Listen. Sit down around the fireplace with me for a moment.
Artists. Gif makers. People who like memes. Anyone who posts images.
Y'all have got to start writing your own image descriptions. You have to. You really really have to start doing it yourself.
Us, the blogs dedicated to accessibility, cannot keep doing it for you. Well, we can, but we shouldn't have to. We shouldn't have to dedicate our time and energy to make posts that are not ours accessible and you shouldn't expect strangers to do you favors, especially when the work is so thankless. For every post I describe, a hundred more are posted without one.
The original post should be accessible. Adding an image description through a reblog is a metaphorical bandaid when what's needed are metaphorical stitches. Someone's ability to access the internet should not be dependent on the goodwill of others and goodwill that can just be ignored at that. People can simply choose to not reblog an accessible version of a post, whether intentionally or out of ignorance.
We don't expect volunteers to construct temporary ramps for buildings, we expect the building to have its own ramp, built to code.
The next time you see or post art, or a meme, or a screenshot from Twitter, ask yourself- does someone with a visual impairment not deserve to know what this image is about? Why should you get to laugh at the joke and not them?
Just.....just do it. Just write image descriptions. There's loads of resources out there to help you and even more references from the people who care.
Just. Do it.
Start doing then.
Start telling other people to do them.
Start reblogging them.
Accessibility is a necessity and it is not optional.
1K notes
·
View notes
A piano designed to be able to be played by the bedridden. Both the bed and piano are able to be rolled together for use.
If I understand correctly, it could also be used in the typical piano set-up, but if you weren't bedridden and had the option to play the piano from your bed, why wouldn't you?
392 notes
·
View notes
We can't stop staring at the cat's expression in this photo ca. 1900-1914. It comes from the National Library of Medicine's Images from the History of Medicine collection on JSTOR, featuring more than 40,000 open access photographs and illustrations!
874 notes
·
View notes
Wendy Red Star🎨
Wendy Red Star and her daughter Beatrice
Wendy Red Star - “Apsáalooke Roses” pairs the artist as a child (right) next to daughter, Beatrice, (left) both wearing regalia at the same age, a nod to their intergenerational collaboration as artists & the matrilineal Crow nation.
Wendy Red Star - Indigenous Gaze
Wendy Red Star - HER DREAMS ARE TRUE - 2020 - LITHOGRAPH.
Raised on the Apsáalooke (Crow) reservation in Montana, Red Star’s works across disciplines, including photography, sculpture, video, fiber arts and performance, to explore the intersections of Native American ideologies and colonial structures. Red Star researches historic archives and oral traditions in order to incorporate them with her research to create new and unexpected perspectives. Intergenerational collaboration is central to her artistic practice, working frequently with her daughter, striving to create space for Native women’s voices within the context of contemporary American art.
23 notes
·
View notes
"The Spell," a gelatin silver print by Henry Edward Gaze (1930s).
The photograph comes from the Museum of New Zealand - Te Papa Tongarewa collection on JSTOR, which features more than 46K open access images.
481 notes
·
View notes
just learned about the people posting '19th century paintings' by a supposed "emile corsi", which is actually just ai art misleadingly and purposefully being represented as actual historical pieces, and i do think this is an issue for art history and culture that people are doing this (and that more people are being tricked into reposting these pieces under the belief theyre legitimate historical ones, furthering the lie).
however after looking it up a bit im finding that the only issue people have with this is that misrepresentation of art history. and id like us to also consider that many of these pieces are in the 19th-century orientalist style, in which white european artists fictionalized, fetishized and otherized swana people. and the use of ai art to create new pieces of a historical racist style (which still today colors the way swana people and our history are perceived in the west) should be as big a concern as the issue of fooling people into thinking an artist who didnt exist actually did. probably more!
(preemptive disclaimer that im not "anti-ai" and dont care about having that argument. post is about a racist thing. does not need derailing.)
14 notes
·
View notes