Tumgik
#SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI
Text
Elon Musk, the new owner of Twitter, tweeted out an unfounded conspiracy theory Sunday morning about the attack on the husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi from a website that has a history of publishing false information.
Musk responded to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton when she tweeted out an L.A. Times story about how the suspect in the attack on Paul Pelosi, David DePape, spread far-right conspiracy theories.
"There is a tiny possibility there might be more to this story than meets the eye," Musk wrote to Clinton, linking to a story published on a right-wing website called the Santa Monica Observer that questioned the circumstances of the attack on Pelosi, according to an archived version of the story. (The website was no longer accessible late Sunday morning.)
As of late Sunday morning, Musk's tweet had more than 24,000 retweets and more than 86,000 likes, and was quickly gaining more traction.
The fact-checking website Media Bias/Fact Check rates the Santa Monica Observer as a "questionable source" based on "the routine publication of false and misleading information and the use of poor sources."
Media Bias/Fact Check said the website's article on the Pelosi attack "appears to be fake and defamatory."
Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment from NBC News.
The Santa Monica Observer has also published other fake stories that falsely reported that former Secretary Clinton died in the September 11, 2001 attacks and had been using a body double since then, and that Ye, the rapper formerly known as Kanye West, was appointed to a non-existent position in the Department of the Interior under former President Donald Trump.
The publisher of the website, David Ganezer, unsuccessfully ran for Santa Monica City Council in 2010 and 1988, according to the Santa Monica Daily Press. He is currently a registered Republican, voting records show.
Musk's tweet comes just days after his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter was finalized. Musk has said he will loosen rules about what kind of speech is allowed on the platform. That vow has prompted concerns that the changes could drive users and advertisers from the site.
DePape attacked Pelosi, 82, with a hammer after breaking into their California home early Friday. The suspect was searching for the House Speaker, who was in Washington, D.C. at the time, two sources told NBC News.
Police arrived after Pelosi called 911 when the suspect wasn't looking.
Pelosi suffered a skull fracture and serious injuries to his right arm and hands, according to Drew Hammill, spokesman for Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He underwent successful surgery and is expected to make a full recovery, Hammill added Friday.
Police said DePape will be charged with attempted homicide, among other charges. Officials have said they are still working to determine a motive in the attack.
89 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
47 notes · View notes
filosofablogger · 2 years
Text
STOP IT!!! JUST STOP IT!!! 🛑
STOP IT!!! JUST STOP IT!!! 🛑
Early this morning, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco home was broken into and her 82-year-old husband was brutally beaten. Speaker Pelosi was in Washington at the time. This past summer, Senator Susan Collins of Maine had windows broken out in her home.  Many members of Congress have received hate mail and death threats recently.  As I read aloud the story about the attack on Paul…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
wex3crypto · 2 years
Text
Steven Bartlett And Other Business Heavyweights Advise How Startups Can Grow And Scale-Up
Steven Bartlett, the youngest ever dragon from the BBC series ‘Dragon’s Den’ and founder of the social media marketing agency Social Chain, told Euronews’ team in Dubai that social media is key for startups when scaling up.
“If you’re walking down the street and there are 20 people looking up at a building, you’re going to look up at the building,” said Bartlett. “The way you decide whether to go and watch a movie on Netflix, or whatever, is based on reputation. We use the opinion of the tribe to help us survive because we don’t always have the time to make those decisions for ourselves.”
What is scaling up and what other levers do startups need to pull in order to get there?
Full Article:
1 note · View note
madamspeaker · 10 months
Text
If you were going to draw up a list of the people most responsible for the latest indictment of Donald Trump, the former president himself would be at the top, followed by the prosecutors who have brought the case. Republicans in Congress perversely deserve a great deal of credit, too, since they could have exiled Trump from political life and perhaps spared him more intense legal scrutiny if they had voted to convict him in the impeachment trial over his role in the siege of the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Ultimately, however, you cannot tell the story of Trump’s historic indictment without Nancy Pelosi. It was the then-Speaker of the House who insisted that there be a congressional inquiry following January 6. And it was the work of the select committee she fashioned that finally appears to have spurred a reluctant Justice Department to action, setting in motion a more intense phase of criminal scrutiny focused on Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election.The resulting indictment closely tracks the select committee’s work and findings, presenting a factual narrative that traces — almost identically — the evidence presented by the committee of a sophisticated, multipronged effort by Trump to remain in power that culminated in the mayhem at the U.S. Capitol.
