so who had the government violating human rights law because they hate poor people on their 2023 tory bingo?
yeah so this piece by robert booth just got published in the guardian and it begins as such:
which is not at all surprising because yeah the government really hates poor people here. like as in one of the "solutions" to rising in homelessness in cities is to just,, buy unhoused people a one way train ticket to somewhere else.
its good to know that weve officially reached the level of violating international law. and by good, i dont know what i mean either.
anyway, booth goes on to say:
he is, of course, incredibly correct, and im highkey obsessed with him calling the welfare state "a leaking bucket".
obviously, the government gave a response of:
but did also go on to say this:
which doesnt really strengthen their argument. if anything, it actively hampers it.
it is also incredibly funny that the government's response to being accused of human rights violations due to the poverty in their country by the guy whose job involves being the go-to expert on human rights and poverty is akin to a child saying they didnt steal the chocolate that is staining their clothes and their hands and also they are still eating it.
please join me in pointing and laughing. at least, we have that.
de schutter actually offers solutions of his own within the article:
these, of course, famously being loved by tories. loved so much that they just forgot to do any of it during the last 13 years.
yeah, its been 13 fucking years.
if you dont use your vote to vote them out at the next general election, i will break your kneecaps with a rounders bat.
anyway, robert booth finishes the article off with:
and wheres the fucking lie? it hits the nail on the head so accurately, its honestly as impressing as it is depressing.
obviously, this isnt the entire article and i would implore you to read all of it.
i dont exactly have my hopes up for the government actually doing anything to effectively address poverty, but hey, you never know.
94 notes
·
View notes
End extreme poverty and promote shared prosperity
Since You Asked: How does the World Bank Group measure poverty? The World Bank Group’s mission is to end extreme poverty and promote shared prosperity. In order to monitor progress and understand the types of poverty reduction strategies that could work, it is important to measure poverty regularly.
0 notes
This new statistic is just completely heartbreaking and deeply disappointing. It's also a specific choice. A spike in child poverty like this didn't need to happen. Congress had the chance to extend these programs that would keep our children fed and boost working families out of poverty. But it didn't. It's shameful. In the richest country in the world, no child should have to go through this. And now it's on us to fix this problem that shouldn't have been created in the first place.
—John Fetterman, on the new child poverty statistics caused by allowing pandemic response programs to expire
115 notes
·
View notes
An Adjustment to Global Poverty Lines.
The World Bank updated the global poverty lines in September 2022. The decision, announced in May, follows the release in 2020 of new purchasing power parities (PPPs)—the main data used to convert different currencies into a common, comparable unit and account for price differences across countries. The new extreme poverty line of $2.15 per person per day, which replaces the $1.90 poverty line, is based on 2017 PPPs. Here you find more information about this change and what it means for measuring global poverty.
0 notes
From 1990 to 2019, the People's Republic of China has gone from a Poverty rate of 99%, to a poverty rate of less than 25% in just 29 years.
And just in the period of time Xi Jinping has been General Secretary of Communist Party of China, or the CPC, the Poverty rate in China has halved.
Poverty in that time in the US has been highly unequally distributed, with poverty rates increasing in some areas, decreasing in others, but largely remaining in similar territory since the 1970's. But the larger context shows a considerable destruction of wealth depending on when you were born with poverty rates lowest for those 65 and over, with much higher poverty rates among children.
The pattern suggests a dichotomy between the rapid rise of China and its attending decline in poverty, versus a slowly declining United States and the associated increases in poverty on younger generations. Though again, it depends largely on the state in which you live and how much your state invests in anti-poverty programs.
24 notes
·
View notes