FROM ME TO YOU
Repeat after me: don’t let anybody Mentally abuse you. And don’t let anybody talk down about you or bring your confidence down. You are your own person nobody else is in control of your life. No matter who it is: your parents, teachers, friends, strangers on the street, and significant others.
They have no impact on your life whatsoever and if you feel like they do cut them off don’t let those people bring you down it’s your life do what you want and be who you want Ik I might be a stranger on the internet but I’m speaking from experience. If you feel like cutting your family off will bring you peace DO IT, if you have to cut off your friends DO IT don’t let anyone or anybody stop you from achieving that life you want. Again it’s your life nobody else don’t feel like you have to change something because someone doesn’t like it and don’t compare yourself to others either.
I know it’s a hard world out there but trust me it’s gonna get better if you drop all of those toxic things and people from your life. I mean it and I love you even if you don’t feel like it. If you ever wanna talk my dms are always opened or you can message me on Instagram on my backup and main account: i6milfs & jolyneswif3
- MJ <3
61 notes
·
View notes
I want to put a gentle reminder here that it's usually not a personal case when we remove people from our Discord. If we find there's a clear end of the conversation and no exchanges were made since for a bit, we'd remove at some point as we do tend to clean our list to keep our space small. We have emotional deattachment and ongoing amnesia, so it's very easy for especially me to feel disconnected or overwhelmed in general / with all platforms we're on. That's why we don't often readily hand out our Discord until we chat occasionally and our connection has been building ( unless for rare occasions like going over commissions or having very serious discussions ) because I do feel bad removing people, but if nothing is happening usually for a while, then we do have to remove at some point to have a comfortable space for ourselves. But we're always open for refriends on Discord unless we make a post otherwise to have some space.
11 notes
·
View notes
Hans isn’t a sociopath
Because this is a fictional character a comprehensive evaluation cannot be done; however, without having completed one you can see there are no signs of sociopathic traits.
In chapter two of A Frozen Heart Hans shows that he is able to effectively empathize with others – he stated that he feels badly that his brother Caleb treats his wife so poorly and he ponders having a relationship with her because he can relate to not fitting into the Westergaard family. Later, in chapter five, he expresses the important of his bond with his brother Lars who he has maintained a positive relationship with and seeks out when he is in need of interaction or comfort.
Hans shows on both occasions the ability to choose whom he will bond with, which those with sociopathic traits struggle to do.
It should also be taken into consideration that through Frozen Hans’ course of action changes. His plan to court Elsa is altered when he meets Anna and realizes Elsa may be preferable but she is not accessible, unlike Anna. From A Frozen Heart we know overthrowing either sister wasn’t his original course of action, he sought only to escape the isles and marriage would provide that. When Anna’s heart is frozen Hans ( knowing that because he struggles to form romantic attachments and believes love is something foolish and weak) leaves her for dead because there is nothing that can be done to save her anyway – he chooses to attach himself to Arendelle because they need him and above all Hans wants to be needed on a larger scale – with Anna as acting regent her death is needed to make him prince regent and grants the legal right to kill Elsa and end her curse. All of which are last minute decisions, as he had no way of knowing Anna would be hurt in the first place. He was, until that moment, content to marry Anna.
It’s important to note that regicide is not an uncommon practice, while abhorrent, it was widespread and in that respect not abnormal on Hans’ part. We need to look no further than the Tudor Dynasty and the War of the roses for further evidence of this.
Summary And Conclusions
Based on the results of my own evaluation of canon history and childhood in both Frozen and excerpts of A Frozen Heart, Hans Westergaard meets the criteria for the following diagnosis according to the DSM – IV TR:
Axis I
313.89 Reactive Attachment Disorder
309.81 Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Axis II
301.82 Avoidant Personality Disorder
Axis III
Non-Contributory
Axis IV
Childhood abuse, childhood neglect, discord with parents and siblings, estrangement from family.
Axis V GAF = 55
45 notes
·
View notes
again with this shit
Stop acting like Ed’s some unhinged abusive monster for the toe thing while trivializing Izzy’s bad choices in the same breath.
Stop acting like Izzy is some unhinged abusive monster for his litany of bad choices while trivializing Ed's violent actions in the same breath!
Everyday I get less and less tolerant of people acting like Ed overreacted and Izzy did absolutely nothing to justify what happened to him in episode 10.
Everyday I get less and less tolerant of people acting like cutting off someone's toe while they sleep and forcing them to eat it is ever a justified action!!!! It does not matter what the person you're doing it to did in order to "justify" having it happen to them, you are still maiming someone!
Besides “Ed’s becoming a different person so Izzy has the right to be upset” does not track
I don't think i have ever in my time scouring the Izzy Hands tag seen someone say that Izzy has the right to think or do the things he's done. I've seen people explain the why of those things, but never justifying the actions. Someone explaining why Izzy thinks his actions were the right choices in the moment is not the same as them actually saying that Izzy's actions were the right thing to do.
I think the reason people see these things as lesser than the choking or toe incident is because of the subconscious tendency we have to deemphasize emotional abuse.
I think the reason people are trying to justify Ed permanently maiming Izzy is because they subconsciously think that some abuse is okay and maybe even deserved if the victim is an unpleasant or "bad" person. I mean this person literally said "people acting like [...] Izzy did absolutely nothing to justify what happened to him." as though what Izzy did justified what happened.
The pain Ed caused Izzy was not worse or “disproportionate” to what Izzy caused Ed just because it was physical.
yeah actually it fucking was disproportionate. like, yeah, the things Izzy said were supremely shitty, but i've had people say things to me that were way worse and I'd chose the mental trauma of those cruel words over the physical trauma of getting my toe cut off (and the mental trauma of being forced to eat my own fucking toe) literally any goddamn day.
"just because it was physical" as though there's gonna be no mental element to that trauma. jfc
26 notes
·
View notes
My last week was kind of stressful, but I’m not carrying that energy over to this week. I’ve made some down time for myself, plus I’m adamant on sorting out my sleep because it has been terrible in the last couple of months. I’m considering taking melatonin to help, but my anxiety always makes me paranoid about it lol If any of you have tried/used melatonin, have you noticed it being beneficial for your sleep?
On another note, I’m also excited about this week because I planned out a few dinner dates with my friends and we haven’t been able to catch up with each other in a while 🥺 I hope you’re all doing great too! ❤️
16 notes
·
View notes