“I knew on January 6 that he had committed a crime,” Pelosi told me late Friday afternoon, squeezing me in for a roughly 30-minute interview at the tail end of a remarkable week in Washington.
I wondered what was going through her head as someone who had played an essential role in bringing about the most important criminal prosecution in the history of our country, and I was curious, in particular, when it had occurred to her that Trump’s conduct following the 2020 election had not merely been politically destructive or outrageous but may have crossed the line into actual criminality.
During the Trump administration, Pelosi emerged as one of Trump’s most persistent and effective political antagonists, and the personal rancor between the two was often on public display. She went toe to toe with him in the Oval Office. She authorized the third-ever impeachment of an American president after Trump’s effort to shake down Ukraine’s president to get dirt on Joe Biden. She famously tore up Trump’s 2020 State of the Union speech while standing behind him. As Trump’s supporters began to approach the Capitol on January 6, Pelosi said that if Trump joined them, “I’m going to punch him out. I’ve been waiting for this. For trespassing on the Capitol grounds, I’m going to punch him out. And I’m going to go to jail, and I’m going to be happy.”
The rioters proceeded to ransack her office, and instead of punching Trump, who was prevented from going to the Capitol by the Secret Service, Pelosi impeached him again. To this day, Pelosi seems to get under Trump’s skin like no one else. Early Sunday morning, Trump called her “a sick & demented psycho who will someday live in HELL!”
Long before January 6 itself, Pelosi had been preparing for Trump to try to disrupt the transfer of power. “During the election, I thought, ‘He’s going to try to pull a stunt and we have to try to have as many states in the Democratic column as possible,’” she told me, contemplating the possibility that Biden’s victory might not be certified and that the House would have to move to an obscure procedure in which each state’s congressional delegation would cast a single vote to determine the next president.
Trump promptly proceeded to validate that concern, undertaking an extraordinary effort to remain in power after Election Day by falsely claiming that he had won and by trying to work various levers of official power to stay in office. “As we got closer to January 6, I knew he was cooking up all these things, but what was he going to do about it?” Pelosi recalled. “It was clear that he knew he did not win the election,” she explained. “It was clear, and he had to disrupt” the joint session of Congress to certify the election. As the indictment alleges, Trump did this not only by pressuring Vice-President Mike Pence to illegally cast aside Biden’s electoral votes but also by watching with apparent pleasure as a mob tore through the Capitol and by exploiting the violence fed by his lies.
“When we saw what he did on January 6, I knew that was a crime,” Pelosi added. She acknowledged that it is not possible to predict “what can be proven” successfully in court, “but I know he committed a crime that day.”
After Biden’s inauguration, Pelosi set about to organize a bipartisan 9/11 Commission–type investigation into the events that led up to January 6, but she was repeatedly stymied by congressional Republicans. “We yielded on every point,” Pelosi recalled of the negotiations with her Republican counterparts at the time. “We gave them an equal number of commission members, which we always would have done — equal member staff, equal member funding for everything — and equal subpoena power, which the majority never gives away, but nonetheless, we did it because this was so awful for our country, so necessary to have this.”
In what turned out to have been a historic miscalculation, Republican minority leader Mitch McConnell blocked the initiative in the Senate. “He went around to members and said, ‘Do me a personal favor and do not vote for this,’” Pelosi told me. “Even though he knew that night — and said — that the Republican president was responsible, they didn’t even want to have an investigation.”
Pelosi has earned a reputation as one of the most tactically savvy leaders in the history of the Congress, and she chuckled as she recalled McConnell’s maneuvering. “People said to Mitch, ‘You think Nancy is going to let this go?’ What could he have been thinking?”
