Tumgik
#Relative Self
turiyatitta · 5 months
Text
The Paradox of Unconditional Love
From Relative to Ultimate SelfIn the pursuit of understanding love, especially unconditional love, we encounter a profound dichotomy between our relative self and our ultimate self. This journey from dualistic thinking to a non-dualistic state of being offered a rich terrain for philosophical exploration.#### Relative Self: The Duality of Love and JudgmentThe relative self operates in a world of…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
2 notes · View notes
shrimpchipsss · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
layout of the bamboo house from the scum villain donghua
961 notes · View notes
Text
political opinion: fingers should have more joints
5K notes · View notes
moonsun2010 · 9 months
Text
Tumblr media
"I wonder where Jonathan is and if he is thinking of me! I wish he were here."
843 notes · View notes
canonkiller · 3 months
Text
Tumblr media
do you consider your self made?
301 notes · View notes
basketobread · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
my bg3 ocs but in pathfinder wotr lol say hi to lotus and warlock 2.0 (who is an oracle so now his name is oracle here sorry not sorry)
197 notes · View notes
goated33 · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
(Lucifer voice) Chawlie
161 notes · View notes
canisalbus · 3 months
Note
very random question and don’t feel obligated to reply but your style reminds me of dark souls/pathologic/those types of games in general. that might just be due to the historical context but i’m curious, are you a fan of games like that?
If I had to guess it could be just the vaguely historical setting, religious overtones and occasional darker themes? My knowledge on Dark Souls et al. is sparse at best, people have been telling me to give them a try but I haven't gotten around to it.
159 notes · View notes
rhinocio · 10 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
(2-3/?)
first - series
--
気楽 に行こう. (kiraku ni ikou) - Take it easy. だいじょぶです! (daijoubu desu) - It's okay! ご愁傷様です,弟. (go-shūshō-sama desu, ototo) - I'm sorry for your loss, little brother. あなた は 一人 じゃない. (anata wa hitori ja nai) - You are not alone. 弟 (ototo) - Younger brother 濱戸リア (hamato lea) - Lea Hamato はじめまして, 弟. (hajimemashite, ototo) - Nice to meet you, little brother.
403 notes · View notes
lazer-t · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Low-poly Wolf stickers are now available in my BigCartel store
Come in three different variants: Red, Black and White, and can be bought as complete sets of 10 different stickers, or as randomly selected individual stickers
Listing link
More stickers
146 notes · View notes
prettyboykatsuki · 3 months
Text
there is truly a strange disconnect between some astarion fans and not recognizing his most basic trait as being a sponge for attention.
127 notes · View notes
cyanbeetle · 1 month
Text
I’ve tried like 500 times to articulate my thoughts about nonwhite superman and how much that adds to his childhood of loneliness and every time I hit a stumbling block because the topic makes me too insane to think but please hold my hand and imagine this little boy trying to grow up in rural Kansas and being the only person he’s ever known who looks like he does. This little boy who never has a proper answer when people ask where he’s really from, and even once he knows the truth of himself he can never safely share it. Please imagine him fighting every single day to belong and never being able to no matter how hard he tries because people will always find something questionable in the very way he looks. A lot of the superman mythos is dependant on Clark’s ability to assimilate but when you take that away what is left?? He’s just a kid fighting so hard for a belonging he’ll never have a hope in hell of being handed. Oh it hurts my heart
55 notes · View notes
librarycards · 2 months
Text
The term “social transition” has a non-trans history in the psychology of adolescence. In the 1980s, it was an operative metaphor for describing adolescence through the American trope of a rocky period of self-making, what one psychologist in 1978 termed “the difficulty of adolescence as a transitional period.” The primary “transition” that concerned psychologists at the time was school, where social shifts in friend groups and hierarchies from middle school to high school affected a young person’s self-esteem and mental integrity, resulting either in positive self-actualization or, if the social transition went poorly, “problem behavior.”³
The term “social transition” was only later adopted by psychologists and psychiatrists looking to powerfully expand their jurisdiction over trans youth to include entirely non-medical practices that often spur parents to reject or harm their kids: wearing a dress, cutting or growing out hair, wearing a binder or a bra, wearing makeup, or adopting a new name and pronouns. Making those banal but concrete practices of changing gender into psychiatric events was intended to convince anxious and angry parents that they shouldn’t put down their children. By the same token, tying practices of clothing and self-description to healthy development overinflated them with a pathological degree of significance, upping the ante and creating a lucrative target, both for parents of trans youth who wanted to stop their children from transitioning and, now, politicians.
