beloved aro blog thank u for that response to the anon who didnt know how to tell if they were aro (it says asexual, but maybe that was a typo?). i generally use the aro label for myself because it fits 95% of the time but that 5% is when the doubt comes in and i feel like im "faking it." but that anon u answered has Cleared the Cobwebs of Doubt. youre Right. Amatonormativity is So Prevalent. the paragraph about wanting romance bc romance, or wanting romance bc society says u need a romantic relationship to get xyz thing from life Hit Me So Hard. i think i will come back to this post every time i feel Unsure about my label. so thank u for placing your words in that order for me. love loses. love wins. violence. have a great day homie
first of all. i'm ur beloved aro blog 🥺 nd yeah i do think it was a typo haha
second of all i'm so glad that it helped out for you :) the thing about amatonormativity is that you will constantly go "it can't be doing ALL of these things." but then it IS. EVERY TIME. you look up and amatonormativity is warping your ideas of self-worth and your plans for the future and your interactions with friends and family and holding society as a whole in a fucking vice grip and it's fucking. stealing your lunch money too. idk. that bitch. you know how it is. anyway that 5% is so real and you're so real for feeling it and it is NOT silly or cringe to take a few seconds in the bathroom mirror telling yourself "you ARE aromantic. and it's okay." if that's something that'll help. and also yada yada "aromanticism is not one uniform experience and arospec identities are valid and you can call yourself aromantic even if you experience romantic attraction sometimes as long as it feels like a label that's relevant to your experience" all the things that i'll say anytime someone is coming to me saying that they don't know if they're Really aro haha. just to get it out of the way. sounds like you've got stuff in a good place rn and i'm so glad that you're feeling that way :) hell yeah brother love loses!!!!! aromanticism forever and ever 🖤
24 notes
·
View notes
I hate society and how it treats and categorises (non-familial) relationships.
Society says "only platonic, romantic, and sexual" and completely ignores everything else. Says those are the only types of attraction you can feel. No nuance, no nothing. It all can be categorized into those categories. Not to mention of course it feels like platonic ones must always come second to romantic/sexual ones.
That's cool and all, but what if I have attraction that doesn't fit any of those things? What then?
Let me be clear, I know love isn't always romantic. But that's what the term is mainly connected with and I don't want that confusion even if I clarify it. But my view on relationships and attraction are so far disconnected from society's norm that if I try to talk about how I feel I'd always have to cater how I explain what I'm feeling to the people who follow the norm. And that's the problem. I can't.
Society has no words for how I feel. How can I describe what I feel without being forced to say "love" ? I don't want to use that word because of its connotations, but society doesn't care about anything else so we only have "love." How am I supposed to explain what I feel without the fear of it being misinterpertated? As an example: How do you tell someone that you want to be physically intimate with them (hugging, cuddling, kissing; all traditionally romantic things) and would also partake in sexual activities with them despite not being romantically or sexually attracted to them and not feeling that you need to be in a relationship with them to do those things?
And of course fuck monogamy and exclusivity being the standard.* Can I not show my affection to friends in relationships? Obviously I understand that they may be uncomfortable/not want to do some of the things I previously mentioned but why something not inheritly romantic/sexual like physical contact have to be restricted for people in relationships?
(*If people prefer or are happier this way, good for them. What I'm saying is I wish open relationships were more normalized, not that everyone has to be poly.)
I'm just tired of trying to fit myself into society's strict boxes. I don't want to try and explain what I feel as "romantic," "platonic," or "sexual." I need words outside of "love" to explain deep connections to people not associated with being platonic or romantic. I wish it was normal for people to be more open like that. I'm tired of trying to fit in just in general. I don't feel human. I feel like an alien among what is supposedly my own species.
Derailing a bit from the main topic but: Society just wasn't made for people like me. If you don't fit an overly specific image of "normal" society just says to go fuck yourself. I know this post is mainly geared for a-specs, but this last part can apply to basically anyone.
We are not obligated to fit ourselves into those boxes. But it's really hard to reject societal norms and feel comfortable doing so.
11 notes
·
View notes
Did you seriously reblog a post defending the sanctity of life of pedophiles?
You did not read that post.
I understand that it might be difficult, because of the knee-jerk reaction we all have when it comes to this topic. I admit I also had the emotional first-response of disgust. But I urge you to go back and try to read it again, when you are cool-headed.
Stating that 'murdering people we find disgusting is not the moral high ground it feels like', is not the same thing as 'defending the sanctity of life' of anyone.
And while it feels good to emotionally say 'we should kill all (people who do bad things that cause harm to others)' this does not actually accomplish what our brains think it does.
From the post:
denying the humanity of people who do horrible things accomplishes exactly three things:
give cover to people who haven't been caught yet by allowing them to use their humanity as "proof" of their innocence
silence any criticism of societal structures and institutions that facilitate those horrible things by putting the focus on individuals who are assumed to be so uniquely monstrous that the ways it was made easy for them are irrelevant
provide a shortcut to dehumanize anyone you feel like killing: simply accuse them of doing a horrible thing
Listen, to me, listen:
I know that we are all human and when we see someone committing evil things, we feel justified and good, and we want to use our teeth and claws to rip them to shreds. I KNOW it feels incredible to reply to pain and harm with equal violence.
But on an ideological level, if you EVER hope to understand how emotional manipulation and dehumanization on a social level works, you NEED to be prepared to unwrap this delicious i-can-murder-that-person-and-feel-rightous burrito.
You need to understand why it is not the swiss knife of justice that it feels like.
You need to know that it can and will be used to kill innocent people who don't deserve it, and you will not even notice.
Because if you can justify murder with a simple 'if you fit into this category you automatically don't deserve to live' then you are supporting an authoritarian regime, who can and WILL happily take the easier job of convincing you that some person that they need dead fits the description (of a person you've already agreed doesn't deserve anything but a swift and unquestionable death).
This is why, when they needed the gays to be feared and hunted, they labeled them 'pedophiles'. This is why they're now doing this to trans people. This is why dehumanization is a tool of oppression, not justice.
There is way to fix injustice in the world and protect children without becoming easier to manipulate and trick.
2K notes
·
View notes