Pelosi then shifted gears to negotiating over a select committee in the House with Republican leader Kevin McCarthy, who took the project about as seriously as McConnell had by proposing to name, among other people, bomb-thrower Jim Jordan to the panel. Pelosi quickly decided the negotiations were not going anywhere, explaining that McCarthy wanted to appoint members who would “totally undermine” the committee. “Okay,” she recalled thinking. “That’s really nice. So you get consultation as to who will serve [on the committee], and I have consulted with you, and I’ve said ‘no’ to who you want. That’s the power of the Speaker.”
Pelosi then assembled a group led by Democratic chair Bennie Thompson and Republican vice-chair Liz Cheney, along with six other Democrats and Republican congressman Adam Kinzinger. It did not take long for observers to conclude that McCarthy may have monumentally misplayed his hand, particularly after the committee produced a riveting series of hearings last summer that were mercifully free of the clownish and disruptive antics of the House GOP’s right flank.
In the course of our discussion, Pelosi was reluctant to take any sort of credit for the committee’s work or Trump’s indictment with the exception of taking “credit for the appointees” on the committee, whom she described as providing a “beautiful balance” in their approaches and a crucial “seriousness of purpose.”
Pelosi said she knew from the beginning that, in order for the committee to succeed, it could not operate in the way of typical committee hearings, and she worked to ensure that the members shared that perspective. “When people were accepting the offer to be on the committee, they knew that it wasn’t going to be every five minutes that they’d be speaking,” she said. “It would be part of the plan [to present] a narrative for the public to understand.”
In the end, Pelosi told me, “the quality of the membership, the effectiveness of the staff, and the excellence of the presentation made it one of the best presentations in the history of our country.”
Meanwhile, there were questions about what the Justice Department was doing to address the potential criminal culpability of Trump and those in his orbit. The committee’s members and staff were uncovering — and presenting to the public — damaging evidence that they had obtained from Trump administration officials, but the DOJ was not pursuing those same threads — despite public frustration among some observers — seemingly content with focusing on the people who had stormed the Capitol or who played a role in organizing the violence that day.
I asked Pelosi whether during this period she had ever tried to speak with Attorney General Merrick Garland, President Biden, or anyone in the White House about making sure the Justice Department was properly investigating Trump’s conduct. “No,” she quickly responded, telling me that she did not think it was appropriate for her to try to influence the department’s work behind closed doors.
“I did want them to pay attention, and I hope that we got their attention,” Pelosi told me. “That’s why the presentation — the narrative — had to be the way it was,” she explained, so that the public record could be as clear and credible as possible. “We couldn’t have people, like the Republicans wanted to put on, who would be disruptive, disruptive, disruptive. Too much was at stake.”
Still, there was palpable anxiety among House Democrats about the Justice Department’s progress — or lack thereof — investigating Trump directly. That anxiety may have reached a high point this June, when the Washington Post published a remarkable 8,000-word story providing the most comprehensive account to date of the department’s investigation into Trump’s conduct.
According to the Post, it took “more than a year” after January 6 “before prosecutors and FBI agents jointly embarked on a formal probe of actions directed from the White House to try to steal the election,” and “even then, the FBI stopped short of identifying the former president as a focus of that investigation.” One source told the paper that “it felt as though the department was reacting to the House committee’s work as well as heightened media coverage and commentary” as the department’s investigation finally gathered steam last year.
“When the Washington Post article came out,” Pelosi told me, “not that it was a complete shock or surprise to our members, but they were very concerned about it.”
Now that Trump has been indicted over his effort to steal the election, we are in the midst of a singular moment in American history — one that will have dramatic long-term implications for our country and one that will likely be covered in history books for generations to come. The difference, of course, is that as we live through this period, we have no idea how it will end — with Trump in prison or with Trump in the White House again.
I asked Pelosi how she thought this would all end, and she struck a tentative but cautiously optimistic tone. “As we always say, it all depends on what happens at the end of the day, but you have to determine what the end of the day is. Yesterday was the end of a day. The former president of the United States was arraigned, and that was a triumph for the truth.”
