:4 says that Jesus will be born during the consummation of the ages, expressed by the apocalyptic phrase τὸ πλήρωμα τοῦ χρόνου, which is defined in Ephesians 1:10 as the end of the world! And Hebrews 9:26 (KJV) says EXPLICITLY——categorically and unequivocally——that Jesus will die for the sins of mankind “once in the end of the world” (ἐπὶ συντελείᾳ τῶν αἰώνων)! Rev 19:10 also informs us that the TESTIMONY to Jesus is prophetic (not historical). Read Acts 10:40-41 where we are told that Jesus’ resurrection was based on visions because it was only visible “to witnesses who were chosen beforehand by God.” First Peter 1:10-11 also says that the NT prophets “predicted the sufferings of the Messiah” in advance (cf. Isa 46:10)!
0 notes
escritos-que-edificam · 3 months
Text
A minha confiança no futuro reside na minha confiança no Deus que controla a história.
R. C Sproul.
0 notes
cavillanche · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
I have chosen.
2 notes · View notes