I don’t mean to imply that psychiatry directly caused HB 2885, just that it clearly holds one part of the blame for inventing the root vulnerability that Gragg has taken advantage of in Missouri. If anything, the attachment of sex offender felonies to a teacher complimenting a teenager’s haircut exposes, once and for all, how fraudulent the medicalization of transition has been all along. Gragg can claim the right of the state to control children’s dress and speech (masquerading as the rights of parents) through teachers and counselors, in part, because psychiatry and medicine first claimed the right to regulate trans youth’s practices of transition.
Still, the causal events that led to HB 2885 run far deeper than the shallow history of “social transition” as an especially foolish psychiatric fiction. Here lies the far bigger problem raised by this bill. Not only will psychiatrists prove to be the least effective political allies of trans youth in Missouri, but contemporary queer and transgender culture’s elevation of the private right to dress as the sine qua non of politics is also quite useless as a political strategy.
Part of what I gather stuns in bills like HB 2885 is their audacity. The law would target the most conservative, least politically subversive of all transgender practices: individual style, identification, and language-use. In the case of minors, “social transition” is also a cheap compromise offered to young people who are refused blockers and hormones by disapproving parents and doctors, but that compromise is offered in a broader queer and transgender culture that has elevated self-identification through style as the ultimate arbiter of being transgender, making it much harder to advocate for a genuine right to transition for anyone, teenager or adult.
[...]
Students have very limited First Amendment rights on school campuses, meaning that they cannot present themselves as private individuals enjoying the right to dress as they please.⁷Their self-expression is governed from the outset by a competing set of custodians, from parents to schoolteachers, to psychiatrists and doctors, to the Missouri House of Representatives. Trans youth’s interests are therefore materially extraneous to the mainline of contemporary queer and transgender culture, whose architects were wealthy, college-educated adults whose prior enjoyment of full-citizenship was the very reason they demanded only the affirmation of a right to dress.
I suspect that part of the genuine shock of bills like HB 2885 is that most people reasoned that LGBT liberalism’s elevation of the private individual over all other political concerns would inoculate dress and language from state interference. It evidently has not. What perhaps has been misunderstood, then, is how the state exercises power. The law cannot prohibit being transgender, for there is no such state of being. The state has no need to target people’s interior selves, either, for the law can seize people where it always has, in concrete social practices that it simply declares are the undesirable traits of transgender people—namely, practices of transition.
Jules Gill-Peterson, The Unimportance of Wearing Clothes. [emphasis added]
55 notes · View notes
cak31ssuperi04 · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
fun fact: Them
84 notes · View notes
canon-gabriel-quotes · 4 months
Text
Thank you to everyone supporting the “it’s a body suit but it’s the angel equivalent of nude colored” agenda.
You understood the assignment. Best of both worlds.
102 notes · View notes
muffinlance · 7 months
Note
Weird question but do you think I could put that my art was in Li’s Book of Friends on my resume? Totally cool if not I’ve just barely done anything in my life and I’m rather proud of that lol. You don’t have to answer publicly
ABSOLUTELY. It's on my resume, too!
Potential buzz word vomit: you were a "featured artist" who "coordinated with a grassroots team of over fifty international artists and writers to produce an illustrated fantasy travelogue that has raised over $3,000 USD in support of wildlife conservation."
Always list fannish works on your resume. They sounds AMAZING as long as you talk around the fandom name.
146 notes · View notes