“The indictments against the president are exquisite,” Pelosi added, referring to both the latest set of charges and the earlier federal indictment over Trump’s hoarding of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago and his subsequent efforts to obstruct investigators. “They’re beautiful and intricate, and they probably have a better chance of conviction than anything that I would come up with.”
As for the prospect of a second Trump term, Pelosi immediately recoiled when I brought it up. “Don’t even think of that,” she told me. “Don’t think of the world being on fire. It cannot happen, or we will not be the United States of America.”
“If he were to be president,” she continued, “it would be a criminal enterprise in the White House.”
There was a time in American life, not that long ago, when that would have been clear hyperbole. These are categorically different times.
65 notes · View notes
pardcore · 1 day
Text
Tumblr media
9 notes · View notes
deadpresidents · 2 years
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media
121 notes · View notes
2glassesofchianti · 1 year
Text
I don't know what's funnier, the fact that it took McCarthy 15 votes to clinch the gavel or the fact that this is the most attention he will ever have as speaker of the house.
94 notes · View notes
tomorrowusa · 7 months
Text
youtube
REPUBLICANS IN DISARRAY!!!!11!!1!
Steve Scalise has withdrawn from the House Speaker race. Gym Jordan is back in the race despite the fact that he lost the last time the GOP caucus chose a candidate.
CNN spoke with GOP former Rep. Fred Upton. He basically said that he was relieved to be back in Michigan with his wife and grandkids these days.
House Republicans are meeting again on Friday afternoon. But a number of them have already stated that they would not support Gym Jordan for Speaker.
Journalist David Gregory told CNN that he expects Democrats to eventually jump in and try to work out a solution; the total GOP House shitstorm reflects badly on Congress as a whole and there's work to be done with multiple crises around the world and at home.
Republicans are simply unable to govern. At the heart of all this is Donald Trump having hijacked the party for his own purposes.
Don't let people spew bothsiderism to you about Democrats and Republicans in the House. Whether people agree with her or not, the House was infinitely better managed by Nancy Pelosi for eight years than it was by Kevin McCarthy for eight months.
9 notes · View notes
Text
The man who allegedly attacked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband early Friday posted memes and conspiracy theories on Facebook about COVID vaccines, the 2020 election and the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, and an acquaintance told CNN that he seemed “out of touch with reality.”
David DePape, 42, was identified by police Friday as the suspect in the assault on Paul Pelosi at the Speaker’s San Francisco home.
Three of DePape’s relatives told CNN that DePape has been estranged from his family for years, and confirmed that the Facebook account – which was taken down by the social media company on Friday – belonged to him.
His stepfather, Gene DePape, said David DePape grew up in Powell River, British Columbia, and left Canada about 20 years ago to pursue a relationship that brought him to California.
“I really don’t know what to think,” the suspect’s uncle, Mark DePape, said of his nephew’s alleged attack on Pelosi. “Hopefully it’s a scam. I don’t want to hear something like that.”
People who knew DePape in California described him as an odd character.
A 2013 article in the San Francisco Chronicle identified him as a “hemp jewelry maker,” and said that he lived with a nudist activist. Other photos published by the Chronicle show DePape – fully clothed – at a nude wedding on the steps of San Francisco City Hall.
Linda Schneider, a California resident, said she told CNN she got to know DePape roughly eight years ago and that he occasionally housesat for her. When they met, she said, DePape was living in a storage unit in the Berkeley area and told her he had been struggling with hard drugs but was “trying to create a new life for himself.”
She said that he was extremely shy. “He said he couldn’t even go and have a bank account because he was terrified of speaking to a teller,” Schneider said.
But Schneider later received “really disturbing” emails from DePape in which he sounded like a “megalomaniac and so out of touch with reality,” she said. She said she stopped communicating with him “because it seemed so dangerous,” adding that she recalled him “using Biblical justification to do harm.”
DePape’s social media presence similarly paints a picture of someone on a worrying trajectory, falling into conspiracy theories in recent years.
