The Attire of a Harlot distinquishes between modest dress for women versus those who dress like prostitutes revealing their bodies in ways that are not biblical.Some preachers characterize any women who wears, gold, lipstick, wigs, padding for certain body parts, jewelry, etc. are the same as prostitutes.
Click this link to check out our book, "Have You Spoken In Tongues?"
0 notes
1898-1900 Summer dress in striped cotton, with silk satin ribbon
(Mode Museum Antwerpen)
2K notes
·
View notes
Of course, the burkini ban is messed up on grounds of religious freedom and racial discrimination. But also
Under any other circumstances, people would be HORRIFIED at a government mandate that women have to show a certain amount of skin. Like. That’s fucking dystopian, and the absolute opposite of feminism. If a government tried to pass a law that all women had to wear tube tops and miniskirts to go outside, people would rightfully be up in arms demanding blood
But because it’s targeting a marginalized religious group, many folks are lauding the blatant forced sexualization of women. Appalling
(apparently the ban also outlaws things like sun – protecting bathing suits if they cover too much skin. Which like. Yes, let’s give everyone skin cancer just so we can spite a religion we’ve decided to hate. Sounds like a good plan </s>)
4K notes
·
View notes
ab. 1932 Velvet evening dress by Jean Patou
(Kunstgewerbemuseum Berlin)
2K notes
·
View notes