Last year, David DePape posted links on his Facebook page to multiple videos produced by My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell falsely alleging that the 2020 election was stolen. Other posts included transphobic images and linked to websites claiming COVID vaccines were deadly. “The death rates being promoted are what ever ‘THEY’ want to be promoted as the death rate,” one post read.
DePape also posted links to YouTube videos with titles like “Democrat FARCE Commission to Investigate January 6th Capitol Riot COLLAPSES in Congress!!!” and “Global Elites Plan To Take Control Of YOUR Money! (Revealed)”
Two days after former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin was found guilty of killing George Floyd, DePape wrote that the trial was “a modern lynching,” falsely indicating that Floyd died of a drug overdose.
He also posted content about the “Great Reset”– the sprawling conspiracy theory that global elites are using coronavirus to usher in a new world order in which they gain more power and oppress the masses. And he complained that politicians making promises to try to win votes “are offering you bribes in exchange for your further enslavement.”
BLOGS SHOW IMAGES OF PELOSI, QANON AND ANTISEMITISM
Most of the public posts on DePape’s Facebook page were from 2021. In earlier years, DePape also posted long screeds about religion, including claims that “Jesus is the anti christ.” None of the public posts appeared to mention Pelosi.
More recently, two other blogs written by someone with the username “daviddepape” have posted content similar to that on DePape’s Facebook page.
In a string of posts on a Wordpress.com blog over the course of several days in August 2022, the author complained about big tech censorship and posted statements like “Hitlery did nothing wrong.” The site has since been taken offline.
And another blog, also attributed to “daviddepape,” featured antisemitic screeds and content linked to the QAnon conspiracy theory. One video posted on the site includes a shot of Pelosi swinging a gavel during one of former President Donald Trump’s impeachments, and another video includes an image of Pelosi and other politicians. A third video includes a clip of Pelosi speaking on the House floor.
Other posts from the last few weeks featured videos accusing LGBTQ people of “grooming” children, and declared that “any journalist saying” there is no evidence of election fraud “should be dragged straight out into the street and shot.” The most recent post – linking to a YouTube video comparing colleges to cults – went up the day before the Pelosi attack.
CNN was not able to confirm that the two blogs were written by DePape.
Another former acquaintance of DePape’s also told CNN he exhibited concerning behavior over the years.
Laura Hayes, who also lives in California, said she worked with DePape for a few months roughly a decade ago making hemp bracelets when he was living in a storage shed in the Berkeley area. She said DePape sold the bracelets as a business.
“He was very odd. He didn’t make eye contact very well,” Hayes said. She recalled him saying that “he talks to angels and there will be a hard time coming.” But she didn’t remember any seriously threatening comments, and said she didn’t think much of it because “it’s Berkeley,” a place where eccentric characters aren’t uncommon.
Hayes, who was Facebook friends with DePape, called his more recent posts “so phobic in so many ways” and filled with “so much anger.”
36 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
333 notes · View notes
kneedeepincynade · 1 year
Text
Mc-ratt-y had to beg his own party 15 times before he could get a position and now this little rat thinks he can on the mighty Chinese nation and the great CPC? Delusional at best, suicidal at worse,the declining empire can barely sustain its proxy war in the failed state of Ukraine and wants to fight a rising power? Only a delusional rat could think so.
The post is machine translated
Translation is at the bottom
The collective is on telegram
⚠️ KEVIN MCCARTHY, IMPERIALISTA ANTI-CINESE, È STATO ELETTO PRESIDENTE DELLA CAMERA DEI RAPPRESENTANTI DEGLI STATI UNITI ⚠️
🇺🇸 Ieri, 7 gennaio, Kevin McCarthy è stato eletto Presidente della Camera dei Rappresentanti degli Stati Uniti, in sostituzione di Nancy Pelosi 🤪
🤮 Cambia la figura, "cambia" il partito politico in quanto McCarthy è del Partito Repubblicano mentre Nancy Pelosi è iscritta al Partito Democratico, ma la sostanza, la politica, la visione imperialista non cambia, e soprattutto non cambia la posizione fortemente anti-cinese ⚔️
🇺🇸|⚔️|🇨🇳 Così come Nancy Pelosi presenta un lungo curriculum di azioni anti-cinesi, molte delle quali estremamente ridicole, come quelle accadute nel 1991 a Pechino, anche McCarthy prova un fervente odio verso la Cina e verso il Socialismo, tanto che alla Camera, durante il suo discorso, ha affermato che tratterà il "tema dell'Ascesa del Partito Comunista Cinese" 🚩
😵‍💫 D'altronde, gli Stati Uniti giustificano le loro spese folli per l'imperialismo tramite la creazione di presunte "minacce" provenienti da altri paesi - ecco il principale problema per gli USA: la Cina. Non la povertà dilagante, in enorme crescita 📈
🔎 Non è una novità, chiunque applichi il Materialismo Storico e il Materialismo Dialettico sa bene che tra Partito Democratico e Partito Repubblicano non c'è alcuna differenza sostanziale: possono litigare e litigare su temi di importanza minore, ma sui temi fondamentali la pensano ugualmente.
🤡 La gigantesca quantità di reazionari che, per qualche regione, segue la Federazione Russa e pensa che il Partito Repubblicano o Trump possano significare la "vittoria della pace" può festeggiare per qualche ora l'elezione dell'ennesimo imperialista anti-comunista, ma questi individui dimenticano il fatto che gli USA, con un Democratico o un Repubblicano, non cambiano nella loro essenza 🇺🇸
🇺🇸|🇺🇦|🇹🇼 Togliere denaro e armi a Zelensky (che poi, questa gente ha letto il Budget per la Difesa degli USA per il 2023 in relazione all'Ucraina? Si può trovare il documento sul telegram del colletivo) e al suo Regime mantenuto in piedi artificialmente - per gli USA - non significa la pace, ma semplicemente dirottare quel denaro e quelle armi al regime-fantoccio d Taiwan.
🫣 Tuttavia, è normale che gli imperialisti statunitensi siano così aggressivi verso la Cina: sono spaventati, terrorizzati, ogni giorno che passa si avvicina sempre di più il superamento della Cina sul loro paese. La Cina li ha sorpassati tecnologicamente, a livello infrastrutturale, è in piena ascesa, mentre il sanguinario impero statunitense è in declino.
📄 Per chi volesse approfondire diversi temi, da Nancy Pelosi ai tentativi di Rivoluzione Colorata perpetrati dagli USA in Cina dal 1989 ad oggi, può rifarsi a questi post del Collettivo Shaoshan:
🔺Rivoluzione Colorata - Cenni Storici, Hong Kong, NED e Ruolo dei Media: I, II, III, IV, V.
🔺Gli USA forniranno fino a 12 miliardi di dollari in sovvenzioni, aiuti e prestiti al regime-fantoccio di Taiwan per l'acquisto di armi statunitensi.
📰 Qualche "reminder" per la componente reazionaria che segue la Russia, principalmente i "trumpisti":
🔺Trump propone una "NATO araba" per scontrarsi con l'Iran.
🔺Trump infligge nuove sanzioni a Cuba.
💭 Oggi, queste persone si sono trasformate in pro-Iran, grazie alla cooperazione (che esisteva pure ai tempi di Trump) russo-iraniana, e mantengono questa "visione" imbarazzante "pro-Trump" e "pro-Iran" - chi ha fatto assassinare Qasem Soleimani? 🇮🇷
🌸 Iscriviti 👉 @collettivoshaoshan
⚠️ ANTI-CHINESE IMPERIALIST KEVIN MCCARTHY ELECTED AS PRESIDENT OF THE US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ⚠️
🇺🇸 Yesterday, January 7, Kevin McCarthy was elected Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, replacing Nancy Pelosi 🤪
🤮 The figure changes, the political party "changes" as McCarthy is from the Republican Party while Nancy Pelosi is a member of the Democratic Party, but the substance, the politics, the imperialist vision does not change, and above all the strongly anti-Chinese position does not change ⚔️
🇺🇸|⚔️|🇨🇳 Just as Nancy Pelosi presents a long record of anti-Chinese actions, many of them extremely ridiculous, such as those that took place in 1991 in Beijing, McCarthy too feels a fervent hatred towards China and towards Socialism, much who in the House, during his speech, stated that he will deal with the "theme of the Rise of the Communist Party of China" 🚩
😵‍💫 On the other hand, the US justifies its spending spree for imperialism by creating alleged "threats" from other countries - here's the main problem for the US: China. Not rampant poverty, growing enormously 📈
🔎 It's nothing new, anyone who applies Historical Materialism and Dialectical Materialism knows well that there is no substantial difference between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party: they can argue and quarrel on issues of minor importance, but on fundamental issues they think anyway.
🤡 The gigantic amount of reactionaries who, for some regions, follow the Russian Federation and think that the Republican Party or Trump can mean the "victory of peace" can celebrate for a few hours the election of yet another anti-communist imperialist, but these individuals forget the fact that the USA, with a Democrat or a Republican, does not change in its essence 🇺🇸
🇺🇸|🇺🇦|🇹🇼 Taking money and weapons away from Zelensky (besides, have these people read the US Defense Budget for 2023 in relation to Ukraine? You can find the document in the collective telegram) and his Regime maintained artificially - for the US - does not mean peace, but simply divert that money and weapons to the puppet regime in Taiwan.
🫣 However, it is normal for the US imperialists to be so aggressive towards China: they are scared, terrified, with each passing day China's overthrow of their country is getting closer and closer. China has surpassed them technologically, infrastructurally, is on the rise, while the bloodthirsty US empire is in decline.
📄 For those wishing to delve into different themes, from Nancy Pelosi to the attempts of the Color Revolution perpetrated by the USA in China from 1989 to today, can refer to these posts from the Shaoshan Collective:
🔺Colored Revolution - History, Hong Kong, NED and Role of Media: I, II, III, IV, V.
🔺 The US will provide up to $12 billion in grants, aid and loans to Taiwan's puppet regime for the purchase of US weapons.
📰 A few "reminders" for the reactionary component following Russia, mainly the "Trumpists":
🔺Trump proposes an "Arab NATO" to clash with Iran.
🔺Trump imposes new sanctions on Cuba.
💭 Today, these people have turned pro-Iran, thanks to Russian-Iranian cooperation (which also existed in Trump's time), and they maintain this embarrassing "pro-Trump" and "pro-Iran" "view" - who has had Qasem Soleimani assassinated? 🇮🇷
🌸 Subscribe 👉 @collettivoshaoshan
28 notes · View notes
Photo
Tumblr media
[via Scott Horton]
13 notes · View notes
madamspeaker · 19 days
Text
Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi receives the Presidential Medal of Freedom
15 notes · View notes
trmpt · 7 months
Text
2 notes · View notes
uselectionnews · 8 months
Text
"How a California tribe won their ancestral land back and saved endangered salmon," by Izzie Ramirez in Vox.
"‘We’ve Been Shaken Out of This Fantasy’: How the Left Sees the War in Israel," by Alexander Burns in Politico.
"This war isn't like Israel's earlier wars," by Michael Oren in The Atlantic.
"Lawrence Summers, Ted Cruz criticize Harvard for student statement blaming Israel," by Andrew Zhang in Politico.
"Hamas’s Attack Confounds Middle East Experts," by Isabel Fattal in The Atlantic.
"Benjamin Netanyahu failed Israel," by Zack Beauchamp in Vox.
"Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Promises to Spoil the Election," by John Hendrickson in The Atlantic.
"The Roots of Today’s Authoritarianism Come From a 19th Century Supreme Court Ruling," by Sheryll Cashin in Politico.
"Matt Gaetz is Half Right," by Lee Drutman in The Atlantic.
"The inside story of how Newsom picked Butler for Senate," by Christopher Cadelago and Melanie Mason in Politico.
2 notes · View notes